Measurement Incompatibility Based In-equivalence Between Bell and Network Nonlocality

Biswajit Paul; Kaushiki Mukherjee

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 37 references

Measurement Incompatibility Based In-equivalence Between Bell and Network Nonlocality

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that, for every finite $n>2$, any standard linear $n$-local network can generate non-$n$-local correlations even when every party uses compatible measurements, unlike the Bell scenario where incompatible measurements are ne

desk verdict If the existence proofs are correct, this is a real correction to the network-nonlocality resource picture, but the corrupted full text leaves the universal n>2 construction unverified. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.10670 v1 pith:FER7NXFH submitted 2025-08-14 quant-ph

Kaushiki Mukherjee , Biswajit Paul This is my paper

classification quant-ph MSC 81P1581P40 PACS 03.65.Ud03.67.Mn

keywords networknonlocalityn-localitymeasurementincompatibilityjointmeasurabilityBellquantumnetworkslinearstartopology

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Bell nonlocality requires incompatible measurements, but this paper argues that the same is not true for quantum networks with several independent sources. It claims that in any standard linear $n$-local network with $n>2$, there are quantum correlations that violate the relevant $n$-locality inequality even when every party's measurements are compatible (jointly measurable). It also claims the effect is topology-specific: in non-linear networks with star topology, at least one party must use incompatible measurements, and in non-standard networks with independent nonlocal sources, genuine non-$n$-local correlations demand incompatible measurements at every party. Finally, it reports that giving every party incompatible measurements is not by itself enough to detect non-$n$-locality. If these claims hold, the resource theory of measurement incompatibility is not universal: the network's causal structure can replace or alter the amount of measurement incompatibility needed.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are (i) the standard linear $n$-local network, a chain of $n$ independent sources distributed to $n+1$ parties so that the two end parties each receive one source and each middle party receives two; (ii) $n$-locality inequalities, the witnesses whose violation certifies that a correlation is not $n$-local; and (iii) measurement compatibility, meaning that each party's several measurements are jointly measurable, i.e. could be obtained as marginals of a single measurement. The paper uses explicit state-and-measurement constructions to couple these three objects: the states supply the entangled correlations, the compatible measurements satisfy the paper's resource cons

What would settle it

Take the smallest open case, $n=3$: a four-party linear chain fed by three independent sources. Enumerate (or solve by semidefinite relaxation) all tripartite source states and all assignments of jointly measurable local measurements at the four parties, and maximize the paper's $3$-locality inequality. If the maximum equals the local bound, the claim is false; if a violation appears, the construction is confirmed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is an inequivalence between Bell scenarios and quantum network scenarios. In a standard Bell test a single source distributes systems to parties, and producing Bell-nonlocal correlations forces at least one party's measurements to be incompatible. In a standard linear $n$-local network—$n$ independent sources arranged in a chain, shared by $n+1$ parties—the authors construct, for every finite $n>2$, correlations that cannot be reproduced by any $n$-local hidden-variable model, while every party's local measurements are compatible. The violation is certified by an $n$-locality inequality. The resource requirement changes with topology: in a star network one party mus

Load-bearing premise

The central claim collapses unless, for every finite $n>2$, there is an explicit quantum state and a set of jointly measurable local measurements in every standard linear $n$-local network that violate the paper's $n$-locality inequality; a construction that works only for special networks or only for a weaker notion of non-$n$-locality would not support the universal statement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In linear networks, a violation of an $n$-locality inequality does not certify that anyone measured incompatibly; the network structure itself can do the work.
Resource requirements for network nonlocality are topology-dependent: star topology preserves a role for incompatible measurements while linear topology does not.
For genuinely non-$n$-local correlations in networks with independent nonlocal sources, every party must measure incompatibly, so stronger network correlations carry a higher measurement-resource cost.
Since full incompatibility is not sufficient, practical attempts to detect network nonlocality must check the actual network topology and the form of the witness, not just whether measurements are incompatible.
The Bell-scenario slogan that incompatibility is needed for nonlocality must be qualified: it holds for a single source, and fails for chains of more than two independent sources.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural next step, not addressed in the available text, is to test how robust the all-compatible construction is to noise; if it tolerates realistic noise, linear networks become a promising platform for network-nonlocality demonstrations without incompatible measurements.
The topology dependence suggests a research question: for which network graphs does all-compatible violation persist? Star and non-standard networks are already separated, but other graph families are not classified.
One could quantify the minimal amount of incompatibility needed in a star network—for example, the noise tolerance of joint measurability—and connect it to quantitative measures of measurement incompatibility.
The results also hint that the network's causal structure may serve as an alternative resource that can be traded against measurement incompatibility, an activation-like effect for network nonlocality.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

