Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 107 references

Quantum simulations of complex systems

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a quantum battery charged by the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev interaction stores energy extensively in the particle number N but charges with superextensive power, scaling as N to the 3/2, a genuine speed-up over local charging…

desk verdict Solid review, no new results; the SYK battery scaling claim needs a caveat given the Dicke normalization caution in the same paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.20442 v1 pith:G25IADKA submitted 2025-05-26 quant-ph

Oliver Morsch , G. Massimo Palma , Davide Rossini This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords quantumsimulationSachdev-Ye-Kitaevmodelbatteriesreservoircomputingextremelearningmachinesfastscramblingannealingadvantage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review makes the case that quantum simulators are best used to probe genuinely complex quantum systems, and it takes the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model as the paradigmatic example. Its most concrete quantitative claim is that a quantum battery charged by the SYK interaction stores energy extensively with particle number $N$ but charges with superextensive power, $P_N \propto N^{3/2}$. If true, this would mean that chaotic, fast-scrambling many-body interactions can charge quantum batteries faster than any local or parallel scheme, and the speed-up would grow with system size. The review argues this is not a normalization artifact by contrasting it with the Dicke battery, whose apparent $N^{3/2}$ power collapses to linear once the coupling is rescaled for extensivity, and with a bosonic SYK variant that lacks the nonlocal Jordan-Wigner strings.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Hamiltonian, $\mathcal{H}_{\rm SYK} = (2N)^{-3/2} \sum_{i,j,k,l} \tilde J_{ijkl} c^\dagger_i c^\dagger_j c_k c_l$, with independent Gaussian random couplings; the $1/(2N)^{3/2}$ prefactor is chosen so the bandwidth is of order $N$ and thermodynamic quantities are extensive in the large-$N$ limit. A Jordan-Wigner transformation maps the fermions to a spin-1/2 network, introducing nonlocal strings that couple distant sites. The battery protocol is a double quench: the system starts in the ground state of $H_0 = \omega J_y$, evolves under $H_I = \mathcal{H}_{\rm SYK}$ for a charging time $\tau$, and is then quenched back; the power is $P_N = E_N/\tau$. The argument that the scaling is genuine uses the uniform occupation of the $N+1$ energy shells of $H_0$, the large-$N$ saddle-point equations for the Green's function, and saturation of the chaos bound $\lambda_L \leq 2\pi T$, which make SYK maximally scrambling with thermalization time $\tau_{\rm eq} \sim T^{-1}$.

