Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 59 references

Fluctuation-Induced Magnetoelectric Effect in Noncentrosymmetric Superconductors

T0 review · 0 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Superconducting fluctuations generate a magnetoelectric contribution to spin susceptibility in noncentrosymmetric materials even for s-wave pairing.

desk verdict The paper derives a fluctuation-induced magnetoelectric term in spin susceptibility for pure s-wave pairing in Rashba 2D systems above Tc, forbidden in centrosymmetric cases. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.26261 v1 pith:FMVAFC6Y submitted 2026-06-24 cond-mat.supr-con

Jaglul Hasan , Daniel Shaffer , Maxim Dzero , Alex Levchenko This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords superconductingfluctuationsmagnetoelectriceffectnoncentrosymmetricsuperconductorsspinsusceptibilityNMRrelaxationrateRashbaspin-orbitcouplings-wavepairingtwo-dimensionalmaterials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper examines the impact of superconducting fluctuations above the transition temperature on spin susceptibility and NMR relaxation in two-dimensional noncentrosymmetric materials that include linear Rashba spin-orbit coupling. It establishes that these fluctuations produce an extra term in the spin susceptibility by forming Cooper pairs, which creates a magnetoelectric effect that is allowed only when inversion symmetry is absent. This positive contribution competes with the usual drop in susceptibility caused by reduced density of states and localization effects. The same fluctuations raise the NMR relaxation rate above the normal-state Korringa value, and spin-orbit coupling strengthens that increase.

What carries the argument

Fluctuation-induced Cooper pairs that contribute directly to spin susceptibility when Rashba spin-orbit coupling breaks inversion symmetry.

What would settle it

A measurement showing no additional positive contribution to spin susceptibility or no enhancement of the NMR relaxation rate above the normal-state value in a noncentrosymmetric two-dimensional superconductor just above Tc would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Superconducting fluctuations give rise to a direct contribution to the spin susceptibility through fluctuation-induced Cooper pairs. This fluctuation-driven magnetoelectric effect is possible even for purely s-wave singlet pairing, a mechanism that is forbidden in centrosymmetric systems. It competes with the reduction of the susceptibility below the Pauli value arising from the combined effects of the suppression of the density of states and quantum-interference localization processes. In contrast, superconducting fluctuations enhance the NMR relaxation rate above its normal-state Korringa value, with spin-orbit coupling providing an additional amplification of this effect.

Load-bearing premise

The microscopic model with linear Rashba spin-orbit coupling and the treatment of superconducting fluctuations above Tc for arbitrary impurity scattering strength in two-dimensional noncentrosymmetric materials.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Spin susceptibility receives a fluctuation-driven term that can offset Pauli suppression in noncentrosymmetric systems.
  • NMR relaxation rate rises above the Korringa value, with the rise amplified by spin-orbit coupling.
  • The magnetoelectric effect appears for s-wave singlet pairing precisely because inversion symmetry is absent.
  • The competition between the new positive term and conventional suppression determines the net temperature dependence of susceptibility above Tc.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar fluctuation contributions could appear in other response functions such as thermoelectric or spin-Hall coefficients in the same materials.
  • The mechanism suggests that magnetoelectric probes might detect fluctuating Cooper pairs even when direct pairing signatures are weak.
  • Extensions to finite magnetic fields or to three-dimensional noncentrosymmetric crystals would test how the effect scales with dimensionality and symmetry.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a microscopic theory of superconducting fluctuations above Tc in two-dimensional noncentrosymmetric systems with Rashba spin-orbit coupling and arbitrary impurity scattering. It demonstrates that these fluctuations produce an additional, direct contribution to the spin susceptibility arising from fluctuation-induced Cooper pairs; this magnetoelectric term survives for purely s-wave singlet pairing because inversion symmetry is broken. The new term competes with the usual suppression of susceptibility from density-of-states reduction and weak-localization corrections, while the NMR relaxation rate is enhanced above the Korringa value, with further amplification from spin-orbit coupling.

