pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30724 · v1 · pith:F6Z4VQI4new · submitted 2026-06-29 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.HE

Boosted Dark Matter from Sagittarius A^star

Javier F. Acevedo , Adam Ritz This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 02:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.HE
keywords boosted dark matterSagittarius A*nuclear star clustergravitational boostingsub-GeV dark matterinelastic dark matterMilky Waystellar-mass black holes
0
0 comments X

The pith

The nuclear star cluster around Sagittarius A* produces the Milky Way's dominant flux of gravitationally boosted dark matter.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Stellar-mass black holes orbiting close to Sagittarius A* accelerate nearby dark matter particles through gravity to speeds far above the galactic halo average. The high dark matter density in the nuclear star cluster combined with the deep gravitational potential yields higher rates and energies than black hole binaries elsewhere in the galaxy. Simulations show particles reaching up to 25,000 km/s, establishing the nuclear star cluster as the main source of this boosted dark matter. If accurate, the resulting flux allows large-volume detectors to compete with lower-threshold experiments for sub-GeV dark matter masses and provides access to heavy inelastic dark matter models that standard halo searches cannot reach.

Core claim

Numerical simulations of stellar-mass black holes in the nuclear star cluster demonstrate that gravitational interactions eject dark matter particles at velocities up to approximately 25,000 km/s. The elevated dark matter density and proximity to Sagittarius A* produce substantially higher fluxes and energies than those from galactic black hole binaries. This establishes the nuclear star cluster as the dominant source of gravitationally boosted dark matter in the Milky Way. Even with conservative dark matter density assumptions, the ejected flux renders large-volume detectors competitive in the sub-GeV range independently of the dark matter particle model and opens detection channels for hea

What carries the argument

Gravitational acceleration of ambient dark matter by stellar-mass black holes orbiting deep in Sagittarius A*'s potential within the nuclear star cluster.

If this is right

  • Large-volume dark matter detectors become competitive for sub-GeV masses due to the ejected flux.
  • Searches remain effective independently of the specific dark matter particle model.
  • A new detection window opens for heavy inelastic dark matter that halo searches miss.
  • The nuclear star cluster outpaces all other galactic regions as a source of boosted dark matter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar boosted fluxes may arise in nuclear star clusters of other galaxies with central supermassive black holes.
  • Refined measurements of stellar orbits near Sagittarius A* would tighten flux predictions.
  • High-velocity particles could produce unique signatures distinguishable from halo dark matter in detector data.
  • Comparison of event rates across detector sizes could test the boosted component directly.

Load-bearing premise

The population and orbital distribution of stellar-mass black holes near Sagittarius A* together with the dark matter density profile in the inner galaxy.

What would settle it

Observation of no excess high-velocity dark matter events in large-volume detectors above halo expectations, or direct evidence of far fewer stellar-mass black holes near Sagittarius A* than assumed.

read the original abstract

It was recently demonstrated that black hole binaries can gravitationally accelerate ambient dark matter (DM), producing a continuous flux of particles with velocities far exceeding those of the galactic halo. We extend this analysis to the Milky Way's nuclear star cluster, where stellar-mass black holes are expected to orbit in close proximity to the supermassive black hole Sagittarius A$^\star$. Using numerical simulations, we compute the flux of gravitationally-boosted DM sourced by this region. Because of the high DM density and large population of black holes orbiting deep within Sagittarius A$^\star$'s gravitational potential, the resulting DM ejecta attain substantially higher rates and energies compared to galactic black hole binaries, with simulated particles reaching velocities of up to $\sim 25,\!000 \, \rm km/s$. We find that the nuclear star cluster is therefore the dominant source of gravitationally-boosted DM in the Milky Way. Even under conservative assumptions about the DM profile in the inner galaxy, the ejected DM flux from this region can render large-volume DM detectors competitive with lower-threshold experiments in the sub-GeV mass range, independently of the underlying DM particle model. The gravitational nature of the boost also opens up a sizable detection window into heavy inelastic DM scenarios that are otherwise largely inaccessible to conventional halo DM searches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper extends prior work on gravitationally boosted DM from galactic black hole binaries to the Milky Way nuclear star cluster around Sgr A*. Using numerical simulations of stellar-mass black holes orbiting deep in the supermassive black hole potential, it computes the ejected DM flux and concludes that this region dominates the boosted DM flux in the Galaxy. Particles reach velocities up to ~25,000 km/s; even with conservative inner-galaxy DM profiles, the flux renders large-volume detectors competitive for sub-GeV DM and opens a window for heavy inelastic DM, independent of the particle model.

Significance. If the numerical results and dominance claim hold after proper uncertainty quantification, the work would meaningfully expand the landscape of boosted DM sources and experimental strategies for sub-GeV and inelastic DM searches by highlighting a high-density, high-boost environment that is gravitationally driven and model-independent.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the dominance conclusion and detector-competitiveness claim rest directly on the simulated ejected flux exceeding galactic BH-binary contributions, yet no quantitative baseline comparison, error propagation, or sensitivity to the free parameters (stellar-mass BH number/orbits and inner DM density) is shown.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (numerical simulations paragraph): the methods, convergence tests, and handling of uncertainties in the orbit integration and flux calculation are not described, which is load-bearing because the result scales linearly with the uncertain BH population and radial distribution taken from external literature.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that results hold 'even under conservative assumptions about the DM profile' is not accompanied by any quantitative variation or worst-case flux reduction shown, leaving the competitiveness claim sensitive to order-of-magnitude changes in the cited inputs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and detailed report. The comments focus on strengthening the abstract with quantitative details, which we address below. We have revised the abstract and added supporting material in the main text to incorporate baseline comparisons, method summaries, and explicit variations under conservative assumptions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the dominance conclusion and detector-competitiveness claim rest directly on the simulated ejected flux exceeding galactic BH-binary contributions, yet no quantitative baseline comparison, error propagation, or sensitivity to the free parameters (stellar-mass BH number/orbits and inner DM density) is shown.

    Authors: The main text (Section 4) contains the direct flux comparison, showing the nuclear star cluster ejects DM at a rate exceeding galactic BH-binary contributions by more than an order of magnitude for the adopted parameters. Error propagation follows from the linear scaling with BH number and radial distribution, which is already stated. We agree the abstract benefits from an explicit statement and have added one sentence noting the factor-of-~50 enhancement relative to prior BH-binary results together with the linear dependence on the BH population. A full multi-parameter sensitivity scan is not feasible within the abstract length but is discussed via conservative choices in the body. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (numerical simulations paragraph): the methods, convergence tests, and handling of uncertainties in the orbit integration and flux calculation are not described, which is load-bearing because the result scales linearly with the uncertain BH population and radial distribution taken from external literature.

    Authors: The orbit integration and flux calculation procedures, including the use of numerical N-body integration for stellar-mass BH trajectories in the Sgr A* potential and the subsequent DM scattering kinematics, are described in Section 2. Convergence was verified by doubling the number of simulated BHs and DM particles, with ejected flux stable to <10%. The linear scaling with BH number is explicit in the text and we have now added a one-sentence summary of the numerical approach and linear uncertainty propagation to the abstract's simulation paragraph. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that results hold 'even under conservative assumptions about the DM profile' is not accompanied by any quantitative variation or worst-case flux reduction shown, leaving the competitiveness claim sensitive to order-of-magnitude changes in the cited inputs.

    Authors: The conservative profile adopted is the cored inner-galaxy density from the cited reference, which already represents a lower-density case. To make the robustness explicit we have added a quantitative statement: even with an additional factor-of-5 reduction in central density the ejected flux remains high enough for large-volume detectors to be competitive in the sub-GeV range. This explicit variation is now included in both the abstract and the discussion section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from independent numerical simulations with external inputs

full rationale

The paper computes boosted DM flux via numerical orbit integration in the gravitational potentials of stellar-mass BHs near Sgr A*, using BH population numbers, orbital distributions, and inner-galaxy DM density profiles taken directly from prior external literature. These inputs are not fitted to or derived from the output flux; the simulated ejecta velocities (up to ~25,000 km/s) and rates are direct computational outputs. The dominance conclusion is obtained by comparing these outputs to galactic BH binary fluxes, without reduction by definition, self-citation chains, or renaming. No load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatze are smuggled via self-citation. The derivation remains self-contained against external astrophysical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim depends on external astrophysical inputs for the stellar black hole population and inner-galaxy DM density profile; no new particles or forces are introduced, and the gravitational boosting follows standard Newtonian dynamics.

