Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Co-Scaling and Alignment of Electric and Magnetic Towers

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Every tower of magnetically charged BPS strings in the 5d supergravity landscape is claimed to be paired with a tower of electrically charged BPS particles whose charge-to-mass vectors co-scale and rapidly align.

desk verdict A useful, honest exploratory paper whose main conjectures are not yet established; the reported GHMMR counterexample does not hold up, but Conjecture B still rests on an acknowledged tower-population assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22713 v2 pith:FFA57A6L submitted 2025-05-28 hep-th

Matthew Reece , Tom Rudelius , Christopher Tudball This is my paper
classification hep-th PACS 04.65.+e11.25.Mj
keywords co-scalingalignmentBPStowersfive-dimensionalsupergravityCalabi-Yauthreefoldmagneticinfinityconeweakgravityconjectureelectric-magneticduality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that in quantum gravity, electric and magnetic towers of charged states are not independent. Whenever one tower has a maximally divergent charge-to-mass ratio in a limit of moduli space, the paper claims, a partner tower of the opposite type exists whose charge-to-mass vector grows at the same rate ("co-scaling") and points in nearly the same direction as measured by the gauge kinetic matrix ("alignment", with "rapid alignment" when the angle dies as the inverse length). The detailed battleground is five-dimensional supergravity from M-theory on a Calabi-Yau threefold, where electric BPS particles come from M2-branes on curves and magnetic BPS strings come from M5-branes on divisors. There the paper verifies the pairing in several geometries and reduces it to a checkable geometric statement: the image of the hypereffective cone under a map built from the cubic prepotential is exactly the electric infinity cone. If that statement is right, the magnetic infinity cone becomes computable, and co-scaling becomes a sharp criterion for whether a low-energy gauge theory can be completed to quantum gravity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $S$-map $S(Y^I,\tilde{q}_J)=F^{IJ}(Y)\tilde{q}_J$, built from $F^{IJ}(Y)=C^{IJK}Y_K$, where $C^{IJK}$ are the triple intersection numbers of the Calabi-Yau threefold and $Y^I$ coordinates the Kähler moduli space. The hypereffective cone $E^{\mathrm{hyp}}$ is the cone generated by directions believed to carry infinite towers of BPS strings, and $K^{\mathrm{hyp}}$ extends the Kähler cone across flops and stable Weyl reflections; Conjecture 1 says the $S$-map sends $K^{\mathrm{hyp}}\times E^{\mathrm{hyp}}$ exactly onto the electric infinity cone $M_\infty$ of BPS particle towers. The mechanism proving co-scaling and rapid alignment is the identity $q^I=\lambda F^{IJ}\tilde{q}_J$: substituting it into the inverse kinetic matrix $a^{IJ}=Y^IY^J/(2F^{2/3})-F^{1/3}F^{IJ}$ forces $|z_{\mathrm{el}}|/|z_{\mathrm{mag}}|$ to be order one and $\cos\phi=(1-(z_{\mathrm{el}*}/z_{\mathrm{el}})^2)^{1/2}(1-(z_{\mathrm{mag}*}/z_{\mathrm{mag}})^2)^{1/2}$, which approaches $1$ at the rate $\phi\sim 1/|z|$ when the norms diverge.

