Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Theory of electron-phonon interactions in extended correlated systems probed by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Phonon peak ratios in RIXS reveal electron motion, not just coupling strength.

desk verdict A useful, clearly-written DMRG-RIXS study of the Hubbard-Holstein model whose central claim is plausible but whose lack of RIXS convergence tests keeps it from being 'numerically exact'. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12995 v1 pith:FL6RFAAT submitted 2024-12-17 cond-mat.str-el

Jinu Thomas , Debshikha Banerjee , Alberto Nocera , Steven Johnston This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords resonantinelasticx-rayscatteringelectron-phononcouplingHubbard-HolsteinmodeldensitymatrixrenormalizationgroupMottinsulatorcore-holepotentialphononexcitationsone-dimensionalcorrelatedsystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) spectra of a strongly correlated electron-phonon system can be read with the simple single-site Lang-Firsov model commonly used to extract coupling strengths from experiments. Using DMRG simulations of the one-dimensional half-filled Hubbard-Holstein model, the authors compute the full RIXS response while treating electron hopping, Hubbard repulsion, core-hole potential, and core-hole-lattice coupling on equal footing. They find that phonon excitations acquire momentum-dependent intensities even when the bare electron-phonon coupling is momentum-independent, because the intermediate-state doublon can hop before the core hole decays. The size of this effect is controlled by the core-hole potential: deep potentials localize the doublon and restore the single-site prediction, while shallow potentials do not. If correct, the work implies that previously published electron-phonon coupling strengths extracted from RIXS data with single-site models could be systematically underestimated.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the intermediate-state doublon and its delocalization pathways. In the Kramers-Heisenberg scattering amplitude, the photon creates a core hole and an excited electron; the resulting doublon can either stay at the core-hole site and shake the local oscillator (the single-site Lang-Firsov channel) or hop away and back, creating phonons on neighboring sites. The relative weight of these pathways is set by the core-hole potential $V_c$ and the core-hole lifetime $\Gamma$. The paper computes the spectra with the DMRG correction-vector method on 24-site chains, which treats all these processes without operator or diagrammatic expansions; the single-site Lang-Firsov amplitude is derived in Appendix A as the reference limit.

What would settle it

Recompute the RIXS spectra for the same parameters with larger bond dimension and phonon truncation, or with a time-dependent DMRG approach, and check whether the momentum dependence of $I_2(q)/I_1(q)$ at $V_c = -4t$ survives; if it disappears, the central claim collapses. Alternatively, measure the first-phonon-overtone intensity ratio across the Brillouin zone at both the Cu L-edge and the O K-edge of a 1D cuprate such as Sr$_2$CuO$_3$: the O K-edge, with a deeper core-hole potential, should show a flatter ratio if the core-hole-potential mechanism is right.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is that in the half-filled Hubbard-Holstein model, the RIXS phonon overtone intensities become momentum-dependent even when the bare electron-phonon coupling $g$ is constant. In the single-site Lang-Firsov limit, the ratio $I_2(q)/I_1(q)$ of two-phonon to one-phonon intensity is constant in momentum; the DMRG spectra instead show $I_2(\pi/a)/I_1(\pi/a)$ larger than the value at $q=0$ for a shallow core-hole potential $V_c = -4t$. This momentum dependence arises from electron mobility: the doublon created in the intermediate state can delocalize, excite phonons on neighboring sites, and return, processes that interfere with the purely local Franck-Condon pathway. Deepening the core-hole potential to $V_c = -12t$ suppresses these delocalization pathways and the spectra approach the single-site prediction, identifying the core-hole potential as the switch that controls how much itinerancy appears in the spectra. A second result is that the phonon feature observed in RIXS tracks the renormalized phonon dispersion obtained from the dynamical structure factor, including softening and Kohn-anomaly features when charge fluctuations hybridize with phonons at smaller $U$.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument relies on the DMRG spectra being numerically converged with respect to bond dimension, phonon truncation, and the center-site approximation, but the paper only shows convergence tests for the absorption spectra, not for the RIXS response or the intensity ratios that carry the central claim.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Electron-phonon coupling strengths extracted from RIXS data with the single-site Lang-Firsov model are likely underestimated when the core-hole potential is shallow, for example at transition-metal L-edges.
  • Doping a Mott insulator will reduce phonon excitation intensity independent of screening, so coupling strengths extracted from doped cuprates may need revision.
  • RIXS phonon dispersion reflects the renormalized phonon dispersion including hybridization with charge excitations, supporting interpretations of dispersive CDW phonon anomalies in cuprates.
  • A core-hole-lattice coupling acts mostly as a local effective coupling $g_{\mathrm{eff}} = g + g_{\mathrm{CH}}$, but with nontrivial momentum-dependent residuals at shallow core-hole potentials, such as zone-boundary phonons when the local effective coupling vanishes.
  • Comparing edges with different core-hole potentials (for example ligand K-edges versus transition-metal L-edges) could disentangle the intrinsic electron-phonon coupling from core-hole-lattice coupling and delocalization effects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct experimental test is to measure the momentum-dependent phonon overtone intensity ratio at the Cu L-edge and the O K-edge of the same quasi-1D cuprate: the deeper core-hole potential at the K-edge should suppress the momentum dependence if the mechanism is right.
  • The center-site approximation used in the DMRG correction-vector method is the main uncontrolled approximation for the RIXS response; since the paper validates convergence only for the absorption spectra, a time-dependent DMRG or larger-bond-dimension check of the intensity ratios would settle whether the central claim is an artifact.
  • If the effect survives in two dimensions, the momentum dependence of phonon overtones could serve as a probe of polaron delocalization and core-hole screening in layered cuprates, not just chain compounds.
  • The results suggest a practical guideline for future analyses: single-site fits are safer for deep core-hole edges and strongly correlated regimes, while extended-lattice modeling is required for shallow edges in itinerant or doped systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript develops a DMRG-based theoretical framework for computing XAS and RIXS spectra of the one-dimensional half-filled Hubbard-Holstein model, explicitly including the core-hole potential and core-hole-lattice coupling. The central claim is that, even for momentum-independent bare electron-phonon coupling, the RIXS phonon intensities acquire momentum dependence due to electron itinerancy, and that this effect persists deep into the Mott-insulating regime. The authors compare their numerical spectra with the single-site Lang-Firsov (SS-LF) model, emphasizing that the common SS-LF analysis of experiments can underestimate or mischaracterize the electron-phonon coupling. They also discuss how the core-hole potential, core-hole lifetime, Hubbard U, and core-hole-lattice coupling modify the spectra.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper makes a valuable contribution: it provides a numerically exact (in the DMRG sense) treatment of RIXS in an extended correlated electron-phonon system and directly challenges the widely used SS-LF interpretation of phonon RIXS intensities. The parameter-free nature of the calculations, in the sense that no experimental data are fitted, is a strength, as is the explicit treatment of both spin and phonon excitations and the comparison against a well-defined limiting model. The paper also gives concrete falsifiable predictions, such as the momentum dependence of I2/I1 and its dependence on the core-hole potential, which could be tested experimentally at different absorption edges. However, the credibility of the central claim rests on numerical convergence evidence that is currently incomplete.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II C and Appendix D] The convergence tests reported in Appendix D and referenced in Sec. II C validate only the XAS spectra, not the RIXS response or the intensity ratios I2(q)/I1(q) that carry the paper's central claim. The central evidence in Sec. III B and Fig. 4 is obtained from RIXS spectra computed with m=500, M=10-17, on L=24 open chains, but no comparison is shown for the RIXS spectra at larger m, larger M, or larger L. Since RIXS requires propagating the intermediate state to sites j across the chain, truncation errors can be larger and less localized than in XAS. The authors should provide convergence checks for the RIXS spectra and, in particular, for the q=0 and q=pi/a values of I2/I1, as a function of m, M, and L.
  2. [Sec. II C and Eq. (B2)] The center-site approximation in Eqs. (B2) and (B6) is used for the RIXS calculations but is never validated for the RIXS response itself. Equation (B2) involves a sum over all sites j with phase factors exp[iq*(Rj - Rc)], so the Fourier components at q=0 and q=pi/a are precisely the ones most sensitive to long-range contributions and to boundary effects of the open chain. The statement in Sec. II C that the approach is 'numerically exact' is also too strong given that this approximation is unvalidated for the computed observable. The authors should test the center-site approximation against a full summation on smaller systems, or at least compare results obtained with different center-site choices and different chain lengths.
  3. [Sec. III B and Fig. 4] The conclusion that I2(q)/I1(q) is larger at q=pi/a than at q=0 for Vc=-4t, and q-independent for Vc=-12t, is drawn from normalized spectra shown in Fig. 4 without reporting the numerical values of these ratios or any estimate of their uncertainty. The authors state that the phonon peaks are isolated at these momenta because the spin-conserving magnetic weight vanishes at q=0 and pi/a, but the spectra shown still contain overlapping features at finite energy width. To make the central claim quantitative and verifiable, the authors should extract I1 and I2 by fitting the peaks (e.g., with Lorentzians or a defined integration window) and report the resulting ratios with error estimates, for each parameter set and for at least a few convergence parameters.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III D] There are several typographical errors in Sec. III D, including 'We nowxturn toases', 'wawhich favorslectron delocalization', and 'allow cs mpeting CDW correlations'; these should be corrected.
  2. [Eq. (4) and throughout] The notation for the core-hole potential is inconsistent: Eq. (4) uses VCH while the text and figures use Vc. Please unify the notation.
  3. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption statement 'The SS-LF predicts no momentum dependence for all cases, while our calculations only observe this in (c)' is ambiguous; it should be rephrased to clarify that only the Vc=-12t case shows q-independent intensity in the calculations.
  4. [Appendix D] The convergence tests are shown only for U=8t and lambda=0.5; the paper would benefit from at least brief convergence statements for the smaller-U and nonzero-lambda_CH parameter regimes where the conclusions about itinerancy and core-hole-lattice effects are drawn.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the q-dependent phonon ratios are emergent numerical outputs of an unfitted Hubbard-Holstein RIXS calculation, with self-citations supplying only methods and prior context.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained: the input Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) and intermediate-state core-hole term (Eq. 4) define the model, and the RIXS intensity (Eqs. 2-3) is computed by a DMRG correction-vector method rather than by fitting any parameter to the target spectra. The central claim, that I2(q)/I1(q) acquires q-dependence for momentum-independent bare coupling when the core-hole potential is weak, is an emergent numerical output: the bare coupling g in Eq. (1) is explicitly momentum-independent, the phonon dispersion is computed separately (Fig. 6), and no parameter is tuned to reproduce the ratio. The comparison against the SS-LF benchmark is an external check, not an input. Self-citations, such as Ref. [28] for the DMRG method and Refs. [25,26] for prior dilute-limit results, supply computational tools and motivational context; the paper explicitly extends the dilute-limit conclusion rather than importing it as proof. No equation reduces to its own input, no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is borrowed from same-author work to force the result. The strongest limitation, that Appendix D reports convergence tests for XAS but not for RIXS or the intensity ratios, is a computational robustness concern and a correctness risk, not a circularity: truncation error could bias the spectra, but it does not make the derivation equivalent to its assumptions. The paper is therefore not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard Kramers-Heisenberg formalism and DMRG as an exact diagonalization tool, plus modeling assumptions that the Hubbard-Holstein model represents the relevant materials. No new particles or forces are introduced. The free parameters are simulation inputs chosen to explore regimes, not fitted to reproduce experimental data.

free parameters (5)
  • Vc (core-hole potential) = -4t and -12t
    Chosen by hand to toggle between delocalized and localized intermediate states; not fitted to data.
  • Gamma/2 (inverse core-hole lifetime) = t/4 and t/2
    Chosen to explore lifetime effects on phonon excitation pathways; not fitted.
  • lambda (bare e-ph coupling) = 0, 1/8, 1/4, 1/2
    Chosen to span weak to moderate coupling in the Mott regime; not fitted.
  • lambda_CH (core-hole-lattice coupling) = 0, +/-1/8, +/-1/2
    Chosen to test augmentation/cancellation scenarios with valence coupling; not fitted.
  • eta (RIXS broadening) = 0.2t
    Artificial broadening chosen to approximate current experimental resolution; not fitted.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Kramers-Heisenberg scattering amplitude (Eq. 2-3) is valid
    Standard quantum mechanics of resonant scattering; used without derivation.
  • domain assumption DMRG with correction vectors converges to exact dynamical response
    Ref. 28 demonstrates the method; paper only checks XAS convergence for select parameters.
  • domain assumption Single-band Hubbard-Holstein model captures relevant low-energy physics of Cu L-edge RIXS
    Authors assert suitability for 1D cuprates and ladders.
  • domain assumption Center-site approximation does not bias q-dependence
    Used to reduce computational cost; no systematic validation for phonon intensity ratios.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Theory of electron-phonon interactions in extended correlated systems probed by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FL6RFAAT

@misc{pith2026241212995,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Theory of electron-phonon interactions in extended correlated systems probed by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FL6RFAAT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12995}
}
abstract

An emerging application of resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) is the study of lattice excitations and electron-phonon ($e$-ph) interactions in quantum materials. Despite the growing importance of this area of research, the community lacks a complete understanding of how the RIXS process excites the lattice and how these excitations encode information about the $e$-ph interactions. Here, we present a detailed study of the RIXS spectra of the Hubbard-Holstein model defined on extended one-dimensional lattices. Using the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) method, we compute the RIXS response while treating the electron mobility, many-body interactions, and core-hole interactions on an equal footing. The predicted spectra exhibit notable differences from those obtained using the commonly adopted Lang-Firsov models, with important implications for analyzing past and future experiments. Our results provide a deeper understanding of how RIXS probes $e$-ph interactions and set the stage for a more realistic analysis of future experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12995 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Examples of different excitation pathways in RIXS measurements on a one-dimensional Mott insulator coupled to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) XAS as a function of the dimensionless [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The top and bottom rows show RIXS spectra in the non-spin conserving ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. RIXS spectra measured at the center ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. RIXS spectra for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a)-(c) RIXS spectra in the SC channel as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. XAS spectra for the Hubbard-Holstein model with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. RIXS spectra in the spin conserving channel as a function of the core-hole-lattice coupling and core-hole potential. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Convergence tests of the XAS spectra obtained on an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Additional XAS results obtained for a strong [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Identifying and quantifying Su-Schrieffer-Heeger-like interactions with RIXS

    cond-mat.str-el 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    RIXS spectra of the Hubbard-SSH model show SSH phonons appearing as multi-particle excitations redshifted below the phonon dispersion, providing a fingerprint for identifying SSH-like interactions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Mitrano, S

    M. Mitrano, S. Johnston, Y.-J. Kim, and M. P. M. Dean, Exploring quantum materials with resonant inelastic x- ray scattering, Phys. Rev. X14, 040501 (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    L. J. P. Ament, M. van Veenendaal, and J. van den Brink, Determining the electron-phonon coupling strength from resonant inelastic x-ray scattering at transition metal L- edges, EPL (Europhysics Letters)95, 27008 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Gilmore, Quantifying vibronic coupling with resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys

    K. Gilmore, Quantifying vibronic coupling with resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.25, 217 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    J. N. Hancock, G. Chabot-Couture, and M. Greven, Lat- tice coupling and Franck–Condon effects in K-edge res- 13 onant inelastic x-ray scattering, New Journal of Physics 12, 033001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Yavaş, M

    H. Yavaş, M. van Veenendaal, J. van den Brink, L. J. P. Ament, A. Alatas, B. M. Leu, M.-O. Apostu, N. Wizent, G. Behr, W. Sturhahn, H. Sinn, and E. E. Alp, Observa- tion of phonons with resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, JournalofPhysics: CondensedMatter 22,485601(2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    W. S. Lee, S. Johnston, B. Moritz, J. Lee, M. Yi, K. J. Zhou, T. Schmitt, L. Patthey, V. Strocov, K. Kudo, Y. Koike, J. van den Brink, T. P. Devereaux, and Z. X. Shen, Role of lattice coupling in establishing elec- tronic and magnetic properties in quasi-one-dimensional cuprates, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 265502 (2013)

    2013

  7. [7]

    J. J. Lee, B. Moritz, W. S. Lee, M. Yi, C. J. Jia, A. P. Sorini, K. Kudo, Y. Koike, K. J. Zhou, C. Monney, V. Strocov, L. Patthey, T. Schmitt, T. P. Devereaux, and Z. X. Shen, Charge-orbital-lattice coupling effects in the dd excitation profile of one-dimensional cuprates, Phys. Rev. B89, 041104 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Moser, S

    S. Moser, S. Fatale, P. Krüger, H. Berger, P. Bugnon, A. Magrez, H. Niwa, J. Miyawaki, Y. Harada, and M. Grioni, Electron-phonon coupling in the bulk of Anatase TiO2 measured by resonant inelastic x-ray spec- troscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 096404 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    Fatale, S

    S. Fatale, S. Moser, J. Miyawaki, Y. Harada, and M. Gri- oni, Hybridization and electron-phonon coupling in ferro- electric BaTiO3 probed by resonant inelastic x-ray scat- tering, Phys. Rev. B94, 195131 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    Johnston, C

    S. Johnston, C. Monney, V. Bisogni, K.-J. Zhou, R. Kraus, G. Behr, V. N. Strocov, J. Málek, S.- L. Drechsler, J. Geck, T. Schmitt, and J. van den Brink, Electron-lattice interactions strongly renormal- ize the charge-transfer energy in the spin-chain cuprate Li2CuO2, Nature Co...

    2016

  3. [11]

    Chaix, G

    L. Chaix, G. Ghiringhelli, Y. Y. Peng, M. Hashimoto, B. Moritz, K. Kummer, N. B. Brookes, Y. He, S. Chen, S. Ishida, Y. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, M. Sal- luzzo, L. Braicovich, Z. X. Shen, T. P. Devereaux, and W. S. Lee, Dispersive charge density wave excitations in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ, ...

