Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Structural and helix reversal defects of carbon nanosprings

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that carbon nanosprings respond to compression, bending, and twisting by forming structural defects—cracks, folds, and localized helix-reversal domain walls—and that their axial thermal expansion coefficient reaches about

desk verdict Systematic MD study of nanospring defects with a solid helix-reversal result, undermined by unsupported 'fracture' claims from a non-reactive force field. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.04490 v1 pith:FKBTCGV6 submitted 2025-08-06 cond-mat.mes-hall

Alexander V. Savin , Elena A. Korznikova , Sergey V. Dmitriev This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords carbonnanospringgraphenehelicoidspiralnanoribbonhelixreversaldefectmoleculardynamicsbendingtwistingthermalexpansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Carbon nanosprings, helical macromolecules built from coronene or kekulene units, are shown by molecular dynamics to have a rich defect landscape beyond their previously studied stretching behavior. Under axial compression they first buckle laterally like a hinged rod, then crack; under bending, irreversible folds form that are stabilized by van der Waals attractions between the two halves; under twisting beyond a critical angle, a localized helix-reversal defect nucleates and separates regions of opposite chirality. The same simulations find a large axial thermal expansion coefficient $\alpha \approx 5 \times 10^{-5} \, \mathrm{K}^{-1}$, higher than for typical metals and alloys, which the paper attributes to the soft anharmonicity of van der Waals interactions between coils. A sympathetic reader would care because these defects set limits on nanospring reliability and suggest new functions—sensors, switches, and chirality-controlled devices—from a single molecular spring.

What carries the argument

The nanospring is a single-walled helical macromolecule with a fixed axial pitch $\Delta z \approx 0.58$ \AA{} and angular pitch $\Delta\phi \approx 61^{\circ}$, modeled as a chain of structural units interacting through valence, torsion, and van der Waals (Lennard-Jones) terms. The load-bearing elements are the inter-coil Lennard-Jones interactions: their soft anharmonicity drives the thermal expansion and determines the energy landscape for folding and helix reversal. The helix-reversal defect itself is a localized domain wall that costs an energy $E_d$ (e.g., 1.8–12.4 eV depending on ladder width) and sets the two halves at an angle $\phi_d$, so the defect energy and mobility control the

What would settle it

Run the same compression and twist protocols with a reactive many-body carbon potential such as AIREBO and compare the crack locations, critical twist angles, and helix-reversal defect energies; any significant difference would falsify the paper's assertion that the results do not depend on the force field.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Depending on whether the nanospring has an inner channel (l-kekulene ribbons) or is a closed helicoid (l-coronene), axial compression produces Euler buckling into a half-wave sine shape, then one or several transverse cracks; bending produces either a single crack or a folded state whose stability grows with spring length because van der Waals energy scales with $L$ whereas bending energy does not; twisting in the 'untwisting' direction produces a sharp energy drop at a critical angle, where a helix-reversal defect appears that separates left- and right-handed sections. The defect energy and the kink angle between the two halves are tabulated for several ribbon widths. The paper further repo

Load-bearing premise

The paper's defect and fracture results rest on the assumption that the chosen empirical force field, which is never compared against a reactive potential, faithfully describes bond breaking and large-deformation behavior, and that the conclusions are therefore independent of the force field.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Because twisting produces a mobile helix-reversal defect that can sweep the entire nanospring into the opposite handedness, a nanospring can be switched between two chiral states by an applied twist, akin to a mechanical chirality switch.
  • The length-dependent stability of folded states (van der Waals energy grows with $L$, bending energy does not) implies a critical spring length above which folding after bending is permanent and below which the spring recovers.
  • The axial thermal expansion coefficient $\alpha \approx 5\times10^{-5}\,\mathrm{K}^{-1}$, higher than many metals and alloys, means nanosprings are candidates for thermomechanical sensors working over hundreds of kelvin.
  • Nanosprings with an inner channel (kekulene) crack at only one site under compression, while channel-free helicoids (coronene) crack at multiple sites, so channel geometry controls failure localization.
  • Rapid relaxation of a highly stretched nanospring in a vacuum creates pairs of helix-reversal defects and a fracture, while relaxation in a viscous medium suppresses defect formation—so the environment controls defect production.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The helix-reversal defect is structurally analogous to a soliton domain wall in a one-dimensional chiral order; the same twist protocol might be used to write, move, and erase such walls repeatedly, enabling a single-molecule mechanical memory element.
  • At $\alpha \approx 5\times10^{-5}\,\mathrm{K}^{-1}$, a temperature change of about 200 K would produce a relative length change of roughly 1%, which could be exploited as a mechanical actuator or a temperature-sensitive resonator.
  • The paper's claim that the force field type does not matter is untested against a reactive potential; a comparative AIREBO simulation could reveal that the crack patterns and defect energies are artifacts of the non-reactive model.
  • The tabulated defect energies increase with ribbon width (from $l=2$ to $l=5$), suggesting the chiral-switching barrier can be tuned by molecular design, motivating a future study of defect mobility versus temperature and width.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper uses molecular dynamics simulations to study the mechanical response of two families of carbon nanosprings (spiral kekulene nanoribbons and coronene-based graphene helicoids) under axial compression, bending, and twisting, and it also computes the axial thermal expansion coefficient. The central qualitative findings are that compression leads to buckling and the formation of localized ``transverse crack''-like structural defects, bending beyond a critical force produces stably folded states, and twisting in the unwinding direction creates localized helix-reversal defects that separate regions of opposite chirality. The reported axial thermal expansion coefficient is about 5×10^-5 K^-1, which is claimed to be higher than that of many metals and alloys. The paper presents critical strains, critical forces, defect energies, and reversal-defect angles for several molecular sizes, and it demonstrates defect formation during rapid relaxation of a highly stretched nanospring.

