Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 50 references

Transforming Antarctic Ice into a Cherenkov Neutrino Detector

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review argues that the experimental program to build a kilometer-scale neutrino telescope in Antarctic ice has succeeded, making neutrino astronomy a working observational field.

desk verdict A competent, clearly written review of IceCube's construction and main results; no new science, but a useful and accurate summary. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15329 v1 pith:FAXR7RBT submitted 2024-11-22 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IMphysics.ins-det

Francis Halzen , John Kelley This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.IMphysics.ins-det
keywords neutrinoastronomyCherenkovdetectorAntarcticicecosmicneutrinosmultimessengeractivegalacticnucleiplaneSouthPole
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Natural Antarctic ice can serve as both the target and the detector medium for high-energy neutrino astronomy. The paper describes how the South Pole experiment embedded 5,484 digital optical modules in a cubic kilometer of ice at 1.5 kilometers depth, and how this detector records the Cherenkov light from neutrino interactions. Its central assertion is that neutrino astronomy is now viable, based on three observational results: a diffuse flux of TeV-to-PeV neutrinos coming from beyond our Galaxy, the first identified neutrino sources in active galaxies, and the first observation of the Milky Way in neutrinos. In short, the paper claims that the old idea of the neutrino as an astronomical messenger has been realized, and that a next generation of larger detectors should turn a handful of sources into a population.

What carries the argument

The mechanism that carries the argument is the Cherenkov detection chain. A neutrino interacting in the ice produces charged secondaries that emit Cherenkov light; the detector's 5,484 digital optical modules (DOMs), each a 10-inch photomultiplier tube in a glass pressure sphere with local digitization and roughly 2-nanosecond time stamping, record the light pattern, from which direction, energy, and flavor are inferred. Because the ice is itself the optical medium, the depth- and direction-dependent absorption and scattering lengths, measured with flasher boards and dust loggers and refined by photon-by-photon simulation, set the achievable angular and energy resolution, currently at or below 0.3 degrees for high-energy muon tracks and better than 15 percent in deposited energy for cascades. Atmospheric muons and neutrinos are the dominant background, suppressed by the Earth as a filter for upgoing events and by quality cuts and neural-network-based selection.

What would settle it

Compare the absolute pointing of the detector using the cosmic-ray Moon shadow: the Moon blocks cosmic rays, producing a well-defined deficit in the reconstructed muon map, and if the measured shadow position differs from the Moon's known position by more than the claimed sub-0.3-degree angular resolution, the ice-model calibration and with it the directional claims would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery presented is that a cubic kilometer of natural glacial ice, instrumented with self-contained optical sensors, is a working Cherenkov neutrino telescope whose data have made neutrino astronomy observational rather than conjectural. The paper's evidence is the published observations of a diffuse extragalactic neutrino flux outshining the highest-energy gamma-ray flux, resolved neutrino sources in active galaxies whose emission originates near their central supermassive black holes, and a faint Galactic-plane neutrino glow. On these results, the paper concludes that the experiment has established the viability of neutrino astronomy, and that multimessenger observations now provide tools for identifying the origin of the highest-energy cosmic particles reaching us from the universe.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the ice model, meaning the depth- and direction-dependent absorption and scattering parameters inferred from in situ light sources and dust loggers, is accurate enough that reconstructed neutrino directions and energies are unbiased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the reported results hold, neutrino astronomy is an established observational window: the diffuse cosmic neutrino flux is real, and it exceeds the energy carried by the highest-energy gamma rays.
  • The first resolved neutrino sources are active galaxies, with neutrino production attributed to proton acceleration in the dense core within about ten Schwarzschild radii of the central black hole, pinning the cosmic-ray acceleration site to the immediate vicinity of supermassive black holes.
  • The Milky Way appears in neutrinos only as a faint glow at about ten percent of the extragalactic flux, implying that our Galaxy lacks the source class that dominates the extragalactic neutrino sky, plausibly because its central black hole has been quiet for millions of years.
  • Because the absorption length of Cherenkov light in deep ice is long, string spacing can be doubled without severe performance loss, so a next-generation detector instrumenting more than 8 cubic kilometers should increase cosmic event rates from hundreds to thousands and identify sources currently near the 3-sigma level.
  • Machine-learning-based event selection and improved ice models have already increased cascade samples in the Galactic-plane direction by more than an order of magnitude, so reanalysis of archival data can continue to improve sensitivity without new hardware.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable prediction implied by the gamma-obscured source picture is that the neutrino sky should correlate with populations of active galaxies that are bright in hard X-ray or radio and dim at GeV-to-TeV gamma rays; this could be checked by cross-correlating the detector's event maps with such AGN samples.
  • If the ice-model calibration is correct, the same instrument can be used as a continuous glaciology monitor, since the detector's own light sources and sensors can track time-varying or depth-resolved ice properties.
  • The success of doubling string spacing to reach 8 cubic kilometers suggests a further cost trade-off is plausible: pushing spacing beyond 250 meters at the cost of low-energy sensitivity would buy even larger volume at TeV-to-PeV energies.
  • The paper's framing implies that the handful of neutrino sources found in a decade is a statistical limitation rather than a fundamental one; if the next-generation detector delivers the projected rate increase, the neutrino sky should transition from single-source detections to population studies within a few years.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review chapter by Halzen and Kelley describing how the IceCube Neutrino Observatory turned a cubic kilometer of Antarctic ice into a Cherenkov neutrino detector. After motivating neutrino astronomy and explaining the detection principle, the chapter covers the technical development: hot-water drilling, string deployment, the digital optical module, online data acquisition, calibration, and processing. It then summarizes IceCube's main physics results, including the discovery of a diffuse astrophysical neutrino flux, the identification of the first neutrino sources (NGC 1068, TXS 0506+056, and others), and the observation of the Galactic plane in neutrinos. The chapter closes with a discussion of complementarity with other neutrino telescopes and the future IceCube-Gen2 program. The central claim is that IceCube has established the viability of neutrino astronomy.

