Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Alternative harmonic detection approach for quantitative determination of spin and orbital torques

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An out-of-plane angular harmonic Hall geometry quantitatively separates damping-like and field-like spin-orbit torques and reveals a twofold damping-like enhancement from a naturally oxidized copper interface.

desk verdict Useful OOP harmonic Hall metrology advance with an internally consistent derivation and good cross-checks; the thermal-model assumptions and high-field degeneracy need tightening, but the core claim holds. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00403 v1 pith:FGXD5RG7 submitted 2024-12-31 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Y. Xu , B. Bony , S. Krishnia , R. Torrão Victor , S. Collin , A. Fert , J.-M. George , V. Cros
show 1 more author
H. Jaffrès
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords spin-orbittorqueharmonicHallvoltageorbitaldamping-likefield-likemagnonmagnetoresistanceanomalousNernsteffectout-of-planeangulargeometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that rotating the magnetic field out of the sample plane during harmonic Hall measurements gives a direct, quantitative readout of spin-orbit torque effective fields in in-plane magnetized films, without the full field sweep normally required in the standard in-plane geometry. The analytical model for the second-harmonic voltage separates the damping-like term, the field-like term, and thermoelectric voltages by their distinct angular signatures, so the torque values are less contaminated by thermal artifacts and by the magnon-magnetoresistance terms that complicate in-plane measurements. Applied to Co(2)|Pt(4)|CuOx(3), the method yields a damping-like field of about 2.4 mT/($10^{11}$ A/m$^2$), twice the value for the AlOx reference stack, which the authors attribute to orbital current generated at the Cu|CuOx interface. If correct, the out-of-plane geometry is a reliable alternative metrology for spin and orbital torques and strengthens the case for oxidized copper as an orbital-torque source.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is Eq. (8), the analytical second-harmonic model for the out-of-plane geometry, together with the self-consistent equilibrium relation $\tan\theta_M = H_{\rm ext}\sin\theta_H/(H_K\cos\theta_M + H_{\rm ext}\cos\theta_H)$. Equation (8) decomposes $V_{2\omega}$ into a damping-like term proportional to $1/[H_{\rm ext}\cos(\theta_H-\theta_M)+H_K\cos(2\theta_M)]$, a field-like term proportional to $1/(H_{\rm ext}\cos\theta_H)$, and an anomalous-Nernst thermoelectric term $\alpha(T_{OOP}\cos\theta_M + T_{IP}\sin\theta_M)$. The angular separation of these terms, symmetric versus antisymmetric around $\theta_H=90^\circ$, is what makes a single-field fit possible and what lets the method discard magnon magnetoresistance, whose in-plane $\cos^3(\varphi)$ signature is absent when injected angular momentum is transverse to the magnetization.

What would settle it

Measure the out-of-plane second-harmonic signal on a sample whose in-plane harmonic data show a clear magnon-magnetoresistance contribution; if the out-of-plane signal contains a comparable $\cos^3$-type angular component, the claim that magnon magnetoresistance is absent in that geometry is falsified, while repeating the fits at several temperatures and bias currents would expose any unmodeled thermoelectric term.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the out-of-plane angular second-harmonic Hall response of an in-plane magnetized sample can be written as a sum of three terms with distinct angular symmetries: a damping-like term proportional to $1/[H_{\rm ext}\cos(\theta_H-\theta_M)+H_K\cos(2\theta_M)]$, a field-like term proportional to $1/(H_{\rm ext}\cos\theta_H)$, and a thermoelectric term $\alpha(T_{OOP}\cos\theta_M + T_{IP}\sin\theta_M)$. Fitting this expression to a single angular scan at fixed field extracts the damping-like and field-like effective fields together with the two thermal coefficients, and the results agree with values obtained in the conventional in-plane geometry for the same stacks. The paper then uses the method to show that replacing the AlOx capping layer with naturally oxidized Cu doubles the damping-like field, from about 1.2 to 2.4 mT per $10^{11}$ A/m$^2$, a change it interprets as orbital torque from the Cu|CuOx interface rather than a thermal or magnon artifact.

