Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 59 references

More on unconstrained descriptions of Higher Spin Massless Particles

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A local action with two symmetric fields describes free massless particles of any integer spin, replacing the Fronsdal constraints with a Weyl symmetry.

desk verdict A sound two-field unconstrained action for free massless higher spins, slightly overclaimed in the s=4 'unique' phrasing and with a couple of terse integrations; worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01596 v1 pith:FTB44USV submitted 2025-01-03 hep-th

R. Schimidt Bittencourt , D. Dalmazi , E.L. Mendonça This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords higher-spingaugefieldsFronsdalactionunconstrainedhigherspinsStueckelbergfieldWeylsymmetrynonlocalactionsspinprojectionoperatorstensionlessstringlimit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a local action, $S_\alpha[\phi,\alpha]$, that describes free massless particles of any integer spin $s$ in flat space using only two unconstrained symmetric tensor fields: $\phi$ of rank $s$ and a Stueckelberg field $\alpha$ of rank $s-3$. The action is an unconstrained version of the Fronsdal theory: the double-traceless condition on $\phi$ is replaced by a rank-$(s-4)$ Weyl-like gauge symmetry, and the traceless constrained diffeomorphism of Fronsdal is enlarged to full diffeomorphism through $\alpha$. After a partial gauge fixing that preserves diffeomorphism invariance, the equations of motion become $F(\phi)-3\,\partial\partial\partial\,\alpha=0$, the equation previously obtained by truncating the tensionless open bosonic string spectrum. If the construction is correct, the Fronsdal constraints are not fundamental but artifacts of a particular gauge choice, and higher-spin gauge theory can be written with the same field content as the string-inspired description.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the field redefinition chain $\tilde\phi(\phi,\alpha)=\phi-\partial f(\alpha)$, where $f(\alpha)$ is built from the trace decomposition of the gauge parameter so that $\delta_\Lambda\tilde\phi=\partial\bar\Lambda$ (a pure traceless diffeomorphism) when $\delta_\Lambda\alpha=\Lambda'$, and then $\varphi(\tilde\phi)=\tilde\phi+\sum_{n\ge2}(n-1)c_{n-1}\eta^n\tilde\phi^{[n]}$ with coefficients chosen so that $\varphi''\equiv0$ identically. The first step converts constrained diffeomorphisms into full diffeomorphisms with the Stueckelberg field $\alpha$; the second step lifts the double-traceless constraint, replacing it with a rank-$(s-4)$ Weyl invariance. The other essential input is the pure-gauge theorem cited in the paper as reference [40], which licenses setting $\alpha=0$ at the level of the action and thereby identifies $S_\alpha$ with the Fronsdal theory in that gauge. For the spin-4 analysis, a complete orthonormal basis of projection and transition operators on rank-4 symmetric tensors (Appendix A) carries the computation of the propagator and the unitarity conditions for the two-parameter family.

What would settle it

Compute the full two-point function of $S_\alpha$ for $s=4$ without integrating out $\alpha$, or perform a Hamiltonian constraint analysis; the action contains an $\alpha\,\Box^2\,\alpha$ term, so a pole at nonzero $k^2$ in the propagator, or an extra mode in the constraint algebra after fixing $\alpha=0$, would mean the Ostrogradsky ghost is physical and the claim of pure massless spin-4 content fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the local action $S_\alpha[\phi,\alpha]$ in equation (41) — obtained from the Fronsdal action by the field redefinitions $\tilde\phi=\phi-\partial f(\alpha)$ and $\varphi(\tilde\phi)$ — describes the free dynamics of a massless particle of any integer spin $s$ with no off-shell constraints. $\phi$ is a rank-$s$ symmetric tensor and $\alpha$ is a rank-$(s-3)$ symmetric tensor; the action is invariant under unconstrained diffeomorphisms and a rank-$(s-4)$ Weyl transformation. In the gauge $\phi''-4\,\partial\cdot\alpha-\partial\alpha'=0$, the equations of motion reduce to $F(\phi)-3\,\partial\partial\partial\,\alpha=0$, the diffeomorphism-invariant equation first obtained from the tensionless limit of open bosonic string field theory. For $s=4$ the paper proves by explicit functional integration that eliminating $\alpha$ produces a unique nonlocal action invariant under both Weyl and diffeomorphism symmetries and carrying only the spin-4 massless pole, and that eliminating $\alpha$ after fixing the Weyl symmetry reproduces the previously known nonlocal diffeomorphism-invariant spin-4 action. The same section analyzes the whole two-parameter family of nonlocal rank-4 actions and identifies those two as the unique ones whose massless spectrum is pure spin-4.