What would settle it

Compute $S(K^{\mathrm{hyp}}\times E^{\mathrm{hyp}})$ on a Calabi-Yau threefold not among the paper's tested examples; a single charge in $E^{\mathrm{hyp}}$ whose $S$-image lies outside the electric infinity cone $M_\infty$ would refute Conjecture 1. Alternatively, find a 5d supergravity limit with a magnetic BPS string tower whose charge-to-tension vector is maximally divergent but no electric BPS particle tower has $|z|$ growing at the same rate and angle decaying as $1/|z|$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Conjecture B: in any 5d supersymmetric quantum gravity theory arising from a Calabi-Yau compactification, every tower of magnetically charged BPS strings exhibits co-scaling and rapid alignment with a tower of electrically charged BPS particles. The precise mathematical engine is Conjecture 1: with $Y^I$ in the hyperextended Kähler cone $K^{\mathrm{hyp}}$ and $\tilde{q}_J$ in the hypereffective cone $E^{\mathrm{hyp}}$, the image of the $S$-map $S(Y^I,\tilde{q}_J)=F^{IJ}(Y)\tilde{q}_J$ is exactly the electric infinity cone $M_\infty$. The authors show that a sufficient condition for a single electric-magnetic pair is the charge relation $q^I=\lambda F^{IJ}\tilde{q}_J$, and they prove this relation holds at superconformal-field-theory boundaries and in infinite-distance limits; they also show that co-scaling fails at conifold flops for isolated light particles and that toy extremal black holes with general scalar couplings can violate it. Conjecture 1 is presented as a reformulation of the co-scaling and rapid-alignment phenomenon that is potentially rigorously provable, and Conjecture 2, $E^{\mathrm{hyp}}=K_\infty$, is floated as a more speculative sharpening.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every direction in the hypereffective cone is populated by an infinite tower of BPS strings rather than only isolated BPS black strings; if some such direction carries only finitely many states, the claimed electric partner tower is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If Conjecture 1 holds, the magnetic infinity cone is effectively computable: it is the hypereffective cone $E^{\mathrm{hyp}}$, and every BPS string tower in it has a BPS particle tower that co-scales and rapidly aligns, proving Conjecture B.
  • In infinite-distance limits (emergent string or decompactification), electric and magnetic charge-to-mass ratios both stay order one, so co-scaling holds automatically; the new content is at finite-distance SCFT boundaries, where both diverge as $s^{-3/2}$ and the angle decays as the inverse length.
  • Co-scaling is a property of infinite towers, not isolated light states: at a conifold flop there is no tensionless magnetic string partner for the massless particle, while at stable SU(2) boundaries the monopole charge lies outside the magnetic infinity cone.
  • Co-scaling constrains the two-derivative action: extremal black holes in toy effective theories with non-dilatonic scalar couplings can violate $|z_{\mathrm{el}}|\sim|z_{\mathrm{mag}}|$, so requiring co-scaling excludes some low-energy theories as quantum-gravity completions.
  • Rapid alignment need not be universal for every tower: examples have electric towers that co-scale and align but not rapidly; in those cases a second electric tower rapidly aligns with the magnetic tower, so the strongest symmetric statement attaches to maximally divergent towers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the tested examples, Conjecture 1 can be probed by scanning more Calabi-Yau threefolds with known effective and Mori cones: a charge in $E^{\mathrm{hyp}}$ whose $S$-image leaves $M_\infty$ would refute the sharp characterization while leaving the co-scaling phenomenology intact.
  • The rate $\phi\sim 1/|z|$ in rapid alignment is exactly what makes electric and magnetic convex hulls similar in every direction; this suggests a quantitative version of co-scaling that bounds the subleading spectrum, a direction the paper only sketches.
  • If Conjecture 2 ($E^{\mathrm{hyp}}=K_\infty$) is accepted, the magnetic side of the weak gravity conjecture becomes as computable as the electric side, and one could look for divisor analogs of the curve-counting invariants that enumerate electric particle towers.
  • For axion phenomenology, co-scaling supports the bound $\Lambda_{\mathrm{QG}}\lesssim 2\pi\sqrt{S_{\mathrm{inst}}}f$ for extra-dimensional QCD axions, but the conifold counterexample means searches for light monopoles should target the partner electric tower scale rather than assume one from the monopole mass alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper introduces and explores two proposed properties of towers of charged states in quantum gravity: co-scaling, meaning that the norms of the electric and magnetic charge-to-mass (or charge-to-tension) vectors agree up to O(1) factors, and alignment, meaning that these vectors asymptotically point in the same direction, with a stronger notion of rapid alignment when the angle decays at least as fast as the inverse vector length. After heuristic arguments, the paper focuses on 5d M-theory compactifications on Calabi-Yau threefolds. The technical core is a classification of scaling behaviors of BPS particles and strings at moduli-space boundaries, a sufficient condition q^I = lambda F^{IJ} q̃_J for co-scaling and rapid alignment, and a pair of conjectures relating the 'magnetic infinity cone' to the hypereffective cone via the map S(Y,q̃) = F^{IJ}(Y) q̃_J. Conjecture 1 states S(K^hyp x E^hyp) = M_infinity and is claimed to imply Conjecture B, that every tower of magnetically charged BPS strings co-scales and rapidly aligns with a tower of electrically charged BPS particles. The paper tests these ideas in the GMSV, KMV, and GHMMR geometries, analyzes extremal black holes in non-UV-complete EFTs, and discusses dimensional reduction, 6d analogues, and phenomenological applications.

Significance. The paper contains several genuinely useful ingredients. Section 3.3's proof that q^I = lambda F^{IJ} q̃_J implies co-scaling and rapid alignment is clean, self-contained, and likely to be reusable. The scaling classification in Section 3.2 is systematic and includes appropriate caveats about accidental cancellations. The explicit convex-hull computations in Sections 3.6 and 3.7, and the numerical black-hole counterexamples in Section 4 showing that co-scaling is not a property of all extremal EFT solutions, are valuable and clearly presented. However, the headline Conjecture 1 is false as stated: the paper's own GHMMR example contains interior points (Y,q̃) whose S-image lies outside M_infinity. Since Conjecture 1 is the load-bearing bridge from the Section 3.3 algebra to Conjecture B, the paper's central mathematical characterization does not stand. The tower-population assumption behind Conjecture 2 is also explicitly unproven, but the failure of Conjecture 1 is already decisive.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.8, Conjecture 1 (§3.5.3)] Because the containment S(K^hyp × E^hyp) ⊆ M∞ is false, the argument in §3.5.3 that 'Conjecture 1 ensures that every BPS string tower co-scales and rapidly aligns with a corresponding tower of electrically charged particles' fails at its first step. For a magnetic direction q̃ with S(Y,q̃) ∉ M∞, there is no guarantee that an electric BPS tower of that charge exists; the §3.3 theorem only applies when the electric charge is realized in the spectrum. Thus Conjecture B is not established by the paper's reasoning, and the sharp characterization of the magnetic infinity cone advertised in the abstract is unsupported.
  2. [§3.5.2, 'Infinite towers vs. isolated states'] Independent of the counterexample in §3.8, the derivation of Conjecture B also depends on the unproven premise, stated in §3.5.2, that 'these BPS black strings come in infinite towers.' The paper honestly labels Conjecture 2 as speculative, but this means the passage from cone-level statements to towers of strings is conditional on an unverified input. Even if Conjecture 1 were repaired, Conjecture B would still require independent control of the magnetic tower population.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.7.1] The text says 'As in the case of the GMV geometry' but the geometry is elsewhere called the GMSV geometry; please correct the typo.
  2. [§3.2] The sentence 'these electric particles with z_el ∼ z^{-1/2}' should refer to s^{-1/2}; z is already the charge-to-mass ratio being classified.
  3. [References, [81]] Reference [81] is cited as 'to appear' and is used for the load-bearing containment K^hyp ⊆ C^{Bstr} ⊆ K∞. Since the reader cannot verify this input, the authors should either make a public preprint available or include a summary of the argument in the text.
  4. [§3.6.4, §3.7.3] The verifications of Conjecture 1 are phrased by checking generators of E^hyp. Since the S-map depends on Y, the statements such as 'S(K^{phase I}, E^hyp) = M∞' should make explicit that they mean the union over Y ∈ K^{phase I} of the cones generated by S(Y, e_i) for generators e_i of E^hyp.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Partial circularity: the bridge from Conjecture 1 to Conjecture B rests on an unpublished self-citation and an assumed tower population, while the core §3.3 co-scaling algebra is self-contained.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 3.5.2, eq. (3.77)]
    "We begin with the results of [81] (based on the earlier works [46, 67]), which show that BPS black strings exist for all charge directions inside the hyperextended Kähler cone K^hyp. We may reasonably assume that these BPS black strings come in infinite towers, since after dimensional reduction to four dimensions, these monopole strings become ordinary monopoles, which (by the Tower WGC [5, 28]) should come in infinite towers. Thus, by the same logic that produced the containment relations (3.14) for the electric charge lattice, we may similarly conclude that K^hyp ⊆ C^Str_B ⊆ K^∞."

    The containment K^hyp ⊆ K^∞ is the load-bearing bridge that lets Conjecture 1 imply Conjecture B: every magnetic tower charge lies in E^hyp, and the S-map sends it to an electric tower charge in M∞. The cited support for this bridge is [81], an unpublished work coauthored by present author Rudelius, supplemented by an explicit assumption that black strings come in infinite towers. Thus the universal 5d conclusion is not derived from the paper's own prepotential computations; it inherits its force from a to-appear self-citation and an assumed tower population. This is reliance on an unverified input rather than a constructional equivalence, so it raises the circularity score but does not make the whole derivation definitionally circular.

  2. other [Section 3.5.3, just before Conjecture 1 and after Conjecture 1]
    "Faced with this obstacle, we shall turn the logic around: rather than using properties of 5d supergravity and Calabi-Yau geometry to argue for co-scaling and alignment, we will instead assume alignment and co-scaling and use it to justify a pair of novel mathematical conjectures. ... Since, K∞ ⊆ Ehyp by (3.78), Conjecture 1 ensures that every BPS string tower co-scales and rapidly aligns with a corresponding tower of electrically charged particles. In other words, Conjecture 1 implies Conjecture B."

    The argumentative structure is circular if Conjecture 1 is presented as support for Conjecture B: Conjecture 1 is introduced by explicitly assuming the co-scaling/alignment phenomenon, and then the same conjecture is used to 'ensure' that phenomenon. The mathematical statement of Conjecture 1, namely S(K^hyp × E^hyp) = M∞, is independently stated and checked in examples, so this is a motivational loop rather than an identity by construction. It does not by itself force the result, but it means the paper's logical chain from co-scaling to the sharp cone characterization is not fully independent of the conclusion it is used to derive.

full rationale

The paper's concrete 5d calculations are not circular: §3.3 derives co-scaling and rapid alignment from the condition q = λ F_IJ q̃ using only the prepotential and gauge kinetic matrix; §3.4 derives that SCFT boundaries satisfy this relation; and the GMSV and KMV examples are explicit computations with no parameter fitted to the claimed result. The circular features lie in the bridge from these calculations to Conjecture B. Conjecture 1 is introduced by 'assum[ing] alignment and co-scaling' and then said to imply Conjecture B, which is a motivational loop unless the example checks independently establish Conjecture 1. Additionally, the required containment K∞ ⊆ E^hyp rests on the unpublished, coauthored reference [81] and on an explicit 'may reasonably assume' that BPS black strings come in infinite towers. These are self-referential inputs, but the mathematical content of Conjecture 1 is not equivalent by construction to those inputs, and the central prepotential-based derivations stand on their own. The paper is therefore partially self-referential but not wholly circular; the score reflects load-bearing self-citation and a motivational loop rather than a definitional equivalence.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No numerical fitting is used in the central 5d argument; the black-hole section uses toy coupling functions with arbitrary parameters to demonstrate violations, but these are not fitted to data. The derivation relies on the standard Calabi-Yau/supergravity dictionary and on two unproven assumptions: infinite towers of BPS black strings in K^hyp, and absence of wall-crossing for BPS strings. The magnetic infinity cone is introduced as a new mathematical entity with a conjectured equality that can be checked in examples.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption BPS particles in 5d M-theory compactifications come from M2-branes wrapping holomorphic curves, and BPS strings from M5-branes wrapping effective divisors, with masses and tensions given by equations (3.6) and (3.7).
    Sets up the dictionary between charge cones and Calabi-Yau geometry; standard in the supergravity literature but not proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption The hyperextended Kähler cone K^hyp and the electric infinity cone M∞ satisfy M∞ = (K^hyp)^∨, as established in reference [46].
    Used throughout sections 3.1.1 and 3.5; reference [46] includes one of the present authors, so this is self-cited prior work.
  • domain assumption BPS black strings exist for every charge direction in K^hyp and come in infinite towers, as attributed to reference [81], cited as 'to appear'.
    This is load-bearing for the lower bound K^hyp subset K∞ in section 3.5.2 and for interpreting Conjecture 1 physically; the cited result is unpublished at the time of writing.
  • domain assumption Absence of wall-crossing for BPS strings after complex-structure deformation implies K∞ subset E^hyp.
    Used in section 3.5.2 to bound the magnetic infinity cone; the paper explicitly flags this as tentative because wall-crossing for BPS strings is poorly understood.
  • standard math Miyaoka's theorem that the integral of c2 wedge J over a Kähler class J is nonnegative.
    Invoked in section 3.4.2 to support the assumption C0 > 0 in examples of SCFT boundaries.
invented entities (1)
  • Magnetic infinity cone K∞ independent evidence
    purpose: Mathematical object conjectured to equal the hypereffective cone E^hyp, characterizing directions in H4(X,R) that support infinite towers of BPS strings from effective divisors.
    Defined in section 3.5 and bounded using BPS string physics; Conjecture 2 makes a falsifiable geometric equality. It is a new mathematical construct rather than a new physical particle or force.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Co-Scaling and Alignment of Electric and Magnetic Towers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FFA57A6L

@misc{pith2026250522713,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Co-Scaling and Alignment of Electric and Magnetic Towers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FFA57A6L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22713}
}
abstract

