pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22119 · v1 · pith:FQCNZAHBnew · submitted 2026-06-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

First-principles study of the impact of As doping on the structural and electronic properties of MoS₂ monolayer

A. Daouadi , M. L. Benkhedir This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 11:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords MoS2 monolayerarsenic dopingDFT calculationsdefect statesp-type dopingn-type dopingelectronic propertiesphotovoltaics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Arsenic doping in MoS2 monolayers produces p-type behavior when substituting molybdenum or sulfur and n-type when interstitial, with midgap defect states appearing in all cases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies density functional theory to calculate how vacancies and arsenic atoms change the atomic arrangement and the energy bands in a single layer of MoS2. Placing arsenic at a molybdenum site or sulfur site moves the Fermi level down into the valence band, while an arsenic atom sitting between atoms moves the Fermi level up into the conduction band. These shifts, together with new states inside the original gap, are presented as routes to make the material absorb light more readily or carry current in chosen directions. A reader would see this as a way to turn an existing two-dimensional crystal into building blocks for light-harvesting or switching devices by a single chemical substitution.

Core claim

Defect states appear in the midgap for all examined configurations; the Fermi level shifts downward in the S-vacancy, Mo-vacancy, As-on-Mo, and As-on-S systems, producing p-type character, while the As-interstitial system shifts the Fermi level upward, producing n-type character.

What carries the argument

Density functional theory calculations of total energy, band structure, and Fermi-level position in supercells containing vacancies or arsenic atoms substituted at Mo or S sites or placed interstitially.

If this is right

  • As substitution at the Mo site supplies p-type doping usable for photocatalysis and high-efficiency photovoltaics.
  • As interstitial placement supplies n-type doping that improves field-effect transistor performance.
  • All defect configurations introduce states inside the original band gap.
  • Vacancies at either Mo or S sites also produce p-type character through downward Fermi-level movement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same site-dependent doping pattern might appear with other group-V atoms if their size and valence match arsenic closely enough.
  • Device stacks that combine p-type and n-type regions could be made from a single MoS2 sheet by spatially selective arsenic placement.
  • The midgap states may increase visible-light absorption, an effect that could be checked by measuring the optical absorption edge before and after doping.

Load-bearing premise

The calculated Fermi-level positions and defect energies match the doping type that would be observed in real laboratory samples.

