pith. sign in

arxiv: 2407.06138 · v3 · pith:FWLSWZSTnew · submitted 2024-07-08 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Laser-scanning of induction-melted Al alloys: are they representative of additively manufactured ones?

Zhaoxuan Ge , Sebastian Calderon , S. Mohadeseh Taheri-Mousavi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 22:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords additive manufacturinglaser powder bed fusionlaser scanningAl alloysmicrostructure characterizationrapid solidificationalloy design
0
0 comments X

The pith

Laser scanning of induction-melted Al alloys yields microstructures similar to LPBF at SEM and TEM scales.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests an expedited workflow that laser-scans induction-melted Al-Ni-Zr-Er samples to replicate the rapid solidification of laser powder bed fusion without needing custom powders. Multi-scale imaging shows matching grain morphology, size, precipitates, and phase distribution despite visibly different melt pool shapes. Mechanical tests reveal the scanned samples are about 20 percent softer, linked to thermal history variations. The same hardness drop appears in a benchmark alloy with roughly 10 percent absolute difference. This positions the method as a faster screen for alloy compositions in additive manufacturing.

Core claim

Multipath laser scanning of induction-melted samples produces microstructures that match those of LPBF samples at SEM and TEM scales in morphology, grain size, precipitate presence, and phase distribution, even though melt pool geometries differ and microhardness is 20 percent lower due to thermal history and possible phase fraction differences.

What carries the argument

Multipath laser scanning of induction-melted bulk samples as a proxy process for LPBF rapid solidification conditions.

If this is right

  • Alloy design iterations for powder-based AM can skip customized powder production and rely on induction-melted stock instead.
  • Microstructural screening at SEM and TEM scales becomes a practical down-selection step before full LPBF trials.
  • The observed 20 percent hardness offset must be accounted for when using scanned samples to predict mechanical performance.
  • The 10 percent error in the benchmark alloy suggests the workflow can extend to other compositions with modest calibration.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If scan parameters can be tuned to close the hardness gap, the workflow could serve as a standard low-cost screening stage for broader alloy families.
  • The method may connect to computational thermodynamics tools to predict which compositions are worth scanning next.
  • Testing whether the microstructural match persists under different laser powers or scan speeds would clarify the range of usable parameters.

Load-bearing premise

Similarity in grain size, precipitates, and phase distribution at SEM and TEM scales is enough to treat the laser-scanned samples as representative of LPBF even when hardness differs by 20 percent.

What would settle it

A side-by-side LPBF build of an alloy first screened by laser scanning that shows markedly different precipitate volume fractions or mechanical response not predicted by the scanned microstructures.

read the original abstract

The bottleneck of alloy design for powder-based additive manufacturing (AM) resides in customized powder production - an expensive and time-consuming process hindering the rapid closed-loop design iterations. This study analyzed an expedited experimental workflow, i.e., multipath laser scanning of induction-melted samples, to mimic rapid solidification of AM to serve as an alternative approach to down-select from the design space. Using Al-Ni-Zr-Er model alloy, comprehensive multi-scale characterizations were performed to compare microstructural features between laser-scanned and laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) samples. Although demonstrating a difference in melt pool geometries, the microstructures in scanning electron microscopy (SEM)- and transmission electron microscopy (TEM)- scale demonstrate a high degree of similarity, in terms of microstructure morphology, grain size, presence of precipitates, and phase distribution. The mechanical performance was evaluated by microhardness tests. The results revealed a 20% reduction in laser-scanned samples compared to LPBF samples, attributed to the thermal history and potential differences in phase fractions. The decreasing trend was also observed in the benchmark alloy showing a 10% absolute error with respect to the model alloy. This study underscores the potential of this workflow to accelerate alloy design in AM by circumventing customized powder production and encourages further exploration across diverse materials and processing parameters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript evaluates multipath laser scanning of induction-melted Al-Ni-Zr-Er samples as a faster proxy workflow for LPBF alloy design that avoids custom powder production. It reports differences in melt-pool geometry but claims high similarity at SEM/TEM scales in morphology, grain size, precipitate presence, and phase distribution; microhardness is 20% lower in the laser-scanned material (and ~10% offset in a benchmark alloy), attributed to differing thermal histories and possible phase-fraction variations.