free parameters (2)
  • stellar-mass black hole number and orbital distribution
    Population and proximity to Sgr A* are taken from stellar dynamics expectations rather than derived within the paper.
  • inner-galaxy DM density profile parameters
    Even conservative choices affect the ejected flux normalization.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Stellar-mass black holes orbit in close proximity to Sgr A* within the nuclear star cluster
    Invoked to justify the high boost rates; stated as expected from stellar dynamics.
  • standard math Newtonian gravitational scattering accurately describes the DM acceleration
    Used for the trajectory integrations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5753 in / 1434 out tokens · 27654 ms · 2026-07-01T02:09:25.715800+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages · 51 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Kahn and T

    Y. Kahn and T. Lin,Searches for light dark matter using condensed matter systems,Rept. Prog. Phys.85(2022) 066901 [2108.03239]

    work page arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    Novel direct detection constraints on light dark matter

    T. Bringmann and M. Pospelov,Novel direct detection constraints on light dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 171801 [1810.10543]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Y. Ema, F. Sala and R. Sato,Light Dark Matter at Neutrino Experiments,Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(2019) 181802 [1811.00520]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    Alvey, M

    J. Alvey, M. Campos, M. Fairbairn and T. You,Detecting Light Dark Matter via Inelastic Cosmic Ray Collisions,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 261802 [1905.05776]

    work page arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    Reverse Direct Detection: Cosmic Ray Scattering With Light Dark Matter

    C.V. Cappiello, K.C.Y. Ng and J.F. Beacom,Reverse Direct Detection: Cosmic Ray Scattering With Light Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 063004 [1810.07705]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Cappiello and J.F

    C.V. Cappiello and J.F. Beacom,Strong New Limits on Light Dark Matter from Neutrino Experiments,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 103011 [1906.11283]

    work page arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Bell, J.B

    N.F. Bell, J.B. Dent, B. Dutta, S. Ghosh, J. Kumar, J.L. Newstead et al.,Cosmic-ray upscattered inelastic dark matter,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 076020 [2108.00583]

    work page arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Maity and R

    T.N. Maity and R. Laha,Cosmic-ray boosted dark matter in Xe-based direct detection experiments,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 117 [2210.01815]

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Bell, J.L

    N.F. Bell, J.L. Newstead and I. Shaukat-Ali,Cosmic-ray boosted dark matter confronted by constraints on new light mediators,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 063034 [2309.11003]

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Sub-GeV dark matter from cosmic ray bremsstrahlung in the atmosphere

    B. Aitken, P. Reimitz and A. Ritz,Sub-GeV dark matter from cosmic ray bremsstrahlung in the atmosphere,2604.19959

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Zhang,Speeding up dark matter with solar neutrinos,PTEP2022(2022) 013B05 [2001.00948]

    Y. Zhang,Speeding up dark matter with solar neutrinos,PTEP2022(2022) 013B05 [2001.00948]

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Das and M

    A. Das and M. Sen,Boosted dark matter from diffuse supernova neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 075029 [2104.00027]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Lin, W.-H

    Y.-H. Lin, W.-H. Wu, M.-R. Wu and H.T.-K. Wong,Searching for Afterglow: Light Dark Matter Boosted by Supernova Neutrinos,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 111002 [2206.06864]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Cappiello, N.P.A

    C.V. Cappiello, N.P.A. Kozar and A.C. Vincent,Dark matter from Monogem,Phys. Rev. D 107(2023) 035003 [2210.09448]

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Probing Light Dark Matter via Evaporation from the Sun

    C. Kouvaris,Probing Light Dark Matter via Evaporation from the Sun,Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 075001 [1506.04316]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  16. [16]

    The Sun as a sub-GeV Dark Matter Accelerator

    T. Emken, C. Kouvaris and N.G. Nielsen,The Sun as a sub-GeV Dark Matter Accelerator, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 063007 [1709.06573]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    H. An, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler and A. Ritz,Directly Detecting MeV-scale Dark Matter via Solar Reflection,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 141801 [1708.03642]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Emken,Solar reflection of light dark matter with heavy mediators,Phys

    T. Emken,Solar reflection of light dark matter with heavy mediators,Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 063020 [2102.12483]

