The Impact of Inhomogeneous Perturbations of the Inflaton on the Cosmological Primordial Magnetic Field

Hang Wang; Shuang Liu; Yao-chuan Wang; Yu Li

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 74 references

The Impact of Inhomogeneous Perturbations of the Inflaton on the Cosmological Primordial Magnetic Field

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Inflaton ripples tilt primordial magnetic fields toward the red

desk verdict A real gauge-fixing idea is undone by treating initial-condition constants as running functions of time; the claimed scale-invariance shifts don't survive scrutiny. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.18000 v2 pith:FYYBJ3OE submitted 2025-04-25 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

Yu Li , Shuang Liu , Hang Wang , Yao-Chuan Wang This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.COgr-qc PACS 98.80.Cq

keywords inflationarymagnetogenesisprimordialmagneticfieldinflatonperturbationsscale-invariantspectrumRatramodelgeneralizedCoulombgaugespectralindexbackreaction

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that small ripples in the inflaton field, the same inhomogeneities that seed large-scale structure, leave a measurable imprint on the magnetic fields produced during inflation. In the standard Ratra-style magnetogenesis model the Coulomb gauge no longer enforces Gauss's law once the background is inhomogeneous, so the authors solve for the conjugate momentum instead of the vector potential and keep a coupling-function correction in the initial conditions. That correction grows late in inflation and changes the values of the coupling exponent gamma at which the electric and magnetic power spectra become scale invariant: electric at gamma = -2 or 1 rather than -3 or 2, magnetic at gamma = 2 rather than -2 or 3. For nearly scale-invariant magnetic fields the inhomogeneous perturbations shift the spectral index toward the red and push the largest deviation to smaller scales as inflation proceeds. If right, the tilt of a nearly scale-invariant primordial magnetic spectrum becomes a model-dependent observable that can distinguish large-field from small-field inflation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the mode function $\varpi(k,\eta)$ of the conjugate momentum $\bar\Pi^i_A$, whose evolution is a damped oscillator with a Bessel-function solution $\varpi(k,\eta) = \frac{\sqrt{-k\eta}}{\bar f}[C_1 J_{\gamma+1/2}(-k\eta) + C_2 J_{-\gamma-1/2}(-k\eta)]$ for a power-law coupling $\bar f \propto \eta^{\gamma}$. The load-bearing step is retaining the term $(\bar f'/\bar f + ik)$ in the initial condition rather than discarding $\bar f'/\bar f$; because $\bar f'/\bar f \propto \eta^{-1}$, this term grows and dominates late in inflation, changing the spectral exponents. Supporting machinery includes a generalized Coulomb gauge that satisfies the Gauss constraint with spatial inhomogeneities, a splitting of convolution integrals into large-scale and small-scale pieces, and the dimensionless corrections $\Delta_E = \delta P_E/\bar P_E$ and $\Delta_B = \delta P_B/\bar P_B$ that quantify the perturbation-induced changes to the electric and magnetic power spectra.

What would settle it

Fix the Bunch-Davies vacuum at a definite initial conformal time eta_i, so C1 and C2 in the Bessel solution are constants, recompute the super-horizon power spectra, and check whether the scale-invariant values return to gamma = -3, 2 for the electric field and gamma = -2, 3 for the magnetic field; if they do, the shifted conditions reported here disappear.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that inhomogeneous perturbations of the inflaton do not merely add noise to inflationary magnetogenesis; they change the conditions for a scale-invariant spectrum. After generalizing the Ratra action to a perturbed FRW background, the standard Coulomb gauge must be replaced by a gauge that satisfies the Gauss constraint in the presence of spatial perturbations, and the mode function of the conjugate momentum, not the vector potential, is the quantity solved directly. The coupling function f(phi) introduces corrections to the initial conditions of that mode function through the ratio f'/f; although small at the start of inflation, this ratio grows like $eta^{{-1}}$ and dominates at late times. With a power-law coupling f proportional to eta^gamma, the electric spectrum becomes scale invariant at gamma = -2 and gamma = 1 (instead of -3 and 2) and the magnetic spectrum at gamma = 2 (instead of -2 and 3). The paper then computes the leading corrections Delta_E and Delta_B from convolutions with inflaton perturbations, finds their ratio independent of the inflationary model, and shows that for a nearly scale-invariant magnetic spectrum (gamma = 2) the perturbations redden the spectral index when V_phi > 0 and make the location of maximal deviation migrate toward smaller scales as inflation proceeds.

