Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Satellite design optimization for differential lift and drag applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.16612 v1 pith:FMJEGALH submitted 2023-03-29 physics.space-ph

classification physics.space-ph
keywords controldifferentialsatellitesforcesliftsatellitevleoachieving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Utilizing differential atmospheric forces in the Very Low Earth Orbits (VLEO) regime for the control of the relative motion within a satellite formation is a promising option as any thrusting device has tremendous effects on the mission capacity due to the limited weight and size restrictions of small satellites. One possible approach to increase the available control forces is to reduce the mass of the respective satellites as well as to increase the available surface area. However, satellites of these characteristics suffer from rapid orbital decay and consequently have a reduced service lifetime. Therefore, achieving higher control forces is in contradiction to achieving a minimum orbital decay of the satellites, which currently represents one of the biggest challenges in the VLEO regime. In this work, the geometry of a given reference satellite, a 3UCubeSat, is optimized under the consideration of different surface material properties for differential lift and drag control applications while simultaneously ensuring a sustained VLEO operation. Notably, not only the consideration of sustainability but also the optimization with regard to differential lift is new in literature. It was shown that the advantageous geometries strongly depend on the type of gas-surface interaction and thus, two different final designs, one for each extreme type, are presented. In both cases, improvements in all relevant parameters could be achieved solely via geometry adaptions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools