Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 52 references

On integrals of the tronqu\'{e}e solutions and the associated Hamiltonians for the Painlev\'{e} II equation

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves explicit asymptotic constants for integrals of Painlevé II tronquée solutions and their Hamiltonians.

desk verdict Solid extension of Painlevé II integral asymptotics; the constant terms are new and match known cases, but the proof of Theorem 1.3 needs a uniformity argument and Eq. (4.23) has a misprinted factor. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01532 v2 pith:FVC4H25R submitted 2019-08-05 math-ph math.CAmath.MP

Dan Dai , Shuai-Xia Xu , Lun Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.CAmath.MP MSC 34M5533E1741A6035Q15
keywords PainlevéIIequationtronquéesolutionsHamiltonianRiemann-HilbertproblemasymptoticexpansionBarnesG-functiontotalintegralsrandommatrixtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that two regularized integrals attached to the tronquée solutions of the Painlevé II equation, one for the solution $q$ and one for its Hamiltonian $H$, are convergent and independent of the cutoff $c$, for $\alpha > -1/2$ and $\omega \ge 0$. It then computes their full asymptotic expansions as $s$ tends to $+\infty$ and $-\infty$, with all constant terms expressed through the Gamma function, the Barnes $G$-function, $\zeta'(-1)$ and $\arg \Gamma$. The formulas specialize to the known total-integral results for the Hastings-McLeod and Ablowitz-Segur solutions, and the Hamiltonian integral recovers the constant in the large-gap expansion for a Gaussian unitary ensemble with an edge discontinuity. A sympathetic reader should care because explicit constants in such integrals are the difficult part of many random-matrix large-gap asymptotics, and the paper supplies them for a whole one-parameter family of Painlevé II solutions at once.

What carries the argument

The argument rides on a Riemann-Hilbert (RH) problem for the Painlevé XXXIV equation, whose solution $\Psi$ encodes the Hamiltonian $H$ and the tronquée solution $w$ through $\ln|(\Phi_0)_{11}|$. Large-$s$ asymptotics of $w$, $H$, $u$, and $\ln|(\Phi_0)_{11}|$ are obtained by nonlinear steepest descent with Airy, Bessel, and confluent hypergeometric parametrices. The proof then uses differential identities (2.19)-(2.21) to express derivatives of an auxiliary integral $I_3$ with respect to $\alpha$ and $\beta$ in terms of $I_1$, $u$, and $w$, and the bridge identities of Lemma 4.1, especially $I_2 = -\frac{1}{3}(uw+2sH+2\alpha^2+\alpha)+2\alpha I_1-I_3$, to pin down the integration constants.

What would settle it

One concrete check: evaluate $I_2(s;1/4,0)$ by direct quadrature of (1.33) at a large negative $s$, say $s=-100$, and compare the result with (1.34); a mismatch in the constant term $\ln(G(3/2)/(2\pi)^{1/4})-\zeta'(-1)+1/4-\ln 2/24$ larger than the stated $O(|s|^{-3/2})$ would refute Theorem 1.3. A special-case check is $I_2(s;0,1)=0$, which the formula with $\alpha=0$, $\beta=0$ predicts exactly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the regularized integrals $I_1(s;\alpha,\omega)$ of the tronquée solution and $I_2(s;\alpha,\omega)$ of the associated Hamiltonian are well defined and have explicit two-ended asymptotics. For $\omega=0$ the constants involve $\ln \Gamma(1+2\alpha)$ and $\ln(G(1+2\alpha)/(2\pi)^\alpha)$ respectively; for $\omega=e^{-2\beta\pi i}$ with $\beta i\in\mathbb{R}$, they involve $\arg\Gamma$, a cosine of the phase $\vartheta(s)$, and the combination $G(1+\alpha+\beta)G(1+\alpha-\beta)/G(1+2\alpha)$. Theorem 1.1 states expansions (1.20)-(1.21), and Theorem 1.3 states (1.34)-(1.35). The paper also shows the special cases agree with earlier results: $\alpha=-1/4$, $\omega=0$ recovers the Hastings-McLeod integral, and $\alpha=0$ recovers the large-gap constant in the perturbed-GUE setting.

Load-bearing premise

The proof differentiates the regularized integrals with respect to $\alpha$ and $\beta$ and integrates the resulting asymptotic relations over parameter intervals, but it does not explicitly prove that the error terms are uniform in those parameters on the ranges used.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Setting $\omega=0$ in (1.20) and $\alpha=-1/4$ reproduces the known total integral of the Hastings-McLeod solution, so the new formulas contain that classical result.
  • Setting $\alpha=0$ in (1.35) gives another proof of the large-gap expansion for the Gaussian weight with an edge discontinuity, including the constant $\ln G(1+\beta)G(1-\beta)-3\beta^2\ln 2$.
  • The Hamiltonian integral supplies the explicit constant $\ln(G(1+2\alpha)/(2\pi)^\alpha)$ that turns the paper's soft-to-hard edge phase-transition heuristic into a concrete statement about the transition of the gap probability.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the integration-over-parameters step that fixes the constants assumes the $O(|s|^{-3/2})$ error terms in Propositions 3.1-3.4 are uniform in $\alpha$ and $\beta$; the paper states the asymptotics pointwise in the parameters and would need a uniformity argument to fully justify (4.25).
  • Editorial inference: Remark 3.2 indicates the RH analysis extends to $\omega \in \mathbb{C}\setminus(-\infty,0)$, so the integral formulas probably extend to complex $\beta$ away from the negative axis, with the absolute values interpreted analytically.
  • Editorial inference: the Hamiltonian integral $I_2$ is closely tied to the logarithm of an isomonodromic tau function, so the Barnes-function constants found here are likely the explicit connection formulas for tau functions in this Painlevé II family.
  • Editorial inference: a direct numerical quadrature of (1.33) at $\alpha=1/4$, $\omega=0$ would test the constant term independently of the RH machinery.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a family of tronquée solutions of the Painlevé II equation with parameter ν=2α+1/2 and Stokes multipliers (1.14), for α>-1/2 and ω≥0. It defines regularized integrals I1 of the solution q and I2 of the associated Hamiltonian H, and establishes explicit asymptotic expansions as s→+∞ (Theorem 1.1) and as s→−∞ (Theorem 1.3), with all constant terms evaluated in terms of the Gamma function, Barnes G-function, the derivative of the Riemann zeta function, and arg Gamma. The method combines the Riemann-Hilbert analysis for the Painlevé XXXIV equation from earlier work of the authors and others with differential identities (Lemma 2.3 and Lemma 4.1) that relate the regularized integrals to the asymptotics of the Hamiltonian and related quantities. Special cases reproduce previously known results, including the Hastings-McLeod total integral (1.5), the α=0, ω=1 special solution, and the large-gap expansion of Bogatskiy-Claeys-Its.

Significance. If the proofs are completed, the paper gives the first explicit constant terms for the total integrals of this one-parameter family of tronquée Painlevé II solutions and their associated Hamiltonians. The algebraic identities in Lemma 4.1 are clean and checkable, and the agreement with the known special cases, including the Tracy-Widom constant c0 and the previously known α=0, ω=1 Hamiltonian integral, provides strong independent evidence that the final formulas are correct. The paper also indicates plausible applications to large-gap asymptotics in random matrix theory. However, the proof of Theorem 1.3 currently has a load-bearing gap concerning parameter uniformity, and one displayed identity in the derivation contains a factor error that needs correction.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.3, Eqs. (4.10)-(4.11), (4.14)-(4.15), (4.21)-(4.25)] The proof of Theorem 1.3 differentiates the regularized integrals with respect to α or β and then integrates asymptotic relations over parameter intervals. Propositions 3.1-3.4 state asymptotic estimates for fixed parameters only; no uniformity in α on compact subsets of (-1/2,∞) or in β on compact subsets of iR is stated for the O(|s|^{-3/2}) remainders, and the derivatives ∂αw and ∂βw that enter (4.5)-(4.6) are not among the quantities estimated in those propositions. This is not a harmless technicality: equation (4.15) is obtained by integrating (4.14) from 0 to α, and equations (4.22) and (4.25) integrate in β and α respectively. Without a uniformity statement (or an alternative argument controlling the integrated remainders), the passage from (4.14) to (4.15) and from (4.24) to (4.25) is not justified. This step fixes the constant terms in (1.34)-(1.35), so it is load-bearing.
  2. [§4.3, Eq. (4.23)] The first displayed identity for u(s)w_α(s) is incorrect as printed. Since (3.76) gives w=|s|^{1/2}tan B+O(s^{-1}) with B=θ/2+argΓ(1+α−β)−π/4, differentiation yields w_α=|s|^{1/2}sec^2B·dαB+...; combined with (3.75) this gives u w_α = 2|α−β| cos(A)/cos(B)·dαB + O(...), where A=θ/2+argΓ(α−β)+π/4. The printed formula has cos(A)cos(B) instead of cos(A)/cos(B). The following line, (2iβ−2α tanB)dαB, is consistent with the corrected quotient form when β is purely imaginary, so the error appears repairable, but the derivation of (4.25) must be corrected.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Theorems 1.1 and 1.3 and throughout] The condition written as 'βi ∈ R' is confusing and should be stated as iβ ∈ R or β ∈ iR.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract contains a typo: 'Painelv\'e' should be 'Painlev\'e'.
  3. [§3.4, proof of Proposition 3.4] In the sentence beginning 'The asymptotics of the tronquée solution w(s;2α+1/2,ω) in (3.61)...', the reference should be to (3.76), since (3.61) is the separate ω=0 case.
  4. [§4.2 and §4.3] The paper switches freely between I1 and the rescaled integral ~I1; a short sentence reminding the reader of the exact relation (4.3) when (4.12)-(4.13) are used in the proof of Theorem 1.1 would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the new constant-term evaluations are anchored by external results, and the self-citations supply independent Riemann-Hilbert asymptotics rather than restating the target integrals.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the sense required here. The integrals I1 and I2 are related to ln|(Phi_0)_11| and to the auxiliary integral I3 through differential identities (Lemma 2.2, Lemma 2.3, Lemma 4.1). The large-s asymptotics feeding into the proofs are quoted from prior published RH analyses [33, 39, 51]; [51] and [52] do involve co-author Xu, but those cited results are independent asymptotic analyses of the Painleve XXXIV RH problem, not restatements of the total-integral formulas being proved. The integration constants in Section 4.3 are fixed by genuinely external anchors: the Tracy-Widom constant c0 proved by Deift, Its and Krasovsky [15], and the exactly solvable case alpha=0, omega=1 for which H(s;0,1)=0 and q(s;1/2,1) is the Airy logarithmic derivative. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no target equation is assumed in the proof. The skeptic's concerns about possible non-uniformity of O(|s|^{-3/2}) error terms in alpha,beta and a suspected trig factor in (4.23) are legitimate correctness risks, but they are not instances of circularity: even if the proof needed repair, the claimed results would not reduce by construction to their inputs. Hence the circularity score is minimal.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities are needed. The quantities alpha and omega are family parameters, not fitted values. The derivation uses standard special functions and previously established Riemann-Hilbert asymptotics; the only unverified input is the explicit uniformity of those asymptotics with respect to alpha and beta during the integrations in Section 4.3.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Riemann-Hilbert characterization of Painleve II solutions via Stokes multipliers is a bijection.
    Used to define the tronquee family through the Stokes data (1.14) and to connect the solution to the RH problem for Psi; see Section 1.1 and equation (1.3).
  • domain assumption The RH problem for Psi has a unique solution for alpha > -1/2, omega >= 0 and all real s, and H is real and pole-free.
    Lemma 2.1 cites [51, Proposition 1] for existence; this is load-bearing for defining I2 without principal values.
  • domain assumption The large-s asymptotic expansions of u, w and H from [33, 39, 51] are valid with the stated error terms.
    Propositions 3.1, 3.3 and 3.4 quote these results; the final constants are obtained by integrating these asymptotics in the parameters alpha and beta.
  • standard math The Barnes G-function representation of the log-Gamma integral in DLMF 5.17.4 is valid for the parameter range used.
    Used in equation (4.18) to convert Gamma integrals into Barnes G functions when deriving (1.34) and (1.35).
  • standard math The Tracy-Widom constant c0 = ln(2)/24 + zeta'(-1) from Deift, Its and Krasovsky is exact.
    Used in (1.9) and (4.16) to fix the integration constant in I3(s;0,0), which anchors the alpha-dependence of the final formulas.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On integrals of the tronqu\'{e}e solutions and the associated Hamiltonians for the Painlev\'{e} II equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FVC4H25R

