Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 66 references

Bell nonlocality with directly generated telecom-band spin-photon entanglement

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single rubidium atom directly emits telecom C-band photons entangled with its spin, with a Bell-state fidelity above 91.4%, and the pair violates a Bell inequality with S = 2.455(77) > 2.

desk verdict A genuine experimental milestone—direct C-band telecom photons from a single rubidium atom with a CHSH violation—but the Bell nonlocality claim leans on an unstated fair-sampling assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08109 v1 pith:FUTG3PX7 submitted 2026-08-08 quant-ph physics.atom-ph

Dong-Yu Huang , Jian Wang , Xiao-Long Zhou , Ze-Min Shen , Si-Jian He , Qi-Yang Huang , Yi-Jia Liu , Yu-Shu Chen
show 3 more authors
Quan Jiang Chuan-Feng Li Guang-Can Guo
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.atom-ph
keywords spin-photonentanglementtelecomC-bandBellnonlocalityCHSHinequalityneutralatomcavityQEDrubidium-87single-photonemitter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first direct generation of telecom C-band (1530 nm) photons from a single neutral atom, with the photon's polarization entangled to the atom's ground-state spin. The authors drive a rubidium-87 atom through a cascaded dipole transition inside a fiber cavity, herald the emission with a 780 nm photon, and measure a Bell-state fidelity lower bound of 91.4%. They then observe a CHSH inequality violation S = 2.455(77) > 2, which they interpret as manifesting Bell nonlocality in the directly generated C-band spin-photon pair. The result matters because C-band is the minimum-loss window of optical fiber, so a direct emitter avoids the noise and inefficiency of quantum frequency conversion and could become a building block for atom-based quantum networks.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the cavity-assisted cascade transition in 87Rb: 4D_{5/2}(F''=4,m=0) decays to 5P_{3/2}(F'=3,m=±1) emitting a 1530 nm photon, then to 5S_{1/2}(F=2,m=±1) emitting a 780 nm herald. A fiber Fabry–Pérot cavity enhances the 780 nm decay (cooperativity ≈9), providing a herald that gates the telecom photon detection; a polarization prism discards σ-polarized 780 nm light so only the π herald is used. Atomic-qubit measurement is done by a stimulated-Raman state-selective transfer that maps an arbitrary basis {|ψ⟩,|ψ*⟩} onto hyperfine-level discrimination, followed by cavity-assisted fluorescence readout with 99.1% fidelity. The two-photon excitation Rabi frequency is set to 60 MHz so the unwanted 4D_{5/2},F''=2 channel is suppressed.

What would settle it

Measure the CHSH parameter without post-selection by assigning a fixed outcome to every non-detected event and including all trials in S; if the result falls to 2 or below, the fair-sampling assumption is violated. Alternatively, repeat the Bell test with a detection scheme whose efficiency exceeds the ~67% threshold for closing the detection loophole in a two-qubit CHSH test and check whether S remains above 2.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a single 87Rb atom can serve as a direct, resonant emitter of telecom C-band photons while preserving high-fidelity entanglement between the photon polarization and the atomic spin. Using the 4D_{5/2}–5P_{3/2}–5S_{1/2} cascade, resonant two-photon excitation puts the atom into 4D_{5/2}; its decay produces a 1530 nm photon whose σ polarization is correlated with the intermediate-state Zeeman level, and the subsequent Purcell-enhanced 780 nm decay herald completes the transfer to the ground-state spin. The measured parity oscillation contrast is 0.90, the Bell-state fidelity lower bound is 91.4%, and the CHSH parameter is 2.455(77), exceeding the local bound 2 by 5.9 standard deviations. The paper concludes that this directly generated telecom-band spin-photon pair manifests Bell nonlocality.