Significance. If the results are taken at face value, the paper provides a useful qualitative map of deformation modes for carbon nanosprings beyond the already studied tension/compression regime, particularly bending and twisting. The helix-reversal defect energies and the identification of stable folded states are potentially valuable for nanoelectromechanical applications and for understanding chirality switching. The claimed high axial thermal expansion coefficient is a concrete, falsifiable prediction. However, the central mechanical-defect claims are weakened because the employed force field is a non-reactive valence force field: the ``cracks'' and ``fractures'' described in Sections III and IV cannot correspond to covalent bond rupture. The paper also asserts force-field independence without performing any comparative simulations. These issues affect the interpretation of the main defect-formation claims, although the observed shapes may still be reproducible as large plastic kinks and folds.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (2)–(4); Sections III–IV] The Hamiltonian contains only valence interactions (bonds, angles, torsions) described by the force field of Ref. [9] plus Lennard-Jones nonbonded interactions. No reactive bond-order term, bond-breaking criterion, or dissociation channel is specified. Therefore the ``transverse cracks'' in Figs. 4(c) and 6(c), the ``irrecoverable fracture'' in Section IV, and the ``nanospring fracture'' in Fig. 12 cannot be actual C–C bond rupture. They are large kinks or folds stabilized by van der Waals contacts. This distinction is load-bearing for the paper's central claim that compression and bending produce ``structural defects'' of fracture type. Please either replace the fracture terminology with a description of irreversible plastic kinks/folds, or redo the key simulations with a reactive potential (e.g., AIREBO) that permits bond breaking, and compare the resulting defect structures and critic
  2. [Section II, paragraph after Eq. (2)] The unqualified statement ``the results obtained do not depend on the type of force field used. Thus, the AIREBO force field ... will lead to the same results'' is not supported by any comparative simulation. Because AIREBO includes reactive bond breaking and can alter both critical strains and the very nature of the observed defects, this assertion cannot be taken as given. At minimum, the statement should be removed or softened; ideally, at least one representative compression and one bending case should be repeated with AIREBO to justify the claim. This is a load-bearing point because the manuscript's fracture-related conclusions depend on the force field being adequate for large-deformation and bond-breaking behavior.
  3. [Sections III, IV, V, and VII] Several quantitative results are presented as single values without statistical uncertainties, despite the simulations being performed at finite temperature (T = 300 K) with Langevin dynamics: the critical compressions h1, h2, h3 in Section III; the critical forces F0 in Section IV; the defect energies Ed and angles φd in Table I; and the twist-angle transition in Section VII. For a stochastic simulation at 300 K, one would expect run-to-run fluctuations, especially near instabilities. The paper should report means and standard deviations over multiple independent heating/loading trajectories, or at least provide an estimate of the thermal uncertainty for the key quantities (F0, Ed, alpha). Without this, the quantitative agreement claimed for specific critical values is not reproducible.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section VI] The chemical formula in ``the dynamics of a 4-kekulene nanospring (C15H17)400'' appears to be a typo; earlier the 4-kekulene unit is (C15H5). The text should be corrected.
  2. [Figure 3 and Figure 5 captions] The captions contain an apparent typo: ``1 2 3 h'' appears on the y-axis description, which seems to be leftover text. The vertical axis is actually ``energy (eV)'' and the horizontal axis is h.
  3. [Section II, Eq. (1)] The sentence ``the coordinates of the carbon atoms of the n-th cell of the helix are completely determined by the by the coordinates of the previous n − 1 cell'' contains a duplicated phrase. Also, the notation x_{n,j} in Eq. (1) is not fully defined before use; it should be stated that j indexes atoms within the cell.
  4. [Conclusion item 1] The claim that the thermal expansion coefficient is ``significantly higher than that of many metals and alloys'' would be more compelling if the comparison included quantitative reference values for at least a few metals, rather than relying on general knowledge.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all reported defect energies, critical forces/angles, and thermal expansion values are outputs of the stated Hamiltonian, not inputs repackaged as predictions.

full rationale

The paper's claimed results—helix reversal defect energies E_d, defect angles φ_d, critical twist/compression/bending thresholds, folded-state energies, and the axial thermal expansion coefficient α≈5×10^-5 K^-1—are all computed by energy minimization and Langevin dynamics from the Hamiltonian in Eq. (2). No equation defines an input in terms of an output, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The defect energy E_d=E_1−E_0 is a difference of stationary-state energies of the same potential; the thermal expansion coefficient is d ln L/dT from simulated length changes; the 'transverse crack' and 'fracture' events are features of the energy landscape of the model. The only self-referential element is the provenance of the empirical force field: 'The deformation of nanosprings is modeled using the force field described in Ref. [9]', and Ref. [9] is by two of the current authors. This is model provenance, not circularity, because the target mechanical and thermal properties are not assumed in the construction of the force field. The statement 'the results obtained do not depend on the type of force field used' is an unverified generalization, and the possibility that the non-reactive valence field cannot describe true covalent bond rupture is a physical correctness/robustness concern; but an unsupported assertion of transferability is not a reduction of a prediction to its input. No step satisfies the specific circularity definitions in the instructions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on an empirical force field and a specific helical geometry inherited from the authors' own earlier work. No new physical entities are introduced. The thermal expansion coefficient, defect energies, and critical strains are outputs of the model, not fitted parameters. However, the validity of the force field for fracture and defects is asserted, not demonstrated.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The force field of Ref [9] accurately represents carbon nanospring mechanics under large deformation, including possible bond rupture.
    All simulations use this potential; the paper states results are force-field independent but does not test this with an alternative potential. The potential's bond-breaking behavior is never described.
  • domain assumption The helical ground state generated by successive rotations Δφ≈61° and shifts Δz≈0.58 Å, relaxed via Eq. (5), is the physically relevant starting structure.
    The ground state geometry is taken from the authors' prior work (Ref [9]) and is not benchmarked against experiments or ab initio calculations.
  • standard math Langevin dynamics with a 10 ps relaxation time and velocity Verlet with 1 fs time step produce equilibrated states representative of the canonical ensemble.
    Standard numerical integration and thermostatting approach; no convergence analysis with respect to thermostat strength is provided.
  • domain assumption Finite nanosprings of N=180, 200, or 400 structural units are representative of longer springs.
    The paper argues folded states become more favorable with length but does not systematically study length effects on defect energies or thermal expansion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Structural and helix reversal defects of carbon nanosprings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FKBTCGV6

@misc{pith2026250804490,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Structural and helix reversal defects of carbon nanosprings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FKBTCGV6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.04490}
}
read the original abstract

Due to their chiral structure, carbon nanosprings possess unique properties that are promising for nanotechnology applications. The structural transformations of carbon nanosprings in the form of spiral macromolecules derived from planar coronene and kekulene molecules (graphene helicoids and spiral nanoribbons) are analyzed using molecular dynamics simulations. While the tension/compression of such nanosprings has been analyzed in the literature, this study investigates other modes of deformation, including bending and twisting. Depending on the geometric characteristics of the carbon nanosprings, the formation of structural and helix reversal defects is described. It is found that nanosprings demonstrate a significantly higher coefficient of axial thermal expansion than many metals and alloys. These results are useful for designing nanosensors that operate over a wide temperature range.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.04490 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (b,d)). The chiral structures of the first type pos￾sess an inner channel, while the structures of the second type are devoid of such a feature. In this work, we show that helical carbon nanosprings, in addition to their high tensile ability, have other unique mechanical properties. Thus, their compression can lead to the formation of stable folded structures with frac￾tures, and their twisting can lead to the forma… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The temperature dependencies of (a) the dimension [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: The dependence of the energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The dependence of the energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The equilibrium folded 3-kekulene nanosprings [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Stationary states of 4-kekulene nanospring [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The equilibrium folded 4-kekulene nanosprings [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Relaxation of the 4-kekulene nanospring (C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_11.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The helix reversal defects in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: The energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: The structure of 4-coronene nanospring (C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Electronic properties and topological aspects of graphene nanohelicoids

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A tight-binding analysis of honeycomb lattices on helicoidal surfaces finds width-controlled gap oscillations and an alternating Zak phase, though the topological invariant depends on the chosen unit-cell convention.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [9]

    11: Relaxation of the 4-kekulene nanospring (C 15H5)400 initially stretched up to h = 5 .5

    with the initial conditions Xn(0) = X0 n, ˙Xn(0) = 0, n = 1, 2, ..., N, (12) is numerically integrated, where the vector {X0 n}N n=1 0 5 10 150 30 60 90 120 1 2 t (ns) L (nm) FIG. 11: Relaxation of the 4-kekulene nanospring (C 15H5)400 initially stretched up to h = 5 .5. The dependence of the nanospring length L on time t is shown. Curve 1 is obtained in ...

    work page

  2. [1]

    The dimensionless heat capacity and the coefficient of axial thermal expansion were calculated in a wide range of temperatures, as shown in Fig

    work page

  3. [2]

    represent the kinetic energy, the valence interaction energy, and the van der Waals interaction energy, respectively. The van der Waals interactions are described by the Lennard-Jones potentials W (Xn, Xk) = NC∑ j=1 NC∑ i=1 ULJ (rn,j;k,i), (3) where the distance between the i-th atom of the k-th structural unit and the j-atom of the n-th structural unit i...

