pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09622 · v1 · pith:FSHZ4BAEnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Evolution of terahertz third harmonic response across rare-earth nickelate phase-diagram

Gulloo Lal Prajapati , Igor Ilyakov , Alexey Ponomaryov , Atiqa Arshad , Sanjeev Kumar , Jayaprakash Sahoo , Dhanvir Singh Rana , Abdelrahman Azab
show 3 more authors
Friedemann Queisser Ralf Sch\"utzhold Jan-Christoph Deinert
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 14:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords terahertz harmonic generationrare-earth nickelatesinsulator-metal transitionmagnetic transitionnegative charge-transfer insulatorsnonlinear responsecorrelated electrons
0
0 comments X

The pith

Terahertz third harmonic generation in rare-earth nickelates shows local maxima at insulator-metal transitions and minima at magnetic transitions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures how the amplitude of terahertz third harmonic generation varies with temperature in rare-earth nickelate films. It finds that when the phase transitions are sharp, the THG amplitude has a peak at the insulator-metal transition temperature and a dip at the magnetic transition temperature. This indicates that the nonlinear optical response is highly sensitive to the underlying electronic and magnetic states. The authors also present a theory for such harmonic generation in negative charge-transfer insulators and ways to increase the effect.

Core claim

In films with sharp phase-transitions, the local maximum and minimum in the temperature-dependent THG amplitude coincide with insulator-metal and magnetic transition temperatures, respectively. In films with weaker transitions, these features shift toward lower temperatures or even monotonous THG enhancement is observed down to low temperatures. A generalized theory for THz harmonic generation in negative charge-transfer insulators explains the observations.

What carries the argument

Temperature dependence of THz third harmonic generation amplitude, which is sensitive to the strengths of electronic and magnetic phases.

If this is right

  • THG serves as a probe for electronic and magnetic phase transitions in correlated materials.
  • The response can be tuned by controlling the sharpness of the phase transitions in the films.
  • A theory for negative charge-transfer insulators provides a framework for understanding and enhancing THz nonlinearities.
  • Applications of THz HHG expand to include strongly correlated materials like nickelates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar THG measurements could be used to study phase diagrams in other correlated oxide systems.
  • Optimizing film growth for sharper transitions might lead to stronger nonlinear THz responses for practical devices.
  • Connecting this to device applications could enable THz-based sensors that detect magnetic or electronic state changes.

Load-bearing premise

The peaks and dips in THG amplitude are directly due to the insulator-metal and magnetic transitions rather than coinciding temperature-dependent effects from scattering or lattice vibrations.

What would settle it

Perform THG measurements on nickelate films while simultaneously measuring resistivity to pinpoint the exact insulator-metal transition temperature and check for exact coincidence of the THG maximum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09622 by Abdelrahman Azab, Alexey Ponomaryov, Atiqa Arshad, Dhanvir Singh Rana, Friedemann Queisser, Gulloo Lal Prajapati, Igor Ilyakov, Jan-Christoph Deinert, Jayaprakash Sahoo, Ralf Sch\"utzhold, Sanjeev Kumar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Phase-diagram of bulk RNiO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Temperature-dependent resistivity of different RNiO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Temperature-dependent resistivity of NdNiO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Temperature-dependent resistivity of (a) NdNiO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Temperature-dependent THG/FH measured with THz field polarization along two orthog [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

High harmonic generation (HHG) is a sensitive probe for investigating electronic structures and dynamics of materials and a source for attosecond pulses. In particular, HHG with terahertz (THz) light can enable probing of nonlinear responses in correlated materials arising from low-energy many-body interactions. However, THz HHG studies have so far largely focused on topological materials and superconductors, leaving out other potential material systems which could also become efficient THz HHG sources. Here, we report THz third harmonic generation (THG) in rare-earth nickelates -- a prototype material for exploring the Mott insulator-metal transition and related technological applications. We find that the THG amplitude is highly sensitive to the strengths of electronic and magnetic phases of nickelates. In films with sharp phase-transitions, the local maximum and minimum in the temperature-dependent THG amplitude coincide with insulator-metal and magnetic transition temperatures, respectively. While in films with weaker transitions, these features shift toward lower temperatures or even monotonous THG enhancement is observed down to low temperatures. We developed a generalized theory for THz harmonic generation in negative charge-transfer insulators and outlined strategies to enhance the THz nonlinearities further. Our study broadens the scope of THz HHG studies and related applications to strongly correlated materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports terahertz third-harmonic generation (THG) measurements on rare-earth nickelate thin films spanning the Mott insulator-metal and magnetic phase diagram. In samples exhibiting sharp transitions, the temperature dependence of the THG amplitude displays a local maximum and minimum that coincide with the insulator-metal and magnetic ordering temperatures, respectively; these features shift or vanish in films with weaker transitions. The authors present a generalized theoretical framework for THz harmonic generation in negative charge-transfer insulators and outline routes to enhance the nonlinear response.

