Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Generation and detection of squeezed light on a single silicon photonic chip

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single monolithic silicon photonic chip, made on a commercial foundry process, generates and detects squeezed light entirely on-chip, directly measuring 0.25(1) dB of squeezing at room temperature.

desk verdict First monolithic CV source-plus-detector on SOI; direct 0.25 dB squeezing measurement is credible, but the inferred efficiency chain doesn't add up. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15461 v1 pith:FDALKN4D submitted 2026-07-16 quant-ph

Oliver M. Green , Bethany Puzio , Rowan A. Hoggarth , Rachel N. Clark , Edward C. R. Deacon , Alex S. Clark , Jonathan C. F. Matthews , Giacomo Ferranti This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords squeezedlightsiliconphotonicshomodynedetectionspontaneousfour-wavemixingcontinuous-variablequantummonolithicintegrationroom-temperaturenonlinearloss
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a monolithic silicon-on-insulator photonic chip can both generate and detect squeezed light entirely on-chip. A spiral silicon waveguide produces squeezed vacuum by spontaneous four-wave mixing; cascaded interferometers strip away the pump, and the squeezed field is measured by an integrated balanced homodyne detector. The authors directly observe 0.25(1) dB of squeezing, infer 0.42(2) dB at the detector, and estimate 0.83(3) dB generated before losses. If correct, this is the first continuous-variable quantum photonic device with source and detector co-integrated on a single chip, pointing toward mass-manufacturable, room-temperature quantum technologies.

What carries the argument

The central object is the monolithic SOI photonic circuit: a spiral waveguide source using spontaneous four-wave mixing, cascaded asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometers as pump filters, and an on-chip balanced homodyne detector built from a tunable Mach-Zehnder beam splitter and two waveguide-coupled germanium photodiodes. The dual-pump scheme and spectrally shaped local oscillator select a single Schmidt mode from the highly multimode squeezed field (Schmidt number 34.7). The model ΔX² = 1-η+ηe^{±g} with a power-dependent gain g accounts for two-photon and cross-two-photon absorption, which set the ceiling on achievable squeezing.

What would settle it

Measure the homodyne variance with the pump blocked (so no squeezing is generated) at the same local oscillator power and detector settings, sweep the local oscillator phase, and apply the same noise-subtraction and normalization routine; if the subtracted variance trace shows any phase-dependent dip below 1 (shot noise) or does not sit flat at 1 across the full ramp, the 0.25 dB squeezing claim is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors report direct evidence of squeezed light generation from silicon-on-insulator waveguides, achieved by generating and detecting degenerate squeezed vacuum states within one photonic integrated circuit. A bichromatic pulsed pump coupled into a 1.1 cm spiral waveguide drives spontaneous four-wave mixing; two cascaded asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometers filter the pump, and the squeezed field is measured by an on-chip balanced homodyne detector with germanium photodiodes. The measured variance dips 0.25(1) dB below shot noise with the expected π-periodic phase dependence, and the squeezing scales with pump power as the model predicts. Removing detector inefficiency yields 0.42(2)

Load-bearing premise

The result depends on the electronic noise floor being subtracted from the shot-noise and signal variances without bias; at the operating point the detector's shot-noise clearance is only 6.67 dB, so the claimed 0.25 dB squeezing (a ~6% variance reduction) is comparable in size to any small error in that subtraction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Silicon-on-insulator becomes a viable platform for continuous-variable quantum photonics: generation, filtering, and detection can all be done on a single commercial chip.
  • On-chip detection removes the chip-to-fibre coupling loss that dominates external squeezing measurements, so even modest source efficiency can yield measurable squeezing.
  • Nonlinear loss mechanisms cap on-chip measured squeezing at about 0.26 dB on this device, so higher squeezing requires longer pump wavelengths or other mitigation.
  • Room-temperature operation and a 1.44 mm² footprint open the way to portable quantum sensors and scalable arrays of continuous-variable quantum devices.
  • The demonstrated source-plus-detector integration is a step toward monolithic continuous-variable cluster states and GKP qubits, where many squeezed modes and homodyne measurements must coexist on one chip.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the result is robust, the same integration recipe could be extended to multi-channel devices, where many squeezed sources and detectors are monolithically combined—a configuration that is impractical with fibre-coupled external detection.
  • The 0.25 dB figure includes all on-chip losses, so the nonclassicality generated at the source is several times larger; future design changes that reduce linear loss could translate directly into higher detected squeezing.
  • Because a single Schmidt mode is selected by shaping the local oscillator spectrum, the same chip could support mode-multiplexed quantum operations simply by reprogramming the local oscillator profile.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a monolithic silicon-on-insulator photonic integrated circuit that generates squeezed vacuum via spontaneous four-wave mixing in a spiral waveguide and detects it with on-chip balanced germanium photodiodes in a pulsed homodyne configuration. The authors directly measure 0.25(1) dB of squeezing, infer 0.42(2) dB entering the detector by correcting for detector inefficiency, and use a power-dependent fit to Eqs. (2)-(3) to extract the waveguide nonlinearity γ and linear loss η_L, from which they quote a generated squeezing level of 0.83(3) dB. They argue this is the first monolithic integration of a continuous-variable source and homodyne detector on a CMOS-compatible, commercially available platform, and that it provides direct evidence of squeezed-light generation from SOI waveguides. The paper also presents a Schmidt-mode analysis (K = 34.7), an LO mode-overlap optimisation, and a discussion of nonlinear-loss limits including a predicted 0.26 dB ceiling for this device.

Significance. If the calibration chain is sound, this is a significant advance for scalable continuous-variable quantum photonics: it removes off-chip coupling loss for squeezed-state detection and leverages a commercial MPW process, making replication accessible. The direct measurement of sub-shot-noise variance, the power-scaling data, and the honest treatment of nonlinear loss are strengths. However, the quantitative hierarchy 0.25 dB → 0.42 dB → 0.83 dB is not fully auditable from the main text, and the inferred values are model-dependent. The core integration result is plausible, but the calibration and fitting must be clarified before the quantitative claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Squeezing estimation, Eq. (2)] The quoted inference of 0.42(2) dB entering the detector is inconsistent with Eq. (2) and the stated η_HD = 0.83. For V_min = 10^{-0.25/10} = 0.944 and V_min = 1 − η + η V_in, using η = 0.83 gives V_in = 0.933, i.e. 0.30 dB. Reproducing 0.42 dB requires η ≈ 0.61. Including the squared LO–Schmidt overlap (0.88² = 0.774) with η_HD = 0.83 gives η ≈ 0.64 and V_in ≈ 0.40 dB, still not 0.42 dB. The main text does not state whether the LO mode overlap or the reduced 6.67 dB-clearance efficiency is included in η_HD. Because the 0.42 dB value anchors the generated-squeezing claim, the efficiency model in SI VII must be presented explicitly in the main text and the arithmetic reconciled.
  2. [Fig. 3b and Eqs. (2)-(3)] The values γ = 112.5(56) W⁻¹m⁻¹, η_L = 0.52(6), and the 'total generated squeezing level of 0.83(3) dB' are obtained by fitting the same power-dependent data they describe. They are therefore model-dependent extrapolations, not independent measurements. The model assumes a single-mode squeezed state and a mode-matched LO; with Schmidt number K = 34.7 and an LO overlap of 0.88, omission of the mode-overlap factor can bias the fitted η and g. The paper should label 0.83 dB and the 0.26 dB ceiling as 'model-inferred', report the fitted α_TPA used in Eq. (3), and provide a goodness-of-fit metric or an independent validation. This is load-bearing because the Discussion uses 0.83(3) dB as the headline generated squeezing.
  3. [Methods / SI VI] The main text does not specify the electronic-noise subtraction used to normalise the variances to shot noise. At the operating 6.67 dB clearance the electronic noise is ~21% of the total variance at the shot-noise level, so the 0.25 dB effect is only a 5.6% variance reduction. Although a random error in a consistently applied subtraction shifts the ratio by only ~0.01 dB, an inconsistent treatment between the squeezed trace and the shot-noise reference could produce an error comparable to the effect. Please state the subtraction formula and the uncertainty in the noise-floor estimate in the main text so that the direct 0.25 dB claim is fully auditable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3a] The axis label on the variance plot appears corrupted in the preprint rendering ('/uni00000013/...'). Please ensure the axis is correctly labelled, e.g. 'Quadrature variance (dB)'.
  2. [Results, 'The photonic integrated circuit'] The sentence 'maximum shot noise clearance of 8.06 dB ... corresponding to a detection efficiency of 83%' does not explain how the clearance maps to a detection efficiency. A formula or reference should be given.
  3. [Eq. (3)] The experimentally estimated nonlinear-loss coefficient α_TPA = β_TPA/A is said to be used in the fit, but its numerical value is not given in the main text. Please report it for reproducibility.
  4. [Squeezing estimation] The uncertainty in the 0.25(1) dB value is not derived in the main text. State how many independent phase bins or runs contribute to the statistical error.
  5. [Results, 'Generation and control of pump and LO fields'] The quoted LO–Schmidt mode overlap of 0.88 should specify whether it is an amplitude overlap or an intensity overlap, and clarify how it enters the detection-efficiency correction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central 0.25 dB claim is a direct measurement, and the model-derived corrections are clearly labeled inferences rather than independent predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is the direct measurement of 0.25(1) dB of squeezing via an on-chip pulsed homodyne detector. That number is extracted from phase-swept variance data with the phenomenological fit of Eq. 1, not from a model whose parameters are fitted to the same quantity. The derived values (0.42 dB entering the detector, 0.83 dB generated) are back-corrected using Eq. 2 with independently characterized η_HD and with γ and η_L fitted to the same Fig. 3b data. These derived values are therefore model-based re-expressions of the measurement, not independent predictions; however, the paper does not present them as model tests, and the fit is anchored by an independently measured α_TPA and the cited Husko TPA model. The extracted n2 is compared with literature values, providing an external check. Self-citations [20]-[22],[24] appear in contextual statements about integrated homodyne detectors and CV photonics and are not load-bearing for the squeezing result. A separate internal inconsistency exists: combining η_HD=83% with Eq. 2 and the measured 0.25 dB yields about 0.30 dB entering the detector, not 0.42 dB, implying an unstated efficiency or mode-overlap factor; the main text attributes the correction to Supplementary Section VII. That is a reproducibility and consistency concern, not circularity: the 0.25 dB measurement is not derived from the correction. Overall, no load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger is modest: no invented entities, and the central 0.25 dB measurement requires only standard homodyne theory plus a reliable noise-floor calibration. The inferred quantities — 0.42 dB at detector input, 0.83 dB generated, and the 0.26 dB nonlinear-loss ceiling — are all outputs of the two-parameter fit (γ, η_L) plus the independently measured α_TPA, so the reader should treat them as model-extrapolated estimates, not direct observations.

