REVIEW 6 cited by
Updated fundamental constant constraints from Planck 2018 data and possible relations to the Hubble tension
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Updated fundamental constant constraints from Planck 2018 data and possible relations to the Hubble tension
read the original abstract
We present updated constraints on the variation of the fine structure constant, $\alpha_{\rm EM}$, and effective electron rest mass, $m_{\rm e}$, during the cosmological recombination era. These two fundamental constants directly affect the ionization history at redshift $z\simeq 1100$ and thus modify the temperature and polarisation anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) measured precisely with {\it Planck }. The constraints on $\alpha_{\rm EM}$ tighten slightly due to improved {\it Planck} 2018 polarisation data but otherwise remain similar to previous CMB analysis. However, a comparison with the 2015 constraints reveals a mildly discordant behaviour for $m_{\rm e}$, which from CMB data alone is found below its local value. Adding baryon acoustic oscillation data brings $m_{\rm e}$ back to the fiducial value, $m_{\rm e}=(1.0078\pm0.0067) m_{\rm e,0}$, and also drives the Hubble parameter to $H_0=69.1\pm 1.2$ [in units of ${\rm km \, s^{-1} \, Mpc^{-1} }$]. Further adding supernova data yields $m_{\rm e}=(1.0190\pm0.0055) m_{\rm e,0}$ with $H_0=71.24\pm0.96$. We perform several comparative analyses using the latest cosmological recombination calculations to further understand the various effects. Our results indicate that a single-parameter extension allowing for a slightly increased value of $m_{\rm e}$ ($\simeq 3.5\sigma$ above $m_{\rm e,0}$) could play a role in the Hubble tension.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Hubble tension: the shape wall
Late-time modifications to the expansion history can raise H0 by at most about 2% (conservative) to 3.7% (permissive) if the CMB acoustic scale is fixed.
-
Geometric Constraints on the Pre-Recombination Expansion History from the Hubble Tension
Model-independent reconstruction shows that early-universe modifications resolving the Hubble tension exist at the background level, requiring a smooth ~15% pre-recombination expansion rate enhancement.
-
Running into tension: primordial black holes from ultra-slow-roll inflation, spectral running, and the Hubble tension
EDE models increase inferred α_s from CMB data, strengthening tension with USR PBH models that predict negative running.
-
Cosmological Viability of Exponential Infrared $f(T)$ Gravity
Exponential IR f(T) gravity Model I alleviates Hubble tension but is disfavoured by combined Planck/ACT/SPT+DESI+Pantheon+ data; Model II is ruled out because background constraints force unphysical shifts in CMB parameters.
-
The Hubble tension: A decade review
Pure early or late fixes to the Hubble tension are tightly constrained; remaining options are combined early-late interacting dark energy or new physics at the local-to-homogeneous transition.
-
The Hubble tension: A decade review
A review summarizing the Hubble tension as a persistent crisis and discussing resolutions via interacting dark energy models that combine early-time and late-time modifications.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.