Quick take on arXiv:2508.10670. The abstract makes a sharp, specific claim: in standard linear networks, for any n>2, non n-local correlations can be generated with all parties using compatible measurements, so measurement incompatibility is not necessary — in contrast to the Bell scenario. It also claims a single incompatible party can suffice, star topology requires at least one, and all-incompatible is necessary in non-standard networks for genuine non n-locality. If those existence proofs hold, this corrects the resource picture in a way people in the subfield will care about. The abstract is clearly written and the claims are falsifiable; no parameter-fitting is visible.

The problem: the full text we have is mostly corrupted. I can see fragments but no equations, no state constructions, no network inequalities. I cannot verify the central existential claim. The stress-test note is right to focus on the universal "any standard linear n-local network" claim: the proof must supply a family of states and POVMs for every n>2, show each party's measurements are compatible under the paper's own definition, and show a bona fide n-locality inequality is violated. If the construction only works for n=3 or for a narrow witness, the universal claim collapses. The abstract gives no hint of the construction, so this is load-bearing and currently unchecked.

I also cannot fully check the definitions of "genuine non n-local" or "compatible measurements" from the abstract. The circularity concern seems minor from what I can see — the claims are not obviously derived from their own conclusions — but without the body I can't rule it out.

On balance: this deserves a serious referee if the actual PDF is legible (the corruption may be an extraction artifact). The abstract alone is not enough to accept, but it is enough to justify a full read by someone in network nonlocality. I would not cite it until I see the constructions. Send it to review, but ask the authors to ensure the source is readable and that the universal construction is explicit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to establish a fundamental contrast between Bell-type nonlocality and network nonlocality with respect to measurement incompatibility. According to the abstract, non-n-local correlations can be detected in a standard linear n-local quantum network even when only one party uses incompatible measurements; more strongly, for every finite n > 2, non-n-local correlations can be generated in any standard linear n-local network when all parties perform compatible measurements. The abstract further claims that this behavior is topology-specific: in a non-linear star network at least one party must measure incompatibly, whereas in non-standard networks (all sources independent and nonlocal) all parties must use incompatible measurements to produce genuine non-n-local correlations. Finally, the authors state that supplying incompatible measurements to all parties is not sufficient for non-n-locality detection in any quantum network. The version supplied for review contains a substantially corrupted, unreadable main text, so only the abstract and isolated equation fragments could be assessed.

Significance. If the central theorem is correct, the paper would make a significant conceptual contribution: it would show that in the Bell scenario measurement incompatibility is necessary for nonlocality, but in standard linear networks it is not, thereby sharpening the resource-theoretic distinction between single-source and multi-source quantum correlations. The universal statement 'for any finite n > 2' and the claimed topology dependence are precise, falsifiable, and well suited to the readership of a quantum-information journal. That said, the significance can only be conditional at this stage: the supplied manuscript does not provide a verifiable construction, proof, or numerical witness. There is no machine-checked proof or reproducible code in the available material, and the central existence claim cannot be checked from the abstract alone.

major comments (4)