free parameters (3)
  • γ (waveguide nonlinear parameter) = 112.5(56) W⁻¹m⁻¹
    Fitted to the squeezing-versus-pump-power data in Fig 3b via Eqs. 2-3; all inferred squeezing levels (0.42, 0.83 dB) and the 0.26 dB ceiling inherit this fit. n₂ = 6.38(32)×10⁻¹⁸ m²/W is then derived from γ.
  • η_L (linear transmission of the chip) = 0.52(6)
    Second free parameter in the Fig 3b fit; used to convert 'squeezing entering detector' (0.42 dB) into 'generated squeezing' (0.83 dB).
  • α_TPA (two-photon absorption coefficient) = not stated in main text (estimated via SNSPD photon counting, SI Section VII)
    Input to Eq. 3 and to η_XTPA(p). Measured rather than fitted, but still a model input obtained on the same device under test.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption SFWM in the silicon spiral generates squeezed vacuum with the JSI shown in Fig 1c, decomposable into K=34.7 Schmidt modes.
    Standard theory of spontaneous four-wave mixing; the multimode structure determines the 0.88 single-mode LO overlap and the measured single-mode squeezing.
  • domain assumption Nonlinear loss model: g = (γA/β_TPA)·ln(1 + β_TPA p√(P₁P₂)L/A), with η = η_XTPA(p)·η_L·η_HD.
    Taken from ref [47] (Husko et al.); the paper's central efficiency analysis and the 0.26 dB ceiling rest on this functional form.
  • domain assumption Free-carrier absorption is negligible because the ~2 ns carrier lifetime is much shorter than the 10 ns pulse period.
    Stated in Results; if FCA were significant at the operating power, the saturation fit would misattribute loss and bias the inferred generated squeezing.
  • domain assumption Shot noise and electronic noise add linearly, and the noise floor is stationary over the phase ramp.
    Required for the variance normalization that produces the 0.25 dB sub-shot-noise minimum; the procedure is deferred to SI Section VI.
  • domain assumption The local oscillator is shot-noise-limited and its classical noise is uncorrelated with the source field.
    Implicit in treating the measured variance ratio as quadrature squeezing rather than classical cross-correlation; both fields derive from the same mode-locked laser.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generation and detection of squeezed light on a single silicon photonic chip." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FDALKN4D