    2017

  4. [12]

    Meyers, K

    D. Meyers, K. Nakatsukasa, S. Mu, L. Hao, J. Yang, Y. Cao, G. Fabbris, H. Miao, J. Pelliciari, D. McNally, M. Dantz, E. Paris, E. Karapetrova, Y. Choi, D. Haskel, P. Shafer, E. Arenholz, T. Schmitt, T. Berlijn, S. John- ston, J. Liu, and M. P. M. Dean, Decoupling carrier conce...

    2018

  5. [13]

    Rossi, R

    M. Rossi, R. Arpaia, R. Fumagalli, M. Moretti Sala, D. Betto, K. Kummer, G. M. De Luca, J. van den Brink, M. Salluzzo, N. B. Brookes, L. Braicovich, and G. Ghir- inghelli, Experimental determination of momentum- resolved electron-phonon coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 027001 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Braicovich, M

    L. Braicovich, M. Rossi, R. Fumagalli, Y. Peng, Y. Wang, R. Arpaia, D. Betto, G. M. De Luca, D. Di Castro, K. Kummer, M. Moretti Sala, M. Pagetti, G. Balestrino, N. B. Brookes, M. Salluzzo, S. Johnston, J. van den Brink, and G. Ghiringhelli, Determining the electron- phonon co...

    2020

  7. [15]

    J. Li, A. Nag, J. Pelliciari, H. Robarts, A. Walters, M. Garcia-Fernandez, H. Eisaki, D. Song, H. Ding, S. Johnston, R. Comin, and K.-J. Zhou, Multiorbital charge-density wave excitations and concomitant phonon anomalies in Bi2Sr2LaCuO6+δ, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy...

    2020

  8. [16]

    J. Q. Lin, H. Miao, D. G. Mazzone, G. D. Gu, A. Nag, A. C. Walters, M. García-Fernández, A. Barbour, J. Pel- liciari, I. Jarrige, M. Oda, K. Kurosawa, N. Momono, K.- J. Zhou, V. Bisogni, X. Liu, and M. P. M. Dean, Strongly correlated charge density wave in La2−xSrxCuO4 ev- ide...

    2020

  9. [17]

    Geondzhian, A

    A. Geondzhian, A. Sambri, G. M. De Luca, R. Di Ca- pua, E. Di Gennaro, D. Betto, M. Rossi, Y. Y. Peng, R. Fumagalli, N. B. Brookes, L. Braicovich, K. Gilmore, G. Ghiringhelli, and M. Salluzzo, Large polarons as key quasiparticles in SrTiO3 and SrTiO3-based heterostruc- tures, ...

    2020

  10. [18]

    Y. Y. Peng, A. A. Husain, M. Mitrano, S. X.-L. Sun, T. A. Johnson, A. V. Zakrzewski, G. J. MacDougall, A. Barbour, I. Jarrige, V. Bisogni, and P. Abbamonte, Enhanced electron-phonon coupling for charge-density- wave formation in La1.8−xEu0.2SrxCuO4+δ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 097...

    2020

  11. [19]

    H. Y. Huang, A. Singh, C. Y. Mou, S. Johnston, A. F. Kemper, J. van den Brink, P. J. Chen, T. K. Lee, J. Okamoto, Y. Y. Chu, J. H. Li, S. Komiya, A. C. Ko- marek, A. Fujimori, C. T. Chen, and D. J. Huang, Quan- tum fluctuations of charge order induce phonon softening in a supe...

    2021

  12. [20]

    C. D. Dashwood, A. Geondzhian, J. G. Vale, A. C. Pakpour-Tabrizi, C. A. Howard, Q. Faure, L. S. I. Veiga, D. Meyers, S. G. Chiuzbăian, A. Nicolaou, N. Jaouen, R. B. Jackman, A. Nag, M. García-Fernández, K.-J. Zhou, A. C. Walters, K. Gilmore, D. F. McMorrow, and M. P. M. Dean, ...

    2021

  13. [21]

    Y. Peng, L. Martinelli, Q. Li, M. Rossi, M. Mitrano, R. Arpaia, M. M. Sala, Q. Gao, X. Guo, G. M. De Luca, A. Walters, A. Nag, A. Barbour, G. Gu, J. Pelliciari, N. B. Brookes, P. Abbamonte, M. Salluzzo, X. Zhou, K.-J. Zhou, V. Bisogni, L. Braicovich, S. Johnston, and G. Ghirin...

