Anderson et al. Reply (to the Comment by Katz on Pioneer 10/11)

Anthony S. Liu; Eunice L. Lau; John D. Anderson; Michael Martin Nieto; Philip A. Laing; Slava G. Turyshev

REVIEW

Anderson et al. Reply (to the Comment by Katz on Pioneer 10/11)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv gr-qc/9906112 v1 pith:F7E54ANL submitted 1999-06-29 gr-qc astro-ph

John D. Anderson , Philip A. Laing , Eunice L. Lau , Anthony S. Liu , Michael Martin Nieto , Slava G. Turyshev This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qcastro-ph

keywords heatkatzpioneerandersonanisotropicanomalyantennaeback

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments

read the original abstract

We conclude that Katz's proposal (anisotropic heat reflection off of the back of the spacecraft high-gain antennae, the heat coming from the RTGs) does not provide enough power and so can not explain the Pioneer anomaly.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools