Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparative study of LaNiO$_3$/LaAlO$_3$ heterostructures grown by pulsed laser deposition and oxide molecular beam epitaxy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1701.05366 v1 pith:F7KVGMZN submitted 2017-01-19 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords depositionbeamepitaxygrowthheterostructureshigherlasermolecular
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Variations in growth conditions associated with different deposition techniques can greatly affect the phase stability and defect structure of complex oxide heterostructures. We synthesized superlattices of the paramagnetic metal LaNiO3 and the large band gap insulator LaAlO3 by atomic layer-by-layer molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) and pulsed laser deposition (PLD) and compared their crystallinity, microstructure as revealed by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy images and resistivity. The MBE samples show a higher density of stacking faults, but smoother interfaces and generally higher electrical conductivity. Our study identifies the opportunities and challenges of MBE and PLD growth and serves as a general guide for the choice of deposition technique for perovskite oxides.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools