Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 62 references

The $q^{\mathrm{Volume}}$ lozenge tiling model via non-Hermitian orthogonal polynomials

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The qVolume lozenge tiling model attains Airy edge fluctuations, and at inflection points of the arctic curve the Airy line ensemble stays flat, with no parabola subtraction, for tangent shifts up to $o(N^{-2/9})$.

desk verdict Solid polynomial-asymptotics core with a new flat-edge Airy result that is honestly conditional on an unproved contour inequality. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.17042 v1 pith:FT3EE3FS submitted 2025-04-23 math-ph math.CVmath.MPmath.PR

Ahmad Barhoumi , Maurice Duits This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.CVmath.MPmath.PR MSC 60D0560F9933C4782B26
keywords lozengetilingsq-volumemodelAiryprocessextendedkernelnon-Hermitianorthogonalpolynomialslittleq-JacobiRiemann-Hilbertasymptoticsarcticcurve
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Random tilings of an $N\times N\times N$ hexagon weighted by $q^{\mathrm{Volume}}$ form a determinantal process, and this paper extracts its edge behavior as $q=e^{c/(2N)}$ and $N\to\infty$. It identifies the non-Hermitian orthogonal polynomials behind the correlation kernel as little $q$-Jacobi polynomials, computes their large-degree asymptotics, and uses them to show that the boundary of the liquid region has Airy-process correlations. Away from the hexagon boundary the rescaled correlation kernel converges to the extended Airy kernel. At inflection points of the arctic curve the curvature term in the spatial argument vanishes, so the usual parabola subtraction is unnecessary, and this flatness persists under tangent shifts of size $o(N^{-2/9})$. The derivation is conditional on a contour-sign lemma that is supported numerically and for small $c$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the monic non-Hermitian orthogonal polynomial family $P_n(z;q,N)$ defined by contour integrals against $\prod_{j=1}^{2N}(1+q^j/z)$. By a determinant evaluation these polynomials are little $q$-Jacobi polynomials with nonstandard parameters, and their large-degree asymptotics come from a nonlinear steepest descent analysis of a Riemann-Hilbert problem. The S-curve on which zeros accumulate is the explicit arc $\gamma_0$ of $|z|=e^{c/2}$, with endpoints $z_\pm$; the $g$-function, an auxiliary exponent function, and the phase $\Phi_c(z;\xi,\eta)$ organize the saddle point analysis of the correlation kernel. The mechanism producing the flat window is the vanishing, at an inflection point, of the coefficient in $r(\alpha,\beta)$ that is quadratic in the tangent shift $\beta$.

What would settle it

Evaluate the left side of inequality (6.38) numerically along $\gamma_{\mathrm{out}}\cap\mathbb{C}^+$ for $c>c_*$ and $\xi\in(-1,0)$, including at the inflection point. The lemma requires the expression to be negative for all $r\in(0,1)$; a high-precision quadrature finding any positive value would falsify Lemma 6.5 and the contour choice behind Theorems 2.7 and 2.10. A secondary check is the numerically located threshold $c_*\approx 3.32577$, where inflection points appear.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 2.10 (with Theorem 2.7): for $q=e^{c/(2N)}$, the rescaled correlation kernel at a boundary point of the liquid region converges, in the sense of finite-dimensional distributions, to the extended Airy kernel $A(\tau(\beta_1),r(\alpha_1);\tau(\beta_2),r(\alpha_2))$. At a generic boundary point the spatial parameter $r(\alpha,\beta)$ is quadratic in $\beta$, encoding the curvature of the arctic curve; at an inflection point the quadratic coefficient vanishes, so $r(\alpha)$ is independent of $\beta$. Consequently no parabola must be added to or subtracted from the Airy line ensemble at an inflection point, and the effect survives tangent shifts $\tilde\beta_j+\omega N^\delta$ for every $\delta<1/9$. The paper also establishes, as an independent result, that the zeros of $P_N(z;e^{c/(2N)},N)$ accumulate on an explicit arc $\gamma_0$ of the circle $|z|=e^{c/2}$, with endpoints $z_\pm$, and derives the corresponding asymptotics for the Christoffel-Darboux kernel. Theorem 2.10 is stated conditional on a contour lemma (Lemma 6.7) that the paper verifies numerically and for small $c$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument requires an unproved sign inequality about the real part of a phase function (inequality (6.38)): along the chosen contours, Re(Phi_c(z)-Phi_c(s)) must keep the right sign. The paper verifies it numerically for representative parameters, proves it for small c, and reduces all c>0 to this single inequality, but does not complete the proof; if the inequality fails, the exponentially small error estimates and Theorems 2.7 and 2.10 collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Generic boundary points of the qVolume liquid region are in the Airy universality class: the limiting two-point kernel is the extended Airy kernel, matching uniform and other tiling models.
  • At an inflection point the Airy line ensemble is flat in the tangent direction up to shifts $o(N^{-2/9})$; only the time parameter $\tau(\tilde\beta)$ feels the tangent shift.
  • The zero arc and Christoffel-Darboux asymptotics are standalone results for non-Hermitian little $q$-Jacobi polynomials, giving the equilibrium measure explicitly.
  • By the model's $2\pi/3$ rotational and reflection symmetries, the same Airy and flat-Airy limits hold on the other arcs of the frozen boundary.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same saddle expansion run at the degenerate value $c=c_*$, where two inflection points merge, should widen the flat window to $\delta<1/6$; this is not proved in the paper.
  • The phenomenon is driven by vanishing curvature rather than by the specific $q$-weight, so other one-parameter deformations of lozenge tilings whose arctic curves develop inflection points should show the same parabola-free Airy window.
  • A concrete testable prediction: at $c>c_*$, Monte-Carlo samples of tall hexagons near the inflection point should match the flat Airy kernel with $r(\alpha)$ independent of tangent displacement, rather than the curved $r(\alpha,\beta)$ valid away from inflection points.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the q^Volume lozenge tiling of the N x N x N hexagon, using the non-Hermitian orthogonal polynomial representation of the correlation kernel. The first part identifies the relevant orthogonal polynomials as little q-Jacobi polynomials with non-standard parameters (Proposition 2.1), proves Plancherel-Rotach type asymptotics as q = e^{c/(2N)} via a Riemann-Hilbert analysis (Theorem 2.4), and consequently shows that the zeros accumulate on an explicit circular arc. The second part uses these asymptotics in a saddle-point analysis of the correlation kernel: Theorem 2.7 claims convergence of the rescaled kernel to the extended Airy kernel at a generic boundary point of the liquid region, and Theorem 2.10 claims that at an inflection point of the arctic curve the Airy line ensemble is flat, without the usual parabolic shift, for tangent displacements of order N^delta with delta < 1/9. Both theorems are stated with the caveat that they depend on Lemma 6.7, whose key inequality (6.38) is only numerically supported.

Significance. If the results are fully established, they are a significant contribution to the asymptotic theory of q-deformed random tilings: they give the first Airy-process edge fluctuations and a genuinely new flat-edge scaling window for the q^Volume model, extending the machinery of Charlier-Duits-Kuijlaars-Lenells to a non-periodic q-deformed setting. The polynomial part is essentially complete and self-contained, with explicit formulas, no fitted parameters, and a clear RH derivation; the identification with little q-Jacobi polynomials and the explicit S-curve are valuable in themselves. However, the central asymptotic claims for the tiling boundary are conditional on an unproved contour inequality, so the significance of the paper in its current form is tempered by that gap.

