Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 67 references

Preparation geometry and slow-sector routing in driven Kerr resonators: an operational spectral theory of Liouvillians

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Every resolved Liouvillian mode should be described by a triple: eigenvalue for timing, left eigenoperator for excitation, right eigenoperator for detection and deformation; their product is a gauge-invariant modal weight.

desk verdict Carefully framed operational spectral toolkit for Liouvillian modes; the central factorization is sound, but the routing crossovers in the Kerr application rest on a representative-dependent projection that is never quantified. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05046 v1 pith:FDGI3L7O submitted 2026-08-05 quant-ph

Kilian Seibold This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph MSC 81S2281Q12 PACS 03.65.Yz
keywords LiouvillianspectraltheorymodalweightleftandrighteigenoperatorsdrivenKerrresonatormetastabilityphase-spaceexcitationmapsslow-sectorroutinganomalousrelaxationacceleration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's central claim is that a Liouvillian eigenvalue says how long a mode persists, but not whether a chosen preparation excites it or a chosen observable detects it. For each spectrally resolved mode, the eigenvalue fixes the temporal or frequency dependence, the left eigenoperator determines excitation by an input or source, and the right eigenoperator determines the propagated density deformation and readout overlap; the product of the two overlaps is a gauge-invariant modal weight $w_k$. This separates persistence from protocol visibility: a slow mode may be invisible to a given protocol, and a faster mode can dominate a transient when its weight is larger. In driven Kerr resonators the framework predicts coherent preparations whose excitation vanishes, giving mode-selective suppression and, when the slowest mode is the only gap mode, anomalously fast relaxation; it also separates symmetry-resolved relaxation channels and, under one-photon bias, yields a three-coordinate slow-sector stochastic model with channel-selective routing crossovers. The upshot is that preparation geometry and slow-sector propagation are complementary sources of operational information beyond the eigenvalue spectrum.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the biorthonormal left-right spectral decomposition of the Liouvillian: for each mode the eigenvalue $\lambda_k$ fixes the time or frequency dependence, the left eigenoperator $\ell_k$ fixes excitation by an input or source, the right eigenoperator $r_k$ gives the propagated density deformation and readout overlap, and $w_k = \operatorname{Tr}(O r_k)\,\operatorname{Tr}(\ell_k^\dagger X)$ is the gauge-invariant modal weight. For coherent states, the excitation factor is the phase-space symbol of $\ell_k$ and its zero contour is the mode-suppression manifold, while the right-mode symbol of $r_k$ displays the deformation. For resolved clusters, the Riesz projector and restricted propagator become the stable objects. Slow-sector coordinates are constructed from the extremal geometry of the projected trace-one manifold, and the restricted Liouvillian in the representative basis, $Q = C^{-1} \Lambda C$, becomes a stochastic routing generator when the representatives are positive and the off-diagonal entries are nonnegative.