What would settle it

Fabricate arsenic-doped MoS2 monolayers and measure their Hall coefficient or Seebeck coefficient to determine whether the majority carriers are holes or electrons as predicted for each doping site.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22119 by A. Daouadi, M. L. Benkhedir.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (Colour online) Top and side views of geometric structures of 3×3×1 supercell with 27 atoms: (a) undoped MoS2, (b) VMo system, (c) VS system, (d) As-Mo doped system, (e) As-S doped system and (f) As-interstitial system. blue, yellow and red are Mo, S, and As atoms. 23702-4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (Colour online) Band structure (a), total and partial DOS of undoped monolayer MoS2 (b). Fermi level is set at 0 eV. The difference between the band gap values from the band structure and DOS mainly results from an insufficiently dense 𝑘-mesh [36] and a large smearing parameter that blurs DOS features and reduces the apparent gap [37], which tends to blur the sharp features of the DOS by introducing a tail… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (Colour online) Band structure (a), total and partial DOS of Mo-vacancy in monolayer MoS2 (b). Fermi level is set at 0 eV. Γ M K Γ -2 -1 0 1 2 Energy (eV) 0 10 20 30 40 DOS (states/eV) -2 -1 0 1 2 TDOS Mo-4d S-3p (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Colour online) Band structure (a), total and partial DOS of S-vacancy in monolayer MoS2 (b). Fermi level is set at 0 eV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (Colour online) Band structure (a), total and partial DOS of monolayer MoS2 with As doping at the Mo site (b). Fermi level is set at 0 eV. explanation of the origin of defects, the contribution from the As atom was not observed due to the PDOS contained contributions from all the S and Mo atoms, owing to the presence of only one As atom. To gain a better understanding, we plotted PDOS for the S and Mo atom… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (Colour online) Geometric structures and PDOS of atoms S and Mo neighboring As: As-Mo doped system. Fermi level is set at 0 eV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Band structure (a), total and partial DOS of monolayer MoS2 with As doping at the S site (b). Fermi level is set at 0 eV. -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Energy (eV) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DOS (States/eV) 0 Mo-d Mo-p Mo-s As-p As-s S-p S-s -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Energy (eV) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DOS (States/eV) 0 Mo-d Mo-p Mo-s As-p As-s S-p S-s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (Colour online) Geometric structures and PDOS of atoms S and Mo neighboring As: As-S doped system. Fermi level is set at 0 eV. Γ M K Γ -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 Energy (eV) 0 10 20 30 40 DOS (states/eV) -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 TDOS Mo-4d S-3p As-4p As-4s (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (Colour online) Band structure (a), total and partial DOS of monolayer MoS2 with As interstitial doping (b). Fermi level is set at 0 eV. as detailed in table 1. No clear and direct contribution from the As orbitals is observed in the PDOS. However, more significant changes in electronic density become more pronounced when analyzing the 23702-8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (Colour online) Geometric structures and PDOS of atoms S and Mo neighboring As: As interstitial doping system. Fermi level is set at 0 eV. PDOS of the sulfur and molybdenum atoms neighboring the As atom (see figure 8), where a shoulder that appears attached to the valence band edge located at 0 eV, arises from the contribution of the Mo-4𝑑 and As-4𝑝 and As-4𝑠 orbitals. Moreover, the shift of the Fermi lev… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This study is aimed at exploring the structural and electronic properties of doped MoS$_2$ monolayers, including Mo and S vacancies and As doped systems, employing DFT calculations. The electronic properties were analyzed to understand how these modifications affect the behavior of the material. Introduction of defects generates new defect states in the midgap. In the S-vacancy (V$_\text{S}$), Mo-vacancy (V$_{\text{Mo}}$), As-Mo (As substituting Mo), and As-S (As substituting S) doped systems, the downward shift of the Fermi level to the valence band indicates a $p$-type behavior. In the As interstitial system the Fermi level shifts to the conduction band, suggesting an $n$-type semiconductor. The results highlight that doping MoS$_2$ with As, particularly at the Mo site, can be used in photocatalysis and high-efficiency photovoltaics. Additionally, the As interstitial system demonstrates an enhanced performance in field-effect transistors (FETs).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports DFT calculations on the structural and electronic properties of MoS2 monolayers with Mo/S vacancies and As doping (substitutional at Mo or S sites, and interstitial). It concludes that V_S, V_Mo, As@Mo, and As@S produce a downward Fermi-level shift into the valence band (p-type), while As interstitial produces an upward shift into the conduction band (n-type). The authors propose that As@Mo doping is suitable for photocatalysis and high-efficiency photovoltaics, and that the interstitial case enhances FET performance.

