Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 44 references

Driven phase-mixed Alfv\'en waves in a partially ionized solar plasma

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A finite-lifetime wave driver lets Alfvén pulses damp more slowly and carry more energy into the corona.

desk verdict Finite-lifetime Alfvén drivers in a partially ionized chromosphere: a clean, useful comparison with continuous drivers, but the headline claim about exponential-to-algebraic damping rests on undisclosed fits in a case the authors themselves attribute to numerical truncation. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08732 v1 pith:FFR6FBXW submitted 2025-06-10 astro-ph.SR physics.plasm-phphysics.space-ph

classification astro-ph.SRphysics.plasm-phphysics.space-ph MSC 85A3076W05
keywords AlfvénwavesphasemixingpartialionizationsolarchromospherewaveheatingpulsedriverCowlingdiffusionMHD
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that how an Alfvén wave driver is switched on and off changes where the Sun's atmospheric heating happens. Using a single-fluid model of a partially ionized chromosphere with a cross-field Alfvén speed gradient, it simulates shear Alfvén waves driven by a pulse that lasts one period and compares them with continuously driven waves. The central finding is that pulses initially damp like continuous waves but then switch to a slower algebraic decay, because the pulse broadens and its effective wavelength grows, weakening the dissipative gradients that a steady driver keeps replenishing. If true, impulsive chromospheric events inject Alfvén energy that reaches the corona more easily, while continuous drivers remain the more efficient chromospheric heaters.

What carries the argument

The central object is the linearized, incompressible, single-fluid MHD equation for the magnetic-field perturbation $b$, which combines phase mixing with ohmic, Cowling (ambipolar), and viscous dissipation: $\partial^2 b/\partial t^2 = v_A^2(x)\,\partial^2 b/\partial z^2 + [(\eta+\nu_v)\,\partial^2/\partial x^2 + (\eta_C+\nu_v)\,\partial^2/\partial z^2]\partial b/\partial t - \nu_v[\eta\,\partial^2/\partial x^2 + \eta_C\,\partial^2/\partial z^2]\nabla^2 b$. The driver is a single-period pulse, the ionization degree $\mu$ fixes the transport coefficients, and the four Alfvén speed profiles (homogeneous, cosine, mild tanh, steep tanh) set the phase-mixing strength. The paper measures damping through the integrated displacement of the wave profile rather than its peak amplitude, because broadening and amplitude loss compete; this displacement measure is what reveals the exponential-to-algebraic transition.

What would settle it

Rerun the one-period pulse simulations in a stratified chromosphere with height-dependent ionization, transport coefficients, and Alfvén speed profile taken from a solar atmospheric model; if the pulse no longer shows an extended algebraic damping phase or no longer reaches greater heights than the continuous wave, the central claim would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors find that in a partially ionized, transversally inhomogeneous plasma, phase-mixed Alfvén pulses have a lower overall decay rate than continuously driven waves of the same frequency and amplitude. The damping profile changes from exponential to algebraic once the pulse has propagated beyond a distance set by the ionization degree, the Alfvén speed gradient, and the driver frequency; this transition is not caused directly by phase mixing but by partial ionization introducing extra Cowling diffusion that mixes the many frequencies a pulse contains. Phase mixing widens the pulse, increasing its effective wavelength and reducing longitudinal gradients, while a continuous driver preserves the wavelength through constant energy injection at the base. The paper also shows that heating rates are identical to the continuous case until the driver is switched off, and that with ionization degrees $\mu\approx 0.5181$--$0.6570$ and a 2.5 km s$^{-1}$ amplitude, phase-mixed pulses can balance quiet-Sun chromospheric radiative losses while still sending more energy farther upward than continuous waves do.

