Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Process Supervision-Guided Policy Optimization for Code Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.17621 v2 pith:FMWYV2BB submitted 2024-10-23 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords codegenerationlearningprmsdensefeedbackprocessrewards
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) with unit test feedback has enhanced large language models' (LLMs) code generation, but relies on sparse rewards provided only after complete code evaluation, limiting learning efficiency and incremental improvements. When generated code fails all unit tests, no learning signal is received, hindering progress on complex tasks. To address this, we propose a Process Reward Model (PRM) that delivers dense, line-level feedback on code correctness during generation, mimicking human code refinement and providing immediate guidance. We explore various strategies for training PRMs and integrating them into the RL framework, finding that using PRMs both as dense rewards and for value function initialization significantly boosts performance. Our experimental results also highlight the effectiveness of PRMs in enhancing RL-driven code generation, especially for long-horizon scenarios.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Binary: Turning Partial Success into Dense Verifiable Rewards for Reinforcement Learning in Code Generation

    cs.LG 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    VeRPO turns partial test-suite success into dense, difficulty-weighted rewards for RL code generation, beating GRPO by up to 8.8 pass@1 points at negligible cost.

  2. Improving LLM-Generated Code Quality with GRPO

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adding a hand-built code-quality score to the GRPO reward makes a 3B model produce code that blind raters prefer, but evidence rests on one model and a synthetic benchmark.

  3. CRScore++: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Tool and AI Feedback for Code Review

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A two-stage SFT+DPO pipeline using linter and code-smell tool outputs plus an LLM judge improves generated code review comments and appears to transfer from Python to Java and JavaScript, though the judge-based evalua...

Pith tools