REVIEW 1 cited by
SubER: A Metric for Automatic Evaluation of Subtitle Quality
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper addresses the problem of evaluating the quality of automatically generated subtitles, which includes not only the quality of the machine-transcribed or translated speech, but also the quality of line segmentation and subtitle timing. We propose SubER - a single novel metric based on edit distance with shifts that takes all of these subtitle properties into account. We compare it to existing metrics for evaluating transcription, translation, and subtitle quality. A careful human evaluation in a post-editing scenario shows that the new metric has a high correlation with the post-editing effort and direct human assessment scores, outperforming baseline metrics considering only the subtitle text, such as WER and BLEU, and existing methods to integrate segmentation and timing features.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Optimizing Estonian TV Subtitles with Semi-supervised Learning and LLMs
Fine-tuning Whisper on Estonian subtitles with iterative pseudo-labeling and test-time LLM editing improves subtitle quality, while LLM editing during training yields no gain.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.