Load-bearing premise

The extracted torque values assume that every non-torque contribution to the second-harmonic signal is captured by a single temperature-gradient term with two field-independent constants, and that magnon-related magnetoresistance never appears in the out-of-plane geometry.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single angular scan in the out-of-plane geometry can supply quantitative damping-like and field-like effective fields without measuring at multiple applied fields, simplifying SOT characterization.
  • The same measurement reports the thermoelectric voltages $T_{OOP}$ and $T_{IP}$ while extracting torques, so the thermal background is characterized rather than assumed away.
  • Because magnon-magnetoresistance terms are discarded in the out-of-plane geometry, torque values from this method should not need the magnon corrections required for in-plane harmonic data.
  • The measured twofold increase in damping-like field for Co/Pt/CuOx compared with Co/Pt/AlOx confirms that the Cu|CuOx interface adds an orbital-torque contribution on top of the Co|Pt spin Hall source.
  • The out-of-plane results match the in-plane geometry values for the same stacks, cross-validating both harmonic Hall approaches for these samples.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to apply the out-of-plane protocol to samples with large anomalous Nernst responses, such as Bi-based or topological-insulator films, where the angular separation of thermal and torque terms could make quantitative SOT extraction feasible.
  • The claim that magnon magnetoresistance is absent in the out-of-plane geometry could be tested directly by measuring a film series where the in-plane magnon signature is known to grow; if out-of-plane values stay flat while in-plane values drift, the claim is supported.
  • If the CuOx enhancement reflects a real orbital-current source, then a simple naturally oxidized copper cap could serve as an efficient orbital-torque injector, potentially reducing the heavy-metal thickness needed in SOT devices.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an out-of-plane (OOP) angular harmonic Hall measurement technique for extracting damping-like and field-like spin-orbit torque effective fields in in-plane magnetized samples. The authors derive the second-harmonic Hall voltage expression (Eq. (8)) that includes both torque terms and a two-component anomalous Nernst thermal background, then validate the method on Co(2)/Pt(4)/AlOx(3) and Co(2)/Pt(4)/CuOx(3) stacks. They report that the OOP geometry separates thermal effects from torques, requires no complete field sweep, and gives accurate DL/FL separation under favorable conditions. The measured damping-like fields show consistency with the in-plane geometry and corroborate a twofold enhancement in the CuOx-capped sample, attributed to orbital currents from the Cu|CuOx interface.

