Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 44 references

Temperature dependent single- and double-quantum relaxation of negatively charged boron vacancies in hexagonal boron nitride

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For boron vacancies in hexagonal boron nitride, the double-quantum spin relaxation rate grows faster with temperature than the single-quantum rate, reaching five times it at 400 K and dominating high-temperature spin-phonon decoherence.

desk verdict Useful new gamma(T) dataset for V_B- in hBN, but the model attribution outruns the five-temperature fit. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.14358 v1 pith:FBFX3R4B submitted 2025-06-17 quant-ph

Lin-Ke Xie , Wei Liu , Kaiyu Huang , Nai-Jie Guo , Jun-You Liu , Yu-Hang Ma , Ya-Qi Wu , Yi-Tao Wang
show 9 more authors
Zhao-an Wang Xiao-Dong Zeng Jia-Ming Ren Chun Ao Shuo Deng Haifei Lu Jian-Shun Tang Chuan-Feng Li Guang-Can Guo
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords hexagonalboronnitridevacancydouble-quantumrelaxationsingle-quantumspin-phononinteractionquantumsensingtemperaturedependencespincoherence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to measure how the spin relaxation of negatively charged boron vacancies in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) changes with temperature, separately for single-quantum transitions between the $m_s=0$ and $m_s=\pm1$ levels and double-quantum transitions between $m_s=-1$ and $m_s=+1$. Over 293 to 393 K, both relaxation rates rise, but the double-quantum rate $\gamma$ rises much faster than the single-quantum rate $\Omega$, and the authors argue that by 400 K $\gamma$ is about five times $\Omega$. They attribute this behavior to second-order spin-phonon interactions with three effective phonon modes, with the highest-energy mode responsible for the rapid growth. If correct, the result identifies the dominant decoherence channel at high temperature and gives a concrete target for extending the coherence time of hBN spin sensors.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a second-order spin-phonon relaxation model, adapted from nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, plus a three-mode phonon spectral input. The relaxation rates are written as $\Omega(T)=\sum_{i=1,2,3} A_i n_i(n_i+1)+A_S$ and $\gamma(T)=\sum_{i=1,2,3} B_i n_i(n_i+1)+B_S$, where $n_i=(e^{\hbar\omega_i/k_B T}-1)^{-1}$ is the thermal occupation number of the $i$-th effective phonon mode, $A_i,B_i$ are temperature-independent coupling coefficients, and $A_S,B_S$ absorb sample-specific constants. The phonon energies come from a density-functional-theory phonon density of states, whose three peaks at 23.48, 77.39 and 165.75 meV are taken as the modes that dominate relaxation. The experimental identification is carried by two fluorescence pulse sequences whose decays are governed by $3\Omega$ and $2\gamma+\Omega$, allowing the two rates to be separated.

