Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 38 references

An introduction to $(G,c)$-bands

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The pullback of a discrete difference Miura transform built from (G,c)-bands equals the q-character homomorphism for simply-laced quantum affine algebras, for every Coxeter element c.

desk verdict The discrete Miura map and the cross-section theorem are real contributions, but Theorem 30's proof is thinner than advertised—it leans on deferred cluster results and an imported substitution rule. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.19066 v2 pith:FBENNNET submitted 2025-08-26 math.RT math.QAmath.RA

Luca Francone , Bernard Leclerc This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.RTmath.QAmath.RA MSC 17B3713F60
keywords (Gc)-bandsq-charactersquantumaffinealgebrasclusterdifferenceMiuratransformationDrinfeld-SokolovreductionSteinbergcross-sectionKirillov-Reshetikhinmodules
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Starting from a simple algebraic group G of type A, D, or E and a Coxeter element c, this paper studies the infinite-dimensional scheme B(G,c) whose points are (G,c)-bands: sequences of group elements whose successive ratios lie in the classical cross-section A. The main result is that a natural discrete analogue H of the difference Miura transformation has pullback H* equal, under explicit isomorphisms, to the q-character homomorphism on the Grothendieck ring of the category C_Z of finite-dimensional modules over the quantum affine algebra. This verifies, in all simply-laced affine types and for every Coxeter element, the 1990s conjecture that q-characters can be obtained through a q-difference Drinfeld-Sokolov reduction. The route to the theorem goes through cluster structures on invariant subalgebras of the band coordinate ring, generalized Baxter's relations, and a new discrete cross-section theorem for the discrete gauge action. A reader should care because it turns a quantum-analytic invariant into a piece of classical algebraic geometry and makes q-characters computable as cluster expansions.

What carries the argument

A (G,c)-band is a doubly infinite sequence (g(s))_{s∈Z} of elements of G such that g(s)g(s+1)^{-1} lies in the affine cross-section A = U(c^{-1})c introduced in [37]; band points form the affine scheme B(G,c). The discrete difference Miura transformation H: (L_{c,e})^Z → A^Z sends a sequence of elements of the reduced double Bruhat cell to the uniquely conjugate sequence in A^Z under the discrete gauge action of U^Z. The coordinate rings R(G,c)^G, R(G,c)^U, R(G,c)^{U^-}, and R(G,c) carry cluster structures whose initial seeds are labelled by generalized minors; mutation at special vertices reproduces T-system and QQ-system relations. The map H is the discrete counterpart of the loop-group Mi

What would settle it

Take a non-fundamental simple module M in C_Z for type D4 or E6, compute the Laurent polynomial obtained from the cluster expansion of its image in R(G,c)^U under Proposition 26, apply substitution (8), and compare term-by-term with χ_q(M) computed by the standard recursive algorithm; a single coefficient mismatch refutes the equality H* = χ_q.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 30 is the paper's central claim. Under natural isomorphisms identifying C[A^Z] with C ⊗ K0(C_Z) and C[(L_{c,e})^Z] with a Laurent polynomial ring in the variables Y_{i,q^{2s+1−ξ_i}}, the pullback H* of the discrete analogue H of the difference Miura transformation coincides with the q-character homomorphism χ_q. The identification is assembled from three inputs: the cluster expansion of the image of a module class in R(G,c)^U (or R(G,c)^{U^-}), the generalized Baxter's relations of [9], and the cluster-structure theorems of [8]. In particular, the q-character of every finite-dimensional module in C_Z is a cluster expansion with respect to the distinguished cluster, and the equality H