Load-bearing premise

The argument treats the factor f'/f + ik in the Bessel solution as growing with conformal time during inflation; if it is instead fixed at the initial vacuum time as a constant, the new scale-invariance conditions do not arise.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Scale-invariant inflationary magnetic fields now require gamma = 2 rather than gamma = -2 or 3, so searches for a scale-invariant primordial spectrum should target models with an increasing coupling during inflation.
For gamma = 2, inhomogeneous inflaton perturbations make the magnetic spectral index redder when V_phi > 0, with the deviation growing toward smaller scales; this gives a concrete sign and scale dependence to look for in data.
The ratio Delta_E / Delta_B under slow roll is independent of the inflationary model, so a measurement of the electric-to-magnetic perturbation ratio would cleanly test the mechanism regardless of potential details.
Avoiding backreaction while keeping a scale-invariant magnetic spectrum forces the inflaton energy density below about 10^{-38} m_pl^4, still above the BBN scale, so viable models can exist.
The deviation parameter zeta maps onto the n_s-r plane, and different potentials (power-law, Starobinsky, hilltop) predict distinct zeta values, making the primordial magnetic spectral tilt a potential discriminator among inflation models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Our inference: if the f'/f initial-condition correction is this important, the same correction should appear in any inflationary magnetogenesis calculation that fixes the Bunch-Davies vacuum at a finite initial time, including models beyond the Ratra form, so earlier scale-invariance conditions may need revisiting.
Our inference: the predicted red tilt for gamma = 2 with V_phi > 0 could be tested indirectly through magnetically induced CMB polarization or 21-cm signals, where a scale-dependent tilt would appear as a running spectral index.
Our inference: the migration of the maximal deviation toward smaller scales implies that if a red tilt is observed at a specific scale today, the corresponding number of e-folds of inflation could be inferred, turning the primordial magnetic spectrum into a probe of the duration of inflation.
Our inference: the paper's split of convolution integrals at kappa about k neglects the window around kappa = k; a full numerical convolution would show whether the reported Delta_E and Delta_B values are accurate or only order-of-magnitude estimates.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's the short version: this paper has a genuine new idea, then loses it in a matching mistake that kills the headline results. The genuinely useful part is the generalized Coulomb gauge: in an inhomogeneous background the standard gauge doesn't automatically satisfy the Gauss constraint, and working with the conjugate momentum rather than the vector potential is a sensible way to handle that. The large/small-scale split for the convolution is also a practical touch. That material is worth reading and could be the basis of a solid paper.

The problem is the central derivation. The mode function is written as the Bessel combination (51) with constants C1 and C2 fixed by the BD initial condition. The authors then place f'/f into C1 and C2, Eqs. (54)-(55), and treat that factor as running with conformal time. That only works if the coefficients are evaluated at some chosen initial time η_i. If they are, the matching factor is a constant, the extra η^{-1} never appears, and the scale-invariance conditions stay at the conventional values (γ=-3,2 electric; γ=-2,3 magnetic). If instead the coefficients are taken to depend on the running time, then (55) is not a solution of the mode equation (50) — differentiating brings in extra terms not present in the Bessel equation. The paper never specifies η_i, and the text explicitly says the f'/f term 'grows during inflation,' which is exactly the error: integration constants fixed by initial data cannot grow. This is the entire source of the claimed new conditions γ=-2,1 and γ=2, so the central result falls.

The neglect of Q_i in Eq. (38) is a second, independent issue. Q_i is first order in δϕ. To compute a first-order correction to the power spectrum, you need to keep the first-order source; dropping it removes the very effect the paper wants to compute. That is not a harmless simplification.

Credit where due: the constraint algebra in Section II is careful, the observation about the standard Coulomb gauge failing in inhomogeneous spacetimes is correct, and the observational comparison is honestly presented as a model-parameter survey on the Planck n_S-r plane rather than a direct measurement. But these strengths don't carry the main claim.

Who is this for? It is for people who work on inflationary magnetogenesis and gauge issues in perturbation theory. A corrected version, with η_i fixed and Q_i kept through first order, could be genuinely useful. As it stands, the main conclusions are unsupported and I would not cite the scale-invariance results. I would still send it to peer review — a careful referee can identify exactly what needs to change, and the gauge-fixing framework deserves a public airing. But my recommendation is reject in current form.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies inflationary magnetogenesis in a perturbed FRW spacetime with scalar metric perturbations and inflaton perturbations. It generalizes the Ratra coupling f^2 F^2 to this setting, argues that the standard Coulomb gauge must be modified, and solves for the conjugate momentum rather than the vector potential. With a power-law coupling f ∝ η^γ, the authors derive a Bessel solution for the mode function ϖ, retain the term f'/f from the initial condition, and claim that this term dominates at late times and changes the scale-invariance conditions: electric fields become scale-invariant at γ = -2, 1 and magnetic fields at γ = 2, instead of the conventional electric γ = -3, 2 and magnetic γ = -2, 3. They also compute first-order corrections Δ_E and Δ_B from inflaton perturbations, derive V_φ-dependent spectral-index deviations, discuss backreaction constraints, and present contours on the (n_S, r) plane for power-law, Starobinsky, and hilltop potentials with reference to Planck 2018.

Significance. If the central derivation were valid, the paper would offer a concrete, falsifiable modification of standard inflationary magnetogenesis: shifted scale-invariance conditions, a V_φ-dependent spectral tilt, and a characteristic scale that migrates during inflation as a possible discriminator between large- and small-field models. The treatment of the Gauss constraint in a perturbed spacetime and the use of the conjugate momentum are reasonable and address a genuine technical issue. However, the central claims do not survive a correct treatment of the initial-value problem, and the first-order truncation behind Δ_E and Δ_B is also not justified. The paper therefore does not establish its main results.

major comments (2)

[III.C, Eqs. (54)-(58)] The central result rests on treating the factor (f'/f + ik) in the matched coefficients C1 and C2 as a running function of conformal time. In a standard initial-value problem, C1 and C2 are integration constants fixed by the initial condition (53) at some initial time η_i; the factor (f'/f + ik) should be evaluated at η_i and is then a constant. Eq. (55) is a solution of Eq. (50) only if C1 and C2 are constant. If they are instead taken to depend on η through f'/f = γ/η, differentiating Eq. (55) produces additional terms not present in the Bessel equation, so Eq. (55) is not a solution. The paper never specifies η_i. The statement in the text that f'/f 'grows increasingly significant' as inflation progresses is exactly the error: an integration constant fixed by initial data cannot grow. With constant coefficients, the late-time prefactor in Eq. (58) is η-independent, and the super-horizon scaling is ϖ ∝ f^{-1}(-kη)^α; the extra η^{-1} that converts Eq. (69) into Eq. (70), and hence the new spectral indices in Eqs. (71) and (96), disappear. The claimed scale-invariance conditions γ = -2, 1 for the electric field and γ = 2 for the magnetic field are therefore not established.
[III.A, Eqs. (38)-(39)] The source term Q_i in Eq. (38) is first order in δϕ, and the subsequent calculation of δP_E and δP_B is also first order in δϕ (Eqs. (66)-(68) and (92)-(94)). Setting Q_i ≈ 0 while keeping the zeroth-order mode function and then computing first-order corrections through the convolutions in Eqs. (47a) and (47b) omits the first-order correction to the mode function itself that is driven by Q_i. This is not a consistent first-order truncation: the first-order source is of the same order as the effects being computed. The approximation may be salvageable in some limit, but the paper provides no argument that the Q_i-induced correction is subdominant. As a result, the derived expressions for Δ_E and Δ_B are incomplete, and the subsequent V_φ-dependent spectral-index predictions built on them do not follow from the equations presented.

minor comments (5)

[Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typographical errors, including 'suloution' below Eq. (55), 'Hamiltanian' and 'metirc' in Section II.B, 'equibalence' in Section II.C, 'transtition' in the Introduction, and 'independed' in the Summary; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
[IV.B] The text refers to 'the integral of z in (101)', but there is no Eq. (101); the intended reference appears to be Eq. (85).
[IV.A, Eq. (74)] In Eq. (74), the symbol γ is used both for the coupling index and for the Euler-Mascheroni constant in the α = -1 branch, which is confusing and should be disambiguated.
[V.B] The comparison with Planck 2018 is described as an observational comparison, but Figs. 9-11 show model contours on the (n_S, r) plane and do not use data on the primordial magnetic-field spectral index; the wording should be adjusted to reflect that these are theoretical contours evaluated in regions allowed by Planck constraints on inflation.
[IV.A-IV.B, Eqs. (75) and (98)] The ratios Δ_E and Δ_B are defined as spectrum ratios but contain explicit factors of k and H whose units are not tracked; a dimensionless normalization or a statement of the units used would improve clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the claimed scale-invariance shifts follow from the retained f'/f term, not from fitting to the target spectra; the only self-citations are non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's new scale-invariance conditions (electric at gamma=-2,1; magnetic at gamma=2) are obtained by retaining the f'/f factor in the mode-function solution, Eq. (58), and then computing the spectral index from Eq. (70), n_E=2alpha+2. This is an algebraic consequence of the retained term, not a fit to the power spectrum it purports to predict; no parameter is tuned to the target spectra. The inhomogeneous-perturbation corrections Delta_E and Delta_B are evaluated with standard external inputs (Bessel asymptotics, delta-phi from Dodelson & Schmidt, Planck 2018 data), so the comparison with observations is not circular. The only self-citations (Refs. [48], [51]) motivate the generalized Coulomb gauge and cite the authors' earlier magnetogenesis models; neither supplies a load-bearing premise for the central derivation. A separate correctness concern, noted but not circular, is that Eqs. (54)-(55) fix C1 and C2 as constants while Eq. (58) later treats (f'/f+ik) as a running function of eta; fixing the constants at an initial time would remove the eta^{-1} factor. That is a derivation error or missing proof, not an equivalence of outputs to inputs, so the circularity burden remains low.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a power-law coupling, slow-roll inflation, the standard de Sitter mode function for delta_phi, and two unjustified approximations: retaining f'/f as a running coefficient in the matched solution and dropping the first-order source Q_i. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)