What would settle it

Extend the relaxation measurements from 393 K to 450 K or higher on the same defect arrays. The model predicts $\gamma$ will keep growing with the thermal occupation factor of the 165.75 meV mode and remain several times $\Omega$; if $\gamma$ saturates, crosses $\Omega$, or the ratio drops, the claimed high-temperature dominance and its attribution to the high-energy phonon mode would be falsified. An independent check is to compute the coupling coefficients $A_i$ and $B_i$ from first principles and see whether the 165.75 meV mode actually has the largest values.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the double-quantum relaxation rate $\gamma$ of the $V_\mathrm{B}^-$ center in hBN grows with temperature faster than the single-quantum rate $\Omega$, and that this growth is governed by second-order spin-phonon interactions with three effective phonon modes. Using two pulse sequences, the authors isolate decays at rates $3\Omega$ and $2\gamma+\Omega$, and from fits they extract $\Omega$ and $\gamma$ from 293 to 393 K in two defect ensembles. They find both rates increase with temperature, with $\gamma$ rising rapidly enough that at 400 K it reaches five times $\Omega$. Applying a model of the form $\Omega(T)=\sum_i A_i n_i(n_i+1)+A_S$ and $\gamma(T)=\sum_i B_i n_i(n_i+1)+B_S$, with thermal occupation numbers $n_i$ for phonon energies 23.48, 77.39, and 165.75 meV, the authors reproduce the measurements and find that the higher-energy phonon mode has the larger coupling coefficients. They conclude that double-quantum relaxation may dominate the spin-phonon decoherence channel at high temperature, so the total spin-lattice relaxation time obeys $1/T_1 = 3\Omega + \gamma$ with $\gamma$ setting the limit.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the boron vacancy relaxes by the same two-phonon process used for nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, with three fixed vibration modes and temperature-independent coupling strengths, and that no other relaxation mechanism such as magnetic noise or local defects contributes significantly.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At high temperature, the $|m_s=-1\rangle$ to $|m_s=+1\rangle$ double-quantum channel, not the single-quantum channel, is the main spin-phonon decoherence path for the boron vacancy in hBN.
  • Because the total spin-lattice relaxation time obeys $1/T_1 = 3\Omega + \gamma$, a double-quantum rate several times $\Omega$ makes $\gamma$ the quantity that sets the high-temperature $T_1$ limit.
  • The highest-energy effective phonon mode (165.75 meV) carries the largest coupling coefficients, so high-temperature relaxation is driven by high-frequency lattice vibrations rather than by the lowest phonon mode.
  • The same second-order relaxation model, applied to other spin defects in hBN, would predict which quantum channel limits their coherence at elevated temperatures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the fitted coupling coefficients are not uniquely pinned by the data unless the model's functional form is right; an independent first-principles calculation of the coefficients, or a measurement at temperatures far above 393 K, is needed to confirm that the 165.75 meV mode is the true driver.
  • Beyond the paper: a direct extension above 400 K would turn the extrapolated five-fold ratio into a measured fact; if $\gamma$ continues to follow the thermal occupation factor of the high-energy mode, the claimed dominance is strengthened, and if not, the model would need revision.
  • Beyond the paper: if double-quantum relaxation dominates, coherence stored in the $m_s=\pm1$ subspace is especially fragile; strategies that reshape the phonon environment, such as strain engineering or encapsulation, become a natural path to longer coherence times.
  • Beyond the paper: the sample-related constants $A_S$ and $B_S$ may be absorbing non-phonon relaxation such as magnetic noise; comparing samples with different defect densities or isotopic compositions would separate intrinsic phonon effects from ensemble artifacts.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports measurements of the single-quantum (Ω) and double-quantum (γ) spin relaxation rates of negatively charged boron vacancies (V_B−) in hexagonal boron nitride over 293–393 K, using standard optical/microwave pulse sequences on two defect ensembles (Spot 1 and Spot 2). Both rates increase with temperature, with γ rising faster than Ω. The authors extrapolate that γ reaches five times Ω above 400 K. They fit the temperature dependence with a second-order spin-phonon model containing three effective phonon modes at 23.48, 77.39, and 165.75 meV, whose energies are taken from a DFT phonon density of states, plus sample-dependent constants. From the fit they conclude that the higher-energy phonon mode dominates high-temperature relaxation.

Significance. If the attribution holds, this is the first temperature-dependent double-quantum relaxation dataset for V_B− in hBN and identifies a regime where double-quantum relaxation may dominate spin-phonon decoherence. The experimental method is conventional and the two-spot reproducibility is a strength. However, the central mechanism claim currently rests on an imported NV-in-diamond model, an under-reported fit, and an extrapolation beyond the measured temperature range. The dataset itself is valuable and publishable, but the quantitative attribution needs additional transparency and falsifiability before it can be accepted as established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section II, Eqs. (2)-(3), Fig. 3(d)] The fits of Ω(T) and γ(T) use four parameters each (A1,A2,A3,A_S and B1,B2,B3,B_S) against only five temperatures per spot, but the manuscript gives no fitted parameter values, no parameter uncertainties, no residuals, and no reduced chi-square. Over 293–393 K the three Bose factors n_i(n_i+1) are smooth and strongly correlated, so the decomposition into three effective modes is not shown to be unique. Without fit-quality metrics, the statement in Section II that 'the higher energy phonon mode, the greater the coupling coefficient' and the resulting high-energy-mode attribution are not supported. The Supporting Information Section 4, cited for this result, is not available to the reader.
  2. [Section II and Abstract] The claim 'At 400 K, γ can reach the values five times of Ω' is an extrapolation, not a measurement: the highest measured temperature is 393 K, and the model is only fitted over 293–393 K. The factor of five depends on the assumed model and on fitted coefficients whose uncertainties are not reported. This sentence should be explicitly labeled as a model extrapolation, or the claim should be supported by data at or above 400 K.
  3. [Section II, 'Analogize to V_B spins'] The second-order spin-phonon model from NV centers in diamond [37] is transferred to V_B− in hBN by analogy, without independent validation. The model assumes only second-order processes with temperature-independent coupling coefficients and a three-peak phonon spectral function; it neglects first-order processes, local modes, temperature-dependent couplings, and magnetic noise. Since the high-energy-mode attribution is conditional on this specific model being valid, the manuscript should include at least a sensitivity test or a comparison with a simpler alternative (e.g., a one-mode model or a model allowing first-order terms) to show that the neglected contributions do not change the conclusion.
  4. [Fig. 3(c) and Section II] The phonon energies used in Eqs. (2)-(3) are taken from the DFT phonon density of states of a defective 3×3 monolayer hBN, while the experiment is performed on a mechanically exfoliated flake from bulk hBN. The manuscript does not discuss whether the monolayer phonon spectrum is representative of the multilayer/bulk sample. Because the phonon energies enter directly into the Bose factors and therefore control the fitted decomposition, this approximation needs an explicit justification or a sensitivity analysis.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous grammatical errors (e.g., 'is limited spin-phonon interactions' in the abstract, 'drives spin-lattice relaxation ... play a crucial role' in the Introduction); a careful proofread is needed.
  2. [Fig. 3(d)] The figure does not show error bars for the relaxation rates, although the room-temperature values are quoted with uncertainties; without error bars it is difficult to judge whether the faster rise of γ relative to Ω is statistically significant.
  3. [Fig. 3(c) caption] The phrase 'first-principle calcutations' is a typo for 'first-principle calculations'.
  4. [References to Supporting Information] The manuscript repeatedly cites Supporting Information Sections 2 and 4 for essential derivations and fitting details, but the Supporting Information is not included with the arXiv submission; the published version must include it for the claims to be verifiable.
  5. [Notation] The spin sublevel notation is inconsistent ('ms' vs 'm_s'); it should be uniformly typeset as 'm_s' throughout the text and figures.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: measured relaxation rates, external phonon-mode inputs, and post-fit interpretation remain independent.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The central measured quantities, Omega and gamma, are extracted from independent time-domain relaxation measurements: F1(tau) is proportional to exp(-3*Omega*tau) and F2(tau) is proportional to exp(-(2*gamma+Omega)*tau), with the exponents obtained from rate equations for the triplet sublevels. These rates are not defined in terms of the fitted model. The theoretical model in Eqs. (2)-(3) is imported from external prior work on NV centers in diamond (Ref. [37]) and the three effective phonon energies (23.48, 77.39, 165.75 meV) come from independent DFT phonon density-of-states calculations (Refs. [36,44]); neither is from the present authors, so there is no load-bearing self-citation chain. The coupling coefficients A_i, B_i, A_S, B_S are free parameters fitted to the measured rates, so the statement that the higher-energy mode dominates is a post-fit inference, not a quantity predicted from the model independently of the data. The 'five times at 400 K' claim is a modest model extrapolation beyond the measured 393 K point, but extrapolation is not circular: it is not statistically forced at the fitted points by construction, and the paper does not relabel a fitted parameter as a prediction. The omission of fit parameters, uncertainties, and the Supporting Information affects verifiability and the strength of the attribution, but it does not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs. No step exhibits self-definition, a renamed empirical pattern, or an imported uniqueness theorem, so the paper merits a circularity score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities are introduced. The central model is imported from prior work, and the free parameters are the eight coupling and offset constants fitted to the measured rates. The phonon energies are independent DFT inputs, not free parameters.

free parameters (4)
  • A1, A2, A3 (Omega phonon coupling coefficients) = not reported in main text
    Fit parameters in Eq. (2) matched to measured Omega(T) data; only their relative ordering is reported qualitatively.
  • B1, B2, B3 (gamma phonon coupling coefficients) = not reported in main text
    Fit parameters in Eq. (3) matched to measured gamma(T) data.
  • A_S (Omega sample-related constant) = not reported
    Additive constant in Eq. (2), fitted to data.
  • B_S (gamma sample-related constant) = not reported
    Additive constant in Eq. (3), fitted to data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Second-order spin-phonon interaction model from NV centers in diamond applies to V_B- in hBN.
    Invoked in Section II 'Analogize to V_B spins...' before Eqs. (2)-(3).
  • domain assumption The three DFT phonon peaks at 23.48, 77.39, 165.75 meV are the dominant effective modes for spin relaxation.
    Taken from first-principles PDOS; used as the only modes in Eqs. (2)-(3).
  • domain assumption Thermal occupation follows Bose-Einstein statistics with ni(ni+1) weighting, and coupling coefficients are temperature-independent.
    Built into Eqs. (2)-(3); not independently verified for V_B-.
  • standard math The rate equation solution F1 ~ exp(-3 Omega tau) and F2 ~ exp(-(2 gamma + Omega) tau) assumes equal Omega for 0 to +/-1 transitions and no additional decay channels.
    Used in Section II and Supporting Information Section 2; algebra is standard given the level scheme.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Temperature dependent single- and double-quantum relaxation of negatively charged boron vacancies in hexagonal boron nitride." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FBFX3R4B

@misc{pith2026250614358,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Temperature dependent single- and double-quantum relaxation of negatively charged boron vacancies in hexagonal boron nitride},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FBFX3R4B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.14358}
}
read the original abstract

The negatively charged boron vacancy in two-dimensional hexagonal boron nitride has emerged as a promising candidate for quantum sensing. The coherence time of this defect spins which coherent quantum sensing resides in is limited spin-phonon interactions, while the underlying physical mechanism of the corresponding high-temperature behavior is still not fully understood. Here, we probe the single- and double-quantum relaxation rates on this center over the temperature range from 293 to 393 K. The results show that both relaxation rates increase with increasing temperature, and the double-quantum relaxation rate significantly increases rapidly. At high temperature (above 400 K), the double-quantum relaxation rate is much greater than single-quantum relaxation rate, and may dominate the decoherence channel of spin-phonon interactions. Using a theoretical model of second-order spin-phonon interactions, we attribute the high-temperature spin relaxation rates to interactions with higher-energy effective phonon mode, aiding the further understanding and guiding high-temperature sensing applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.14358 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) Schematic of the V [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (a) Simplified structural diagram of triplet ground state of V [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (a) Temperature dependent normalized fluorescence decay data ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [37]

    M. C. Cambria, A. Norambuena, H. T. Dinani, G. Thier- ing, A. Gardill, I. Kemeny, Y. Li, V. Lordi, A. Gali, J. R. Maze, and S. Kolkowitz, Temperature-dependent spin- lattice relaxation of the nitrogen-vacancy spin triplet in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 256903 (2023)

    2023

  2. [1]

    Kurtsiefer, S

    C. Kurtsiefer, S. Mayer, P. Zarda, and H. Weinfurter, Stable solid-state source of single photons, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 290 (2000)

    work page 2000

  3. [2]

    Jelezko, T

    F. Jelezko, T. Gaebel, I. Popa, A. Gruber, and J. Wrachtrup, Observation of coherent oscillations in a sin- gle electron spin, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 076401 (2004)

    work page 2004

  4. [3]

    Balasubramanian, P

    G. Balasubramanian, P. Neumann, D. Twitchen, M. Markham, R. Kolesov, N. Mizuochi, J. Isoya, J. Achard, J. Beck, J. Tissler, V. Jacques, P. R. Hemmer, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, Ultralong spin coherence time in isotopi- cally engineered diamond, Nat. Mater.8, 383-387 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [4]

    E. D. Herbschleb, H. Kato, Y. Maruyama, T. Danjo, T. Makino, S. Yamasaki, I. Ohki, K. Hayashi, H. Mor- ishita, M. Fujiwara, and N. Mizuochi, Ultra-long coher- ence times amongst room-temperature solid-state spins, Nat. Commun.10, 3766 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [5]

    W. F. Koehl, B. B. Buckley, F. J. Heremans, G. Calu- sine, and D. D. Awschalom, Room temperature coherent control of defect spin qubits in silicon carbide, Nature 479, 84-87 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [6]

    Castelletto, B

    S. Castelletto, B. C. Johnson, V. Iv´ ady, N. Stavrias, T. Umeda, A. Gali, and T. Ohshima, A silicon carbide room- temperature single-photon source, Nat. Mater.13, 151- 156 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [7]

    Widmann, S

    M. Widmann, S. Y. Lee, T. Rendler, N. T. Son, H. Fed- der, S. Paik, L. P. Yang, N. Zhao, S. Yang, I. Booker, A. Denisenko, M. Jamali, S. A. Momenzadeh, I. Gerhardt, T. Ohshima, A. Gali, E. Janzen, J. Wrachtrup, Coherent control of single spins in silicon carbide at room temper- ature, Nat. Mater.14, 164-168 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 44 references
  1. [8]

    Romach, C

    Y. Romach, C. M¨ uller, T. Unden, L. J. Rogers, T. Isoda, K. M. Itoh, M. Markham, A. Stacey, J. Meijer, S. Pez- zagna, B. Naydenov, L. P. McGuinness, N. Bar-Gill, F. Jelezko, Spectroscopy of surface-induced noise using shallow spins in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 017601 (2015)

    2015

  2. [9]

    Liu, N.-J

    W. Liu, N.-J. Guo, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-P. Li, Y.-Z. Yang, Z.-A. Wang, X.-D. Zeng, L.-K. Xie, Q. Li, J.-F. Wang, J.-S. Xu, Y.-T. Wang, J.-S. Tang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, Spin-active defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Mater. Quantum. Technol.2, 032002 (2022)

    2022

  3. [10]

    Gottscholl, M

    A. Gottscholl, M. Kianinia, V. Soltamov, S. Orlinskii, G. Mamin, C. Bradac, C. Kasper, K. Krambrock, A. Sper- lich, M. Toth, I. Aharonovich, and V. Dyakonov, Ini- tialization and read-out of intrinsic spin defects in a van der Waals crystal at room temperature, Nat. Mater.19, ...

    2020

  4. [11]

    Mendelson, D

    N. Mendelson, D. Chugh, J. R. Reimers, T. S. Cheng, A. Gottscholl, L. Hu, C. J. Mellor, A. Zettl, V. Dyakonov, P. H. Beton, S. V. Novikov, C. Jagadish, H. H. Tan, M. J. Ford, M. Toth, C. Bradac, I. Aharonovich, Identifying carbon as the source of visible single photon emission...

    2021

  5. [12]

    Chejansovsky, A

    N. Chejansovsky, A. Mukherjee, J. Geng, Y.-C. Chen, Y. Kim, A. Denisenko, A. Finkler, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, D. B. R. Dasari, P. Auburger, A. Gali, J. H. Smet, J. Wrachtrup, Single-spin resonance in a van der Waals em- bedded paramagnetic defect, Nat. Mater.20, 1079-1084 (2021)

    2021

  6. [13]

    H. L. Stern, Q. Gu, J. Jarman, S. E. Barker, N. Mendel- son, D. Chugh, S. Schott, H. H. Tan, H. Sirringhaus, I. Aharonovich, M. Atat¨ ure, Room-temperature optically detected magnetic resonance of single defects in hexago- nal boron nitride, Nat. Commun.13, 618 (2022)

    2022

  7. [14]

    N. -J. Guo, S. Li, W. Liu, Y.-Z. Yang, X.-D. Zeng, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-P. Li, Z.-A. Wang, L.-K. Xie, R.-C. Ge, J.-F. Wang, Q. Li, J.-S. Xu, Y.-T. Wang, J.-S. Tang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, Coherent control of an ultrabright single spin in hexagonal boron nitride at room temperature...

    2023

  8. [15]

    Yang, T.-X

    Y.-Z. Yang, T.-X. Zhu, Z.-P. Li, X.-D. Zeng, N.-J. Guo, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-A. Wang, L.-K. Xie, Z.-Q. Zhou, Q. Li, J.-S. Xu, X.-Y. Gao, W. Liu, Y.-T. Wang, J.-S. Tang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, Laser direct writing of visible spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride for applications ...