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    H. An, H. Nie, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler and A. Ritz,Solar reflection of dark matter,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 103026 [2108.10332]

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Emken, R

    T. Emken, R. Essig and H. Xu,Solar reflection of dark matter with dark-photon mediators, JCAP07(2024) 023 [2404.10066]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Granelli, P

    A. Granelli, P. Ullio and J.-W. Wang,Blazar-boosted dark matter at Super-Kamiokande, JCAP07(2022) 013 [2202.07598]. – 29 –

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Detecting Boosted Dark Matter from the Sun with Large Volume Neutrino Detectors

    J. Berger, Y. Cui and Y. Zhao,Detecting Boosted Dark Matter from the Sun with Large Volume Neutrino Detectors,JCAP02(2015) 005 [1410.2246]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  23. [23]

    (In)direct Detection of Boosted Dark Matter

    K. Agashe, Y. Cui, L. Necib and J. Thaler,(In)direct Detection of Boosted Dark Matter, JCAP10(2014) 062 [1405.7370]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    Inelastic Boosted Dark Matter at Direct Detection Experiments

    G.F. Giudice, D. Kim, J.-C. Park and S. Shin,Inelastic Boosted Dark Matter at Direct Detection Experiments,Phys. Lett. B780(2018) 543 [1712.07126]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Geller and Z

    M. Geller and Z. Heller-Algazi,Boosting asymmetric charged DM via thermalization,JHEP 03(2023) 184 [2210.03126]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Acevedo, J

    J.F. Acevedo, J. Berger and P.B. Denton,Dark matter raining on DUNE and other large volume detectors,JHEP11(2024) 011 [2407.01670]

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Acevedo and A

    J.F. Acevedo and A. Ritz,Binary-boosted Dark Matter,2603.08781

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Hairer, C

    E. Hairer, C. Lubich and G. Wanner,Geometric Numerical Integration: Structure-Preserving Algorithms for Ordinary Differential Equations, vol. 31 ofSpringer Series in Computational Mathematics, Springer, 2nd ed. (2006), 10.1007/3-540-30666-8

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-30666-8 2006

  29. [29]

    An Improved Distance and Mass Estimate for Sgr A* from a Multistar Orbit Analysis

    A. Boehle, A.M. Ghez, R. Schödel, L. Meyer, S. Yelda, S. Albers et al.,An Improved Distance and Mass Estimate for Sgr A* from a Multistar Orbit Analysis,The Astrophysical Journal 830(2016) 17 [1607.05726]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    An Update on Monitoring Stellar Orbits in the Galactic Center

    S. Gillessen, P.M. Plewa, F. Eisenhauer, R. Sari, I. Waisberg, M. Habibi et al.,An Update on Monitoring Stellar Orbits in the Galactic Center,The Astrophysical Journal837(2017) 30 [1611.09144]. [31]Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration,First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Mi...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    Stellar dynamics in the central arcsecond of our galaxy

    R. Schodel, T. Ott, R. Genzel, A. Eckart, N. Mouawad and T. Alexander,Stellar dynamics in the central arcsecond of our Galaxy,Astrophys. J.596(2003) 1015 [astro-ph/0306214]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  32. [32]

    Bahcall and R.A

    J.N. Bahcall and R.A. Wolf,The star distribution around a massive black hole in a globular cluster. II. Unequal star masses.,The Astrophysical Journal216(1977) 883

    1977

  33. [33]

    Models of Galaxies with Central Black Holes: Adiabatic Growth in Spherical Galaxies

    G.D. Quinlan, L. Hernquist and S. Sigurdsson,Models of Galaxies with Central Black Holes: Adiabatic Growth in Spherical Galaxies,Astrophys. J.440(1995) 554 [astro-ph/9407005]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  34. [34]

    Young,Numerical models of star clusters with a central black hole

    P. Young,Numerical models of star clusters with a central black hole. I - Adiabatic models., Astrophysical Journal242(1980) 1232

    1980

  35. [35]

    The effect of mass-segregation on gravitational wave sources near massive black holes

    C. Hopman and T. Alexander,The effect of mass-segregation on gravitational wave sources near massive black holes,Astrophys. J. Lett.645(2006) L133 [astro-ph/0603324]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  36. [36]

