Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 85 references

Nonreciprocal Superconducting Transport from Chiral Edge States

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Asymmetric edge termination alone creates a Josephson diode, even when the bulk is inversion-symmetric.

desk verdict Genuinely new boundary-controlled route to the Josephson diode, but the central valley-filter robustness is asserted, not shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.18159 v1 pith:FAZUSTJS submitted 2026-07-20 cond-mat.supr-con

Jin-Xing Hou , Yan-Song Song , James Jun He , Song-Bo Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con PACS 74.50.+r73.43.-f
keywords chiraledgestatesJosephsondiodeeffectnonreciprocalsupercurrentkagomeantiferromagnetboundaryterminationAndreevspectrumCherninsulatorsuperconducting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a boundary-controlled mechanism for nonreciprocal superconducting transport: in a Josephson junction made from a chiral Chern insulator, the way the lattice terminates at the two transverse edges can make the junction act as a superconducting diode even though the bulk electronic structure is inversion-symmetric. Focusing on chiral kagome antiferromagnets, the authors show that out-of-plane spin canting opens a Chern gap with two co-propagating edge modes, and that different sublattice terminations select different valleys at opposite edges, giving the edges different dispersions and Fermi velocities. This boundary asymmetry is then converted into longitudinal nonreciprocity: asymmetric Andreev spectra, unequal forward/backward critical currents (Josephson diode effect), and direction-dependent Fraunhofer interference. A sympathetic reader would care because it points to edge engineering, not bulk asymmetry, as a tunable knob for dissipationless rectification, and because it suggests a generic route applicable to other Chern insulators.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the chiral edge state of a high-Chern-number insulator, combined with the sublattice-valley locking of the kagome bands. Edge termination acts as the control: by exposing one sublattice (C) or two (A/B), the boundary selects which valley (K or K') carries the low-energy edge mode; this selection is what makes opposite edges inequivalent when terminations differ. The work is carried by a tight-binding Hamiltonian with a coplanar 120-degree spin texture plus out-of-plane canting Mz, and transport is computed via Green functions in an SNS junction.

What would settle it

A direct test is to fabricate two SNS junctions on the same chiral kagome antiferromagnet film, one with symmetric (11 or 22) and one with asymmetric (12) transverse termination, and compare the phase-dependent supercurrent: if the asymmetric junction does not show E(phi) ≠ E(-phi) and I_c^+ ≠ |I_c^-| with eta reversing under Mz reversal, while the symmetric one does, the mechanism is falsified. Alternatively, intentionally introducing edge roughness that should mix valleys and rebalance the edges would be expected to quench eta.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that transverse boundary asymmetry alone can govern longitudinal superconducting nonreciprocity. In a chiral kagome antiferromagnet with canted spins, the bulk bands acquire Chern number ±2 and support two chiral edge modes. The sublattice termination at each edge acts as a valley-selective filter: an A/B-terminated edge favors one valley, a C-terminated edge the opposite valley. When the two edges have different terminations, the symmetric relation E_upper(kx) = E_lower(-kx) breaks, the edge spectra become inequivalent, and the Josephson critical currents become direction-dependent. The paper demonstrates this in a lattice model with concrete signatures: E(phi) ≠ E(-phi

Load-bearing premise

The effect hinges on edge termination acting as a robust valley-selective filter; if realistic edge disorder, reconstruction, or interfacial scattering mixes valleys or restores equivalence between the two edges, the asymmetric edge spectra and the diode effect would be suppressed, and the calculation assumes clean, phase-coherent ballistic edge transport.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A Josephson diode can be realized with an inversion-symmetric normal region, simply by choosing asymmetric edge terminations.
  • The diode polarity is switched by reversing Mz (spin canting), with eta(Mz) = -eta(-Mz).
  • The effect persists even when bulk states contribute to transport, so a purely edge-only regime is not required.
  • The mechanism extends beyond kagome antiferromagnets to other Chern insulators, other fillings, and spin-orbit-coupling-induced gaps, as shown in the Supplemental Material.
  • Direction-dependent Fraunhofer patterns provide an experimentally accessible signature distinct from a uniform phi0 offset.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Edge disorder or reconstruction that mixes valleys would suppress the effect, so clean, atomically ordered terminations are the key practical challenge; this could be tested by comparing junctions with different edge roughness.
  • The valley-selective edge filter is conceptually a valley valve; the same boundary-engineering principle might also yield nonreciprocal normal-state transport in the same geometry.
  • Since the diode effect relies on ballistic phase-coherent edge channels, its robustness at finite temperature or in diffusive samples is not addressed; one could test whether eta degrades as edge scattering is introduced.
  • The mechanism suggests a design rule for field-free superconducting diodes in other magnetic topological materials: pattern the two transverse edges with different sublattice terminations to maximize edge inequivalence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a boundary-controlled mechanism for nonreciprocal superconducting transport in chiral kagome antiferromagnets. The authors show that an out-of-plane spin canting opens a Chern-number C=2 bulk gap, producing chiral edge modes whose low-energy valley character and dispersion depend on sublattice termination at the two edges. When the upper and lower edges terminate asymmetrically (12/21-type), the edge spectra become inequivalent, E_upper(kx) ≠ E_lower(-kx), even though the bulk is inversion-symmetric and symmetric in kx. This boundary-induced edge inequivalence is then shown, via Green's-function calculations, to produce a phase-asymmetric Andreev spectrum, a Josephson diode effect with efficiency η ≈ -20.6% for the chosen parameters, and anomalous direction-dependent Fraunhofer patterns. The central claim is that transverse boundary asymmetry alone, without bulk electronic asymmetry, is sufficient for a Josephson diode effect.