    2023

  9. [16]

    H. L. Stern, C. M. Gilardoni, Q. Gu, S. E. Barker, O. F. J. Powell, X. Deng, S. A. Fraser, L. Follet, C. Li, A. J. Ramsay, H. H. Tan, I. Aharonovich, M. Atat¨ ure, A quan- tum coherent spin in hexagonal boron nitride at ambient conditions, Nat. Mater.23,23, 1379-1385 (2024)

    2024

  10. [17]

    S. C. Scholten, P. Singh, A. J. Healey, I. O. Robertson, G. Haim, C. Tan, D. A. Broadway, L. Wang, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, M. Kianinia, P. Reineck, I. Aharonovich, 6 J.-P. Tetienne, Multi-species optically addressable spin defects in a van der Waals material, Nat. Commun.15, 6727 (2024)

    2024

  11. [18]

    W. Liu, S. Li, N.-J. Guo, X.-D. Zeng, L.-K. Xie, Y.-H. Ma, Y.-Q. Wu, Y.-T. Wang, Z.-A. Wang, J.-M. Ren, C. Ao, J.-S. Xu, J.-S. Tang, A. Gali, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, Experimental observation of spin defects in van der Waals material GeS2, arXiv:2410.18892 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Gottscholl, M

    A. Gottscholl, M. Diez, V. Soltamov, C. Kasper, A. Sper- lich, M. Kianinia, C. Bradac, I. Aharonovich, and V. Dyakonov, Room temperature coherent control of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Sci. Adv.7, eabf3630 (2021)

    2021

  13. [20]

    W. Liu, V. Iv´ ady, Z.-P. Li, Y.-Z. Yang, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-A. Wang, N.-J. Guo, F.-F. Yan, Q. Li, J.-F. Wang, J.-S. Xu, X. Liu, Z.-Q. Zhou, X.-D. Chen, F.-W. Sun, Y.- T. Wang, J.-S. Tang, A. Gali, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Coherent dynamics of multi-spin V− B center in hexagon...

    2022

  14. [21]

    M. Abdi, J. P. Chou, A. Gali, and M. B. Plenio, Color centers in hexagonal boron nitride monolayers: a group theory and ab initio analysis, ACS Photon.5,1967-1976 (2018)

    2018

  15. [22]

    Iv´ ady, G

    V. Iv´ ady, G. Barcza, G. Thiering, S. Li, H. Hamdi, J. Chou, ¨O. Legeza, and A. Gali, Ab initio theory of the neg- atively charged boron vacancy qubit in hexagonal boron nitride, npj Coumput. Mater.6, 41 (2020)

    2020

  16. [23]

    X. Y. Gao, S. Pandey, M. Kianinia, J. Ahn, P. Ju, I. Aharonovich, N. Shivaram, and T. C. Li, Femtosecond laser writing of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, ACS Photon.8, 994-1000 (2021)

    2021

  17. [24]

    N.-J. Guo, W. Liu, Z.-P. Li, Y.-Z. Yang, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-A. Wang, X.-D. Zeng, F.-F. Yan, Q. Li, J.-F. Wang, J.- S. Xu, Y.-T. Wang, J.-S. Tang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Generation of spin defects by ion implantation in hexag- onal boron nitride,ACS Omega7, 1733-1739 (2022)

    2022

  18. [25]

    H. D. Liang, Y. Chen, C. Y. Yang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Eda, and A. A. Bettiol, High sensitivity spin defects in hBN created by high-energy He beam ir- radiation,Adv. Opt. Mater.11, 2201941 (2023)

    2023

  19. [26]

    Vaidya, X

    S. Vaidya, X. Gao, S. Dikshit, I. Aharonovich, and T. Li, Quantum sensing and imaging with spin defects in hexag- onal boron nitride, Adv. Phys.-X8, 2206049 (2023)

    2023

  20. [27]

    Gottscholl, M

    A. Gottscholl, M. Diez, V. Soltamov, C. Kasper, D. Krauße, A. Sperlich, M. Kianinia, C. Bradac, I. Aharonovich, and V. Dyakonov, Spin defects in hBN as promising temperature, pressure and magnetic field quantum sensors, Nat. Commun.12, 4480 (2021)

    2021

  21. [28]

    Liu, Z.-P

    W. Liu, Z.-P. Li, Y.-Z. Yang, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-A. Wang, Z.-C. Li, N.-J. Guo, F.-F. Yan, Q. Li, J.-F. Wang, J.-S. Xu, Y.-T. Wang, J.-S. Tang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Temperature-dependent energy-level shifts of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, ACS Photon.8, 1889- 1895 (2021)