@misc{pith2026190801532,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On integrals of the tronqu\'ee solutions and the associated Hamiltonians for the Painlev\'e II equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FVC4H25R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01532}
}
abstract

We consider a family of tronqu\'{e}e solutions of the Painelv\'{e} II equation \begin{equation*} q''(s)=2q(s)^3+sq(s)-(2\alpha+\frac12), \qquad \alpha > -\frac12, \end{equation*} which is characterized by the Stokes multipliers $$s_1=-e^{-2\alpha \pi i },\quad s_2=\omega, \quad s_3=-e^{2 \alpha \pi i} $$ with $\omega$ being a free parameter. These solutions include the well-known generalized Hastings-McLeod solution as a special case if $\omega=0$. We derive asymptotics of integrals of the tronqu\'{e}e solutions and the associated Hamiltonians over the real axis for $\alpha > -1/2$ and $\omega \geq 0$, with the constant terms evaluated explicitly. Our results agree with those already known in the literature if the parameters $\alpha$ and $\omega$ are chosen to be special values. Some applications of our results in random matrix theory are also discussed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.01532 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The jump contours Σj and the regions Ωj , j = 1, 2, 3, 4 for the RH problem for Ψ. (b) Ψ(ζ) satisfies the jump condition Ψ+(ζ) = Ψ−(ζ)     1 ω 0 1 , ζ ∈ Σ1,  1 0 e 2απi 1  , ζ ∈ Σ2,  0 1 −1 0 , ζ ∈ Σ3,  1 0 e −2απi 1  , ζ ∈ Σ4. (2.1) (c) As ζ → ∞, there exists a function a(s) such that Ψ(ζ; s) =  1 0 ia(s) 1 I + Ψ1(s) ζ + O [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The regions in the z plane for Φ(Bes) α . By (3.38), it follows that h(ζ) 2 ∼ ζ, ζ → 0, and z = (−s) 3h(ζ) 2 ∈ II, ζ ∈ Ω2, where the region II is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The regions I − VIII in the z plane for Φ(CHF) α,β . Proof. Again, the asymptotics for the Painlev´e XXXIV transcendent u(s; 2α, ω) in (3.75) and the Hamiltonian H(s; 2α, ω) in (3.77) are given in Theorem 2 and Theorem 1 of [51], respectively. The asymptotics of the tronqu´ee solution w(s; 2α+ 1 2 , ω) in (3.61) is given in [39, Equations (19) and (28)]. The leading term in the expansion (3.61) can also be derived b… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The jump contours and regions for the RH problem for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The jump contours and regions for the RH problem for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The jump contours and regions for the RH problem for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ablowitz and H

    M.J. Ablowitz and H. Segur, Asymptotic solutions of the K orteweg-deVries equation, Stud. Appl. Math. , 57 (1976/77), 13–44

    work page 1976

  2. [2]

    Ablowitz and H

    M.J. Ablowitz and H. Segur, Exact linearization of a Pain lev´ e transcendent,Phys. Rev. Lett., 38 (1977), 1103–1106

    work page 1977

  3. [3]

    J. Baik, R. Buckingham and J. DiFranco, Asymptotics of Tr acy-Widom distributions and the total integral of a Painlev´ e II function, Comm. Math. Phys. , 280 (2008), 463–497

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    J. Baik, R. Buckingham, J. DiFranco and A.R. Its, Total in tegrals of global solutions to Painlev´ e II,Nonlinearity, 22 (2009), 1021–1061

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    Bogatskiy, T

    A. Bogatskiy, T. Claeys and A. Its, Hankel determinant an d orthogonal polynomials for a Gaussian weight with a discontinuity at the edge, Comm. Math. Phys. , 347 (2016), 127–162

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Bohigas, J

    O. Bohigas, J. X. de Carvalho and M. P. Pato, Deformations of the Tracy-Widom distri- bution, Phys. Rev. E , 79 (2009), 03117

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Bohigas and M

    O. Bohigas and M. Pato, Missing levels in correlated spec tra, Phys. Lett. B , 595 (2004), 171–176

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Bothner and R

    T. Bothner and R. Buckingham, Large deformations of the T racy-Widom distribution I: non-oscillatroy asymptotics, Comm. Math. Phys. , 359 (2018), 223–263

    work page 2018

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Bothner, A

    T. Bothner, A. Its and A. Prokhorov, The analysis of incom plete spectra in random matrix theory through an extension of the Jimbo-Miwa-Ueno different ial, Adv. Math., 345 (2019), 483–551

    2019

  2. [10]

    Boutroux, Recherches sur les transcendantes de M

    P. Boutroux, Recherches sur les transcendantes de M. Pa inlev´ e et l’´ etude asymptotique des ´ equations diff´ erentielles du second ordre,Ann. Sci. ´ ecole Norm. Sup. (3), 30 (1913), 255–375; 31 (1914), 99–159

    1913

  3. [11]

    Claeys and A.B.J

    T. Claeys and A.B.J. Kuijlaars, Universality in unitar y random matrix ensembles when the soft edge meets the hard edge, Integrable systems and random matrices , 265–279, Contemp. Math., 458, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2008

    2008

  4. [12]

    Claeys, A.B.J

    T. Claeys, A.B.J. Kuijlaars and M. Vanlessen, Multi-cr itical unitary random matrix en- sembles and the general Painlev´ e II equation, Ann. of Math. (2) , 168 (2008), 601–641

    2008

  5. [13]

    Dai and W.Y

    D. Dai and W.Y. Hu, Connection formulas for the Ablowitz -Segur solutions of the inho- mogeneous Painlev´ e II equation,Nonlinearity, 30 (2017), 2982–3009

    2017

  6. [14]

    Deift, Orthogonal Polynomials and Random Matrices: A Riemann-Hil bert Approach, Courant Lecture Notes 3, New York University, 1999

    P. Deift, Orthogonal Polynomials and Random Matrices: A Riemann-Hil bert Approach, Courant Lecture Notes 3, New York University, 1999

    1999

  7. [15]

    Deift, A

    P. Deift, A. Its and I. Krasovsky, Asymptotics of the Air y-kernel determinant, Comm. Math. Phys. , 278 (2008), 643–678

    2008

  8. [16]

    Deift, A

    P. Deift, A. Its and I. Krasovsky, Asymptotics of Toepli tz, Hankel, and Toeplitz+Hankel determinants with Fisher-Hartwig singularities, Ann. of Math. (2) , 174 (2011), 1243–1299

    2011

  9. [17]

    Deift, I

    P. Deift, I. Krasovsky and J. Vasilevska, Asymptotics f or a determinant with a confluent hypergeometric kernel, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , 2011 (2011), 2117–2160. 39

    2011

  10. [18]

    Deift and X

    P. Deift and X. Zhou, Asymptotics for the Painlev´ e II eq uation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 48 (1995), 277–337

    1995

  11. [19]

    Ehrhardt, Dyson’s constant in the asymptotics of the Fredholm determinant of the sine kernel, Comm

    T. Ehrhardt, Dyson’s constant in the asymptotics of the Fredholm determinant of the sine kernel, Comm. Math. Phys. , 262 (2006), 317–341

    2006

  12. [20]

    Ehrhardt, The asymptotics of a Bessel-kernel determ inant which arises in random matrix theory, Adv

    T. Ehrhardt, The asymptotics of a Bessel-kernel determ inant which arises in random matrix theory, Adv. Math. , 225 (2010), 3088–3133