Load-bearing premise

The central damping results rest on the assumption that a single-fluid, linearized, isothermal MHD model with constant transport coefficients, no gravitational stratification, and a fixed nine-to-one density contrast faithfully represents the partially ionized chromosphere.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Impulsively driven Alfvén waves deposit less energy in the chromosphere than continuous waves of the same frequency and amplitude, allowing pulses to reach greater heights with more energy left.
  • Phase mixing of a pulse broadens its profile, so its effective wavelength grows and longitudinal-gradient damping (mainly Cowling diffusion) becomes progressively weaker.
  • For ionization degrees near $\mu=0.6$, the difference between pulse and continuous damping is largest, while near full or very weak ionization the difference shrinks.
  • With steep cross-field Alfvén speed gradients, all simulated wavelengths dissipate more than 80 percent of their energy within roughly 2000 km, showing that strong phase mixing is efficient regardless of driver type.
  • Continuous drivers are the stronger chromospheric heating candidates, while single-period pulses are the more plausible carriers of Alfvén energy into the corona.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the exponential-to-algebraic transition is a spectral effect: because a pulse is a superposition of frequency components, the onset distance of the algebraic regime should shift with the driver's bandwidth, a prediction testable by chirped or multi-period drivers.
  • An extension of the paper's logic is that the crossover distance should vary with height in the real Sun, since ionization degree, Alfvén speed, and density contrast all change with altitude; height-resolved observations of transient transverse oscillations could look for the predicted broadening and slower-than-exponential decay.
  • The paper does not state this, but if pulses carry more energy to the corona, then chromospheric heating estimates based on continuous sinusoidal drivers may overestimate how much Alfvén energy is deposited low down, while coronal heating estimates based on the same drivers may underestimate the available energy flux.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies linear, incompressible, single-fluid MHD simulations of shear Alfvén waves in a partially ionized, transversally inhomogeneous plasma, comparing a single-period pulse driver with a continuous harmonic driver. The governing equation (5) includes shear viscosity, Ohmic diffusion, and Cowling diffusion, with transport coefficients evaluated from the AL c7 model. The paper reports that pulses damp less than continuous waves, that displacement-based damping lengths increase with wavelength and decrease with steeper Alfvén-speed gradients and with ionization degrees near μ≈0.6, that pulse and continuous heating rates are initially identical, and that the pulse damping profile can change from exponential to algebraic, which the authors interpret as allowing pulses to carry more energy into the corona.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper makes a useful contribution by showing that the choice of wave driver affects where Alfvén-wave energy is deposited in the partially ionized chromosphere, with pulses potentially more efficient at transporting energy to the corona and continuous drivers more efficient at heating the chromosphere. The model setup is clearly described, the comparison with McMurdo et al. (2023) is appropriate, and the use of physical transport coefficients is a step beyond idealized treatments. However, the key new result—the exponential-to-algebraic damping transition and the resulting lower decay rate—currently rests on qualitative fits and on a homogeneous case in which the authors themselves attribute profile changes to numerical truncation. The absence of convergence tests and the lack of a demonstrated connection between the displacement measure and the energy decay leave the main quantitative conclusion insufficiently supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2, Figures 6–7] The abstract's central claim that Alfvén pulses possess a lower overall decay rate due to a change in damping profile from exponential to algebraic is not quantitatively supported. The evidence is a qualitative assessment and fits to an unspecified 'combination of functions'; no functional form, fitted exponents, breakpoints, or uncertainties are reported. Moreover, the example in Figure 6 uses the homogeneous P1 profile, the case for which Section 4 states that pulse broadening is due to truncation errors in the finite-difference scheme. Since Section 3.1 also states that pulse profiles change with spatial and temporal resolution whereas continuous-driver profiles do not, the algebraic tail could be a numerical artifact. A spatial and temporal convergence study for the pulse runs, together with a transparent fit procedure, is required before the change of damping regime can be regarded as physical.
  2. [Section 4.3, Eq. (7)] The paper defines the damping length using the integrated displacement D = ∫|b| dz and asserts that the square of this displacement 'reproduces the decay of E to high accuracy', where E is the normalized energy. This equivalence is not demonstrated and is not generally true for a pulse that broadens and changes shape. Because the conclusion that pulses carry more energy into the corona is an energy statement, the paper should compute E(t) directly, quantify the error of the displacement proxy, and base the damping-length analysis on the quantity that actually measures energy.
  3. [Section 5, limitations] The quantitative conclusions—damping lengths, heating rates, and the suggestion that pulses can balance chromospheric radiative losses and heat the corona—are drawn from a model with constant transport coefficients, an isothermal background, no gravitational stratification, and a fixed Alfvén-speed profile. The authors acknowledge these omissions, but the discussion should go further and state which conclusions are robust to them. In particular, because the dissipative coefficients and the Alfvén-speed gradient vary strongly with height in the chromosphere, the stratified case could change the relative damping of pulses and continuous waves, not just the absolute rates, and the paper should either address this or temper the solar-atmosphere claims.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 4.2] The phrase 'lower overall decay rate' is never precisely defined; consider defining it in terms of E(t) or of the displacement measure actually used.
  2. [Section 4.2] The sentence 'By fitting a combination of functions' should give the actual functional forms and fitting method; otherwise Figure 6 cannot be reproduced or independently assessed.
  3. [Figure 7] The green/red/gray classification of damping-profile changes is subjective; provide quantitative criteria, such as fit residuals or a statistical test for a change in decay law.
  4. [Equation (7)] Equation (7) is called the 'normalized pulse energy' even though the text immediately notes it is not exact; this wording is confusing and should be revised.
  5. [Throughout] There are several typographical and formatting artifacts, including 'Alfvén' with a nonstandard accent in the title and the 'LATEXtwocolumnstyle' line; these should be cleaned up.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Central pulse-damping result is not circular; one definitional statement about identical initial heating rates inflates a construction property into a finding.

