Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Selective inference for effect modification via the lasso

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1705.08020 v4 pith:FM7TNOE2 submitted 2017-05-22 stat.ME math.STstat.TH

classification stat.MEmath.STstat.TH
keywords effectmodelmodificationcovariatesinferencenuisanceparametersselected
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Effect modification occurs when the effect of the treatment on an outcome varies according to the level of other covariates and often has important implications in decision making. When there are tens or hundreds of covariates, it becomes necessary to use the observed data to select a simpler model for effect modification and then make valid statistical inference. We propose a two stage procedure to solve this problem. First, we use Robinson's transformation to decouple the nuisance parameters from the treatment effect of interest and use machine learning algorithms to estimate the nuisance parameters. Next, after plugging in the estimates of the nuisance parameters, we use the Lasso to choose a low-complexity model for effect modification. Compared to a full model consisting of all the covariates, the selected model is much more interpretable. Compared to the univariate subgroup analyses, the selected model greatly reduces the number of false discoveries. We show that the conditional selective inference for the selected model is asymptotically valid given the rate assumptions in classical semiparametric regression. Extensive simulation studies are conducted to verify the asymptotic results and an epidemiological application is used to demonstrate the method.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Causal Stability Selection

    stat.ME 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Causal stability selection produces effect-modifier sets with explicit non-asymptotic false-positive bounds by combining cross-fitted CATE estimation and integrated path stability selection.

  2. Causal Stability Selection

    stat.ME 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Causal stability selection identifies treatment effect modifiers with a non-asymptotic bound on expected false positives by integrating cross-fitted CATE estimation and stability selection.

Pith tools