major comments (3)
  1. [§6.5.2, Eq. (6.38); Lemma 6.7; §7] The proof of Theorems 2.7 and 2.10 relies on Lemma 6.7, whose proof is reduced to inequality (6.38). The manuscript states explicitly, after (6.38): "This, we do not prove, but provide numerical evidence for its validity for various choices of c, xi in Figure 18." Lemma 6.7 is the hinge for the exponentially small error estimates in Section 7: it supplies the contours gamma_z and gamma_w on which Re(Phi_c(z)-Phi_c(s)) has the required signs. If (6.38) fails for some admissible parameter range, the saddle-point estimates in Section 7, and with them the Airy kernel limits (2.31) and (2.36), are not established. The small-c case following from [15] does not cover all c > 0. This is a load-bearing gap in the central claim, not a presentation issue.
  2. [§6.4, Eqs. (6.31)-(6.32), Remark 2.6] The threshold c* entering Theorem 2.10 is not rigorously established. The text states that one can numerically verify that the first solution of (6.31) appears at s = e^{c/2}, then solves (6.32) numerically to obtain c* ≈ 3.32577, and Remark 2.6 asserts the existence and uniqueness of the inflection point on S without proof. Since Theorem 2.10 is stated for c > c*, its hypotheses are not verified within the proof. The authors acknowledge this in footnote 7, but a theorem whose parameter range is determined by an unproved numerical threshold should either be proved or explicitly stated as conditional on that numerical verification.
  3. [Abstract, Theorem 2.7, Remark 2.9] The abstract and the introductory statements present the Airy edge convergence of the boundary as an unconditional result, while Remark 2.9 states that Theorem 2.7 is "strictly speaking, conditional on Lemma 6.7 above." The conditional nature should be reflected in the main theorem statements and the abstract, or the missing proof of (6.38) must be supplied. As it stands, the central claims of the paper are weaker than the abstract suggests.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.3, after Eq. (2.22)] The sentence "It follows from (4.39) and the definitions of R(z), h(z) that dPhi_c/dz (z; xi, eta) = dPhi_c/dz (z; xi, eta)" appears to be a typo or an incomplete identity; the displayed equality is tautological. Please correct the intended formula.
  2. [Figure 18 caption] The caption says "The right hand side of (6.38)" while the plots show the left-hand side of (6.38), which is the quantity claimed to be negative. Please make the caption consistent with the text.
  3. [Throughout] The spelling "little q-Jaobi polynomials" in the introduction should be "little q-Jacobi polynomials".
  4. [Abstract and §1] The model is called q^Volume in the abstract and q-Volume elsewhere; please unify the notation.
  5. [§6.4, Remark 2.6] The claim that for c < c* the boundary is convex is not shown in the proof; the argument identifies the first appearance of an inflection point on S, and convexity of the full boundary for all c < c* is asserted rather than derived. If this is an easy consequence of (6.28) and symmetry, please spell it out.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Airy-edge theorems are derived from an explicit saddle-point analysis, and the unproved contour inequality is a proof gap, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The correlation kernel formula (1.10) is imported from Duits and Kuijlaars [28] as a published theorem; although one of the present authors is an author of [28], the cited theorem is independent external content and its statement does not include the Airy limits proved here, so this is not a case of self-citation carrying the conclusion. The equilibrium measure and g-function are constructed explicitly (Section 4), and the key S-curve inequality Re(g_+(z)+g_-(z)-V(z)+l) <= 0 on gamma\gamma0 is proved in Proposition 4.4 rather than assumed; the arc-of-a-circle zero accumulation is a consequence of the proved asymptotics, not an input. The Airy kernel in Theorem 2.7 emerges from the standard local cubic expansion around the saddle point with explicitly computed constants, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The threshold c* is the numerical root of the explicit equation (6.32), not a fit to the correlation kernel. The main caveat is Lemma 6.7, whose proof is reduced to the unproved inequality (6.38); the authors state 'This, we do not prove, but provide numerical evidence' (Section 6.5.2) and Remark 2.9 explicitly makes Theorem 2.7 conditional on Lemma 6.7. This is an acknowledged gap in the proof, not a circular reduction: the theorem does not assume its own conclusion, and the missing inequality is a technical contour-sign estimate rather than a restatement of the Airy limit. Therefore the paper exhibits no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to the target statements; c* is a root of an explicit equation, not a fit. The main unproved input is Lemma 6.7, with inequality (6.38), plus the numerical identification of c*. The external kernel formula from [28] is a prior theorem with partial author overlap, which counts as independent support rather than circularity.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Correlation kernel formula (1.10) of Duits and Kuijlaars [28, Theorem 4.7] is the starting point for the analysis.
    External prior theorem used as input. Partial author overlap exists, but the cited result is published and independent of the present conclusions.
  • standard math Standard Deift-Zhou nonlinear steepest descent applies to the approximate Riemann-Hilbert problems and the small-norm Riemann-Hilbert problem has a solution with the stated estimates.
    The paper provides the contour setup and estimates; this is standard machinery in the field and is used as background without a full re-derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper Lemma 6.7: contours gamma_z and gamma_w exist with Re(Phi_c(z) - Phi_c(s)) of the required signs, equivalent to inequality (6.38).
    This is load-bearing for Theorems 2.7 and 2.10. The paper gives numerical evidence in Figure 18, a small-c proof via [15], and states a reduction to the unproved inequality (6.38).
  • ad hoc to paper The threshold c* approximately 3.32577 is correctly identified as the first c at which inflection points appear, assuming the first solution of (6.31) occurs at s = e^{c/2}.
    The paper says this is verifiable numerically and provable in principle, but the rigorous verification is omitted. It is needed for the c greater than c* inflection-point theorem.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The $q^{\mathrm{Volume}}$ lozenge tiling model via non-Hermitian orthogonal polynomials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FT3EE3FS