Significance. If the microstructural equivalence can be shown to extend to performance-relevant metrics despite the hardness offset, the workflow would meaningfully accelerate closed-loop alloy screening for additive manufacturing by removing the powder-production bottleneck.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that SEM/TEM-scale similarities establish the laser-scanning route as a 'representative proxy' for LPBF alloy design is undercut by the reported 20% hardness reduction (and the explicit attribution to 'potential differences in phase fractions'), because phase fractions and sub-TEM features are precisely the quantities that would need to be equivalent for the proxy to support performance-based down-selection.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract/Results: no sample sizes, error bars, or statistical treatment of the grain-size, precipitate, or hardness measurements are described, preventing assessment of whether the asserted 'high degree of similarity' is robust or could be affected by post-hoc selection or measurement variability.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a concise statement of the specific processing parameters (laser power, scan speed, hatch spacing) used for both the laser-scanned and LPBF specimens to allow direct comparison.
  2. [Abstract] Notation for the model alloy composition (Al-Ni-Zr-Er) should be given with nominal weight or atomic percentages on first use.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We provide point-by-point responses to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that SEM/TEM-scale similarities establish the laser-scanning route as a 'representative proxy' for LPBF alloy design is undercut by the reported 20% hardness reduction (and the explicit attribution to 'potential differences in phase fractions'), because phase fractions and sub-TEM features are precisely the quantities that would need to be equivalent for the proxy to support performance-based down-selection.

    Authors: The manuscript reports the hardness difference explicitly and attributes it to differing thermal histories and possible phase fraction variations, which aligns with the referee's concern. We position the laser-scanning method as a proxy for microstructural features observable at SEM and TEM scales to enable faster screening, with the understanding that full performance validation would require LPBF samples. To address this, we will revise the abstract to more precisely state the scope of the proxy (microstructural similarity for initial down-selection) and note the limitations regarding mechanical properties. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract/Results: no sample sizes, error bars, or statistical treatment of the grain-size, precipitate, or hardness measurements are described, preventing assessment of whether the asserted 'high degree of similarity' is robust or could be affected by post-hoc selection or measurement variability.

    Authors: We agree that the lack of statistical details in the abstract and results section limits the assessment of robustness. In the revised version, we will include the number of measurements (e.g., grains analyzed for size, precipitates observed, hardness indents per sample), report standard deviations or error bars, and provide statistical comparisons where appropriate to support the claims of similarity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct experimental comparison without derivations or load-bearing self-citations

full rationale

The manuscript is a purely experimental study comparing laser-scanned induction-melted Al-Ni-Zr-Er samples to LPBF samples via SEM, TEM, and microhardness measurements. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or mathematical derivations appear in the text. The central claim of microstructural similarity at SEM/TEM scales is supported by direct characterization data rather than any reduction to prior self-citations or ansatzes. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for any uniqueness theorem or forced choice. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks (observed microstructures and hardness values), consistent with the reader's assessment of score 0.0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard materials-science assumptions about what microstructural metrics predict process representativeness; no free parameters, invented entities or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Microstructural features observed at SEM and TEM scales are the primary indicators of whether two rapid-solidification processes produce comparable material for alloy design purposes.
    Invoked when the authors conclude similarity despite differing melt-pool geometry and hardness.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5782 in / 1316 out tokens · 17940 ms · 2026-05-23T22:55:32.232663+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    However, our current understanding of the underlying physics of AM is still limited due to the complicated thermal history and various heat transfers

    Introduction: AM has major advantages of shortening supply chains for market distribution and realization of intricate geometric components. However, our current understanding of the underlying physics of AM is still limited due to the complicated thermal history and various heat transfers. Thus, the community still predominantly focuses on replicating re...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The alloy was designed for high-temperature (250℃) applications

