Pith. sign in

REVIEW

BayesIMP: Uncertainty Quantification for Causal Data Fusion

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.03477 v1 pith:FBTX2KX5 submitted 2021-06-07 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords causaluncertaintydataquantificationbayesianfusioninterventionalkernel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While causal models are becoming one of the mainstays of machine learning, the problem of uncertainty quantification in causal inference remains challenging. In this paper, we study the causal data fusion problem, where datasets pertaining to multiple causal graphs are combined to estimate the average treatment effect of a target variable. As data arises from multiple sources and can vary in quality and quantity, principled uncertainty quantification becomes essential. To that end, we introduce Bayesian Interventional Mean Processes, a framework which combines ideas from probabilistic integration and kernel mean embeddings to represent interventional distributions in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space, while taking into account the uncertainty within each causal graph. To demonstrate the utility of our uncertainty estimation, we apply our method to the Causal Bayesian Optimisation task and show improvements over state-of-the-art methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools