REVIEW 2 cited by
Visual-O1: Understanding Ambiguous Instructions via Multi-modal Multi-turn Chain-of-thoughts Reasoning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As large-scale models evolve, language instructions are increasingly utilized in multi-modal tasks. Due to human language habits, these instructions often contain ambiguities in real-world scenarios, necessitating the integration of visual context or common sense for accurate interpretation. However, even highly intelligent large models exhibit significant performance limitations on ambiguous instructions, where weak reasoning abilities of disambiguation can lead to catastrophic errors. To address this issue, this paper proposes Visual-O1, a multi-modal multi-turn chain-of-thought reasoning framework. It simulates human multi-modal multi-turn reasoning, providing instantial experience for highly intelligent models or empirical experience for generally intelligent models to understand ambiguous instructions. Unlike traditional methods that require models to possess high intelligence to understand long texts or perform lengthy complex reasoning, our framework does not significantly increase computational overhead and is more general and effective, even for generally intelligent models. Experiments show that our method not only significantly enhances the performance of models of different intelligence levels on ambiguous instructions but also improves their performance on general datasets. Our work highlights the potential of artificial intelligence to work like humans in real-world scenarios with uncertainty and ambiguity. We will release our data and code.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
VFaith: Do Large Multimodal Models Really Reason on Seen Images Rather than Previous Memories?
A new benchmark with edited-image question pairs shows that multimodal reasoning models lose accuracy when visual cues change, suggesting their reasoning is often not faithfully tied to the image.
-
WeThink: Toward General-purpose Vision-Language Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning
WeThink, a 120K-image QA dataset with AI-generated reasoning paths, combined with hybrid-reward reinforcement learning, improves a 7B vision-language model across 14 benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.