Load-bearing premise

The Bell nonlocality conclusion assumes that the detected events—coincidences of a 1530 nm photon, a 780 nm herald, and an atom that is still present—are a fair sample of all generated entangled pairs; because the overall heralded telecom detection efficiency is only 5×10⁻⁵, a local hidden variable model with detection bias could in principle reproduce the observed S = 2.455.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A neutral atom can now interface directly with the telecom C-band, matching the lowest-loss window of optical fiber, without the noise and efficiency penalty of quantum frequency conversion.
  • The measured Bell-state fidelity, with lower bound 91.4%, exceeds the threshold required for a Bell test, and the observed CHSH violation of 2.455(77) demonstrates nonlocal correlations usable in quantum communication protocols.
  • The generation efficiency, currently limited by free-space collection and the aberration of the aspherical lens, can be improved by more than an order of magnitude with C-band-optimized microscope objectives.
  • Using a polarization-nondegenerate cavity to enhance only the π decay would remove the need for the 780 nm herald, raising brightness and overall entanglement generation efficiency.
  • Encoding the atomic qubit in magnetic-insensitive levels with dynamic decoupling could extend coherence from 107 µs to hundreds of milliseconds, making large-scale quantum communication feasible.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the Bell test post-selects on detected telecom photons, the reported nonlocality is conditional on fair sampling; a detection-loophole-free test would require raising the heralded telecom detection efficiency far above its current 5×10⁻⁵.
  • If the collection efficiency can be improved as the paper suggests, this direct-emission scheme could be more practical for long-distance entanglement distribution than frequency-conversion approaches, since it removes conversion noise and extra hardware.
  • The same cascade transition and state-selective Raman measurement could be adapted to other alkali atoms with telecom transitions, or to atom arrays inside fiber cavities, providing a path to multiplexed quantum repeaters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper reports an experiment in which a single 87Rb atom is trapped in an optical tweezer inside a fiber Fabry-Pérot cavity and resonantly excited by a two-photon pulse. The subsequent cascaded decay produces a 780 nm herald photon and a 1530 nm C-band photon whose polarization is entangled with the atomic spin. The authors characterize the state with population and parity measurements, report a Bell-state fidelity lower bound of 91.4%, and measure a CHSH parameter S = 2.455(77) > 2. They interpret this as the first demonstration of Bell nonlocality for a directly generated telecom-band spin-photon pair from a neutral atom.