[Abstract / central theorem] The core claim — that for every finite n > 2 and every standard linear n-local network there exist independent source states and compatible POVMs at every party such that the correlations violate an n-locality inequality — is an existential statement that requires an explicit parameterized construction. The supplied text contains no readable construction: the equations in the body are mostly undecipherable, and the abstract only states that the authors 'demonstrate' the result. This is load-bearing: without an explicit state-POVM family for all n and a proof that the resulting correlations violate a valid n-locality witness, the universal claim is unsupported. A construction for only one value of n, or a witness that is not a bona fide n-locality inequality, would collapse the claim.
[Definitions: 'standard', 'compatible', 'non n-local'] The manuscript's central comparisons depend on definitions that are not recoverable from the accessible text. In particular, the notion of 'compatible measurements' must be specified as joint measurability or a weaker compatibility relation; if compatibility is obtained through classical post-processing of a fixed POVM, the entire burden falls on proving that the post-processed distribution violates n-locality. Likewise, 'standard linear n-local network', 'non-linear network', and 'non-standard network' need precise operational definitions. Without these definitions, the universal assertion 'in any standard linear n-local network' cannot be evaluated, and the claimed contrast with 'non-standard' networks is ambiguous.
[Topology-specific necessity claims] The abstract claims that in any non-linear star network one party must perform incompatible measurements, and that in any non-standard network all parties must perform incompatible measurements to obtain genuine non-n-local correlations. These are necessity claims, not merely existence claims. The supplied text provides no proof or even a clearly stated theorem statement for these assertions. Because 'non-standard network (all sources independent and nonlocal)' is a restricted and unusual class, the proof must specify which network topologies and source correlations are included, and whether 'genuine non n-local' is a strictly stronger notion than 'non n-local'. Without this, the claimed necessity results cannot be verified.
[Main text legibility] The body of the manuscript as supplied is largely corrupted, with broken glyphs and unreadable equations throughout. I cannot follow the derivations, locate the theorem statements, or check the proofs. This is a review-blocking issue independent of the scientific content. The authors should provide a clean, readable version so that the claims in the abstract can be checked against explicit constructions and proofs.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract / terminology] The abstract switches between 'non n-locality' and 'genuine non n-local correlations'. These should be defined and distinguished early; the relationship between 'non n-local' and 'genuine non n-local' is not clear from the abstract and affects the interpretation of the necessity claims.
[Abstract / scope of last sentence] The final sentence, 'merely providing resource of measurement incompatibility to all the parties is not sufficient for non n-locality detection in any quantum network', appears to be a broad statement. It should be qualified to the classes of networks actually covered, otherwise it is in tension with results in other network scenarios.
[Notation] The fragments of equations that are visible use inconsistent notation for POVMs and states. A consistent notation section, with all symbols defined, would greatly improve readability once the text is restored.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction found; the network-nonlocality claims are existence constructions with independent content.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are existential: for standard linear n-local networks, there exist quantum states and compatible measurements whose correlations violate the relevant n-locality inequalities, and for non-standard networks, incompatibility at all parties is allegedly necessary for genuine non n-locality. These claims are not self-definitional: n-locality is defined by a hidden-variable model with independent sources, while compatibility is defined by joint measurability of the local measurements, and the two notions are distinct. The visible equations are of the standard Bell-inequality form, comparing local/n-local bounds with quantum expectation values, rather than a fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction. No passage in the available text shows a quantity being defined in terms of the target result, and no load-bearing self-citation is identifiable. The full text is heavily corrupted, so the universal n>2 construction cannot be independently verified here, but a verification gap is not evidence of circularity. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited and the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard network model, a precise notion of compatible measurements, and valid non-locality witnesses. None of these are stated in detail in the abstract; their exact content could not be audited because the body text is corrupted. No free parameters or invented entities are visible from the abstract.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Standard n-local network model: multiple independent quantum sources, each party performs local measurements on their shares, no communication between parties.
The abstract's use of 'standard quantum network' and 'all sources independent and nonlocal' presupposes this standard network-nonlocality formalism, typically defined via hidden variable models over each source.
domain assumption Measurement compatibility is operationally characterized, e.g. by joint measurability, and is distinct from the independence of the network sources.
The resource statements compare compatible and incompatible measurements; without a fixed joint-measurability criterion the claims are not falsifiable. The abstract does not state this criterion.
domain assumption Non-n-locality detection is certified by a valid network inequality or equivalent witness whose violation has no hidden communication loophole.
The claim that non-n-local correlations 'can be generated' depends on the witnesses used to certify them; the abstract does not describe these witnesses.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Measurement Incompatibility Based In-equivalence Between Bell and Network Nonlocality." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FER7NXFH