What would settle it

Run exact diagonalization for the double-quench SYK charging protocol at $N=12,16,20$, and larger if feasible, averaging over many disorder realizations, and plot $\log P_N(\tau)$ versus $\log N$ at the optimal charging time. If the slope trends to $1$ rather than staying at $3/2$, or if the $3/2$ exponent changes when the coupling prefactor in Eq. (50) is rescaled while preserving extensivity, then the superextensive charging claim is a finite-size or normalization artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central result is that the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model can be turned into a quantum battery whose charging performance beats conventional many-body chargers. Using the SYK random two-body interaction as the charging Hamiltonian $H_I$ in the double-quench protocol, exact diagonalization up to $N=16$ gives a stored energy that remains extensive, $E_N(\tau) \propto N$, while the charging power scales as $P_N(\tau) \propto N^{3/2}$ (Eq. (54)). The mechanism is scrambling: after a short transient the populations of the charging-basis energy levels become uniform, $p_k(\tau) \approx 2^{-N} \binom{N}{k}$, the signature of a chaotic, fast-scrambling system. The review contrasts this with the Dicke battery, where a similar-looking $N^{3/2}$ power is an artifact of an unrescaled coupling and reverts to linear scaling once extensivity is imposed, and with a bosonic variant of SYK, which does not show the superextensive power because the nonlocal Jordan-Wigner strings are absent.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the $N^{3/2}$ charging power of the SYK battery is a true many-body effect and not a finite-size or normalization artifact; the review itself shows how a superficially identical $N^{3/2}$ in the Dicke battery disappears once the coupling is rescaled for extensivity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the SYK charging power is superextensive, a quantum battery made of $N$ fast-scrambling cells charges faster than the best extensive protocol, and the relative speed-up grows with $N$.
  • The same fast scrambling that powers the battery also gives a thermalization time $\tau_{\rm eq} \sim T^{-1}$, so the battery reaches its charged state much faster than the $T^{-2}$ equilibration of normal metals.
  • The contrast with the bosonic SYK variant points to nonlocal Jordan-Wigner strings as the physical mechanism behind the enhanced charging, not merely random pair hopping.
  • Because the SYK interaction can be Jordan-Wigner mapped to a spin Hamiltonian, the charging protocol can in principle be implemented on the digital quantum simulators the review discusses, such as superconducting or nuclear-spin platforms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension of the review's mechanism is to truncate or soften the Jordan-Wigner strings in an engineered spin model: if the charging-power exponent drops from $3/2$ toward $1$ as the strings are shortened, nonlocality rather than chaos alone is the operative ingredient.
  • The review leaves open how much of the charged energy is extractable work: since the SYK-charged state is locally mixed and highly entangled, its ergotropy per cell may grow more slowly than the total stored energy, which would moderate the practical advantage.
  • If the scaling is real, other fast-scrambling or random-unitary charging Hamiltonians should show similar superextensive power, so measuring $P_N(\tau)$ could serve as a diagnostic of scrambling in quantum simulators.
  • The $N^{3/2}$ result is presented as asymptotic, but the paper does not prove that the $1/(2N)^{3/2}$ normalization is the unique extensive convention, so the stability of the exponent under other normalizations remains an open question.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This review article surveys quantum simulation of complex systems, with a focus on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) model and its applications to quantum batteries. The first part contrasts quantum computers with analogue simulators and discusses quantum annealing. The second part introduces quantum reservoir computing and extreme learning machines, including two experimental implementations. The third part presents the SYK model in some technical detail: its Hamiltonian, Jordan-Wigner mapping, large-N saddle-point solution, entropy, Green's function, and scrambling properties. The final parts discuss quantum battery protocols, contrasting the Dicke model (where a naive superextensive power is an extensivity artifact) with the SYK model (where a genuine superextensive power is claimed), and review experimental platforms such as trapped ions, Rydberg atoms, superconducting circuits, and photons.

Significance. The review is a useful and readable synthesis that connects quantum simulation, quantum chaos, machine learning, and energy storage. It provides a clear derivation of the SYK saddle-point equations and gives a valuable cautionary analysis of the Dicke-model battery, demonstrating that a superficially superextensive power can be a normalization artifact. The paper is honest about open problems and states explicitly that no convincing quantum advantage has been achieved to date. The pedagogical value is high for newcomers to the field, and the discussion of the SYK battery is an instructive case study, provided the claims are properly qualified.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 5.3, Eq. (54)] The assertion of a 'genuine' superextensive power scaling P_N ∝ N^{3/2} for the SYK battery is not sufficiently substantiated. In Sec. 5.2 the authors demonstrate that the Dicke model's N^{3/2} scaling is a normalization artifact that disappears after rescaling the light-matter coupling by 1/√N. The SYK claim, attributed to Ref. [81] with numerics up to N = 16, lacks the analogous check: the manuscript does not report the charging-time scaling τ_N ∝ N^{-1/2} implied by E(τ) ∝ N and P = E/τ, nor does it compare alternative normalizations of H_I. Without this, the reader cannot judge whether the superextensivity is robust or a finite-size/normalization artifact of the same kind as in the Dicke case. Please either provide the underlying scaling data from Ref. [81] or explicitly qualify the claim as a finite-size numerical result within the normalization convention of Eq. (50).
  2. [Sec. 5.3] The protocol underlying Eq. (54) is not fully specified. The text does not state whether the power P_N(τ) is maximized over the charging time τ, whether it is averaged over disorder realizations, or whether it refers to a fixed time, and Fig. 5 displays data for a single disorder realization. Because the comparison with the extensive parallel-charging power P ∝ N depends on the definition of P, this ambiguity should be resolved for the scaling claim to be meaningful.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 3] In the paragraph on quantum extreme learning machines, 'the input cane be recovered' should read 'the input can be recovered'.
  2. [Eq. (12b)] The Jordan-Wigner expression for case (ii) is incorrect as written: −σ+_i σ−_j σ+_i σ−_j vanishes identically because σ+_i^2 = 0. It should be −σ+_i σ−_i σ+_j σ−_j, reflecting the density-density term −n_i n_j.
  3. [Sec. 4.3, Eq. (17)] The value S0 ≈ 0.465 is introduced without a citation; it should be attributed to Ref. [67] at its first appearance, since it is a numerical result rather than a derivation.
  4. [Sec. 5.2] The phrase 'one realized a so-called "collective charging"' should be 'one realizes a so-called "collective charging"'.
  5. [Fig. 7 caption] The word 'anologue' should be 'analogue'.
  6. [Sec. 5.3] It would be helpful to state whether the power scaling in Eq. (54) refers to stored energy or extractable work (ergotropy), given the discussion of ergotropy in Sec. 5.1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review delegates quantitative claims to external prior work, and its own Dicke-battery scaling argument is self-contained.