    Material system In this study, an Al-2.73Ni-3.19Zr-2.34Er wt% model alloy, designed in our earlier study is used [13]. The alloy was designed for high-temperature (250℃) applications. It showcases a great coarsening resistance demonstrating stable yield strength and microstructure after aging 48 hours at an elevated temperature of 400℃. The yield strength...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The particle size was characterized using the laser diffraction method, revealing a distribution with d10 = 44.5%, d50 = 63.8%, and d90 = 91.5%

    Experiment Method 3.1 3D-printed sample preparation The powder was generated by AMAZEMENT company through ultrasonic atomization using the AUS500 system of Indutherm Bluepower. The particle size was characterized using the laser diffraction method, revealing a distribution with d10 = 44.5%, d50 = 63.8%, and d90 = 91.5%. The chemical composition of the pow...

    work page

  4. [4]

    shuffling

    Results and discussion The optical images of the melt pool geometries of three samples —3D-printed, LS#1, and LS#2—are presented in Fig. 1. Each layer in the 3D-printed sample experienced a complex thermal history, as successive layers of powder were subjected to multiple heating cycles at varying angles due to the rotation of the laser beam. Moreover, lo...

    work page

  5. [5]

    A portion of this research

    Conclusion To address the constrained availability of customized powder in the field of AM alloy design, this paper studied Al-Ni-Zr-Er as a model alloy and investigated how much laser-scanned induction melted samples, which is a rapid experimental workflow and aiming at mimicking rapid solidification of AM, can be representative of LPBF sample. Multi-sca...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Effects of Alloy Composition and Solid-State Diffusion Kinetics on Powder Bed Fusion Cracking Susceptibility,

    H. Hyer, L. Zhou, A. Mehta, and Y . Sohn, “Effects of Alloy Composition and Solid-State Diffusion Kinetics on Powder Bed Fusion Cracking Susceptibility, ” J Phase Equilibria Diffus, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 5–13, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11669-020-00844-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s11669-020-00844-y 2021

  7. [7]

    Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–12Si produced by selective laser melting: Effect of heat treatment,

    K. G. Prashanth et al., “Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–12Si produced by selective laser melting: Effect of heat treatment, ” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 590, pp. 153–160, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.10.023

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2013.10.023 2014

  8. [8]

    Novel Al-X alloys with improved hardness,

    C. J. Hung et al., “Novel Al-X alloys with improved hardness, ” Mater Des, vol. 192, p. 108699, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108699

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108699 2020

  9. [9]

    Anomalous strengthening by supersaturated solid solutions of selectively laser melted Al–Si-based alloys,

    N. Takata, M. Liu, H. Kodaira, A. Suzuki, and M. Kobashi, “Anomalous strengthening by supersaturated solid solutions of selectively laser melted Al–Si-based alloys, ” Addit Manuf, vol. 33, p. 101152, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101152

    work page doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101152 2020

  10. [10]

    Formation of metastable cellular microstructures in selective laser melted alloys,

    K. G. Prashanth and J. Eckert, “Formation of metastable cellular microstructures in selective laser melted alloys, ” J Alloys Compd, vol. 707, pp. 27–34, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.209

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.209 2017

  11. [11]

    A selective laser melting and solution heat treatment refined Al–12Si alloy with a controllable ultrafine eutectic microstructure and 25% tensile ductility,

    X. P . Li et al., “A selective laser melting and solution heat treatment refined Al–12Si alloy with a controllable ultrafine eutectic microstructure and 25% tensile ductility, ” Acta Mater, vol. 95, pp. 74–82, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.05.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.05.017 2015

  12. [12]

    Microstructure and strength of selectively laser melted AlSi10Mg,

    J. Wu, X. Q. Wang, W. Wang, M. M. Attallah, and M. H. Loretto, “Microstructure and strength of selectively laser melted AlSi10Mg, ” Acta Mater, vol. 117, pp. 311–320, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.012 2016