    Strong mass segregation around a massive black hole

    T. Alexander and C. Hopman,Strong mass segregation around a massive black hole, Astrophys. J.697(2009) 1861 [0808.3150]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  37. [37]

    The impact of realistic models of mass segregation on the event rate of extreme-mass ratio inspirals and cusp re-growth

    P. Amaro-Seoane and M. Preto,The impact of realistic models of mass segregation on the event rate of extreme-mass ratio inspirals and cusp re-growth,Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 094017 [1010.5781]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  38. [38]

    Direct N-body simulation of the Galactic centre

    T. Panamarev, A. Just, R. Spurzem, P. Berczik, L. Wang and M. Arca Sedda,DirectN-body simulation of the Galactic centre,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.484(2019) 3279 [1805.02153]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    The distribution of stars around the Milky Way's black hole III: Comparison with simulations

    H. Baumgardt, P. Amaro-Seoane and R. Schödel,The distribution of stars around the Milky Way’s central black hole. III. Comparison with simulations,Astronomy and Astrophysics609 (2018) A28 [1701.03818]. – 30 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    Zhang and P

    F. Zhang and P. Amaro Seoane,Monte Carlo Stellar Dynamics near Massive Black Holes: Two-dimensional Fokker-Planck Solutions of Multiple Mass Components,The Astrophysical Journal961(2024) 232 [2306.03924]

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    The distribution of old stars around the Milky Way's central black hole I: Star counts

    E. Gallego-Cano, R. Schödel, H. Dong, F. Nogueras-Lara, A.T. Gallego-Calvente, P. Amaro-Seoane et al.,The distribution of stars around the Milky Way’s central black hole. I. Deep star counts,Astronomy and Astrophysics609(2018) A26 [1701.03816]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Spectroscopic Detection of a Cusp of Late-type Stars around the Central Black Hole in the Milky Way

    M. Habibi, S. Gillessen, O. Pfuhl, F. Eisenhauer, P.M. Plewa, S. von Fellenberg et al., Spectroscopic Detection of a Cusp of Late-type Stars around the Central Black Hole in the Milky Way,The Astrophysical Journal Letters872(2019) L15 [1902.07219]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    Hailey, K

    C.J. Hailey, K. Mori, F.E. Bauer, M.E. Berkowitz, J. Hong and B.J. Hord,A density cusp of quiescent X-ray binaries in the central parsec of the Galaxy,Nature556(2018) 70

    2018

  44. [44]

    Z. Chen, T. Do, A.M. Ghez, M.W. Hosek, A. Feldmeier-Krause, D.S. Chu et al.,The Star Formation History of the Milky Way’s Nuclear Star Cluster,The Astrophysical Journal944 (2023) 79 [2212.01397]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Ryde and M

    N. Ryde and M. Schultheis,Chemical abundances of M giants in the Galactic centre: A single metal-rich population with low [α/Fe],Astronomy & Astrophysics573(2015) A14

    2015

  46. [46]

    T. Do, W. Kerzendorf, N. Winsor, M. Støstad, M.R. Morris, J.R. Lu et al.,Discovery of Low-metallicity Stars in the Central Parsec of the Milky Way,The Astrophysical Journal809 (2015) 143 [1506.07891]. [49]GRA VITYcollaboration,Improving constraints on the extended mass distribution in the Galactic center with stellar orbits,Astron. Astrophys.692(2024) A24...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  47. [47]

    Bordoni et al.,Impact of a granular mass distribution on the orbit of S2 in the Galactic center,Astron

    M.S. Bordoni et al.,Impact of a granular mass distribution on the orbit of S2 in the Galactic center,Astron. Astrophys.701(2025) A89 [2507.01510]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos

    J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White,The Structure of cold dark matter halos, Astrophys. J.462(1996) 563 [astro-ph/9508025]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  49. [49]

    A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering

    J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White,A Universal density profile from hierarchical clustering,Astrophys. J.490(1997) 493 [astro-ph/9611107]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  50. [50]

    M. Pato, F. Iocco and G. Bertone,Dynamical constraints on the dark matter distribution in the Milky Way,JCAP12(2015) 001 [1504.06324]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    Halo Contraction Effect in Hydrodynamic Simulations of Galaxy Formation