Significance. If validated, this would be a useful extension of harmonic Hall metrology: the analytical derivation is careful, the 1st-harmonic fits determine the magnetization direction self-consistently, the multi-field data allow scaling checks (1/(Hext+Hk) for DL, 1/Hext for FL), and the agreement between OOP and IP geometries is a genuine strength. The corroboration of the orbital-torque enhancement in CuOx-capped samples is also of interest. However, the quantitative extraction depends heavily on the assumption that all non-torque 2ω backgrounds are captured by a single anomalous-Nernst term with field-independent coefficients. The paper does not demonstrate the absence of magnon magnetoresistance or other thermoelectric backgrounds, and at high fields the DL and FL angular signatures become degenerate. The method is promising, but its error budget is not yet fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (8) and fitting description in experimental section] The quantitative extraction of HDL and HFL from V2ω rests on the assumption that all non-torque 2ω backgrounds are described by the single anomalous Nernst term I0α(TOOP cosθM + TIP sinθM) with field-independent TOOP and TIP. The statement that MMR 'should be discarded' because the injected angular momentum is always transverse to the magnetization is not demonstrated; current-induced magnon processes can produce θ-independent or field-dependent resistivity contributions rather than vanishing identically. Since the antisymmetric part of V2ω is fitted with HDL, HFL, and TOOP as free parameters, any unmodeled background with a similar angular dependence will be absorbed into the torque values. The authors should provide a quantitative bound on such backgrounds, for example by varying the field at fixed θM or by performing a control experiment with a non-magnetic stack.
  2. [High-field regime, Fig. 3(a) and text after Fig. 2] For Hext ≫ Hk, θM≈θH and the DL and FL terms in Eq. (8) have the same angular shape (both ∝ cosθH/Hext), so their separation is possible only through the prescribed RAHE/RPHE ratio and the thermal model. The authors themselves note that at 35–40 kOe the TOOP curve resembles the HDL signal and that the HDL extraction is unreliable there. The claim of 'greater accuracy in properly separating and quantifying' the two torque components should therefore be restricted to fields where Heff is sufficiently nonlinear, and the manuscript should specify the field window over which the separation is reliable.
  3. [Introduction, claim 'does not require a complete set of measurements at different magnetic fields'] The statement that the OOP approach 'does not require a complete set of measurements at different magnetic fields' is overstated. Although the angular dependence of Eq. (8) can in principle separate the terms at a single field, the presented extraction requires an accurate Hk value from fitting V1ω over multiple fields, and the validation shown in Fig. 3(a) uses data from the whole field window. The manuscript should state the minimal set of measurements needed for a standalone determination of HDL and HFL and demonstrate it with a single-field example; otherwise the claimed advantage over the IP geometry is not established.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Experimental section, near Eq. (3)] The sentence 'Eq. (3) requires the information from the 1st harmonic signal' is confusing because Eq. (3) directly gives ΔθM; the 1st harmonic is actually used to determine Hk and the θM(θH) relation. Please rephrase.
  2. [References] The reference list contains duplicates: Refs. 27 and 35 are the same paper (El Hamdi et al.), Refs. 34 and 36 are the same paper (Santos et al.), and Refs. 13 and 33 are the same paper (Lee et al.).
  3. [Fig. 2(a)] The linear fit of V2ω versus 1/(Hext+Hk) neglects the FL term, which scales as 1/Hext and is not strictly negligible at the lower fields included; the fit would benefit from a statement of the resulting systematic error or from a two-parameter fit.
  4. [Fig. 3] Figure 3 shows error bars described as variations, but no statistical uncertainties are given for the fitted parameters in Eq. (8); reporting standard errors or confidence intervals would strengthen the metrological claim.
  5. [Experimental section, sample description] There is a typo in the sample name 'Co(2)|Pt(4)|AlOx x(3)' in the experimental section; the extra 'x' should be removed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the OOP harmonic derivation is self-contained; the only self-citation is a non-load-bearing IP benchmark from Ref. 39.

full rationale

The analytical derivation of Eq. (8) is self-contained: it starts from the magnetic energy functional, solves Eq. (2) for the equilibrium angle, expands the Hall voltage to first order in the current-induced angular modulation, and adds a phenomenological anomalous-Nernst term with two independent coefficients. The torque fields HDL and HFL are then obtained by least-squares fits of the measured angular dependence of V2ω; no parameter is fitted to the claimed twofold enhancement and then renamed a prediction. The comparison with the in-plane geometry uses the same group's prior measurement (Ref. 39) as a benchmark, which is a self-citation, but the OOP data and the analytical model stand independently of that benchmark, and the agreement is consistency evidence rather than a derived consequence. The main limitations are physical assumptions, not circularity: the exclusion of magnon magnetoresistance in the OOP geometry is asserted rather than demonstrated, and the thermal background is modeled by a single field-independent anomalous-Nernst term, so unmodeled thermoelectric or MMR-like contributions could bias the extracted fields at high fields where the DL and FL angular signatures nearly degenerate. These are correctness risks that would be discussed in a referee report, but they do not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The free parameters are the fitted torque and thermal coefficients in the harmonic Hall model, plus the anisotropy field and Pt resistivity inherited from prior work. The key axioms are the coherent-rotation magnetic energy model and the single-term anomalous Nernst thermal model; the latter is the most fragile because the OOP geometry is asserted, not proven, to exclude MMR and other thermal terms. The orbital-current interpretation is an assumption carried over from the same group's earlier study.

