Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 86 references

Will You Be Aware? Eye Tracking-Based Modeling of Situational Awareness in Augmented Reality

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Eye-tracking data from a commercial AR headset predicts a user's situational awareness level with 83% accuracy, enabling gaze-based detection of cognitive tunneling.

desk verdict A careful AR-CPR study with a plausible gaze–SA link, but the headline accuracy can't be audited in the provided text, and the freeze-probe labels may be encoding the very gaze behavior the model sees. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.05025 v2 pith:FJSKFSW2 submitted 2025-08-07 cs.LG cs.HC

Zhehan Qu , Tianyi Hu , Christian Fronk , Maria Gorlatova This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LGcs.HC
keywords eyetrackingsituationalawarenessaugmentedrealitygraphneuralnetworkcognitivetunnelinggazeanalysisCPRguidancespatiotemporalgraphs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that eye-tracking signals from a head-mounted AR display contain enough information to infer a user's situational awareness during a dynamic, safety-critical task—specifically AR-guided CPR. Using a graph neural network that represents gaze events as spatiotemporal graphs, the authors report 83.0% accuracy (F1=81.0%) in classifying freeze-probe SA levels, beating feature-based machine learning and state-of-the-art time-series models. The analysis also identifies a concrete gaze signature of high SA: larger and faster saccades and less time spent fixating on virtual content. If this holds, AR guidance systems could continuously monitor attention and detect cognitive tunneling before it leads to missed hazards.

What carries the argument

FixGraphPool, a graph neural network that turns eye-tracking events into spatiotemporal graphs: fixations and saccades become nodes/edges carrying position, duration, and velocity attributes, and a graph-pooling layer aggregates them before classification. The graph structure preserves the order and geometry of gaze, which is what lets the model capture whether the user is scanning the environment or stuck on the virtual content.

What would settle it

Run the trained model on gaze windows from which the time segments around incident onset have been removed. If accuracy drops to near chance, the model is mainly reading incident detection rather than a general SA state. Alternatively, have new participants perform the same CPR task with the visual overlay but no staged incidents, and check whether the model still separates participants who later report high vs. low awareness.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that situational awareness in an AR guidance setting leaves a measurable trace in gaze dynamics, and that this trace can be learned by a graph neural network. In a user study with simulated bleeding, vomiting, and ambulance-arrival incidents during CPR, the authors find that participants with higher SA make saccades with greater amplitude and velocity and spend a smaller proportion of their fixation time on the virtual overlay. They then encode fixations and saccades as nodes and edges of a graph with spatial and temporal attributes, pool them with a GNN, and classify SA level from a short gaze window. The reported 83.0% classification accuracy indicates that the mod

Load-bearing premise

The freeze-probe SA labels are treated as a ground truth that is not already contained in the gaze features, but SA is scored largely by whether the participant noticed the incidents, and incident detection is directly visible as a gaze pattern, so the label and the features may share a causal source.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Gaze can serve as a real-time, passive SA sensor in AR: the model runs on the headset's eye-tracking stream and could flag when an operator's awareness drops.
  • The identified gaze signature—high saccadic amplitude/velocity, low virtual-fixation share—gives interface designers a measurable target for reducing cognitive tunneling.
  • Graph-based encoding of gaze events outperforms both handcrafted feature classifiers and raw time-series deep learning, suggesting the spatiotemporal structure of gaze carries the predictive signal.
  • The approach transfers in principle to other safety-critical AR tasks (e.g., first response, remote guidance) where unexpected events demand environmental vigilance.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 83% accuracy may partly reflect that SA labels are derived from whether the participant noticed staged incidents, and noticing is itself visible in the gaze stream (fixation on the incident, saccade away from the overlay). A stricter test would mask the gaze segments that coincide with incident onset before classification.
  • If the saccade-amplitude signature generalizes, it could support a lightweight 'SA index' computed from raw gaze statistics without any neural network, useful for low-power headsets.
  • The paper's freeze-probe protocol yields discrete SA labels; a continuous variant (e.g., rating awareness at random intervals) would let the same graph architecture output a moment-by-moment SA estimate, which is what an adaptive AR system would actually need.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes to model situational awareness (SA) during AR-guided CPR using eye-tracking data from a Magic Leap 2 headset. It describes the design of an AR CPR guidance app, a user study with three staged incidents (bleeding, vomiting, and a virtual ambulance), and a graph neural network model, FixGraphPool, that encodes gaze events as spatiotemporal graphs. The abstract reports 83.0% accuracy (F1=81.0%) for SA classification and states that higher SA is associated with larger saccadic amplitude/velocity and lower fixation proportion/frequency on virtual content. However, the provided manuscript does not include the evaluation, model, or results sections (Sections 4–7), so the central empirical claims cannot be audited from the text supplied.

Significance. If the claims hold, this would be a valuable demonstration that eye-tracking from a commercial AR headset can classify an operator's situational awareness in a dynamic safety-critical task, with direct implications for gaze-based cognitive-tunneling detection in AR guidance. The task design in Section 3 is thoughtful: incidents were selected with a certified CPR instructor, a pilot study informed the app, and the bleeding/vomiting releases were positioned to equate detection difficulty. The proposed FixGraphPool architecture is a reasonable domain-informed approach. However, the validity of the 83% accuracy figure depends on whether the SA labels are independent of the gaze features and whether the model generalizes across incident types, both of which are unresolved in the provided text.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / Sections 4–7] The core empirical claim—83.0% accuracy (F1=81.0%)—is stated in the abstract, but the provided manuscript contains no evaluation section, no model description beyond the name FixGraphPool, no feature-window definition, and no train/validation split details. Section 3.2 even references a Section 7 limitations discussion that is absent. Without these components, the headline accuracy cannot be verified, and baseline comparisons cannot be assessed. This is a load-bearing omission that must be remedied before the claims can be evaluated.
  2. [Section 3.3 / label-feature circularity] The SA labels appear to be assigned substantially from whether the participant noticed the staged incidents (freeze-probe observation/questionnaires). Noticing is directly manifest in eye movements: fixations on the blood/vomit/ambulance and saccades away from the AR overlay. Since FixGraphPool encodes exactly these gaze events, the model may be reconstructing the labeling process rather than predicting an independent SA construct. The paper should report the exact SA scoring rubric, separate label collection from gaze features, and demonstrate with a control analysis (e.g., hold out all windows where the incident is fixated) that accuracy does not collapse.
  3. [Section 3.3 / incident comparability] The three incidents are not perceptually symmetric. Bleeding and vomiting are physical releases positioned 21 cm from the compression point, while the ambulance is a virtual object approaching from 95 m at 6 m/s with an audible siren—a different modality, spatial scale, and salience profile. If the model is trained on per-incident windows, it can learn to identify which incident is present (or whether the participant's gaze happened to land on the incident) rather than a general SA state. A leave-one-incident-out evaluation, or at least reporting accuracy per incident, is necessary to support the general claim of SA classification.
  4. [Section 3.2 / freeze-probe protocol] The freeze-probe SA measurement procedure is not described in the provided sections. The paper mentions 'observation and questionnaires administered during freeze-probe events' but gives no details on the number of probes, their timing relative to incident onset, or the questionnaire items. Since the entire label construction depends on this protocol, its absence is a critical gap that prevents assessment of label reliability and of potential leakage from the labeling procedure into the gaze features.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title/header] The title contains odd spacing: 'Will Y ou Be Aware?' should be 'Will You Be Aware?'.
  2. [Copyright/front matter] The DOI placeholder 'xx.xxxx/TVCG.201x.xxxxxxx' is unresolved and should be completed or removed before publication.
  3. [Section 3.3 / Figure 2] The text refers to 'as illustrated in Fig. 2', but Figure 2 is not present in the provided text. Please verify the figure is included and legible.
  4. [Section 3.3 / incident implementation] The description of the ambulance incident states it 'would approach with a siren sound from the front-left' but does not specify whether the siren is spatialized or how its volume interacts with the CPR drumbeat at 108 BPM. This could affect detection difficulty and should be reported.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No demonstrated circularity: the SA label is a freeze-probe questionnaire/observation score, not a definitional restatement of gaze features; self-citations are background only.

full rationale

The paper's only strong claim is an empirical classification result (83% accuracy / F1 81%) for FixGraphPool on eye-tracking features. No equation or parameter is fitted to the target and renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing premise is justified exclusively by a self-citation. The abstract states that 'SA metrics were collected via observation and questionnaires administered during freeze-probe events'; although the concern that incident-noticing labels overlap with gaze features is a legitimate construct-validity threat, the paper does not define SA as 'looked at the incident.' Freeze-probe answers require comprehension beyond fixation, so the label is not identical to the gaze graph input by construction. The self-references ([22], [33], [45]) appear in related-work comparisons, not as uniqueness arguments or ansatz sources; the proposed FixGraphPool architecture is introduced in the paper, not imported from those citations. Section 3.2 acknowledges that 'limited design iteration may impact our findings, as discussed in Sec. 7,' and Section 3.3's attempt to equate the blood/vomit release points ('21 cm away from the compression point to maintain comparable detection difficulty') does not fully address the ambulance's different modality and scale; these are reporting/validity limitations, not circular reductions. The missing Sections 4-7 prevent auditing of the exact label rubric and data split, so a definitional reduction cannot be exhibited. Under the quote-and-reduction standard, no circular step is demonstrated.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the SA measurement chain: freeze-probe labels are treated as ground truth, gaze events are treated as clean reads of attention during vigorous motion, and the three incidents are treated as interchangeable probes of the same construct. Each link is assumed rather than evidenced in the visible text, and each is load-bearing for the 83% claim.