@misc{pith2026260715461,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generation and detection of squeezed light on a single silicon photonic chip},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FDALKN4D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15461}
}
abstract

The ability to generate and detect quantum states of light on a single integrated photonic device is essential to scale quantum photonics into useful quantum technologies. Integrating the required capabilities into complementary-metal-oxide-semiconductor compatible monolithic chips can reduce cost and unlock new functionality through miniaturisation. In this work we demonstrate a single silicon-on-insulator photonic integrated circuit for the monolithic generation and detection of quantum light on a commercially available platform that operates entirely at room temperature. Specifically, we leverage spontaneous four-wave mixing in silicon waveguides to produce squeezed light which is subsequently detected by photodiodes operating in a pulsed homodyne detector configuration on the same chip as the source. We directly measure $0.25(1)$ dB of squeezing, including contributions from waveguide propagation loss and detection inefficiency, and include a detailed analysis of the impact of nonlinear loss on the squeezing levels achievable using this platform.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15461 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a. The PIC was designed in-house with fabri￾cation performed by IMEC as part of an MPW using their ISiPP50G process with a microscope image shown in Fig. 1b. A 1.1 cm spiral waveguide acts as a source [46], generating squeezed vacuum via degenerate spon￾taneous four-wave mixing (SFWM) from a bichromatic pulsed pump coupled onto the chip via a grating coupler. As a consequence of the broad satisfaction of the phase￾m… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Heterogeneously Integrated Squeezed-Light Generation and Detection on a Single Photonic Chip

    quant-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A single silicon-nitride chip now generates, routes, and detects a 34-mode squeezed quantum microcomb with about 3 dB of raw squeezing.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J. Wang, F. Sciarrino, A. Laing, and M. G. Thompson, Integrated photonic quantum technologies, Nature Pho- tonics14, 273 (2020)

    2020

  2. [2]

    Moody, V

    G. Moody, V. J. Sorger, D. J. Blumenthal, P. W. Juodawlkis, W. Loh, C. Sorace-Agaskar, A. E. Jones, K. C. Balram, J. C. F. Matthews, A. Laing, M. Da- vanco, L. Chang, J. E. Bowers, N. Quack, C. Gal- land, I. Aharonovich, M. A. Wolff, C. Schuck, N. Sin- clair, M. Lonˇ car, T. Komljenovic, D. Weld, S. Mookher- jea, S. Buckley, M. Radulaski, S. Reitzenstein,...

    2022

  3. [3]

    Peruzzo, J

    A. Peruzzo, J. McClean, P. Shadbolt, M.-H. Yung, X.-Q. Zhou, P. J. Love, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and J. L. O’Brien, A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor, Nature Communications5, 4213 (2014)

    2014

  4. [4]

    F. H. B. Somhorst, R. van der Meer, M. Correa Anguita, R. Schadow, H. J. Snijders, M. de Goede, B. Kassen- berg, P. Venderbosch, C. Taballione, J. P. Epping, H. H. van den Vlekkert, J. Timmerhuis, J. F. F. Bulmer, J. Lu- gani, I. A. Walmsley, P. W. H. Pinkse, J. Eisert, N. Walk, and J. J. Renema, Quantum simulation of thermodynam- ics in an integrated qua...

    2023

  5. [5]

    W. Luo, L. Cao, Y. Shi, L. Wan, H. Zhang, S. Li, G. Chen, Y. Li, S. Li, Y. Wang, S. Sun, M. F. Karim, H. Cai, L. C. Kwek, and A. Q. Liu, Recent progress in quantum photonic chips for quantum communication and internet, Light: Science & Applications12, 175 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    Labont´ e, O

    L. Labont´ e, O. Alibart, V. D’Auria, F. Doutre, J. Etesse, G. Sauder, A. Martin, ´E. Picholle, and S. Tanzilli, In- tegrated photonics for quantum communications and metrology, PRX Quantum5, 010101 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Reithmaier, S

    G. Reithmaier, S. Lichtmannecker, T. Reichert, P. Hasch, K. M¨ uller, M. Bichler, R. Gross, and J. J. Finley, On-chip time resolved detection of quantum dot emission using integrated superconducting single photon detectors, Sci- entific Reports3, 1901 (2013)

    1901

  8. [8]

    Alexander, A

    K. Alexander, A. Benyamini, D. Black, D. Bonneau, S. Burgos, B. Burridge, H. Cable, G. Campbell, G. Cata- lano, A. Ceballos, C.-M. Chang, S. S. Choudhury, C. J. Chung, F. Danesh, T. Dauer, M. Davis, E. Dudley, P. Er-Xuan, J. Fargas, A. Farsi, C. Fenrich, J. Frazer, M. Fukami, Y. Ganesan, G. Gibson, M. Gimeno-Segovia, S. Goeldi, P. Goley, R. Haislmaier, S....

    2025

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Kumar, E

    R. Kumar, E. Barrios, A. MacRae, E. Cairns, E. H. Hunt- ington, and A. I. Lvovsky, Versatile wideband balanced detector for quantum optical homodyne tomography, Op- tics Communications285, 5259 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    N. C. Menicucci, P. van Loock, M. Gu, C. Weedbrook, T. C. Ralph, and M. A. Nielsen, Universal Quantum Computation with Continuous-Variable Cluster States, Physical Review Letters97, 110501 (2006)

    2006

  3. [11]

    J. E. Bourassa, R. N. Alexander, M. Vasmer, A. Patil, I. Tzitrin, T. Matsuura, D. Su, B. Q. Baragiola, S. Guha, G. Dauphinais, K. K. Sabapathy, N. C. Menicucci, and I. Dhand, Blueprint for a Scalable Photonic Fault- Tolerant Quantum Computer, Quantum5, 392 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Aghaee Rad, T

    H. Aghaee Rad, T. Ainsworth, R. N. Alexander, B. Al- tieri, M. F. Askarani, R. Baby, L. Banchi, B. Q. Bara- giola, J. E. Bourassa, R. S. Chadwick, I. Charania, H. Chen, M. J. Collins, P. Contu, N. D’Arcy, G. Dauphi- nais, R. De Prins, D. Deschenes, I. Di Luch, S. Duque, P. Edk...

    2025

  5. [13]

    Qin, Y.-H

    J. Qin, Y.-H. Deng, H.-S. Zhong, L.-C. Peng, H. Su, Y.-H. Luo, J.-M. Xu, D. Wu, S.-Q. Gong, H.-L. Liu, H. Wang, M.-C. Chen, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Unconditional and Robust Quantum Metro- logical Advantage beyond N00N States, Physical Review Letters130, 0708...

    2023

  6. [14]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum Metrology, Physical Review Letters96, 010401 (2006)

    2006

  7. [15]

    The LIGO Scientific collaboration, A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit, Nature Physics7, 962 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    The Virgo Collaboration, Increasing the astrophysical reach of the advanced virgo detector via the application of squeezed vacuum states of light, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 231108 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Atkinson, E

    G. Atkinson, E. Allen, G. Ferranti, A. McMillan, and J. Matthews, Quantum Enhanced Precision Estimation of Transmission with Bright Squeezed Light, Physical Re- view Applied16, 044031 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    M. A. Taylor, J. Janousek, V. Daria, J. Knittel, B. Hage, H.-A. Bachor, and W. P. Bowen, Subdiffraction-Limited Quantum Imaging within a Living Cell, Physical Review X4, 011017 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    C. A. Casacio, L. S. Madsen, A. Terrasson, M. Waleed, K. Barnscheidt, B. Hage, M. A. Taylor, and W. P. Bowen, Quantum-enhanced nonlinear microscopy, Nature594, 201 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    R. N. Clark, B. Puzio, O. M. Green, S. T. Pradyumna, O. Trojak, A. Politi, and J. C. F. Matthews, Integrated photonics for continuous-variable quantum optics, Na- ture Photonics20, 489 (2026)

    2026

  13. [21]

    Raffaelli, G

    F. Raffaelli, G. Ferranti, D. H. Mahler, P. Sibson, J. E. Kennard, A. Santamato, G. Sinclair, D. Bonneau, M. G. Thompson, and J. C. F. Matthews, A homodyne detector integrated onto a photonic chip for measuring quantum states and generating random numbers, Quantum Sci- ence an...