Significance. If the central result is confirmed, the work identifies a fluctuation-driven magnetoelectric mechanism that is allowed only when inversion symmetry is absent and that operates even for conventional s-wave pairing. The explicit microscopic treatment that retains arbitrary impurity scattering strength is a clear strength, as is the direct comparison between the new fluctuation term and the competing DOS/localization effects. These features make the predictions potentially testable in NMR experiments on interface or noncentrosymmetric superconductors above Tc.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that the fluctuation term 'competes with' DOS suppression, but the main text should quantify the relative magnitude of the two contributions as a function of temperature and disorder strength (e.g., via an explicit plot or scaling relation) to make the competition concrete.
  2. Notation for the Rashba parameter, impurity scattering rate, and fluctuation propagator should be introduced once in a dedicated 'Model' section and then used consistently; occasional redefinitions in later sections would improve readability.
  3. Figure captions should explicitly state the values of the Rashba strength and impurity scattering rate used in each panel so that the plotted curves can be reproduced without consulting the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No major comments were raised in the report, so we have no specific points requiring rebuttal or revision at this stage. We will incorporate any minor suggestions in the revised manuscript if provided.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The derivation begins from an explicit microscopic Hamiltonian incorporating linear Rashba spin-orbit coupling and proceeds via standard diagrammatic summation of superconducting fluctuations above Tc for arbitrary impurity scattering. No equation or central claim reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, a self-referential definition, or a load-bearing self-citation chain; the magnetoelectric contribution is obtained directly from the broken-inversion-symmetry-allowed diagrams and competes with independently computed DOS and localization corrections. The result is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard microscopic model with linear Rashba SOC and conventional fluctuation theory above Tc; no free parameters or invented entities are indicated in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Microscopic Hamiltonian includes linear Rashba spin-orbit coupling for noncentrosymmetric 2D materials
    Invoked to enable the magnetoelectric term for s-wave pairing.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fluctuation-Induced Magnetoelectric Effect in Noncentrosymmetric Superconductors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FMVAFC6Y

@misc{pith2026260626261,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fluctuation-Induced Magnetoelectric Effect in Noncentrosymmetric Superconductors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FMVAFC6Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.26261}
}
abstract

We study the effect of superconducting fluctuations on the spin susceptibility and NMR relaxation rate in noncentrosymmetric two-dimensional materials above the superconducting transition temperature, considering arbitrary strength of impurity scattering. Employing a microscopic model with linear Rashba spin-orbit coupling, we show that superconducting fluctuations give rise to a direct contribution to the spin susceptibility through fluctuation-induced Cooper pairs. This fluctuation-driven magnetoelectric effect is possible even for purely $s$-wave singlet pairing, a mechanism that is forbidden in centrosymmetric systems. It competes with the reduction of the susceptibility below the Pauli value arising from the combined effects of the suppression of the density of states and quantum-interference localization processes. In contrast, superconducting fluctuations enhance the NMR relaxation rate above its normal-state Korringa value, with spin-orbit coupling providing an additional amplification of this effect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26261 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Aslamazov-Larkin (AL) diagram for the spin-spin correla [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. In the top panel, the diagram on the left represents the block [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The upper panel shows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The integration contour in the complex frequency plane. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Diagrammatic representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The second diagram contributing to the vertex block [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The spinor indicesabandcdrefer to the spin states of the carriers joining to form the pair and releas- ing after its subsequent decay, respectively

    describes pairing fluctuations aboveT c, whereqis the col- lective momentum andΩ m is the Matsubara frequency of the virtual Cooper pair. The spinor indicesabandcdrefer to the spin states of the carriers joining to form the pair and releas- ing after its subsequent decay, respectively. Since we limit our attention to temperatures close to the transition t...

  2. [2]

    Mineev and Kirill V

    Vladimir P. Mineev and Kirill V . Samokhin,Introduction to Un- conventional Superconductivity(CRC Press, 1999)

    1999

  3. [3]

    847 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012)

    Ernst Bauer and Manfred Sigrist, eds.,Non-Centrosymmetric Superconductors: Introduction and Overview, Lecture Notes in Physics, V ol. 847 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012)

    2012

  4. [4]

    Evidence for two-dimensional Ising superconductivity in gated MoS 2,

    J. M. Lu, O. Zheliuk, I. Leermakers, N. F. Q. Yuan, U. Zeitler, K. T. Law, and J. T. Ye, “Evidence for two-dimensional Ising superconductivity in gated MoS 2,” Science350, 1353–1357 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    Superconductivity emerging from a sup- pressed large magnetoresistant state in tungsten ditelluride,