Towers of electrically and magnetically charged states in quantum gravity often exhibit two important properties. First, the ratio of the mass (or tension) of electrically charged states to magnetically charged states is of order $e^2/(4\pi)$, which we refer to as "co-scaling." Second, in theories of multiple gauge fields, the towers of states that exhibit co-scaling have charges that point in approximately the same direction in charge space as measured by the gauge kinetic matrix, which we refer to as "alignment." After motivating these ideas with some heuristic arguments, we examine the spectrum of BPS states in the 5d supergravity landscape arising from M-theory on a Calabi-Yau threefold. In this setting, every tower of magnetically charged strings is paired with a corresponding tower of electrically charged particles that exhibits co-scaling and rapid alignment. In particular, this motivates a sharp mathematical characterization of the magnetic infinity cone in Calabi-Yau geometry. We propose a universal conjecture about quantum gravity: towers of charged states which, in some limit in moduli space, have maximally divergent charge-to-mass ratios always have corresponding magnetic partner states exhibiting co-scaling and alignment. Co-scaling is not a general feature of extremal black hole solutions in theories of gauge fields and scalars, suggesting that it is a principle of UV complete quantum gravity. We briefly remark on possible phenomenological applications, including to axion physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.22713 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of rapid alignment (left) and slow alignment (right). The electric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Electric and magnetic convex hulls near the SCFT boundary of the GMSV ge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Electric and magnetic convex hulls near the conifold locus of the GMSV geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Electric and magnetic convex hulls for the KMV geometry. For [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Electric and magnetic convex hulls for the KMV geometry, projected on the plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Plots of ζe, ζm, and the log of their ratio for the example in §4.2 with quadratic α. The first three sub-figures each depict ζe, ζm for a given value of λ; note the logarithmic scale in the y-axis. The final sub-figure plots the natural log of the ratio ζm ζe = |zel| …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: ν := ∂[log (ζm/ζe)] ∂[log λ] as a function of ϕ for increasing values of λ for the example in §4.2 with quadratic α. Peaks form around ϕ = ±1, while ν → 0 elsewhere, indicating that the electric and magnetic charge-to-mass ratios co-scale everywhere except at ϕ = ±1. s…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Plots of ζe, ζm, and the log of their ratio for the example in §4.3. The first three sub-figures each depict ζe, ζm for a given value of λ; note the linear scale in the y-axis. The final sub-figure plots the log (base e) of the ratio ζm ζe = |zel| |zmag| for the λ valu…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: ν := ∂[log (ζm/ζe)] ∂[log λ] as a function of ϕ for increasing values of λ for the example in §4.3. It may appear that the log10 [λ] = 1 plot terminates at ∼ ±3.3, but rather there is a jump to being much closer to zero. maintaining control of the instanton expansion, …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The ζe,h(ϕ∞) := We,h(ϕ∞)/Qe(ϕ∞), as well as ζe(ϕ∞) := We(ϕ∞)/Qe(ϕ∞), for the system given by (B.7). Note that at any given point ϕ, the value of the dotted ζe(ϕ) is given everywhere by the smallest value amongst the solid ζe,h(ϕ)’s that are defined at ϕ. Similarly, fo…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Q2 e (ϕ) given by (B.24), for Q2 e (0) = 1, λ = 10. Note the logarithmic scale on the y-axis. B.2.2 Example: Quadratic α We now turn to the example in §4.2. We once again consider a theory with a single modulus ϕ and a single gauge field, but now we let the electric c…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Q2 e (ϕ) given by (B.26), for Q2 e (0) = 1, λ = 10. Note the logarithmic scale on the y-axis. λ → ∞, we have α(ϕ) →    −∞ for ϕ ∈ R 2 tanh [(ϕ − 2)(ϕ + 2)] for ϕ ∈ {−1, +1} tanh [(ϕ − 2)(ϕ + 2)] otherwise . (B.28) In other words, for large λ, α is large but neg…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Integral Scaling for EFT Strings from the Bottom-Up

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Under brane-taxonomy axioms and an n_e≤7 homogeneity bound, integral scaling with w≤3 is an exhaustive finite consequence for all EFT string candidates in 4d N=1 moduli slices.

  2. Moduli-Space Laplacians, Asymptotic Geometry, and the Emergent String Conjecture

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under the Emergent String Conjecture, the logarithm of any principal tower mass has a moduli-space Laplacian eigenvalue quantized to N/(D-d) for KK towers and N/2 for string oscillators, equal to the instanton-weighte...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, “On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,”Nucl.Phys.B766(2007) 21–33,arXiv:hep-th/0605264 [hep-th]. 2, 10

    arXiv 2007

  2. [2]

    Infinite Distances in Field Space and Massless Towers of States,

    T. W. Grimm, E. Palti, and I. Valenzuela, “Infinite Distances in Field Space and Massless Towers of States,”JHEP08(2018) 143,arXiv:1802.08264 [hep-th]. 2, 11

    arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Emergence of Weak Coupling at Large Distance in Quantum Gravity,

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius, “Emergence of Weak Coupling at Large Distance in Quantum Gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121no. 5, (2018) 051601, arXiv:1802.08698 [hep-th]. 2, 11, 12

    arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Sharpening the Weak Gravity Conjecture with Dimensional Reduction,

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius, “Sharpening the Weak Gravity Conjecture with Dimensional Reduction,”JHEP02(2016) 140,arXiv:1509.06374 [hep-th]. 2, 5, 49, 65 67

    arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Evidence for a Lattice Weak Gravity Conjecture,

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius, “Evidence for a Lattice Weak Gravity Conjecture,”JHEP08(2017) 025,arXiv:1606.08437 [hep-th]. 2, 5, 33

    arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    The Refined Swampland Distance Conjecture in Calabi-Yau Moduli Spaces,

    R. Blumenhagen, D. Kl¨ awer, L. Schlechter, and F. Wolf, “The Refined Swampland Distance Conjecture in Calabi-Yau Moduli Spaces,”JHEP06(2018) 052, arXiv:1803.04989 [hep-th]. 2

    arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Infinite Distance Networks in Field Space and Charge Orbits,