Significance. If established, the mechanism would broaden the microscopic routes to the Josephson diode effect beyond bulk asymmetric band-structure mechanisms, and it identifies a concrete, experimentally accessible platform (Mn3Sn, Mn3Ge and related chiral kagome antiferromagnets). The main-text calculations are internally consistent and explore parameter dependencies (Mz, J, Ny). The proposed signatures — asymmetric Andreev spectra, nonreciprocal critical currents, and anomalous Fraunhofer patterns — are falsifiable and could motivate edge-engineering experiments. However, the paper's core assumption, that boundary termination acts as a robust valley-selective filter, is not demonstrated quantitatively, and the transport results rely entirely on an unavailable Supplemental Material. The significance is therefore conditional on resolving these load-bearing gaps.

major comments (4)
  1. [Asymmetric and valley-dependent chiral edge states] The valley-selective filter claim — "A/B- and C-terminated edges favor opposite valleys" — is the microscopic basis for the entire diode effect, but it is presented only as a qualitative argument. No valley-resolved spectral weight calculation or analytic sublattice-valley projection is shown in the main text. Moreover, the next paragraph states that "the low-energy edge modes at both boundaries are selected near the same valley while propagating in opposite directions," which appears to contradict the opposite-valley statement. This ambiguity is load-bearing because if the valleys are not cleanly selected, or if edge roughness/disorder mixes K and K' at a given edge, the asymmetry between the two edges is suppressed and the diode effect would be reduced or vanish. The Discussion asserts robustness to "imperfect or engineered edges" but defers to the SM. Please provide a quantitative dem
  2. [Asymmetric Andreev spectrum / Nonreciprocal supercurrents] All quantitative transport results — the Andreev spectra in Fig. 3, the CPR in Fig. 4(a), the diode efficiency η, and the Fraunhofer pattern in Fig. 4(d) — are obtained from a Green's function technique described only in the SM [69]. Since the SM is not available, the reader cannot verify the implementation of the superconducting leads, the phase bias, the current formula, or whether any self-consistency for Δ is assumed. This is particularly important because the central claim is a nonreciprocal CPR, and a small numerical error in the Green's-function formalism could produce spurious asymmetry. Please include the essential Green's-function equations (or a supplementary preprint) and state whether the superconducting pairing is treated as an externally imposed order parameter.
  3. [Nonreciprocal supercurrents, Fig. 4] The main junction calculations use Nx = Ny = 10. With Δ = 0.03t, the superconducting coherence length is likely comparable to or larger than the 10-unit-cell spacer; the junction may be in the short-junction limit with substantial finite-size effects. Fig. 4(c) shows dependence on Ny, but Nx is fixed. The convergence of the diode efficiency and CPR with respect to both Nx and Ny is not established. Please provide a finite-size scaling study (e.g., η versus Nx and Ny for larger sizes) to confirm that the nonreciprocal effect is not an artifact of the tiny system.
  4. [Nonreciprocal supercurrents, symmetry relation] The relation Is(Mz, φ) = −Is(−Mz, −φ) is stated and used to derive η(Mz) = −η(−Mz), but the proof is deferred to the SM [69]. Since this is a symmetry statement about the model, it should be derivable in the main text from the Hamiltonian's symmetries (e.g., combined time reversal and spin rotation). Please provide the symmetry argument explicitly; this is not a request for numerical detail but for a clear analytical justification of a property that is central to the diode-polarity discussion.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Chern gap with C=2] Typo: "band strcture" should be "band structure".
  2. [Introduction] Grammar issue: "which have attracted major interest because of their rich topological and transport properties exhibit" — remove "exhibit" or restructure.
  3. [References] Refs. [35] and [73] are duplicates (Y. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. X 12, 041013 (2022)). Please consolidate.
  4. [Fig. 2 caption] The definitions of 11-, 22-, 12-, and 21-type terminations would be clearer if the caption explicitly stated which sublattices are exposed at the upper and lower edges for each type (e.g., 11: C on both edges; 12: A/B on upper, C on lower; etc.).
  5. [Nonreciprocal supercurrents] The notation I_c^+ and |I_c^-| is used without defining the forward/backward convention. Please define clearly, e.g., I_c^+ = max_φ I(φ), I_c^- = min_φ I(φ).
  6. [Discussion] The sentence "similar behavior is expected for more general asymmetric or irregular boundaries" is speculative and not backed by calculation; consider softening to "may be expected" or cite a SM calculation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the diode effect and nonreciprocal transport are computed outputs from an independently specified model, not fitted targets or imported self-cited results.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The model Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) is fixed with parameters (t, J, Mz, μ, Δ) before any transport quantity is computed. The Chern gap with C=2 follows from the standard Berry-curvature formula (Eq. 3) after adding the canting term (Eq. 2), and the edge spectra are obtained by explicit ribbon diagonalization for each boundary termination (Fig. 2). The nonreciprocal Andreev spectra, CPRs, diode efficiencies, and Fraunhofer patterns are outputs of the Green-function calculation described in the SM, not quantities used to fit any model parameter. The valley-selective boundary-termination claim is derived from the sublattice structure of the kagome wavefunctions and the numerical edge spectra, not assumed as an input. The relation E_upper(kx) ≠ E_lower(-kx) for asymmetric terminations is a calculated result, and the diode asymmetry I_c^+ ≠ |I_c^-| follows from that calculated edge inequivalence. Self-citations (Refs. [48], [67], [68]) appear only in background or symmetry statements and are accompanied by independent references ([52], [71], [72]); no load-bearing conclusion rests solely on a self-citation, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. The Discussion's expectation that irregular boundaries behave similarly is an extrapolation rather than a circular reduction. Therefore no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's quantitative predictions rest on four hand-chosen model parameters (J, Mz, mu, Delta) and several clean-limit assumptions. There are no new particles or entities. The 'valley-selective filter' is a proposed emergent property, not an independent benchmark.

free parameters (5)
  • Exchange coupling J = 0.4t (main text)
    Sets the scale of the magnetic exchange relative to hopping; chosen by hand to open the Chern gap and place the Fermi level inside it. Controls the magnitude of the diode effect; inset in Fig. 4(b) shows the diode vanishes at J=0.
  • Out-of-plane spin canting Mz = 0.1t (main text); 0.2t in Figs. 1-2
    Breaks T·Mz and opens the Chern gap with C=2. The diode efficiency is computed as a function of Mz; the value is an input, not fitted to data.
  • Chemical potential mu = -0.1t
    Chosen inside the bulk gap so transport is edge-dominated. The effect is expected to persist when bulk states contribute, but the specific value is a model choice.
  • Pairing amplitude Delta = 0.03t
    Proximity-induced superconducting pairing in the leads; chosen small compared to the gap to remain in the Andreev limit.
  • Ribbon dimensions Nx, Ny = Nx=10, Ny=10 (Ny up to 60 for Fraunhofer)
    Finite-size parameters; edge-state hybridization at small Ny modulates eta but saturates at large Ny, so the central claim is not fitted to a specific size.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Hamiltonian (1) with coplanar 120-degree spin texture and spin-canting term (2) captures the low-energy physics of chiral kagome antiferromagnets such as Mn3Sn/Mn3Ge.
    Model is taken from Ref [52]; no first-principles justification for the canted phase in real materials is given.
  • standard math The spin-canting term breaks T·Mz, allowing a finite Berry curvature and a Chern number C=±2 at 1/3 filling.
    Band topology result; the paper computes Chern numbers directly, so this is standard math applied to the model.
  • standard math Bulk-boundary correspondence holds: a C=2 gap supports two co-propagating chiral edge modes.
    Standard topological principle; used to interpret the ribbon spectra.
  • ad hoc to paper Edge termination acts as a valley-selective filter: A/B- and C-terminated edges favor opposite valleys.
    This is the paper's explanatory mechanism, asserted from sublattice structure and demonstrated in the ribbon spectra; not independently derived for arbitrary edges.
  • domain assumption The SNS junction is ballistic and phase-coherent, with no disorder, edge reconstruction, or inelastic scattering; the superconductor leads are conventional s-wave with equal coupling to both edges.
    Clean-limit assumption; the paper does not analyze disorder or interface imperfections.
  • standard math The Green's-function scattering calculation (SM) correctly yields Andreev spectra and supercurrents for the short Nx=10 junction.
    Standard method, but not verifiable from main text; SM not included.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonreciprocal Superconducting Transport from Chiral Edge States." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FAZUSTJS