What would settle it

A direct test in a driven Kerr resonator: prepare a coherent state on the predicted zero contour of the switching-mode excitation map, measure the transient of an observable, and check whether the slow exponential tail at the switching rate is absent. If a tail at that rate persists, the excitation-detection factorization for that mode is wrong; equivalently, independently reconstruct left and right eigenoperators from transient fits and compare the predicted gauge-invariant modal weight with the measured amplitude.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the operational content of a resolved Liouvillian mode is the matched triple $\lambda_k$, $\ell_k$, $r_k$ rather than the eigenvalue alone. After biorthonormalization, the excitation factor $E_k(X)=\operatorname{Tr}(\ell_k^\dagger X)$ and the detection factor $D_k(O)=\operatorname{Tr}(O r_k)$ separately carry the mode gauge, while $w_k = D_k E_k$ is gauge invariant and controls transients, correlation residues, and response spectra. For coherent preparations the excitation factor becomes a phase-space map whose zero set marks preparations that do not excite the mode, and the matched right eigenoperator gives the corresponding signed phase-space deformation. When a slow sector is spectrally resolved but a mode is not isolated, the Riesz projector and restricted propagator replace the single eigenpair; on a slow manifold, reconstructed coordinates and, under positivity and Markov admissibility, a projected stochastic generator describe propagation. In the driven Kerr resonator this structure identifies switching-mode suppression, separates odd lobe-imbalance and even bright-central channels that reorganize differently across the bright-central crossover, and reveals bias-induced crossovers from center-first to opposite-lobe-first routing while the coherent-preparation partition continues to deform.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the retained three-coordinate slow sector, spanned by the stationary state and two continuation-tracked modes with representatives chosen from the extremal geometry of the projected manifold, is complete for the slow dynamics; a different representative set or a larger slow subspace could shift or remove the reported routing crossovers.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Coherent preparations on the zero contour of a resolved mode suppress that mode in the selected protocol; when that mode is the unique slowest mode, the state relaxes anomalously fast rather than at the Liouvillian gap rate.
  • A faster mode can dominate a transient or a frequency window over a slower one whenever its modal weight or residue is larger, so gap ordering alone does not predict relaxation times.
  • Joint fits of coherent-state transients to common poles can reconstruct the excitation map up to one mode-dependent detection scale, and repeating with different readouts fixes relative detection factors without full generator reconstruction.
  • In the biased Kerr-cat regime, the projected three-state generator yields transition rates whose routing log-odds locate channel-selective crossovers between center-first and opposite-lobe-first competition, while the coherent-preparation partition keeps deforming after the branchings have nearly saturated.
  • Near internal degeneracies, the resolved Riesz subspace and its restricted propagator, not individual eigenpairs, are the protocol-relevant objects, so operational predictions remain stable where individual eigenpairs are ill conditioned.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The zero-contour suppression idea carries over to finite-time control: a temporary one-photon bias during a ramp could preferentially address one outer phase-space region before symmetry is restored, a control problem the paper introduces but does not solve.
  • Because modal weights separate excitation from detection, a diagnostic based purely on the Liouvillian gap can be corrected by weighting each sector mode by its excitation-detection product; this is a testable way to reconcile gap-versus-relaxation discrepancies in other dissipative systems.
  • The representative dependence of the projected coordinates suggests that a fully protocol-independent slow-sector description would need to average over representative sets or fix them by independent first-passage data, of which the paper reports only qualitative stability.
  • The same matched left-right structure should transfer to other bosonic or fermionic dissipative platforms, with coherent-state maps replaced by the appropriate phase-space symbols; exact suppression on zero contours would then depend on the preparation family surviving the symbol transform.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops an operational spectral theory of Liouvillians, arguing that each resolved mode should be characterized by the triple (eigenvalue, left eigenoperator, right eigenoperator) rather than by the eigenvalue alone. The left eigenoperator determines excitation by an input or source, the right eigenoperator gives the propagated density deformation and readout overlap, and their product defines a gauge-invariant modal weight (Eq. 8). The framework is applied to driven Kerr resonators in three regimes: linear drive yields a switching mode with coherent-state excitation maps whose zero contours suppress the mode; parametric drive separates odd and even symmetry-resolved slow channels; and one-photon bias mixes these channels into a three-coordinate slow sector, from which a projected stochastic generator is reconstructed. The paper reports channel-selective routing crossovers in the biased case and shows that the coherent-preparation partition continues to deform after routing saturates. The conclusions are carefully hedged: the authors explicitly state that the routing crossovers are properties of the projection and that representative choices affect the reduced coordinates.