free parameters (3)
  • FixGraphPool model weights = unknown
    GNN weights are fitted to the study's freeze-probe SA labels; no external validation cohort is described in the available text.
  • Gaze event detection thresholds = not reported in visible text
    Fixation and saccade segmentation uses standard filters (Tobii I-VT, Salvucci and Goldberg [61,62]); the threshold values affect which events enter the graphs and are not stated in the visible text.
  • Graph construction window length and pooling hyperparameters = not reported
    The window over which gaze events are grouped into graphs, the number of GCN layers, hidden dimensions, and pooling ratio are design choices that live in the missing model section.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption SAGAT-style freeze-probe questioning yields valid, non-reactive measurement of SA.
    The SA ground truth is collected via observation and questionnaires at freeze-probe events while CPR is interrupted (abstract); the validity of transferring this aviation method to AR CPR is assumed.
  • domain assumption Endsley's three-level SA model (perception, comprehension, projection) applies to this CPR task.
    The framework [9] is adopted without adaptation for the dual task of continuous compressions plus environmental monitoring.
  • ad hoc to paper The three incidents are comparably salient and detectable.
    Sec. 3.3: blood and vomit release points are "21 cm away from the compression point to maintain comparable detection difficulty," while the ambulance is a 95 m distant virtual object with a siren; equal difficulty is assumed, not measured.
  • domain assumption Magic Leap 2 eye tracking remains reliable during vigorous physical motion (chest compressions).
    Gaze events are extracted during a dynamic motor task; no validation of tracking quality during compressions is described in the visible text.
invented entities (1)
  • FixGraphPool (spatiotemporal gaze-event graph model)
    purpose: Encodes fixations and saccades as graph nodes and edges over time to classify SA levels.
    The model is validated only on the study's own eye-tracking dataset; no external benchmark, pretrained checkpoint, or independent replication is provided, so its status as a general predictor rests on this single dataset.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Will You Be Aware? Eye Tracking-Based Modeling of Situational Awareness in Augmented Reality." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FJSKFSW2

@misc{pith2026250805025,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Will You Be Aware? Eye Tracking-Based Modeling of Situational Awareness in Augmented Reality},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FJSKFSW2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05025}
}
read the original abstract

Augmented Reality (AR) systems, while enhancing task performance through real-time guidance, pose risks of inducing cognitive tunneling-a hyperfocus on virtual content that compromises situational awareness (SA) in safety-critical scenarios. This paper investigates SA in AR-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), where responders must balance effective compressions with vigilance to unpredictable hazards (e.g., patient vomiting). We developed an AR app on a Magic Leap 2 that overlays real-time CPR feedback (compression depth and rate) and conducted a user study with simulated unexpected incidents (e.g., bleeding) to evaluate SA, in which SA metrics were collected via observation and questionnaires administered during freeze-probe events. Eye tracking analysis revealed that higher SA levels were associated with greater saccadic amplitude and velocity, and with reduced proportion and frequency of fixations on virtual content. To predict SA, we propose FixGraphPool, a graph neural network that structures gaze events (fixations, saccades) into spatiotemporal graphs, effectively capturing dynamic attentional patterns. Our model achieved 83.0% accuracy (F1=81.0%), outperforming feature-based machine learning and state-of-the-art time-series models by leveraging domain knowledge and spatial-temporal information encoded in ET data. These findings demonstrate the potential of eye tracking for SA modeling in AR and highlight its utility in designing AR systems that ensure user safety and situational awareness.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Multimodal aug- mented reality and subtle guidance for industrial assembly – a survey and ideation method,

    N. Tobiskov ´a, L. Malmsk ¨old, and T. Pederson, “Multimodal aug- mented reality and subtle guidance for industrial assembly – a survey and ideation method,” in Proceedings of HCII, 2022. 1

    2022

  2. [2]

    Neurolens: Aug- mented reality-based contextual guidance through surgical tool track- ing in neurosurgery,

    S. Eom, D. Sykes, S. Rahimpour, and M. Gorlatova, “Neurolens: Aug- mented reality-based contextual guidance through surgical tool track- ing in neurosurgery,” inProceedings of IEEE ISMAR, 2022. 1

    2022

  3. [3]

    Virtual and augmented reality in the disaster management technol- ogy: a literature review of the past 11 years,

    S. Khanal, U. S. Medasetti, M. Mashal, B. Savage, and R. Khadka, “Virtual and augmented reality in the disaster management technol- ogy: a literature review of the past 11 years,” Frontiers in Virtual Re- ality, vol. 3, p. 843195, 2022. 1, 2

    2022

  4. [4]

    Performance evaluation of AR/VR training technologies for EMS first responders,

    G. Koutitas, S. Smith, and G. Lawrence, “Performance evaluation of AR/VR training technologies for EMS first responders,” Virtual Real- ity, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 83–94, 2021. 1, 2

    2021

  5. [5]