gamma (coupling index) = unspecified; central cases gamma=1,2 discussed
The power-law coupling f proportional to eta^gamma is chosen by hand, and the claimed scale-invariance conditions and spectral indices depend directly on gamma.
theta/f_bar (coupling-derivative ratio) = model-dependent, expressed via (f'/f)/phi'
The amplitudes Delta_E and Delta_B are proportional to theta/f_bar; the paper relates it to slow-roll quantities but does not fix its value from data.
H (inflation scale) and rho_inf = rho_inf up to 10^-10 m_pl^4 considered
The backreaction bounds and the zeta predictions depend on the inflation energy scale.
epsilon and N (slow-roll parameter and e-fold number) = ranges 0.05-0.45 and 50-60 used
The Planck-comparison quantity zeta = -N sqrt(epsilon(3-epsilon)) is built from these model parameters.
eta_i (initial matching time) = not specified
The central result changes depending on whether f'/f is evaluated at eta_i or at the current time; the paper leaves this parameter undefined.

assumptions (7)

standard math The Bessel functions J_{gamma +/- 1/2}(-k eta) provide the general solution of the mode equation (50) for f proportional to eta^gamma.
Invoked in Eq. (51).
domain assumption The background is FRW with scalar metric perturbations in conformal Newtonian gauge, and Phi = -Psi.
Equations (27)-(28) and text after Eq. (32).
domain assumption The inflaton perturbation mode function is delta_phi_kappa = (1/(a sqrt(2 kappa)))(1 - i/(kappa eta)) e^{-i kappa eta}.
Used in Eq. (62) and (82), cited to Dodelson and Schmidt; assumes a light scalar on de Sitter.
domain assumption Metric perturbation Psi can be neglected relative to delta_phi on the scales of interest.
Section IV.A, text following Eq. (61).
ad hoc to paper The first-order source Q_i in Eq. (38) can be dropped because it is O(delta_phi), even though first-order corrections to the spectrum are being computed.
This is not generally valid; a first-order source contributes at the same order as the projection effect retained in the paper.
domain assumption Slow-roll approximation phi' approximately -V_phi/(3H) and V approximately (3-epsilon)m_pl^2H^2/(8 pi).
Used in Eqs. (114) and (122)-(124) for spectral-index deviations and zeta.
domain assumption To avoid strong coupling, f = 1 at the end of inflation and gamma > 0.
Section IV.C, following Eq. (95).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Impact of Inhomogeneous Perturbations of the Inflaton on the Cosmological Primordial Magnetic Field." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FYYBJ3OE

@misc{pith2026250418000,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Impact of Inhomogeneous Perturbations of the Inflaton on the Cosmological Primordial Magnetic Field},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FYYBJ3OE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.18000}
}

abstract

We investigate the impact of inhomogeneous inflaton perturbations on primordial magnetic fields within the framework of generalized inflationary magnetogenesis models. Extending the Ratra model to general spacetime backgrounds, we analyze the constraint structure of the electromagnetic field and demonstrate that the standard Coulomb gauge must be generalized to accommodate spatial inhomogeneities. Instead of the vector potential, we solve the conjugate momentum with the modified initial conditions introduced by the coupling function, which become dominant during the late stages of inflation. These change the conditions under which scale-invariant electromagnetic spectra are achieved. Furthermore, we address the challenge of evaluating convolutions between vector potentials and inflaton perturbations by employing separate large- and small-scale approximations. The resulting influence to the electric and magnetic power spectra are quantified using $\Delta_E$ and $\Delta_B$, revealing a scale-dependent influence of inhomogeneities. We also find that the spectrum index evolution is sensitive to the sign of $V_{\phi}$, with distinctive behaviors for electric and magnetic fields under different scale-invariance conditions. Notably, for nearly scale-invariant magnetic fields, the perturbative effects shift the spectral index towards the red and migrate toward smaller scales as inflation progresses, offering a potential observational probe to differentiate between large-field and small-field inflation scenarios.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.18000 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2: The electromagnetic field spectrum at the end [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4: The evolution of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (7 more)