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a useful operational vocabulary for open quantum systems, separating spectral persistence from protocol-dependent visibility and giving phase-space tools for mode-selective preparation. The modal-weight factorization in Eqs. (7)-(10) is definitionally sound and gauge invariant under reciprocal eigenoperator rescaling, and the paper is unusually explicit about the conditions under which the reduced slow-sector generator admits a stochastic interpretation. The applications to driven Kerr resonators illustrate the framework concretely and identify falsifiable statements about coherent-state preparations, such as the zero contours of excitation maps. The main limitation, which the authors themselves flag in App. A3, is that the quantitative routing diagnostics in Fig. 5 depend on the representative selection and on the retained three-dimensional slow subspace; the paper does not currently quantify how robust those diagnostics are. This is a correctness-risk concern for the application section rather than a flaw in the core spectral theory, which appears mathematically sound.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IIID, Fig. 5, App. A3] The routing crossovers in Fig. 5, defined by the zero crossings of R_+ and R_- in Eq. (72), are computed from the projected generator Q = C^{-1} L_slow C, where the representatives {sigma_c, sigma_+, sigma_-} are selected as extremal points of the sampled slow manifold (App. A3). The paper repeatedly states that the coordinates, generator, and Fig. 6 partition are representative dependent, but it does not quantify how the crossover locations or the sharp feature in Xi_sw change under admissible variations of the representative set or under enlargement of the retained slow subspace. This is load-bearing for the central claim of bias-induced channel-selective routing, because a different representative choice or an additional slow mode could shift or erase the claimed crossovers. The authors should provide a stability analysis: perturb the representative construction, include a third nonstationary mode in the slow sector, and report the resulting changes in R_+, R_-, and Xi_sw.
  2. [Sec. IIIC, App. A2, App. A4] The numerical results are presented without quantitative convergence data. The paper states that the reported stationary states, retained spectral data, and phase-space maps are 'stable under enlargement of the numerical Hilbert space' (Sec. IIIA), but no truncation dimension, solver tolerance, or residual values are reported. The residual definitions in Eqs. (A14)-(A15) and the admissibility checks in Eqs. (A33)-(A34) are described, yet no actual numbers or convergence plots are provided. Without these, the reader cannot assess whether the zero contours in Fig. 4 and the routing rates in Fig. 5 are converged with respect to Hilbert-space truncation. Please report the Fock-space dimension used, the numerical tolerances, and a representative convergence scan (e.g., eigenvalue and excitation-map values versus truncation size).
  3. [Sec. IIB] The reconstruction protocol for excitation maps is described as a direct consequence of the modal-weight factorization, but it is not demonstrated on data. The protocol in Eqs. (27)-(29) requires joint fitting of transients to common poles and then separating excitation maps from detection factors; this involves nontrivial numerical fitting and error propagation. Since the paper does not claim experimental implementation, this is not a fatal gap, but the manuscript should state more clearly whether the protocol is a proposal or a demonstrated reconstruction. If it is a central contribution, a numerical demonstration on synthetic data with known modes would strengthen the claim; otherwise it should be moved to the outlook section as a future step.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (44)] The parity covariance in Eq. (44) is written as Z_2(ρ) = Π ρ Π^†, which is clear, but the subsequent text uses 'Z2' both as a superoperator and as a label for the symmetry group. Please use a consistent notation, e.g., calligraphic script for the superoperator.
  2. [Sec. II, paragraph after Eq. (6)] There is a typographical error in the full text: 'anoperational spectral theory' should read 'an operational spectral theory'. Please correct this and scan for similar spacing issues.
  3. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption contains the placeholder text '□10□1 □10□6' in the axis labels, which appears to be a rendering artifact. The intended values ('10^{-1}' and '10^{-6}' on the logarithmic decay-rate axis) should be inserted.
  4. [Eq. (67) and surrounding text] The definition of chi_e in Eq. (67) uses absolute values that are then dropped in the final equality assuming nonnegative rates. The text should state explicitly that the absolute values are redundant under the nonnegativity assumption, or define chi_e without absolute values and then state the nonnegativity condition separately.
  5. [Sec. IIID, Eq. (81)] The quantity A_amb(alpha) is called an 'ambiguity' measure, but its interpretation as a 'top-two margin complement' is only clear after reading the definition. Please add a sentence explaining that it is large when the two leading coordinates are nearly equal, and that it is not a physical probability or a distance.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the modal-weight factorization is a direct biorthonormal expansion, the projected routing generator is derived from the retained Liouvillian subspace, and the projection-dependence of the routing crossovers is explicitly disclosed.