    The art of timing: Effects of AR guidance timing on speed control,

    J. Ceyssens, B. van Deurzen, G. R. Ruiz, K. Luyten, and F. Di Fiore, “The art of timing: Effects of AR guidance timing on speed control,” in Proceedings of IEEE ISMAR, 2024. 1

    2024

  6. [6]

    Exploring the design space of optical see-through AR head-mounted displays to support first re- sponders in the field,

    K. Zhang, B. R. Cochran, R. Chen, L. Hartung, B. Sprecher, R. Tredin- nick, K. Ponto, S. Banerjee, and Y . Zhao, “Exploring the design space of optical see-through AR head-mounted displays to support first re- sponders in the field,” in Proceedings of ACM CHI, 2024. 1

    2024

  7. [7]

    XaiR: An XR platform that inte- grates large language models with the physical world,

    S. Srinidhi, E. Lu, and A. Rowe, “XaiR: An XR platform that inte- grates large language models with the physical world,” inProceedings of IEEE ISMAR, 2024. 1

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Multiple resources and mental workload,

    C. D. Wickens, “Multiple resources and mental workload,” Human Factors, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 449–455, 2008. 1

    work page 2008

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems,

    M. R. Endsley, “Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems,” Human Factors, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 32–64, 1995. 1, 2

    1995

  2. [10]

    White paper on adaptive situational aware- ness enhancing augmented reality interface design on first responders in rescue tasks,

    I. Azpiroz, I. G. Olaizola, X. Oregui, A. F. Garc´ıa, V . Ruiz, B. Larraga- Garc´ıa, and ´A. Guti´errez, “White paper on adaptive situational aware- ness enhancing augmented reality interface design on first responders in rescue tasks,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 18, p. 82...

    2024

  3. [11]

    Comparison of augmented reality-assisted and instructor-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a simulated randomized controlled pi- lot trial,

    L. Hou, X. Dong, K. Li, C. Yang, Y . Yu, X. Jin, and S. Shang, “Comparison of augmented reality-assisted and instructor-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a simulated randomized controlled pi- lot trial,” Clinical Simulation in Nursing, vol. 68, pp. 9–18, 2022. 2, 3

    2022

  4. [12]

    Effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality for car- diopulmonary resuscitation training: a systematic review and meta- analysis,

    R. Sun, Y . Wang, Q. Wu, S. Wang, X. Liu, P. Wang, Y . He, and H. Zheng, “Effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality for car- diopulmonary resuscitation training: a systematic review and meta- analysis,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 730, 2024. 2

    2024

  5. [13]

    Co-designing aug- mented reality tools for high-stakes clinical teamwork,

    A. Taylor, T. Tanjim, H. Cao, J. B. Nicoly, J. I. Segal, J. S. George, S. Kim, K. Ching, F. R. Ortega, and H. R. Lee, “Co-designing aug- mented reality tools for high-stakes clinical teamwork,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17295, 2025. 2

    2025

  6. [14]

    Digital multitasking and hyperactivity: unveiling the hidden costs to brain health,

    M. K. Hasan, “Digital multitasking and hyperactivity: unveiling the hidden costs to brain health,”Annals of Medicine and Surgery, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 6371–6373, 2024. 2

    2024

  7. [15]

    Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT),

    M. R. Endsley, “Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT),” inProceedings of IEEE NAECON, 1988. 2, 4

    1988

  8. [16]

    Situational awareness rating technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew systems design,

    R. M. Taylor, “Situational awareness rating technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew systems design,” in Situational Awareness. Routledge, 2017, pp. 111–128. 2, 4

    2017

  9. [17]

    Clas- sification of internal and external distractions in an educational VR environment using multimodal features,

    S. M. Asish, A. K. Kulshreshth, C. W. Borst, and S. Sutradhar, “Clas- sification of internal and external distractions in an educational VR environment using multimodal features,” IEEE Transactions on Visu- alization and Computer Graphics, 2024. 2

    2024

  10. [18]

    Automatic gaze-based detection of mind wandering with metacognitive awareness,

    R. Bixler and S. D’Mello, “Automatic gaze-based detection of mind wandering with metacognitive awareness,” in Proceedings of ACM UMAP, 2015. 2, 3

    2015

  11. [19]

    2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care,

    A. H. Association, “2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care,” Circulation, vol. 142, pp. S337–S357, 2020. 2, 3

    2020

  12. [20]

    The value of songs for teaching and learning cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compe- tencies: a systematic review,

    J. L. Pellegrino, J. Vance, and N. Asselin, “The value of songs for teaching and learning cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compe- tencies: a systematic review,”Cureus, vol. 13, no. 5, 2021. 2, 3

    2021

  13. [21]

    Predicting locomotion intention using eye movements and EEG with LSTM and Transformers,

    G. Bremer and M. Lappe, “Predicting locomotion intention using eye movements and EEG with LSTM and Transformers,” in Proceedings of IEEE ISMAR, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  14. [22]