Significance. If the central claim is accepted with the appropriate caveats, this is a meaningful experimental step for atom-based quantum networks: it brings a single-atom source directly to the low-loss telecom C-band and provides high-fidelity spin-photon entanglement. The CHSH estimate is a direct count-based correlation with a reported standard error, and no parameter is fitted to produce the violation; the experimental protocol is described in considerable detail. The main limitation is that the Bell test is post-selected, with a telecom-arm detection efficiency of 5e-4 and an overall heralded efficiency of 5e-5, so the nonlocality conclusion requires an explicit fair-sampling assumption that is not stated. The fidelity bound also lacks a statistical uncertainty. With those qualifications, the result is a solid experimental advance.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental protocol and CHSH test (Eq. (9))] The claim that the measured S = 2.455(77) 'rule[s] out any local hidden variable models' and 'manifest[s] Bell nonlocality' is not supported as stated. The Bell test is post-selected on detection of the 1530 nm photon: the paper reports an overall heralded detection efficiency of 5e-5 for that photon, the product of a 780 nm heralding efficiency of 0.1 and a telecom-arm detection efficiency of 5e-4. With such a low telecom-arm efficiency, local hidden variable models with detection bias can produce CHSH values above 2, so the violation is meaningful only under an explicit fair-sampling assumption. The authors should state that assumption, qualify the abstract and conclusion claims (e.g., 'CHSH violation under fair sampling'), and remove the phrase 'rule out any local hidden variable models' unless a detection-efficiency model is provided.
  2. [Fidelity estimate, Eq. (8) and Fig. 4(c)] The reported Bell-state fidelity lower bound of 91.4% has no statistical uncertainty. Because the abstract and conclusion treat 'fidelity exceeding 91.4%' as a headline quantitative result, the authors should propagate the counting statistics of the populations in Eq. (8) and report a standard error or confidence interval, and state whether the lower-bound formula is still valid when the measured populations fluctuate.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Experimental protocol] The Rabi frequency is quoted as 60 MHz in the main text and 61 MHz in Fig. 2(b); please reconcile these values.
  2. [Characterization of the spin–photon entanglement] In Eq. (8), the notation P_ab is not fully defined: please state explicitly that the first index refers to the photonic polarization basis and the second to the atomic basis, and define the arrow states used in the nonclassical basis.
  3. [Characterization of the spin–photon entanglement] The paper should provide the raw counts (or at least the number of valid trials) behind each of the four correlation terms in Eq. (9), so the quoted standard error of 0.077 can be independently verified.
  4. [Characterization of the spin–photon entanglement] Reference [48] is a loophole-free Bell test in a superconducting platform, not a fidelity-threshold reference; the authors should replace it with a source that states the Bell-state fidelity threshold for a fair-sampling CHSH test, or derive the threshold.
  5. [Characterization of the spin–photon entanglement] The atom-presence check at the end of the sequence in Fig. 4(a) is a form of post-selection; the authors should comment on whether atom loss could be correlated with the atomic measurement outcome.
  6. [Conclusion and Discussion] The conclusion says 'for the first time'; please specify the comparison class, for example the first neutral-atom source with direct C-band emission and a CHSH violation under fair sampling.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Bell violation is a directly measured count-based quantity, and the detection-efficiency caveat is a correctness risk, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained. The spin-photon entangled state of Eq. (4) is produced by a stated atomic cascade and angular-momentum selection rules, not by fitting; the Bell-state fidelity lower bound of 91.4% is evaluated from measured populations via Eq. (8), using the external fidelity-estimation method of ref. [47] with the formula displayed in the paper; and the CHSH parameter S = 2.455(77) of Eq. (9) is a direct sum of measured correlation functions, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The only self-citations are to the authors' prior apparatus and methods: ref. [36] for cavity-assisted readout, ref. [40] for a CHSH-type Bell inequality, and ref. [43] for supplemental efficiency and fidelity details. These are not load-bearing in the sense required for circularity: the readout is independently calibrated in-house at 99.1% (Fig. 3(c)), the CHSH inequality is a standard externally established result also cited in ref. [1], and Eq. (9) defines the measured quantity without relying on ref. [40]. The substantial caveat in the paper is the very low telecom detection efficiency (overall heralded detection efficiency 5e-5, telecom-arm detection efficiency 5e-4), which means the 'manifesting Bell nonlocality' claim rests on the unstated fair-sampling assumption and leaves the detection loophole open. That is a validity limitation of the nonlocality claim, not a circular derivation; the measured fidelity and direct C-band emission results are unaffected. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited, and the circularity score is minimal.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result is an experimental measurement, so the main assumptions are physical assumptions about the level scheme, collection geometry, and validity of the Bell test on post-selected data. No fitting parameters are used to obtain S. No invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics and projective measurement formalism are assumed throughout, including the use of the CHSH inequality to certify nonlocality.
    The whole analysis is quantum state characterization and a Bell test within conventional quantum mechanics.
  • domain assumption The quantization axis and dipole selection rules ensure that telecom photons from pi decay are not collected by the lens placed along the quantization axis, so detected photons are sigma-plus and sigma-minus, entangled with atomic mF=plus or minus 1.
    This is the mechanism producing the entangled state (Eq. 1). Finite collection solid angle and lens aberrations can introduce pi-photon contamination; the paper does not quantify residual leakage.
  • standard math The fidelity bound in Eq. (8) from ref 47 correctly lower-bounds the Bell state fidelity from measured populations and coherence terms.
    The calculation follows Blinov et al.; no derivation is shown in this paper.
  • domain assumption Fair sampling: detection of a telecom photon is independent of measurement settings and representative of the emitted ensemble.
    Required for the CHSH violation to rule out local hidden variables; not stated explicitly and not justified given 5e-5 detection efficiency.
  • domain assumption The Raman transfer and cavity-assisted readout implement ideal projective measurements in arbitrary bases, with residual errors small enough not to change the conclusions.
    The paper characterizes transfer probability 97% and readout fidelity 99.1%, but does not propagate these errors into the fidelity or Bell parameter.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bell nonlocality with directly generated telecom-band spin-photon entanglement." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FUTG3PX7

@misc{pith2026260808109,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bell nonlocality with directly generated telecom-band spin-photon entanglement},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FUTG3PX7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08109}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum nonlocality, typically revealed through entanglement distribution across quantum networks, is a cornerstone of quantum information science. Long-distance distribution of entanglement requires the information carrier, i.e. flying photons, to operate in the minimum-loss telecom band of optical fiber. While extensive efforts have been devoted to the direct generation of entanglement between C-band telecom photons and various stationary spins, the verification of quantum nonlocality remains an outstanding challenge. Here, utilizing a dipole transition in rubidium atoms with a wavelength of 1530 nm and a cavity-assisted protocol, we achieve resonant excitation and direct emission of C-band telecom photons from a single atom, generating spin-photon entanglement with a measured Bell state fidelity exceeding 91.4%. We then verify Bell nonlocality by observing a Bell inequality violation of 2.455(77) > 2 using this high-quality entangled pair. These results extend the wavelength of a single-atom quantum emitter to the telecom C-band, achieving sufficiently high-fidelity spin-photon entanglement to finally verify Bell nonlocality. This work thereby provides a promising building block for a large-scale atom-based quantum network capable of distributed quantum metrology and long-distance quantum communication.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08109 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup. An [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Protocol for entanglement generation between a single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) State-selective transfer scheme of atomic qubit measurement. For a laser configuration with the polarization of Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Experimental time sequence for characterizing the generated spin–photon entanglement. The main sequence begins [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Brunner, D

    N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, and S. Wehner, Bell nonlocality, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 419 (2014)

    2014

  2. [2]

    Portmann and R

    C. Portmann and R. Renner, Security in quantum cryp- tography, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 025008 (2022)

    2022

  3. [3]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    2008

  4. [4]

    W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek, A single quantum cannot be cloned, Nature299, 802 (1982)

    1982

  5. [5]

    Briegel, W

    H.-J. Briegel, W. D¨ ur, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Quan- tum repeaters: The role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 5932 (1998)

    1998

  6. [6]

    Couteauet al., Applications of single photons to quan- tum communication and computing, Nat

    C. Couteauet al., Applications of single photons to quan- tum communication and computing, Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 326 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    See [43] for more details

    Telecom bands in optical fibers span from 1250 nm to 1650 nm, with the C-band (1530–1565 nm) exhibiting the minimum loss. See [43] for more details

    work page

  8. [8]

    Wanget al., Twin-field quantum key distribution over 830-km fibre, Nat

    S. Wanget al., Twin-field quantum key distribution over 830-km fibre, Nat. Photon.16, 154 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Liuet al., Experimental twin-field quantum key dis- tribution over 1000 km fiber distance, Phys

    Y. Liuet al., Experimental twin-field quantum key dis- tribution over 1000 km fiber distance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 210801 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Casaboneet al., Dynamic control of Purcell enhanced emission of erbium ions in nanoparticles, Nature Com- munications12, 3570 (2021)

    B. Casaboneet al., Dynamic control of Purcell enhanced emission of erbium ions in nanoparticles, Nature Com- munications12, 3570 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Liuet al., On-demand storage of photonic qubits at telecom wavelengths, Phys

    D.-C. Liuet al., On-demand storage of photonic qubits at telecom wavelengths, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 210501 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Ulanowski, B

    A. Ulanowski, B. Merkel, and A. Reiserer, Spectral mul- tiplexing of telecom emitters with stable transition fre- quency, Sci. Adv.8, eabo4538 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Ourariet al., Indistinguishable telecom band photons from a single Er ion in the solid state, Nature620, 977 (2023)

    S. Ourariet al., Indistinguishable telecom band photons from a single Er ion in the solid state, Nature620, 977 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    L. Yang, S. Wang, M. Shen, J. Xie, and H. X. Tang, Controlling single rare earth ion emission in an electro- optical nanocavity, Nat. Commun.14, 1718 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Yuet al., Telecom-band quantum dot technologies for long-distance quantum networks, Nat

    Y. Yuet al., Telecom-band quantum dot technologies for long-distance quantum networks, Nat. Nanotechnol.18, 1389 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    H. Zhao, M. T. Pettes, Y. Zheng, and H. Htoon, Site- controlled telecom-wavelength single-photon emitters in atomically-thin mote2, Nat. Commun.12, 6753 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Yuet al., Frequency tunable, cavity-enhanced single erbium quantum emitter in the telecom band, Phys

    Y. Yuet al., Frequency tunable, cavity-enhanced single erbium quantum emitter in the telecom band, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 170801 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Holewaet al., High-throughput quantum photonic de- vices emitting indistinguishable photons in the telecom c-band, Nat

    P. Holewaet al., High-throughput quantum photonic de- vices emitting indistinguishable photons in the telecom c-band, Nat. Commun.15, 3358 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Hauseret al., Deterministic and highly indistinguish- 7 able single photons in the telecom c-band, Nat

    N. Hauseret al., Deterministic and highly indistinguish- 7 able single photons in the telecom c-band, Nat. Commun. 17, 537 (2026)

    2026

  12. [20]

    M¨ ulleret al., A quantum light-emitting diode for the standard telecom window around 1,550 nm, Nat

    T. M¨ ulleret al., A quantum light-emitting diode for the standard telecom window around 1,550 nm, Nat. Com- mun.9, 862 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Laccotripeset al., Spin-photon entanglement with di- rect photon emission in the telecom C-band, Nat

    P. Laccotripeset al., Spin-photon entanglement with di- rect photon emission in the telecom C-band, Nat. Com- mun.15, 9740 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    M. T. Uysalet al., Spin-photon entanglement of a single er3+ ion in the telecom band, Phys. Rev. X15, 011071 (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    Reiserer and G

    A. Reiserer and G. Rempe, Cavity-based quantum net- works with single atoms and optical photons, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1379 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    J. P. Covey, H. Weinfurter, and H. Bernien, Quantum networks with neutral atom processing nodes, npj Quan- tum Inf.9, 90 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Radnaevet al., Universal neutral-atom quantum com- puter with individual optical addressing and nondestruc- tive readout, PRX Quantum6, 030334 (2025)

    A. Radnaevet al., Universal neutral-atom quantum com- puter with individual optical addressing and nondestruc- tive readout, PRX Quantum6, 030334 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    Bluvsteinet al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature626, 58 (2024)

    D. Bluvsteinet al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature626, 58 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Liet al., Parallelized telecom quantum networking with an ytterbium-171 atom array, Nat

    L. Liet al., Parallelized telecom quantum networking with an ytterbium-171 atom array, Nat. Phys.21, 1826 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    M. C. T. Bahaa E. A. Saleh,Fundamentals of Photonics (Wiley, 2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    van Leentet al., Long-distance distribution of atom- photon entanglement at telecom wavelength, Phys

    T. van Leentet al., Long-distance distribution of atom- photon entanglement at telecom wavelength, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 010510 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    T. v. Leentet al., Entangling single atoms over 33 km telecom fibre, Nature607, 69 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    B¨ uki, P

    M. B¨ uki, P. Malik, F. Fertig, T. Frank, M. Scholz, T. Block, G. Chiarella, Y. Zhou, E. Distante, P. Far- rera, G. Rempe, and H. Weinfurter, Metropolitan entan- glement distribution between an atom and a near-visible photon, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2026)

    2026

  24. [32]

    Luet al., Device-independent quantum key distri- bution over 100 km with single atoms, Science391, 592 (2026)

    B.-W. Luet al., Device-independent quantum key distri- bution over 100 km with single atoms, Science391, 592 (2026)

    2026

  25. [33]