Significance. If the reported coincidence is shown to arise from the electronic and magnetic order parameters rather than other temperature-dependent mechanisms, and if the generalized theory supplies a quantitative, parameter-controlled prediction for the THG extrema, the work would extend THz HHG from topological and superconducting systems to a canonical family of correlated oxides. This would furnish an optical probe of the Mott transition and antiferromagnetic order and could guide materials engineering for nonlinear THz sources.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theory and Discussion sections] The central experimental claim (local max/min in THG amplitude coinciding with T_IM and T_N) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative comparison between the measured THG temperature dependence and the predictions of the generalized theory. Without such a comparison (e.g., calculated nonlinear susceptibility versus temperature across the two transitions), it remains unclear whether the observed features are produced by the order parameters or by other continuously varying quantities such as lattice constants or scattering rates.
  2. [Theory section] The generalized theory for negative charge-transfer insulators is introduced only at the level of a qualitative outline. No explicit expressions for the third-order susceptibility, the role of the charge-transfer energy, or the manner in which it changes across the insulator-metal and magnetic transitions are given, preventing assessment of whether the model is parameter-free or contains adjustable parameters that could be tuned to fit the data.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states that the THG amplitude is 'highly sensitive to the strengths of electronic and magnetic phases,' but does not specify the number of distinct rare-earth compositions or film thicknesses examined; adding this information would strengthen the claim of generality across the phase diagram.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. The comments highlight important points regarding the connection between experiment and theory. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen these aspects.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Theory and Discussion sections] The central experimental claim (local max/min in THG amplitude coinciding with T_IM and T_N) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative comparison between the measured THG temperature dependence and the predictions of the generalized theory. Without such a comparison (e.g., calculated nonlinear susceptibility versus temperature across the two transitions), it remains unclear whether the observed features are produced by the order parameters or by other continuously varying quantities such as lattice constants or scattering rates.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative comparison between the measured THG temperature dependence and the generalized theory would strengthen the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit calculations of the temperature-dependent third-order susceptibility derived from the theory, using the known evolution of the electronic and magnetic order parameters across T_IM and T_N. These calculations will be compared directly to the experimental data to demonstrate that the observed extrema arise from the order parameters rather than other temperature-dependent quantities. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Theory section] The generalized theory for negative charge-transfer insulators is introduced only at the level of a qualitative outline. No explicit expressions for the third-order susceptibility, the role of the charge-transfer energy, or the manner in which it changes across the insulator-metal and magnetic transitions are given, preventing assessment of whether the model is parameter-free or contains adjustable parameters that could be tuned to fit the data.

    Authors: The Theory section presents the framework at a generalized level applicable to the class of negative charge-transfer insulators. We will expand this section in the revision to include the explicit expression for the third-order nonlinear susceptibility, its dependence on the charge-transfer energy, and the manner in which both the susceptibility and the charge-transfer energy vary with the insulator-metal and magnetic order parameters. The model incorporates established material parameters from the literature on nickelates and is not adjusted to fit the THG data; the positions of the predicted extrema are fixed by the independently measured transition temperatures. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No derivation chain or equations present; circularity cannot be assessed

full rationale

The provided manuscript text consists solely of the abstract, which reports experimental observations of THG amplitude features coinciding with transition temperatures and mentions developing a generalized theory without any equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or citations. No load-bearing steps, self-definitions, or self-citation chains are visible, so no circularity is identifiable. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks only in the sense that nothing to analyze exists here.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The generalized theory for negative charge-transfer insulators is mentioned but its internal assumptions are not detailed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5810 in / 1182 out tokens · 15320 ms · 2026-06-27T14:51:58.323847+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Bloch, A

    J. Bloch, A. Cavalleri, V. Galitski, M. Hafezi, A. Rubio,Nature2022,606, 41-48

  2. [2]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, M. A. Sentef,Rev. Mod. Phys.2021,93, 041002

    2021

  3. [3]

    P. B. Corkum and F. Krausz,Nat. Phys.2007,3, 381

    2007

  4. [4]