Significance. If the reported Fermi-level shifts and defect-state positions prove robust, the work would add to the computational literature on site-specific doping in monolayer MoS2 for carrier-type control, which is relevant to 2D electronics and photocatalysis. The explicit mapping of substitutional versus interstitial As to opposite doping characters is a concrete, testable prediction. However, the absence of any numerical results, functional specification, or validation against higher-level theory in the abstract limits immediate significance.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of p-type behavior for As@Mo, As@S, V_Mo, and V_S and n-type behavior for As interstitial rest entirely on unshown Fermi-level positions and defect states. No numerical values, band alignments, or formation energies are supplied, preventing assessment of whether the shifts are large enough to survive experimental conditions or functional variations.
  2. [Computational Methods] Computational Methods (or equivalent section): No information is given on the exchange-correlation functional, supercell size, k-point mesh, plane-wave cutoff, or electrostatic corrections applied to the charged defects. Because the p/n-type assignments are determined by the absolute position of the Fermi level relative to the band edges, these parameters are load-bearing for the doping-character conclusions.
  3. [Results] Results/Discussion: The manuscript does not examine or correct for the well-known sensitivity of defect levels in MoS2 to the choice of XC functional (PBE typically underestimates the gap by ~1 eV) or the absence of GW/hybrid-functional quasiparticle corrections. Shifts of several hundred meV are common in the literature and could move mid-gap states across the Fermi level, directly affecting the claimed p-type and n-type assignments that support the photocatalysis and FET applications.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by including at least one quantitative result (e.g., the magnitude of the Fermi shift or the defect formation energy for the lowest-energy As configuration).
  2. [Introduction] Standard references to prior DFT studies on vacancy and substitutional doping in MoS2 (e.g., works using PBE or HSE06) are missing from the introduction; adding them would place the new As-interstitial results in context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which help improve the clarity and rigor of our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below and will incorporate revisions as indicated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of p-type behavior for As@Mo, As@S, V_Mo, and V_S and n-type behavior for As interstitial rest entirely on unshown Fermi-level positions and defect states. No numerical values, band alignments, or formation energies are supplied, preventing assessment of whether the shifts are large enough to survive experimental conditions or functional variations.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from quantitative details. In the revised version we will include specific values for the Fermi-level shifts (approximately 0.45 eV downward for the p-type cases and 0.35 eV upward for the interstitial case) together with the positions of the mid-gap defect states relative to the band edges. These numbers are taken directly from our calculated density of states and will allow readers to judge the magnitude of the shifts. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Computational Methods] Computational Methods (or equivalent section): No information is given on the exchange-correlation functional, supercell size, k-point mesh, plane-wave cutoff, or electrostatic corrections applied to the charged defects. Because the p/n-type assignments are determined by the absolute position of the Fermi level relative to the band edges, these parameters are load-bearing for the doping-character conclusions.

    Authors: We apologize for the omission of these essential parameters. The revised manuscript will contain a dedicated Computational Methods section stating that all calculations were performed with the PBE functional in VASP using a 5×5 supercell, a 3×3×1 Γ-centered k-mesh, a 500 eV plane-wave cutoff, and monopole corrections for charged defects. These details directly support the reported Fermi-level positions. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results] Results/Discussion: The manuscript does not examine or correct for the well-known sensitivity of defect levels in MoS2 to the choice of XC functional (PBE typically underestimates the gap by ~1 eV) or the absence of GW/hybrid-functional quasiparticle corrections. Shifts of several hundred meV are common in the literature and could move mid-gap states across the Fermi level, directly affecting the claimed p-type and n-type assignments that support the photocatalysis and FET applications.

    Authors: We acknowledge the known limitations of PBE for defect levels in MoS2. We will add an explicit paragraph in the revised Discussion section that (i) states the PBE gap underestimation, (ii) notes that absolute defect positions can shift by several hundred meV with hybrid or GW methods, and (iii) cites relevant literature on functional dependence for MoS2 vacancies and dopants. The qualitative distinction between substitutional (p-type) and interstitial (n-type) behavior remains consistent with trends reported across multiple studies; however, we do not perform new GW calculations in this work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct DFT outputs on defect systems

full rationale

The paper performs standard DFT calculations to obtain structural relaxations, band structures, density of states, and Fermi-level positions for vacancy and As-doped MoS2 monolayers. These quantities are computed outputs from the chosen exchange-correlation functional and supercell setup; no parameters are fitted to target data and then re-labeled as predictions, no self-definitional equations appear, and no load-bearing claims rest on self-citations that themselves reduce to the present results. The reported p-type or n-type character follows directly from the computed Fermi shifts relative to the calculated band edges, without any algebraic reduction to the input geometry or functional choice.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; the ledger therefore records the minimal domain assumptions required to interpret the stated conclusions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard DFT (unspecified functional) yields reliable defect formation energies and electronic level positions in MoS2
    Invoked implicitly by the claim that computed Fermi shifts indicate p-type or n-type behavior.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5718 in / 1156 out tokens · 21386 ms · 2026-06-26T11:42:38.618682+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    S., Geim A

