Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 45 references

Characteristic Mode Analysis of Plasmonic Nanostructures Using Hydrodynamic Volume Integral Equation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper tries to establish that the intrinsic resonances of plasmonic nanostructures can be found without exciting them, by solving a generalized eigenvalue problem built from a hydrodynamic volume integral equation.

desk verdict A competent but incremental extension of the authors' own conference work; the formulation is sound, but the numerical eigensolver's treatment of the nearly singular reactance matrix undermines the central resonance claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13435 v1 pith:FSR4XKCS submitted 2026-08-13 physics.comp-ph physics.optics

Meruyert Khamitova , Ran Zhao , Doolos Aibek Uulu , Sebastian Celis Sierra , Hakan Bagci This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.comp-phphysics.optics
keywords characteristicmodeanalysishydrodynamicmodelvolumeintegralequationplasmonicnanostructuresmodalsignificancenonlocalresponsenanoantennasgeneralizedeigenvalueproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the intrinsic resonances of a plasmonic nanostructure can be extracted without ever choosing an excitation, by carrying out characteristic mode analysis on a hydrodynamic volume integral equation. Existing solvers compute only the response to a particular source, so modes that a given source does not excite stay hidden. The authors reduce the coupled hydrodynamic and volume integral equations, valid for simple metals, to one equation for the induced hydrodynamic current, discretize it, and turn it into a generalized eigenvalue problem. The resulting modal significance curves reveal all extinction resonances of the structure, including the nonlocal longitudinal resonance above the plasma frequency that local Drude models cannot produce. If correct, the method gives nanoantenna designers a source-independent mode basis and explains why some resonances appear in extinction spectra while others stay dark under a chosen illumination.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the hydrodynamic volume integral equation (HDVIE), Eq. (7): the coupled hydrodynamic equation of the free-electron fluid and the volume integral equation for the scattered field are reduced, for simple metals, to a single equation in the induced hydrodynamic current density $\mathbf{J}_H$. Discretization uses full Schaubert–Wilton–Glisson (SWG) basis functions on tetrahedra with half-basis functions removed at the boundary; that removal enforces the hard-wall boundary condition $\hat{\mathbf{n}} \cdot \mathbf{J}_H = 0$, which makes the power-balance derivation and the matrix symmetry work. The characteristic mode machinery is the generalized eigenvalue equation $\bar{X} \bar{I}_k = \lambda_k \bar{R} \bar{I}_k$, where $\bar{R}$ and $\bar{X}$ are the real and imaginary parts of the discretized HDVIE impedance matrix, so the eigenvalue is the reactive-to-extinction power ratio of each mode and the modal significance $\sigma_k = 1/|1 + j\lambda_k|$ peaks at resonance. Mode tracking across frequency connects the eigenpairs into continuous MS curves.

What would settle it

Replace the hard-wall boundary condition by a soft or spill-out boundary condition in the same HDVIE discretization and recompute the MS curves for the 0.2 nm-gap dimer and the nanosphere; if the predicted gap resonance or the longitudinal resonance near $\omega = 1.13\,\omega_p$ shifts by more than the linewidth or disappears, the hard-wall CMA modes are not the structure's true intrinsic modes in that subnanometer regime.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that characteristic modes—currents and eigenvalues depending only on geometry and material—exist for hydrodynamic (nonlocal) metallic scatterers, and they can be computed from the hydrodynamic volume integral equation (HDVIE). The coupled hydrodynamic equation and volume integral equation are combined into one equation in the induced hydrodynamic current; after Galerkin discretization with full Schaubert–Wilton–Glisson basis functions, with half-basis functions removed to enforce the hard-wall boundary condition, the impedance matrix is split into real and imaginary parts, and the generalized eigenvalue equation $\bar{X} \bar{I}_k = \lambda_k \bar{R} \bar{I}_k$ is solved. The eigenvalue equals the ratio of reactive to extinction power of the mode, and modal significance $\sigma_k = 1/|1 + j\lambda_k|$ gives a bounded resonance curve. For a 1 nm-radius nanosphere, a nanorod, and a nanodimer with a 0.2 nm gap, the MS curves reproduce every extinction peak seen under plane-wave and dipole excitation and predict additional resonances—one at $\omega = 1.13\,\omega_p$ in the nanosphere above the plasma frequency, identified as a longitudinal resonance supported only by nonlocal response—that no local model can produce. The paper further shows that a resonance can be absent from extinction spectra simply because the source couples weakly to it, while a small number of strongly coupled resonant modes can reconstruct the radar cross section.

Load-bearing premise

The hard-wall boundary condition—that the hydrodynamic current's normal component vanishes at the metal surface, so electrons cannot spill out of the metal—must remain accurate for the structure being studied; the paper itself concedes that for a 0.2 nm gap, spill-out and tunneling may change the modes quantitatively.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The induced current on any such nanostructure can be expanded in characteristic modes independent of the source, so quantities like extinction and radar cross section can be reconstructed from a small number of dominant modes.
  • MS curves identify all intrinsic extinction resonances of the structure, including resonances that a plane wave or dipole does not excite, and explain dark resonances through weak modal excitation coefficients.
  • For simple metals, the framework includes nonlocal longitudinal modes above the plasma frequency that local Drude models omit, giving a fuller modal picture near the plasma frequency.
  • Because a resonance appears in the extinction spectrum only when a source couples strongly to it, the choice of excitation is an active design variable for targeting a specific mode in nanoantenna design.
  • The framework provides a source-free computational tool for analyzing and designing plasmonic nanoantennas whose dimensions require the nonlocal hydrodynamic model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the authors leave implicit: the same generalized eigenvalue construction with a different weighting matrix could define radiation or absorption characteristic modes for nonlocal scatterers, giving a more complete modal decomposition of lossy plasmonic antennas than extinction modes alone.
  • A testable extension would be to run the HDVIE-CMA on dimers with gaps between 0.2 nm and 1 nm and compare the predicted gap-mode resonance shift against quantum-corrected models; this would quantify where the hard-wall boundary condition starts to fail.
  • Because the paper shows that the longitudinal current above the plasma frequency needs far more modes to reconstruct than the transverse current, modal truncation error is mode-type- and frequency-dependent, so an error estimator for mode-count selection would be a natural follow-up.
  • The method could be used to identify structures that couple efficiently to the usually dark longitudinal resonance, turning a nonlocal response feature into a usable channel for emission or sensing.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives an excitation-independent modal analysis for nonlocal plasmonic nanostructures. Starting from the coupled hydrodynamic equation and volume integral equation, the authors reduce the system to a single Hydrodynamic Volume Integral Equation (HDVIE) for the induced hydrodynamic current, discretize it with full SWG basis functions (excluding half-SWG functions to enforce the hard-wall boundary condition), and cast the resulting matrix system into a characteristic-mode generalized eigenvalue problem. The modal significance (MS) curves are then used to identify intrinsic extinction resonances. The method is applied to a nanosphere, a nanorod, and a nanodimer, with the sphere case checked against Mie-series extinction spectra and the rod/dimer cases compared against extinction spectra computed from the same HDVIE solver under plane-wave and dipole excitations.