    2010

  13. [21]

    Flaschka and A.C

    H. Flaschka and A.C. Newell, Monodromy- and spectrum-p reserving deformations I, Comm. Math. Phys. , 76 (1980), 65–116

    1980

  14. [22]

    Fokas, A.R

    A.S. Fokas, A.R. Its and A.V. Kitaev, The isomonodromy a pproach to matrix models in 2D quantum gravity, Comm. Math. Phys. , 147 (1992), 395–430

    1992

  15. [23]

    Fokas, A.R

    A.S. Fokas, A.R. Its, A.A. Kapaev and V.Y. Novokshenov, Painlev´ e Transcendents: The Riemann-Hilbert Approach, Math. Surv. Monog., vol. 128, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence , RI, 2006

    2006

  16. [24]

    Forrester, Log-gases and Random Matrices, London Mathematical Society Monographs Series, 34., Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 20 10

    P.J. Forrester, Log-gases and Random Matrices, London Mathematical Society Monographs Series, 34., Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 20 10

  17. [25]

    Forrester and N.S

    P.J. Forrester and N.S. Witte, Application of the τ-function theory of Painlev´ e equations to random matrices: PIV, PII and the GUE, Comm. Math. Phys. , 219 (2001), 357–398

    2001

  18. [26]

    Forrester and N.S

    P.J. Forrester and N.S. Witte, Painlev´ e II in random ma trix theory and related fields, Constr. Approx., 41 (2015), 589–613

    2015

  19. [27]

    Gromak, I

    V.I. Gromak, I. Laine and S. Shimomura, Painlev´ e Differential Equations in the Complex Plane, de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, 28. Walter de Gruyter & C o., Berlin, 2002

    2002

  20. [28]

    Hastings and J.B

    S.P. Hastings and J.B. McLeod, A boundary value problem associated with the second Painlev´ e transcendent and the Korteweg-de Vries equation , Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , 73 (1980), 31–51

    1980

  21. [29]

    Ince, Ordinary Differential Equations , Dover Publications, New York, 1944

    E.L. Ince, Ordinary Differential Equations , Dover Publications, New York, 1944

    1944

  22. [30]

    Iorgov, O

    N. Iorgov, O. Lisovyy and Y. Tykhyy, Painlev´ e VI connec tion problem and monodromy of c = 1 conformal blocks, J. High Energy Phys. , 12 (2013), 029

    2013

  23. [31]

    Its and I

    A. Its and I. Krasovsky, Hankel determinant and orthogo nal polynomials for the Gaussian weight with a jump, Integrable Systems and Random Matrices (Contemporary Mathem atics vol 458) , ed. J. Baik et al (Providence RI: American Mathematical Soc iety), (2008), 215– 248

    2008

  24. [32]

    Its, A.B.J

    A.R. Its, A.B.J. Kuijlaars and J. ¨Ostensson, Critical edge behavior in unitary random matrix ensembles and the thirty fourth Painlev´ e transcendent, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , 2008 (2008), Art. ID rnn017, 67 pp

    2008

  25. [33]

    Its, A.B.J

    A.R. Its, A.B.J. Kuijlaars and J. ¨Ostensson, Asymptotics for a special solution of the thirty fourth Painlev´ e equation,Nonlinearity, 22 (2009), 1523–1558

    2009

  26. [34]

    A.R. Its, O. Lisovyy and A. Prokhorov, Monodromy depend ence and connection formulae for isomonodromic tau functions, Duke Math. J. , 167 (2018), 1347–1432. 40

    2018

  27. [35]

    A.R. Its, O. Lisovyy and Y. Tykhyy, Connection problem f or the sine-Gordon/Painlev´ e III tau function and irregular conformal blocks, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , 2015 (2015), 8903–8924

    2015

  28. [36]

    Its and A

    A.R. Its and A. Prokhorov, Connection problem for the ta u-function of the sine-Gordon reduction of Painlev´ e III equation via the Riemann-Hilbert approach, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, 2016 (2016), 6856–6883

    2016

  29. [37]

    Its and A

    A.R. Its and A. Prokhorov, On some Hamiltonian properti es of the isomonodromic tau functions, Rev. Math. Phys. , 30 (2018), 1840008, 38 pp

    2018

  30. [38]

    Jimbo, T

    M. Jimbo, T. Miwa and K. Ueno, Monodromy preserving defo rmation of linear ordinary differential equations with rational coefficients: I. General theory and τ-function, Phys. D , 2 (1981), 306–352

    1981

  31. [39]

    Kapaev, Global asymptotics of the second Painlev´ e transcendent, Phys

    A.A. Kapaev, Global asymptotics of the second Painlev´ e transcendent, Phys. Lett. A , 167 (1992), 356–62

    1992

  32. [40]

    Kapaev, Quasi-linear Stokes phenomenon for the Ha stings-McLeod solution of the second Painlev´ e equation, preprint arXiv:nlin.SI/0411009

    A.A. Kapaev, Quasi-linear Stokes phenomenon for the Ha stings-McLeod solution of the second Painlev´ e equation, preprint arXiv:nlin.SI/0411009

  33. [41]

    Kokocki, Total integrals of solutions for the Painle v´ e II equation and singluarity forma- tion in the vortex patch dynamics, preprint arXiv:1808.090 39

    P. Kokocki, Total integrals of solutions for the Painle v´ e II equation and singluarity forma- tion in the vortex patch dynamics, preprint arXiv:1808.090 39

  34. [42]

    Kuijlaars, K

    A.B.J. Kuijlaars, K. T-R. McLaughlin, W. Van Assche and M. Vanlessen, The Riemann- Hilbert approach to strong asymptotics for orthogonal poly nomials on [ −1, 1], Adv. Math., 188 (2004), 337–398

    2004

  35. [43]

    Mehta, Random Matrices, 3rd ed., Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2004

    M.L. Mehta, Random Matrices, 3rd ed., Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2004

    2004

  36. [44]

    Miller, On the increasing tritronqu´ ee solutions of the Painlev´ e-II equation, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom

    P.D. Miller, On the increasing tritronqu´ ee solutions of the Painlev´ e-II equation, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. , 14 (2018), Paper No. 125, 38 pp

    2018

  37. [45]

    Olver, A.B

    F.W.J. Olver, A.B. Olde Daalhuis, D.W. Lozier, B.I. Sch neider, R.F. Boisvert, C.W. Clark, B.R. Miller and B.V. Saunders, eds, NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions , http://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.0.21 of 2018-12-15

    2018

  38. [46]

    Segur and M

    H. Segur and M. Ablowitz, Asymptotic solutions of nonli near evolution equations and a Painlev´ e transcendent,Phys. D , 3 (1981), 165–84

    1981

  39. [47]

    Tracy, Asymptotics of the τ-function arising in the two-dimensional Ising model, Comm

    C.A. Tracy, Asymptotics of the τ-function arising in the two-dimensional Ising model, Comm. Math. Phys. , 142 (1991), 297–311

    1991

  40. [48]

    Tracy and H

    C. Tracy and H. Widom, Level spacing distributions and t he Airy kernel, Comm. Math. Phys., 159 (1994), 151–174

    1994

  41. [49]

    Tracy and H

    C. Tracy and H. Widom, Level spacing distributions and t he Bessel kernel, Comm. Math. Phys., 161 (1994), 289–309

    1994

  42. [50]

    Tracy and H

    C. Tracy and H. Widom, On orthogonal and symplectic matr ix ensembles, Comm. Math. Phys., 177 (1996), 727–754

    1996

  43. [51]

    Wu, S.-X

    X.-B. Wu, S.-X. Xu and Y.-Q. Zhao, Gaussian unitary ense mble with boundary spectrum singularity and σ -form of Painlev´ e II,Stud. Appl. Math. , 140 (2018), 221–251

    2018

  44. [52]

    Xu and D

    S.-X. Xu and D. Dai, Tracy-Widom distributions in criti cal unitary random matrix ensem- bles and the coupled Painlev´ e II system, Comm. Math. Phys. , 365 (2019), 515–567. 41

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.