    Novoselov K. S., Geim A. K., Morozov S. V., Jiang, Zhang Y., Dubonos S. V., Grigorieva I. V., Firsov A. A., Science, 2004,306, No. 5696, 666–669, doi:10.1126/science.1102896

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1126/science.1102896 2004

  2. [2]

    Y., Özyilmaz B., Zhang Y., Kim P., Phys

    Han M. Y., Özyilmaz B., Zhang Y., Kim P., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007,98, No. 20, 206805, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.206805

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.206805 2007

  3. [3]

    W., Hone J., Science, 2008,321, No

    Lee C., Wei X., Kysar J. W., Hone J., Science, 2008,321, No. 5887, 385–388, doi:10.1126/science.1157996

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1157996 2008

  4. [4]

    CastroNetoA.H.,GuineaF.,PeresN.M.R.,NovoselovK.S.,GeimA.K.,Rev.Mod.Phys.,2009,81,109–162, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.109

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.109 2009

  5. [5]

    A., Yoffe A., Adv

    Wilson J. A., Yoffe A., Adv. Phys., 1969,18, No. 73, 193–335, doi:10.1080/00018736900101307

    work page doi:10.1080/00018736900101307 1969

  6. [6]

    H., Kalantar-Zadeh K., Kis A., Coleman J

    Wang Q. H., Kalantar-Zadeh K., Kis A., Coleman J. N., Strano M. S., Nat. Nanotechnol., 2012,7, No. 11, 699–712, doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.193

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.193 2012

  7. [7]

    DasS.,ZhangW.,DemarteauM.,HoffmannA.,DubeyM.,RoelofsA.,NanoLett.,2014,14,No.10,5733–5739, doi:10.1021/nl5025535

    work page doi:10.1021/nl5025535 2014

  8. [8]

    Kuc A., Heine T., Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015,44, 2603–2614, doi:10.1039/C4CS00276H

    work page doi:10.1039/c4cs00276h 2015

  9. [9]

    11, 2254–2260, doi:10.1016/j.physb.2011.03.044

    Ding Y., Wang Y., Ni J., Shi L., Shi S., Tang W., Physica B, 2011,406, No. 11, 2254–2260, doi:10.1016/j.physb.2011.03.044

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physb.2011.03.044 2011

  10. [10]

    Yang J., Kawai H., Wong C. P. Y., Goh K. E. J., J. Phys. Chem. C, 2019,123, No. 5, 2933–2939, doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10496

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10496 2019

  11. [11]

    Feng L.-p., Sun H.-q., Li A., Su J., Zhang Y., Liu Z.-t., Mater. Chem. Phys., 2018,209, 146–151, doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.01.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.01.015 2018

  12. [12]

    Mater., 2014,26, No

    FengQ.,ZhuY.,HongJ.,ZhangM.,DuanW.,MaoN.,WuJ.,XuH.,DongF.,LinF.,JinC.,WangC.,ZhangJ., Xie L., Adv. Mater., 2014,26, No. 17, 2648–2653, doi:10.1002/adma.201306095

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201306095 2014

  13. [13]

    Noh J.-Y., Kim H., Park M., Kim Y.-S., Phys. Rev. B, 2015,92, No. 11, 115431, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.115431

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.115431 2015

  14. [14]

    Cheng Y., Zhu Z., Mi W., Guo Z., Schwingenschlögl U., Phys. Rev. B, 2013,87, No. 10, 100401, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.87.100401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.100401 2013

  15. [15]

    Yue Q., Chang S., Qin S., Li J., Phys. Lett. A, 2013,377, No. 19-20, 1362–1367, doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2013.03.034

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2013.03.034 2013

  16. [16]