    GazeGraph: Graph- based few-shot cognitive context sensing from human visual behav- ior,

    G. Lan, B. Heit, T. Scargill, and M. Gorlatova, “GazeGraph: Graph- based few-shot cognitive context sensing from human visual behav- ior,” in Proceedings of ACM SenSys, 2020. 2, 3, 7

    2020

  15. [23]

    eSEE-d: Emo- tional state estimation based on eye-tracking dataset,

    V . Skaramagkas, E. Ktistakis, D. Manousos, E. Kazantzaki, N. S. Tachos, E. Tripoliti, D. I. Fotiadis, and M. Tsiknakis, “eSEE-d: Emo- tional state estimation based on eye-tracking dataset,”Brain Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 589, 2023. 2, 3

    2023

  16. [24]

    Edge contraction pooling for graph neural networks,

    F. Diehl, “Edge contraction pooling for graph neural networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.10990, 2019. 2, 8

    1905 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Situational awareness: Tech- niques, challenges, and prospects,

    A. Munir, A. Aved, and E. Blasch, “Situational awareness: Tech- niques, challenges, and prospects,” AI, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 55–77, 2022. 2

    2022

  18. [26]

    Situation awareness in aviation systems,

    M. R. Endsley et al., “Situation awareness in aviation systems,”Hand- book of Aviation Human Factors, vol. 11, pp. 257–276, 1999. 2

    1999

  19. [27]

    An emergency response model to- ward situational awareness improvement,

    C. Sapateiro and P. Antunes, “An emergency response model to- ward situational awareness improvement,” inProceedings of ISCRAM,

  20. [28]

    Technologies enabling situational aware- ness during disaster response: a systematic review,

    T. Kedia, J. Ratcliff, M. O’Connor, S. Oluic, M. Rose, J. Freeman, and K. Rainwater-Lovett, “Technologies enabling situational aware- ness during disaster response: a systematic review,”Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 341–359, 2022. 2

    2022

  21. [29]

    Analytic review of using augmented reality for situational awareness,

    J. Woodward and J. Ruiz, “Analytic review of using augmented reality for situational awareness,” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 2166–2183, 2022. 2

    2022

  22. [30]

    A study of the influence of AR on the perception, comprehension and projection levels of situ- ation awareness,

    C. Truong-Alli ´e, M. Herbeth, and A. Paljic, “A study of the influence of AR on the perception, comprehension and projection levels of situ- ation awareness,” in Proceedings of IEEE VR, 2023. 2, 4

    2023

  23. [31]

    Situational aware- ness prediction for remote tower controllers based on eye-tracking and heart rate variability data,

    W. Pan, R. Liang, Y . Wang, D. Song, and Z. Yin, “Situational aware- ness prediction for remote tower controllers based on eye-tracking and heart rate variability data,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 7, p. 2052, 2025. 2

  24. [32]

    Assessing distraction potential of aug- mented reality head-up displays for vehicle drivers,

    H. Kim and J. L. Gabbard, “Assessing distraction potential of aug- mented reality head-up displays for vehicle drivers,” Human Factors, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 852–865, 2022. 2

    2022

  25. [33]

    ‘Looking’ into attention patterns in extended reality: An eye tracking-based study,

    Z. Qu, R. Byrne, and M. Gorlatova, “‘Looking’ into attention patterns in extended reality: An eye tracking-based study,” in Proceedings of IEEE ISMAR, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  26. [34]

    Inattentional blindness increased with augmented real- ity surgical navigation,

    B. J. Dixon, M. J. Daly, H. H. Chan, A. Vescan, I. J. Witterick, and J. C. Irish, “Inattentional blindness increased with augmented real- ity surgical navigation,” American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy , vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 433–437, 2014. 2

    2014

  27. [35]

    Impact of task on attentional tunneling in handheld augmented real- ity,

    B. V . Syiem, R. M. Kelly, J. Goncalves, E. Velloso, and T. Dingler, “Impact of task on attentional tunneling in handheld augmented real- ity,” inProceedings of ACM CHI, 2021. 2

    2021

  28. [36]

    Applica- tions of augmented reality for prehospital emergency care: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials,

    R. E. Harari, S. L. Schulwolf, P. Borges, H. Salmani, F. Hosseini, S. K. Bailey, B. Quach, E. Nohelty, S. Park, Y . Vermaet al., “Applica- tions of augmented reality for prehospital emergency care: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials,” JMIR XR and Spatial Com- pu...

    2025

  29. [37]

    Adherence to AHA guidelines when adapted for augmented reality glasses for assisted pediatric car- diopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial,

    J. N. Siebert, F. Ehrler, A. Gervaix, K. Haddad, L. Lacroix, P. Schrurs, A. Sahin, C. Lovis, and S. Manzano, “Adherence to AHA guidelines when adapted for augmented reality glasses for assisted pediatric car- diopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial,”Journal o...