  1. self definitional [Section 4.4 (Heating rates), paragraph following Eq. (8)]
    "Both derivatives are dependent on the amplitude of the wave and hence initially (at least for time steps up to the point where the pulse driver is switched off), the heating rates for the Alfvén pulse and the continuously driven Alfvén wave are identical since the pulses are generated by a continuous driver lasting only a finite time."

    The pulse driver is defined as the same sinusoidal driver as the continuous case, switched off after one period. Therefore the initial equality of the wave profile, and hence of the heating rate computed from Eq. (8), is a direct consequence of the driver construction, not an independent numerical finding. The abstract presents this as a result ('Our findings indicate...'), but it reduces by definition to the setup. This is a minor tautology and does not support the main exponential-to-algebraic damping claim, which rests on the independent pulse simulations and their fits.

full rationale

The main claim that Alfvén pulses damp more slowly than continuously driven waves, with a change from exponential to algebraic decay, is not circular. Pulses are simulated by solving Eq. (5) with a time-dependent driver that is turned off after one period; the comparison with the continuous-driver case uses the same solver, background, and parameters, and no fitted parameter is used to produce the pulse evolution. The exponential-to-algebraic transition is an empirical characterization of the simulation output, although the fitting function is not disclosed (a reproducibility issue, not circularity). The reliance on McMurdo et al. (2023) for the numerical solver, transport coefficients, and continuous-wave envelopes is normal prior-work citation rather than a load-bearing self-citation: the pulse-specific results are new simulations, and the cited work is itself an independent numerical study. The only genuinely tautological element is the statement that pulse and continuous drivers have identical initial heating rates, which is true by construction because the pulse is a truncated continuous driver. Concerns about numerical artifacts in the homogeneous P1 case and undisclosed fits are correctness/validation risks, not derivation-circularity, so they do not raise the score. Score 2 reflects the minor definitional statement while the central derivation is self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The scientific content is carried by the model assumptions and parameter choices listed above; the main unquantified item is the damping-profile fit.

free parameters (4)
  • Alfvén speed cross-field gradient (profile shape and steepness) = vA varies by factor 3 over l_inh = 300 km; tanh widths 0.1 l_inh (P3) and 0.03 l_inh (P4)
    The abstract explicitly treats the cross-field gradient in Alfvén speed as a free parameter; profiles P1-P4 are prescribed to isolate phase-mixing strength, not derived from observations.
  • Ionization degree mu = 0.5036 to 0.6628 (neutral fraction roughly 2-50%)
    Scanned parameter; range is restricted to values where the numerical back-reaction artifact is deemed negligible, so it is selected partly for numerical reasons.
  • Driver frequency / initial wavelength = 27-133 mHz; wavelengths 150-750 km
    Five driver frequencies are scanned to study the wavelength dependence of the damping length.
  • Damping-profile fit coefficients = not reported
    The exponential-to-algebraic transition is obtained 'by fitting a combination of functions' in Section 4.2, but the fit parameters and goodness-of-fit are not given, so the key damping-profile claim is not quantitatively reproducible.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Single-fluid MHD with Cowling diffusion, ambipolar diffusion, magnetic diffusion, and shear viscosity captures Alfvén wave damping in a partially ionized plasma.
    Governing equation (5) is assembled from these transport coefficients in Section 2.
  • domain assumption The plasma is isothermal, quasi-neutral, hydrogen-only, with constant collisional cross-sections and constant background magnetic field.
    Stated in Section 2; transport coefficients are treated as constants even though cross-sections are temperature dependent.
  • domain assumption Linearized incompressible MHD is valid for the wave amplitudes considered.
    The governing equation is linear in b; no nonlinear terms are included.
  • domain assumption Neglecting gravitational stratification and height/time dependence of the Alfvén speed and dissipative coefficients does not change the qualitative conclusions.
    Acknowledged as a limitation in Section 5; the authors expect a richer form of local damping rates in stratified environments.
  • domain assumption A pulse can be treated as a superposition of exponentially damped monochromatic waves, yielding algebraic decay after summing over frequencies.
    Fourier-superposition argument in Section 4.2; used to explain the exponential-to-algebraic transition.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Driven phase-mixed Alfv\'en waves in a partially ionized solar plasma." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FFR6FBXW