    Krausz and M

    F. Krausz and M. Ivanov,Rev. Mod. Phys.2009,81, 163

    2009

  5. [5]

    B. Zaks, R. B. Liu, M. S. Sherwin,Nature2012,483, 580-583

  6. [6]

    Hohenleutner, F

    M. Hohenleutner, F. Langer, O. Schubert, M. Knorr, U. Huttner, S. W. Koch, M. Kira, R. Huber,Nature2015,523, 572-575

  7. [7]

    T. T. Luu, H. J. W¨ orner,Nat. Commun.2018,9, 916

    2018

  8. [8]

    M. R. Bionta, E. Haddad, A. Leblanc, V. Gruson, P. Lassonde, H. Ibrahim, J. Chaillou, N. ´Emond, M. R. Otto, ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, R. E. F. Silva, M. Ivanov, B. J. Siwick, M. Chaker, F. L´ egar´ e,Phys. Rev. Res.2021,3, 023250

    2021

  9. [9]

    Heide, Y

    C. Heide, Y. Kobayashi, D. R. Baykusheva, D. Jain, J. A. Sobota, M. Hashimoto, P. S. Kirchmann, S. Oh, T. F. Heinz, D. A. Reis, S. Ghimire,Nat. Photon.2022,16, 620-624

    2022

  10. [10]

    Zhong, Y

    S. Zhong, Y. Liang1, S. Wang1, H. Teng, X. He, Z. Wei,Mater. Futures2022,1, 032201

  11. [11]

    D. N. Basov, R. D. Averitt, D. van der Marel, M. Dressel, Kristjan Haule,Rev. Mod. Phys. 2011,83, 471-541

    2011

  12. [12]

    Ulbricht, E

    R. Ulbricht, E. Hendry, J. Shan, T. F. Heinz, M. Bonn,Rev. Mod. Phys.2011,83, 543-586

    2011

  13. [13]

    K. S. Kumar, G. L. Prajapati, R. Dagar, M. Vagadia, D. S. Rana, M.Tonouchi,Adv. Opt. Mater.2020,8, 1900958

    2020

  14. [14]

    C.-J. Yang, J. Li, M. Fiebig, S. Pal,Nat. Rev. Matter.2023,8, 518

    2023

  15. [15]

    H. A. Hafez, S. Kovalev, J.-C. Deinert, Z. Mics, B. Green, N. Awari, M. Chen, S. Germanskiy, U. Lehnert, J. Teichert, Z. Wang, K.-J. Tielrooij, Z. Liu, Z. Chen, A. Narita, K. M¨ ullen, M. Bonn, M. Gensch, D. Turchinovich,Nature2018,561, 507-511

  16. [16]

    Cheng, N

    B. Cheng, N. Kanda, T. N. Ikeda, T. Matsuda, P. Xia, T. Schumann, S. Stemmer, J. Itatani, 16 N. P. Armitage, R. Matsunaga,Phys. Rev. Lett.2020,124, 117402

    2020

  17. [17]

    Kovalev, H

    S. Kovalev, H. A. Hafez, K.-J. Tielrooij, J.-C. Deinert, I. Ilyakov,N. Awari, D. Alcaraz, K. Soundarapandian, D. Saleta, S. Germanskiy,M. Chen, M. Bawatna, B. Green, F. H. L. Kop- pens, M. Mittendorff, M. Bonn, M. Gensch, D. Turchinovich,Sci. Adv.2021,7, eabf9809

    2021

  18. [18]

    Kovalev, K.-J

    S. Kovalev, K.-J. Tielrooij, J.-C. Deinert, I. Ilyakov, N. Awari, M. Chen, A. Ponomaryov, M. Bawatna, T. V. A. G. de Oliveira, L. M. Eng, K. A. Kuznetsov, D. A. Safronenkov, G. Kh. Kitaeva, P. I. Kuznetsov, H. A. Hafez, D. Turchinovich, M. Gensch,npj Quantum Mater. 2021,6, 84

    2021

  19. [19]

    Deinert, D

    J.-C. Deinert, D. A. Iranzo, R. Perez, X. Jia, H. A. Hafez, I. Ilyakov, N. Awari, M. Chen, M. Bawatna, A. N. Ponomaryov, S. Germanskiy, M. Bonn, F. H. L. Koppens, D. Turchinovich, M. Gensch, S. Kovalev, K.-J. Tielrooij,ACS Nano2021,15, 1145-1154

  20. [20]

    Tielrooij, A

    K.-J. Tielrooij, A. Principi, D. S. Reig, A. Block, S. Varghese, S. Schreyeck, K. Brunner, G. Karczewski, I. Ilyakov, O. Ponomaryov, T. V. A. G. de Oliveira, M. Chen, J.-C. Deinert, C. G. Carbonell, S. O. Valenzuela, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Kiessling, G. V. Astakhov, S. Kovalev, Light Sci. Appl.2022,11, 315

    2022

  21. [21]

    Ilyakov, A

    I. Ilyakov, A. Ponomaryov, D. S. Reig, C. Murphy, J. D. Mehew, T. de Oliveira, G. L. Prajapati, A. Arshad, J.-C. Deinert, M. F. Craciun, S. Russo, S. Kovalev, K.-J. Tielrooij, Nano Lett.2023,23, 3872

    2023

  22. [22]

    Arshad, H

    A. Arshad, H. N. Koyun, R. Salikhov, M. Gensch, I. Ilyakov, A. Ponomaryov, G. L. Prajapati, T. V. A. G. de Oliveira, K. Mavridou, J. Lindner, J.-C. Deinert, C. G. ¨Unl¨ u, S. Kovalev,Adv. Photon. Res.2023,4, 2300088

    2023

  23. [23]

    K¨ urner,Terahertz Sci

    T. K¨ urner,Terahertz Sci. Technol.2012,5(1), 11–17

    2012

  24. [24]

    K¨ urner, S

    T. K¨ urner, S. Priebe,J. Infrared Milli. Terahz Waves2014,35, 53–62

  25. [25]

    Y. Yang, Y. Yamagami, X. Yu, P. Pitchappa, J. Webber, B. Zhang, M. Fujita, T. Nagatsuma, R. Singh,Nat. Photonics2020,14, 446–451

  26. [26]

    Banerjee, A

    R. Banerjee, A. Kumar, T. C. Tan, M. Gupta, R. Jia,P. Szriftgiser, G. Ducournau, Y. Chong, R. Singh,Sci. Adv.2025,11, eadu2526

    2025

  27. [27]

    G. L. Prajapati, S. Das, D. S. Rana,ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces2019,11, 36, 33109-33115

  28. [28]

    Makushko, S

    P. Makushko, S. Kovalev, Y. Zabila, I. Ilyakov, A. Ponomaryov, A. Arshad, G. L. Prajapati, T. V. A. G. de Oliveira, J.-C. Deinert, P. Chekhonin, I. Veremchuk, T. Kosub, Y. Skourski, F. Ganss, D. Makarov, C. Ortix,Nat. Electron.2024,7, 207-215. 17

    2024

  29. [29]

    T. A. U. Svetikova, I. Ilyakov, A. Ponomaryov, T. V. A. G. de Oliveira, C. Berger, L. F¨ urst, F. Bayer, J.-C. Deinert, G. L. Prajapati, A. Arshad, E. G. Novik, A. Pashkin, M. Helm, S. Winnerl, H. Buhmann, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Kiessling, S. Kovalev, G. V. Astakhov,Commun. Phys.2025,8, 361

    2025

  30. [30]

    Matsunaga, N

    R. Matsunaga, N. Tsuji, H. Fujita, A. Sugioka, K. Makise, Y. Uzawa, H. Terai, Z. Wang, H. Aoki, and R. Shimano,Science2014,345, 1145

  31. [31]

    Matsunaga, N

    R. Matsunaga, N. Tsuji, K. Makise, H. Terai, H. Aoki, R. Shimano,Phys. Rev. B2017,96, 020505(R)

  32. [32]

    Chu, M.-J

    H. Chu, M.-J. Kim, K. Katsumi, S. Kovalev, R. D. Dawson, L. Schwarz, N. Yoshikawa, G. Kim, D. Putzky, Z. Z. Li, H. Raffy, S. Germanskiy, J.-C. Deinert, N. Awari, I. Ilyakov, B. Green, M. Chen, M. Bawatna, G. Cristiani, G. Logvenov, Y. Gallais, A. V. Boris, B. Keimer, A. P. Schnyder, D. Manske, M. Gensch, Z. Wang, R. Shimano, S. Kaiser, Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1793

    2020

  33. [33]

    Shimano, N

    R. Shimano, N. Tsuji,Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.2020,11, 103-24

    2020

  34. [34]

    Isoyama, N

    K. Isoyama, N. Yoshikawa, K. Katsumi, J. Wong, N. Shikama, Y. Sakishita, F. Nabeshima, A. Maeda, R. Shimano,Commun. Phys.2021,4, 160