    2017

  30. [38]

    Smart glasses: A new tool for assessing the number of patients in mass-casualty incidents,

    K. Apiratwarakul, L. W. Cheung, S. Tiamkao, P. Phungoen, K. Tien- tanopajai, W. Taweepworadej, W. Kanarkard, and K. Ienghong, “Smart glasses: A new tool for assessing the number of patients in mass-casualty incidents,” Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 480...

    2022

  31. [39]

    EMSAssist: An end-to-end mobile voice assistant at the edge for emergency medical services,

    L. Jin, T. Liu, A. Haroon, R. Stoleru, M. Middleton, Z. Zhu, and T. Chaspari, “EMSAssist: An end-to-end mobile voice assistant at the edge for emergency medical services,” in Proceedings of ACM Mo- biSys, 2023. 2

    2023

  32. [40]

    Real-time multimodal cognitive assistant for emergency medical services,

    K. Weerasinghe, S. Janapati, X. Ge, S. Kim, S. Iyer, J. A. Stankovic, and H. Alemzadeh, “Real-time multimodal cognitive assistant for emergency medical services,” in Proceeding of IEEE/ACM IoTDI ,

  33. [41]

    Emergency response using HoloLens for building evac- uation,

    S. Sharma, S. T. Bodempudi, D. Scribner, J. Grynovicki, and P. Grazaitis, “Emergency response using HoloLens for building evac- uation,” in Proceedings of VAMR, 2019. 2

    2019

  34. [42]

    Collington, J

    D. Collington, J. Doswell, J. Johnson, M. Messam, S. Salaam, and A. Boykin, “The pervasive rapid E-preparedness augmented reality environment (PREPARE) E-learning intervention for HAZWOPER 10 © 2025 IEEE. This is the author’s version of the article that has been published in t...

    2025

  35. [43]

    Classification of attentional tun- neling through behavioral indices,

    S. W. Kortschot and G. A. Jamieson, “Classification of attentional tun- neling through behavioral indices,”Human Factors, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 973–986, 2020. 3

    2020

  36. [44]

    CAPturAR: An augmented reality tool for authoring human-involved context-aware applications,

    T. Wang, X. Qian, F. He, X. Hu, K. Huo, Y . Cao, and K. Ramani, “CAPturAR: An augmented reality tool for authoring human-involved context-aware applications,” in Proceedings of ACM UIST, 2020. 3

    2020

  37. [45]

    Demo: Catch my eye: Gaze- based activity recognition in an augmented reality art gallery,

    T. Scargill, G. Lan, and M. Gorlatova, “Demo: Catch my eye: Gaze- based activity recognition in an augmented reality art gallery,” inPro- ceedings of IEEE IPSN, 2022. 3

    2022

  38. [46]

    Eyes on me: Investigating the role and influence of eye-tracking data on user modeling in virtual reality,

    D. Jeong, M. Jeong, U. Yang, and K. Han, “Eyes on me: Investigating the role and influence of eye-tracking data on user modeling in virtual reality,”PLOS One, vol. 17, no. 12, p. e0278970, 2022. 3

    2022

  39. [47]

    Student engagement de- tection using emotion analysis, eye tracking and head movement with machine learning,

    P. Sharma, S. Joshi, S. Gautam, S. Maharjan, S. R. Khanal, M. C. Reis, J. Barroso, and V . M. de Jesus Filipe, “Student engagement de- tection using emotion analysis, eye tracking and head movement with machine learning,” in Proceedings of Springer TECH-EDU, 2022. 3

    2022

  40. [48]

    Imaging time series of eye tracking data to classify atten- tional states,

    L.-M. V ortmann, J. Knychalla, S. Annerer-Walcher, M. Benedek, and F. Putze, “Imaging time series of eye tracking data to classify atten- tional states,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 15, p. 664490, 2021. 3

    2021

  41. [49]

    Understanding human gaze communication by spatio-temporal graph reasoning,

    L. Fan, W. Wang, S. Huang, X. Tang, and S.-C. Zhu, “Understanding human gaze communication by spatio-temporal graph reasoning,” in Proceedings of IEEE/CVF ICCV, 2019. 3

    2019

  42. [50]

    Attentional tunneling and task management in synthetic vision displays,

    C. D. Wickens and A. L. Alexander, “Attentional tunneling and task management in synthetic vision displays,” The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 182–199, 2009. 3

    2009

  43. [51]

    A pilot study of CPR quality comparing an augmented reality ap- plication vs. a standard audio-visual feedback manikin,

    M. Leary, S. K. McGovern, S. Balian, B. S. Abella, and A. L. Blewer, “A pilot study of CPR quality comparing an augmented reality ap- plication vs. a standard audio-visual feedback manikin,” Frontiers in Digital Health, vol. 2, p. 1, 2020. 3

    2020

  44. [52]

