Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Ranger21: a synergistic deep learning optimizer

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.13731 v2 pith:FDJMMTQH submitted 2021-06-25 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords optimizeradamwalgorithmsimprovementsinitialoptimizersranger21training
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As optimizers are critical to the performances of neural networks, every year a large number of papers innovating on the subject are published. However, while most of these publications provide incremental improvements to existing algorithms, they tend to be presented as new optimizers rather than composable algorithms. Thus, many worthwhile improvements are rarely seen out of their initial publication. Taking advantage of this untapped potential, we introduce Ranger21, a new optimizer which combines AdamW with eight components, carefully selected after reviewing and testing ideas from the literature. We found that the resulting optimizer provides significantly improved validation accuracy and training speed, smoother training curves, and is even able to train a ResNet50 on ImageNet2012 without Batch Normalization layers. A problem on which AdamW stays systematically stuck in a bad initial state.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. OmniOpt: Taxonomy, Geometry, and Benchmarking of Modern Optimizers

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A meta-pipeline plus LMO four-axis view yields a dual taxonomy of 108 optimizers, and a multi-objective LLM/vision benchmark shows no single family dominates the quality–cost–memory frontier.

  2. Pre-Training LLMs on a budget: A comparison of three optimizers

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In budget-constrained 2.7B-parameter LLM pre-training, Lion is fastest, Sophia reaches the lowest loss, but AdamW wins on downstream benchmarks.

Pith tools