    Chaneli` ere, D

    T. Chaneli` ere, D. N. Matsukevich, S. D. Jenkins, T. A. B. Kennedy, M. S. Chapman, and A. Kuzmich, Quantum telecommunication based on atomic cascade transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 093604 (2006)

    2006

  26. [34]

    Changet al., Long-distance entanglement between a multiplexed quantum memory and a telecom photon, Phys

    W. Changet al., Long-distance entanglement between a multiplexed quantum memory and a telecom photon, Phys. Rev. X9, 041033 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Chiarella, T

    G. Chiarella, T. Frank, L. Zuka, P. Farrera, and G. Rempe, Source of heralded atom-photon entanglement for quantum networking, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 240802 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Wanget al., Ultrafast high-fidelity state readout of single neutral atom, Phys

    J. Wanget al., Ultrafast high-fidelity state readout of single neutral atom, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 240802 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Colombeet al., Strong atom–field coupling for bose– einstein condensates in an optical cavity on a chip, Na- ture450, 272 (2007)

    Y. Colombeet al., Strong atom–field coupling for bose– einstein condensates in an optical cavity on a chip, Na- ture450, 272 (2007)

    2007

  30. [38]

    Brekenfeld, D

    M. Brekenfeld, D. Niemietz, J. D. Christesen, and G. Rempe, A quantum network node with crossed op- tical fibre cavities, Nature Physics16, 647 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Grinkemeyeret al., Error-detected quantum opera- tions with neutral atoms mediated by an optical cavity, Science387, 1301 (2025)

    B. Grinkemeyeret al., Error-detected quantum opera- tions with neutral atoms mediated by an optical cavity, Science387, 1301 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    Wanget al., Purcell-enhanced generation of photonic bell states via the inelastic scattering off single atoms, Phys

    J. Wanget al., Purcell-enhanced generation of photonic bell states via the inelastic scattering off single atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 053401 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Hofmannet al., Heralded entanglement between widely separated atoms, Science337, 72 (2012)

    J. Hofmannet al., Heralded entanglement between widely separated atoms, Science337, 72 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    Safari, E

    A. Safari, E. Oh, P. Huft, G. Chase, J. Zhang, and M. Saffman, Efficient and compact quantum network node based on a parabolic mirror on an optical chip, PRX Quantum7, 033008 (2026)

    2026

  35. [43]

    See supplemental material for additional information about entanglement generation effciency, fidelity estima- tion, analysis of different wavelength in entanglement generation, and future scalability and compatibility with Rydberg-mediated gates

  36. [44]

    Miguel-S´ anchezet al., Cavity quantum electrodynam- ics with charge-controlled quantum dots coupled to a fiber fabry–perot cavity, New J

    J. Miguel-S´ anchezet al., Cavity quantum electrodynam- ics with charge-controlled quantum dots coupled to a fiber fabry–perot cavity, New J. Phys.15, 045002 (2013)

    2013

  37. [45]

    Cuiet al., Polarization nondegenerate fiber fabry- perot cavities with large tunable splittings, Appl

    J.-M. Cuiet al., Polarization nondegenerate fiber fabry- perot cavities with large tunable splittings, Appl. Phys. Lett.112, 171105 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Rosenfeldet al., Event-ready bell test using entan- gled atoms simultaneously closing detection and locality loopholes, Phys

    W. Rosenfeldet al., Event-ready bell test using entan- gled atoms simultaneously closing detection and locality loopholes, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 010402 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    B. B. Blinov, D. L. Moehring, L.-M. Duan, and C. Mon- roe, Observation of entanglement between a single trapped atom and a single photon, Nature428, 153 (2004)

    2004

  40. [48]

    Storzet al., Loophole-free Bell inequality violation with superconducting circuits, Nature617, 265 (2023)

    S. Storzet al., Loophole-free Bell inequality violation with superconducting circuits, Nature617, 265 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    K¨ orberet al., Decoherence-protected memory for a single-photon qubit, Nat

    M. K¨ orberet al., Decoherence-protected memory for a single-photon qubit, Nat. Photon.12, 18 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    Uphoff, M

    M. Uphoff, M. Brekenfeld, G. Rempe, and S. Ritter, An integrated quantum repeater at telecom wavelength with single atoms in optical fiber cavities, Appl. Phys. B122, 46 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    S. G. Menon, K. Singh, J. Borregaard, and H. Bernien, Nanophotonic quantum network node with neutral atoms and an integrated telecom interface, New J. Phys.22, 073033 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    J. P. Coveyet al., Telecom-band quantum optics with ytterbium atoms and silicon nanophotonics, Phys. Rev. Appl.11, 034044 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    W. Huie, S. G. Menon, H. Bernien, and J. P. Covey, Multiplexed telecommunication-band quantum network- ing with atom arrays in optical cavities, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043154 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    H. J. Manetschet al., A tweezer array with 6,100 highly coherent atomic qubits, Nature647, 60 (2025)

    2025

  47. [55]

    Bluvsteinet al., A fault-tolerant neutral-atom archi- tecture for universal quantum computation, Nature649, 39 (2026)

    D. Bluvsteinet al., A fault-tolerant neutral-atom archi- tecture for universal quantum computation, Nature649, 39 (2026)

    2026

  48. [56]

    Telleret al., Integrating a fiber cavity into a wheel trap for strong ion–cavity coupling, A VS Quantum Sci- ence5, 012001 (2023)

    M. Telleret al., Integrating a fiber cavity into a wheel trap for strong ion–cavity coupling, A VS Quantum Sci- ence5, 012001 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Chenet al., Design and fabrication of metal- shielded fiber-cavity mirrors for ion-trap systems, Quan- tum Science and Technology11, 015045 (2026)

    W.-B. Chenet al., Design and fabrication of metal- shielded fiber-cavity mirrors for ion-trap systems, Quan- tum Science and Technology11, 015045 (2026)

    2026

  50. [58]

    W. Wang, D. Fomra, A. Agrawal, H. J. Lezec, and J. W. Britton, Can tcos transform cavity-qed? (2025)

    2025

  51. [59]

    Kong,Towards many-body physics with Rydberg- dressed cavity polaritons, Ph.D

    H. Kong,Towards many-body physics with Rydberg- dressed cavity polaritons, Ph.D. thesis, University of Wa- terloo (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    Chen,A Platform for Cavity Quantum Electrody- namics with Rydberg Atom Arrays, Ph.D

    Y.-T. Chen,A Platform for Cavity Quantum Electrody- namics with Rydberg Atom Arrays, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    K´ om´ aret al., A quantum network of clocks, Nature 8 Physics10, 582 (2014)

    P. K´ om´ aret al., A quantum network of clocks, Nature 8 Physics10, 582 (2014)

    2014

  54. [62]

    J. P. Covey, I. Pikovski, and J. Borregaard, Probing curved spacetime with a distributed atomic processor clock, PRX Quantum6, 030310 (2025)

    2025

  55. [63]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum inter- net: A vision for the road ahead, Science362, eaam9288 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    Zhouet al., Active stabilization of multi-parameter in amo experiments with a single digital servo, Opt

    X.-L. Zhouet al., Active stabilization of multi-parameter in amo experiments with a single digital servo, Opt. Laser Technol.167, 109791 (2023)

    2023

  57. [65]

    Shenet al., Continuously and widely tunable frequency-stabilized laser based on an optical frequency comb, Rev

    Z.-M. Shenet al., Continuously and widely tunable frequency-stabilized laser based on an optical frequency comb, Rev. Sci. Instrum.94, 023001 (2023). METHODS Experimental setup An overview of the experimental setup is given in Ex- tended Data Fig. 1 and Extended Data Table. I....

    2023

  58. [66]

    Acknowledgement This work is supported by National Key R&D Program (No

    The digital servo mentioned above also serves for the power stabilization of the two Raman lasers, to eliminate long-term drift of the Rabi frequency which degrades the transfer efficiency. Acknowledgement This work is supported by National Key R&D Program (No. 2024YF A1409402...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.