free parameters (6)
  • Effective in-plane anisotropy field Hk = 9.5-10 kOe (from prior measurement, used as input)
    Used to solve Eq. (2) for theta_M and to fit V1omega and V2omega; the paper takes this value from previous work and does not refit it, but torque extraction depends on it.
  • Damping-like field HDL = 1.05 mT/(10^11 A/m^2) average for AlOx sample
    Fitted per field from Eq. (8) as a free parameter and averaged across fields; central extracted quantity.
  • Field-like field HFL = 0.74 mT/(10^11 A/m^2) average for AlOx sample
    Fitted from the PHE contribution in Eq. (8); reported as a free parameter at each field.
  • Out-of-plane thermal voltage TOOP = 5.40 uV for AlOx sample
    Fitted as a free parameter in the V2omega decomposition; assumed field-independent.
  • In-plane thermal voltage TIP = -0.38 uV for AlOx sample
    Isolated from the symmetric part of V2omega around the 90 degree polar angle; assumed field-independent.
  • Pt resistivity for shunting model = 25 uOhm.cm (from prior measurements)
    Used to convert measured torques to current-density-normalized efficiencies; the parallel-resistor model and this resistivity value come from Ref. 39 and affect the quoted torque efficiencies.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Stoner-Wohlfarth coherent rotation model with effective in-plane anisotropy field Hk (Eqs. 1-2)
    The entire angular response theta_M(theta_H) and the torque-induced oscillations derive from this energy functional.
  • domain assumption Harmonic Hall voltage is expanded to first order in the small SOT-induced magnetization oscillations; higher-order terms are neglected (Eqs. 5-8)
    Standard in harmonic Hall analysis; validity requires small torque angles.
  • ad hoc to paper The thermal contribution to V2omega is described solely by the anomalous Nernst effect with field-independent temperature-gradient components TOOP and TIP (Eq. 8)
    The paper assumes no other thermoelectric or MMR-like terms contaminate the OOP signal; asserted but not independently verified.
  • standard math Planar Hall resistance depends on magnetization as cos^2(theta_M) sin(2 phi_M) with phi_M = 0 in the OOP geometry (Eq. 5)
    Standard PHE tensor form.
  • domain assumption The orbital current interpretation for the CuOx sample follows the same-group prior work (Ref. 39); the present paper assumes this mechanism explains the enhanced torque.
    Used to attribute the twofold HDL increase to orbital current from Cu|CuOx, the central material conclusion.
  • domain assumption Current shunting in the Pt layer is estimated by a parallel-resistor model with Pt resistivity 25 uOhm.cm from prior measurements (Ref. 39).
    Used to normalize torques to current density in Pt; errors in shunting affect the absolute torque efficiencies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Alternative harmonic detection approach for quantitative determination of spin and orbital torques." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FGXD5RG7

@misc{pith2026250100403,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Alternative harmonic detection approach for quantitative determination of spin and orbital torques},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FGXD5RG7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00403}
}
read the original abstract

In this study, the spin-orbit torque (SOT) in light metal oxide systems is investigated using an experimental approach based on harmonic Hall voltage techniques in out-of-plane (OOP) angular geometry for samples with in-plane magnetic anisotropy. In parallel, an analytical derivation of this alternative OOP harmonic Hall detection geometry has been developed, followed by experimental validation to extract SOT effective fields. In addition, to accurately quantifying SOT, this method allows complete characterization of thermoelectric effects, opening promising avenues for accurate SOT characterization in related systems. In particular, this study corroborates the critical role of naturally oxidized copper interfaced with metallic Cu in the generation of orbital current in Co(2)|Pt(4)|CuOx(3), demonstrating a two-fold increase in damping-like torques compared to a reference sample with an oxidized Al capping layer. These findings offer promising directions for future research on the application aspect of non-equilibrium orbital angular momentum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.00403 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) and (b) are the values of torque efficiency and thermoelectric voltage (with injected current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Angular-dependent 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantitative analysis of vectorial torques in thin 3d Co ferromagnet using orbital-spin conversion

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In Co/Pt/Cu* stacks, damping-like torque has a spin channel from orbit-to-spin conversion in Pt at small Co thickness and a long-range orbital channel acting over several nanometers of Co at larger thickness.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  2. [2]

    merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  3. [3]

    merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  4. [4]

    + command, where the argument is the citation key mentioned above. +

  5. [6]

    author author I. M. \ Miron , author K. Garello , author G. Gaudin , author P.-J. \ Zermatten , author M. V. \ Costache , author S. Auffret , author S. Bandiera , author B. Rodmacq , author A. Schuhl , \ and\ author P. Gambardella ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 476 ,\ pages 189 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page 2011

  6. [7]