    2018

  14. [22]

    J. F. Tasker, J. Frazer, G. Ferranti, E. J. Allen, L. F. Brunel, S. Tanzilli, V. D’Auria, and J. C. F. Matthews, Silicon photonics interfaced with integrated electronics for 9 GHz measurement of squeezed light, Nature Pho- tonics15, 11 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Bruynsteen, M

    C. Bruynsteen, M. Vanhoecke, J. Bauwelinck, and X. Yin, Integrated balanced homodyne pho- tonic–electronic detector for beyond 20 GHz shot-noise- limited measurements, Optica8, 1146 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    J. F. Tasker, J. Frazer, G. Ferranti, and J. C. F. Matthews, A Bi-CMOS electronic photonic integrated circuit quantum light detector, Science Advances10, eadk6890 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    A. Dutt, K. Luke, S. Manipatruni, A. L. Gaeta, P. Nussenzveig, and M. Lipson, On-Chip Optical Squeez- ing, Physical Review Applied3, 044005 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    V. D. Vaidya, B. Morrison, L. G. Helt, R. Shahrokshahi, D. H. Mahler, M. J. Collins, K. Tan, J. Lavoie, A. Re- pingon, M. Menotti, N. Quesada, R. C. Pooser, A. E. Lita, T. Gerrits, S. W. Nam, and Z. Vernon, Broad- band quadrature-squeezed vacuum and nonclassical pho- ton numbe...

    2020

  19. [27]

    Jahanbozorgi, Z

    M. Jahanbozorgi, Z. Yang, S. Sun, H. Chen, R. Liu, B. Wang, and X. Yi, Generation of squeezed quantum microcombs with silicon nitride integrated photonic cir- cuits, Optica10, 1100 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Y. Zhao, Y. Okawachi, J. K. Jang, X. Ji, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, Near-Degenerate Quadrature-Squeezed Vacuum Generation on a Silicon-Nitride Chip, Physical Review Letters124, 193601 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    Zhang, M

    Y. Zhang, M. Menotti, K. Tan, V. D. Vaidya, D. H. Mahler, L. G. Helt, L. Zatti, M. Liscidini, B. Morri- son, and Z. Vernon, Squeezed light from a nanophotonic molecule, Nature Communications12, 2233 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Shen, P.-Y

    Y. Shen, P.-Y. Hsieh, S. K. Sridhar, S. Feldman, Y.- C. Chang, T. A. Smith, and A. Dutt, Strong nanopho- tonic quantum squeezing exceeding 3.5 dB in a foundry- compatible Kerr microresonator, Optica12, 302 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    M. V. Larsen, J. E. Bourassa, S. Kocsis, J. F. Tasker, R. S. Chadwick, C. Gonz´ alez-Arciniegas, J. Hastrup, C. E. Lopetegui-Gonz´ alez, F. M. Miatto, A. Motamedi, R. Noro, G. Roeland, R. Baby, H. Chen, P. Contu, I. Di Luch, C. Drago, M. Giesbrecht, T. Grainge, I. Krasnokutska...

    2025

  24. [32]

    X. Jia, C. You, C. Zhai, X. Zhu, Y. Zheng, T. Dai, Z. Fu, X. Su, Q. Gong, and J. Wang, Monolithic integration of continuous-variable cluster-state generation, manipu- lation and measurement, Nature Photonics , 1 (2026)

    2026

  25. [33]

    A. N. Danilin, T. R. Yunusov, A. P. Dushanin, N. S. Salakhova, A. K. Vorobyev, A. D. Ivanov, A. V. Masa- lov, I. A. Bilenko, and D. A. Chermoshentsev, Squeez- ing of light in a dual-pumped microresonator revealed by a common-pass local oscillator, Phys. Rev. Appl.25, 054021 (2026)

    2026

  26. [34]

    P.-K. Chen, I. Briggs, S. Hou, and L. Fan, Ultra- broadband quadrature squeezing with thin-film lithium niobate nanophotonics, Optics Letters47, 1506 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Peace, A

    D. Peace, A. Zappacosta, R. Cernansky, B. Haylock, A. Boes, A. Mitchell, and M. Lobino, Picosecond pulsed squeezing in thin-film lithium niobate strip-loaded waveg- uides at telecommunication wavelengths, Journal of Physics: Photonics4, 035002 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    H. S. Stokowski, T. P. McKenna, T. Park, A. Y. Hwang, D. J. Dean, O. T. Celik, V. Ansari, M. M. Fejer, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Integrated quantum optical phase sensor in thin film lithium niobate, Nature Communications14, 3355 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    T. Park, H. Stokowski, V. Ansari, S. Gyger, K. K. S. Mul- tani, O. T. Celik, A. Y. Hwang, D. J. Dean, F. Mayor, T. P. McKenna, M. M. Fejer, and A. Safavi-Naeini, Single-mode squeezed-light generation and tomography 9 with an integrated optical parametric oscillator, Science Ad...