Significance. If the numerical results are trustworthy, this is a useful contribution: it provides a modal, excitation-independent framework for analyzing nonlocal plasmonic response, including longitudinal resonances absent in local Drude models. The derivation is internally consistent, the sphere validation against Mie theory is a genuine external check, and the modal reconstruction of the RCS and of the hydrodynamic currents demonstrates the intended use of the modes. The authors also state the hard-wall boundary-condition limitation and explicitly flag the subnanometer dimer regime as outside the model's quantitative validity. The main weakness is that the numerical eigensolver used for the central MS curves is not demonstrated to be reliable at the frequencies where the method claims to find resonances, and the non-sphere validations are not independent of the same discretized system being solved.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.5, Eqs. (33) and (34)] This issue is load-bearing because the MS curves and the reconstructed currents in Figs. 3, 4, 7, and 8 are the primary evidence for the method's central claim.
  2. [Section 3, all three examples] The absence of such a study leaves the numerical reliability claim unsupported, particularly for the nonlocal resonances that are the main novelty of the paper.
  3. [Sections 3.2 and 3.3, Figs. 9-13] The circularity is not total, since the modal expansion and RCS reconstruction are nontrivial, but the absence of any external reference for the non-sphere cases weakens the validation section.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figures 3, 10, and 13] The MS curves for the 10 tracked modes are plotted without a legend or explicit mode labeling, which makes it difficult to assess the mode-tracking quality and to identify which curve corresponds to the current distributions in Figures 4, 7, 8, 11, and 14. Please add labels or otherwise distinguish the modes.
  2. [Sections 3.1-3.3] The phrase 'coincide closely' is used repeatedly when comparing MS peaks with extinction peaks, but no quantitative frequency differences are given. Reporting the relative frequency error at each resonance would make the validation more precise.
  3. [Section 2.3, after Eq. (15)] The claim that R is positive definite is important for the reality of the eigenvalues and modes, but no justification or numerical check is provided. A brief explanation or a numerical verification of positive definiteness of R for the three examples would remove a potential concern.
  4. [Section 2.2, Eq. (9)] The statement that excluding half-SWG basis functions enforces the hard-wall boundary condition in Eq. (6) should be made more explicit: the reader must infer that all basis functions have zero normal component on boundary faces because the half functions attached to those faces are removed. This is correct, but it merits a sentence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the HDVIE-CMA eigenvalue problem and MS curves are independently defined from the impedance matrix, and the nanosphere validation uses external Mie-series results; nanorod/dimer comparisons are consistency checks, not fitted predictions.

full rationale

The paper's core derivation is self-contained: the hydrodynamic volume integral equation (Eq. 7) is obtained by substituting the scattered-field relation, continuity equation, and hydrodynamic equation, then discretized with full SWG basis functions and Galerkin testing to obtain the impedance matrix Z. The characteristic-mode generalized eigenvalue problem (Eq. 15, X I = lambda R I) is the standard CMA decomposition, with eigenvalues physically interpreted as the reactive-to-extinction power ratio (Eq. 32) and modal significance defined by Eq. 21. No parameter is fitted to the quantities later presented as predictions; the modes and MS curves are computed directly from the same Z that defines the solvers. The nanosphere validation is genuinely external: the extinction spectra are compared with analytical Mie-series solutions for both local and nonlocal models, and the nonlocal longitudinal resonance above the plasma frequency is corroborated by the Mie solution and the literature. The nanorod and nanodimer comparisons do rely on extinction spectra computed from the same discretized HDVIE (Eq. 10), so they are self-consistency checks rather than independent validations; however, they are not circular in the logical sense because the eigenvalue problem and the forced linear solve are distinct mathematical objects, and the paper explicitly demonstrates that high-MS modes can be weakly excited (e.g., the 0.75 omega_p case in Fig. 6), so the coincidence of extinction peaks and MS peaks is not vacuous. The self-citations, [14] and [33], are to the authors' prior work on the HDVIE and a preliminary version of this framework, but they are not load-bearing for the central claim: the hard-wall boundary condition is a physical modeling assumption with external support, and the derivation of the GEE is presented in the paper itself. The numerical concern that X becomes ill-conditioned near lambda = 0 and that the inverse iteration may be inaccurate is a correctness/robustness issue, not a circularity; accordingly, it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework introduces no fitted free parameters: the hydrodynamic material parameters (ω_p, γ, v_F) are standard physical inputs from prior literature, and the numerical tolerances are algorithm settings. The list of axioms covers the physical and mathematical premises the central claim rests on. No new physical entities are postulated; the HDVIE is a mathematical reformulation, and the characteristic modes are standard concepts.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Simple (alkali) metals have negligible bound-charge response, so the hydrodynamic current J_H represents the entire induced current.
    Invoked in Section 2.1 before Eq. (4) to justify reducing the coupled VIE+HDE to a single HDVIE; fails for noble metals with interband transitions.
  • domain assumption Hard-wall boundary condition: n·J_H = 0 on the metal surface, with no electron spill-out.
    Eq. (6); used to exclude half-SWG basis functions and to make the surface term Q in Eq. (26) vanish. The authors concede in Section 3.3 that this is inaccurate for subnanometer gaps.
  • domain assumption The extinction matrix R = Re(Z) is positive definite for the lossy hydrodynamic model.
    Used in Section 2.3-2.4 to ensure real eigenvalues and R-orthonormal modes; supported by the positive absorption term γ|J|^2 but not proven in the paper.
  • domain assumption The background medium is unbounded, homogeneous, nonmagnetic, with material parameters ε0, μ0.
    Stated at the start of Section 2.1; standard for VIE formulations.
  • standard math Standard Maxwell equations, volume equivalence principle, and dyadic Green's function for the background medium.
    Used throughout Section 2.1; accepted background theory.
  • standard math The discretized generalized eigenvalue problem with R symmetric positive definite yields a complete set of real eigenmodes that can represent any current.
    Linear algebra property of symmetric-definite pencils; used for the modal expansion in Eq. (17) and the orthogonality relation in Eq. (16).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Characteristic Mode Analysis of Plasmonic Nanostructures Using Hydrodynamic Volume Integral Equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FSR4XKCS

