Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SubER: A Metric for Automatic Evaluation of Subtitle Quality

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.05805 v1 pith:FB3HEYYJ submitted 2022-05-11 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords qualitysubtitlemetricevaluatingevaluationexistinghumanmetrics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper addresses the problem of evaluating the quality of automatically generated subtitles, which includes not only the quality of the machine-transcribed or translated speech, but also the quality of line segmentation and subtitle timing. We propose SubER - a single novel metric based on edit distance with shifts that takes all of these subtitle properties into account. We compare it to existing metrics for evaluating transcription, translation, and subtitle quality. A careful human evaluation in a post-editing scenario shows that the new metric has a high correlation with the post-editing effort and direct human assessment scores, outperforming baseline metrics considering only the subtitle text, such as WER and BLEU, and existing methods to integrate segmentation and timing features.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimizing Estonian TV Subtitles with Semi-supervised Learning and LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning Whisper on Estonian subtitles with iterative pseudo-labeling and test-time LLM editing improves subtitle quality, while LLM editing during training yields no gain.

Pith tools