@misc{pith2026250417042,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The $q^\mathrmVolume$ lozenge tiling model via non-Hermitian orthogonal polynomials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FT3EE3FS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.17042}
}
abstract

We consider the $q^\text{Volume}$ lozenge tiling model on a large, finite hexagon. It is well-known that random lozenge tilings of the hexagon correspond to a two-dimensional determinantal point process via a bijection with ensembles of non-intersecting paths. The starting point of our analysis is a formula for the correlation kernel due to Duits and Kuijlaars which involves the Christoffel-Darboux kernel of a particular family of non-Hermitian orthogonal polynomials. Our main results are split into two parts: the first part concerns the family of orthogonal polynomials, and the second concerns the behavior of the boundary of the so-called arctic curve. In the first half, we identify the orthogonal polynomials as a non-standard instance of little $q$-Jacobi polynomials and compute their large degree asymptotics in the $q \to 1$ regime. A consequence of this analysis is a proof that the zeros of the orthogonal polynomials accumulate on an arc of a circle and an asymptotic formula for the Christoffel-Darboux kernel. In the second half, we use these asymptotics to show that the boundary of the liquid region converges to the Airy process, in the sense of finite dimensional distributions, away from the boundary of the hexagon. At inflection points of the arctic curve, we show that we do not need to subtract/add a parabola to the Airy line ensemble, and this effect persists at distances which are $o(N^{-2/9})$ in the tangent direction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [15]

    Charlier, M

    C. Charlier, M. Duits, A. B. J. Kuijlaars, and J. Lenells, A periodic hexagon tiling model and non-Hermitian orthogonal polynomials, Comm. Math. Phys. 378 (2020), no. 1, 401–466. MR4124992

    work page 2020

  2. [28]

    Duits and A

    M. Duits and A. B. J. Kuijlaars, The two-periodic Aztec diamond and matrix valued orthogonal polynomials , J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 23 (2021), no. 4, 1075–1131. MR4228276

    work page 2021

  3. [1]

    Adler, K

    M. Adler, K. Johansson, and P . van Moerbeke, Tilings of non-convex polygons, skew-Young tableaux and determinantal processes , Comm. Math. Phys. 364 (2018), no. 1, 287–342. MR3861299

    work page 2018

  4. [2]

    Aggarwal, Universality for lozenge tiling local statistics, Ann

    A. Aggarwal, Universality for lozenge tiling local statistics, Ann. of Math. (2) 198 (2023), no. 3, 881–1012. MR4660134

    work page 2023

  5. [3]

    Aggarwal and J

    A. Aggarwal and J. Huang, Edge statistics for lozenge tilings of polygons, ii: Airy line ensemble, Forum of Mathematics, Pi (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [4]

    J. Baik, T. Kriecherbauer, K. T.-R. McLaughlin, and P . D. Miller, Discrete orthogonal polynomials , Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 164, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2007. Asymptotics and applications. MR2283089

    work page 2007

  7. [5]

    Beffara, S

    V . Beffara, S. Chhita, and K. Johansson,Airy point process at the liquid-gas boundary, Ann. Probab. 46 (2018), no. 5, 2973–3013. MR3846843

    work page 2018

  8. [6]