    T. W. Grimm, C. Li, and E. Palti, “Infinite Distance Networks in Field Space and Charge Orbits,”JHEP03(2019) 016,arXiv:1811.02571 [hep-th]. 2

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Tensionless Strings and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand, “Tensionless Strings and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,”JHEP10(2018) 164,arXiv:1808.05958 [hep-th]. 2

    arXiv 2018

Show all 100 references
  1. [9]

    A Stringy Test of the Scalar Weak Gravity Conjecture,

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand, “A Stringy Test of the Scalar Weak Gravity Conjecture,”Nucl. Phys. B938(2019) 321–350,arXiv:1810.05169 [hep-th]. 2

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    The Swampland Distance Conjecture for K¨ ahler moduli,

    P. Corvilain, T. W. Grimm, and I. Valenzuela, “The Swampland Distance Conjecture for K¨ ahler moduli,”JHEP08(2019) 075,arXiv:1812.07548 [hep-th]. 2

    2019 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Emergent strings, duality and weak coupling limits for two-form fields,

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand, “Emergent strings, duality and weak coupling limits for two-form fields,”JHEP02(2022) 096,arXiv:1904.06344 [hep-th]. 2

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Instantons and infinite distances,

    F. Marchesano and M. Wiesner, “Instantons and infinite distances,”JHEP08(2019) 088,arXiv:1904.04848 [hep-th]. 2

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    The Swampland Distance Conjecture and Towers of Tensionless Branes,

    A. Font, A. Herr´ aez, and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, “The Swampland Distance Conjecture and Towers of Tensionless Branes,”JHEP08(2019) 044,arXiv:1904.05379 [hep-th]. 2

    2019 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Emergent strings from infinite distance limits,

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand, “Emergent strings from infinite distance limits,”JHEP02(2022) 190,arXiv:1910.01135 [hep-th]. 2, 10, 20

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Merging the weak gravity and distance conjectures using BPS extremal black holes,

    N. Gendler and I. Valenzuela, “Merging the weak gravity and distance conjectures using BPS extremal black holes,”JHEP01(2021) 176,arXiv:2004.10768 [hep-th]. 2

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    The EFT stringy viewpoint on large distances,

    S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci, and I. Valenzuela, “The EFT stringy viewpoint on large distances,”JHEP09(2021) 197,arXiv:2104.05726 [hep-th]. 2

    2021 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Large Field Distances from EFT strings,

    S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci, and I. Valenzuela, “Large Field Distances from EFT strings,”PoSCORFU2021(2022) 169,arXiv:2205.04532 [hep-th]. 2

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Sharpening the Distance Conjecture in diverse dimensions,

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, S. Kaya, Y. Qiu, and T. Rudelius, “Sharpening the Distance Conjecture in diverse dimensions,”JHEP12(2022) 114, arXiv:2206.04063 [hep-th]. 2, 20, 22 68

    2022 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Bounds on Species Scale and the Distance Conjecture,

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, and M. Wiesner, “Bounds on Species Scale and the Distance Conjecture,”Fortsch. Phys.71no. 10-11, (2023) 2300143, arXiv:2303.13580 [hep-th]. 2

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Running decompactification, sliding towers, and the distance conjecture,

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, T. Rudelius, I. Ruiz, and I. Valenzuela, “Running decompactification, sliding towers, and the distance conjecture,”JHEP12 (2023) 182,arXiv:2306.16440 [hep-th]. 2

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Dense geodesics, tower alignment, and the Sharpened Distance Conjecture,

    M. Etheredge, “Dense geodesics, tower alignment, and the Sharpened Distance Conjecture,”JHEP01(2024) 122,arXiv:2308.01331 [hep-th]. 2

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Gopakumar-Vafa invariants and the Emergent String Conjecture,

    T. Rudelius, “Gopakumar-Vafa invariants and the Emergent String Conjecture,” JHEP03(2024) 061,arXiv:2309.10024 [hep-th]. 2, 19, 20

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Density of states, black holes and the Emergent String Conjecture,

    A. Bedroya, R. K. Mishra, and M. Wiesner, “Density of states, black holes and the Emergent String Conjecture,”JHEP01(2025) 144,arXiv:2405.00083 [hep-th]. 2, 30

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Emergent Strings in Type IIB Calabi–Yau Compactifications,

    B. Friedrich, J. Monnee, T. Weigand, and M. Wiesner, “Emergent Strings in Type IIB Calabi–Yau Compactifications,”arXiv:2504.01066 [hep-th]. 2

  17. [25]

    The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis, and C. Vafa, “The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force,”JHEP0706(2007) 060, arXiv:hep-th/0601001 [hep-th]. 2, 5, 10

    2007 arXiv

  18. [26]

    The Weak Gravity Conjecture in three dimensions,

    M. Montero, G. Shiu, and P. Soler, “The Weak Gravity Conjecture in three dimensions,”JHEP10(2016) 159,arXiv:1606.08438 [hep-th]. 2, 5

    2016 arXiv

  19. [27]

    The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Emergence from an Ultraviolet Cutoff,

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius, “The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Emergence from an Ultraviolet Cutoff,”Eur. Phys. J.C78no. 4, (2018) 337, arXiv:1712.01868 [hep-th]. 2, 11

    2018 arXiv

  20. [28]

    A Tower Weak Gravity Conjecture from Infrared Consistency,

    S. Andriolo, D. Junghans, T. Noumi, and G. Shiu, “A Tower Weak Gravity Conjecture from Infrared Consistency,”Fortsch. Phys.66no. 5, (2018) 1800020, arXiv:1802.04287 [hep-th]. 2, 5, 33

    2018 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Proving the Weak Gravity Conjecture in perturbative string theory. Part I. The bosonic string,