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: The evolution of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: The evolution of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6: The evolution of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8: The curve of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9: Contour lines of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10: Contour lines of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11: Contour lines of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

[1]

However, this restricts the form of the coupling function—it must ensure the con- sistency of the theory

Choosing an appropriate coupling function f(ϕ) so that the constraint is automatically satisfied in the Coulomb gauge. However, this restricts the form of the coupling function—it must ensure the con- sistency of the theory

work page
[2]

′” denotes the derivative with respect to confor- mal time. The spatial componets of (5) are: A′′ i + 2

Selecting a new gauge that automatically satisfies the constraint. This approach is equivalent to solv- ing the constraint equation together with Maxwell’s equations. In this paper, we adopt the second approach. III. INFLATIONARY MAGNETOGENESIS In this section, we consider the inflationary magneto- genesis under the FRW metric with inhomogeneous per- turb...

work page 2018
[3]

T. R. Seshadri and K. Subramanian, Cosmic microwave background bispectrum from primordial magnetic fields on large angular scales, Physical Review Letters 103, 081303 (2009)

work page 2009
[4]

J. D. Barrow, P. G. Ferreira, and J. Silk, Constraints on a primordial magnetic field, Physical Review Letters 78, 3610 (1997)

work page 1997
[5]

Blasi, S

P. Blasi, S. Burles, and A. V. Olinto, Cosmological mag- netic field limits in an inhomogeneous universe, The As- trophysical Journal 514, L79 (1999)

work page 1999
[6]

Neronov and I

A. Neronov and I. Vovk, Evidence for strong extragalac- tic magnetic fields from fermi observations of tev blazars, Science 328, 73 (2010)

work page 2010
[7]

Akahori and D

T. Akahori and D. Ryu, Faraday rotation measure due to the intergalactic magnetic field, The Astrophysical Jour- nal 723, 476 (2010)

work page 2010
[8]

Dolag, M

K. Dolag, M. Kachelriess, S. Ostapchenko, and R. Tom` as, Lower limit on the strength and filling factor of extra- galactic magnetic fields, The Astrophysical Journal Let- ters 727, L4 (2010)

work page 2010

Show all 74 references

[9]

S. P. O’Sullivan, M. Br¨ uggen, F. Vazza, E. Carretti, N. T. Locatelli, C. Stuardi, V. Vacca, T. Vernstrom, G. Heald, C. Horellou, T. W. Shimwell, M. J. Hardcastle, C. Tasse, and H. R¨ ottgering, New constraints on the magnetization of the cosmic web using lofar faraday rotati...

2020
[10]

constraints on primordial mag- netic fields, Astron

Planck 2015 results - xix. constraints on primordial mag- netic fields, Astron. Astrophys. 594, A19 (2016)

2016
[11]

Vernstrom, B

T. Vernstrom, B. M. Gaensler, L. Rudnick, and H. An- dernach, Differences in faraday rotation between adjacent extragalactic radio sources as a probe of cosmic magnetic fields, The Astrophysical Journal 878, 92 (2019)

2019
[12]

Hanayama, K

H. Hanayama, K. Takahashi, K. Kotake, M. Oguri, K. Ichiki, and H. Ohno, Biermann mechanism in primor- dial supernova remnant and seed magnetic fields, The Astrophysical Journal 633, 941 (2005)

2005
[13]

Tiede, A

P. Tiede, A. E. Broderick, M. Shalaby, C. Pfrommer, E. Puchwein, P. Chang, and A. Lamberts, Constraints on the intergalactic magnetic field from bow ties in the gamma-ray sky, The Astrophysical Journal 892, 123 (2020)

2020
[14]

L. M. Widrow, Origin of galactic and extragalactic mag- netic fields, Reviews of Modern Physics 74, 775 (2002)

2002
[15]

Papanikolaou and K

T. Papanikolaou and K. N. Gourgouliatos, Constraining supermassive primordial black holes with magnetically induced gravitational waves, Physical Review D 108, 063532 (2023)

2023
[16]

Safarzadeh, Primordial black holes as seeds of mag- netic fields in the universe, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 479, 315 (2018)

M. Safarzadeh, Primordial black holes as seeds of mag- netic fields in the universe, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 479, 315 (2018)

2018
[17]

I. J. Araya, M. E. Rubio, M. San Mart´ ın, F. A. Stasyszyn, N. D. Padilla, J. Maga˜ na, and J. Sureda, Magnetic field generation from pbh distributions, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 503, 4387 (2021)

2021
[18]

Ackermann et al

M. Ackermann et al. , The search for spatial extension in high-latitude sources detected by the fermi large area telescope, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 237, 32 (2018)

2018
[19]