    Berggren, Domino tilings of the Aztec diamond with doubly periodic weightings, Ann

    T. Berggren, Domino tilings of the Aztec diamond with doubly periodic weightings, Ann. Probab. 49 (2021), no. 4, 1965–2011. MR4260472

    work page 2021

Show all 62 references
  1. [7]

    Berggren and A

    T. Berggren and A. Borodin, Geometry of the doubly periodic Aztec dimer model, 2023. Arxiv: 2306.07482

    2023 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Arxiv: 2410.04187

    , Crystallization of the Aztec diamond, 2024. Arxiv: 2410.04187

    2024 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Betea, Elliptically distributed lozenge tilings of a hexagon , SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom

    D. Betea, Elliptically distributed lozenge tilings of a hexagon , SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. 14 (2018), Paper No. 032,

    2018

  4. [10]

    Borodin and V

    A. Borodin and V . Gorin,Lectures on integrable probability, Probability and statistical physics in St. Petersburg, 2016, pp. 155–214. MR3526828

    2016

  5. [11]

    Borodin, V

    A. Borodin, V . Gorin, and E. M. Rains, q-distributions on boxed plane partitions , Selecta Mathematica 16 (December 2010), no. 4, 731–789. MR2734330

    2010

  6. [12]

    Breuer and M

    J. Breuer and M. Duits, Central limit theorems for biorthogonal ensembles and asymptotics of recurrence coefficients , Journal of the American Mathematical Society 30 (January 2017), no. 1, 27–66 (en)

    2017

  7. [13]

    Bufetov and V

    A. Bufetov and V . Gorin,Fluctuations of particle systems determined by Schur generating functions, Adv. Math. 338 (2018), 702–781. MR3861715

    2018

  8. [14]

    Carlitz, Some determinants of q-binomial coefficients, J

    L. Carlitz, Some determinants of q-binomial coefficients, J. Reine Angew. Math. 226 (1967), 216–220. MR227188

    1967

  9. [16]

    Charlier, Doubly periodic lozenge tilings of a hexagon and matrix valued orthogonal polynomials , Stud

    C. Charlier, Doubly periodic lozenge tilings of a hexagon and matrix valued orthogonal polynomials , Stud. Appl. Math. 146 (2021), no. 1, 3–80. MR4206375

    2021

  10. [17]

    Chhita and K

    S. Chhita and K. Johansson, Domino statistics of the two-periodic Aztec diamond, Adv. Math. 294 (2016), 37–149. MR3479561

    2016

  11. [18]

    H. Cohn, N. Elkies, and J. Propp, Local statistics for random domino tilings of the Aztec diamond , Duke Math. J. 85 (1996), no. 1, 117–166. MR1412441

    1996

  12. [19]

    H. Cohn, R. Kenyon, and J. Propp, A variational principle for domino tilings, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (2001), no. 2, 297–346. MR1815214

    2001

  13. [20]

    H. Cohn, M. Larsen, and J. Propp, The shape of a typical boxed plane partition, New York J. Math. 4 (1998), 137–165. MR1641839

    1998

  14. [21]

    R. S. Costas-Santos and J. F. S ´anchez-Lara, Orthogonality of q-polynomials for non-standard parameters , J. Approx. Theory 163 (2011), no. 9, 1246–1268. MR2832754

    2011

  15. [22]

    Deift and X

    P . Deift and X. Zhou, A steepest descent method for oscillatory Riemann-Hilbert problems. Asymptotics for the MKdV equation , Ann. of Math. (2) 137 (1993), no. 2, 295–368. MR1207209

    1993

  16. [23]

    P . A. Deift, Orthogonal polynomials and random matrices: a Riemann-Hilbert approach, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 3, New York University, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York; American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999. MR1677884

    1999

  17. [24]

    Dimitrov and A

    E. Dimitrov and A. Knizel, Log-gases on quadratic lattices via discrete loop equations and q-boxed plane partitions, J. Funct. Anal. 276 (2019), no. 10, 3067–3169. MR3944289

    2019

  18. [25]

    NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions . F. W. J. Olver, A. B. Olde Daalhuis, D. W. Lozier, B. I. Schneider, R. F. Boisvert, C. W. Clark, B. R. Miller, B. V . Saunders, H. S. Cohl, and M. A. McClain, eds. 50 A. BARHOUMI AND M. DUITS

  19. [26]

    Duits, On global fluctuations for non-colliding processes, Ann

    M. Duits, On global fluctuations for non-colliding processes, Ann. Probab. 46 (2018), no. 3, 1279–1350. MR3785589

    2018

  20. [27]

    Duits, E

    M. Duits, E. Duse, and W. Liu, Lozenge tilings of a hexagon and q-Racah ensembles, J. Phys. A57 (2024), no. 40, Paper No. 405202, 70. MR4808695

    2024

  21. [29]

    Duse and A

    E. Duse and A. Metcalfe, Asymptotic geometry of discrete interlaced patterns: Part I, Internat. J. Math. 26 (2015), no. 11, 1550093, 66. MR3413988

    2015

  22. [30]

    , Asymptotic geometry of discrete interlaced patterns: Part II, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 70 (2020), no. 1, 375–436. MR4105942

    2020

  23. [31]

    Eynard and M

    B. Eynard and M. L. Mehta, Matrices coupled in a chain. I. Eigenvalue correlations, J. Phys. A 31 (1998), no. 19, 4449–4456. MR1628667

    1998

  24. [32]

    A. S. Fokas, A. R. Its, and A. V . Kitaev, The isomonodromy approach to matrix models in 2d quantum gravity, Communications in Mathematical Physics 147 (1992), no. 2, 395–430. MR1174420

    1992

  25. [33]

    F. D. Gakhov, Boundary value problems, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1990. Translated from the Russian, Reprint of the 1966 translation. MR1106850

    1990

  26. [34]

    A. A. Gonchar and E. A. Rakhmanov, Equilibrium distributions and the rate of rational approximation of analytic functions, Mat. Sb. (N.S.)134(176) (1987), no. 3, 306–352, 447. MR922628

    1987

  27. [35]

    V . E. Gorin, Nonintersecting paths and the Hahn orthogonal polynomial ensemble , Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. 42 (2008), no. 3, 23–44, 96. MR2454474

    2008

  28. [36]

    Gorin,Lectures on random lozenge tilings, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol

    V . Gorin,Lectures on random lozenge tilings, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 193, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,

  29. [37]

    Gorin and J

    V . Gorin and J. Huang,Dynamical loop equation, Ann. Probab. 52 (2024), no. 5, 1758–1863. MR4791420

    2024

  30. [38]

    Jockusch, J

    W. Jockusch, J. Propp, and P . Shor,Random domino tilings and the arctic circle theorem, 1998. Arxiv:9801068

    1998

  31. [39]

    Johansson, Non-intersecting paths, random tilings and random matrices, Probab

    K. Johansson, Non-intersecting paths, random tilings and random matrices, Probab. Theory Related Fields123 (2002), no. 2, 225–280. MR1900323

    2002

  32. [40]

    , Discrete polynuclear growth and determinantal processes, Comm. Math. Phys. 242 (2003), no. 1-2, 277–329. MR2018275

    2003

  33. [41]

    , The arctic circle boundary and the Airy process, Ann. Probab. 33 (2005), no. 1, 1–30. MR2118857

    2005

  34. [42]

    , Random matrices and determinantal processes, Mathematical statistical physics, 2006, pp. 1–55. MR2581882

    2006

  35. [43]

    Johansson and E

    K. Johansson and E. Nordenstam, Eigenvalues of GUE minors, Electron. J. Probab. 11 (2006), no. 50, 1342–1371. MR2268547

    2006

  36. [44]

    Eigenvalues of GUE minors

    , Erratum to: “Eigenvalues of GUE minors” [Electron. J. Probab. 11 (2006), no. 50, 1342–1371; mr2268547] , Electron. J. Probab. 12 (2007), 1048–1051. MR2336598

    2006

  37. [45]