  4. [3]

    is numerically integrated with the boundary conditions X1 ≡ X0 1, x N,j ≡ x0 N,j , y N,j ≡ y0 N,j , (8) zN,j (t) = z0 N,j − vt, j = 1, ..., NC, and initial conditions Eq. ( 7). The rate of compression is v = 0 .05 ˚ A/ps and the simulation temperature is T = 300 K. After reaching the desired value of longitudinal dimen- sionless compression h(t0) = L(t0)/...

  5. [4]

    (10) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) FIG

    with the boundary condi- tions X1 ≡ X0 1, XN ≡ XN (t0), (9) and the initial conditions Xn(0) = Xn(t0), ˙Xn(0) = ˙Xn(t0), n = 1, 2, ..., N. (10) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) FIG. 4: The 4-coronene nanospring (C 16H4)180 under axial compression: (a) h = 0 .981, (b) 0.873, (c) 0.869, (d) 0.757, and (e) 0.752. 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 0 5 10 1 2 3 h ¯E − Em (eV) FIG. 5: ...

  6. [5]

    As can be seen, changing the temperature from 1 K to 300 K only results in a slight upward shift of the curve

    Temperature has no significant effect on the shape of this function. As can be seen, changing the temperature from 1 K to 300 K only results in a slight upward shift of the curve. The change in shape of the nanospring under compression is shown in Fig. 4. At weak relative compression, 1 > h ≥ h1 = 0.976, the nanospring energy grows proportionally to the par...

    work page

  7. [6]

    A time step of 1 fs 200 400 600 800 1000 1 1.02 1.04 1.06c (a) 1 2 3 4 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1 1.05 1.1¯L/L0 T (K) (b) 5 6 7 8 FIG

    are solved numerically using the velocity Verlet method [ 59]. A time step of 1 fs 200 400 600 800 1000 1 1.02 1.04 1.06c (a) 1 2 3 4 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1 1.05 1.1¯L/L0 T (K) (b) 5 6 7 8 FIG. 2: The temperature dependencies of (a) the dimension- less heat capacity c and (b) the relative elongation ¯L/L0 of the helical l-kekulene nanosprings (curves 1,...

  8. [7]

    At weak relative compression, 1 > h ≥ h1 = 0 .976, the nanospring axis remains straight, and its energy grows quadratically, see Fig

    The nanospring behaves like a hinged Euler rod. At weak relative compression, 1 > h ≥ h1 = 0 .976, the nanospring axis remains straight, and its energy grows quadratically, see Fig. 6(a). At h = h1 = 0 .976, the straight configuration becomes unstable. The axis of the nanospring bends into the shape of a half-wave sinu- soid, see Fig. 6(b). Further compres...

    work page

Show all 84 references
  1. [8]

    7 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) φd FIG

    The values of Ed and φd for different nanosprings are presented in Table I. 7 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) φd FIG. 10: The helix reversal defects in l-coronene nanospring (in graphene helicoid) with (a) l = 2, (b) l = 3, (c) l = 4, and (d) l = 5, and in l-kekulene nanospring (in...

  2. [10]

    Such defects are characteristic of helical polymer molecules

    This structural defect describes a local change in the direction of rotation of the helix. Such defects are characteristic of helical polymer molecules. Helix rever- sal defects are present in polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) crystals, where they cause helical inversion [ 62], an...

  3. [11]

    The convergence occurs due to the formation of growing non-stretched regions with longitudinal ∆ z0 and angular pitch ∆ φ0 at the ends of the helix. Without rotation of these end sections, their convergence would lead to the formation of Nφ − Nφ,0 = 11 .6 coils with opposite t...

  4. [12]

    In addition to these four de- fects, a structural defect (nanospring fracture) is formed

    Helix reversal defects form at the edges of these sections. In addition to these four de- fects, a structural defect (nanospring fracture) is formed. If the relaxation of the stretched nanospring takes place in a viscous medium, i.e. taking into account its interaction with th...

  5. [13]

    Therefore, the helix relaxes directly to its ground state and no de- 8 1 2 3 FIG

    In this case, the convergence time is sufficient to remove the negative twist arising in the center of the nanospring due to the rotation of the ends. Therefore, the helix relaxes directly to its ground state and no de- 8 1 2 3 FIG. 12: The structure of the initially stretched 4...

  6. [14]

    The value |ω| = 0.25 ps −1 is set

    is numerically integrate with the following boundary and initial conditions X1(t) ≡ X0 1, {Xn(0) = X0 n, ˙Xn(0) = 0}N −1 n=2 , xN,j (t) = cos( ωt)x0 N,j − sin(ωt)y0 N,j , (13) yN,j (t) = sin( ωt)x0 N,j + cos(ωt)y0 N,j , j = 1, ..., NC where ω defines the angular velocity of the...

  7. [15]

    The coefficient of axial thermal expansion is as large as α ≈ 5 × 10−5 K−1, which is significantly higher than that of many metals and alloys

    The heat capacity increases with temperature linearly due to the soft anharmonicity of the van der Waals interactions between coils of the nanosprings. The coefficient of axial thermal expansion is as large as α ≈ 5 × 10−5 K−1, which is significantly higher than that of many meta...