@misc{pith2026260718159,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonreciprocal Superconducting Transport from Chiral Edge States},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FAZUSTJS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18159}
}
read the original abstract

Nonreciprocal superconducting transport enables dissipationless rectification and has attracted considerable interest, yet its microscopic origin is typically sought in bulk electronic states. Here, we show that boundary-controlled chiral edge states in topological systems provide a simple yet largely overlooked mechanism for nonreciprocal superconducting transport. Focusing on chiral kagome antiferromagnets, we demonstrate that out-of-plane spin canting or spin-orbit coupling opens a high-Chern-number bulk gap, giving rise to multiple chiral edge modes. Strikingly, sublattice-dependent boundary termination selects a single-valley character for the edge states, leading to asymmetric edge spectra at opposite edges. This boundary asymmetry directly yields observable nonreciprocal signatures in Josephson junctions oriented transverse to the edges, including asymmetric Andreev spectra, Josephson diode effect, and anomalous Fraunhofer interference patterns. These findings broaden the microscopic understanding of superconducting nonreciprocity and highlight boundary engineering as a tunable route toward superconducting diode devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18159 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the chiral kagome antiferromagnet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Left: Schematic of a chiral kagome antiferromagnet ribbon with 11-type boundary termination in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Andreev spectrum of an SNS junction with a chiral [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) CPR of the SNS junction for different transverse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [48]

    J.-X. Hou, C. Li, L.-H. Hu, and S.-B. Zhang, Field-free Josephson diode and tunableϕ0-junction in chiral kagome antiferromagnets, arXiv preprint , arXiv:2512.16260 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  2. [69]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL] for additional details on the supercurrent calculations, the calculation of the Fraunhofer pattern, the effects of spin canting and bound- ary reversal, and the generic nature of boundary-induced asymmetric topological edge states

  3. [1]

    G. L. J. A. Rikken, J. Fölling, and P. Wyder, Electrical Magnetochiral Anisotropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 236602 (2001)

    2001

  4. [2]

    G. L. J. A. Rikken and P. Wyder, Magnetoelectric Anisotropy in Diffusive Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 016601 (2005)

    2005

  5. [3]

    Ideue, K

    T. Ideue, K. Hamamoto, S. Koshikawa, M. Ezawa, S. Shimizu, Y. Kaneko, Y. Tokura, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Iwasa, Bulk rectification effect in a polar semiconduc- tor, Nat. Phys.13, 578 (2017)

    2017

  6. [4]

    Tokura and N

    Y. Tokura and N. Nagaosa, Nonreciprocal responses from non-centrosymmetric quantum materials, Nat. Commun. 9, 3740 (2018)

    2018

  7. [5]

    F. Qin, W. Shi, T. Ideue, M. Yoshida, A. Zak, R. Tenne, T. Kikitsu, D. Inoue, D. Hashizume, and Y. Iwasa, Su- perconductivity in a chiral nanotube, Nat. Commun.8, 14465 (2017)

    2017

  8. [6]

    Hoshino, R

    S. Hoshino, R. Wakatsuki, K. Hamamoto, and N. Na- gaosa, Nonreciprocal charge transport in two-dimensional noncentrosymmetric superconductors, Phys. Rev. B98, 054510 (2018)

    2018

Show all 85 references
  1. [7]

    F. Ando, Y. Miyasaka, T. Li, J. Ishizuka, T. Arakawa, Y. Shiota, T. Moriyama, Y. Yanase, and T. Ono, Obser- vation of superconducting diode effect, Nature584, 373 (2020)

    2020

  2. [8]

    Y.-Y. Lyu, J. Jiang, Y.-L. Wang, Z.-L. Xiao, S. Dong, Q.- H. Chen, M. V. Milošević, H. Wang, R. Divan, J. E. Pear- son,et al., Superconducting diode effect via conformal- mapped nanoholes, Nat. Commun.12, 2703 (2021)

    2021

  3. [9]

    J. J. He, Y. Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, A phenomenological theory of superconductor diodes, New J. Phys.24, 053014 (2022)

    2022

  4. [10]

    N. F. Yuan and L. Fu, Supercurrent diode effect and finite-momentum superconductors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119, e2119548119 (2022)

    2022

  5. [11]

    Daido, Y

    A. Daido, Y. Ikeda, and Y. Yanase, Intrinsic supercon- ducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 037001 (2022)

    2022

  6. [12]

    J.-X. Lin, P. Siriviboon, H. D. Scammell, S. Liu, D. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, M. S. Scheurer, and J. Li, Zero-field superconducting diode ef- fect in small-twist-angle trilayer graphene, Nat. Phys.18, 1221 (2022)

    2022

  7. [13]