  13. [13]

    Microstructure and mechanical properties of as-processed scandium-modified aluminium using selective laser melting,

    A. B. Spierings, K. Dawson, M. Voegtlin, F . Palm, and P . J. Uggowitzer, “Microstructure and mechanical properties of as-processed scandium-modified aluminium using selective laser melting, ” CIRP Annals, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 213–216, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.057

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.057 2016

  14. [14]

    Evaluation of an Al-Ce alloy for laser additive manufacturing,

    A. Plotkowski et al., “Evaluation of an Al-Ce alloy for laser additive manufacturing, ” Acta Mater, vol. 126, pp. 507–519, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.065

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.065 2017

  15. [15]

    Towards high- temperature applications of aluminium alloys enabled by additive manufacturing,

    R. A. Michi, A. Plotkowski, A. Shyam, R. R. Dehoff, and S. S. Babu, “Towards high- temperature applications of aluminium alloys enabled by additive manufacturing, ” 2022, Taylor and Francis Ltd. doi: 10.1080/09506608.2021.1951580

    work page doi:10.1080/09506608.2021.1951580 2022

  16. [16]

    Multicomponent aluminum alloys for applications such as additive manufacturing,

    J. Gong, G. B. Olson, D. R. Snyder, and T. S. Kozmel II, “Multicomponent aluminum alloys for applications such as additive manufacturing, ” PCT/US2018/062761, 2019

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Methodologies for formulating compositions, including aluminum alloys with high-temperature strength,

    S. Mohadeseh Taheri-Mousavi, Anastasios Hart, and Greg Olson, “Methodologies for formulating compositions, including aluminum alloys with high-temperature strength, ” WO 2024/092273 A2, 2024

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Additively manufacturable high-strength aluminum alloys with thermally stable microstructures enabled by hybrid machine learning-based design,

    S. Mohadeseh Taheri-Mousavi et al., “Additively manufacturable high-strength aluminum alloys with thermally stable microstructures enabled by hybrid machine learning-based design, ” ArXiv, 2024

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Alloy design via additive manufacturing: Advantages, challenges, applications and perspectives,

    A. Bandyopadhyay, K. D. Traxel, M. Lang, M. Juhasz, N. Eliaz, and S. Bose, “Alloy design via additive manufacturing: Advantages, challenges, applications and perspectives, ” Jan. 01, 2022, Elsevier B. V . doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2021.11.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2021.11.026 2022

  20. [20]

    Phase selection motifs in High Entropy Alloys revealed through combinatorial methods: Large atomic size difference favors BCC over FCC,

    S. A. Kube, S. Sohn, D. Uhl, A. Datye, A. Mehta, and J. Schroers, “Phase selection motifs in High Entropy Alloys revealed through combinatorial methods: Large atomic size difference favors BCC over FCC, ” Acta Mater, vol. 166, pp. 677–686, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.01.023

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2019.01.023 2019

  21. [21]

    Functionally graded material of 304L stainless steel and inconel 625 fabricated by directed energy deposition: Characterization and thermodynamic modeling,

    B. E. Carroll et al., “Functionally graded material of 304L stainless steel and inconel 625 fabricated by directed energy deposition: Characterization and thermodynamic modeling, ” Acta Mater, vol. 108, pp. 46–54, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.019 2016

  22. [22]

    Critical review of the state of the art in multi-material fabrication via directed energy deposition,

    D. R. Feenstra, R. Banerjee, H. L. Fraser, A. Huang, A. Molotnikov, and N. Birbilis, “Critical review of the state of the art in multi-material fabrication via directed energy deposition, ” Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci, vol. 25, no. 4, p. 100924, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cossms.2021.100924

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cossms.2021.100924 2021

  23. [23]

    Opportunities and challenges in additive manufacturing of functionally graded metallic materials via powder-fed laser directed energy deposition: A review,