Significance. The chapter is a pedagogical review rather than a research paper; it contains no new derivations or data analyses. Its value depends on the accuracy with which it represents the published IceCube results and the clarity of its technical explanations. On those terms, the manuscript largely succeeds: the key quantitative claims (5,484 DOMs, 0.3 degree angular resolution for high-energy muon tracks, better-than-15% energy resolution for cascades, 98.3% DOM survival fraction) are consistent with the cited collaboration papers. The review also cites the primary peer-reviewed literature for the diffuse flux, TXS 0506+056, NGC 1068, and the Galactic plane, which supports the central claim. The accessible descriptions of the DOM hardware, the RAPCal timing calibration, and the ice-modeling approach are useful for a non-specialist audience. The manuscript is a reliable, well-referenced overview of IceCube's achievements, with only minor local inconsistencies that do not affect the main conclusion.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.1] The text says both that 'the failure rate after detector completion is less than one DOM per year' and that '98.3% of the original 5,484 modules are still operational after 13 years of full-detector operation,' with the survival curve in Fig. 8 showing a drop from 1.000 to about 0.983 over 2010-2024. These statements are numerically inconsistent: 1.7% of 5,484 is about 90 DOMs, which corresponds to roughly 7 failures per year over 13 years; even if the ~1% deployment/freeze-in failures are excluded, the post-completion rate is several DOMs per year. Please reconcile the text with the figure and the survival fraction, or clarify the exact time interval and which failures are included.
  2. [Sec. 5] The list of 'the first high-energy neutrino sources' includes NGC 4151 and PKS 1424+240, citing Ref. [45], which is an ICRC proceeding reporting a search for neutrino emission from hard X-ray AGN. As of the cited work, these are likely candidate detections with lower significance than NGC 1068 or TXS 0506+056. Please clarify their observational status (e.g., 'candidate sources' vs. 'established sources') so that the text does not overstate the current evidence.
  3. [References] Ref. [9] and Ref. [35] are the same paper (Roberts, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 259); Ref. [6] and Ref. [19] are the same JINST instrumentation paper. Please merge duplicates or cross-reference them to streamline the bibliography.
  4. [General] The chapter tagline reads 'update of previous edition, reprint.' It would help the reader to know the prior edition or the nature of the update, since this is not stated anywhere else in the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the chapter reviews peer-reviewed IceCube results; author self-citations are independent experimental evidence, not load-bearing derivations.