  8. [16]

    4 for 4-coronene and Fig

    Nanosprings under axial compression have been shown to behave similarly to hinged elastic rods (see Fig. 4 for 4-coronene and Fig. 6 for 4-kekulene). They maintain a straight shape below the critical value of the compressive force, see panels (a), and demonstrate lateral buckl...

  9. [17]

    At a cer- tain level of bending force, nanosprings undergo ir- reversible changes in shape

    The bending of nanosprings initiates with their arching, which is elastic deformation, and ceases once the bending forces are eliminated. At a cer- tain level of bending force, nanosprings undergo ir- reversible changes in shape. In Fig. 7 and Fig. 8 the folded equilibrium str...

  10. [18]

    Carbon nanosprings may exhibit helix reversal de- fects, separating the left-handed part from the right-handed part, as illustrated in Fig

  11. [19]

    The en- ergies of the equilibrium helix reversal defects and the angle between the axis of the adjacent halves of the nanosprings are given for l-coronene and l- kekulene nanosprings in Tab. I. 10

  12. [20]

    Twisting in the opposite direction is more in- teresting

    Twisting of nanosprings increasing its twist, leads to quadratic growth of potential energy with twist angle. Twisting in the opposite direction is more in- teresting. The potential energy increases quadrati- cally at first, but after reaching a specific twist an- gle, the energ...

  13. [21]

    Y. Qian, S. Jiang, Y. Li, Z. Yi, J. Zhou, J. Tian, N. Lin, Y. Qian, Water-induced growth of a highly ori- ented mesoporous graphitic carbon nanospring for fast potassium-ion adsorption/intercalation storage, Ange- wandte Chemie - International Edition 58 (50) (2019) 18108–1811...

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    S. Yang, X. Chen, S. Motojima, Morphology of the growth tip of carbon microcoils/nanocoils, Diamond and Related Materials 13 (11-12) (2004) 2152–2155. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2004.06.014

    2004 doi

  15. [23]

    S. H. Ghaderi, E. Hajiesmaili, Molecular struc- tural mechanics applied to coiled carbon nanotubes, Computational Materials Science 55 (2012) 344–349. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.11.016

    2012 doi

  16. [24]

    Liu, Y.-L

    J. Liu, Y.-L. Lu, M. Tian, F. Li, J. Shen, Y. Gao, L. Zhang, The interesting influence of nanosprings on the viscoelasticity of elastomeric polymer materials: Sim - ulation and experiment, Advanced Functional Materials 23 (9) (2013) 1156–1163. doi:10.1002/adfm.201201438

    2013 doi

  17. [25]

    M. A. Poggi, J. S. Boyles, L. A. Bottomley, A. W. Mc- Farland, J. S. Colton, C. V. Nguyen, R. M. Stevens, P. T. Lillehei, Measuring the compression of a car- bon nanospring, Nano Letters 4 (6) (2004) 1009–1016. doi:10.1021/nl0497023

    2004 doi

  18. [26]

    S. Tang, G. Ding, X. Xie, J. Chen, C. Wang, X. Ding, F. Huang, W. Lu, M. Jiang, Nucleation and growth of single crystal graphene on hexago- nal boron nitride, Carbon 50 (1) (2012) 329–331. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2011.07.062

    2012 doi

  19. [27]

    Nakakuki, T

    Y. Nakakuki, T. Hirose, K. Matsuda, Synthesis of a heli- cal analogue of kekulene: A flexible π-expanded helicene with large helical diameter acting as a soft molecular spring, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (45) (2018) 15461–15469. doi:10.1021/jacs.8b09825

    2018 doi

  20. [28]

    Nakakuki, T

    Y. Nakakuki, T. Hirose, H. Sotome, H. Miyasaka, K. Matsuda, Hexa-peri-hexabenzo[7]helicene: Homoge- neously π-extended helicene as a primary substructure of helically twisted chiral graphenes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (12) (2018) 4317–4326. doi:10.1021/jacs.7b13412

    2018 doi

  21. [29]

    A. V. Savin, S. V. Dmitriev, Inhomogeneous elastic stretching of carbon nanosprings, Com- putational Materials Science 244 (2024) 113254. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113254

    2024

  22. [30]

    Y. Zhao, C. Zhang, D. D. Kohler, J. M. Scheeler, J. C. Wright, P. M. Voyles, Jin.S., Supertwisted spirals of layered materials enabled by growth on non-euclidean surfaces, Science 370 (2020) 442–445. doi:10.1126/science.abc4284

    2020 doi

  23. [31]

    Z. Bie, Y. Deng, X. Liu, J. Zhu, J. Tao, X. Shi, X. He, The controllable mechanical properties of coiled carbon nan- otubes with Stone-Wales and vacancy defects, Nanoma- terials 13 (19) (2023) 2656. doi:10.3390/nano13192656

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    Z. Bie, X. Liu, J. Tao, J. Zhu, D. Yang, X. He, Investigation of carbon nanosprings with the tunable mechanical properties controlled by the defect distribution, Carbon 179 (2021) 240–255. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2021.04.035

    2021 doi

  25. [33]

    Sharifian, P

    A. Sharifian, P. Fareghi, M. Baghani, G. M. Ode- gard, A. C. van Duin, A. Rajabpour, J. Wu, M. Ba- niassadi, Unveiling novel structural complexity of spi- ral carbon nanomaterials: Review on mechanical, ther- mal, and interfacial behaviors via molecular dynam- ics, Journal of M...

    2025

  26. [34]

    T. Ikai, S. Miyoshi, K. Oki, R. Saha, Y. Hijikata, E. Yashima, Defect-free synthesis of a fully π-conjugated helical ladder polymer and resolution into a pair of enan- tiomeric helical ladders, J. Mol. Biol. 62 (20) (2023) e202301962. doi:10.1002/anie.202301962

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    Nakano, Y

    T. Nakano, Y. Okamoto, Synthetic helical polymers: Conformation and function, Chem. Rev. 101 (12) (2001) 4013–4038. doi:10.1021/cr0000978

    2001 doi

  28. [36]

    Y. Qiu, X. Wei, J. W. Y. Lam, Z. Qiu, B. Tang, Chiral nanostructures from artificial helical poly- mers: Recent advances in synthesis, regulation, and functions, ACS Nano 19 (1) (2025) 229–280. doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c14797

    2025 doi

  29. [37]

    Yashima, K

    E. Yashima, K. Maeda, H. Iida, Y. Furusho, K. Na- gai, Helical polymers: Synthesis, structures, and functions, Chem. Rev. 109 (11) (2009) 6102–6211. 11 doi:10.1021/cr900162q

    2009 doi

  30. [38]

    Atanasov, A

    V. Atanasov, A. Saxena, Helicoidal graphene nanorib- bons: Chiraltronics, Phys. Rev. B 92 (2015) 035440. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.035440

    2015 doi

  31. [39]

    Avdoshenko, P

    S. Avdoshenko, P. Koskinen, H. Sevincli, A. A. Popov, C. G. Rocha, Topological signatures in the electronic structure of graphene spirals, Sci. Rep. 3 (2013) 1632. doi:10.1038/srep01632

    2013 doi

  32. [40]

    J. Tan, X. Zhang, W. Liu, X. He, M. Zhao, Strain- induced tunable negative differential resistance in trian- gle graphene spirals, Nanotechnology 29 (2018) 205202. doi:10.1088/1361-6528/aab1d9

    2018 doi

  33. [41]

    Zhang, M

    X. Zhang, M. Zhao, Strain-induced phase transition and electron spin-polarization in graphene spirals, Sci. Rep. 4 (2014) 5699. doi:10.1038/srep05699

    2014 doi

  34. [42]

    Korhonen, P

    T. Korhonen, P. Koskinen, Electromechanics of graphene spirals, AIP Advances 4 (2014) 127125. doi:10.1063/1.4904219

    2014 doi

  35. [43]

    X. Xu, B. Liu, W. Zhao, Y. Jiang, L. Liu, W. Li, G. Zhang, W. Q. Tian, Mechanism of mechanically induced optoelectronic and spintronic phase transi- tions in 1d graphene spirals: insight into the role of interlayer coupling, Nanoscale 9 (2017) 9693–9700. doi:10.1039/C7NR03432F

    2017 doi

  36. [44]

    Porsev, R

    V. Porsev, R. Evarestov, Magnetic properties of zig-zag-edged hexagonal nanohelicenes: A quantum chemical study, Nanomaterials 13 (3) (2023) 415. doi:10.3390/nano13030415

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    F. Xu, H. Yu, A. Sadrzadeh, B. I. Yakob- son, Riemann surfaces of carbon as graphene nanosolenoids, Nano Lett. 16 (1) (2016) 34–39. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02430

    2016 doi

  38. [46]

    Y. Lin, Q. Shi, Y. Hao, Z. Song, Z. Zhou, Y. Fu, X. Chen, Z. Zhang, J. Wu, The effect of non-uniform pitch length and spiraling pathway on the mechan- ical properties of coiled carbon nanotubes, Interna- tional Journal of Mechanical Sciences 257 (2023) 108532. doi:10.1016/j.ijm...

    2023

  39. [47]

    Liu, Y.-D

    Z.-P. Liu, Y.-D. Guo, X.-H. Yan, H.-L. Zeng, X.-Y. Mou, Z.-R. Wang, J.-J. Wang, A metal-semiconductor transi- tion in helical graphene nanoribbon, J. Appl. Phys. 126 (2019) 144303. doi:10.1063/1.5118738

    2019 doi

  40. [48]

    Thakur, P

    R. Thakur, P. K. Ahluwalia, A. Kumar, R. Sharma, Stability and electronic properties of bilayer graphene spirals, Physica E 129 (2021) 114638. doi:10.1016/j.physe.2021.114638

    2021

  41. [49]

    Z. Zhou, L. Yan, X.-M. Wang, D. Zhang, J.-Y. Yan, The sensitive energy band structure and the spiral current in helical graphenes, Results Phys. 35 (2022) 105351. doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105351

    2022

  42. [50]

    V. V. Porsev, A. V. Bandura, S. I. Lukyanov, R. A. Evarestov, Expanded hexagonal nanohelicenes of zigzag morphology under elastic strain: A quan- tum chemical study, Carbon 152 (2019) 755–765. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2019.06.036

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    H. Li, H. Hassanzadeh afrouzi, M. M. A. Zahra, B. S. Bashar, F. Fathdal, S. K. Hadrawi, A. Alizadeh, M. Hekmatifar, K. Al-Majdi, I. Alhani, A comprehen- sive investigation of thermal conductivity in of mono- layer graphene, helical graphene with different percent- ages of hydro...

    2023

  44. [52]

    Norouzi, M

    S. Norouzi, M. M. S. Fakhrabadi, Anisotropic nature of thermal conductivity in graphene spirals revealed by molecular dynamics simulations, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 137 (2020) 109228. doi:10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.109228

    2020

  45. [53]

    Sharifian, T

    A. Sharifian, T. Karbaschi, A. Rajabpour, M. Baghani, J. Wu, M. Baniassadi, Insights into thermal charac- teristics of spiral carbon-based nanomaterials: From heat transport mechanisms to tunable thermal diode behavior, Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 189 (2022) 122719. doi:10.1016/j.i...

    2022

  46. [54]

    H. Zhan, G. Zhang, C. Yang, Y. T. Gu, Graphene helicoid: The distinct properties promote applica- tion of graphene related materials in thermal man- agement, Phys. Chem. C 122 (14) (2018) 7605–7612. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b00868

    2018 doi

  47. [55]

    Sestak, J

    P. Sestak, J. Wu, J. He, P. J., Z. Zhang, Extraor- dinary deformation capacity of smallest carbohelicene springs, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17 (2015) 18684. doi:10.1039/c5cp02043c

    2015 doi

  48. [56]

    H. Zhan, Y. Zhang, C. Yang, G. Zhang, Y. Gu, Graphene helicoid as novel nanospring, Carbon 120 (2017) 18684. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2017.05.044

    2017 doi

  49. [57]

    H. Zhan, G. Zhang, C. Yang, Y. Gu, Break- down of Hooke’s law at nanoscale - 2D materials- based nanospring, Nanoscale 10 (2018) 18961–18968. doi:10.1039/C8NR04882G

    2018 doi

  50. [58]

    Norouzi, M

    S. Norouzi, M. M. S. Fakhrabadi, Nanomechanical prop- erties of single- and double-layer graphene spirals: a molecular dynamics simulation, Appl. Phys. A 125 (2019) 321. doi:10.1007/s00339-019-2623-8

    2019 doi

  51. [59]

    Sharifian, A

    A. Sharifian, A. Moshfegh, A. Javadzadegan, H. H. Afrouzi, M. Baghani, M. Baniassadi, Hydrogenation- controlled mechanical properties in graphene heli- coids: exceptional distribution-dependent behavior, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 (2019) 12423–12433. doi:10.1039/C9CP01361J

    2019 doi

  52. [60]

    C. Zhu, J. Ji, Z. Zhang, S. Dong, N. Wei, J. Zhao, Huge stretchability and reversibility of helical graphene s using molecular dynamics simulations and simplified theoretical models, Mech. Mater. 153 (2021) 103683. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103683

    2021

  53. [61]

    A. Y. Afanasyev, A. V. Onufriev, Stretching of long double-stranded DNA and RNA described by the same approach, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18 (6) (2022) 3911– 3920. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01221

    2022 doi

  54. [62]

    A. V. Savin, I. P. Kikot, M. A. Mazo, A. V. Onufriev, Two-phase stretching of molecular chains, PNAS 110 (8) (2013) 2816–2821. doi:10.1073/pnas.1218677110

    2013 doi

  55. [63]

    S. B. Smith, Y. Cui, C. Bustamante, Overstretching B- DNA: the elastic response of individual double-stranded and single-stranded DNA molecules, Science 271 (1996) 795–799. doi:10.1126/science.271.5250.795

    1996 doi

  56. [64]

    R. I. Babicheva, K. A. Bukreeva, S. V. Dmitriev, R. R. Mulyukov, K. Zhou, Strengthening of NiAl nanofilms by introducing internal stresses, Intermetallics 43 (2013 ) 171–176. doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2013.07.024

    2013 doi

  57. [65]

    R. I. Babicheva, K. A. Bukreeva, S. V. Dmitriev, K. Zhou, Discontinuous elastic strain ob- served during stretching of NiAl single crystal nanofilms, Comp. Mater. Sci. 79 (2013) 52–55. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.06.007

    2013 doi

  58. [66]

    K. A. Bukreeva, R. I. Babicheva, S. V. Dmitriev, K. Zhou, R. R. Mulyukov, Negative stiffness of the FeAl intermetallic nanofilm, Phys. Solid State 55 (9) (2013) 1963–1967. doi:10.1134/S1063783413090072. 12

    2013 doi

  59. [67]

    S. V. Dmitriev, J. A. Baimova, A. V. Savin, Y. S. Kivshar, Ultimate strength, ripples, sound velocities, an d density of phonon states of strained graphene, Com- putational Materials Science 53 (1) (2012) 194–203. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.08.019

    2012 doi

  60. [68]

    R. Liu, J. Zhao, L. Wang, N. Wei, Nonlinear vibra- tions of helical graphene resonators in the dynamic nano- indentation testing, Nanotechnology 31 (2020) 025709. doi:10.1088/1361-6528/ab4760

    2020 doi

  61. [69]

    Mokhalingam, S

    A. Mokhalingam, S. S. Gupta, Helical single-walled carbon nanotubes under mechanical and electro- static loading, Carbon Trends 9 (2022) 100204. doi:10.1016/j.cartre.2022.100204

    2022

  62. [70]

    W. D. Cornell, W. P. Cieplak, C. I. Bayly, I. R. Gould, K. M. Merz, D. M. Ferguson, D. C. Spellmeyer, T. Fox, J. W. Caldwell, P. A. Kollman, A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 (19) (1995) 5...

    1995 doi

  63. [71]

    M. A. Ilgamov, A. A. Aitbaeva, I. S. Pavlov, S. V. Dmitriev, Carbon nanotube under pulsed pressure, Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering 22 (2) (2024) 275–292. doi:10.22190/FUME230820049I

    2024 doi

  64. [72]

    D. S. Lisovenko, J. A. Baimova, L. K. Rysaeva, V. A. Gorodtsov, A. I. Rudskoy, S. V. Dmitriev, Equi- librium diamond-like carbon nanostructures with cu- bic anisotropy: Elastic properties, Physica Status So- lidi (B) Basic Research 253 (7) (2016) 1295–1302. doi:10.1002/pssb.201600049

    2016 doi

  65. [73]

    I. S. Pavlov, L. K. Galiakhmetova, A. A. Kudreyko, S. V. Dmitriev, Mobility of dislocations in carbon nanotube bundles, Materials Today Communications 40 (2024) 110094. doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110094

    2024

  66. [74]

    A. V. Savin, Y. S. Kivshar, B. Hu, Suppres- sion of thermal conductivity in graphene nanoribbons with rough edges, Phys. Rev. B 82 (2010) 195422. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.82.195422

    2010 doi

  67. [75]

    S. J. Stuart, A. B. Tutein, J. A. Harrison, A reac- tive potential for hydrocarbons with intermolecular in- teractions, J. Chem. Phys. 112 (14) (2000) 6472–6486. doi:10.1063/1.481208

    2000 doi

  68. [76]

    Setton, Carbon nanotubes-II

    R. Setton, Carbon nanotubes-II. cohesion and formatio n energy of cylindrical nanotubes, Carbon 34 (1) (1996) 69–75. doi:10.1016/0008-6223(95)00136-0

    1996 doi

  69. [77]

    Fletcher, C

    R. Fletcher, C. Reeves, Function minimization by conju - gate gradients, Computer Journal 7 (2) (1964) 149–154. doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.2.149

    1964 doi

  70. [78]

    D. F. Shanno, K. H. Phua, Algorithm 500: Minimiza- tion of unconstrained multivariate functions [e4], ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) 2 (1) (1976) 87–94. doi:10.1145/355666.355673

    1976

  71. [79]

    Verlet, Computer ”experiments” on classical fluids

    L. Verlet, Computer ”experiments” on classical fluids. i. thermodynamical properties of lennard- jones molecules, Phys. Rev. 159 (1) (1967) 98–103. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.159.98

    1967 doi

  72. [80]

    J. Liu, Y. Deng, Q. Zheng, C. S. Cheng, N. R. Kallen- bach, M. Lu, A parallel coiled-coil tetramer with off- set helices, Biochemistry 45 (51) (2006) 15224–15231. doi:10.1021/bi061914m

    2006 doi

  73. [81]

    C. E. Schafmeister, S. L. LaPorte, L. J. Miercke, R. M. Stroud, A designed four helix bundle protein with native- like structure, Nat Struct Mol Biol 4 (1997) 1039–1046. doi:10.1038/nsb1297-1039

    1997 doi

  74. [82]

    D. B. Holt, B. L. Farmer, Modeling of helix rever- sal defects in polytetrafluoroethylene ii. molecular dy- namics simulations, Polymer 40 (16) (1999) 4673–4684. doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00076-2

    1999 doi

  75. [83]

    Y. Jeon, B. Goh, J. Choi, Nanomechanical investigation of deformation behavior of π-π stacked helical polymers, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 290 (2025) 110100. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110100

    2025

  76. [84]

    Rey-Tarrio, R

    F. Rey-Tarrio, R. Rodriguez, E. Quinoa, F. Freire, Screw sense excess and reversals of helical poly- mers in solution, Nat Commun 14 (2023) 1742. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37405-z

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.