@misc{pith2026260813435,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Characteristic Mode Analysis of Plasmonic Nanostructures Using Hydrodynamic Volume Integral Equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FSR4XKCS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13435}
}
read the original abstract

Metallic nanostructures confine electromagnetic fields at subwavelength scales, making them attractive as plasmonic nanoantennas. At these scales, the response of metals becomes nonlocal, and the hydrodynamic model is widely used to capture this response. However, existing solvers provide only the response to a prescribed excitation and do not directly reveal the intrinsic resonances of the structure. This work extends the characteristic mode analysis to plasmonic nanostructures to enable excitation-independent modal analysis of their resonant behavior. For simple metals, the coupled hydrodynamic and volume integral equations are reduced to a single hydrodynamic volume integral equation in terms of the induced current. The equation is discretized and cast as a generalized eigenvalue problem within the characteristic mode analysis framework, whose solution yields the characteristic mode currents and modal significance curves of the structure. The proposed framework is validated through three metallic nanostructures: a nanosphere, a nanorod, and a nanodimer. The results show that the method identifies the intrinsic resonances of each structure, including resonances not excited by a given source and additional resonances arising from the nonlocal response, which are absent in local models. The proposed framework provides physical insight into the modal mechanisms of plasmonic nanostructures and serves as a practical tool for their analysis and design.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.13435 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Description of the electromagnetic scattering problem. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Normalized extinction spectra of the metallic nanosphere under (a) plane wave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. MS curves for the metallic nanosphere. x y z (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visualization of the dominant characteristic mode currents at (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Normalized modal excitation coefficients, where the marker size represents the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Normalized modal excitation coefficients, where the marker size represents the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Visualization of the hydrodynamic current reconstructed from the characteristic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Visualization of the hydrodynamic current reconstructed from the characteristic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Normalized extinction spectra of the metallic nanorod under (a) plane wave and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: MS curves for the metallic nanorod. y x z (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Visualization of the hydrodynamic current reconstructed from the characteristic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Normalized extinction spectra of the metallic nanodimer under (a) plane wave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: MS curves for the metallic nanodimer. x y z (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Visualization of the hydrodynamic current reconstructed from the characteristic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    Characteristic mode analysis of nanostructures using hydrodynamic volume integral equation

    Meruyert Khamitova, Ran Zhao, Doolos Aibek Uulu, and Hakan Bagci. Characteristic mode analysis of nanostructures using hydrodynamic volume integral equation. InProc. IEEE Int. Symp. Antennas Propag., pages 1343–1344, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Maier.Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications

    Stefan A. Maier.Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications. Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2007

    work page 2007

  3. [2]

    Schuller, Edward S

    Jon A. Schuller, Edward S. Barnard, Wenshan Cai, Young Chul Jun, Justin S. White, and Mark L. Brongersma. Plasmonics for extreme light concentration and manipulation. Nat. Mater., 9(3):193–204, 2010

    work page 2010

  4. [3]