    2021

  35. [35]

    M.-J. Kim, S. Kovalev, M. Udina, R. Haenel, G. Kim, M. Puviani, G. Cristiani, I. Ilyakov, T. V. A. G. de Oliveira, A. Ponomaryov, J.-C. Deinert, G. Logvenov, B. Keimer, D. Manske, L. Benfatto, S. Kaiser,Sci. Adv.2024,10, eadi7598

    2024

  36. [36]

    Matsumoto, S

    H. Matsumoto, S. Neri, T. Kobayashi, A. Maeda, D. Manske, R. Shimano, arXiv:2507.14466

    arXiv

  37. [37]

    L. Feng, J. Cao, T. Priessnitz, Y. Dai, T. de Oliveira, J. Yuan, R. Oka, M.-J. Kim, M. Chen, A. N. Ponomaryov, I. Ilyakov, H. Zhang, Y. Lv, V. Mazzotti, G. Kim, G. Christiani, G. Logvenov, D. Wu, Y. Huang, J.-C. Deinert, S. Kovalev, S. Kaiser, T. Dong, N. Wang, H. Chu, Phys. Rev. B2023,108, L100504

  38. [38]

    H. Chu, S. Kovalev, Z. X. Wang, L. Schwarz, T. Dong, L. Feng, R. Haenel, M.-J. Kim, P. Shabestari, L. P. Hoang, K. Honasoge, R. D. Dawson, D. Putzky, G. Kim, M. Puviani, M. Chen, N. Awari, A. N. Ponomaryov, I. Ilyakov, M. Bluschke, F. Boschini, M. Zonno, S. Zhdanovich, M. Na, G. Christiani, G. Logvenov, D. J. Jones, A. Damascelli, M. Minola, B. Keimer, D....

    2023

  39. [39]

    L. Feng, H. Zhang, T. Priessnitz, J. Cao, T. Sarkar, T. de Oliveira, A. N. Ponomaryov, I. Ilyakov, F. Yang, Y. Lv, Y. Guo, K. Srowik, S. Danzenbacher, M. Niethammer, S. Kovalev, 18 J.-C. Deinert, S. Kaiser, R. L. Greene, H. Chu, arXiv:2504.11947

    arXiv

  40. [40]

    J. B. Torrance, P. Lacorre, A. I. Nazzal, E. J. Ansaldo, C. Niedermayer,Phys. Rev. B1992, 45, 8209

  41. [41]

    Middey, J

    S. Middey, J. Chakhalian, P. Mahadevan, J.W. Freeland, A.J. Millis, D.D. Sarma,Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.2016,46, 305-334

    2016

  42. [42]

    Catalano, M

    S. Catalano, M. Gibert, J. Fowlie, J. ´I˜ niguez, J.-M. Triscone, J. Kreisel,Rep. Prog. Phys. 2018,81, 046501

    2018

  43. [43]

    Scherwitzl, P

    R. Scherwitzl, P. Zubko, I. G. Lezama, S. Ono, A. F. Morpurgo , G. Catalan, J.-M. Triscone, Adv. Mater.2010,22, 5517-5520

    2010

  44. [44]

    Kinha, G

    M. Kinha, G. L. Prajapati, M. Udeshi, P. Agarwal, N. B. Ram, D. S. Rana,J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.2022,55, 225301

    2022

  45. [45]

    G. L. Prajapati, S. Kovalev, I. Ilyakov, A. Arshad, G. Dubey, K. S. Navale, D. S. Rana, J.-C. Deinert,Adv. Funct. Mater.2025,35, 2425867

    2025

  46. [46]

    K. W. Post, A. S. McLeod, M. Hepting, M. Bluschke, Y. Wang, G.Cristiani, G. Logvenov, A. Charnukha, G. X. Ni, P. Radhakrishnan, M.Minola, A. Pasupathy, A. V. Boris, E. Benckiser, K. A. Dahmen, E. W.Carlson, B. Keimer, D. N. Basov, Nat. Phys. 2018, 14, 1056

    2018

  47. [47]

    Q. Song, S. Doyle, G. A. Pan, I. E. Baggari, D. F. Segedin, D. C. Carrizales, J. Nordlander, C. Tzschaschel, J. R. Ehrets, Z. Hasan, H. El-Sherif, J. Krishna, C. Hanson, H. LaBollita, A. Bostwick, C. Jozwiak, E. Rotenberg, S.-Y. Xu, A. Lanzara, A. T. N’Diaye, C. A. Heikes, Y. Liu, H. Paik, C. M. Brooks, B. Pamuk, J. T. Heron, P. Shafer, W. D. Ratcliff, A....