    Defen Kang, Yazhou Zhou, Wei Yi, Chongli Yang, Jing Guo, Youguo Shi, Shan Zhang, Zhe Wang, Chao Zhang, Sheng Jiang, Aiguo Li, Ke Yang, Qi Wu, Guangming Zhang, Liling Sun, and Zhongxian Zhao, “Superconductivity emerging from a sup- pressed large magnetoresistant state in tungsten ditelluride,” Nature Communications6, 7804 (2015)

    2015

  6. [6]

    Characterization of collec- tive ground states in single-layer NbSe 2,

    Miguel M. Ugeda, Aaron J. Bradley, Yi Zhang, Seita On- ishi, Yi Chen, Wei Ruan, Claudia Ojeda-Aristizabal, Hyejin Ryu, Mark T. Edmonds, Hsin-Zon Tsai, Alexander Riss, Sung- Kwan Mo, Dunghai Lee, Alex Zettl, Zahid Hussain, Zhi-Xun Shen, and Michael F. Crommie, “Characterization of collec- tive ground states in single-layer NbSe 2,” Nature Physics12, 92–97 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    Superconductivity protected by spin–valley locking in ion-gated MoS 2,

    Yu Saito, Yasuharu Nakamura, Mohammad Saeed Bahramy, Yoshimitsu Kohama, Jianting Ye, Yuichi Kasahara, Yuji Nak- agawa, Masaru Onga, Masashi Tokunaga, Tsutomu Nojima, Youichi Yanase, and Yoshihiro Iwasa, “Superconductivity protected by spin–valley locking in ion-gated MoS 2,” Nature Physics12, 144–149 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Ising pairing in superconducting NbSe 2 atomic layers,

    Xiaoxiang Xi, Zefang Wang, Weiwei Zhao, Ju-Hyun Park, Kam Tuen Law, Helmuth Berger, L´aszl´o Forr´o, Jie Shan, and Kin Fai Mak, “Ising pairing in superconducting NbSe 2 atomic layers,” Nature Physics12, 139–143 (2016)

    2016

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Superconductivity in Weyl semimetal candidate MoTe2,

    Yanpeng Qi, Pavel G. Naumov, Mazhar N. Ali, Cather- ine R. Rajamathi, Walter Schnelle, Oleg Barkalov, Michael Hanfland, Shu-Chun Wu, Chandra Shekhar, Yan Sun, Vicky S¨uß, Marcus Schmidt, Ulrich Schwarz, Eckhard Pippel, Pe- ter Werner, Reinald Hillebrand, Tobias F ¨orster, Erik...

    2016

  2. [10]

    Gate-induced superconductivity in atomi- cally thin MoS2 crystals,

    Davide Costanzo, Sanghyun Jo, Helmuth Berger, and Al- berto F. Morpurgo, “Gate-induced superconductivity in atomi- cally thin MoS2 crystals,” Nature Nanotechnology11, 339–344 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    Spectroscopy of bulk and few-layer superconducting NbSe 2 with van der waals tunnel junctions,

    T. Dvir, F. Massee, L. Attias, M. Khodas, M. Aprili, C. H. L. Quay, and H. Steinberg, “Spectroscopy of bulk and few-layer superconducting NbSe 2 with van der waals tunnel junctions,” Nature Communications9, 598 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Tuning ising superconductivity with layer and spin–orbit coupling in two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides,

    Sergio C. de la Barrera, Michael R. Sinko, Devashish P. Gopalan, Nikhil Sivadas, Kyle L. Seyler, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Adam W. Tsen, Xiaodong Xu, Di Xiao, and Benjamin M. Hunt, “Tuning ising superconductivity with layer and spin–orbit coupling in two-dimensional t...

    2018

  5. [13]

    An un- usual continuous paramagnetic-limited superconducting phase transition in 2D NbSe2,

    Egon Sohn, Xiaoxiang Xi, Wen-Yu He, Shengwei Jiang, Zefang Wang, Kaifei Kang, Ju-Hyun Park, Helmuth Berger, L ´aszl´o Forr´o, Kam Tuen Law, Jie Shan, and Kin Fai Mak, “An un- usual continuous paramagnetic-limited superconducting phase transition in 2D NbSe2,” Nature Materials1...

    2018

  6. [14]

    Gate-induced su- perconductivity in a monolayer topological insulator,

    Ebrahim Sajadi, Tauno Palomaki, Zaiyao Fei, Wenjin Zhao, Philip Bement, Christian Olsen, Silvia Luescher, Xiaodong Xu, Joshua A. Folk, and David H. Cobden, “Gate-induced su- perconductivity in a monolayer topological insulator,” Science 362, 922–925 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Electrically tunable low- density superconductivity in a monolayer topological insula- tor,

    Valla Fatemi, Sanfeng Wu, Yuan Cao, Landry Bretheau, Quinn D. Gibson, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Robert J. Cava, and Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, “Electrically tunable low- density superconductivity in a monolayer topological insula- tor,” Science362, 926–929 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    Two-fold symmetric superconductivity in few-layer NbSe 2,

    Alex Hamill, Brett Heischmidt, Egon Sohn, Daniel Shaffer, Kan-Ting Tsai, Xi Zhang, Xiaoxiang Xi, Alexey Suslov, Hel- muth Berger, L´aszl´o Forr´o, Fiona J. Burnell, Jie Shan, Kin Fai Mak, Rafael M. Fernandes, Ke Wang, and Vlad S. Pribiag, “Two-fold symmetric superconductivity ...

    2021

  9. [17]

    Superconductivity in twisted bi- layer WSe2,

    Yiyu Xia, Zhongdong Han, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Jie Shan, and Kin Fai Mak, “Superconductivity in twisted bi- layer WSe2,” Nature637, 833–838 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    The superconducting diode effect,

    Muhammad Nadeem, Michael S. Fuhrer, and Xiaolin Wang, “The superconducting diode effect,” Nature Reviews Physics5, 558–577 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Superconducting diode effects: Mechanisms, materials and applications,

    Jiajun Ma, Ruiya Zhan, and Xiao Lin, “Superconducting diode effects: Mechanisms, materials and applications,” Advanced Physics Research4, 2400180 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Theories of super- conducting diode effects,

    Daniel Shaffer and Alex Levchenko, “Theories of super- conducting diode effects,” (2025), arXiv:2510.25864 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    2025

  13. [21]

    Nonreciprocal re- sponses from non-centrosymmetric quantum materials,

    Yoshinori Tokura and Naoto Nagaosa, “Nonreciprocal re- sponses from non-centrosymmetric quantum materials,” Nature Communications9, 3740 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Nonreciprocal transport and optical phenomena in quantum materials,

    Naoto Nagaosa and Youichi Yanase, “Nonreciprocal transport and optical phenomena in quantum materials,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics15, 63–83 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Nonreciprocal charge transport in noncen- trosymmetric superconductors,

    Ryohei Wakatsuki, Yu Saito, Shintaro Hoshino, Yuki M. Ita- hashi, Toshiya Ideue, Motohiko Ezawa, Yoshihiro Iwasa, and Naoto Nagaosa, “Nonreciprocal charge transport in noncen- trosymmetric superconductors,” Science Advances3, e1602390 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Nonreciprocal current in noncentrosymmetric Rashba superconductors,

    Ryohei Wakatsuki and Naoto Nagaosa, “Nonreciprocal current in noncentrosymmetric Rashba superconductors,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026601 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Nonreciprocal charge transport in two- dimensional noncentrosymmetric superconductors,

    Shintaro Hoshino, Ryohei Wakatsuki, Keita Hamamoto, and Naoto Nagaosa, “Nonreciprocal charge transport in two- dimensional noncentrosymmetric superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B98, 054510 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    Rectification and nonlinear Hall effect by fluctuating finite-momentum Cooper pairs,

    Akito Daido and Youichi Yanase, “Rectification and nonlinear Hall effect by fluctuating finite-momentum Cooper pairs,” Phys. Rev. Res.6, L022009 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Enhanced nonlin- ear Hall effect by Cooper pairs near the superconducting phase transition,

    Zi-Hao Dong, Hui Yang, and Yi Zhang, “Enhanced nonlin- ear Hall effect by Cooper pairs near the superconducting phase transition,” Phys. Rev. B111, 155120 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    Magnetochiral anisotropy in strained super- conducting transition metal dichalcogenides,