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the comparison in Section 6.1 is exact — the cluster expansion of a band-side module class after substitution (8), taken from the generalized Baxter relations and the deferred cluster-structure theorems, literally equals the q-character — and this matching is quoted, not proved here, so a failure in type D or E would break Theorem 30.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In types A, D, E, q-characters of all modules in C_Z are realized as pullbacks of a map between classical infinite-dimensional affine schemes, giving a geometric meaning to the q-character homomorphism.
  • The fundamental characters on the cross-section A satisfy the Q-system and coincide with the characters Q_k^{(i)} of the relevant Kirillov-Reshetikhin modules, explaining classical character relations such as θ_i = χ_i + ⋯ algorithmically.
  • The cluster expansion of a G-invariant function with respect to the U-invariant seed is a Laurent polynomial in adjacent ratios of generalized minors, and substituting Baxter ratios recovers χ_q; q-characters are thereby computable as cluster expansions.
  • The discrete cross-section theorem (Theorem 33) gives a free action of U^Z with cross-section A^Z, implying the cyclic gauge-action statement of Corollary 40 and yielding a route to discrete W-algebras in the SL(2) case.
  • The cluster structure on the full ring R(G,c) matches the QQ-system for shifted quantum affine algebras, with exchange relations at the red and green vertices being instances of classical generalized-minor identities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could test the deferred identification directly in type E6 or E8: compute H* on a band restricted to a finite window and compare coefficients with an independent recursive computation of χ_q; a mismatch would pinpoint a failure in the cluster-theoretic comparison rather than in the geometric map.
  • The proof of Theorem 33 is noted to work in types B, C, F, G, so a discrete Miura map likely exists in those types too; whether it computes an analogue of q-characters outside the simply-laced case is left open and is a natural testable extension.
  • Because Theorem 30 identifies χ_q with the pullback of a morphism of schemes, questions about q-characters such as positivity or tensor-product structure could be rephrased as classical algebraic-geometry questions on B(G,c).
  • The construction suggests that the QQ-system relations are shadows of generalized-minor identities; checking whether every QQ-system solution arises from suitable band coordinates would provide a concrete bridge to the Bethe-ansatz side of the story.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper is an expository/research hybrid introducing the authors' theory of (G,c)-bands for simple simply connected groups G of type A, D, E and Coxeter elements c. It recalls Steinberg's cross-section theorem and its loop-group analogue, defines the affine scheme B(G,c) of bands and the rings R(G,c), R(G,c)^G, R(G,c)^U, R(G,c)^{U^-}, and states cluster-structure theorems mostly deferred to the companion paper [8]. The main new content is a discrete analogue H of the difference Miura transformation, defined from the twisted Birkhoff decomposition of bands, and the claim (Theorem 30) that H^* coincides with the q-character homomorphism on the discrete category C_Z, thereby verifying a conjecture of Frenkel and Reshetikhin in types A, D, E for all Coxeter elements c. The paper also proves a discrete cross-section theorem (Theorem 33), a Q-system for the functions θ_{i,k} (Proposition 7), and an interpretation of those functions as Kirillov-Reshetikhin characters (Proposition 8).

Significance. If the central comparison in Theorem 30 is fully justified, the paper gives a genuinely geometric construction of q-characters for the category C_Z, unifying Steinberg's cross-section, the difference Drinfeld-Sokolov reduction, and cluster algebras. The explicit construction of the discrete Miura transform H and the cross-section theorem (Theorem 33) are valuable and appear to be proved carefully in the text. Proposition 7 is proved self-containedly, and Proposition 8 gives a nice classical shadow of q-character theory. The main weakness is that the proof of Theorem 30 is not complete in this manuscript: the key identification with χ_q is asserted after a comparison with Baxter relations and relies on cluster-structure isomorphisms whose proofs are deferred to the companion preprint [8]. The scope is also narrower than the abstract suggests: the theorem concerns the discrete subcategory C_Z, not all finite-dimensional modules with arbitrary spectral parameter.

major comments (3)
  1. [§6.1–6.2, Eq. (8), diagram (11)] The commutativity of diagram (11) is the central claim. The proof reduces to the sentence 'Comparing this Laurent polynomial with the one obtained from χ_q(M) via the generalized Baxter's relations,' followed by substitution (8). This comparison is not carried out: it imports Eq. (8) from [22, §5.B] and uses Propositions 26–27, whose proofs are deferred to [8]. No non-type-A example is checked. An unnoticed q-shift or index error in the negative Baxter substitution would break the diagram even if all displayed computations are correct. Please either prove the identification, or state it as an explicit theorem with the precise hypotheses imported from [8] and [22], and include at least one D or E example (e.g. D4 with c=s2s4s1s3s5) verifying the q-powers in Eq. (8).
  2. [Abstract, Theorem 30, §4.1] The abstract says the paper 'calculates the q-characters of the finite-dimensional representations' and the text says Theorem 30 'verifies the expectation of Frenkel and Reshetikhin for all types A,D,E and all Coxeter elements c.' But Theorem 30 is proved only for the subcategory C_Z, whose spectral parameters lie in the discrete set {q^{2s+1-ξ_i}}. The original conjecture concerns q-characters for arbitrary spectral parameter a∈C^*. The discrete analogue H does not directly compute χ_q(M) for general Y_{i,a}. Please either restrict the stated claims to C_Z, or explain how the full conjecture follows by a limit, completion, or extension argument.
  3. [§5.6, Propositions 26–27; §6.1] The image of [M] in R(G,c)^U and R(G,c)^{U^-} used in §6.1 is defined through Propositions 26 and 27, both of which are quoted from [8] without proof. Moreover, Proposition 26 is only injective in non-type-A cases and may not be surjective onto the upper cluster algebra. Since these isomorphisms are load-bearing for the identification of the cluster expansion with χ_q, the paper should state explicitly which results are being assumed from [8], and should distinguish the new proof of Theorem 30 from the parts that are conditional on the companion paper. As written, a failure of Proposition 26 or 27 in type D or E would invalidate the main theorem even though every proof actually included in this text is internally correct.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§1] Typo: 'Reshitikhin' should be 'Reshetikhin' (also in the paragraph after Proposition 8).
  2. [§6.2, diagram (11)] The description of the isomorphism C[(L_{c,e})^Z] ≅ C[Y_{i,q^{2s+1-ξ_i}}] is confusing: 'assigning to the variable Y_{i,q^{2(s+m_i)+1-ξ_i}} the function ... ∆(l(s))' should be phrased as a map Y_{i,q^{2t+1-ξ_i}} ↦ ∆_{w0(ϖ_i),w0(ϖ_i)}(l(t-m_i)) for each t, to make the shift explicit.
  3. [§6.3, Proposition 37] The inductive proof of Proposition 37 is terse; adding a short diagram or explicitly displaying the index ranges for d(s) and x(s) would improve readability. Also, the notation 'x ∈ X' for 'x ∈ X(R)' is used informally.
  4. [§5.4] Theorem 22 states that R(G,c)^U is an upper cluster algebra, and the text notes that in type D/E it is unknown whether the cluster algebra equals its upper cluster algebra. Proposition 26's phrase 'matching the cluster structures' should be made precise in this setting, e.g. by specifying whether the matching is with the cluster subalgebra or the upper cluster algebra.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 30 identifies a geometrically defined H* with chi_q by matching the U^- cluster expansion against external Baxter/cluster-expansion results, not by assuming the conclusion.

full rationale

The central construction in §6.2 defines the discrete Miura transform H purely from the band scheme: it uses the twisted Birkhoff decomposition, the factorization of the quotient morphism B(G,c) -> AZ through (Lc,e)^Z, and the uniqueness of that factorization. No q-character is used in the definition of H. The equality H* = chi_q is then obtained by comparing the U^- cluster expansion of the image of [M] (Proposition 27) with the q-character via the substitution rule (8). Rule (8) is not introduced as a definition of chi_q; it is derived by comparison with the generalized Baxter relations of [9] and the cluster-expansion theorems of [21,22], which are external results that do not assume Theorem 30. The cluster-structure and isomorphism theorems deferred to the companion paper [8] are load-bearing for the setup, but they are stated as proved results of a separate paper and are not shown to depend on Theorem 30 itself. The proof of Proposition 8 does invoke Theorem 30 in §6.4, but Proposition 8 is not used in the proof of Theorem 30, so there is no circular dependency between these two results. The paper is explicit that most proofs are in [8]; this makes the exposition incomplete relative to its claims, but it is a completeness/correctness risk, not a circularity. No fitted parameter is relabelled as a prediction, and the diagram (11) is not commutative by construction: its commutativity is precisely the content of the theorem, established by matching expansion (8) with the pullback via Equation (10). Therefore no specific step reduces to its own input by definition or by self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted numerical parameters: q, c and the shift parameters xi_i are structural choices, not tuned to data. The ledger lists the external theorems and companion-paper results the central claim relies on, plus the two main constructed objects and the quiver data.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption G is simple and simply connected of Cartan type A, D, or E; q in C* is not a root of unity; c is a Coxeter element of W.
    Scope of the paper; stated at the start of section 2.3 and in section 3. The cluster/quantum results are proved only in this setting; Remark 41 notes the cross-section part extends beyond.
  • standard math Steinberg's cross-section theorem and the isomorphism C[A] isomorphic to the character ring of G.
    Theorem 1 quoted from [37], used in sections 2.1 and 2.3 as the basis for A and for the theta_{i,k} functions.
  • standard math Fomin-Zelevinsky generalized minors and identities [7, Theorem 1.17]; double Bruhat cell cluster structures [2].
    Used in the proof of Proposition 7 (identity (3)), in section 5.4, and in the seed for R(G,c) in section 7.1.
  • domain assumption Cluster-structure theorems and P+-grading from the companion preprint [8]: Theorem 13, Theorem 19, Theorem 22, Theorem 43, Propositions 17, 26, 27.
    Stated without proof in sections 4-7; they support Propositions 20, 24, 26, 27 and the diagram (11). This is the main external dependence of the paper.
  • domain assumption Representation-theoretic results: injectivity and cluster structure of the q-character map [13]; generalized Baxter's relations [9]; cluster algebra structure of K0(C_Z) and K0(O+_Z), K0(O-_Z) [20,21,22]; monoidal categorification [26,34]; QQ-systems [10,15].
    Used in sections 5.3, 5.6, 6.1, 7.2 to identify band rings with Grothendieck rings and to justify the substitution rule (8).
  • domain assumption C[L_{c,e}] is the Laurent polynomial ring in the variables Delta_{w0(vari)} and g(s) admits a twisted Birkhoff decomposition on B(G,c)^circ.
    Assumed in section 6.2 to define P, H and the ring isomorphism in diagram (11); the coordinate description of L_{c,e} is asserted without proof.
invented entities (3)
  • The affine scheme of (G,c)-bands B(G,c) and its ring R(G,c)
    purpose: Geometric model whose invariant subrings realize Grothendieck rings of categories C_Z, O+_Z, O-_Z and O^shift_Z; central object of the paper.
    Construction from [8], recalled in section 4; its properties are proven in [8]. It is a defined object, not an unexplained postulate.
  • Discrete Miura transformation H: (L_{c,e})^Z -> A^Z
    purpose: Discrete analogue of the q-difference Miura transform; its pullback is shown to compute q-characters (Theorem 30).
    Newly constructed in section 6.2 via factorization of the quotient morphism; no external falsifiable prediction, but fully specified with cross-section properties proven in section 6.3.
  • Quivers Theta, Xi, Gamma and cluster seeds on the band rings
    purpose: Endow R(G,c)^G, R(G,c)^U and R(G,c) with cluster structures that match the known cluster structures on Grothendieck rings.
    Definitions in sections 5.2, 5.4 and 7.1; the cluster-structure results are from [8].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An introduction to $(G,c)$-bands." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FBENNNET

@misc{pith2026250819066,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An introduction to $(G,c)$-bands},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FBENNNET}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.19066}
}
abstract

We give an introduction to our results on cluster structures for schemes of $(G,c)$-bands emphasizing their connections with seminal works of Frenkel and Reshetikhin in the 90's. In particular we construct using $(G,c)$-bands a discrete analogue of the difference Miura transformation of the loop group $LG$, and we show that it calculates the $q$-characters of the finite-dimensional representations of the quantum affine algebra $U_q(\widehat{\mathfrak{g}})$ of the same $A$, $D$, $E$ type as $G$, thus verifying a conjecture of Frenkel and Reshetikhin.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.19066 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The first 3 layers of the initial seed Θ in type D5 for c = s2s4s1s3s5. (i) i = j and |r − s| = 1, or (ii) r = s and cij = −1. The orientation of these arrows is fixed by the following rules: (iii) the vertical subquivers Θi with vertex set {(i, s) | s > 0} are in sink-source orientation, (iv) the horizontal subquivers Θ(s) with vertex set {(i, s) | i ∈ I} are in sink-source orientation, (v) if cij = −1 the square s… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The labelled quiver Ξ in type A3 with c = s1s3s2. Example 21. Let G be of type A3 and c = s1s3s2. The corresponding labelled quiver Ξ is displayed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The labelled quiver Γ for c = s1s3s2 in type A3. Example 42. Let G be of type A3 and c = s1s3s2. The corresponding labelled quiver Γ is displayed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [8]