full rationale

The central factorization in Eqs. (7)-(10) is an algebraic consequence of the biorthonormal eigenoperator expansion in Eq. (3) and Eq. (9): the transient deviation is delta<O>_t = sum_k e^{lambda_k t} Tr(O r_k) Tr(ell^dagger_k rho_in), so the modal weight w_k = D_k E_k is defined, not fitted, and its gauge invariance follows from Eq. (6) by construction. The reconstruction protocol in Sec. IIB fits transient amplitudes to recover E_k up to a scale, but it is presented as a measurement scheme, not as a prediction from fitted parameters. The projected routing generator Q = C^{-1} L_slow C in App. A3 is derived exactly from the retained Liouvillian subspace: the paper states 'Q is derived from the retained Liouvillian subspace rather than fitted phenomenologically.' The paper also repeatedly disclaims that the routing crossovers are representation-dependent properties: 'These crossings are properties of the projected representation. They are not automatically topological boundaries of the semiclassical flow', and Fig. 6 admits 'The map is mode-gauge invariant for fixed representatives but remains representative dependent.' These disclosures remove any concealed circular reduction. Self-citations ([9], [43], [58]) are contextual references to related Kerr work and do not ground the biorthonormal factorization or the projected-sector construction. The only caveat is a robustness gap in how the Fig. 5 crossovers shift under admissible representative choices, which the paper itself flags in App. A3 as representative dependence; this is an acknowledged limitation, not a circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; all model inputs are fixed. The central construction rests on the stated assumptions: unique stationary state, truncation fidelity, and positivity and Markov admissibility of the projected slow representation. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Unique stationary state: dim ker(L) = 1 (Eq. 2)
    The entire modal expansion and projected slow-sector construction assumes a single steady state; the paper explicitly states this as the operative assumption.
  • domain assumption Finite-dimensional Liouville-space truncation is faithful
    Numerical spectra and maps are computed in a truncated Fock basis; the paper asserts stability under enlargement without giving quantitative convergence data.
  • domain assumption Positivity and Markov admissibility of the reconstructed slow representation
    A stochastic interpretation of Q requires nonnegative representatives, nonnegative coordinates on the sampled manifold, and nonnegative off-diagonal Q entries; these are verified only within numerical tolerance in App. A4.
  • ad hoc to paper Representative selection via extremal geometry yields physically meaningful slow coordinates
    The states sigma_c, sigma_+, sigma_- are chosen as affinely independent extremal points of the projected cloud following PCCA+ (App. A3); Q and A_amb are representative dependent.
  • standard math Quantum regression theorem for two-time correlations
    Used to express stationary correlations through e^{Lt} (Eq. 13); standard for Markovian quantum dynamical semigroups.
  • standard math Biorthonormal spectral decomposition of a diagonalizable Liouvillian
    Basis of Section II; off-diagonalizable sectors are treated through Riesz subspaces, and the paper retains this resolution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Preparation geometry and slow-sector routing in driven Kerr resonators: an operational spectral theory of Liouvillians." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FDGI3L7O

@misc{pith2026260805046,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Preparation geometry and slow-sector routing in driven Kerr resonators: an operational spectral theory of Liouvillians},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FDGI3L7O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05046}
}
read the original abstract