    2022

  14. [22]

    Naamneh, E

    M. Naamneh, E. Paris, D. McNally, Y. Tseng, W. R. Pudelko, D. J. Gawryluk, J. Shamblin, E. OQuinn, B. Cohen-Stead, M. Shi, M. Radovic, M. Lang, T. Schmitt, S. Johnston, and N. C. Plumb, Persistence of small polarons into the superconducting phase of Ba1−xKxBiO3, arXiv:2408.004...

    2024

  15. [23]

    T. P. Devereaux, A. M. Shvaika, K. Wu, K. Wohlfeld, C. J. Jia, Y. Wang, B. Moritz, L. Chaix, W.-S. Lee, Z.-X. Shen, G. Ghiringhelli, and L. Braicovich, Directly charac- terizing the relative strength and momentum dependence ofelectron-phononcouplingusingresonantinelasticx-ray ...

    2016

  16. [24]

    Geondzhian and K

    A. Geondzhian and K. Gilmore, Generalization of the Franck-Condon model for phonon excitations by reso- nant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B101, 214307 (2020). 14

    2020

  17. [25]

    Bieniasz, S

    K. Bieniasz, S. Johnston, and M. Berciu, Beyond the single-site approximation modeling of electron-phonon coupling effects on resonant inelastic X-ray scattering spectra, SciPost Phys.11, 62 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Bieniasz, S

    K. Bieniasz, S. Johnston, and M. Berciu, Theory of dis- persive optical phonons in resonant inelastic x-ray scat- tering experiments, Phys. Rev. B105, L180302 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Geondzhian and K

    A. Geondzhian and K. Gilmore, Demonstration of res- onant inelastic x-ray scattering as a probe of exciton- phonon coupling, Phys. Rev. B98, 214305 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Nocera, U

    A. Nocera, U. Kumar, N. Kaushal, G. Alvarez, E. Dagotto, and S. Johnston, Computing resonant in- elastic x-ray scattering spectra using the density ma- trix renormalization group method, Scientific Reports8, 11080 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Karakuzu, L

    S. Karakuzu, L. F. Tocchio, S. Sorella, and F. Becca, Superconductivity, charge-density waves, antiferromag- netism, and phase separation in the Hubbard-Holstein model, Phys. Rev. B96, 205145 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    N. C. Costa, K. Seki, S. Yunoki, and S. Sorella, Phase di- agram of the two-dimensional Hubbard-Holstein model, Communications Physics3, 80 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    R. P. Hardikar and R. T. Clay, Phase diagram of the one- dimensional Hubbard-Holstein model at half and quarter filling, Phys. Rev. B75, 245103 (2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    Tezuka, R

    M. Tezuka, R. Arita, and H. Aoki, Phase diagram for the one-dimensional Hubbard-Holstein model: a density- matrix renormalization group study, Phys. Rev. B76, 155114 (2007)

    2007

  25. [33]

    Hohenadler and H

    M. Hohenadler and H. Fehske, Density waves in strongly correlated quantum chains, The European Physical Jour- nal B91, 204 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    Braicovich, L

    L. Braicovich, L. J. P. Ament, V. Bisogni, F. Forte, C. Aruta, G. Balestrino, N. B. Brookes, G. M. De Luca, P. G. Medaglia, F. M. Granozio, M. Radovic, M. Sal- luzzo, J. van den Brink, and G. Ghiringhelli, Disper- sion of magnetic excitations in the cuprateLa2CuO4 and CaCuO2 c...

    2009

  27. [35]

    Bisogni, S

    V. Bisogni, S. Kourtis, C. Monney, K. Zhou, R. Kraus, C. Sekar, V. Strocov, B. Büchner, J. van den Brink, L. Braicovich, T. Schmitt, M. Daghofer, and J. Geck, Femtosecond dynamics of momentum-dependent mag- netic excitations from resonant inelastic x-ray scattering in CaCu2O3,...