Load-bearing premise

The construction depends on the theorem, cited in the paper as reference [40], that a field transforming by a shift under the trace of the gauge parameter can be gauge-fixed to zero at the level of the action without losing physical content, even when the action contains higher derivatives; if that theorem does not apply to $S_\alpha$, eliminating $\alpha$ is unjustified and the reduction to Fronsdal fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every integer spin $s$, a local unconstrained two-field action now exists whose field equations reduce to the string-inspired equation (44), so the Fronsdal constraints can be viewed as gauge artifacts.
  • For $s=4$, the functional integration over $\alpha$ is performed explicitly: the resulting nonlocal action (47) is the unique WSDiff-invariant action with a pure spin-4 massless pole, and the gauge-fixed elimination yields the unique Diff-invariant action (49) from the literature.
  • The analysis of the two-parameter family $S(a,b)$ shows that any other choice of coefficients in the nonlocal Diff-invariant action either propagates additional spin-2 or spin-0 modes or introduces ghosts, so the actions obtained from $S_\alpha$ are singled out within their symmetry classes.
  • The new rank-4 projection and transition operator basis is a reusable tool for unitarity checks of other nonlocal rank-4 gauge theories.
  • If the pure-gauge theorem holds, the higher-derivative $\alpha\,\Box^2\,\alpha$ term is harmless: it does not signal an Ostrogradsky ghost because $\alpha$ is pure gauge.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same two-field reduction should work for fermionic higher spins and for AdS backgrounds, where the Fronsdal tensor has a known deformed version; if the pure-gauge theorem survives those settings, the field-content reduction would carry over directly.
  • Beyond the paper: the rank-$(s-4)$ Weyl symmetry plays the role of the $\beta$ Lagrange multiplier turned into a gauge symmetry, which suggests interpreting the double-traceless condition geometrically as a Weyl-equivalence class of gauge fields rather than an intrinsic restriction.
  • Beyond the paper: because the massive formulation for arbitrary spin is already known to admit a two-field reformulation, the massless limit of that reformulation should coincide with $S_\alpha$; verifying that limit would give an independent test of the construction.
  • Beyond the paper: the same Stueckelberg trick of absorbing a trace constraint into a lower-rank field could be applied to mixed-symmetry tensors and to transversely invariant higher-spin models, potentially reducing their field content too.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a local action S_alpha[phi, alpha] for free massless integer-spin particles in flat space, using only two unconstrained symmetric fields: a rank-s field phi and a rank-(s-3) Stueckelberg field alpha. The construction starts from the Fronsdal action and applies two field redefinitions: the shift (20) that turns constrained diffeomorphisms into full diffeomorphisms via alpha, and the triangular completion (34) that makes a double-traceless combination varphi(tilde phi), trading the rank-(s-4) Lagrange multiplier beta for a rank-(s-4) Weyl symmetry. The resulting action is claimed to be invariant under WSDiff, i.e., unconstrained diffeomorphisms plus a Weyl-like symmetry. After the partial gauge fixing (43), the equations of motion reduce to the Francia-Sagnotti equations F(phi) - 3 d d d alpha = 0. For s=4, the paper gives the explicit local action (45), claims to functionally integrate out alpha to obtain the nonlocal WSDiff action (47), and studies a two-parameter family of nonlocal Diff-invariant actions to isolate (47) and (49) as the unique spin-4-only models within that family. It also presents a complete basis of rank-4 projection and transition operators.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper gives the minimal local off-shell formulation of free higher-spin massless fields in flat space, with a transparent route from Fronsdal theory to the unconstrained equations obtained from the tensionless string. A notable strength is that the local action is constructed by explicit, parameter-free field redefinitions from the Fronsdal action, so the result is self-contained rather than fitted to known equations. The spin-4 projection-operator basis is a useful byproduct. The physical equivalence of the local action to Fronsdal theory is credible because alpha enters through an invertible Stueckelberg shift and the double trace is a Weyl orbit, although the manuscript justifies this through a cited theorem rather than by displaying the direct argument. The main weaknesses are concentrated in the s=4 nonlocal part: the passage to (47) is asserted without derivation, and the uniqueness claim in the abstract is stronger than what the two-parameter analysis actually proves.