full rationale

This is an invited review chapter, not a derivation paper. It contains no fitted parameters, no equations whose outputs are reinserted as inputs, and no prediction that is forced by construction. The central claim that IceCube has established the viability of neutrino astronomy is supported by citations to published collaboration results, including the diffuse astrophysical flux (Science 342, 1242856; PRL 113, 101101), NGC 1068 (Science 378, 538), TXS 0506+056 (Science 361, eaat1378 and 147-151), and the Galactic plane (Science 380, adc9818). Several of these papers are co-authored by the chapter authors, but self-citation is normal in an experiment review and the cited claims were established by the full collaboration and are externally falsifiable; they are not defined into existence by this chapter. Detector performance claims (angular resolution, energy resolution, operation time) are framed as summaries of instrumentation papers (JINST 12 P03012; NIM A618 139; JINST 15 P06032) and in situ ice-calibration measurements (The Cryosphere 18, 75-102), not as new results derived here. The weakest premise noted by the reader, the correctness of the ice model used in reconstruction, is a real experimental systematic but it is an assumption inherited from the underlying experiment, not an assumption this review introduces or discharges; a review's accuracy depends on faithfully representing that literature, which it does. The only concrete issue found is an internal numerical tension in Sec. 2.1: the text says 'the failure rate after detector completion is less than one DOM per year, and 98.3% of the original 5,484 modules are still operational after 13 years,' which implies roughly 93 total failures, or about 7 per year, unless the sentence counts only post-deployment failures. This is an editorial inconsistency, not a circular step, and it does not affect the review's central verdict. No circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review; it introduces no new free parameters, no new axioms beyond standard physics assumptions, and no invented entities. The central claims rest on the cited experimental results of the IceCube collaboration.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The Standard Model of particle physics correctly describes neutrino interactions and Cherenkov light production in ice.
    The detector's signal interpretation relies on Standard Model cross sections and Cherenkov emission; this underpins all reconstructions described in Sec. 1.2 and 2.4.
  • domain assumption The depth-dependent optical properties of Antarctic ice are accurately determined by in situ measurements and photon simulations.
    Direction and energy reconstruction depend on the ice model; the paper describes these measurements in Sec. 1.3 and 2.3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transforming Antarctic Ice into a Cherenkov Neutrino Detector." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FAXR7RBT

@misc{pith2026241115329,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transforming Antarctic Ice into a Cherenkov Neutrino Detector},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FAXR7RBT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15329}
}
read the original abstract

In this chapter, we describe how the IceCube Neutrino Observatory transformed a cubic kilometer of natural ice at the geographic South Pole into a neutrino telescope. The concept of using the neutrino as an astronomical messenger is as old as the neutrino itself, and the challenge to open this new window on the high-energy universe was technological in nature. We discuss how IceCube was constructed and how the detector operates, including some detail on the 5,484 optical sensors that comprise the array. We highlight some of the primary results of the experiment, including the discovery of a diffuse flux of high-energy neutrinos reaching us from the cosmos, the observation of the first high-energy neutrino sources in the sky, and the observation of our Galaxy in neutrinos.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [35]

    Roberts, The Birth of high-energy neutrino astronomy: A Personal history of the DUMAND project, Rev.Mod.Phys

    A. Roberts, The Birth of high-energy neutrino astronomy: A Personal history of the DUMAND project, Rev.Mod.Phys. 64 (1992) 259–312. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.64.259

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.64.259 1992

  2. [1]

    M. G. Aartsen, et al., Evidence for High-Energy Extraterrestrial Neutrinos at the IceCube Detector, Science 342 (2013) 1242856. arXiv: 1311.5238, doi:10.1126/science.1242856

    arXiv 2013

  3. [2]

    M. G. Aartsen, et al., Multimessenger observations of a flaring blazar coincident with high-energy neutrino IceCube-170922A, Science 361 (6398) (2018) eaat1378. arXiv:1807.08816, doi:10.1126/science.aat1378

    arXiv 2018

  4. [3]

    M. G. Aartsen, et al., Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert, Science 361 (6398) (2018) 147–151. arXiv:1807.08794, doi:10.1126/science.aat2890

    arXiv 2018

  5. [4]