    Ilić and F

    S. Ilić and F. S. Bergeret, Theory of the supercurrent diode effect in Rashba superconductors with arbitrary disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 177001 (2022)

    2022

  8. [14]

    Bauriedl, C

    L. Bauriedl, C. Bäuml, L. Fuchs, C. Baumgartner, N. Paulik, J. M. Bauer, K.-Q. Lin, J. M. Lupton, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe,et al., Supercurrent diode effect and magnetochiral anisotropy in few-layer NbSe2, Nat. Commun.13, 4266 (2022)

    2022

  9. [15]

    Y. Hou, F. Nichele, H. Chi, A. Lodesani, Y. Wu, M. F. Ritter, D. Z. Haxell, M. Davydova, S. Ilić, O. Glezakou- Elbert, A. Varambally, F. S. Bergeret, A. Kamra, L. Fu, P. A. Lee, and J. S. Moodera, Ubiquitous superconducting 6 diode effect in superconductor thin films, Phys. Re...

    2023

  10. [16]

    Nadeem, M

    M. Nadeem, M. S. Fuhrer, and X. Wang, The supercon- ducting diode effect, Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 558 (2023)

    2023

  11. [17]

    J. J. He, Y. Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, The supercurrent diode effect and nonreciprocal paraconductivity due to the chiral structure of nanotubes, Nat. Commun.14, 3330 (2023)

    2023

  12. [18]

    T. Le, Z. Pan, Z. Xu, J. Liu, J. Wang, Z. Lou, X. Yang, Z. Wang, Y. Yao, C. Wu,et al., Superconducting diode ef- fect and interference patterns in kagome CsV3Sb5, Nature 630, 64 (2024)

    2024

  13. [19]

    Banerjee and M

    S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Altermagnetic supercon- ducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. B110, 024503 (2024)

    2024

  14. [20]

    Chakraborty and A

    D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Perfect super- conducting diode effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 026001 (2025)

    2025

  15. [21]

    Wang and N

    R. Wang and N. Hao, Universal diagnostic criterion for intrinsic superconducting diode effect, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2507.04876 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Fracassi, S

    S. Fracassi, S. Traverso, S. Heun, M. Sassetti, M. Carrega, and N. T. Ziani, Intrinsic and tunable superconducting diode effect in quantum spin Hall systems, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2512.02575 (2025)

    2025

  17. [23]

    Bhowmik, D

    S. Bhowmik, D. Samanta, A. K. Nandy, A. Saha, and S. K. Ghosh, Optimizing one dimensional superconduct- ing diodes: interplay of Rashba spin-orbit coupling and magnetic fields, Commun. Phys.8, 260 (2025)

    2025

  18. [24]

    A. Pal, D. Mondal, T. Nag, and A. Saha, Topological superconductivity and superconducting diode effect me- diated via unconventional magnet and ising spin-orbit coupling, arXiv preprint , arXiv:2512.01266 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Bhowmik and A

    S. Bhowmik and A. Saha, Topological majorana zero modes and the superconducting diode effect driven by fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov pairing in a helical Shiba chain, Phys. Rev. B111, L161402 (2025)

    2025

  20. [26]

    J. Li, Z. Zhang, S. Wang, Y. He, H. Lyu, Q. Wang, B. Dong, D. Zhu, H. Matsuki, D. Zhu,et al., Field-free superconducting diode enabled by geometric asymmetry and perpendicular magnetization, Adv. Mater.38, e11414 (2026)

    2026

  21. [27]

    Wakatsuki, Y

    R. Wakatsuki, Y. Saito, S. Hoshino, Y. M. Itahashi, T. Ideue, M. Ezawa, Y. Iwasa, and N. Nagaosa, Non- reciprocal charge transport in noncentrosymmetric super- conductors, Sci. Adv.3, e1602390 (2017)

    2017

  22. [28]

    H. Wu, Y. Wang, Y. Xu, P. K. Sivakumar, C. Pasco, U. Filippozzi, S. S. Parkin, Y.-J. Zeng, T. McQueen, and M. N. Ali, The field-free Josephson diode in a van der Waals heterostructure, Nature604, 653 (2022)

    2022

  23. [29]

    Baumgartner, L

    C. Baumgartner, L. Fuchs, A. Costa, S. Reinhardt, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lindemann, M. J. Manfra, P. E. Faria Junior, D. Kochan,et al., Supercurrent rectifi- cation and magnetochiral effects in symmetric Josephson junctions, Nat. Nanotechnol.17, 39 (2022)

    2022

  24. [30]

    B. Pal, A. Chakraborty, P. K. Sivakumar, M. Davydova, A. K. Gopi, A. K. Pandeya, J. A. Krieger, Y. Zhang, M. Date, S. Ju,et al., Josephson diode effect from Cooper pair momentum in a topological semimetal, Nat. Phys. 18, 1228 (2022)

    2022

  25. [31]

    J. Hu, C. Wu, and X. Dai, Proposed design of a Josephson diode, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 067004 (2007)

    2007

  26. [32]

    C.-Z. Chen, J. J. He, M. N. Ali, G.-H. Lee, K. C. Fong, and K. T. Law, Asymmetric Josephson effect in inversion symmetry breaking topological materials, Phys. Rev. B 98, 075430 (2018)

    2018

  27. [33]

    Misaki and N

    K. Misaki and N. Nagaosa, Theory of the nonreciprocal Josephson effect, Phys. Rev. B103, 245302 (2021)

    2021

  28. [34]

    Davydova, S

    M. Davydova, S. Prembabu, and L. Fu, Universal Joseph- son diode effect, Sci. Adv.8, eabo0309 (2022)

    2022

  29. [36]

    Tanaka, B

    Y. Tanaka, B. Lu, and N. Nagaosa, Theory of giant diode effect ind-wave superconductor junctions on the surface of a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B106, 214524 (2022)

    2022

  30. [37]

    Diez-Merida, A

    J. Diez-Merida, A. Díez-Carlón, S. Yang, Y.-M. Xie, X.-J. Gao, J. Senior, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, X. Lu, A. P. Higginbotham,et al., Symmetry-broken Josephson junc- tions and superconducting diodes in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nat. Commun.14, 2396 (2023)

    2023

  31. [38]

    Hu, Z.-T

    J.-X. Hu, Z.-T. Sun, Y.-M. Xie, and K. T. Law, Josephson diode effect induced by valley polarization in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 266003 (2023)

    2023

  32. [39]

    J. F. Steiner, L. Melischek, M. Trahms, K. J. Franke, and F. von Oppen, Diode effects in current-biased Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 177002 (2023)

    2023

  33. [40]

    Sundaresh, J

    A. Sundaresh, J. I. Väyrynen, Y. Lyanda-Geller, and L. P. Rokhinson, Diamagnetic mechanism of critical cur- rent non-reciprocity in multilayered superconductors, Nat. Commun.14, 1628 (2023)

    2023

  34. [41]

    Cheng, Y

    Q. Cheng, Y. Mao, and Q.-F. Sun, Field-free Josephson diode effect in altermagnet/normal metal/altermagnet junctions, Phys. Rev. B110, 014518 (2024)

    2024

  35. [42]

    S. Ilić, P. Virtanen, D. Crawford, T. T. Heikkilä, and F. S. Bergeret, Superconducting diode effect in diffusive superconductors and Josephson junctions with Rashba spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B110, L140501 (2024)

    2024

  36. [43]

    Jiang and J

    K. Jiang and J. Hu, Superconducting diode effects, Nat. Phys.18, 1145 (2022)

    2022

  37. [44]

    Wang, Q.-H

    D. Wang, Q.-H. Wang, and C. Wu, Current-reversion symmetry breaking and the dc Josephson diode effect, Sci. Bull.70, 4181 (2025)

    2025

  38. [45]

    J. Ma, H. Wang, W. Zhuo, B. Lei, S. Wang, W. Wang, X.-Y. Chen, Z.-Y. Wang, B. Ge, Z. Wang,et al., Field-free Josephson diode effect in NbSe2 van der Waals junction, Commun. Phys.8, 125 (2025)

    2025

  39. [46]

    C. Sun, J. B. Tjernshaugen, and J. Linder, Voltage- tunable spin supercurrent nonreciprocity reaching 100% efficiency, Phys. Rev. B112, 064504 (2025)

    2025

  40. [47]

    Y. Sun, Z. Zhang, and J. J. He, Strong correlation drives zero-field Josephson diode effect (2026)

    2026

  41. [49]

    Lahiri, M

    A. Lahiri, M. Polák, and B. Trauzettel, Diode effect in microwave-irradiated Josephson junctions with Yu-Shiba- Rusinov states, Phys. Rev. B113, 224502 (2026)

    2026

  42. [50]

    Moessner, Magnets with strong geometric frustration, Can

    R. Moessner, Magnets with strong geometric frustration, Can. J. Phys.79, 1283 (2001)

    2001

  43. [51]

    Matan, D

    K. Matan, D. Grohol, D. G. Nocera, T. Yildirim, A. B. Harris, S.-H. Lee, S. E. Nagler, and Y. S. Lee, Spin waves in the frustrated kagome lattice antiferromagnet KFe3(OH)6(SO4)2, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 247201 (2006)

    2006

  44. [52]

    H. Chen, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Anomalous Hall effect arising from noncollinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 017205 (2014)