@misc{pith2026250608732,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Driven phase-mixed Alfv\'en waves in a partially ionized solar plasma},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FFR6FBXW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08732}
}
read the original abstract

Phase mixing has long been understood to be a viable mechanism for expediting the dissipation of Alfv\'en wave energy resulting in the subsequent heating of the solar atmosphere. To fulfil the conditions necessary for phase mixing to occur, we consider the cross-field gradient in the Alfv\'en speed as a free parameter in our model. Using a single-fluid description of a partially ionized chromospheric plasma, we explore the efficiency of damping of shear Alfv\'en waves subject to phase mixing when a pulse wave driver is employed. Our results demonstrate a strong dependence of the dissipation length of shear Alfv\'en waves on both the ionization degree of the plasma and the gradient of the Alfv\'en speed. When assessing the efficiency of phase mixing across various inhomogeneities, our findings indicate that waves originating from a pulse driver exhibit initially identical heating rates as those generated by a continuous wave driver. One key difference observed was that Alfv\'en pulses possess a lower overall decay rate due to a change in damping profile from exponential to algebraic. This discrepancy arises from the absence of a consistent injection of energy into the base of the domain, that preserves longitudinal gradients of the magnetic field perturbations more effectively. These findings demonstrate the importance of understanding the relations between the wave driver, damping mechanisms, and propagation dynamics in resolving the atmospheric heating problem.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08732 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The ionization degree and plasma temperature are plotted with height according to the AL c7 model (Avrett & Loeser 2008) for heights above the solar surface up to 3000 km. In a single fluid plasma, the effects of partial ioniza￾tion are cast in the various transport coefficients includ￾ing the Cowling diffusion, related to ambipolar diffu￾sion, which appears thanks to the lack of response of neutral particles to the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The different profiles of the Alfv´en speeds as given by Equation (6) used throughout the analysis are shown by curves of different colors. Speeds and lengths are given in dimensionless units. The tanh profiles are symmetric about the midpoint of the inhomogeneity in order to apply peri￾odic boundary conditions in the transversal direction to our numerical solver, hence removing the effects of fixed bound￾aries. For… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The evolution of a sinusoidally excited Alfv´en pulse at three simulation time steps. The initial profile corresponds to the moment the driver terminates and represents a pulse with a wavelength of 300 km (shown in red at the base of the domain). Subsequent time steps …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The variation in the displacement of each of the Alfv´en pulses with propagation for the four different Alfv´en speed profiles given by P1 − P4 profiles (shown by different colors), for six different ionization degrees and an initial wavelength of 300 km. tween the hom…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The damping profile for an Alfv´en pulse is shown to be a sum of an exponential and algebraic component. The relative importance of each damping profile varies with prop￾agation as evidenced by the intersection of these profiles. The physical parameters for this simula…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: For each simulation, the resulting damping profiles are represented using a color-coded grid: green indicates a change in the damping profile, red signifies no change, and gray represents cases where the results were inconclusive or no clear change could be determined.…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The variation in the displacement of finitely excited Alfv´en waves with distance for each of the four Alfv´en speed profiles considering a single ionization degree given by µ = 0.6161. In the case of the heating rate associated with longi￾tudinal gradients, the heatin…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The variation in the displacement of our Alfv´en pulses with distance for the five different wavelengths for six different ionization degrees in the case of the Alfv´en speed profile given by P4. heating rate profiles of Alfv´en waves excited with a con￾tinuous driver.…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Damping length of the integrated displacement of the wave shown as functions of wavelength. For P1,2 the damping length is not achieved for the longest wavelength and has to be omitted. tain extent before naturally realigning, another limiting behavior restricts trans…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The profile of the heating rate obtained from the continuously excited sinusoidal wave driver (solid lines) is plotted with the tracked maximum heating rate of the Alfv´en pulse (dotted line) over the propagated distance. The discrepancy between the results shown in t…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Anfinogentov, S., Nistic` o, G., & Nakariakov, V. M. 2013, A&A, 560, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322094

  2. [2]

    H., & Loeser, R

    Avrett, E. H., & Loeser, R. 2008, ApJS, 175, 229, doi: 10.1086/523671

  3. [3]

    B., Nakariakov, V

    Bate, W., Jess, D. B., Nakariakov, V. M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5c53

  4. [4]

    Braginskii, S. I. 1965, Reviews of Plasma Physics, 1, 205

  5. [5]

    Musielak, Z. E. 2014, Acta Physica Polonica A, 125, 158, doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.125.158

  6. [6]

    2017, A&A, 601, A122, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730403

    Danilovic, S. 2017, A&A, 601, A122, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730403

  7. [7]

    2013, Ap&SS, 343, 11, doi: 10.1007/s10509-012-1241-0

    Ebadi, H., & Hosseinpour, M. 2013, Ap&SS, 343, 11, doi: 10.1007/s10509-012-1241-0

  8. [8]

    H., Xu, Z., Ding, M

    Fang, C., Tang, Y. H., Xu, Z., Ding, M. D., & Chen, P. F. 2006, ApJ, 643, 1325, doi: 10.1086/501342

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    K., et al

    Gafeira, R., Lagg, A., Solanki, S. K., et al. 2017, ApJS, 229, 6, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/229/1/6

  2. [10]

    2019, A&A, 626, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935376

    Hansteen, V., Ortiz, A., Archontis, V., et al. 2019, A&A, 626, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935376

  3. [11]

    H., Archontis, V., Pereira, T

    Hansteen, V. H., Archontis, V., Pereira, T. M. D., et al. 2017, ApJ, 839, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6844

  4. [12]

    S., Tu, C

    He, J. S., Tu, C. Y., Marsch, E., et al. 2009, A&A, 497, 525, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200810777

  5. [13]

    Heyvaerts, J., & Priest, E. R. 1983, A&A, 117, 220

  6. [14]

    W., Brooks, S

    Hood, A. W., Brooks, S. J., & Wright, A. N. 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, 458, 2307, doi: 10.1098/rspa.2002.0959

  7. [15]

    W., Ireland, J., & Priest, E

    Hood, A. W., Ireland, J., & Priest, E. R. 1997, A&A, 318, 957

  8. [16]

    K., Stangalini, M., et al

    Jafarzadeh, S., Solanki, S. K., Stangalini, M., et al. 2017, ApJS, 229, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/229/1/10

  9. [17]

    B., Mathioudakis, M., Erd´ elyi, R., et al

    Jess, D. B., Mathioudakis, M., Erd´ elyi, R., et al. 2009, Science, 323, 1582, doi: 10.1126/science.1168680

  10. [18]

    Joshi, J., Rouppe van der Voort, L. H. M., & de la Cruz Rodr ´ ıguez, J. 2020, A&A, 641, L5, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038769

  11. [19]

    Kilpua, E. K. J. 2024, A&A, 681, A60, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245638

  12. [20]

    2012, ApJ, 749, 136, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/749/2/136

    Leenaarts, J., Carlsson, M., & Rouppe van der Voort, L. 2012, ApJ, 749, 136, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/749/2/136

  13. [21]

    2015, ApJ, 802, 136, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/136 Mart ´ ınez-Sykora, J., Hansteen, V., & Moreno-Insertis, F

    Leenaarts, J., Carlsson, M., & Rouppe van der Voort, L. 2015, ApJ, 802, 136, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/136 Mart ´ ınez-Sykora, J., Hansteen, V., & Moreno-Insertis, F. 2011, ApJ, 736, 9, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/9 Mart ´ ınez-Sykora, J., Pontieu, B. D., Hansteen, V. H., ...