    Kenyon, Lectures on dimers, Statistical mechanics, 2009, pp

    R. Kenyon, Lectures on dimers, Statistical mechanics, 2009, pp. 191–230. MR2523460

    2009

  38. [46]

    Kenyon and A

    R. Kenyon and A. Okounkov, Limit shapes and the complex Burgers equation, Acta Math. 199 (2007), no. 2, 263–302. MR2358053

    2007

  39. [47]

    Kenyon, A

    R. Kenyon, A. Okounkov, and S. Sheffield, Dimers and amoebae, Ann. of Math. (2) 163 (2006), no. 3, 1019–1056. MR2215138

    2006

  40. [48]

    Koekoek, P

    R. Koekoek, P . A. Lesky, and R. F. Swarttouw, Hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials and their q-analogues , Springer Monographs in Mathe- matics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010. With a foreword by Tom H. Koornwinder. MR2656096

    2010

  41. [49]

    Kuchumov, Limit shapes for the dimer model, 2017

    N. Kuchumov, Limit shapes for the dimer model, 2017

    2017

  42. [50]

    A. B. J. Kuijlaars and G. L. F. Silva, S-curves in polynomial external fields, J. Approx. Theory 191 (2015), 1–37. MR3306308

    2015

  43. [51]

    Mart ´ınez-Finkelshtein and E

    A. Mart ´ınez-Finkelshtein and E. A. Rakhmanov, Critical measures, quadratic differentials, and weak limits of zeros of Stieltjes polynomials, Comm. Math. Phys. 302 (2011), no. 1, 53–111. MR2770010

    2011

  44. [52]

    R. J. McIntosh, Some asymptotic formulae for q-shifted factorials, Ramanujan J. 3 (1999), no. 2, 205–214. MR1703273

    1999

  45. [53]

    Mkrtchyan and L

    S. Mkrtchyan and L. Petrov, GUE corners limit of q-distributed lozenge tilings, Electron. J. Probab. 22 (2017), Paper No. 101, 24. MR3733659

    2017

  46. [54]

    Navot, A further extension of the euler-maclaurin summation formula, Journal of Mathematics and Physics41 (1962), no

    I. Navot, A further extension of the euler-maclaurin summation formula, Journal of Mathematics and Physics41 (1962), no. 1-4, 155–163, available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/sapm1962411155

    1962 doi

  47. [55]

    Okounkov and N

    A. Okounkov and N. Reshetikhin, The birth of a random matrix, Mosc. Math. J. 6 (2006), no. 3, 553–566, 588. MR2274865

    2006

  48. [56]

    G. I. Ol ′ shanski˘i, Difference operators and determinantal point processes, Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. 42 (2008), no. 4, 83–97, 112. MR2492429

    2008

  49. [57]

    F. W. J. Olver, Asymptotics and special functions, Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Academic Press [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York-London, 1974. MR435697

    1974

  50. [58]

    Petrov, Asymptotics of random lozenge tilings via Gelfand-Tsetlin schemes , Probab

    L. Petrov, Asymptotics of random lozenge tilings via Gelfand-Tsetlin schemes , Probab. Theory Related Fields 160 (2014), no. 3-4, 429–487. MR3278913

    2014

  51. [59]

    Gaussian free field, Ann

    , Asymptotics of uniformly random lozenge tilings of polygons. Gaussian free field, Ann. Probab. 43 (2015), no. 1, 1–43. MR3298467

    2015

  52. [60]

    E. A. Rakhmanov, Orthogonal polynomials and S-curves, Recent advances in orthogonal polynomials, special functions, and their applications, 2012, pp. 195–239. MR2964146

    2012

  53. [61]

    Stahl, Orthogonal polynomials with complex-valued weight function

    H. Stahl, Orthogonal polynomials with complex-valued weight function. I, II, Constr. Approx. 2 (1986), no. 3, 225–240, 241–251. MR891973

    1986

  54. [62]

    W. P . Thurston,Conway’s tiling groups, Amer. Math. Monthly 97 (1990), no. 8, 757–773. MR1072815 (A.B.) DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS , ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (KTH), S TOCKHOLM , SWEDEN . E MAIL : ahmadba@kth.se (M.D.) DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS , ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLO...

    1990

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.