    2014

  28. [36]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Physical Review Letters 69, 2863–2866 (1992)

    1992

  29. [37]

    S. R. White, Density-matrix algorithms for quan- tum renormalization groups, Physical Review B 48, 10345–10356 (1993)

    1993

  30. [38]

    Nocera and G

    A. Nocera and G. Alvarez, Spectral functions with the density matrix renormalization group: Krylov-space ap- proach for correction vectors, Physical Review E 94, 053308 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    Lu and M

    Y. Lu and M. W. Haverkort, Nonperturbative series ex- pansion of Green’s functions: the anatomy of resonant inelastic x-ray scattering in the doped Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 256401 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    van den Brink and M

    J. van den Brink and M. van Veenendaal, Correlation functions measured by indirect resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Europhys. Lett.73, 121 (2005)

    2005

  33. [41]

    A. M. Tsvelik, R. M. Konik, N. V. Prokof’ev, and I. S. Tupitsyn, Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering in metals: a diagrammatic approach, Phys. Rev. Research1, 033093 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    T. D. Kühner and S. R. White, Dynamical correla- tion functions using the density matrix renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B60, 335 (1999)

    1999

  35. [43]

    S. R. White and A. E. Feiguin, Real-time evolution us- ing the density matrix renormalization group, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 076401 (2004)

    2004

  36. [44]

    Alvarez, The density matrix renormalization group for strongly correlated electron systems: a generic im- plementation, Computer Physics Communications180, 1572 (2009)

    G. Alvarez, The density matrix renormalization group for strongly correlated electron systems: a generic im- plementation, Computer Physics Communications180, 1572 (2009)

    2009

  37. [45]

    Kourtis, J

    S. Kourtis, J. van den Brink, and M. Daghofer, Exact diagonalization results for resonant inelastic x-ray scat- tering spectra of one-dimensional mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B85, 064423 (2012)

    2012

  38. [46]

    Tsutsui, T

    K. Tsutsui, T. Tohyama, and S. Maekawa, Resonant in- elastic x-ray scattering in one-dimensional copper oxides, Physical Review B61, 7180–7182 (2000)

    2000

  39. [47]

    Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension (Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

    T. Giamarchi,Quantum Physics in One Dimension (Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

    2003

  40. [48]

    D. A. Tennant, R. A. Cowley, S. E. Nagler, and A. M. Tsvelik,Measurementofthespin-excitationcontinuumin one-dimensional KCuF3 using neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. B52, 13368 (1995)

    1995

  41. [49]

    I. A. Zaliznyak, C. Broholm, M. Kibune, M. Nohara, and H. Takagi, Anisotropic spin freezing in theS = 1/2 zigzag chain compound SrCuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5370 (1999)

    1999

  42. [50]

    A. C. Walters, T. G. Perring, J.-S. Caux, A. T. Savici, G.D.Gu, C.-C.Lee, W.Ku,andI.A.Zaliznyak,Effectof covalent bonding on magnetism and the missing neutron intensity in copper oxide compounds, Nature Physics5, 867 (2009)

    2009

  43. [51]

    Mourigal, M

    M. Mourigal, M. Enderle, A. Klöpperpieper, J.-S. Caux, A. Stunault, and H. M. Rønnow, Fractional spinon ex- citations in the quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chain, Nature Physics9, 435 (2013)

    2013

  44. [52]

    Schlappa, K

    J. Schlappa, K. Wohlfeld, K. J. Zhou, M. Mourigal, M. W. Haverkort, V. N. Strocov, L. Hozoi, C. Mon- ney, S. Nishimoto, S. Singh, A. Revcolevschi, J. S. Caux, L. Patthey, H. M. Rønnow, J. van den Brink, and T. Schmitt, Spin–orbital separation in the quasi- one-dimensional Mott...

    2012

  45. [53]

    Schlappa, U

    J. Schlappa, U. Kumar, K. J. Zhou, S. Singh, M. Mouri- gal, V. N. Strocov, A. Revcolevschi, L. Patthey, H. M. Rønnow, S. Johnston, and T. Schmitt, Probing multi- spinon excitations outside of the two-spinon continuum intheantiferromagneticspinchaincuprateSr 2CuO3,Na- ture Comm...

    2018

  46. [54]

    Kumar, A

    U. Kumar, A. Nag, J. Li, H. C. Robarts, A. C. Walters, M. García-Fernández, R. Saint-Martin, A. Revcolevschi, J. Schlappa, T. Schmitt, S. Johnston, and K.-J. Zhou, Unraveling higher-order contributions to spin excitations probed using resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys....

    2022

  47. [55]

    B. J. Kim, H. Koh, E. Rotenberg, S. J. Oh, H. Eisaki, N. Motoyama, S. Uchida, T. Tohyama, S. Maekawa, Z. X. Shen, and C. Kim, Distinct spinon and holon dispersions inphotoemissionspectralfunctionsfromone-dimensional SrCuO2, Nature Physics2, 397 (2006)

    2006

  48. [56]

    Kumar, A

    U. Kumar, A. Nocera, E. Dagotto, and S. Johnston, Multi-spinon and antiholon excitations probed by reso- 15 nant inelastic x-ray scattering on doped one-dimensional antiferromagnets, New Journal of Physics 20, 073019 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    S. Li, A. Nocera, U. Kumar, and S. Johnston, Particle- hole asymmetry in the dynamical spin and charge re- sponses of corner-shared 1D cuprates, Communications Physics 4, 217 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    L. J. P. Ament, G. Ghiringhelli, M. M. Sala, L. Braicovich, and J. van den Brink, Theoretical demon- stration of how the dispersion of magnetic excitations in cuprate compounds can be determined using resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 117003 (2009)

    2009

  51. [59]

    M. J. Bhaseen, F. H. L. Essler, and A. Grage, Itiner- ancy effects on spin correlations in one-dimensional Mott insulators, Physical Review B71, 020405 (2005)

    2005

  52. [60]

    Klauser, J

    A. Klauser, J. Mossel, J.-S. Caux, and J. Van Den Brink, Spin-Exchange Dynamical Structure Factor of theS = 1/2 Heisenberg chain, Physical Review Letters 106, 157205 (2011)

    2011

  53. [61]

    C. Jia, K. Wohlfeld, Y. Wang, B. Moritz, and T. P. De- vereaux, Using RIXS to uncover elementary charge and spin excitations, Phys. Rev. X6, 021020 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    Forte, M

    F. Forte, M. Cuoco, C. Noce, and J. van den Brink, Doping dependence of magnetic excitations of one- dimensional cuprates as probed by resonant inelastic x- ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B83, 245133 (2011)

    2011

  55. [63]

    Scheie, P

    A. Scheie, P. Laurell, A. M. Samarakoon, B. Lake, S. E. Nagler, G. E. Granroth, S. Okamoto, G. Alvarez, and D. A. Tennant, Witnessing entanglement in quantum magnets using neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. B 103, 224434 (2021)

    2021

  56. [64]

    Laurell, A

    P. Laurell, A. Scheie, E. Dagotto, and D. A. Tennant, Witnessing entanglement and quantum correlations in condensed matter: a review, arXiv:2405.10899 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    T. Ren, Y. Shen, S. F. R. TenHuisen, J. Sears, W. He, M. H. Upton, D. Casa, P. Becker, M. Mitrano, M. P. M. Dean, and R. M. Konik, Witnessing quantum entanglement using resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, arXiv:2404.05850 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    Weber, F

    M. Weber, F. F. Assaad, and M. Hohenadler, Phonon spectral function of the one-dimensional Holstein- Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B91, 235150 (2015)

    2015

  59. [67]

    Johnston, F

    S. Johnston, F. Vernay, B. Moritz, Z.-X. Shen, N. Na- gaosa, J. Zaanen, and T. P. Devereaux, Systematic study of electron-phonon coupling to oxygen modes across the cuprates, Phys. Rev. B82, 064513 (2010)

    2010

  60. [68]

    Tseng, J

    Y. Tseng, J. Thomas, W. Zhang, E. Paris, P. Puphal, R. Bag, G. Deng, T. C. Asmara, V. N. Strocov, S. Singh, E. Pomjakushina, U. Kumar, A. Nocera, H. M. Røn- now, S. Johnston, and T. Schmitt, Crossover of high- energy spin fluctuations from collective triplons to local- ized ma...

    2022

  61. [69]

    Z. Chen, Y. Wang, S. N. Rebec, T. Jia, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, B. Moritz, R. G. Moore, T. P. Devereaux, and Z.- X. Shen, Anomalously strong near-neighbor attraction in doped 1D cuprate chains, Science373, 1235 (2021)

    2021

  62. [70]

    Y. Wang, Z. Chen, T. Shi, B. Moritz, Z.-X. Shen, and T. P. Devereaux, Phonon-mediated long-range attractive interaction in one-dimensional cuprates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 197003 (2021)

    2021

  63. [71]

    Y. Chen, Y. Wang, C. Jia, B. Moritz, A. M. Shvaika, J. K. Freericks, and T. P. Devereaux, Theory for time- resolved resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B 99, 104306 (2019)

    2019

  64. [72]

    Zawadzki, A

    K. Zawadzki, A. Nocera, and A. E. Feiguin, A time- dependent momentum-resolved scattering approach to core-level spectroscopies, SciPost Phys.15, 166 (2023)

    2023

  65. [73]

    Jeckelmann, Dynamical density-matrix renormalization-group method, Phys

    E. Jeckelmann, Dynamical density-matrix renormalization-group method, Phys. Rev. B 66, 045114 (2002)

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.