  14. [22]

    W., de Pontieu, B., Carlsson, M., et al

    McIntosh, S. W., de Pontieu, B., Carlsson, M., et al. 2011, Nature, 475, 477, doi: 10.1038/nature10235

  15. [23]

    2023, ApJ, 958, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0364

    McMurdo, M., Ballai, I., Verth, G., Alharbi, A., & Fedun, V. 2023, ApJ, 958, 81, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0364

  16. [24]

    2008, Astronomische Nachrichten, 329, 780, doi: 10.1002/asna.200811031

    Mocanu, G., Marcu, A., Ballai, I., & Orza, B. 2008, Astronomische Nachrichten, 329, 780, doi: 10.1002/asna.200811031

  17. [25]

    J., Freij, N., Reid, A., et al

    Nelson, C. J., Freij, N., Reid, A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 845, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7e7a Nistic` o, G., Nakariakov, V. M., & Verwichte, E. 2013, A&A, 552, A57, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220676

  18. [26]

    J., & De Pontieu, B

    Okamoto, T. J., & De Pontieu, B. 2011, ApJL, 736, L24, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/736/2/L24

  19. [27]

    J., Hood, A

    Pascoe, D. J., Hood, A. W., de Moortel, I., & Wright, A. N. 2012, A&A, 539, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117979

  20. [28]

    J., Hood, A

    Pascoe, D. J., Hood, A. W., De Moortel, I., & Wright, A. N. 2013, A&A, 551, A40, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220620 17

  21. [29]

    J., Wright, A

    Pascoe, D. J., Wright, A. N., De Moortel, I., & Hood, A. W. 2015, A&A, 578, A99, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321328

  22. [30]

    Rawat, A., & Gupta, G. R. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 4815, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2426 Rouppe van der Voort, L. H. M., Rutten, R. J., & Vissers, G. J. M. 2016, A&A, 592, A100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628889

  23. [31]

    S., & Petrukhin, N

    Ruderman, M. S., & Petrukhin, N. S. 2018, A&A, 620, A44, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833639

  24. [32]

    J., Vissers, G

    Rutten, R. J., Vissers, G. J. M., Rouppe van der Voort, L. H. M., S¨ utterlin, P., & Vitas, N. 2013, in Journal of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 440, Journal of Physics Conference Series (IOP), 012007, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/440/1/012007

  25. [33]

    K., & Singh, B

    Srivastava, A. K., & Singh, B. 2023, Physics, 5, 655, doi: 10.3390/physics5030043

  26. [34]

    Sukarmadji, A. R. C., & Antolin, P. 2024, ApJL, 961, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1402

  27. [35]

    2010, A&A, 524, A23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014845

    Terradas, J., Goossens, M., & Verth, G. 2010, A&A, 524, A23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014845

  28. [36]

    O., & McLaughlin, J

    Thurgood, J. O., & McLaughlin, J. A. 2013, A&A, 558, A127, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322021

  29. [37]

    K., Morton, R

    Tiwari, A. K., Morton, R. J., & McLaughlin, J. A. 2021, ApJ, 919, 74, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac10c4

  30. [38]

    2016, Physics of Plasmas, 23, 122906, doi: 10.1063/1.4972574 Van Damme, H

    Tsiklauri, D. 2016, Physics of Plasmas, 23, 122906, doi: 10.1063/1.4972574 Van Damme, H. J., De Moortel, I., Pagano, P., & Johnston, C. D. 2020, A&A, 635, A174, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937266

  31. [39]

    Rutten, R. J. 2013, ApJ, 774, 32, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/32

  32. [40]

    2014, MNRAS, 445, 1614, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1887

    Vranjes, J. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 1614, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1887

  33. [41]

    Vranjes, J., & Krstic, P. S. 2013, A&A, 554, A22, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220738

  34. [42]

    Voort, L., & Rutten, R. J. 2011, ApJ, 736, 71, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/71

  35. [43]

    L., & Noyes, R

    Withbroe, G. L., & Noyes, R. W. 1977, ARA&A, 15, 363, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.15.090177.002051

  36. [44]

    2016, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol

    Yang, L., Zhang, L., He, J., et al. 2016, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 1720, Solar Wind 14 (AIP), 040022, doi: 10.1063/1.4943833

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.