Liouvillian eigenvalues determine decay rates and oscillation frequencies, but not how the corresponding modes are excited, propagated, and detected in a chosen protocol. We develop an operational spectral theory based on matched left and right eigenoperators. Left eigenoperators determine excitation by an input or source; right eigenoperators determine the propagated density deformation and readout overlap; their product is a gauge-invariant modal weight. For bosonic systems, coherent preparations turn left eigenoperators into phase-space excitation maps whose zeros identify mode-selective suppression, while right eigenoperators yield the corresponding Wigner deformations. Resolved slow subspaces define operational coordinates and, when positivity and Markov-admissibility hold, a projected routing generator. In driven Kerr resonators, the framework identifies preparations that suppress a switching mode, separates symmetry-resolved relaxation channels, and reveals bias-induced crossovers in projected multichannel routing while the coherent-preparation partition continues to deform. Preparation geometry and slow-sector propagation thus provide complementary operational information beyond Liouvillian eigenvalues alone.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05046 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. summarizes the spectral, phase-space, and exci￾tation–detection anatomy of a resolved Liouvillian mode. The two factors depend separately on the mode gauge, whereas their product does not. For a transient, Xˆ = ˆρin. For a stationary correlation or response, Xˆ = B(ˆρss) is the source generated by a superoperator B. For a diagonalizable Liouvillian, the state evolves as ρˆ(t) = ˆρss + X k>0 e λktEk(ˆρin) ˆrk . (9) … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. central region that competes with the two outer lobes. We analyze ∆/Ue = 1.5, 1.8, and 2.2, chosen before, within, and after this crossover [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: shows that the coherent-preparation parti￾tion deforms over the same bias range as the routing crossovers. At zero bias, central and outer low-ambiguity regions are separated by inversion-related ridges. Posi￾tive bias shears these ridges and makes the two outer region…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Phase-space symbols and mode gauges For a single bosonic mode, let ˆD(α) = exp αˆa† −α ∗ˆa , ˆΠ = exp iπˆa†ˆa .(A1) We use the Wigner transform W ˆA;α = 2 π Tr h ˆD†(α) ˆA ˆD(α) ˆΠ i ,(A2) and define the phase-space coordinates α(X, P) =X+iP√ 2 ,W ˆA;X, P ≡ W ˆA;α(X, P) . (A3) With this convention, Z d2αW ˆA;α = Tr ˆA .(A4) The stationary Wigner function ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Spectral diagnostics, symmetry purification, and mode tracking For every retained eigenpair, we evaluate the normal- ized right and left residuals εR k = ∥Lˆrk −λ k ˆrk∥HS ∥L∥HS→HS ∥ˆrk∥HS , εL k = L† ˆℓk −λ ∗ k ˆℓk HS ∥L∥HS→HS ˆℓk HS . (A14) We also evaluate the biorthogonality defect on the re- tained subspace, εbio = V† LVR −I 2 ,(A15) where the column...

    work page

  3. [3]

    We choose this sector to be closed under Hermitian conjugation

    Construction of reduced slow coordinates LetS slow denote the retained slow sector, including the stationary mode. We choose this sector to be closed under Hermitian conjugation. Let n ˆrµ, ˆℓµ o µ∈Sslow (A19) be a matched biorthonormal basis with ˆrss = ˆρss , ˆℓss = ˆI .(A20) For the three-coordinate reductions used in Secs. IIIC and IIID, the physical ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    First, a representativeˆσi is a physical state only if it is Hermi- tian, trace one, and positive semidefinite

    Positivity, stochastic admissibility, and robustness The reduced representation must satisfy three distinct requirements, corresponding to the positivity and clas- sicality conditions of metastable reductions [5]. First, a representativeˆσi is a physical state only if it is Hermi- tian, trace one, and positive semidefinite. Second, the dual coordinates de...

    work page

  5. [5]

    For the Kerr model of Sec

    Perturbation of a resolved spectral sector Let Lϵ =L+ϵ δL,|ϵ| ≪1.(B1) The superoperatorδLdefines a tangent direction in gen- erator space. For the Kerr model of Sec. IIIA, infinitesi- mal variations of the detuning, coherent drive, and one- photon loss rate give δL∆(ˆρ) =i δ∆ ˆa†ˆa,ˆρ , δLF (ˆρ) =−i δFˆa† +δF ∗ˆa,ˆρ , δLκ(ˆρ) =δκD(ˆa) ˆρ . (B2) Theperturb...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Its excitation overlap with a nonstationary mode is Ik ≡E k ˆXδL = Tr h ˆℓ† kδL(ˆρss) i , k >0.(B12) ThematrixMandtheinjectionfactorsI k describediffer- ent effects

    Stationary-state injection and readout response The perturbation also acts on the unperturbed station- ary state and generates the source ˆXδL =δL(ˆρss),Tr ˆXδL = 0.(B11) The second relation follows for a trace-preserving pertur- bation. Its excitation overlap with a nonstationary mode is Ik ≡E k ˆXδL = Tr h ˆℓ† kδL(ˆρss) i , k >0.(B12) ThematrixMandthein...

    work page

  7. [7]

    IIIC and IIID

    Reduced-coordinate response, parity selection rules, and physical admissibility The same construction applies to the reconstructed slow coordinates of Secs. IIIC and IIID. If the repre- sentative matrixCis held fixed, the first-order change of the reduced generator is δQ=C −1MC ,(B18) whereMis evaluated on the full retained modal sub- space, including the...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Minganti, A