    Optimizing in-contact force plan- ning in robotic ultrasound with augmented reality visualization tech- niques,

    T. Song, U. Eck, and N. Navab, “Optimizing in-contact force plan- ning in robotic ultrasound with augmented reality visualization tech- niques,” in Proceedings of IEEE ISMAR, 2024. 3

    2024

  45. [53]

    MSK-TIM: A telerobotic ultrasound system for assessing the musculoskeletal system,

    Z. Ochitwa, R. Fotouhi, S. J. Adams, A. P. Noguera Cundar, and H. Obaid, “MSK-TIM: A telerobotic ultrasound system for assessing the musculoskeletal system,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 7, p. 2368, 2024. 3

    2024

  46. [54]

    C. D. Wickens, J. S. McCarley, and R. S. Gutzwiller,Applied Attention Theory. CRC press, 2022. 3

    2022

  47. [55]

    Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control

    D. Derryberry and M. A. Reed, “Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control.” Journal of abnormal psychol- ogy, vol. 111, no. 2, p. 225, 2002. 4

    2002

  48. [56]

    Nature and measurement of attention control,

    A. P. Burgoyne, J. S. Tsukahara, C. A. Mashburn, R. Pak, and R. W. Engle, “Nature and measurement of attention control,” Journal of Ex- perimental Psychology: General, vol. 152, no. 8, p. 2369, 2023. 4

    2023

  49. [57]

    The development of a short domain-general measure of working memory capacity,

    F. L. Oswald, S. T. McAbee, T. S. Redick, and D. Z. Hambrick, “The development of a short domain-general measure of working memory capacity,”Behavior Research Methods, vol. 47, pp. 1343–1355, 2015. 4

    2015

  50. [58]

    An easy way to improve scoring of memory span tasks: The edit distance, beyond ‘correct recall in the correct serial posi- tion’,

    C. Gonthier, “An easy way to improve scoring of memory span tasks: The edit distance, beyond ‘correct recall in the correct serial posi- tion’,” Behavior Research Methods , vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 2021–2036,

    2021

  51. [59]

    A neuroergonomics approach to mental workload, engagement and human performance,

    F. Dehais, A. Lafont, R. Roy, and S. Fairclough, “A neuroergonomics approach to mental workload, engagement and human performance,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 14, p. 268, 2020. 5

    2020

  52. [60]

    Filtering on the go: Effect of filters on gaze pointing accuracy during physical locomotion in extended reality,

    P. Manakhov, L. Sidenmark, K. Pfeuffer, and H. Gellersen, “Filtering on the go: Effect of filters on gaze pointing accuracy during physical locomotion in extended reality,” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2024. 5

    2024

  53. [61]

    Identifying fixations and sac- cades in eye-tracking protocols,

    D. D. Salvucci and J. H. Goldberg, “Identifying fixations and sac- cades in eye-tracking protocols,” in Proceedings of ACM ETRA Ad- junct, 2000. 5

    2000

  54. [62]

    The Tobii I-VT fixation filter,

    A. Olsen, “The Tobii I-VT fixation filter,” Tobii Technology, vol. 21, pp. 4–19, 2012. 5

    2012

  55. [63]

    Development of eye- movement control,

    B. Luna, K. Velanova, and C. F. Geier, “Development of eye- movement control,” Brain and Cognition, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 293–308,

  56. [64]

    The upper limit of human smooth pursuit velocity,

    C. H. Meyer, A. G. Lasker, and D. A. Robinson, “The upper limit of human smooth pursuit velocity,” Vision Research, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 561–563, 1985. 5

    1985

  57. [65]

    Consistent chronostasis effects across saccade categories imply a subcortical ef- ferent trigger,

    K. Yarrow, H. Johnson, P. Haggard, and J. C. Rothwell, “Consistent chronostasis effects across saccade categories imply a subcortical ef- ferent trigger,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 839–847, 2004. 5

    2004

  58. [66]

    Assessing perceptual load and cognitive load by fixation-related information of eye move- ments,

    J.-C. Liu, K.-A. Li, S.-L. Yeh, and S.-Y . Chien, “Assessing perceptual load and cognitive load by fixation-related information of eye move- ments,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 3, p. 1187, 2022. 6

    2022

  59. [67]

    Saccade metrics re- flect decision-making dynamics during urgent choices,

    J. A. Seideman, T. R. Stanford, and E. Salinas, “Saccade metrics re- flect decision-making dynamics during urgent choices,” Nature Com- munications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2907, 2018. 6

    2018

  60. [68]

    Spa- tiotemporal content of saccade transients,

    N. Mostofi, Z. Zhao, J. Intoy, M. Boi, J. D. Victor, and M. Rucci, “Spa- tiotemporal content of saccade transients,” Current Biology, vol. 30, no. 20, pp. 3999–4008, 2020. 6

    2020

  61. [69]

    The effect cognitive load has on eye blinking,

    H. Ledger, “The effect cognitive load has on eye blinking,” The Ply- mouth Student Scientist, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 206–223, 2013. 6