    B. Heidenreich and M. Lotito, “Proving the Weak Gravity Conjecture in perturbative string theory. Part I. The bosonic string,”JHEP05(2025) 102,arXiv:2401.14449 [hep-th]. 2

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Taxonomy of infinite distance limits,

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, T. Rudelius, I. Ruiz, and I. Valenzuela, “Taxonomy of infinite distance limits,”JHEP03(2025) 213,arXiv:2405.20332 [hep-th]. 2

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    EFT strings and dualities in 4dN= 1,

    A. Grieco, I. Ruiz, and I. Valenzuela, “EFT strings and dualities in 4dN= 1,” arXiv:2504.16984 [hep-th]. 2 69

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Taxonomy of branes in infinite distance limits,

    M. Etheredge, “Taxonomy of branes in infinite distance limits,”arXiv:2505.10615 [hep-th]. 2

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories,”Nucl. Phys. B79 (1974) 276–284. 3

    1974

  26. [34]

    Particle Spectrum in Quantum Field Theory,

    A. M. Polyakov, “Particle Spectrum in Quantum Field Theory,”JETP Lett.20 (1974) 194–195. 3

    1974

  27. [35]

    On gauge enhancement and singular limits in G 2 compactifications of M-theory,

    J. Halverson and D. R. Morrison, “On gauge enhancement and singular limits in G 2 compactifications of M-theory,”JHEP04(2016) 100,arXiv:1507.05965 [hep-th]. 3

    2016 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Black Holes in Higher Dimensional Space-Times,

    R. C. Myers and M. J. Perry, “Black Holes in Higher Dimensional Space-Times,” Annals Phys.172(1986) 304. 4

    1986

  29. [37]

    Black strings and P-branes,

    G. T. Horowitz and A. Strominger, “Black strings and P-branes,”Nucl. Phys. B360 (1991) 197–209. 4, 49, 65

    1991

  30. [38]

    ADM masses for black strings and p-branes,

    J. X. Lu, “ADM masses for black strings and p-branes,”Phys. Lett. B313(1993) 29–34,arXiv:hep-th/9304159. 4

    1993 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Black and super p-branes in diverse dimensions,

    M. J. Duff and J. X. Lu, “Black and super p-branes in diverse dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B416(1994) 301–334,arXiv:hep-th/9306052. 4

    1994 arXiv

  32. [40]

    The black branes of M-theory,

    M. J. Duff, H. Lu, C. N. Pope, and L. Alvarez-Gaum´ e, “The black branes of M-theory,”Phys. Lett. B382(1996) 73–80,arXiv:hep-th/9604052. 4

    1996 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Extra-dimensional axion expectations,

    M. Reece, “Extra-dimensional axion expectations,”JHEP07(2025) 130, arXiv:2406.08543 [hep-ph]. 4, 6, 13, 14, 26, 55, 56

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    The asymptotic Weak Gravity Conjecture for open strings,

    C. Fierro Cota, A. Mininno, T. Weigand, and M. Wiesner, “The asymptotic Weak Gravity Conjecture for open strings,”JHEP11(2022) 058,arXiv:2208.00009 [hep-th]. 5

    2022 arXiv

  35. [43]

    The minimal weak gravity conjecture,

    C. Fierro Cota, A. Mininno, T. Weigand, and M. Wiesner, “The minimal weak gravity conjecture,”JHEP05(2024) 285,arXiv:2312.04619 [hep-th]. 5

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Scalar Fields,

    E. Palti, “The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Scalar Fields,”JHEP08(2017) 034, arXiv:1705.04328 [hep-th]. 5

    2017 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Repulsive Forces and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius, “Repulsive Forces and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,”JHEP10(2019) 055,arXiv:1906.02206 [hep-th]. 5, 15

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Moduli space reconstruction and Weak Gravity,

    N. Gendler, B. Heidenreich, L. McAllister, J. Moritz, and T. Rudelius, “Moduli space reconstruction and Weak Gravity,”JHEP12(2023) 134,arXiv:2212.10573 [hep-th]. 7, 18, 19, 33, 34, 35, 37, 39, 46, 47 70

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Naturalness and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, “Naturalness and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,” Phys.Rev.Lett.113(2014) 051601,arXiv:1402.2287 [hep-ph]. 7

    2014 arXiv

  40. [48]

    The String landscape and the swampland,

    C. Vafa, “The String landscape and the swampland,”arXiv:hep-th/0509212 [hep-th]. 9

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Curvature divergences in 5dN= 1 supergravity,

    A. Blanco, F. Marchesano, and L. Melotti, “Curvature divergences in 5dN= 1 supergravity,”arXiv:2505.05558 [hep-th]. 9, 19, 22, 26

  42. [50]

    On the moduli space curvature at infinity,

    F. Marchesano, L. Melotti, and L. Paoloni, “On the moduli space curvature at infinity,”JHEP02(2024) 103,arXiv:2311.07979 [hep-th]. 9

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Asymptotic curvature divergences and non-gravitational theories,

    F. Marchesano, L. Melotti, and M. Wiesner, “Asymptotic curvature divergences and non-gravitational theories,”JHEP02(2025) 151,arXiv:2409.02991 [hep-th]. 9

    2025 arXiv

  44. [52]

    The Moduli Space Curvature and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,

    A. Castellano, F. Marchesano, L. Melotti, and L. Paoloni, “The Moduli Space Curvature and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,”arXiv:2410.10966 [hep-th]. 9

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    What is the Magnetic Weak Gravity Conjecture for Axions?,

    A. Hebecker, P. Henkenjohann, and L. T. Witkowski, “What is the Magnetic Weak Gravity Conjecture for Axions?,”Fortsch. Phys.65no. 3-4, (2017) 1700011, arXiv:1701.06553 [hep-th]. 10

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Weak Gravity Strongly Constrains Large-Field Axion Inflation,

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius, “Weak Gravity Strongly Constrains Large-Field Axion Inflation,”JHEP12(2015) 108,arXiv:1506.03447 [hep-th]. 10