major comments (3)
  1. [4.1, Eqs. (45)-(47)] The derivation of the nonlocal WSDiff action (47) from S_alpha is not shown. Because the alpha-sector of (45) contains a fourth-order kinetic term (9 alpha Box^2 alpha) and alpha has a pure-gauge mode inherited from the unconstrained diffeomorphisms (delta alpha = Lambda'), the elimination of alpha is not a one-line Gaussian completion: one must handle the gauge degeneracy and verify the resulting nonlocal operator coefficient by coefficient. I ask the authors to display the completion of the square, or the gauge-fixed functional integral with the associated determinant, or to provide a computer-algebra appendix verifying (47). Without this, the nonlocal WSDiff action and the subsequent uniqueness statements built on it are not established.
  2. [2.1 and Section 3, gauge-fixing arguments] The equivalence of S_alpha to the Fronsdal action is justified by invoking the pure-gauge theorem of [40], but the hypotheses of that theorem are not stated and are not checked for the fourth-order action (45). Since the construction itself supplies explicit transformations, the authors should give a direct argument: alpha is removed by the invertible shift (20), and the double-trace condition in (43) can be reached along the Weyl orbit (37). Please either provide that direct proof or verify the hypotheses of [40]; as written, the degree-of-freedom count rests on a citation whose applicability to this Stueckelberg system is not demonstrated.
  3. [Abstract and Section 4.2, Tables 2 and 3] The abstract states that functional integration over alpha leads to a 'unique non local Weyl and diffeomorphism invariant action'. The body establishes uniqueness only within the two-parameter family S(a,b) defined in (50)-(51), after imposing the absence of extra massless poles. This leaves open the possibility of other WSDiff-invariant nonlocal operators outside that ansatz. The claim should be sharpened to uniqueness within S(a,b), as the conclusions already phrase it, or a broader uniqueness proof should be supplied.
minor comments (4)
  1. [4.2.4, Eq. (75)] The gauge-fixing term in (75) is labelled L^(3)_g.f, but that label is already used for (70); the second one should be L^(4)_g.f.
  2. [Section 5, final paragraph before acknowledgements] The text says 'The results are summarized in tables 1-5', but only Tables 1 through 4 appear; the reference should be corrected to Tables 1-4.
  3. [Appendix A, Eq. (86)] Equation (86) ends with 'omega^alpha_sigma ... ,' including a stray comma after the final tensor; the comma should be removed.
  4. [Section 5, conclusions] The word 'geralized' in the final paragraph is a typo and should read 'generalized'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: S_alpha is built from explicit invertible field redefinitions, and the nonlocal s=4 results are checked against an independent two-parameter ansatz.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The central object S_alpha in (41) is defined as S_F[phi[phi_tilde(phi,alpha)]], where phi_tilde = phi - d f(alpha) in (20) is an invertible Stueckelberg-type redefinition and phi(phi) in (34) is a finite algebraic completion to a double-traceless tensor; both maps are explicitly given, and the composition has no fitted or free parameters calibrated to the target equations. The target equation (44), F(phi) - 3 d d d alpha = 0, follows from the exact identity F(phi_tilde) = F(phi) - 3 d d d alpha in (21) after the gauge condition (43), and (43) is justified by the explicit transformation properties of phi_tilde'' under the Weyl symmetry (37), not by assuming the result. The s=4 nonlocal actions (47) and (49) are obtained by direct elimination or integration over alpha, and the uniqueness claim is then checked independently against the two-parameter family S(a,b) in (50)-(51) by computing propagator residues in Cases I-IV; the uniqueness is therefore a derived consequence within that family, not an input. The only self-citation, [58] for spin-3 projection operators, is background: Appendix A states the full rank-4 operator basis explicitly, so the paper does not import its central content from a reference by the same authors. The cited pure-gauge theorem [40] is an external result; whether its hypotheses cover the higher-derivative term alpha box^2 alpha is a validity or correctness question, not circularity. A presentation caveat is that the abstract's word 'unique' is stronger than the body's proof, which establishes uniqueness only within the S(a,b) ansatz, but that is an overstatement of scope rather than a circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard higher-spin formalism (Fronsdal theory), an external theorem on pure-gauge fields, and standard algebraic tensor decompositions. No fitted parameters or invented entities are required; the coefficients in the field redefinition are fixed by the constraint that the composite field is double traceless.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Fronsdal action S_F[phi] with doubly traceless phi and its constrained gauge invariance, as given in [23] and summarized in (1)-(6).
    The paper builds directly on the Fronsdal formulation; all constructions are field redefinitions or extensions of S_F. Invoked in the opening of Section 2.
  • domain assumption The pure gauge theorem of Motohashi, Suyama and Takahashi [40], which allows fixing alpha = 0 at the action level without losing physical content.
    Invoked in Section 2.1 to justify eliminating the Stueckelberg field alpha and, in Section 3, to justify the gauge condition (43). This is an external theorem, not proven here.
  • standard math The decomposition (15)-(16) of a symmetric rank-(s-1) tensor into a traceless part and trace-dependent pieces, with coefficients fixed by denominators D+2(s-3-j).
    Used in the field redefinition (20) and is a standard algebraic identity for symmetric tensors; restated from [38].
  • domain assumption For a doubly traceless symmetric tensor, the Einstein-like equations G=0 are equivalent to F=0, inherited from Fronsdal theory.
    Used to reduce the equations of motion of S_alpha to F[phi]=0 around (38)-(39) and (42).
  • domain assumption The unitarity criterion: a massless pole is physical if the residue of the two-point amplitude is positive, as used in Section 4.2.
    Standard quantum field theory criterion for particle content; stated around (54).
  • standard math The completeness of the rank-4 spin projection and transition operators in Appendix A, satisfying the algebra (88) and identity (89).
    The paper constructs these projectors and verifies their algebra; it assumes this basis spans all quadratic operators needed for the analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of More on unconstrained descriptions of Higher Spin Massless Particles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FTB44USV

@misc{pith2026250101596,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: More on unconstrained descriptions of Higher Spin Massless Particles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FTB44USV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01596}
}
abstract

Here we suggest a new local action describing arbitrary integer spin-$s$ massless particles in terms of only two symmetric fields $\varphi $ and $\alpha$ of rank-$s$ and $(s-3)$ respectively. It is an unconstrained version of the Fronsdal theory where the double traceless constraint on the physical field is evaded via a rank-$(s-4)$ Weyl like symmetry. The constrained higher spin diffeomorphism is enlarged to full diffeomorphism via the Stueckelberg field $\alpha$ through an appropriate field redefinition. After a partial gauge fixing where the Weyl symmetry is broken while preserving diffeomorphisms, the field equations reproduce, for arbitrary integer spin-$s$, diffeomorphism invariant equations of motion previously obtained via a truncation of the spectrum of the open bosonic string field theory in the tensionless limit. In the $s=4$ case we show that the functional integration over $\alpha$ leads to a unique non local Weyl and diffeomorphism invariant action given only in terms of the physical field $\varphi$ whose spectrum is confirmed via an analysis of the analytic structure of the spin-4 propagator for which we introduce a complete basis of projection and transition non local differential operators. We also show that the elimination of $\alpha$ after the Weyl gauge fixing leads to a non local diffeomorphism invariant action previously obtained in the literature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [40]

    Motohashi, T

    H. Motohashi, T. Suyama and K. Takahashi, Phys.Rev. D94, 124 021 (2016); H. Moto- hashi, T. Suyama and M. Yamaguchi, JHEP 06, 133 (2018)

    work page 2016

  2. [1]

    Anders Bengtsson, Higher Spin Field Theory, Vol 1+2, De Gruyte r, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [2]

    Snowmass White Paper: Higher Spin Gr avity and Higher Spin Symmetry,

    X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger, A. Campoleoni, M. Chiodaroli, D. Franc ia, M. Grigoriev, E. Sezgin and E. Skvortsov, “Snowmass White Paper: Higher Spin Gr avity and Higher Spin Symmetry,” [arXiv:2205.01567 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  4. [3]

    From Higher Spins to Strings: A Prime r,

    R. Rahman and M. Taronna, “From Higher Spins to Strings: A Prime r,” [arXiv:1512.07932 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  5. [4]

    Notes on Strings and Higher Spins,

    A. Sagnotti, “Notes on Strings and Higher Spins,” J. Phys., vol. A4 6, p. 214006, 2013, arXiv:1112.4285

    arXiv 2013

  6. [5]

    Nonline ar higher spin theories in various dimensions,

    X. Bekaert, S. Cnockaert, C. Iazeolla and M. A. Vasiliev, “Nonline ar higher spin theories in various dimensions,” arXiv:hep-th/0503128

    arXiv

  7. [6]

    String Lessons for Higher-Spin I nteractions

    A. Sagnotti and M. Taronna, “String Lessons for Higher-Spin I nteractions”, Nucl.Phys., vol. B842, pp. 299–361, 2011, e-Print:1006.5242 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2011

  8. [7]

    Vasiliev, 1996 Int

    M.A. Vasiliev, 1996 Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 5 763 (arXiv:hep-th/9611 024)

    work page 1996

Show all 59 references
  1. [8]

    Vasiliev, Phys.Lett.B 567 (2003) 139-151

    M.A. Vasiliev, Phys.Lett.B 567 (2003) 139-151

    2003

  2. [9]

    Weinberg, 1964 Phys

    S. Weinberg, 1964 Phys. Rev. 135 B1049

    1964

  3. [10]

    Velo G and Zwanziger D 1969 Phys. Rev. 186 1337 Velo G and Zwanz iger D 1969 Phys. Rev. 188 2218 Velo G 1972 Nucl. Phys. B 43 389. 24

    1969

  4. [11]

    Aragone and S

    C. Aragone and S. Deser 1979 Phys. Lett. B 86 161, C. Aragon e and S. Deser 1980 Nuovo Cimento B 57 33

    1979

  5. [12]

    All possible symmetries of S matrix

    S. R. Coleman and J. Mandula, “All possible symmetries of S matrix ”, Phys. Rev., vol. 159, 1251–1256, 1967

    1967

  6. [13]

    Weinberg and E

    S. Weinberg and E. Witten, Phys. Lett. B 96, 59-62 (1980) doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(80)90212-9

    1980 doi

  7. [14]

    Porrati, Phys

    M. Porrati, Phys. Rev. D 78, 065016 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.065016 [arXiv:0804.4672 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  8. [15]

    How higher-spin gra vity surpasses the spin two barrier: no-go theorems versus yes-go examples

    X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger, and P. Sundell, “How higher-spin gra vity surpasses the spin two barrier: no-go theorems versus yes-go examples”, Rev. Mod. Ph ys., vol. 84, pp. 987–1009, 2012

    2012

  9. [16]

    Massive Spin-2 Bosonic String St ates in an Electromag- netic Background,

    P. C. Argyres and C. R. Nappi, “Massive Spin-2 Bosonic String St ates in an Electromag- netic Background,” Phys. Lett., vol. B224, p. 89, 1989

    1989

  10. [17]

    Causal Propagation of a Charged Spin 3/2 Field in an External Electromagnetic Background

    M. Porrati and R. Rahman, “Causal Propagation of a Charged Spin 3/2 Field in an External Electromagnetic Background”, Phys. Rev., vol. D80, p. 025009, 2009

    2009

  11. [18]

    String Theory and Th e Velo-Zwanziger Prob- lem

    M. Porrati, R. Rahman, and A. Sagnotti, “String Theory and Th e Velo-Zwanziger Prob- lem”, Nucl. Phys., vol. B846, pp. 250–282, 2011

    2011

  12. [19]

    On spin thre e selfinteractions

    F. A. Berends, G. J. H. Burgers, and H. Van Dam, “On spin thre e selfinteractions”, Z. Phys., vol. C24, pp. 247–254, 1984

    1984

  13. [20]