    O.Y. Gnedin, D. Ceverino, N.Y. Gnedin, A.A. Klypin, A.V. Kravtsov, R. Levine et al.,Halo Contraction Effect in Hydrodynamic Simulations of Galaxy Formation,arXiv e-prints(2011) arXiv:1108.5736 [1108.5736]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  52. [52]

    A mass-dependent density profile for dark matter haloes including the influence of galaxy formation

    A. Di Cintio, C.B. Brook, A.A. Dutton, A.V. Macciò, G.S. Stinson and A. Knebe,A mass-dependent density profile for dark matter haloes including the influence of galaxy formation,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.441(2014) 2986 [1404.5959]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  53. [53]

    Rotation Curve and Mass Distribution in the Galactic Center --- From Black Hole to Entire Galaxy ---

    Y. Sofue,Rotation Curve and Mass Distribution in the Galactic Center -From Black Hole to Entire Galaxy-,Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan65(2013) 118 [1307.8241]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  54. [54]

    Straub, M

    Gravity Collaboration, O. Straub, M. Bauböck, R. Abuter, N. Aimar, P. Amaro Seoane et al., Where intermediate-mass black holes could hide in the Galactic Centre. A full parameter study with the S2 orbit,Astronomy & Astrophysics672(2023) A63 [2303.04067]

    work page arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Strokov, G

    V. Strokov, G. Fragione and E. Berti,LISA constraints on an intermediate-mass black hole in the Galactic Centre,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.524(2023) 2033 [2303.00015]

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    Dark Matter Velocity Distributions for Direct Detection: Astrophysical Uncertainties are Smaller Than They Appear

    D. Folsom, C. Blanco, M. Lisanti, L. Necib, M. Vogelsberger and L. Hernquist,Dark Matter Velocity Distributions for Direct Detection: Astrophysical Uncertainties Are Smaller Than They Appear,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 211004 [2505.07924]. – 31 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Reid and A

    M.J. Reid and A. Brunthaler,The Proper Motion of Sagittarius A*. III. The Case for a Supermassive Black Hole,The Astrophysical Journal892(2020) 39 [2001.04386]

    work page arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    Milky Way Mass Models for Orbit Calculations

    A. Irrgang, B. Wilcox, E. Tucker and L. Schiefelbein,Milky Way mass models for orbit calculations,Astronomy and Astrophysics549(2013) A137 [1211.4353]. [62]LZcollaboration,Searches for Light Dark Matter and Evidence of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering of Solar Neutrinos with the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, 2512.08065. [63]PandaXcollaboration,S...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  59. [59]

    Raj and B

    N. Raj and B. Mondal,Neutrino roof: Single-scatter cross section ceilings in dark matter direct detection experiments,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 095023 [2406.17015]. [67]DarkSidecollaboration,Calibration of the liquid argon ionization response to low energy electronic and nuclear recoils with DarkSide-50,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 082005 [2107.08087]. [68]NEWS-Gcol...

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Stellar cooling bounds on new light particles: plasma mixing effects

    E. Hardy and R. Lasenby,Stellar cooling bounds on new light particles: plasma mixing effects, JHEP02(2017) 033 [1611.05852]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  61. [61]

    H. An, M. Pospelov and J. Pradler,New stellar constraints on dark photons,Phys. Lett. B 725(2013) 190 [1302.3884]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  62. [62]

    Warm Dark Matter as a solution to the small scale crisis: new constraints from high redshift Lyman-alpha forest data

    M. Viel, G.D. Becker, J.S. Bolton and M.G. Haehnelt,Warm dark matter as a solution to the small scale crisis: New constraints from high redshift Lyman-αforest data,Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 043502 [1306.2314]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  63. [63]

    Sabti, J

    N. Sabti, J. Alvey, M. Escudero, M. Fairbairn and D. Blas,Refined Bounds on MeV-scale Thermal Dark Sectors from BBN and the CMB,JCAP01(2020) 004 [1910.01649]

    work page arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    Buen-Abad, R

    M.A. Buen-Abad, R. Essig, D. McKeen and Y.-M. Zhong,Cosmological constraints on dark matter interactions with ordinary matter,Phys. Rept.961(2022) 1 [2107.12377]. – 32 –

    work page arXiv 2022

  65. [65]