    F. Minganti, A. Biella, N. Bartolo and C. Ciuti,Spectral theory of Liouvillians for dissipative phase transitions, Physical Review A98, 042118 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Macieszczak, M

    K. Macieszczak, M. Guţă, I. Lesanovsky and J. P. Gar- rahan,Towards a Theory of Metastability in Open Quan- tum Dynamics, Physical Review Letters116, 240404 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    D. C. Rose, K. Macieszczak, I. Lesanovsky and J. P. Garrahan,Metastability in an open quantum Ising model, Physical Review E94, 052132 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    Casteels, R

    W. Casteels, R. Fazio and C. Ciuti,Critical dynami- cal properties of a first-order dissipative phase transition, Physical Review A95, 012128 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Macieszczak, D

    K. Macieszczak, D. C. Rose, I. Lesanovsky and J. P. Gar- rahan,Theory of classical metastability in open quantum systems, Physical Review Research3, 033047 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    C. A. Brown, K. Macieszczak and R. L. Jack,Unraveling metastable Markovian open quantum systems, Physical Review A109, 022244 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    H. Schomerus,Nonreciprocal response theory of non- Hermitian mechanical metamaterials: Response phase transition from the skin effect of zero modes, Physical Review Research2, 013058 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Scarlatella, A

    O. Scarlatella, A. A. Clerk and M. Schiro,Spectral func- tions and negative density of states of a driven-dissipative nonlinear quantum resonator,NewJournalofPhysics21, 043040 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Seibold, G

    K. Seibold, G. Villa, J. del Pino and O. Zilberberg, Manifestations of flow topology in a quantum driven- dissipative system, Physical Review Research8, 023093 (2026)

    2026

  9. [17]

    Mori and T

    T. Mori and T. Shirai,Resolving a Discrepancy between Liouvillian Gap and Relaxation Time in Boundary- Dissipated Quantum Many-Body Systems, Physical Re- view Letters125, 230604 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    Mori and T

    T. Mori and T. Shirai,Symmetrized Liouvillian Gap in Markovian Open Quantum Systems, Physical Review Letters130, 230404 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Shirai and T

    T. Shirai and T. Mori,Accelerated Decay due to Operator Spreading in Bulk-Dissipated Quantum Systems, Physical Review Letters133, 040201 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Carollo, A

    F. Carollo, A. Lasanta and I. Lesanovsky,Exponentially Accelerated Approach to Stationarity in Markovian Open Quantum Systems through the Mpemba Effect, Physical Review Letters127, 060401 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Briegel and B.-G

    H.-J. Briegel and B.-G. Englert,Quantum optical master equations: The use of damping bases, Physical Review A 47, 3311 (1993)

    1993

  14. [22]

    S. M. Barnett and S. Stenholm,Spectral decomposition of the Lindblad operator, Journal of Modern Optics47, 2869 (2000)

    2000

  15. [23]

    Honda, H

    D. Honda, H. Nakazato and M. Yoshida,Spectral resolu- tion of the Liouvillian of the Lindblad master equation for a harmonic oscillator, Journal of Mathematical Physics 51, 072107 (2010)

    2010

  16. [24]

    J. M. Torres,Closed-form solution of Lindblad master equations without gain, Physical Review A89, 052133 (2014)

    2014

  17. [25]

    Prosen and T

    T. Prosen and T. H. Seligman,Quantization over boson operator spaces, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical43, 392004 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    A. V. Thomas, F. Fritzsch, M. Haque and S. Dutta,Ex- tracting the physical content of Liouvillian eigenmodes: Semiclassical quantization, arXiv:2606.20271 [quant-ph]. 18

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Spohn,An algebraic condition for the approach to equilibrium of an open N-level system, Letters in Mathe- matical Physics2, 33 (1977)

    H. Spohn,An algebraic condition for the approach to equilibrium of an open N-level system, Letters in Mathe- matical Physics2, 33 (1977)

    1977

  20. [28]

    D. E. Evans,Irreducible quantum dynamical semi- groups, Communications in Mathematical Physics54, 293 (1977)

    1977

  21. [29]

    Frigerio,Stationary states of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 63, 269 (1978)