    General trilinear inte raction for arbitrary even higher spin gauge fields

    R. Manvelyan, K. Mkrtchyan, and W. Ruhl,“General trilinear inte raction for arbitrary even higher spin gauge fields”, Nucl.Phys., vol. B836, pp. 204–221, 2 010

  14. [21]

    Interactin g Higher Spin Gauge Fields on the Light Front

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson, and N. Linden,“Interactin g Higher Spin Gauge Fields on the Light Front”, Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 4, p. 1333, 1987

    1987

  15. [22]

    Cubic interaction vertices for massive and massle ss higher spin fields

    R.R.Metsaev, “Cubic interaction vertices for massive and massle ss higher spin fields”, Nucl. Phys., vol. B759, pp. 147–201, 2006

    2006

  16. [23]

    Fronsdal, ‘Massless Fields with Integer Spin,” Phys

    C. Fronsdal, ‘Massless Fields with Integer Spin,” Phys. Rev. D 18, 3624 (1978) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.18.3624

    1978 doi

  17. [24]

    Dirac P A M 1936 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 155 447

    1936

  18. [25]

    Fierz, 1939 Helv

    M. Fierz, 1939 Helv. Phys. Acta 12 3, M. Fierz and W. Pauli, 1939 P roc. R. Soc. Lond. A 173 211

    1939

  19. [26]

    Hagen, 1974 Phys

    L P S Singh and C.R. Hagen, 1974 Phys. Rev. D 9 898. 25

    1974

  20. [27]

    Hagen, 1974 Phys

    L P S Singh and C.R. Hagen, 1974 Phys. Rev. D 9 910

    1974

  21. [28]

    de Wit and D Z Freedman 1980 Phys

    B. de Wit and D Z Freedman 1980 Phys. Rev. D 21 358

    1980

  22. [29]

    Gauge Fields Of Any Spin And Symmetry,

    S. Ouvry and J. Stern, “Gauge Fields Of Any Spin And Symmetry,” Phys. Lett. B177 (1986) 335

    1986

  23. [30]

    A Unified Action For Higher Spin Gauge Boso ns From Covariant String Theory,

    A. K. H. Bengtsson, “A Unified Action For Higher Spin Gauge Boso ns From Covariant String Theory,” Phys. Lett. B 182 (1986) 321; M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, in “Quan- tum Mechanics of Fundamental Systems, 2”, eds. C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli (Plenum Press, New York, 1988), p. 113

    1986

  24. [31]

    Description of the higher massless ir reducible integer spins in the BRST approach

    A. Pashnev and M. Tsulaia, “Description of the higher massless ir reducible integer spins in the BRST approach”, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 13 (1998) 1853

    1998

  25. [32]

    Lagrangian form ulation of the massless higher integer spin fields in the AdS background

    I. L. Buchbinder, A. Pashnev and M. Tsulaia, “Lagrangian form ulation of the massless higher integer spin fields in the AdS background”, Phys. Lett. B 523 (2001)338

    2001

  26. [33]

    Quarte t unconstrained formula- tion for massless higher spin fields,

    I. L. Buchbinder, A. V. Galajinsky and V. A. Krykhtin, “Quarte t unconstrained formula- tion for massless higher spin fields,” Nucl. Phys. B 779 (2007) 155 [arX iv:hep-th/0702161]

    2007 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Francia and A

    D. Francia and A. Sagnotti, Free geometric equations for highe r spins, Phys. Lett. B 543 (2002) 303 [hep-th/0207002]

    2002 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Francia and A

    D. Francia and A. Sagnotti, On the geometry of higher spin gaug e fields, Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003) S473 [hep-th/0212185]

    2003 arXiv

  29. [36]

    On higher spins and the tensionless lim it of string theory

    A. Sagnotti and M. Tsulaia,“On higher spins and the tensionless lim it of string theory”, Nucl. Phys. B 682 (2004) 83 [arXiv:hep-th/0311257]

    2004 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Francia and A

    D. Francia and A. Sagnotti, Minimal local Lagrangians for higher -spin geometry, Phys. Lett. B 624 (2005) 93 [hep-th/0507144]

    2005 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Francia, J

    D. Francia, J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti, Current exchanges an d unconstrained higher spins, Nucl. Phys. B 773 (2007) 203 [hep-th/0701163]

    2007 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Schwinger, Particles, Sources, and Fields, Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA, 1970

    J. Schwinger, Particles, Sources, and Fields, Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA, 1970

    1970

  33. [41]

    Memoires sur les equations differentielles, r elatives au probleme des isoperimetres

    M. Ostrogradsky, “Memoires sur les equations differentielles, r elatives au probleme des isoperimetres”, Mem. Acad. St. Petersbourg 6 (1850) 385

  34. [42]

    R. P. Woodard, Scholarpedia 10, 32243 (2015), arXiv: 1506.02 210 [hep-th]. 26

    2015

  35. [43]

    On the relation between local and geometric Lagra ngians for higher spins

    D. Francia, “On the relation between local and geometric Lagra ngians for higher spins”, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 222 (2010) 012002 [arXiv:1001.3854]

    2010 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Spin-(s, j) projectors and gauge -invariant spin-s actions in maximally symmetric backgrounds

    D. Hutchings and M. Ponds,“Spin-(s, j) projectors and gauge -invariant spin-s actions in maximally symmetric backgrounds” JHEP 07 (2024) 292, arXiv:2401.0 4523 [hep-th]

    2024

  37. [45]

    Fronsdal, Phys

    C. Fronsdal, Phys. Rev. D 20 (1979) 848

    1979

  38. [46]

    Massless Fields with Half Integral Spin ,

    J. Fang and C. Fronsdal, “Massless Fields with Half Integral Spin ,” Phys. Rev. D 18, 3630 (1978) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.18.3630

    1978 doi

  39. [47]

    Campoleoni A, Francia D, Mourad J and Sagnotti A 2009 Nucl. Ph ys. B 815 289 (arXiv:0810.4350 [hep-th])

    2009 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Campoleoni A, Francia D, Mourad J and Sagnotti A 2010 Nucl. Ph ys. B 828 405 (arXiv:0904.4447 [hep-th])

    2010 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Nuovo Cimento 033 123 (arXiv:0910.3155 [h ep-th])

    Campoleoni A 2010 Riv. Nuovo Cimento 033 123 (arXiv:0910.3155 [h ep-th])

    2010 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Geometric Lagrangians for massive higher-spin fie lds,

    D. Francia, “Geometric Lagrangians for massive higher-spin fie lds,” Nucl. Phys. B 796 (2008) 77 [arXiv:0710.5378 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Francia, J

    D. Francia, J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti, (A)dS exchanges and p artially-massless higher spins, Nucl. Phys. B 804 (2008) 383 [arXiv:0803.3832]

    2008 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Geometric massive higher spins and current excha nges

    D. Francia, “Geometric massive higher spins and current excha nges” Fortsch. Phys. 56 (2008) 800 [arXiv:0804.2857 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Gauge inva riant Lagrangian for- mulation of higher spin massive bosonic field theory in AdS space,

    I. L. Buchbinder, V. A. Krykhtin and P. M. Lavrov, “Gauge inva riant Lagrangian for- mulation of higher spin massive bosonic field theory in AdS space,” Nucl. Phys. B 762 (2007) 344 [arXiv:hep-th/0608005]

    2007 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Quartet unconstraine d formulation for massive higher spin fields

    I. L. Buchbinder and A. V. Galajinsky. “Quartet unconstraine d formulation for massive higher spin fields”. JHEP, 11:081, 2008

    2008

  47. [55]

    L. P. S. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2236 (1981)

    1981

  48. [56]

    Skvortsov and M

    E. Skvortsov and M. Vasiliev, Transverse invariant higher spin fi elds, Phys. Lett. B 664 (2008) 301 [hep-th/0701278]

    2008 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Nutma, Comput

    T. Nutma, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1719-1738 (2014) doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.02.006 [arXiv:1308.3493 [cs.SC]]

    2014 arXiv

  50. [58]

    E. L. Mendon¸ ca and R. Schimidt Bittencourt, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2020, 8425745 (2020) doi:10.1155/2020/8425745 [arXiv:1902.05118 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Barker, C

    W. Barker, C. Marzo and C. Rigouzzo, [arXiv:2406.09500 [hep-th ]]. 27

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.