    Cluster structures on schemes of bands

    L. Francone, B. Leclerc, Cluster structures on schemes of bands, arXiv:2504.14012. 33

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [13]

    Frenkel, N

    E. Frenkel, N. Reshetikhin, The q-characters of representations of quantum affine algebras and deformations of W-algebras, Contemp. Math., 248, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1999, 163–205

    work page 1999

  3. [22]

    Hernandez, B

    D. Hernandez, B. Leclerc, Cluster algebras and category O for representations of Borel sub- algebras of quantum affine algebras, Algebra Number Theory 10 (2016), 2015–2052

    work page 2016

  4. [1]

    Auslander, I

    M. Auslander, I. Reiten, S. Smalo, Representation theory of Artin algebras, Cambridge Stud- ies in Advanced Mathematics 36, Cambridge University Press 1995

    work page 1995

  5. [2]

    Berenstein, S

    A. Berenstein, S. Fomin, A. Zelevinsky, Cluster algebras III: upper bounds and double Bruhat cells, Duke Math. J. 126 (2005), 1–52

    work page 2005

  6. [3]

    Chari, A

    V . Chari, A. Pressley, Fundamental representations of Yangians and singularities of R- matrices, J. reine angew. Math.417 (1991), 87–128

    work page 1991

  7. [4]

    Chari, A

    V . Chari, A. Pressley,A guide to quantum groups, Cambridge University Press, 1994

    work page 1994

  8. [5]

    Finkelberg, A

    M. Finkelberg, A. Tsymbaliuk, Multiplicative slices, relativistic Toda and shifted quantum affine algebras, Progr. Math., 330 Birkh¨auser/Springer, Cham, 2019, 133–304

    work page 2019

Show all 38 references
  1. [6]

    Fomin, L

    S. Fomin, L. Williams, A. Zelevinsky, Introduction to cluster algebras, Chapter 6 (prelimi- nary version), arXiv:2008.091189

    2008 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Fomin, A

    S. Fomin, A. Zelevinsky, Double Bruhat cells and total positivity, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 12 (1999), 335–380

    1999

  3. [9]

    Frenkel, D

    E. Frenkel, D. Hernandez, Baxter’s relations and spectra of quantum integrable models,Duke Math. J. 164 (2015), 2407–2460

    2015

  4. [10]

    Frenkel, D

    E. Frenkel, D. Hernandez, Extended Baxter relations and QQ-systems for quantum affine algebras, Commun. Math. Phys. 405 (2024)

    2024

  5. [11]

    Frenkel, E

    E. Frenkel, E. Mukhin, Combinatorics of q-characters of finite-dimensional representations of quantum affine algebras, Comm. Math. Phys. 216 (2001), 23–57

    2001

  6. [12]

    Frenkel, N

    E. Frenkel, N. Reshetikhin, Quantum affine algebras and deformations of the Virasoro alge- bra and W -algebras, Comm. Math. Phys. 178 (1996), 237–264

    1996

  7. [14]

    Frenkel, N

    E. Frenkel, N. Reshetikhin, M. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, Drinfeld-Sokolov reduction for dif- ference operators and deformations ofW-algebras I: The case of Virasoro algebra,Commun. Math. Phys. 192 (1998), 605–629

    1998

  8. [15]

    Geiss, D

    C. Geiss, D. Hernandez, B. Leclerc, Representations of shifted quantum affine algebras and cluster algebras I. The simply-laced case. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 129 (2024), no. 3, Paper No. e12630

    2024

  9. [16]

    Geiss, B

    C. Geiss, B. Leclerc, J. Schr ¨oer, Cluster algebra structures and semicanonical bases for unipotent groups, arXiv:math.RT/0703039

  10. [17]

    Hatayama, A

    G. Hatayama, A. Kuniba, M. Okado, T. Takagi, Y . Yamada, Remarks on fermionic formula, Contemp. Math. 248, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1999, 243–291

    1999

  11. [18]

    Hernandez, Representations of shifted quantum affine algebras, Int

    D. Hernandez, Representations of shifted quantum affine algebras, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2023), 13, 11035–11126

    2023

  12. [19]

    Hernandez, M

    D. Hernandez, M. Jimbo, Asymptotic representations and Drinfeld rational fractions, Com- pos. Math. 148 (2012), 1593–1623