    A. Frigerio,Stationary states of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 63, 269 (1978)

    1978

  22. [30]

    V. V. Albert and L. Jiang,Symmetries and conserved quantities in Lindblad master equations, Physical Review A89, 022118 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    Lax,Formal Theory of Quantum Fluctuations from a Driven State, Physical Review129, 2342 (1963)

    M. Lax,Formal Theory of Quantum Fluctuations from a Driven State, Physical Review129, 2342 (1963)

    1963

  24. [32]

    Gardiner and P

    C. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics(Springer Science & Business Media, 2004)

    2004

  25. [33]

    Campos Venuti and P

    L. Campos Venuti and P. Zanardi,Dynamical response theory for driven-dissipative quantum systems, Physical Review A93, 032101 (2016)

    2016

  26. [34]

    K. E. Cahill and R. J. Glauber,Density Operators and Quasiprobability Distributions, Physical Review177, 1882 (1969)

    1969

  27. [35]

    Hillery, R

    M. Hillery, R. F. O’Connell, M. O. Scully and E. P. Wigner,Distribution functions in physics: Fundamen- tals, Physics Reports106, 121 (1984)

    1984

  28. [36]

    Lu and O

    Z. Lu and O. Raz,Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of the Markovian Mpemba effect and its inverse, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114, 5083 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    T.Kato,Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators,Clas- sics in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995) reprint of the 1980 edition

    1995

  30. [38]

    Minganti, A

    F. Minganti, A. Miranowicz, R. W. Chhajlany and F. Nori,Quantum exceptional points of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and Liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps, Physical Review A100, 062131 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    S. Pan, G. Blasi and G. Haack,Steady-State Noise Signatures of Lindbladian Exceptional Points, arXiv:2606.13377 [quant-ph]

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Beato and G

    N. Beato and G. Teza,Relaxation Control of Open Quantum Systems, Physical Review Letters136, 070401 (2026)

    2026

  33. [41]

    Petermann,Calculated spontaneous emission fac- tor for double-heterostructure injection lasers with gain- induced waveguiding, IEEE Journal of Quantum Elec- tronics15, 566 (1979)

    K. Petermann,Calculated spontaneous emission fac- tor for double-heterostructure injection lasers with gain- induced waveguiding, IEEE Journal of Quantum Elec- tronics15, 566 (1979)

    1979

  34. [42]

    L. N. Trefethen and M. Embree,Spectra and Pseudospec- tra(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2005)

    2005

  35. [43]

    Wiersig,Petermann factors and phase rigidities near exceptional points, Physical Review Research5, 033042 (2023)

    J. Wiersig,Petermann factors and phase rigidities near exceptional points, Physical Review Research5, 033042 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    P. D. Drummond and D. F. Walls,Quantum theory of op- tical bistability. I. Nonlinear polarisability model, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General13, 725 (1980)

    1980

  37. [45]

    Bartolo, F

    N. Bartolo, F. Minganti, W. Casteels and C. Ciuti,Exact steady state of a Kerr resonator with one- and two-photon driving and dissipation: Controllable Wigner-function multimodality and dissipative phase transitions, Physical Review A94, 033841 (2016)

    2016

  38. [46]

    Minganti, V

    F. Minganti, V. Savona and A. Biella,Dissipative phase transitions in n-photon driven quantum nonlinear res- onators, Quantum7, 1170 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Gravina, F

    L. Gravina, F. Minganti and V. Savona,Critical Schrödinger Cat Qubit, PRX Quantum4, 020337 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Beaulieu, F

    G. Beaulieu, F. Minganti, S. Frasca, V. Savona, S. Fe- licetti, R. Di Candia and P. Scarlino,Observation of first- and second-order dissipative phase transitions in a two- photon driven Kerr resonator, Nature Communications 16, 1954 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    Roberts and A

    D. Roberts and A. A. Clerk,Driven-Dissipative Quantum Kerr Resonators: New Exact Solutions, Photon Blockade and Quantum Bistability, Physical Review X10, 021022 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Nowoczyn, L

    C. Nowoczyn, L. Mathey and K. Seibold,Universal quantum melting of quasiperiodic attractors in driven- dissipative cavities, Physical Review A113, 052208 (2026)