    Abbasi, et al., Evidence for neutrino emission from the nearby active galaxy NGC 1068, Science 378 (6619) (2022) 538–543

    R. Abbasi, et al., Evidence for neutrino emission from the nearby active galaxy NGC 1068, Science 378 (6619) (2022) 538–543. arXiv: 2211.09972, doi:10.1126/science.abg3395

    arXiv 2022

  6. [5]

    Abbasi, et al., Observation of high-energy neutrinos from the Galactic plane, Science 380 (6652) (2023) adc9818

    R. Abbasi, et al., Observation of high-energy neutrinos from the Galactic plane, Science 380 (6652) (2023) adc9818. arXiv:2307.04427, doi:10.1126/science.adc9818

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Halzen, Astroparticle physics with high energy neutrinos: from Amanda to IceCube, Eur

    F . Halzen, Astroparticle physics with high energy neutrinos: from Amanda to IceCube, Eur. Phys. J. C46 (2006) 669–687.arXiv:astro-ph/ 0602132, doi:10.1140/epjc/s2006-02536-4

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s2006-02536-4 2006

  8. [8]

    Yuan, Improving the angular resolution in icecube cascade reconstruction, TeV Particle Astrophysics 2017 (TeVPA2017), Columbus, Ohio, USA (2017)

    T. Yuan, Improving the angular resolution in icecube cascade reconstruction, TeV Particle Astrophysics 2017 (TeVPA2017), Columbus, Ohio, USA (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 50 references
  1. [10]

    Berezinsky, G

    V. Berezinsky, G. Zatsepin, Cosmic rays at ultrahigh-energies (neutrino?), Phys.Lett. B28 (1969) 423–424. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(69) 90341-4

    1969 doi

  2. [11]

    Stecker, Ultrahigh energy photons, electrons and neutrinos, the microwave background, and the universal cosmic ray hypothesis, Astro- phys

    F . Stecker, Ultrahigh energy photons, electrons and neutrinos, the microwave background, and the universal cosmic ray hypothesis, Astro- phys. Space Sci. 20 (1973) 47–57. doi:10.1007/BF00645585

    1973 doi

  3. [12]

    Collaboration, et al., South pole glacial climate reconstruction from multi-borehole laser particulate stratigraphy, Journal of Glaciology 59 (218) (2013) 1117–1128

    I. Collaboration, et al., South pole glacial climate reconstruction from multi-borehole laser particulate stratigraphy, Journal of Glaciology 59 (218) (2013) 1117–1128

    2013

  4. [13]

    Abbasi, et al., Calibration and Characterization of the IceCube Photomultiplier Tube, Nucl.Instrum.Meth

    R. Abbasi, et al., Calibration and Characterization of the IceCube Photomultiplier Tube, Nucl.Instrum.Meth. A618 (2010) 139–152. arXiv: 1002.2442, doi:10.1016/j.nima.2010.03.102

    2010 arXiv

  5. [14]

    Abbasi, et al., The IceCube Data Acquisition System: Signal Capture, Digitization, and Timestamping, Nucl.Instrum.Meth

    R. Abbasi, et al., The IceCube Data Acquisition System: Signal Capture, Digitization, and Timestamping, Nucl.Instrum.Meth. A601 (2009) 294–316. arXiv:0810.4930, doi:10.1016/j.nima.2009.01.001

    2009 arXiv

  6. [15]

    Abbasi, et al., IceCube Sensitivity for Low-Energy Neutrinos from Nearby Supernovae, Astron

    R. Abbasi, et al., IceCube Sensitivity for Low-Energy Neutrinos from Nearby Supernovae, Astron. Astrophys. 535 (2011) A109, [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 563, C1 (2014)]. arXiv:1108.0171, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117810e

    2011 arXiv

  7. [16]

    K ¨opke, I

    L. K ¨opke, I. Collaboration1, Improved detection of supernovae with the icecube observatory, in: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1029, IOP Publishing, 2018, p. 012001

    2018

  8. [17]

    Antonioli, R

    P . Antonioli, R. T. Fienberg, F . Fleurot, Y . Fukuda, W. Fulgione, A. Habig, J. Heise, A. B. McDonald, C. Mills, T. Namba, et al., Snews: The supernova early warning system, New Journal of Physics 6 (1) (2004) 114