@misc{pith2026250810670,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Measurement Incompatibility Based In-equivalence Between Bell and Network Nonlocality},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FER7NXFH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.10670}
}

read the original abstract

It is a well-known fact that measurement incompatibility is a necessary resource to generate nonlocal correlations in usual Bell scenario that typically involves single quantum source. We can provide with some contrasting findings if we consider connected structure of multiple quantum sources. Precisely, we demonstrate that non n-locality can be detected in standard quantum network even when only a single party performs incompatible measurements. More interestingly, for any finite n greater than 2, non n-local correlations can be generated in any standard linear n-local network when all the parties perform compatible measurements. Such an observation is topology specific as one of the parties must perform incompatible measurement to exhibit non n-locality in any non-linear network endowed with star topology. However, we observe that in any non-standard network(all sources independent and nonlocal), to generate genuine non n-local correlations, all the parties must perform incompatible measurements. Such a finding is intuitive as more resource is required to generate stronger form of quantum non-classicality. We also demonstrate that merely providing resource of measurement incompatibility to all the parties is not sufficient for non n-locality detection in any quantum network

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

[1]

Characterizing the Nonlocal Correlations Created via Entanglement Swapping

C. Branciard, N. Gisin, and S. Pironio, "Characterizing the Nonlocal Correlations Created via Entanglement Swapping", Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 170401 (2010)

work page 2010
[2]

Bilocal versus non-bilocal correlations in entanglement swapping experiments

C. Branciard, D. Rosset, N. Gisin and S. Pironio, "Bilocal versus non-bilocal correlations in entanglement swapping experiments", Phys. Rev. A 85, 032119 (2012)

work page 2012
[3]

Beyond Bell's theorem: correlation scenarios

T. Fritz, "Beyond Bell's theorem: correlation scenarios", New J. Phys. 14 103001 (2012)

work page 2012
[4]

Nonlinear bell inequalities tailored for quantum networks

D. Rosset, C. Branciard, T. J. Barnea, G. P¨utz, N. Brunner, and N. Gisin, "Nonlinear bell inequalities tailored for quantum networks", Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 010403 (2016)

work page 2016
[5]

Nonlinear bell inequalities tailored for quantum networks

D. Rosset,etal., "Nonlinear bell inequalities tailored for quantum networks", Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 010403 (2016)

work page 2016
[6]

Polynomial bell inequalities

R. Chaves, "Polynomial bell inequalities", Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 010402 (2016)

work page 2016
[7]

Genuine Quantum Nonlocality in the Triangle Network

, M.-O. Renou, E. Baumer, S. Boreiri, N. Brunner, N. Gisin, and S. Beigi, "Genuine Quantum Nonlocality in the Triangle Network" Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 140401 (2019)

work page 2019
[8]

Quantum theory based on real numbers can be experimentally falsified

M.-O. Renou, D. Trillo, M. Weilenmann, L. P. Thinh, A. Tavakoli, N. Gisin, A. Acin, and M. Navascues, "Quantum theory based on real numbers can be experimentally falsified" Nature 600, 625 (2021)

work page 2021

Show all 37 references

[9]

Quantum theory based on real numbers can be experimentally falsified

M.-O. Renou,etal., "Quantum theory based on real numbers can be experimentally falsified" Nature 600, 625 (2021)

2021
[10]

Correlations In n-local Scenario

K. Mukherjee, B. Paul, and D. Sarkar, "Correlations In n-local Scenario", Quantum Inf Process 14, 2025–2042 (2015)

2025
[11]