    2015 arXiv

  47. [55]

    IR/UV mixing, towers of species and swampland conjectures,

    A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez, and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, “IR/UV mixing, towers of species and swampland conjectures,”JHEP08(2022) 217,arXiv:2112.10796 [hep-th]. 11

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    The emergence proposal in quantum gravity and the species scale,

    A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez, and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, “The emergence proposal in quantum gravity and the species scale,”JHEP06(2023) 047,arXiv:2212.03908 [hep-th]. 11

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    The emergence proposal and the emergent string,

    R. Blumenhagen, A. Gligovic, and A. Paraskevopoulou, “The emergence proposal and the emergent string,”JHEP10(2023) 145,arXiv:2305.10490 [hep-th]. 11

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Demystifying the Emergence Proposal,

    R. Blumenhagen, N. Cribiori, A. Gligovic, and A. Paraskevopoulou, “Demystifying the Emergence Proposal,”JHEP04(2024) 053,arXiv:2309.11551 [hep-th]. 11

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    On the particle picture of Emergence,

    J. Hattab and E. Palti, “On the particle picture of Emergence,”JHEP03(2024) 065,arXiv:2312.15440 [hep-th]. 11

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Large N bounds on, and compositeness limit of, gauge and gravitational interactions,

    G. Veneziano, “Large N bounds on, and compositeness limit of, gauge and gravitational interactions,”JHEP06(2002) 051,arXiv:hep-th/0110129. 11

    2002 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,

    G. Dvali, “Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,” Fortsch. Phys.58(2010) 528–536,arXiv:0706.2050 [hep-th]. 11 71

    2010 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Evaporation of Microscopic Black Holes in String Theory and the Bound on Species,

    G. Dvali and D. Lust, “Evaporation of Microscopic Black Holes in String Theory and the Bound on Species,”Fortsch. Phys.58(2010) 505–527,arXiv:0912.3167 [hep-th]. 11

    2010 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Systematics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications,

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Berglund, J. P. Conlon, and F. Quevedo, “Systematics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications,”JHEP03(2005) 007, arXiv:hep-th/0502058. 12

    2005 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Phase transitions in M theory and F theory,

    E. Witten, “Phase transitions in M theory and F theory,”Nucl. Phys.B471(1996) 195–216,arXiv:hep-th/9603150 [hep-th]. 18

    1996 arXiv

  57. [65]

    M theory and topological strings. 1.,

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa, “M theory and topological strings. 1.,” arXiv:hep-th/9809187 [hep-th]. 19

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    M theory and topological strings. 2.,

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa, “M theory and topological strings. 2.,” arXiv:hep-th/9812127 [hep-th]. 19

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    The Weak Gravity Conjecture and BPS Particles,

    M. Alim, B. Heidenreich, and T. Rudelius, “The Weak Gravity Conjecture and BPS Particles,”Fortsch. Phys.69no. 11-12, (2021) 2100125,arXiv:2108.08309 [hep-th]. 19, 29, 33, 34, 35, 37, 41

    2021 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Anomalies and Fermion Zero Modes on Strings and Domain Walls,

    C. G. Callan, Jr. and J. A. Harvey, “Anomalies and Fermion Zero Modes on Strings and Domain Walls,”Nucl. Phys. B250(1985) 427–436. 29

    1985

  61. [69]

    Axionic Strings: Covariant Anomalies and Bosonization of Chiral Zero Modes,

    S. G. Naculich, “Axionic Strings: Covariant Anomalies and Bosonization of Chiral Zero Modes,”Nucl. Phys. B296(1988) 837–867. 29

    1988

  62. [70]

    TASI 2003 lectures on anomalies,

    J. A. Harvey, “TASI 2003 lectures on anomalies,” 9, 2005.arXiv:hep-th/0509097. 29

    2003 arXiv

  63. [71]

    The Weak Gravity Conjecture and axion strings,

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius, “The Weak Gravity Conjecture and axion strings,”JHEP11(2021) 004,arXiv:2108.11383 [hep-th]. 29

    2021 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Moduli-dependent species scale,

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner, and D. H. Wu, “Moduli-dependent species scale,”Beijing J. Pure Appl. Math.1no. 1, (2024) 1–41,arXiv:2212.06841 [hep-th]. 30

    2024 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Species scale in diverse dimensions,

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner, and D. H. Wu, “Species scale in diverse dimensions,”JHEP05(2024) 112,arXiv:2310.07213 [hep-th]. 30

    2024 arXiv

  66. [74]

    On the species scale, modular invariance and the gravitational EFT expansion,

    A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez, and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, “On the species scale, modular invariance and the gravitational EFT expansion,”JHEP12(2024) 019, arXiv:2310.07708 [hep-th]. 30

    2024 arXiv

  67. [75]

    The Double EFT Expansion in Quantum Gravity,

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, A. Castellano, and A. Herr´ aez, “The Double EFT Expansion in Quantum Gravity,”arXiv:2501.14880 [hep-th]. 30 72

    arXiv

  68. [76]

    Supersymmetric Completion of an R**2 term in Five-dimensional Supergravity,

    K. Hanaki, K. Ohashi, and Y. Tachikawa, “Supersymmetric Completion of an R**2 term in Five-dimensional Supergravity,”Prog. Theor. Phys.117(2007) 533, arXiv:hep-th/0611329. 30

    2007 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Higher derivatives in Type II and M-theory on Calabi-Yau threefolds,

    T. W. Grimm, K. Mayer, and M. Weissenbacher, “Higher derivatives in Type II and M-theory on Calabi-Yau threefolds,”JHEP02(2018) 127,arXiv:1702.08404 [hep-th]. 30

    2018 arXiv

  70. [78]

    The Chern classes and Kodaira dimension of a minimal variety,

    Y. Miyaoka, “The Chern classes and Kodaira dimension of a minimal variety,” in Algebraic geometry, Sendai, 1985, vol. 10 ofAdv. Stud. Pure Math., pp. 449–476. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1987.https://doi.org/10.2969/aspm/01010449. 31

