The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2402.15500 · v2 · pith:FFAH3HOZ · submitted 2024-02-23 · cond-mat.supr-con

Measurements of the first-flux-penetration field in surface-treated and coated Nb: Distinguishing between surface pinning and an interface energy barrier

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:FFAH3HOZrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords mathrmfieldcoatedenergypenetrationsurfacesurface-treatedbarrier
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We report measurements of the first-flux-penetration field in surface-treated and coated Nb samples using muon spin rotation ($\mu$SR). Using thin Ag foils as energy moderators for the implanted muon spin-probes, we "profile" the vortex penetration field $\mu_{0} H_{\mathrm{vp}}$ at sub-surface depths on the order of $\sim 10$ $\mathrm{\mu}$m to $\sim 100$ $\mathrm{\mu}$m. In a coated sample [Nb$_3$Sn(2 $\mathrm{\mu}$m)/Nb], we find that $\mu_{0} H_{\mathrm{vp}}$ is depth-independent with a value of 234.5(35) mT, consistent with Nb's metastable superheating field and suggestive of surface energy barrier for flux penetration. Conversely, in a surface-treated sample [Nb baked in vacuum at 120 $^{\circ}$C for 48 h], vortex penetration onsets close to pure Nb's lower critical field $\mu_{0}H_\mathrm{c1} \approx 170$ mT, but increases with increasing implantation depth, consistent with flux-pinning localized at the surface. The implication of these results for technical applications of superconducting Nb, such as superconducting radio frequency (SRF) cavities, is discussed.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.