    Liu , author O

    author author L. Liu , author O. J. \ Lee , author T. J. \ Gudmundsen , author D. C. \ Ralph , \ and\ author R. A. \ Buhrman ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.096602 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 109 ,\ pages 096602 ( year 2012 a ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.096602

  7. [8]

    Liu , author C.-F

    author author L. Liu , author C.-F. \ Pai , author Y. Li , author H. W. \ Tseng , author D. C. \ Ralph , \ and\ author R. A. \ Buhrman ,\ 10.1126/science.1218197 journal journal Science \ volume 336 ,\ pages 555 ( year 2012 b ) NoStop

    doi:10.1126/science.1218197 2012

  8. [9]

    Manchon , author J

    author author A. Manchon , author J. Z Z elezn\'y , author I. M. \ Miron , author T. Jungwirth , author J. Sinova , author A. Thiaville , author K. Garello , \ and\ author P. Gambardella ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.035004 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 91 ,\ pages 035004 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.035004

Show all 49 references
  1. [10]

    Kateel , author V

    author author V. Kateel , author V. Krizakova , author S. Rao , author K. Cai , author M. Gupta , author M. G. \ Monteiro , author F. Yasin , author B. Sor \'e e , author J. De Boeck , author S. Couet , author P. Gambardella , author G. S. \ Kar , \ and\ author K. Garello ,\ 1...

    doi

  2. [11]

    Figueiredo-Prestes , author S

    author author N. Figueiredo-Prestes , author S. Krishnia , author S. Collin , author Y. Roussigné , author M. Belmeguenai , author S. M. \ Chérif , author J. Zarpellon , author D. H. \ Mosca , author H. Jaffrès , author L. Vila , author N. Reyren , \ and\ author J.-M. \ George...

    doi

  3. [12]

    Kim , author J

    author author J. Kim , author J. Sinha , author M. Hayashi , author M. Yamanouchi , author S. Fukami , author T. Suzuki , author S. Mitani , \ and\ author H. Ohno ,\ @noop journal journal Nature materials \ volume 12 ,\ pages 240 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  4. [13]

    Zhu , author T

    author author D. Zhu , author T. Zhang , author X. Fu , author R. Hao , author A. Hamzi c \' c , author H. Yang , author X. Zhang , author H. Zhang , author A. Du , author D. Xiong , author K. Shi , author S. Yan , author S. Zhang , author A. Fert , \ and\ author W. Zhao ,\ 10...

    doi

  5. [14]

    Grimaldi , author V

    author author E. Grimaldi , author V. Krizakova , author G. Sala , author F. Yasin , author S. Couet , author G. Sankar Kar , author K. Garello , \ and\ author P. Gambardella ,\ @noop journal journal Nature nanotechnology \ volume 15 ,\ pages 111 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  6. [15]

    Krishnia , author Y

    author author S. Krishnia , author Y. Sassi , author F. Ajejas , author N. Sebe , author N. Reyren , author S. Collin , author T. Denneulin , author A. Kovács , author R. E. \ Dunin-Borkowski , author A. Fert , author J.-M. \ George , author V. Cros , \ and\ author H. Jaffrès ...

    doi

  7. [16]

    Fan , author P

    author author Y. Fan , author P. Upadhyaya , author X. Kou , author M. Lang , author S. Takei , author Z. Wang , author J. Tang , author L. He , author L.-T. \ Chang , author M. Montazeri , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Nature materials \ volume 13 ,\ pages 699 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  8. [17]

    Hibino , author T

    author author Y. Hibino , author T. Taniguchi , author K. Yakushiji , author A. Fukushima , author H. Kubota , \ and\ author S. Yuasa ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 12 ,\ pages 6254 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  9. [18]

    Lee , author M.-G

    author author S. Lee , author M.-G. \ Kang , author D. Go , author D. Kim , author J.-H. \ Kang , author T. Lee , author G.-H. \ Lee , author J. Kang , author N. J. \ Lee , author Y. Mokrousov , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Communications Physics \ volume 4 ,\ pages 234 ( y...