    2021

  22. [29]

    A. J. Healey, S. C. Scholten, T. Yang, J. A. Scott, G. J. Abrahams, I. O. Robertson, X. F. Hou, Y. F. Guo, S. Rahman, Y. Lu, M. Kianinia, I. Aharonovich, and J.- P. Tetienne, Quantum microscopy with van der Waals heterostructures,Nat. Phys.19, 87-91 (2023)

    2023

  23. [30]

    X. Gao, S. Vaidya, P. Ju, S. DIkshit, K. Shen, Y. P. Chen, and T. Li, Quantum sensing of paramagnetic spins in liquids with spin qubits in hexagonal boron nitride, ACS Photon.10, 2894-2900 (2023)

    2023

  24. [31]

    I. O. Robertson, S. C. Scholten, P. Singh, A. J. Healey, F. Meneses, P. Reineck, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, M. Kianinia, I. Aharonovich, and J.-P. Tetienne, Detection of param- agnetic spins with an ultrathin van der Waals quantum sensor, ACS Nano17, 13408-13417 (2023)

    2023

  25. [32]

    X.-D. Zeng, W. Liu, Y.-Z. Yang, N.-J. Guo, L.-K. Xie, J.-Y. Liu, Y.-H. Ma, Y.-T. Wang, Z.-P. Li, Z.-A. Wang, J.-M. Ren, J.-S. Xu, J.-S. Tang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Ambient pressure response of spin defects in two- dimensional materials, Nanoscale (2025)

    2025

  26. [33]

    Norambuena, E

    A. Norambuena, E. Mu˜ noz, H. T. Dinani, A. Jarmola, P. Maletinsky, D. Budker, and J. R. Maze, Spin-lattice relaxation of individual solid-state spins, Phys. Rev. B 97, 094304 (2018)

    2018

  27. [34]

    J. Xu, A. Habib, S. Kumar, F. Wu, R. Sundararaman, and Y. Ping, Spin-phonon relaxation from a universal ab initio density-matrix approach, Nat. Commun.11, 2780 (2020)

    2020

  28. [35]

    Lunghi, Toward exact predictions of spin-phonon re- laxation times: An ab initio implementation of open quantum systems theory, Sci

    A. Lunghi, Toward exact predictions of spin-phonon re- laxation times: An ab initio implementation of open quantum systems theory, Sci. Adv.8, eabn7880 (2022)

    2022

  29. [36]

    Z. Liu, R. Gong, B. Huang, Y. Jin, X. Du, G. He, E. Janzen, L. Yang, E. A. Henriksen, J. H. Edgar, G. Galli, and C. Zu, Temperature-dependent spin-phonon coupling of boron-vacancy centers in hexagonal boron ni- tride, Phys. Rev. B111, 024108 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    X. Gao, B. Jiang, A. E. L. Allcca, K. Shen, M. A¿ Sadi, A. B. Solanki, P. Ju, Z. Xu, P. Upadhyaya, Y. P. Chen, S. A. Bhave, and T. Li, High-contrast plasmonic-enhanced shallow spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride for quan- tum sensing, Nano Lett.21, 7708-7714 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Zeng, Y.-Z

    X.-D. Zeng, Y.-Z. Yang, N.-J. Guo, Z.-P. Li, Z.-A. Wang, L.-K. Xie, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Q. Li, J.-S. Xu, W. Liu, Y.- T. Wang, J.-S. Tang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Reflec- tive dielectric cavity enhanced emission from hexagonal boron nitride spin defect arrays, Nanoscale15, 15000- ...

    2023

  32. [40]

    B. A. Myers, A. Ariyaratne, and A. C. B. Jayich, Double- quantum spin-relaxation limits to coherence of near- surface nitrogen-vacancy centers, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 197201 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    Kresse, and J

    G. Kresse, and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency of ab-initio to- tal energy calculations for metals and semiconductors us- ing a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci.6,15-50 (1996)

    1996

  34. [42]

    Kresse, and J

    G. Kresse, and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  35. [43]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  36. [44]

    Estaji, I

    N. Estaji, I. A. Sarsari, G. Thiering, and A. Gali, Spin-phonon relaxation of boron-vacancy centers in two- dimensional boron nitride polytypes, arXiv:2504.00154 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.