    Stockman

    Mark I. Stockman. Nanoplasmonic sensing and detection.Science, 348(6232):287–288, 2015. 23

    work page 2015

  5. [4]

    H. A. Atwater and A. Polman. Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices.Nat. Mater., 9(3):205–213, 2010

    work page 2010

  6. [5]

    Tzarouchis, Elias Raninen, and Ari Sihvola

    Pasi Yl¨ a-Oijala, Dimitrios C. Tzarouchis, Elias Raninen, and Ari Sihvola. Characteristic mode analysis of plasmonic nanoantennas.IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 65(5):2165– 2172, 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [6]

    Antennas for light.Nat

    Lukas Novotny and Niek van Hulst. Antennas for light.Nat. Photonics, 5(2):83–90, 2011

    work page 2011

  8. [7]

    Simulation of three-dimensional nanoscale light interaction with spatially dispersive metals using a high order curvilinear DGTD method.J

    Nikolai Schmitt, Claire Scheid, Jonathan Viquerat, and St´ ephane Lanteri. Simulation of three-dimensional nanoscale light interaction with spatially dispersive metals using a high order curvilinear DGTD method.J. Comput. Phys., 373:210–229, 2018

    work page 2018

Show all 45 references
  1. [8]

    Asger Mortensen, Giuseppe Toscano, Søren Raza, Nicolas Stenger, Wei Yan, Antti- Pekka Jauho, Sanshui Xiao, and Martijn Wubs

    N. Asger Mortensen, Giuseppe Toscano, Søren Raza, Nicolas Stenger, Wei Yan, Antti- Pekka Jauho, Sanshui Xiao, and Martijn Wubs. Nanoplasmonics beyond Ohm’s law. In Proc. AIP Conf., volume 1475, pages 28–32, 2012

    2012

  2. [9]

    Asger Mortensen

    N. Asger Mortensen. Nonlocal formalism for nanoplasmonics: Phenomenological and semi-classical considerations.Photonics Nanostructures: Fundam. Appl., 11(4):303–309, 2013

    2013

  3. [10]

    Xuezhi Zheng, Mario Kupresak, Raj Mittra, and Guy A. E. Vandenbosch. A boundary integral equation scheme for simulating the nonlocal hydrodynamic response of metallic antennas at deep-nanometer scales.IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 66(9):4759–4771, 2018

    2018

  4. [11]

    Borisov, Peter Nordlander, and Javier Aizpurua

    Ruben Esteban, Andrei G. Borisov, Peter Nordlander, and Javier Aizpurua. Bridging quantum and classical plasmonics with a quantum-corrected model.Nat. Commun., 3(1):825, 2012. 24

    2012

  5. [12]

    T. V. Teperik, P. Nordlander, J. Aizpurua, and A. G. Borisov. Robust subnano- metric plasmon ruler by rescaling of the nonlocal optical response.Phys. Rev. Lett., 110(26):263901, 2013

    2013

  6. [13]

    Comparison of hydrodynamic models for the electromagnetic nonlocal response of nanoparticles.Adv

    Mario Kupresak, Xuezhi Zheng, Guy AE Vandenbosch, and Victor V Moshchalkov. Comparison of hydrodynamic models for the electromagnetic nonlocal response of nanoparticles.Adv. Theory Simul., 1(12):1800076, 2018

    2018

  7. [14]

    Uulu, Rui Chen, Lei Chen, Peng Li, and Hakan Bagci

    Doolos A. Uulu, Rui Chen, Lei Chen, Peng Li, and Hakan Bagci. Coupled solution of volume integral and hydrodynamic equations to analyze electromagnetic scattering from composite nanostructures.IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 71(4):3418–3429, 2023

    2023

  8. [15]

    Ming Fang, Zhixiang Huang, Wei E. I. Sha, and Xianliang Wu. Maxwell–hydrodynamic model for simulating nonlinear terahertz generation from plasmonic metasurfaces.IEEE J. Multiscale Multiphysics Comput. Tech., 2:194–201, 2017