    2024

  30. [38]

    T. N. Arge, S. Jo, H. Q. Nguyen, F. Lenzini, J. A. H. Nielsen, W. Pernice, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, T. Gehring, and U. L. Andersen, Demonstration of a Squeezed Light Source on Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Without Peri- odic Poling, inQuantum 2.0 Conference and Exhibition (2024), ...

    2024

  31. [39]

    Gurses, S

    V. Gurses, S. I. Davis, R. Valivarthi, N. Sinclair, M. Spiropulu, and A. Hajimiri, An on-chip phased ar- ray for non-classical light, Nature Communications16, 6849 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    B. Bai, J. Huang, G.-R. Qiao, Y.-Q. Nie, W. Tang, T. Chu, J. Zhang, and J.-W. Pan, 18.8 Gbps real-time quantum random number generator with a photonic inte- grated chip, Applied Physics Letters118, 264001 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Q. Yu, J. Gao, N. Ye, B. Chen, K. Sun, L. Xie, K. Srini- vasan, M. Zervas, G. Navickaite, M. Geiselmann,et al., Heterogeneous photodiodes on silicon nitride waveguides, Optics Express28, 14824 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    J. Gao, B. Wang, F. Tabatabaei, R. Liu, S. Hanifi, X. Guo, S. M. Bowers, X. Yi, and A. Beling, Hetero- geneous integration of a high-speed photodiode with mi- crocavity solitons for on-chip mmwave generation, Optica 12, 465 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    C. Wei, Y. Yu, Z. Wang, L. Jiang, Z. Zeng, J. Ye, X. Zou, W. Pan, X. Xie, and L. Yan, Ultra-wideband waveguide-coupled photodiodes heterogeneously inte- grated on a thin-film lithium niobate platform, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07861 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    C. Wei, X. Xie, C. Wang, J. Sun, L. Jiang, J. Ye, X. Zou, W. Pan, and L. Yan, Ultrahigh-Speed Photodiode on Thin-Film Lithium Niobate Platform, in2024 Interna- tional Topical Meeting on Microwave Photonics (MWP) (2024) pp. 1–4

    2024

  37. [45]

    Paesani, Y

    S. Paesani, Y. Ding, R. Santagati, L. Chakhmakhchyan, C. Vigliar, K. Rottwitt, L. K. Oxenløwe, J. Wang, M. G. Thompson, and A. Laing, Generation and sampling of quantum states of light in a silicon chip, Nature Physics 15, 925 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    J. W. Silverstone, D. Bonneau, K. Ohira, N. Suzuki, H. Yoshida, N. Iizuka, M. Ezaki, C. M. Natarajan, M. G. Tanner, R. H. Hadfield,et al., On-chip quantum inter- ference between silicon photon-pair sources, Nature Pho- tonics8, 104 (2014)

    2014

  39. [47]

    C. A. Husko, A. S. Clark, M. J. Collins, A. De Rossi, S. Combri´ e, G. Lehoucq, I. H. Rey, T. F. Krauss, C. Xiong, and B. J. Eggleton, Multi-photon absorption limits to heralded single photon sources, Scientific reports 3, 3087 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    W. H. P. Pernice, C. Schuck, M. Li, and H. X. Tang, Car- rier and thermal dynamics of silicon photonic resonators at cryogenic temperatures, Opt. Express19, 3290 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    G. F. Sinclair, N. A. Tyler, D. Sahin, J. Barreto, and M. G. Thompson, Temperature Dependence of the Kerr Nonlinearity and Two-Photon Absorption in a Silicon Waveguide at 1.55µm, Physical Review Applied11, 044084 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    L. M. Rosenfeld, D. A. Sulway, G. F. Sinclair, V. Anant, M. G. Thompson, J. G. Rarity, and J. W. Silverstone, Mid-infrared quantum optics in silicon, Optics Express 28, 37092 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.