    2023

  48. [48]

    G. L. Prajapati, S. Kundu, S. Das, T. Dev V V, D. S. Rana,New J. Phys.2022,24, 103016

    2022

  49. [49]

    G. L. Prajapati, S. Ray, I. Ilyakov, A. N. Ponomaryov, A. Arshad, T. V. A. G. de Oliveira, G. Dubey, D. S. Rana, J.-C. Deinert, P. Werner, S. Kovalev,Phys. Rev. B2026,113, 045118

  50. [50]

    Zaanen, G

    J. Zaanen, G. A. Sawatzky, J. W. Allen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985, 55, 418-421

    1985

  51. [51]

    Mizokawa, A

    T. Mizokawa, A. Fujimori, H. Namatame, K. Akeyama, N. Kosugi, Phys. Rev. B 1994, 49, 7193-7204

    1994

  52. [52]

    Bisogni, S

    V. Bisogni, S. Catalano, R. J. Green, M. Gibert, R. Scherwitzl, Y. Huang, V. N. Strocov, P. Zubko, S. Balandeh, J.-M. Triscone, G. Sawatzky, T. Schmitt, Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13017

    2016

  53. [53]

    G. L. Prajapati, S. Das, R. Dagar, V. E. Phanindra, D. S. Rana,Commun. Mater.2022,3, 49. 19

    2022

  54. [54]

    G. L. Prajapati, S. Das, D. S. Rana,J. Phys.: Condens. Matter2021,33, 415401

  55. [55]

    J. J. Peng, C. Song, M. Wang, F. Li, B. Cui, G. Y. Wang, P. Yu, F. Pan,Phys. Rev. B2016, 93, 235102

  56. [56]

    Aschauer, R

    U. Aschauer, R. Pfenninger, S. M. Selbach, T. Grande, N. A. Spaldin,Phys. Rev. B2013, 88, 054111

  57. [57]

    X. K. Lian, F. Chen, X. L. Tan, L. F. Wang, X. F. Xuan, G. Y. Gao, S. W. Jin, W. B. Wu, AIP Advances2013,3, 062133

  58. [58]

    Murakami, K

    Y. Murakami, K. Uchida, A. Koga, K. Tanaka, P. Werner,Phys. Rev. Lett.2022,129, 157401

    2022

  59. [59]

    Mikheev, A

    E. Mikheev, A. J. Hauser, B. Himmetoglu, N. E. Moreno, A. Janotti, C. G. Van de Walle, S. Stemmer,Sci. Adv.2015,1 (10), e1500797

    2015

  60. [60]

    Scherwitzl, S

    R. Scherwitzl, S. Gariglio, M. Gabay, P. Zubko, M. Gibert, and J.-M. Triscone,Phys. Rev. Lett.2011,106, 246403

    2011

  61. [61]

    M. Wu, E. Benckiser, M. W. Haverkort, A. Frano, Y. Lu, U. Nwankwo, S. Br¨uck, P. Audehm, E. Goering, S. Macke, V. Hinkov, P. Wochner, G. Christiani, S. Heinze, G. Logvenov, H.-U. Habermeier, B. Keimer,Phys. Rev. B2013,88, 125124

  62. [62]

    R. Rana, P. Pandey, V. E. Phanindra, S. S. Prabhu, D. S. Rana,Phys. Rev. B2018,97, 045123

  63. [63]

    S. Das, G. L. Prajapati, P. Anagha, D. S. Rana,Phys. Rev. B2018,98, 115110

  64. [64]

    Johnston, A

    S. Johnston, A. Mukherjee, I. Elfimov, M. Berciu, G. A. Sawatzky,Phys. Rev. Lett.2014, 112, 106404

    2014

  65. [65]

    A. Azab, F. Queisser, G. L. Prajapati, J.-C. Deinert, R. Sch¨ utzhold, arXiv:2603.05254

    arXiv

  66. [66]

    Torriss, A

    B. Torriss, A. Ibrahim, T. Ozaki, M. Chaker,Phys. Rev. B2018,98, 165132

  67. [67]

    Z. Wang, H. Park, Y. H. Lai, J. Xu, C. I. Blaga, F. Yang, P. Agostini, L. F. DiMauro,Nat. Commun.2017,8, 1686. 20

    2017