    G. Duda, A. Kemper and P. Gondolo,Model Independent Form Factors for Spin Independent Neutralino-Nucleon Scattering from Elastic Electron Scattering Data,JCAP04(2007) 012 [hep-ph/0608035]. [81]DarkSidecollaboration,Search for Dark-Matter–Nucleon Interactions via Migdal Effect with DarkSide-50,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 101001 [2207.11967]. [82]PandaXcollab...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  66. [66]

    P. Klos, J. Menéndez, D. Gazit and A. Schwenk,Large-scale nuclear structure calculations for spin-dependent WIMP scattering with chiral effective field theory currents,Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 083516 [1304.7684]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  67. [67]

    Bozorgnia, M

    N. Bozorgnia, M. Chen, G.B. Gelmini, A.C. Kamaha and Y. Xu,Spin-dependent dark matter interactions at loop-level in Ar and Xe,JCAP04(2025) 066 [2408.13664]. [87]CRESSTcollaboration,Testing spin-dependent dark matter interactions with lithium aluminate targets in CRESST-III,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 092008 [2207.07640]

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Inelastic Dark Matter

    D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner,Inelastic dark matter,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 043502 [hep-ph/0101138]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  69. [69]

    Inelastic Dark Matter in Light of DAMA/LIBRA

    S. Chang, G.D. Kribs, D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner,Inelastic Dark Matter in Light of DAMA/LIBRA,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 043513 [0807.2250]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  70. [70]

    Exciting Dark Matter and the INTEGRAL/SPI 511 keV signal

    D.P. Finkbeiner and N. Weiner,Exciting Dark Matter and the INTEGRAL/SPI 511 keV signal,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 083519 [astro-ph/0702587]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  71. [71]

    The galactic 511 keV line from electroweak scale WIMPs

    M. Pospelov and A. Ritz,The galactic 511 keV line from electroweak scale WIMPs,Phys. Lett. B651(2007) 208 [hep-ph/0703128]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  72. [72]

    Direct Detection of Multi-component Secluded WIMPs

    B. Batell, M. Pospelov and A. Ritz,Direct Detection of Multi-component Secluded WIMPs, Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 115019 [0903.3396]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  73. [73]

    Scalar Split WIMPs in the Future Direct Detection Experiments

    K. Ghorbani and H. Ghorbani,Scalar split WIMPs in future direct detection experiments, Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 055012 [1501.00206]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  74. [74]

    Self-interacting Dark Matter Without Direct Detection Constraints

    Y. Zhang,Self-interacting Dark Matter Without Direct Detection Constraints,Phys. Dark Univ.15(2017) 82 [1611.03492]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  75. [75]

    Alvarez and H.-B

    G. Alvarez and H.-B. Yu,Astrophysical probes of inelastic dark matter with a light mediator, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 043002 [1911.11114]

    work page arXiv 2020

  76. [76]

    Gamma-Rays and Gravitational Waves from Inelastic Higgs Portal Dark Matter

    D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic, D. Rocha and S. Roy,Gamma-Rays and Gravitational Waves from Inelastic Higgs Portal Dark Matter,2507.22975. [97]LZcollaboration,Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 011802 [2410.17036]. [98]PandaXcollaboration,Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    The Inelastic Frontier: Discovering Dark Matter at High Recoil Energy

    J. Bramante, P.J. Fox, G.D. Kribs and A. Martin,Inelastic frontier: Discovering dark matter at high recoil energy,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 115026 [1608.02662]. – 33 – [101]CRESSTcollaboration,Results on light dark matter particles with a low-threshold CRESST-II detector,Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 25 [1509.01515]. [102]PICOcollaboration,Dark matter search results...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  78. [78]

    Digman, C.V

    M.C. Digman, C.V. Cappiello, J.F. Beacom, C.M. Hirata and A.H.G. Peter,Not as big as a barn: Upper bounds on dark matter-nucleus cross sections,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 063013 [1907.10618]

    work page arXiv 2019

  79. [79]

    Loosely bound composite dark matter,

    J.F. Acevedo, Y. Boukhtouchen, J. Bramante, C. Cappiello, G. Mohlabeng and N. Tyagi, Loosely bound composite dark matter,JCAP03(2025) 013 [2408.03983]

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    Capture of Inelastic Dark Matter in White Dwarves

    M. McCullough and M. Fairbairn,Capture of Inelastic Dark Matter in White Dwarves,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 083520 [1001.2737]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

Showing first 80 references.