    2013

  62. [70]

    Pupillometry as a mea- sure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults,

    T. Piquado, D. Isaacowitz, and A. Wingfield, “Pupillometry as a mea- sure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults,” Psychophysiol- ogy, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 560–569, 2010. 6

    2010

  63. [71]

    Fixation duration surpasses pupil size as a measure of memory load in free viewing,

    R. N. Meghanathan, C. van Leeuwen, and A. R. Nikolaev, “Fixation duration surpasses pupil size as a measure of memory load in free viewing,” Frontiers in human neuroscience, vol. 8, p. 1063, 2015. 6

    2015

  64. [72]

    E2GCL: Efficient and expres- sive contrastive learning on graph neural networks,

    H. Li, S. Di, L. Chen, and X. Zhou, “E2GCL: Efficient and expres- sive contrastive learning on graph neural networks,” inProceedings of IEEE ICDE, 2024. 7

    2024

  65. [73]

    Pupillometry: Psychology, physiology, and function,

    S. Math ˆot, “Pupillometry: Psychology, physiology, and function,” Journal of Cognition, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 16, 2018. 7

    2018

  66. [74]

    Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks,

    T. N. Kipf and M. Welling, “Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907, 2016. 8

    2016 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Counteracting data bias and class im- balance—towards a useful and reliable retinal disease recognition sys- tem,

    A. R. Chłopowiec, K. Karanowski, T. Skrzypczak, M. Grzesiuk, A. B. Chłopowiec, and M. Tabakov, “Counteracting data bias and class im- balance—towards a useful and reliable retinal disease recognition sys- tem,” Diagnostics, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 1904, 2023. 8

    1904

  68. [76]

    Comparison of machine learning methods for classification of alexithymia in individ- uals with and without autism from eye-tracking data,

    F. Ilgin, M. A. Witherow, and K. M. Iftekharuddin, “Comparison of machine learning methods for classification of alexithymia in individ- uals with and without autism from eye-tracking data,” in Proceedings of SPIE Applications of Machine Learning, 2023. 8

    2023

  69. [77]

    TSMixer: Lightweight MLP-mixer model for multivariate time se- ries forecasting,

    V . Ekambaram, A. Jati, N. Nguyen, P. Sinthong, and J. Kalagnanam, “TSMixer: Lightweight MLP-mixer model for multivariate time se- ries forecasting,” in Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD, 2023. 8

    2023

  70. [78]

    Fast graph representation learning with PyTorch Geometric,

    M. Fey and J. E. Lenssen, “Fast graph representation learning with PyTorch Geometric,” in ICLR Workshop on Representation Learning on Graphs and Manifolds, 2019. 8

    2019

  71. [79]

    Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python,

    F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V . Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V . Dubourg, J. Van- derplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay, “Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python,” Journal of Machine Le...

    2011

  72. [80]

    Design- ing critical and secondary information in augmented reality headsets for situational awareness,

    J. Woodward, J. Smith, I. Wang, S. Cuenca, and J. Ruiz, “Design- ing critical and secondary information in augmented reality headsets for situational awareness,” Journal of Engineering Research and Sci- ences, vol. 2, no. 3, 2023. 9

    2023

  73. [81]

    Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task,

    D. Bowers and K. M. Heilman, “Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 18, no. 4-5, pp. 491–498, 1980. 9

    1980

  74. [82]

    Effects of visual, auditory, and tactile navigation cues on navigation performance, situation awareness, and mental work- load,

    B. M. Davis, “Effects of visual, auditory, and tactile navigation cues on navigation performance, situation awareness, and mental work- load,” Army Res. Lab., Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, Rep. ARL- TR-4022, 2007. 9

    2007

  75. [83]

    Kiesel, L

    A. Kiesel, L. Johannsen, I. Koch, and H. M ¨uller, Handbook of human multitasking. Springer, 2022. 9

    2022

  76. [84]

    Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking,

    D. M. Sanbonmatsu, D. L. Strayer, N. Medeiros-Ward, and J. M. Watson, “Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking,” PLOS One, vol. 8, no. 1, p. e54402, 2013. 9

    2013

  77. [85]

    GazeBa- seVR, a large-scale, longitudinal, binocular eye-tracking dataset col- lected in virtual reality,

    D. Lohr, S. Aziz, L. Friedman, and O. V . Komogortsev, “GazeBa- seVR, a large-scale, longitudinal, binocular eye-tracking dataset col- lected in virtual reality,” Scientific Data, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 177, 2023. 9

    2023

  78. [86]

    Reading recognition in the wild,

    C. Yang, S. Alam, S. I. Siam, M. J. Proulx, L. Mathias, K. Somasun- daram, L. Pesqueira, J. Fort, S. Sheriffdeen, O. Parkhiet al., “Reading recognition in the wild,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.24848, 2025. 9 11

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.