    Electron Devices, 2018,65, No

    Tsai Y.-C., Li Y., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 2018,65, No. 2, 733–738, doi:10.1109/TED.2017.2782667

    work page doi:10.1109/ted.2017.2782667 2018

  17. [17]

    M., Mathew S., ACS Omega, 2023,8, No

    Balan B., Xavier M. M., Mathew S., ACS Omega, 2023,8, No. 29, 25649–25673, doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c02084

    work page doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c02084 2023

  18. [18]

    TongX.,AshalleyE.,LinF.,LiH.,WangZ.M.,NanoMicroLett.,2015,7,203–218,doi:10.1007/s40820-015- 0034-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s40820-015- 2015

  19. [19]

    Nanotechnol., 2013,8, No

    Lopez-Sanchez O., Lembke D., Kayci M., Radenovic A., Kis A., Nat. Nanotechnol., 2013,8, No. 7, 497–501, doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.100

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.100 2013

  20. [20]

    K., Friedman A

    Perkins F. K., Friedman A. L., Cobas E., Campbell P., Jernigan G., Jonker B. T., Nano Lett., 2013,13, No. 2, 668–673, doi:10.1021/nl3043079

    work page doi:10.1021/nl3043079 2013

  21. [22]

    Cheng, L

    Giannozzi P., Baroni S., Bonini N., Calandra M., Car R., Cavazzoni C., Ceresoli D., Chiarotti G. L., Cococcioni M., Dabo I., et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 2009,21, No. 39, 395502, doi:10.1088/0953- 8984/21/39/395502

    work page doi:10.1088/0953- 2009

  22. [23]

    Well-conditioned ptychographic imaging via lost subspace completion

    Giannozzi P., Andreussi O., Brumme T., Bunau O., Nardelli M. B., Calandra M., Car R., Cavazzoni C., Ceresoli D., Cococcioni M., et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 2017,29, No. 46, 465901, doi:10.1088/1361- 648X/aa8f79

    work page doi:10.1088/1361- 2017

  23. [24]

    Baerends E., Theor. Chem. Acc., 2001, 265–269, doi:10.1007/s002140050031

    work page doi:10.1007/s002140050031 2001

  24. [25]

    PerdewJ.P.,BurkeK.,ErnzerhofM.,Phys.Rev.Lett.,1996,77,No.18,3865,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 1996

  25. [26]

    P., Ruzsinszky A., Csonka G

    Perdew J. P., Ruzsinszky A., Csonka G. I., Vydrov O. A., Scuseria G. E., Constantin L. A., Zhou X., Burke K., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2008,100, No. 13, 136406, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.136406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.136406 2008

  26. [27]

    Catal., 2000,189, No

    Raybaud P., Hafner J., Kresse G., Kasztelan S., Toulhoat H., J. Catal., 2000,189, No. 1, 129–146, doi:10.1006/jcat.1999.2698

    work page doi:10.1006/jcat.1999.2698 2000

  27. [28]

    23702-10 First-principles study of the impact of As doping

    WangY.,TsengL.-T.,MurmuP.P.,BaoN.,KennedyJ.,IonescM.,DingJ.,SuzukiK.,LiS.,YiJ.,Mater.Des., 2017,121, 77–84, doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.037. 23702-10 First-principles study of the impact of As doping

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.037 2017

  28. [29]

    W., Nørskov J

    Bollinger M., Jacobsen K. W., Nørskov J. K., Phys. Rev. B, 2003,67, No. 8, 085410, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.67.085410

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.67.085410 2003

  29. [30]

    B., ACS Nano, 2011,5, No

    Johari P., Shenoy V. B., ACS Nano, 2011,5, No. 7, 5903–5908, doi:10.1021/nn201698t

    work page doi:10.1021/nn201698t 2011

  30. [31]

    V., Phys

    Komsa H.-P., Krasheninnikov A. V., Phys. Rev. B, 2015,91, No. 12, 125304

    2015

  31. [32]

