REVIEW 3 cited by
Second-Order Uncertainty Quantification: A Distance-Based Approach
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In the past couple of years, various approaches to representing and quantifying different types of predictive uncertainty in machine learning, notably in the setting of classification, have been proposed on the basis of second-order probability distributions, i.e., predictions in the form of distributions on probability distributions. A completely conclusive solution has not yet been found, however, as shown by recent criticisms of commonly used uncertainty measures associated with second-order distributions, identifying undesirable theoretical properties of these measures. In light of these criticisms, we propose a set of formal criteria that meaningful uncertainty measures for predictive uncertainty based on second-order distributions should obey. Moreover, we provide a general framework for developing uncertainty measures to account for these criteria, and offer an instantiation based on the Wasserstein distance, for which we prove that all criteria are satisfied.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Quantification of Credal Uncertainty: A Distance-Based Approach
IPM distances yield total, aleatoric (set-valued then endpoint-summarized), and epistemic (half-diameter) uncertainty measures for multiclass credal sets; TV recovers the binary Hüllermeier et al. decomposition with l...
-
Uncertainty Quantification for Regression: A Unified Framework based on kernel scores
Kernel-score divergences define a unified family of regression uncertainty measures whose kernel choice controls robustness, tail sensitivity, and OOD responsiveness.
-
Uncertainty Quantification with Proper Scoring Rules: Adjusting Measures to Prediction Tasks
Uncertainty measures derived from proper scoring rules should be chosen to match the task loss; total uncertainty suits selective prediction, zero-one loss suits active learning.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.