Papanikolaou and K

T. Papanikolaou and K. N. Gourgouliatos, Primordial magnetic field generation via primordial black hole disks, Physical Review D 107, 103532 (2023)

2023
[20]

Archambault et al., Search for magnetically broadened cascade emission from blazars with veritas, The Astro- physical Journal 835, 288 (2017)

S. Archambault et al., Search for magnetically broadened cascade emission from blazars with veritas, The Astro- physical Journal 835, 288 (2017)

2017
[21]

Enqvist and P

K. Enqvist and P. Olesen, On primordial magnetic fields of electroweak origin, Physics Letters B 319, 178 (1993)

1993
[22]

J. M. Quashnock, A. Loeb, and D. N. Spergel, Magnetic field generation during the cosmological qcd phase tran- 17 sition, The Astrophysical Journal 344, L49 (1989)

1989
[23]

Vachaspati, Magnetic fields from cosmological phase transitions, Physics Letters B 265, 258 (1991)

T. Vachaspati, Magnetic fields from cosmological phase transitions, Physics Letters B 265, 258 (1991)

1991
[24]

G. Sigl, A. V. Olinto, and K. Jedamzik, Primordial mag- netic fields from cosmological first order phase transi- tions, Physical Review D 55, 4582 (1997)

1997
[25]

Cheng and A

B. Cheng and A. V. Olinto, Primordial magnetic fields generated in the quark-hadron transition, Physical Re- view D 50, 2421 (1994)

1994
[26]

G. Baym, D. B¨ odeker, and L. McLerran, Magnetic fields produced by phase transition bubbles in the electroweak phase transition, Physical Review D 53, 662 (1996)

1996
[27]

A. G. Tevzadze, L. Kisslinger, A. Brandenburg, and T. Kahniashvili, Magnetic fields from qcd phase tran- sitions, The Astrophysical Journal 759, 54 (2012)

2012
[28]

Hindmarsh and A

M. Hindmarsh and A. Everett, Magnetic fields from phase transitions, Physical Review D 58, 103505 (1998)

1998
[29]

L. S. Kisslinger, Magnetic wall from chiral phase tran- sition and cmbr correlations, Physical Review D 68, 043516 (2003)

2003
[30]

M. O. Olea-Romacho, Primordial magnetogenesis in the two-higgs-doublet model, Physical Review D109, 015023 (2024)

2024
[31]

Ellis, M

J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, M. Lewicki, V. Vaskonen, and A. Wickens, Intergalactic magnetic fields from first-order phase transitions, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparti- cle Physics 2019 (09), 019

2019
[32]

Vachaspati, Progress on cosmological magnetic fields, Reports on Progress in Physics 84, 074901 (2021)

T. Vachaspati, Progress on cosmological magnetic fields, Reports on Progress in Physics 84, 074901 (2021)

2021
[33]

M. S. Turner and L. M. Widrow, Inflation-produced, large-scale magnetic fields, Physical Review D 37, 2743 (1988)

1988
[34]

Brandenburg, K

A. Brandenburg, K. Enqvist, and P. Olesen, Large-scale magnetic fields from hydromagnetic turbulence in the very early universe, Physical Review D 54, 1291 (1996)

1996
[35]

Banerjee and K

R. Banerjee and K. Jedamzik, Evolution of cosmic mag- netic fields: From the very early universe, to recombi- nation, to the present, Physical Review D 70, 123003 (2004)

2004
[36]

Kobayashi and N

T. Kobayashi and N. Afshordi, Schwinger effect in 4d de sitter space and constraints on magnetogenesis in the early universe, Journal of High Energy Physics2014, 166 (2014)

2014
[37]

Ratra, Cosmological “seed” magnetic field from infla- tion, The Astrophysical Journal 391, L1 (1992)

B. Ratra, Cosmological “seed” magnetic field from infla- tion, The Astrophysical Journal 391, L1 (1992)

1992
[38]

Martin and J

J. Martin and J. Yokoyama, Generation of large scale magnetic fields in single-field inflation, Journal of Cos- mology and Astroparticle Physics 2008 (01), 025

2008
[39]

Tasinato, A scenario for inflationary magnetogenesis without strong coupling problem, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (03), 040

G. Tasinato, A scenario for inflationary magnetogenesis without strong coupling problem, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (03), 040

2015
[40]

Atmjeet, I

K. Atmjeet, I. Pahwa, T. R. Seshadri, and K. Sub- ramanian, Cosmological magnetogenesis from extra- dimensional gauss-bonnet gravity, Physical Review D89, 063002 (2014)

2014
[41]

Giovannini, Inflationary magnetogenesis, derivative couplings, and relativistic van der waals interactions, Physical Review D 92, 043521 (2015)