    2012

  13. [20]

    Hernandez, B

    D. Hernandez, B. Leclerc, Cluster algebras and quantum affine algebras, Duke Math. J. 154 (2010), 265–341

    2010

  14. [21]

    Hernandez, B

    D. Hernandez, B. Leclerc, A cluster algebra approach to q-characters of Kirillov-Reshetikhin modules, J. Eur. Math. Soc., 18 (2016), 1113–1159

    2016

  15. [23]

    Hernandez, B

    D. Hernandez, B. Leclerc, Quantum affine algebras and cluster algebras, Interactions of Quantum affine algebras, current algebras and categorification , Progress in Math. 337, Birkh¨auser

  16. [24]

    Humphreys, Linear algebraic groups, Springer-Verlag 1975

    J.E. Humphreys, Linear algebraic groups, Springer-Verlag 1975

    1975

  17. [25]

    Kashiwara, On level-zero representations of quantized affine algebras, Duke Math

    M. Kashiwara, On level-zero representations of quantized affine algebras, Duke Math. J. 112 (2002), 117–175. 34

    2002

  18. [26]

    Kashiwara, M

    M. Kashiwara, M. Kim, S-J. Oh, E. Park, Monoidal categorification and quantum affine algebras II, Invent. Math. 236 (2024), 837–924

    2024

  19. [27]

    Kirillov, N

    A.N. Kirillov, N. Reshetikhin, Representations of Yangians and multiplicities of the inclusion of the irreducible components of the tensor product of representations of simple Lie algebras, J. Sov. Math. 52 (1990), 3156–3164

    1990

  20. [28]

    Koroteev, A

    P. Koroteev, A. Zeitlin, q-opers, QQ-systems, and Bethe Ansatz II: generalized minors, J. Reine Angew. Math. 795 (2023), 271–296

    2023

  21. [29]

    Kuniba, T

    A. Kuniba, T. Nakanishi, J. Suzuki, Functional relations in solvable lattice models: I. Func- tional relations and representation theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9 (1994), 5215–5266

    1994

  22. [30]

    Kuniba, T

    A. Kuniba, T. Nakanishi, J. Suzuki, T-systems and Y-systems in integrable systems, J. Phys. A 44 (2011), no. 10, 103001, 146 pp

    2011

  23. [31]

    Nakajima, Quiver varieties and finite-dimensional representations of quantum affine alge- bras, J

    H. Nakajima, Quiver varieties and finite-dimensional representations of quantum affine alge- bras, J. Amer. Math. Soc.14 (2001), 145–238

    2001

  24. [32]

    Nakajima, t-analogs of q-characters of Kirillov-Reshetikhin modules of quantum affine algebras, Represent

    H. Nakajima, t-analogs of q-characters of Kirillov-Reshetikhin modules of quantum affine algebras, Represent. Theory 7 (2003), 259–274

    2003

  25. [33]

    Oya, A note on cluster structure of the coordinate ring of a simple algebraic group, arXiv:2504.09011

    H. Oya, A note on cluster structure of the coordinate ring of a simple algebraic group, arXiv:2504.09011

  26. [34]

    Qin, Triangular bases in quantum cluster algebras and monoidal categorification conjec- tures, Duke Math

    F. Qin, Triangular bases in quantum cluster algebras and monoidal categorification conjec- tures, Duke Math. J. 166 (2017), 2337–2442

    2017

  27. [35]

    F. Qin, M. Yakimov, Partially compactified quantum cluster algebras and coordinate rings of simple algebraic groups, arXiv:2504.05134

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Semenov-Tian-Shansky, A

    M. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, A. Sevostyanov, Drinfeld-Sokolov reduction for difference op- erators and deformations of W-algebras II: The general semisimple case, Commun. Math. Phys. 192 (1998), 631–647

    1998

  29. [37]

    Steinberg, Regular elements of semisimple algebraic groups, Publ

    R. Steinberg, Regular elements of semisimple algebraic groups, Publ. Sci. I.H.E.S 25 (1965), 49–80

    1965

  30. [38]

    S.-W. Yang, A. Zelevinsky, Cluster algebras of finite type via Coxeter elements and principal minors, Transformation Groups 13 (2008), 855–895. Luca FRANCONE Universit`a degli studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Dipartimento di Matematica, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Roma em...

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.