    2004

  9. [18]

    M. G. Aartsen, et al., The IceCube Realtime Alert System, Astropart. Phys. 92 (2017) 30–41. arXiv:1612.06028, doi:10.1016/j. astropartphys.2017.05.002

    2017 arXiv

  10. [19]

    M. G. Aartsen, et al., The IceCube Neutrino Observatory: Instrumentation and Online Systems, JINST 12 (03) (2017) P03012. arXiv: 1612.05093, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/03/P03012

    2017 arXiv

  11. [20]

    M. G. Aartsen, et al., Energy Reconstruction Methods in the IceCube Neutrino Telescope, Journal of Instrumentation 9 (2014) P03009. arXiv:1311.4767, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/03/P03009

    2014 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Aartsen, M

    M. Aartsen, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, C. Alispach, K. Andeen, T. Anderson, I. Ansseau, et al., In-situ calibration of the single-photoelectron charge response of the icecube photomultiplier tubes, Journal of Instrumentation 15 (06) (2020) P06032

    2020

  13. [22]

    Abbasi, M

    R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, N. Aggarwal, J. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, J.-M. Alameddine, A. A. Alves Junior, N. M. B. Amin, et al., In situ estimation of ice crystal properties at the south pole using led calibration data from the icecube neutrino observatory, The C...

    2024

  14. [23]

    M. G. Aartsen, R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, D. Altmann, C. Arguelles, J. Auffenberg, X. Bai, et al., The iceprod framework: Distributed data processing for the icecube neutrino observatory, Journal of parallel and distributed computing 75 (2015) 19...

    2015

  15. [24]

    Aartsen, K

    M. Aartsen, K. Abraham, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, D. Altmann, K. Andeen, T. Anderson, et al., First search for dark matter annihilations in the earth with the icecube detector: Icecube collaboration, The European Physical Journal C 77 (2017) 1–11

    2017

  16. [25]

    M. G. Aartsen, et al., Search for Neutrinos from Dark Matter Self-Annihilations in the center of the Milky Way with 3 years of Ice- Cube/DeepCore, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (9) (2017) 627. arXiv:1705.08103, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5213-y

    2017 arXiv

  17. [26]

    Abbasi, M

    R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, J. Alameddine, C. Alispach, A. Alves Jr, N. Amin, et al., Search for gev-scale dark matter annihilation in the sun with icecube deepcore, Physical Review D 105 (6) (2022) 062004

    2022

  18. [27]

    I. Collaboration, et al., Measurement of atmospheric neutrino oscillation parameters using convolutional neural networks with 9.3 years of data in icecube deepcore, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.02163 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  19. [28]

    M. G. Aartsen, et al., Neutrino Interferometry for High-Precision Tests of Lorentz Symmetry with IceCube, Nature Phys. 14 (2018) 961. arXiv:1709.03434, doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0172-2

    2018 arXiv

  20. [29]

    Babson, et al., Cosmic Ray Muons in the Deep Ocean, Phys.Rev

    J. Babson, et al., Cosmic Ray Muons in the Deep Ocean, Phys.Rev. D42 (1990) 3613–3620. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3613

    1990 doi

  21. [30]

    I. A. Belolaptikov, et al., The Baikal underwater neutrino telescope: Design, performance and first results, Astropart. Phys. 7 (1997) 263–

    1997

  22. [31]

    Aggouras, et al., A measurement of the cosmic-ray muon flux with a module of the NESTOR neutrino telescope, Astropart.Phys

    G. Aggouras, et al., A measurement of the cosmic-ray muon flux with a module of the NESTOR neutrino telescope, Astropart.Phys. 23 (2005) 377–392. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2005.02.001

    2005 doi

  23. [32]

    Aguilar, et al., First results of the Instrumentation Line for the deep-sea ANTARES neutrino telescope, Astropart.Phys

    J. Aguilar, et al., First results of the Instrumentation Line for the deep-sea ANTARES neutrino telescope, Astropart.Phys. 26 (2006) 314–

    2006

  24. [33]

    Migneco, Progress and latest results from Baikal, Nestor, NEMO and KM3NeT, J.Phys.Conf.Ser

    E. Migneco, Progress and latest results from Baikal, Nestor, NEMO and KM3NeT, J.Phys.Conf.Ser. 136 (2008) 022048. doi:10.1088/ 1742-6596/136/2/022048

    2008

  25. [34]

    Adrian-Martinez, et al., Letter of intent for KM3NeT 2.0, J

    S. Adrian-Martinez, et al., Letter of intent for KM3NeT 2.0, J. Phys. G43 (8) (2016) 084001. arXiv:1601.07459, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/ 43/8/084001

    2016 arXiv

  26. [36]

    T. K. Gaisser, F . Halzen, T. Stanev, Particle astrophysics with high-energy neutrinos, Phys.Rept. 258 (1995) 173–236. arXiv:hep-ph/ 9410384, doi:10.1016/0370-1573(95)00003-Y

    1995 doi

  27. [37]

    A. D. Avrorin, et al., Status and recent results of the BAIKAL-GVD project, Phys. Part. Nucl. 46 (2) (2015) 211–221. doi:10.1134/ S1063779615020033

    2015

  28. [38]

    Z. P . Y e, et al., Proposal for a neutrino telescope in South China Sea (7 2022).arXiv:2207.04519

    2022

  29. [39]

    Zhang, Y

    H. Zhang, Y . Cui, Y . Huang, S. Lin, Y . Liu, Z. Qiu, C. Shao, Y . Shi, C. Xie, L. Y ang, A proposed deep sea Neutrino Observatory in the Nanhai (8 2024). arXiv:2408.05122

    2024 arXiv

  30. [40]

    Huang, Z

    T.-Q. Huang, Z. Cao, M. Chen, J. Liu, Z. Wang, X. Y ou, Y . Qi, Proposal for the High Energy Neutrino Telescope, PoS ICRC2023 (2023)

    2023

  31. [41]

    Spiering, Towards High-Energy Neutrino Astronomy

    C. Spiering, Towards High-Energy Neutrino Astronomy. A Historical Review, Eur. Phys. J. H37 (2012) 515–565. arXiv:1207.4952, doi: 10.1140/epjh/e2012-30014-2

    2012 arXiv

  32. [42]

    M. G. Aartsen, et al., Observation of High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos in Three Y ears of IceCube Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 101101. arXiv:1405.5303, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.101101

    2014 arXiv

  33. [43]

    K. Fang, J. S. Gallagher, F . Halzen, The TeV Diffuse Cosmic Neutrino Spectrum and the Nature of Astrophysical Neutrino Sources, Astrophys. J. 933 (2) (2022) 190. arXiv:2205.03740, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7649

    2022 arXiv

  34. [44]

    K. Fang, J. S. Gallagher, F . Halzen, The Milky Way revealed to be a neutrino desert by the IceCube Galactic plane observation, Nature Astron. 8 (2) (2024) 241–246. arXiv:2306.17275, doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02128-0

    2024 arXiv

  35. [45]

    G. C. Privon, et al., Search for high-energy neutrino emission from hard X-ray AGN with IceCube, PoS ICRC2023 (2023) 1032. arXiv: 2307.15349, doi:10.22323/1.444.1032

    2023 arXiv

  36. [46]

    Ishihara, The icecube upgrade–design and science goals, arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.09441 (2019)

    A. Ishihara, The icecube upgrade–design and science goals, arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.09441 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  37. [47]

    M. G. Aartsen, et al., IceCube-Gen2: the window to the extreme Universe, J. Phys. G 48 (6) (2021) 060501. arXiv:2008.04323, doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/abbd48

    2021

  38. [48]

    doi:10.17226/26141

    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2023. doi:10.17226/26141. URL https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/26141/pathways-to-discovery-in-as...

    2023 doi

  39. [49]

    Asai, et al., Exploring the Quantum Universe: Pathways to Innovation and Discovery in Particle Physics (12 2023)

    S. Asai, et al., Exploring the Quantum Universe: Pathways to Innovation and Discovery in Particle Physics (12 2023). arXiv:2407.19176, doi:10.2172/2368847

    2023 arXiv

  40. [282]

    doi:10.1016/S0927-6505(97)00022-4

    doi

  41. [324]

    arXiv:astro-ph/0606229, doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2006.07.004

    2006 arXiv

  42. [1080]

    doi:10.22323/1.444.1080

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.