    2017

  9. [16]

    Coupled electromagnetic and hydrodynamic semiconductor modeling for terahertz gen- eration.IEEE Trans

    Arif Can Gungor, Michael Doderer, Hande Ibili, Jasmin Smajic, and Juerg Leuthold. Coupled electromagnetic and hydrodynamic semiconductor modeling for terahertz gen- eration.IEEE Trans. Magn., 58(9):1–4, 2022

    2022

  10. [17]

    Teixeira, and John L

    Shubhendu Bhardwaj, Fernando L. Teixeira, and John L. Volakis. Fast modeling of terahertz plasma-wave devices using unconditionally stable FDTD methods.IEEE J. Multiscale Multiphysics Comput. Tech., 3:29–36, 2018

    2018

  11. [18]

    Hiremath, Lin Zschiedrich, and Frank Schmidt

    Kirankumar R. Hiremath, Lin Zschiedrich, and Frank Schmidt. Numerical solution of nonlocal hydrodynamic Drude model for arbitrary shaped nano-plasmonic structures using N´ ed´ elec finite elements.J. Comput. Phys., 231(17):5890–5896, 2012

    2012

  12. [19]

    Cirac ` ı, J

    C. Cirac ` ı, J. B. Pendry, and D. R. Smith. Hydrodynamic model for plasmonics: A macroscopic approach to a microscopic problem.ChemPhysChem, 14(6):1109–1116, 2013. 25

    2013

  13. [20]

    R.J. Garbacz. Modal expansions for resonance scattering phenomena.Proc. IEEE, 53(8):856–864, 1965

    1965

  14. [21]

    John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015

    Yikai Chen and Chao-Fu Wang.Characteristic Modes: Theory and Applications in Antenna Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015

    2015

  15. [22]

    Buon Kiong Lau, Miloslav ˇCapek, and Ahmed M. Hassan. Characteristic modes: Progress, overview, and emerging topics.IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., 64(2):14–22, 2022

    2022

  16. [23]

    R. F. Harrington and J. R. Mautz. Theory of characteristic modes for conducting bodies. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 19(5):622–628, 1971

    1971

  17. [24]

    Alternative surface integral equation-based characteristic mode analysis of dielectric resonator antennas.IET Microw

    Yikai Chen. Alternative surface integral equation-based characteristic mode analysis of dielectric resonator antennas.IET Microw. Antennas Propag., 10(2):193–201, 2016

    2016

  18. [25]

    Generalized surface-integral- equation-based sub-structure characteristic-mode solution to composite objects.IEEE Trans

    Shaode Huang, Chao-Fu Wang, and Ming-Chun Tang. Generalized surface-integral- equation-based sub-structure characteristic-mode solution to composite objects.IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 71(3):2626–2639, 2023

    2023

  19. [26]

    Integral equation formulations for characteristic modes of dielectric and magnetic bodies.IEEE Trans

    Fu-Gang Hu and Chao-Fu Wang. Integral equation formulations for characteristic modes of dielectric and magnetic bodies.IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 64(11):4770–4776, 2016

    2016

  20. [27]

    A spurious-free characteristic mode formulation based on surface integral equation for patch antenna structures.IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag

    Kun Fan, Ran Zhao, GuangShang Cheng, ZhiXiang Huang, and Jun Hu. A spurious-free characteristic mode formulation based on surface integral equation for patch antenna structures.IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., 21(4):685–689, 2022

    2022

  21. [28]

    Harrington, John R

    Roger F. Harrington, John R. Mautz, and Yu Chang. Characteristic modes for dielectric and magnetic bodies.IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 20(2):194–198, 1972. 26

    1972

  22. [29]

    Orthogonality properties of characteristic modes for lossy structures.IEEE Trans

    Mika Kuosmanen, Petteri Yl¨ a-Oijala, Jussi Holopainen, and Ville Viikari. Orthogonality properties of characteristic modes for lossy structures.IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 70(7):5597–5605, 2022

    2022

  23. [30]