    1985

  71. [79]

    Trilinear forms and Chern classes of Calabi-Yau threefolds,

    A. Kanazawa and P. M. H. Wilson, “Trilinear forms and Chern classes of Calabi-Yau threefolds,”Osaka Journal of Mathematics51no. 1, (2014) 203–213, arXiv:1201.3266 [math.AG]. 31

    2014 arXiv

  72. [80]

    The K¨ ahler cone on Calabi-Yau threefolds,

    P. M. H. Wilson, “The K¨ ahler cone on Calabi-Yau threefolds,”Invent. Math.107 no. 3, (1992) 561–583.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01231902. 33

    1992 doi

  73. [81]

    The Weak Gravity Conjecture and BPS Strings,

    B. Heidenreich, N. Pittman, and T. Rudelius, “The Weak Gravity Conjecture and BPS Strings,” 2025. to appear. 33

    2025

  74. [82]

    Black hole condensation and the unification of string vacua,

    B. R. Greene, D. R. Morrison, and A. Strominger, “Black hole condensation and the unification of string vacua,”Nucl. Phys.B451(1995) 109–120, arXiv:hep-th/9504145 [hep-th]. 35

    1995 arXiv

  75. [83]

    A Geometric realization of confinement,

    B. R. Greene, D. R. Morrison, and C. Vafa, “A Geometric realization of confinement,”Nucl. Phys.B481(1996) 513–538,arXiv:hep-th/9608039 [hep-th]. 35

    1996 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Mirror symmetry, mirror map and applications to complete intersection Calabi-Yau spaces,

    S. Hosono, A. Klemm, S. Theisen, and S.-T. Yau, “Mirror symmetry, mirror map and applications to complete intersection Calabi-Yau spaces,”Nucl. Phys.B433(1995) 501–554,arXiv:hep-th/9406055 [hep-th]. [AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math.1,545(1996)]. 39

    1995 arXiv

  77. [85]

    BPS states of exceptional noncritical strings,

    A. Klemm, P. Mayr, and C. Vafa, “BPS states of exceptional noncritical strings,” Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.58(1997) 177,arXiv:hep-th/9607139 [hep-th]. 41

    1997 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Weak gravity conjecture,

    D. Harlow, B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius, “Weak gravity conjecture,” Rev. Mod. Phys.95no. 3, (2023) 035003,arXiv:2201.08380 [hep-th]. 49, 61, 62, 65

    2023 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291,arXiv:hep-th/9802150. 53 73

    1998 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Massless black holes and conifolds in string theory,

    A. Strominger, “Massless black holes and conifolds in string theory,”Nucl. Phys. B 451(1995) 96–108,arXiv:hep-th/9504090. 53

    1995 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Axion Monodromy and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,

    A. Hebecker, F. Rompineve, and A. Westphal, “Axion Monodromy and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,”JHEP04(2016) 157,arXiv:1512.03768 [hep-th]. 55

    2016 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings,

    E. Witten, “Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings,”Phys. Lett.149B(1984) 351–356. 55

    1984

  83. [91]

    A QCD axion from higher dimensional gauge field,

    K.-w. Choi, “A QCD axion from higher dimensional gauge field,”Phys. Rev. Lett.92 (2004) 101602,arXiv:hep-ph/0308024. 55

    2004 arXiv

  84. [92]

    The QCD axion and moduli stabilisation,

    J. P. Conlon, “The QCD axion and moduli stabilisation,”JHEP05(2006) 078, arXiv:hep-th/0602233 [hep-th]. 55

    2006 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Axions In String Theory,

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten, “Axions In String Theory,”JHEP06(2006) 051, arXiv:hep-th/0605206 [hep-th]. 55

    2006 arXiv

  86. [94]

    String Theory and Grand Unification Suggest a Sub-Microelectronvolt QCD Axion,

    J. N. Benabou, K. Fraser, M. Reig, and B. R. Safdi, “String Theory and Grand Unification Suggest a Sub-Microelectronvolt QCD Axion,”arXiv:2505.15884 [hep-ph]. 55, 56

    arXiv

  87. [95]

    Axion species scale and axion weak gravity conjecture-like bound,

    M.-S. Seo, “Axion species scale and axion weak gravity conjecture-like bound,”JHEP 11(2024) 082,arXiv:2407.16156 [hep-th]. 56 [96]MoEDALCollaboration, B. Acharyaet al., “The Physics Programme Of The MoEDAL Experiment At The LHC,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A29(2014) 1430050, arXiv:1405...

    2024 arXiv

  88. [98]

    Notes on sugra with eight supercharges,

    B. Heidenreich, “Notes on sugra with eight supercharges,” 2018. Unpublished. 57

    2018

  89. [99]

    Abelian vector multiplets in six-dimensional supergravity,

    F. Riccioni, “Abelian vector multiplets in six-dimensional supergravity,”Phys. Lett. B474(2000) 79–84,arXiv:hep-th/9910246. 57

    2000 arXiv

  90. [100]

    Structure in 6D and 4D N=1 supergravity theories from F-theory,

    T. W. Grimm and W. Taylor, “Structure in 6D and 4D N=1 supergravity theories from F-theory,”JHEP10(2012) 105,arXiv:1204.3092 [hep-th]. 60

    2012 arXiv

  91. [101]

    Mapping 6D N = 1 supergravities to F-theory,

    V. Kumar, D. R. Morrison, and W. Taylor, “Mapping 6D N = 1 supergravities to F-theory,”JHEP02(2010) 099,arXiv:0911.3393 [hep-th]. 60, 61

    2010 arXiv

  92. [102]

    Black Holes, Moduli, and Long-Range Forces,

    B. Heidenreich, “Black Holes, Moduli, and Long-Range Forces,”JHEP11(2020) 029,arXiv:2006.09378 [hep-th]. 61 74

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.