Measurement incompatibility at all remote parties do not always permit Bell nonlocality

P. Ghosh, C. Srivastava, S. Choudhary, U. Sen, "Measurement incompatibility at all remote parties do not always permit Bell nonlocality", Phys. Rev. A 111, 052208 (2025)

2025
[12]

Nontrilocality: Exploiting nonlocality from three particle systems

K. Mukherjee, B. Paul, and D. Sarkar, "Nontrilocality: Exploiting nonlocality from three particle systems", Phys. Rev. A 96, 022103 (2017)

2017
[13]

Characterizing quantum correlations in a fixed-input n-local network scenario

K. Mukherjee, B. Paul, and D. Sarkar, "Characterizing quantum correlations in a fixed-input n-local network scenario", Phys. Rev. A 101, 032328 (2020)

2020
[14]

Bell nonlocality in networks

A. Tavakoli, A. Pozas-Kerstjens, M-X Luo and M-O Renou "Bell nonlocality in networks", Reports on Progress in Physics, Volume 85, Number 5 (2022)

2022
[15]

Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories

J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, "Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories", Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969)

1969
[16]

All entangled pure quantum states violate the bilocality inequality

N. Gisin, Q.X. Mei, A. Tavakoli,M.O. Renou, and N. Brunner, "All entangled pure quantum states violate the bilocality inequality" Phys. Rev. A 96(2), 020304 (2017)

2017
[17]

, "Maximal qubit violation of n-locality inequalities in a star-shaped quantum network

F. Andreoli, G. Carvacho, L. Santodonato, R. Chaves and F. Sciarrino", "Maximal qubit violation of n-locality inequalities in a star-shaped quantum network", New J. Phys. 19 113020 (2017)

2017
[18]

Bilocal Bell inequalities violated by the quantum Elegant Joint Measurement

A. Tavakoli, N. Gisin, and Cyril Branciard, "Bilocal Bell inequalities violated by the quantum Elegant Joint Measurement" Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 220401 (2021)

2021
[19]

Full Network Nonlocality

A. Pozas-Kerstjens, N. Gisin and A. Tavakoli, "Full Network Nonlocality", Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 010403 (2022)

2022
[20]

Heinosaari, T

T. Heinosaari, T. Miyadera, and M. Ziman, An Invitation to Quantum Incompatibility, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 49, 123001 (2015)

2015
[21]

Incompatible measurements in quantum information science

O. Guhne, E. Haapasalo, T. Kraft, J-P Pellonpaa , and R. Uola, "Incompatible measurements in quantum information science", Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 011003(2023)

2023
[22]

Hidden Variables, Joint Probability, and the Bell Inequalities

A. Fine, "Hidden Variables, Joint Probability, and the Bell Inequalities", Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 291 (1982)

1982
[23]

Measurements incompatible in quantum theory cannot be measured jointly in any other no-signaling theory

M. M. Wolf, D. Perez-Garcia, and C. Fernandez, "Measurements incompatible in quantum theory cannot be measured jointly in any other no-signaling theory", Physical Review Letters 103, 230402 (2009)

2009
[24]

Incompatible quantum measurements admitting a local hidden variable model

M. T. Quintino, J. Bowles, F. Hirsch, and N. Brunner, "Incompatible quantum measurements admitting a local hidden variable model", Physical Review A 93, 052115 (2016)

2016
[25]

Quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality

F. Hirsch, M. T. Quintino, and N. Brunner, "Quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality",Physical Review A 97, 012129 (2018)

2018
[26]

Measurement incompatibility does not give rise to Bell violation in general

E. Bene and T. Vértesi, "Measurement incompatibility does not give rise to Bell violation in general", New Journal of Physics 20, 013021 (2018)

2018
[27]

Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction

C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, "Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction", Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996)

1996
[28]

Heinosaari, J

T. Heinosaari, J. Kiukas and D. Reitzner, Noise robustness of the incompatibility of quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. A 92, 022115 (2015)