    Computation of characteristic modes for dielectric bodies using volume integral equation and interpolation.IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag

    Qi Wu. Computation of characteristic modes for dielectric bodies using volume integral equation and interpolation.IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., 16:2963–2966, 2017

    2017

  24. [31]

    Gerhardts.Metal Optics Near the Plasma Frequency

    Frank Forstmann and Rolf R. Gerhardts.Metal Optics Near the Plasma Frequency. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1986

    1986

  25. [32]

    Schaubert, Donald R

    Dirk H. Schaubert, Donald R. Wilton, and Allan W. Glisson. A tetrahedral modeling method for electromagnetic scattering by arbitrarily shaped inhomogeneous dielectric bodies.IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 32(1):77–85, 1984

    1984

  26. [34]

    Jin.Theory and Computation of Electromagnetic Fields

    J.-M. Jin.Theory and Computation of Electromagnetic Fields. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015

    2015

  27. [35]

    Asger Mortensen

    Søren Raza, Giuseppe Toscano, Antti-Pekka Jauho, Martijn Wubs, and N. Asger Mortensen. Unusual resonances in nanoplasmonic structures due to nonlocal response. Phys. Rev. B, 84(12):121412, 2011

    2011

  28. [36]

    Bozhevolnyi, Martijn Wubs, and N

    S¨ oren Raza, Sergey I. Bozhevolnyi, Martijn Wubs, and N. Asger Mortensen. Nonlocal optical response in metallic nanostructures.J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 27(18):183204, 2015

    2015

  29. [37]

    Boardman and Rolf Ruppin

    Allan D. Boardman and Rolf Ruppin. The boundary conditions between spatially dis- persive media.Surf. Sci., 112(1):153–167, 1981. 27

    1981

  30. [38]

    Polimeridis, Maxwell T

    Athanasios G. Polimeridis, Maxwell T. H. Reid, Steven G. Johnson, John K. White, and Alejandro W. Rodriguez. On the computation of power in volume integral equation formulations.IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 63(2):611–620, 2015

    2015

  31. [39]

    Multilevel fast multipole algorithm enhanced characteristic mode solver for large-scale objects

    Guang Shang Cheng and Chao-Fu Wang. Multilevel fast multipole algorithm enhanced characteristic mode solver for large-scale objects. InProc. IEEE Int. Symp. Antennas Propag., pages 1525–1526, 2018

    2018

  32. [40]

    Lehoucq, Danny C

    Richard B. Lehoucq, Danny C. Sorensen, and Chao Yang.ARPACK Users’ Guide: Solution of Large-scale Eigenvalue Problems with Implicitly Restarted Arnoldi Methods. SIAM, 1998

    1998

  33. [41]

    Roland W. Freund. A transpose-free quasi-minimal residual algorithm for non-hermitian linear systems.SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 14(2):470–482, 1993

    1993

  34. [42]

    Balanis.Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design

    Constantine A. Balanis.Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016

    2016

  35. [43]

    Appropriate nonlocal hydrodynamic models for the characterization of deep-nanometer scale plasmonic scatterers.Adv

    Mario Kupresak, Xuezhi Zheng, Guy AE Vandenbosch, and Victor V Moshchalkov. Appropriate nonlocal hydrodynamic models for the characterization of deep-nanometer scale plasmonic scatterers.Adv. Theory Simul., 3(1):1900172, 2020

    2020

  36. [44]

    Asger Mortensen, and Martijn Wubs

    Wei Yan, N. Asger Mortensen, and Martijn Wubs. Green’s function surface-integral method for nonlocal response of plasmonic nanowires in arbitrary dielectric environ- ments.Phys. Rev. B, 88(15):155414, 2013

    2013

  37. [45]

    x7/PV1aFhyeLXsTODYvhj2pJocI=

    Nikolai Schmitt, Claire Scheid, St´ ephane Lanteri, Antoine Moreau, and Jonathan Vi- querat. A DGTD method for the numerical modeling of the interaction of light with nanometer scale metallic structures taking into account non-local dispersion effects.J. Comput. Phys., 316:396...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.