    2021

  10. [19]

    Zhu , author L

    author author L. Zhu , author L. Zhu , \ and\ author R. A. \ Buhrman ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.107204 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 126 ,\ pages 107204 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  11. [20]

    Sinova , author S

    author author J. Sinova , author S. O. \ Valenzuela , author J. Wunderlich , author C. Back , \ and\ author T. Jungwirth ,\ @noop journal journal Reviews of modern physics \ volume 87 ,\ pages 1213 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  12. [21]

    author author Y. A. \ Bychkov \ and\ author \'E . I. \ Rashba ,\ @noop journal journal JETP lett \ volume 39 ,\ pages 78 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

    1984

  13. [22]

    author author V. M. \ Edelstein ,\ @noop journal journal Solid State Communications \ volume 73 ,\ pages 233 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

    1990

  14. [23]

    Mihai Miron , author G

    author author I. Mihai Miron , author G. Gaudin , author S. Auffret , author B. Rodmacq , author A. Schuhl , author S. Pizzini , author J. Vogel , \ and\ author P. Gambardella ,\ @noop journal journal Nature materials \ volume 9 ,\ pages 230 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  15. [24]

    Manchon , author H

    author author A. Manchon , author H. C. \ Koo , author J. Nitta , author S. M. \ Frolov , \ and\ author R. A. \ Duine ,\ @noop journal journal Nature materials \ volume 14 ,\ pages 871 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  16. [25]

    Garello , author I

    author author K. Garello , author I. M. \ Miron , author C. O. \ Avci , author F. Freimuth , author Y. Mokrousov , author S. Bl \"u gel , author S. Auffret , author O. Boulle , author G. Gaudin , \ and\ author P. Gambardella ,\ @noop journal journal Nature nanotechnology \ vol...

    2013

  17. [26]

    author author M. D. \ Stiles \ and\ author A. Zangwill ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.014407 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 66 ,\ pages 014407 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  18. [27]

    author author C. O. \ Avci , author K. Garello , author C. Nistor , author S. Godey , author B. Ballesteros , author A. Mugarza , author A. Barla , author M. Valvidares , author E. Pellegrin , author A. Ghosh , author I. M. \ Miron , author O. Boulle , author S. Auffret , auth...

    doi

  19. [28]

    Kim , author D

    author author J. Kim , author D. Go , author H. Tsai , author D. Jo , author K. Kondou , author H.-W. \ Lee , \ and\ author Y. Otani ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L020407 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 103 ,\ pages L020407 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  20. [29]

    \ Choi , author D

    author author Y.-G. \ Choi , author D. Jo , author K.-H. \ Ko , author D. Go , author K.-H. \ Kim , author H. G. \ Park , author C. Kim , author B.-C. \ Min , author G.-M. \ Choi , \ and\ author H.-W. \ Lee ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 619 ,\ pages 52 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  21. [30]

    Go , author D

    author author D. Go , author D. Jo , author C. Kim , \ and\ author H.-W. \ Lee ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 121 ,\ pages 086602 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  22. [31]

    \ Lee , author V

    author author K.-J. \ Lee , author V. Cros , \ and\ author H.-W. \ Lee ,\ 10.1038/s41563-024-01978-x journal journal Nature Materials \ volume 23 ,\ pages 1302 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  23. [32]

    El Hamdi , author J.-Y

    author author A. El Hamdi , author J.-Y. \ Chauleau , author M. Boselli , author C. Thibault , author C. Gorini , author A. Smogunov , author C. Barreteau , author S. Gariglio , author J.-M. \ Triscone , \ and\ author M. Viret ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 1...

    2023

  24. [33]

    Go , author D

    author author D. Go , author D. Jo , author T. Gao , author K. Ando , author S. Bl \"u gel , author H.-W. \ Lee , \ and\ author Y. Mokrousov ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 103 ,\ pages L121113 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  25. [34]

    Lyalin , author S

    author author I. Lyalin , author S. Alikhah , author M. Berritta , author P. M. \ Oppeneer , \ and\ author R. K. \ Kawakami ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.156702 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 131 ,\ pages 156702 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  26. [35]

    Hayashi \ and\ author K

    author author H. Hayashi \ and\ author K. Ando ,\ 10.1063/5.0170654 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 123 ,\ pages 172401 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  27. [36]