M. Giovannini, Inflationary magnetogenesis, derivative couplings, and relativistic van der waals interactions, Physical Review D 92, 043521 (2015)

2015
[42]

Sharma, K

R. Sharma, K. Subramanian, and T. R. Seshadri, Gener- ation of helical magnetic field in a viable scenario of infla- tionary magnetogenesis, Physical Review D 97, 083503 (2018)

2018
[43]

Dom` enech, C

G. Dom` enech, C. Lin, and M. Sasaki, Inflationary magne- togenesis with broken local u(1) symmetry, Europhysics Letters 115, 19001 (2016)

2016
[44]

Sharma, S

R. Sharma, S. Jagannathan, T. R. Seshadri, and K. Sub- ramanian, Challenges in inflationary magnetogenesis: Constraints from strong coupling, backreaction, and the schwinger effect, Physical Review D 96, 083511 (2017)

2017
[45]

Bamba, E

K. Bamba, E. Elizalde, S. Odintsov, and T. Paul, Infla- tionary magnetogenesis with reheating phase from higher curvature coupling, Journal of Cosmology and Astropar- ticle Physics 2021 (04), 009

2021
[46]

Fujita and R

T. Fujita and R. Durrer, Scale-invariant helical magnetic fields from inflation, Journal of Cosmology and Astropar- ticle Physics 2019 (09), 008

2019
[47]

Yu. V. Shtanov and M. V. Pavliuk, Inflationary mag- netogenesis with helical coupling, Ukrainian Journal of Physics 64, 1009 (2019)

2019
[48]

Li and L.-Y

Y. Li and L.-Y. Zhang, Inflationary magnetogenesis with a self-consistent coupling function, Modern Physics Let- ters A 37, 2250069 (2022)

2022
[49]

Giovannini, Inflationary magnetogenesis in the per- turbative regime, Classical and Quantum Gravity 38, 135018 (2021)

M. Giovannini, Inflationary magnetogenesis in the per- turbative regime, Classical and Quantum Gravity 38, 135018 (2021)

2021
[50]

Durrer, O

R. Durrer, O. Sobol, and S. Vilchinskii, Magnetogenesis in higgs-starobinsky inflation, Physical Review D 106, 123520 (2022)

2022
[51]

Li and L.-Y

Y. Li and L.-Y. Zhang, Inflationary magnetogenesis of primordial magnetic fields with multiple vector fields, Modern Physics Letters A 38, 2350062 (2023)

2023
[52]

Tripathy, D

S. Tripathy, D. Chowdhury, H. V. Ragavendra, R. K. Jain, and L. Sriramkumar, Circumventing the challenges in the choice of the nonconformal coupling function in inflationary magnetogenesis, Physical Review D 107, 043501 (2023)

2023
[53]

Vel´ asquez, H

J. Vel´ asquez, H. J. Hortua, and L. Casta˜ neda, About jordan and einstein frames: a study in inflationary mag- netogenesis (2023), arXiv:2303.01301 [gr-qc]

2023 arXiv
[54]

Kandus, K

A. Kandus, K. E. Kunze, and C. G. Tsagas, Primordial magnetogenesis, Physics Reports 505, 1 (2011)

2011
[55]

Dimopoulos, A

K. Dimopoulos, A. Ghoshal, and T. Papanikolaou, Is inflationary magnetogenesis sensitive to the post- inflationary history ? (2024), arXiv:2412.10367 [astro- ph]

2024
[56]

Subramanian, Magnetic fields in the early universe, Astronomische Nachrichten 331, 110 (2010)

K. Subramanian, Magnetic fields in the early universe, Astronomische Nachrichten 331, 110 (2010)

2010
[57]

Barnaby, R

N. Barnaby, R. Namba, and M. Peloso, Observable non- gaussianity from gauge field production in slow roll infla- tion, and a challenging connection with magnetogenesis, Physical Review D 85, 123523 (2012)

2012
[58]

Subramanian, The origin, evolution and signatures of primordial magnetic fields, Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 076901 (2016)

K. Subramanian, The origin, evolution and signatures of primordial magnetic fields, Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 076901 (2016)

2016
[59]

Giovannini, Large-scale magnetic fields, curvature fluctuations, and the thermal history of the universe, Physical Review D 76, 103508 (2007)

M. Giovannini, Large-scale magnetic fields, curvature fluctuations, and the thermal history of the universe, Physical Review D 76, 103508 (2007)

2007
[60]

T. Adi, H. A. G. Cruz, and M. Kamionkowski, Primor- dial density perturbations from magnetic fields, Physical 18 Review D 108, 023521 (2023)

2023
[61]

Giovannini, Fluctuations of inflationary magnetogen- esis, Physical Review D 87, 083004 (2013)