2015
[29]

Guerini, J

L. Guerini, J. Bavaresco, M. Terra Cunha, and A. Acin, Operational framework for quantum measurement simulability, J. Math. Phys. 58, 092102 (2017)

2017
[30]

Skrzypczyk1, I

P. Skrzypczyk1, I. Supic and D. Cavalcanti, All Sets of Incompatible Measurements give an Advantage in Quantum State Discrimination, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 130403 (2019)

2019
[31]

Nonlocal correlations in the star-network configuration

A. Tavakoli, P. Skrzypczyk, D. Cavalcanti, and A. Acín, "Nonlocal correlations in the star-network configuration", Phys. Rev. A 90(6), 062109 (2014)

2014
[32]

Network Nonlocality Without Entanglement Of All Sources

K.Mukherjee and B.Paul, "Network Nonlocality Without Entanglement Of All Sources", arxiv. 2410.15131 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[33]

Unsharp reality and joint measurements for spin observables

P. Busch, "Unsharp reality and joint measurements for spin observables", Phys. Rev. D 33, 2253(1986)

1986
[34]

Persistency of non-n-local correlations in noisy linear networks

K.Mukherjee, I.Chakrabarty and G.Mylavarapu, " Persistency of non-n-local correlations in noisy linear networks", Phys. Rev. A 107,032404 (2023)

2023
[35]

Quantum discord for two-qubit systems

S. Luo, "Quantum discord for two-qubit systems", Phys. Rev. A 77, 042303 (2008)

2008
[36]

Bell nonlocality

N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, and S. Wehner "Bell nonlocality", Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 419 (2014)

2014
[37]

Strict hierarchy between n-wise measurement simulability, compatibility structures, and multi-copy compatibility

L. Tendick, C.Budroni and M.T. Quintino. "Strict hierarchy between n-wise measurement simulability, compatibility structures, and multi-copy compatibility", arxiv:2506.21223v2 (2025)

2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Characterizing the Nonlocal Correlations Created via Entanglement Swapping

C. Branciard, N. Gisin, and S. Pironio, "Characterizing the Nonlocal Correlations Created via Entanglement Swapping", Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 170401 (2010)

work page 2010

[2] [2]

Bilocal versus non-bilocal correlations in entanglement swapping experiments

C. Branciard, D. Rosset, N. Gisin and S. Pironio, "Bilocal versus non-bilocal correlations in entanglement swapping experiments", Phys. Rev. A 85, 032119 (2012)

work page 2012

[3] [3]

Beyond Bell's theorem: correlation scenarios

T. Fritz, "Beyond Bell's theorem: correlation scenarios", New J. Phys. 14 103001 (2012)

work page 2012

[4] [4]

Nonlinear bell inequalities tailored for quantum networks

D. Rosset, C. Branciard, T. J. Barnea, G. P¨utz, N. Brunner, and N. Gisin, "Nonlinear bell inequalities tailored for quantum networks", Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 010403 (2016)

work page 2016

[5] [5]

Nonlinear bell inequalities tailored for quantum networks

D. Rosset,etal., "Nonlinear bell inequalities tailored for quantum networks", Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 010403 (2016)

work page 2016

[6] [6]

Polynomial bell inequalities

R. Chaves, "Polynomial bell inequalities", Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 010402 (2016)

work page 2016

[7] [7]

Genuine Quantum Nonlocality in the Triangle Network

, M.-O. Renou, E. Baumer, S. Boreiri, N. Brunner, N. Gisin, and S. Beigi, "Genuine Quantum Nonlocality in the Triangle Network" Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 140401 (2019)

work page 2019

[8] [8]

Quantum theory based on real numbers can be experimentally falsified

M.-O. Renou, D. Trillo, M. Weilenmann, L. P. Thinh, A. Tavakoli, N. Gisin, A. Acin, and M. Navascues, "Quantum theory based on real numbers can be experimentally falsified" Nature 600, 625 (2021)

work page 2021