    Ding , author Z

    author author S. Ding , author Z. Liang , author D. Go , author C. Yun , author M. Xue , author Z. Liu , author S. Becker , author W. Yang , author H. Du , author C. Wang , author Y. Yang , author G. Jakob , author M. Kl\"aui , author Y. Mokrousov , \ and\ author J. Yang ,\ 10...

    doi

  28. [37]

    Ding , author A

    author author S. Ding , author A. Ross , author D. Go , author L. Baldrati , author Z. Ren , author F. Freimuth , author S. Becker , author F. Kammerbauer , author J. Yang , author G. Jakob , author Y. Mokrousov , \ and\ author M. Kl\"aui ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.177201 jour...

    doi

  29. [38]

    Lee , author M.-G

    author author S. Lee , author M.-G. \ Kang , author D. Go , author D. Kim , author J.-H. \ Kang , author T. Lee , author G.-H. \ Lee , author J. Kang , author N. J. \ Lee , author Y. Mokrousov , author S. Kim , author K.-J. \ Kim , author K.-J. \ Lee , \ and\ author B.-G. \ Pa...

    doi

  30. [40]

    author author A. E. \ Hamdi , author J.-Y. \ Chauleau , author M. Boselli , author C. Thibault , author C. Gorini , author A. Smogunov , author C. Barreteau , author S. Gariglio , author J.-M. \ Triscone , \ and\ author M. Viret ,\ 10.1038/s41567-023-02121-4 journal journal Na...

    doi

  31. [41]

    Santos , author J

    author author E. Santos , author J. E. \ Abr\ ao , author A. S. \ Vieira , author J. B. S. \ Mendes , author R. L. \ Rodr\' guez-Su\'arez , \ and\ author A. Azevedo ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.014420 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 109 ,\ pages 014420 ( year 2024 b ) NoStop

    doi

  32. [42]

    Ding , author M.-G

    author author S. Ding , author M.-G. \ Kang , author W. Legrand , \ and\ author P. Gambardella ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.236702 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 132 ,\ pages 236702 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  33. [43]

    Kim , author J

    author author J. Kim , author J. Uzuhashi , author M. Horio , author T. Senoo , author D. Go , author D. Jo , author T. Sumi , author T. Wada , author I. Matsuda , author T. Ohkubo , author S. Mitani , author H.-W. \ Lee , \ and\ author Y. Otani ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.L...

    doi

  34. [44]

    Krishnia , author B

    author author S. Krishnia , author B. Bony , author E. Rongione , author L. M. \ Vicente-Arche , author T. Denneulin , author A. Pezo , author Y. Lu , author R. E. \ Dunin-Borkowski , author S. Collin , author A. Fert , author J.-M. \ George , author N. Reyren , author V. Cros...

    doi

  35. [45]

    author author C. O. \ Avci , author K. Garello , author M. Gabureac , author A. Ghosh , author A. Fuhrer , author S. F. \ Alvarado , \ and\ author P. Gambardella ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.224427 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 90 ,\ pages 224427 ( year 2014 b ) NoStop

    doi

  36. [46]

    Noël , author R

    author author P. Noël , author R. Schlitz , author E. Karadža , author C.-H. \ Lambert , author L. Nessi , author F. Binda , \ and\ author P. Gambardella ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07991 title Nonlinear longitudinal and transverse magnetoresistances due to current-induced m...

    2024 arXiv

  37. [47]

    Noël , author E

    author author P. Noël , author E. Karadža , author R. Schlitz , author P. Welter , author C.-H. \ Lambert , author L. Nessi , author F. Binda , author C. L. \ Degen , \ and\ author P. Gambardella ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07999 title Estimation of spin-orbit torques in the...

    2024 arXiv

  38. [48]

    Yang , author H

    author author H. Yang , author H. Chen , author M. Tang , author S. Hu , \ and\ author X. Qiu ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.024427 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 102 ,\ pages 024427 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  39. [49]

    Hayashi , author J

    author author M. Hayashi , author J. Kim , author M. Yamanouchi , \ and\ author H. Ohno ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.144425 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 89 ,\ pages 144425 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  40. [50]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number orga...

    2010

  41. [51]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number orga...

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.