    M. Ansari, E. Jabari, and E. Toyserkani, “Opportunities and challenges in additive manufacturing of functionally graded metallic materials via powder-fed laser directed energy deposition: A review, ” J Mater Process Technol, vol. 294, p. 117117, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117117

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117117 2021

  24. [24]

    W. Li et al., “Comprehensive studies of SS316L/IN718 functionally gradient material fabricated with directed energy deposition: Multi-physics & multi-materials modelling and experimental validation, ” Addit Manuf, vol. 61, p. 103358, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.ADDMA.2022.103358

    work page doi:10.1016/j.addma.2022.103358 2023

  25. [25]

    Impact of compositional gradients on selectivity of dissolvable support structures for directed energy deposited metals,

    C. S. Lefky, B. Zucker, A. R. Nassar, T. W. Simpson, and O. J. Hildreth, “Impact of compositional gradients on selectivity of dissolvable support structures for directed energy deposited metals, ” Acta Mater, vol. 153, pp. 1–7, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2018.04.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.009 2018

  26. [26]

    Molten pool swing in printing the steel/inconel functionally gradient material with laser-based Directed Energy Deposition,

    R. Zhang, N. Bian, H. Lu, Y . Li, Y . Tian, and W. Li, “Molten pool swing in printing the steel/inconel functionally gradient material with laser-based Directed Energy Deposition, ” Manuf Lett, vol. 32, pp. 44–48, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.MFGLET.2022.03.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mfglet.2022.03.002 2022

  27. [27]

    Direct Ink Writing: A 3D Printing Technology for Diverse Materials,

    M. A. S. R. Saadi et al., “Direct Ink Writing: A 3D Printing Technology for Diverse Materials, ” Advanced Materials, vol. 34, no. 28, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1002/adma.202108855

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202108855 2022

  28. [28]

    Melt Pool and Single Track Formation in Selective Laser Sintering/Selective Laser Melting,

    M. R. Alkahari, T. Furumoto, T. Ueda, and A. Hosokawa, “Melt Pool and Single Track Formation in Selective Laser Sintering/Selective Laser Melting, ” Adv Mat Res, vol. 933, pp. 196–201, May 2014, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.933.196

    work page doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.933.196 2014

  29. [29]

    Effect of surface morphology on the melt pool geometry in single track selective laser melting,

    A. K. Mishra and A. Kumar, “Effect of surface morphology on the melt pool geometry in single track selective laser melting, ” Mater Today Proc, vol. 27, pp. 816–823, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2019.12.357

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.357 2020

  30. [30]

    Single-Track Melt-Pool Measurements and Microstructures in Inconel 625,

    S. Ghosh et al., “Single-Track Melt-Pool Measurements and Microstructures in Inconel 625, ” JOM, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1011–1016, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11837-018-2771-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s11837-018-2771-x 2018

  31. [31]

    Single track scanning experiment in laser powder bed fusion process,

    S. Shrestha and K. Chou, “Single track scanning experiment in laser powder bed fusion process, ” Procedia Manuf, vol. 26, pp. 857–864, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.PROMFG.2018.07.110

    work page doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.110 2018

  32. [32]

    A numerical investigation on the physical mechanisms of single track defects in selective laser melting,

    C. Tang, J. L. Tan, and C. H. Wong, “A numerical investigation on the physical mechanisms of single track defects in selective laser melting, ” Int J Heat Mass Transf, vol. 126, pp. 957–968, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.IJHEATMASSTRANSFER.2018.06.073

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.06.073 2018

  33. [33]

    Measurement of the Melt Pool Length During Single Scan Tracks in a Commercial Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process,

    J. C. Heigel and B. M. Lane, “Measurement of the Melt Pool Length During Single Scan Tracks in a Commercial Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process, ” J Manuf Sci Eng, vol. 140, no. 5, May 2018, doi: 10.1115/1.4037571

    work page doi:10.1115/1.4037571 2018

  34. [34]

