Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Gamma-ray bursts with continuous energy injection and their afterglow signature

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0108402 v2 pith:FB4IAQ57 submitted 2001-08-24 astro-ph

classification astro-ph
keywords injectionenergyafterglowfireballlightcurvessignatureadditionalbump
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

(Abridged) We discuss a Gamma-ray burst (GRB) fireball with an additional energy injection, either in the form of a Poynting-flux-dominated outflow or a kinetic-energy-dominated matter shell injected after the burst. A total injection energy comparable to that of the impulsive energy in the initial fireball is required to make a detectable signature in the afterglow lightcurves. For the case of a Poynting-flux-dominated injection, this leads to a gradual achromatic bump feature. For the case when the injection is kinetic-energy-dominated, the collision between the rear (injected) and the forward shell mild if the relative velocity between the colliding shells does not exceed a critical value defined by their energy ratio. Otherwise, the injection is violent, and an additional pair of shocks will form at the discontinuity between two colliding shells, so that there are altogether three shock-heated regions from which the emission contributes to the final lightcurves. We describe the shell-merging process in detail and present broadband lightcurves with the injection signatures. A violent collision results in very complicated features, which differs from the gradual bump signature found in the Poynting-flux or mild matter injection cases. In all the cases, the energetics of the fireball as well as the absolute afterglow flux level after the injection are boosted after the injection. Identifying the different injection signatures from future early afterglow observations may provide diagnostics about the nature of the fireball and of the central engine.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. EuraGovExam: A Multilingual Multimodal Benchmark from Real-World Civil Service Exams

    cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    EuraGovExam is a real-exam, image-only multilingual multimodal benchmark on which state-of-the-art VLMs reach only ~86% accuracy.

  2. Earliest simultaneous multi-color optical observations of GRB 230328B: from 41 seconds to the host-galaxy identification

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    New early multi-wavelength data on GRB 230328B shows afterglow with early bump and late achromatic rebrightening at ~4000 s, modeled via MCMC as forward shock plus late energy injection in a dusty S0 host with AV~0.8 ...

Pith tools