    2014

  45. [53]

    Kübler and C

    J. Kübler and C. Felser, Non-collinear antiferromagnets 7 and the anomalous Hall effect, Europhys. Lett.108, 67001 (2014)

    2014

  46. [54]

    Nakatsuji, N

    S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara, and T. Higo, Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature, Nature527, 212 (2015)

    2015

  47. [55]

    A. K. Nayak, J. E. Fischer, Y. Sun, B. Yan, J. Karel, A. C. Komarek, C. Shekhar, N. Kumar, W. Schnelle, J. Kübler, C. Felser, and S. S. P. Parkin, Large anoma- lous Hall effect driven by a nonvanishing berry curvature in the noncolinear antiferromagnet Mn3Ge, Sci. Adv.2, e1501...

    2016

  48. [56]

    Kuroda, T

    K. Kuroda, T. Tomita, M.-T. Suzuki, C. Bareille, A. A. Nugroho, P. Goswami, M. Ochi, M. Ikhlas, M. Nakayama, S. Akebi, R. Noguchi, R. Ishii, N. Inami, K. Ono, H. Kumi- gashira, A. Varykhalov, T. Muro, T. Koretsune, R. Arita, S. Shin, T. Kondo, and S. Nakatsuji, Evidence for ma...

    2017

  49. [57]

    Železný, Y

    J. Železný, Y. Zhang, C. Felser, and B. Yan, Spin- polarized current in noncollinear antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 187204 (2017)

    2017

  50. [58]

    Ikhlas, T

    M. Ikhlas, T. Tomita, T. Koretsune, M.-T. Suzuki, D. Nishio-Hamane, R. Arita, Y. Otani, and S. Nakat- suji, Large anomalous nernst effect at room temperature in a chiral antiferromagnet, Nat. Phys.13, 1085 (2017)

    2017

  51. [59]

    T. Higo, H. Man, D. B. Gopman, L. Wu, T. Koretsune, O. M. J. van ’t Erve, Y. P. Kabanov, D. Rees, Y. Li, M.-T. Suzuki, S. Patankar, M. Ikhlas, C. L. Chien, R. Arita, R.D.Shull, J.Orenstein,andS.Nakatsuji,Largemagneto- optical Kerr effect and imaging of magnetic octupole domain...

    2018

  52. [60]

    H. Tsai, T. Higo, K. Kondou, T. Nomoto, A. Sakai, A. Kobayashi, T. Nakano, K. Yakushiji, R. Arita, S. Miwa, et al., Electrical manipulation of a topological antiferro- magnetic state, Nature580, 608 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    T. Higo, K. Kondou, T. Nomoto, M. Shiga, S. Sakamoto, X. Chen, D. Nishio-Hamane, R. Arita, Y. Otani, S. Miwa, et al., Perpendicular full switching of chiral antiferromag- netic order by current, Nature607, 474 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    Z. Zhou, Y. Cao, Z. Pan, Y. Zhang, S. Liang, F. Pan, and C. Song, Field-free full switching of chiral antiferromag- netic order, Nature651, 341–347 (2026)

    2026

  55. [63]

    R. S. Souto, M. Leijnse, and C. Schrade, Josephson diode effect in supercurrent interferometers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 267702 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    Y. Li, D. Yan, Y. Hong, H. Sheng, A. Wang, Z. Dou, X. Guo, X. Shi, Z. Su, Z. Lyu,et al., Interfering Josephson diode effect in Ta2Pd3Te5 asymmetric edge interferometer, Nat. Commun.15, 9031 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    Huang, T

    H. Huang, T. de Picoli, and J. I. Väyrynen, Superconduct- ing diode effect in two-dimensional topological insulator edges and Josephson junctions, Appl. Phys. Lett.125, 032602 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    Guo, X.-H

    G.-L. Guo, X.-H. Pan, H. Dong, and X. Liu, Edge de- pendent Josephson diode effect in WTe2-based Josephson junction, arXiv preprint , arXiv:2508.21357 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Zhang and L.-H

    S.-B. Zhang and L.-H. Hu, Finite-momentum mixed singlet-triplet pairing in chiral antiferromagnets induced by even-parity spin texture, Phys. Rev. B112, L100501 (2025)

    2025

  60. [68]

    Zhang, L.-H

    S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, Q. Niu, and Z. Zhang, Spin-valley locking and pure spin-triplet superconductivity in non- collinear antiferromagnets proximitized to conventional superconductors, Newton2, 100379 (2026)

    2026

  61. [70]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized Hall conductance in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  62. [71]

    Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect, Phys

    Y. Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 3697 (1993)

    1993

  63. [72]

    Shen,Topological insulators, Vol

    S.-Q. Shen,Topological insulators, Vol. 174 (Springer, 2012)

