The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 1108.3533 · v1 · pith:FZLMOX73 · submitted 2011-08-17 · nucl-ex

Reply to Comment on "High-Precision Determination of the Electric and Magnetic Form Factors of the Proton"

J. C. Bernauer , P. Achenbach , C. Ayerbe Gayoso , R. B\"ohm , D. Bosnar , L. Debenjak , M. O. Distler , L. Doria
show 17 more authors
A. Esser H. Fonvieille J. M. Friedrich J. Friedrich M. G\'omez Rodr\'iguez de la Paz M. Makek H. Merkel D. G. Middleton U. M\"uller L. Nungesser J. Pochodzalla M. Potokar S. S\'anchez Majos B. S. Schlimme S. \v{S}irca Th. Walcher M. Weinriefer
This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:FZLMOX73record.jsonopen to challenge →

classification nucl-ex
keywords commentanalysisarxivcalculationscorrectionsformnucl-exuncertainty
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In arXiv:1108.3058v1 [nucl-ex], Arrington criticizes the Coulomb corrections we applied in the analysis of high precision form factor data (see Phys.Rev.Lett.105:242001, 2010, arXiv:1007.5076v3 [nucl-ex]). We show, by comparing different calculations cited in the Comment, that the criticism of the Comment neglects the large uncertainty of "more modern" TPE corrections. This uncertainty has also been seen in recent polarized measurements. We rerun our analysis using one of these calculations. The results show that the Comment exaggerates the quantitative effect at small Q^2.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.