M. Giovannini, Fluctuations of inflationary magnetogen- esis, Physical Review D 87, 083004 (2013)

2013
[62]

Piccinelli, ´A

G. Piccinelli, ´A. S´ anchez, A. Ayala, and A. J. Mizher, Warm inflation in the presence of magnetic fields, Phys- ical Review D 90, 083504 (2014)

2014
[63]

Tolksdorf, The generalized radiation gauge in curved space-time, General Relativity and Gravitation 24, 625 (1992)

J. Tolksdorf, The generalized radiation gauge in curved space-time, General Relativity and Gravitation 24, 625 (1992)

1992
[64]

Bhaumik, T

A. Bhaumik, T. Papanikolaou, and A. Ghoshal, Vector induced gravitational waves sourced by primordial mag- netic fields (2025), arXiv:2504.10477 [astro-ph]

2025 arXiv
[65]

A. L. Maroto, Primordial magnetic fields from metric per- turbations, Physical Review D 64, 083006 (2001)

2001
[66]

Egorov, M

V. Egorov, M. Smolyakov, and I. Volobuev, Quantization of electromagnetic field in the schwarzschild spacetime (2024), arXiv:2410.07049 [gr-qc, physics:hep-th]

2024
[67]

C. G. Tsagas, Electromagnetic fields in curved space- times, Classical and Quantum Gravity 22, 393 (2004)

2004
[68]

Hwang and H

J.-c. Hwang and H. Noh, Maxwell equations in curved spacetime, https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.14555v1 (2023)

2023 arXiv
[69]

Demozzi, V

V. Demozzi, V. Mukhanov, and H. Rubinstein, Mag- netic fields from inflation?, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2009 (08), 025

2009
[70]

Weinberg, Cosmology (Oxford University Press, 2024)

S. Weinberg, Cosmology (Oxford University Press, 2024)

2024
[71]

Dodelson and F

S. Dodelson and F. Schmidt, Modern cosmology (Else- vier, 2024)

2024
[73]

Martin and C

J. Martin and C. Ringeval, Inflation after wmap3: con- fronting the slow-roll and exact power spectra with cmb data, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2006 (08), 009

2006
[74]

Collaboration, Planck 2018 results. x. constraints on in- flation, Astronomy & Astrophysics 641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph]

2020 arXiv
[2018]

In the intersection of these two regions, the power-law potential model shows good agreement with the Planck 2018 observational re- sults [71]

The yellow region corresponds to the theoretical range with N∈ [50, 60], the green region represents the theoretical range with p∈ [2/3, 2]. In the intersection of these two regions, the power-law potential model shows good agreement with the Planck 2018 observational re- sult...

2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

However, this restricts the form of the coupling function—it must ensure the con- sistency of the theory

Choosing an appropriate coupling function f(ϕ) so that the constraint is automatically satisfied in the Coulomb gauge. However, this restricts the form of the coupling function—it must ensure the con- sistency of the theory

work page

[2] [2]

′” denotes the derivative with respect to confor- mal time. The spatial componets of (5) are: A′′ i + 2

Selecting a new gauge that automatically satisfies the constraint. This approach is equivalent to solv- ing the constraint equation together with Maxwell’s equations. In this paper, we adopt the second approach. III. INFLATIONARY MAGNETOGENESIS In this section, we consider the inflationary magneto- genesis under the FRW metric with inhomogeneous per- turb...

work page 2018

[3] [3]

T. R. Seshadri and K. Subramanian, Cosmic microwave background bispectrum from primordial magnetic fields on large angular scales, Physical Review Letters 103, 081303 (2009)

work page 2009

[4] [4]

J. D. Barrow, P. G. Ferreira, and J. Silk, Constraints on a primordial magnetic field, Physical Review Letters 78, 3610 (1997)

work page 1997

[5] [5]

Blasi, S

P. Blasi, S. Burles, and A. V. Olinto, Cosmological mag- netic field limits in an inhomogeneous universe, The As- trophysical Journal 514, L79 (1999)

work page 1999

[6] [6]

Neronov and I

A. Neronov and I. Vovk, Evidence for strong extragalac- tic magnetic fields from fermi observations of tev blazars, Science 328, 73 (2010)

work page 2010

[7] [7]

Akahori and D

T. Akahori and D. Ryu, Faraday rotation measure due to the intergalactic magnetic field, The Astrophysical Jour- nal 723, 476 (2010)

work page 2010

[8] [8]

Dolag, M

K. Dolag, M. Kachelriess, S. Ostapchenko, and R. Tom` as, Lower limit on the strength and filling factor of extra- galactic magnetic fields, The Astrophysical Journal Let- ters 727, L4 (2010)

work page 2010