    Single track formation in selective laser melting of metal powders,

    I. Yadroitsev, A. Gusarov, I. Yadroitsava, and I. Smurov, “Single track formation in selective laser melting of metal powders, ” J Mater Process Technol, vol. 210, no. 12, pp. 1624–1631, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2010.05.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.05.010 2010

  35. [35]

    P . B. Hirsch and F . J. Humphreys, Plastic deformation of two-phase alloys containing small nondeformable particles. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1969

    work page 1969

  36. [36]

    New York: Wiley- VCH, 1997

    Eckhard Nembach, Particle Strengthening of Metals and Alloys, 1st ed. New York: Wiley- VCH, 1997

    work page 1997

  37. [37]

    Dictionary Indexing of Electron Back-Scatter Diffraction Patterns: a Hands-On Tutorial,

    M. A. Jackson, E. Pascal, and M. De Graef, “Dictionary Indexing of Electron Back-Scatter Diffraction Patterns: a Hands-On Tutorial, ” Integr Mater Manuf Innov, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 226– 246, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s40192-019-00137-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s40192-019-00137-4 2019

  38. [38]

    Revolving scanning transmission electron microscopy: Correcting sample drift distortion without prior knowledge,

    X. Sang and J. M. LeBeau, “Revolving scanning transmission electron microscopy: Correcting sample drift distortion without prior knowledge, ” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 138, pp. 28–35, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.12.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.12.004 2014

  39. [39]

    Non-rigid registration and non-local principle component analysis to improve electron microscopy spectrum images,

    A. B. Yankovich et al., “Non-rigid registration and non-local principle component analysis to improve electron microscopy spectrum images, ” Nanotechnology, vol. 27, no. 36, p. 364001, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/36/364001

    work page doi:10.1088/0957-4484/27/36/364001 2016

  40. [40]

    Denudation of metal powder layers in laser powder bed fusion processes,

    M. J. Matthews, G. Guss, S. A. Khairallah, A. M. Rubenchik, P . J. Depond, and W. E. King, “Denudation of metal powder layers in laser powder bed fusion processes, ” Acta Mater, vol. 114, pp. 33–42, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.017 2016

  41. [41]

    Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: Physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation zones,

    S. A. Khairallah, A. T. Anderson, A. Rubenchik, and W. E. King, “Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: Physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation zones, ” Acta Mater, vol. 108, pp. 36–45, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014 2016

  42. [42]

    Fluid and particle dynamics in laser powder bed fusion,

    P . Bidare, I. Bitharas, R. M. Ward, M. M. Attallah, and A. J. Moore, “Fluid and particle dynamics in laser powder bed fusion, ” Acta Mater, vol. 142, pp. 107–120, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.051

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.051 2018

  43. [43]

    Elucidating the effect of preheating temperature on melt pool morphology variation in Inconel 718 laser powder bed fusion via simulation and experiment,

    Q. Chen et al., “Elucidating the effect of preheating temperature on melt pool morphology variation in Inconel 718 laser powder bed fusion via simulation and experiment, ” Addit Manuf, vol. 37, p. 101642, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101642

    work page doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101642 2021

  44. [44]

    Powder Spreading and Tribocharging for Additive Manufacturing Process,

    Basel Alchikh-Sulaiman, Paul Carriere, Xin Chu, Liu Yang, and Stephen Yue, “Powder Spreading and Tribocharging for Additive Manufacturing Process, ” McGill University, 2019

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Elsevier, 1992

    Kenneth Easterling, Introduction to the Physical Metallurgy of Welding. Elsevier, 1992. doi: 10.1016/C2013-0-04524-0

    work page doi:10.1016/c2013-0-04524-0 1992

  46. [46]

    W. Kurz, D. J. Fisher, and M. Rappaz, Fundamentals of Solidification 5th Edition, vol. 103. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2023. doi: 10.4028/b-v7b35q

    work page doi:10.4028/b-v7b35q 2023

  47. [47]

    Effect of laser scanning speed on the microstructure, phase transformation and mechanical property of NiTi alloys fabricated by LPBF ,