    2026

  43. [51]

    Buča and T

    B. Buča and T. Prosen,A note on symmetry reductions of the Lindblad equation: transport in constrained open spin chains, New Journal of Physics14, 073007 (2012)

    2012

  44. [52]

    S. Puri, L. St-Jean, J. A. Gross, A. Grimm, N. E. Frat- tini, P. S. Iyer, A. Krishna, S. Touzard, L. Jiang, A. Blais, S. T. Flammia and S. M. Girvin,Bias-preserving gates with stabilized cat qubits, Science Advances6, eaay5901 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    Grimm, N

    A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar and M. H. Devoret,Stabilization and operation of a Kerr-cat qubit, Nature584, 205 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    Vogel and H

    K. Vogel and H. Risken,Quasiprobability distributions in dispersive optical bistability, Physical Review A39, 4675 (1989)

    1989

  47. [55]

    Kheruntsyan,Wigner function for a driven anhar- monic oscillator, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics1, 225 (1999)

    K. Kheruntsyan,Wigner function for a driven anhar- monic oscillator, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics1, 225 (1999)

    1999

  48. [56]

    Carde, R

    L. Carde, R. Gautier, N. Didier, A. Petrescu, J. Cohen and A. McDonald,Nonperturbative Switching Rates in Bistable Open Quantum Systems: From Driven Kerr Os- cillators to Dissipative Cat Qubits, Physical Review Let- ters136, 100402 (2026)

    2026

  49. [57]

    Zhang, G

    J. Zhang, G. Xia, C.-W. Wu, T. Chen, Q. Zhang, Y. Xie, W.-B. Su, W. Wu, C.-W. Qiu, P.-X. Chen, W. Li, H. Jing and Y.-L. Zhou,Observation of quantum strong Mpemba effect, Nature Communications16, 301 (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    W. E and E. Vanden-Eijnden,Transition-Path The- ory and Path-Finding Algorithms for the Study of Rare Events, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry61, 391 (2010)

    2010

  51. [59]

    D. Ruiz, R. Gautier, J. Guillaud and M. Mirrahimi, Two-photon driven Kerr quantum oscillator with multi- ple spectral degeneracies, Physical Review A107, 042407 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    N. E. Frattini, R. G. Cortiñas, J. Venkatraman, X. Xiao, Q. Su, C. U. Lei, B. J. Chapman, V. R. Joshi, S. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, S. Puri and M. H. Devoret,Observation of Pairwise Level Degeneracies and the Quantum Regime of the Arrhenius Law in a Double-Well Parametric Os- ...

    2024

  53. [61]

    Thompson, D

    F. Thompson, D. K. J. Boneß, M. Dykman and A. Kamenev,Spectroscopy of quantum phase slips: Vi- sualizing complex real-time instantons, Physical Review A113, 043712 (2026)

    2026

  54. [62]

    Suzuki, S

    Y. Suzuki, S. Kawabata, T. Yamamoto and S. Masuda, Quantum State Tomography for Kerr Parametric Oscil- lators, Physical Review Applied20, 034031 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    Deuflhard and M

    P. Deuflhard and M. Weber,Robust Perron cluster anal- ysis in conformation dynamics, Linear Algebra and its 19 Applications398, 161 (2005)

    2005

  56. [64]

    Röblitz and M

    S. Röblitz and M. Weber,Fuzzy spectral clustering by PCCA+: application to Markov state models and data classification, Advances in Data Analysis and Classifica- tion7, 147 (2013)

    2013

  57. [65]

    Nowoczyn, L

    C. Nowoczyn, L. Mathey and K. Seibold,Phase- resolved multichannel quantum escape between limit cy- cles, arXiv:2605.24122 [quant-ph]

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    D. C. Rose, K. Macieszczak, I. Lesanovsky and J. P. Garrahan,Hierarchical classical metastability in an open quantum East model, Physical Review E105, 044121 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    D. K. J. Boneß, W. Belzig and M. I. Dykman,Zero- temperature phase-flip rate in a biased parametric oscil- lator, Physical Review Research7, 023188 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.