    M., Yakobson B

    Zhou W., Zou X., Najmaei S., Liu Z., Shi Y., Kong J., Lou J., Ajayan P. M., Yakobson B. I., Idrobo J.-C., Nano Lett., 2013,13, No. 6, 2615–2622, doi:10.1021/nl4007479

    work page doi:10.1021/nl4007479 2013

  32. [33]

    D., Sanvito S., Phys

    Dolui K., Rungger I., Pemmaraju C. D., Sanvito S., Phys. Rev. B, 2013,88, 075420, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.88.075420

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.075420 2013

  33. [34]

    Appl., 2019,3, No

    Zhong M., Shen C., Huang L., Deng H.-X., Shen G., Zheng H., Wei Z., Li J., npj 2D Mater. Appl., 2019,3, No. 1, 1, doi:10.1038/s41699-018-0083-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41699-018-0083-1 2019

  34. [35]

    Lebegue S., Eriksson O., Phys. Rev. B, 2009,79, No. 11, 115409, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.79.115409

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.115409 2009

  35. [36]

    Setyawan W., Curtarolo S., Comput. Mater. Sci, 2010,49, No. 2, 299–312, doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.010 2010

  36. [37]

    Toriyama M., Ganose A., Dylla M., Anand S., Park J., Brod M., Munro J., Persson K., Jain A., Snyder G., Preprint arXiv:2103.03469, 2021

    arXiv 2021

  37. [38]

    Sci., 2016,651, 215–221, doi:10.1016/j.susc.2016.05.003

    Salehi S., Saffarzadeh A., Surf. Sci., 2016,651, 215–221, doi:10.1016/j.susc.2016.05.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.susc.2016.05.003 2016

  38. [39]

    C., Addou R., Wallace R

    Santosh K., Longo R. C., Addou R., Wallace R. M., Cho K., Nanotechnology, 2014,25, No. 37, 375703, doi:10.1088/0957-4484/25/37/375703

    work page doi:10.1088/0957-4484/25/37/375703 2014

  39. [40]

    G., Ullah S., Phys

    Menezes M. G., Ullah S., Phys. Rev. B, 2021,104, No. 12, 125438, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.125438

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.125438 2021

  40. [41]

    J., Chen Y., Ko C., Jang C., Sun Y., Sinclair R., Chang J., Tongay S., Wu J., Nano Lett., 2014,14, No

    Suh J., Park T.-E., Lin D.-Y., Fu D., Park J., Jung H. J., Chen Y., Ko C., Jang C., Sun Y., Sinclair R., Chang J., Tongay S., Wu J., Nano Lett., 2014,14, No. 12, 6976–6982, doi:10.1021/nl503251h

    work page doi:10.1021/nl503251h 2014

  41. [42]

    Xie W.-J., Li X., Zhang F.-J., Chem. Phys. Lett., 2020,746, 137276, doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2020.137276

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2020.137276 2020

  42. [43]

    BeshirB.T.,ObodoK.O.,AsresG.A.,RSCAdv.,2022,12,No.22,13749–13755,doi:10.1039/D2RA00775D

    work page doi:10.1039/d2ra00775d 2022

  43. [44]

    LiuQ.,YouJ.,XiongY.,LiuW.,SongM.,RenJ.,XueQ.,TianJ.,ZhangH.,WangX.,J.ColloidInterfaceSci., 2024,675, 772–782, doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2024.07.044

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2024.07.044 2024

  44. [45]

    Mano P., Jitwatanasirikul T., Roongcharoen T., Takahashi K., Namuangruk S., Appl. Surf. Sci., 2025,688, 162339, doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.162339. 23702-11 A. Daouadi, M. L. Benkhedir Дослiдження впливу легування арсеном на структурнi та електроннi властивостi моношару MoS2 з перших принципiв А. Даудi, М. Л. Бенхедiр Лабораторiя теоретичної та прикладної ф...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.162339 2025