    W. Guo et al., “Effect of laser scanning speed on the microstructure, phase transformation and mechanical property of NiTi alloys fabricated by LPBF , ” Mater Des, vol. 215, p. 110460, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110460

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110460 2022

  48. [48]

    Effect of scanning speed on microstructure and mechanical properties of as-printed Ti–22Al–25Nb intermetallic by laser powder bed fusion,

    Q. Chen, L. Xu, L. Zhao, K. Hao, and Y . Han, “Effect of scanning speed on microstructure and mechanical properties of as-printed Ti–22Al–25Nb intermetallic by laser powder bed fusion, ” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 885, p. 145652, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2023.145652

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2023.145652 2023

  49. [49]

    Structure and growth of core–shell nanoprecipitates in Al–Er–Sc–Zr–V–Si high-temperature alloys,

    W. Nasim et al., “Structure and growth of core–shell nanoprecipitates in Al–Er–Sc–Zr–V–Si high-temperature alloys, ” J Mater Sci, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 1857–1871, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10853-018-2941-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s10853-018-2941-9 2019

  50. [50]

    Ambient- and high-temperature mechanical properties of isochronally aged Al-0.06Sc, Al-0.06Zr and Al-0.06Sc-0.06Zr (at.%) alloys,

    K. E. Knipling, D. N. Seidman, and D. C. Dunand, “Ambient- and high-temperature mechanical properties of isochronally aged Al-0.06Sc, Al-0.06Zr and Al-0.06Sc-0.06Zr (at.%) alloys, ” Acta Mater, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 943–954, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.017 2011

  51. [51]

    Precipitation of L1 2 -phase nano-particles in dilute Al-Er-Zr alloys from the first-principles,

    C. Zhang, D. Yin, Y . Jiang, and Y . Wang, “Precipitation of L1 2 -phase nano-particles in dilute Al-Er-Zr alloys from the first-principles, ” Comput Mater Sci, vol. 162, pp. 171–177, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.03.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.03.001 2019

  52. [52]

    Mechanical properties of Al(Sc,Zr) alloys at ambient and elevated temperatures,

    C. B. Fuller, D. N. Seidman, and D. C. Dunand, “Mechanical properties of Al(Sc,Zr) alloys at ambient and elevated temperatures, ” Acta Mater, vol. 51, no. 16, pp. 4803–4814, Sep. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00320-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s1359-6454(03)00320-3 2003

  53. [53]

    Role of silicon in accelerating the nucleation of Al3(Sc,Zr) precipitates in dilute Al–Sc–Zr alloys,

    C. Booth-Morrison, Z. Mao, M. Diaz, D. C. Dunand, C. Wolverton, and D. N. Seidman, “Role of silicon in accelerating the nucleation of Al3(Sc,Zr) precipitates in dilute Al–Sc–Zr alloys, ” Acta Mater, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 4740–4752, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.05.036

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.05.036 2012

  54. [54]

    Effect of vanadium micro-alloying on the microstructural evolution and creep behavior of Al-Er-Sc-Zr-Si alloys,

    D. Erdeniz et al., “Effect of vanadium micro-alloying on the microstructural evolution and creep behavior of Al-Er-Sc-Zr-Si alloys, ” Acta Mater, vol. 124, pp. 501–512, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.033

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.033 2017

  55. [55]

    Numerical study on the measurement of thin film mechanical properties by means of nanoindentation,

    X. Chen and J. J. Vlassak, “Numerical study on the measurement of thin film mechanical properties by means of nanoindentation, ” J Mater Res, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 2974–2982, Oct. 2001, doi: 10.1557/JMR.2001.0408

    work page doi:10.1557/jmr.2001.0408 2001

  56. [56]

    Effects of the substrate on the determination of thin film mechanical properties by nanoindentation,

    R. Saha and W. D. Nix, “Effects of the substrate on the determination of thin film mechanical properties by nanoindentation, ” Acta Mater, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 23–38, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00328-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s1359-6454(01)00328-7 2002