    Joaquim Telles de Miranda, Maxim Khodas, and Alex Levchenko, “Magnetochiral anisotropy in strained super- conducting transition metal dichalcogenides,” (2026), arXiv:2606.05302 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2026 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Electrical magnetochiral anisotropy in Rashba superconductors,

    Joaquim Telles de Miranda, Maxim Khodas, and Alex Levchenko, “Electrical magnetochiral anisotropy in Rashba superconductors,” (2026), arXiv:2606.19421 [cond-mat.supr- con]

    2026 arXiv

  22. [30]

    The dynamical theory of nu- clear induction,

    R. K. Wangsness and F. Bloch, “The dynamical theory of nu- clear induction,” Phys. Rev.89, 728–739 (1953)

    1953

  23. [31]

    On the theory of relaxation processes,

    A. G. Redfield, “On the theory of relaxation processes,” IBM J. 10 Res. Dev.1, 19–31 (1957)

    1957

  24. [32]

    Nuclear magnetic relaxation and resonnance line shift in metals,

    J. Korringa, “Nuclear magnetic relaxation and resonnance line shift in metals,” Physica16, 601–610 (1950)

    1950

  25. [33]

    Nuclear relaxation in supercon- ducting aluminum,

    L. C. Hebel and C. P. Slichter, “Nuclear relaxation in supercon- ducting aluminum,” Physical Review107, 901–902 (1957)

    1957

  26. [34]

    A. I. Larkin and A. Varlamov,Theory of Fluctuations in Super- conductors(OUP Oxford, 2005)

    2005

  27. [35]

    Effect of fluctuations on electronic properties above the superconducting transition,

    Elihu Abrahams, Martha Redi, and James W. F. Woo, “Effect of fluctuations on electronic properties above the superconducting transition,” Phys. Rev. B1, 208–213 (1970)

    1970

  28. [36]

    The influence of fluctua- tion pairing of electrons on the conductivity of normal metal,

    L.G. Aslamasov and A.I. Larkin, “The influence of fluctua- tion pairing of electrons on the conductivity of normal metal,” Physics Letters A26, 238–239 (1968)

    1968

  29. [37]

    The critical fluctuation of the order parameter in type-II superconductors,

    Kazumi Maki, “The critical fluctuation of the order parameter in type-II superconductors,” Progress of Theoretical Physics39, 897–906 (1968)

    1968

  30. [38]

    Microwave, flux flow, and fluctuation resistance of dirty type-II superconductors,

    Richard S. Thompson, “Microwave, flux flow, and fluctuation resistance of dirty type-II superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B1, 327–333 (1970)

    1970

  31. [39]

    Fluctuation effect on the nuclear magnetic relaxation in clean superconductors,

    Toshioka Maniv and Shlomo Alexander, “Fluctuation effect on the nuclear magnetic relaxation in clean superconductors,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics9, 1699–1710 (1976)

    1976

  32. [40]

    Effects of super- conducting fluctuations on nmr relaxation rate,

    Kazuhiro Kuboki and Hidetoshi Fukuyama, “Effects of super- conducting fluctuations on nmr relaxation rate,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.58, 376 (1989)

    1989

  33. [41]

    Effects of superconducting fluctuations on the NMR relaxation ratet −1 1 of two-dimensional systems abovet c,

    J ¨urgen Heym, “Effects of superconducting fluctuations on the NMR relaxation ratet −1 1 of two-dimensional systems abovet c,” J. Low Temp. Phys.89, 869 (1992)

    1992

  34. [42]

    Effect of supercon- ducting fluctuations on spin susceptibility and NMR relaxation rate,

    Mohit Randeria and Andrei A. Varlamov, “Effect of supercon- ducting fluctuations on spin susceptibility and NMR relaxation rate,” Phys. Rev. B50, 10401(R)–10404(R) (1994)

    1994

  35. [43]

    Effect of fluctuations on the NMR relaxation beyond the Abrikosov vortex state,

    A. Glatz, A. Galda, and A. A. Varlamov, “Effect of fluctuations on the NMR relaxation beyond the Abrikosov vortex state,” Phys. Rev. B92, 054513 (2015)

    2015

  36. [44]

    Singular- ity in the quasiparticle interaction function in a 2D Fermi gas,

    M. A. Baranov, M. Yu. Kagan, and M. S. Mar’enko, “Singular- ity in the quasiparticle interaction function in a 2D Fermi gas,” JETP Lett.58, 709 (1993)

    1993

  37. [45]

    Nonanalytic behavior of the spin susceptibility in clean Fermi systems,

    D. Belitz, T. R. Kirkpatrick, and Thomas V ojta, “Nonanalytic behavior of the spin susceptibility in clean Fermi systems,” Phys. Rev. B55, 9452–9462 (1997)

    1997

  38. [46]

    Leading temperature corrections to Fermi-liquid theory in two dimensions,

    Gennady Y . Chitov and Andrew J. Millis, “Leading temperature corrections to Fermi-liquid theory in two dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 5337–5340 (2001)

    2001

  39. [47]

    Singular correc- tions to the Fermi-liquid theory,

    Andrey V . Chubukov and Dmitrii L. Maslov, “Singular correc- tions to the Fermi-liquid theory,” Phys. Rev. B69, 121102(R) (2004)

    2004

  40. [48]

    Thermodynamics of a Fermi liquid in a magnetic field,

    Joseph Betouras, Dmitri Efremov, and Andrey Chubukov, “Thermodynamics of a Fermi liquid in a magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. B72, 115112 (2005)

    2005

  41. [49]

    Temperature dependence of the spin susceptibility of a clean Fermi gas with repulsion,

    G. Schwiete and K. B. Efetov, “Temperature dependence of the spin susceptibility of a clean Fermi gas with repulsion,” Phys. Rev. B74, 165108 (2006)

    2006

  42. [50]

    Temperature dependence of spin susceptibility in two-dimensional Fermi liquid systems,

    A. Shekhter and A. M. Finkel’stein, “Temperature dependence of spin susceptibility in two-dimensional Fermi liquid systems,” Phys. Rev. B74, 205122 (2006)

    2006

  43. [51]

    Symmetry of bands in wurzite-type crystals. 1. symmetry of bands disregarding spin-orbit interaction,

    E. I. Rashba, “Symmetry of bands in wurzite-type crystals. 1. symmetry of bands disregarding spin-orbit interaction,” Sov. Phys. Solid. State1, 368 (1959)

    1959

  44. [52]

    Properties of a 2D electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy,

    Yu. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, “Properties of a 2D electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy,” Sov. Phys. JETP Lett.39, 66 (1984)

    1984

  45. [53]

    Magne- toelectric effects in conductors with mirror isomer symmetry,

    L. S. Levitov, Yu. V . Nazarov, and G. M. Eliashberg, “Magne- toelectric effects in conductors with mirror isomer symmetry,” Sov. Phys. - JETP61, 133 (1985)

    1985

  46. [54]

    Elec- tron spin susceptibility of superconductors,

    L. S. Levitov, Yu. V . Nazarov, and G. M. Eliashberg, “Elec- tron spin susceptibility of superconductors,” JETP Lett.41, 228 (1985)

    1985

  47. [55]

    Magnetoelectric effect in polar supercon- ductors,

    Victor M. Edelstein, “Magnetoelectric effect in polar supercon- ductors,” Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 2004–2007 (1995)

    2004

  48. [56]

    Magnetoelectric effect in dirty supercon- ductors with broken mirror symmetry,

    Victor M. Edelstein, “Magnetoelectric effect in dirty supercon- ductors with broken mirror symmetry,” Phys. Rev. B72, 172501 (2005)

    2005

  49. [57]

    Spin suscep- tibility in superconductors without inversion symmetry,

    P. A. Frigeri, D. F. Agterberg, and M. Sigrist, “Spin suscep- tibility in superconductors without inversion symmetry,” New Journal of Physics6, 115 (2004)

    2004

  50. [58]

    Nuclear magnetic relaxation rate in a noncentrosymmetric su- perconductor,

    N. Hayashi, K. Wakabayashi, P. A. Frigeri, and M. Sigrist, “Nuclear magnetic relaxation rate in a noncentrosymmetric su- perconductor,” Phys. Rev. B73, 092508 (2006)

    2006

  51. [59]

    Ginzburg-Landau theory for impure su- perconductors of polar symmetry,

    Victor M. Edelstein, “Ginzburg-Landau theory for impure su- perconductors of polar symmetry,” Phys. Rev. B103, 094507 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.