    2012

  64. [73]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Gu, P. Li, J. Hu, and K. Jiang, General theory of Josephson diodes, Phys. Rev. X12, 041013 (2022)

    2022

  65. [74]

    Takeuchi, Y

    Y. Takeuchi, Y. Yamane, J.-Y. Yoon, R. Itoh, B. Jinnai, S. Kanai, J. Ieda, S. Fukami, and H. Ohno, Chiral-spin rotation of non-collinear antiferromagnet by spin-orbit torque, Nat. Mater.20, 1364 (2021)

    2021

  66. [75]

    H. Xie, X. Chen, Q. Zhang, Z. Mu, X. Zhang, B. Yan, and Y. Wu, Magnetization switching in polycrystalline Mn3Sn thin film induced by self-generated spin-polarized current, Nat. Commun.13, 5744 (2022)

    2022

  67. [76]

    B. Pal, B. K. Hazra, B. Göbel, J.-C. Jeon, A. K. Pandeya, A. Chakraborty, O. Busch, A. K. Srivastava, H. Deniz, J. M. Taylor,et al., Setting of the magnetic structure of chiral kagome antiferromagnets by a seeded spin-orbit torque, Sci. Adv.8, eabo5930 (2022)

    2022

  68. [77]

    Zheng, T

    Z. Zheng, T. Zeng, T. Zhao, S. Shi, L. Ren, T. Zhang, L. Jia, Y. Gu, R. Xiao, H. Zhou,et al., Effective electrical manipulation of a topological antiferromagnet by orbital torques, Nat. Commun.15, 745 (2024)

    2024

  69. [78]

    Zheng, L

    Z. Zheng, L. Jia, Z. Zhang, Q. Shen, G. Zhou, Z. Cui, L. Ren, Z. Chen, N. F. Jamaludin, T. Zhao,et al., All- electrical perpendicular switching of chiral antiferromag- netic order, Nat. Mater.24, 1407 (2025)

    2025

  70. [79]

    Z. Xu, Y. Zhou, X. Zhang, Y. Qiao, Z. Xu, D. Shao, and Z. Zhu, Spin-orbit torque-driven chiral domain wall motion in Mn3Sn, Appl. Phys. Lett.127, 7 (2025)

    2025

  71. [80]

    K.-R. Jeon, B. K. Hazra, K. Cho, A. Chakraborty, J.-C. Jeon, H. Han, H. L. Meyerheim, T. Kontos, and S. S. Parkin, Long-range supercurrents through a chiral non- collinear antiferromagnet in lateral Josephson junctions, Nat. Mater.20, 1358 (2021)

    2021

  72. [81]

    K.-R. Jeon, B. K. Hazra, J.-K. Kim, J.-C. Jeon, H. Han, H. L. Meyerheim, T. Kontos, A. Cottet, and S. S. Parkin, Chiral antiferromagnetic Josephson junctions as spin- triplet supercurrent spin valves and dc SQUIDs, Nat. Nanotechnol.18, 747 (2023)

    2023

  73. [82]

    X. Jia, M. Hofmann, V. Meunier, B. G. Sumpter, J. Campos-Delgado, J. M. Romo-Herrera, H. Son, Y.-P. Hsieh, A. Reina, J. Kong,et al., Controlled formation of sharp zigzag and armchair edges in graphitic nanoribbons, Science323, 1701 (2009)

    2009

  74. [83]

    M. G. Stanford, P. D. Rack, and D. Jariwala, Emerging nanofabrication and quantum confinement techniques for 2D materials beyond graphene, npj 2D Mater. Appl.2, 1 (2018)

    2018

  75. [84]

    Duan, J.-Y

    S. Duan, J.-Y. You, J. Gou, J. Chen, Y. L. Huang, M. Liu, S. Sun, Y. Wang, X. Yu, L. Wang,et al., Epitaxial growth of single-layer kagome nanoflakes with topological band inversion, ACS nano16, 21079 (2022). 8

    2022

  76. [85]

    Mazzola, S

    F. Mazzola, S. Enzner, P. Eck, C. Bigi, M. Jugovac, I. Co- jocariu, V. Feyer, Z. Shu, G. M. Pierantozzi, A. De Vita, et al., Observation of termination-dependent topological connectivity in a magnetic Weyl kagome lattice, Nano Lett.23, 8035 (2023)

    2023

  77. [86]

    Z. Wei, Y. Qiao, Y.-Y. Lyu, D. Wang, T. Li, L. R. Cadorim, P. Zhang, W.-C. Yue, D. Li, Z. Song,et al., Scal- able high-temperature superconducting diodes enabled by intrinsic Josephson junctions, Natl. Sci. Rev. , nwag285 (2026)

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.