full rationale

This is a review article whose quantitative statements are explicitly delegated to prior published work. The only concrete scaling claim, P_N ∝ N^{3/2} for the SYK battery (Eq. (54)), is attributed to Ref. [81] with the sentence 'Extensive numerical calculations with up to N = 16 spins have shown that a QB based on such SYK charging scheme displays a genuine superextensive scaling of its power output with N [81].' The level-population statement is likewise sourced to Ref. [81]. Ref. [81] is an externally published, falsifiable numerical study; although it shares an author with the present review, neither the review nor the citation chain defines a fitted parameter that is then rediscovered as a prediction. The review's own Dicke-model derivation in Sec. 5.2 is self-contained: it computes E∥_N(τ) ∝ N and P∥_N(τ) ∝ N for parallel charging, then exhibits E⊥_N(τ) ∝ N with P⊥_N(τ) ∝ N^{3/2}, and shows that rescaling the coupling λ by 1/√N restores extensivity and linear power scaling. That argument is an independent mathematical demonstration, not an input recycled as an output. The possible fragility of the SYK N^{3/2} result under normalization changes or at N > 16 is a correctness and robustness concern about the cited numerics, not a circularity in the present paper's reasoning. No self-definitional step, fitted input renamed as prediction, load-bearing self-citation chain, imported uniqueness theorem, ansatz smuggled via citation, or renaming of a known result is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities or fitted parameters. It relies on standard background from quantum many-body physics, including the adiabatic theorem, replica path integrals, and the Jordan-Wigner transformation, all stated in Secs. 2.1, 4.2, and 4.4.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics and second quantization
    Used throughout, e.g., fermionic creation/annihilation operators in Eq. (7) and coherent state path integral in Sec. 4.4.
  • standard math Adiabatic theorem
    Invoked in Sec. 2.1 to justify quantum annealing (Eqs. (1) and (2)).
  • standard math Replica trick and large-N saddle point
    Used in Sec. 4.4 to derive the SYK Green's function equations (Eq. (27)); standard but nontrivial field-theoretic technique.
  • standard math Jordan-Wigner transformation
    Used in Sec. 4.2 to map fermions to spins (Eqs. (11) and (12)).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum simulations of complex systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G25IADKA

@misc{pith2026250520442,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum simulations of complex systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G25IADKA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.20442}
}
read the original abstract

In this review we give a brief overview of quantum simulation as applied to the study of complex systems. In particular, we cover the basic ideas of quantum simulation, neuromorphic computation, the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, as well as applications to quantum batteries.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [81]

    Rossini, D., Andolina, G.M., Rosa, D., Carrega, M., Polini, M.: Quantum advan- tage in the charging process of Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev batteries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 236402 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.236402 40

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.236402 2020

  2. [1]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (10th Anniversary Edition). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976667

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667 2010

  3. [2]

    Science 326, 108 (2009) https://doi

    Buluta, I., Nori, F.: Quantum simulators. Science 326, 108 (2009) https://doi. org/10.1126/science.1177838

    doi:10.1126/science.1177838 2009

  4. [3]

    Nature 464, 45 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature08812

    Ladd, T.D., Jelezko, F., Laflamme, R., Nakamura, Y., Monroe, C., O’Brien, J.L.: Quantum computers. Nature 464, 45 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature08812

    2010

  5. [4]

    Kendon, V.M., Nemoto, K., Munro, W.J.: Quantum analogue computing. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 3609 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0017

    work page arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    Cirac, J.I., Zoller, P.: Goals and opportunities in quantum simulation. Nat. Phys. 8, 264 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2275

    doi:10.1038/nphys2275 2012

  7. [7]

    Hauke, P., Cucchietti, F.M., Tagliacozzo, L., Deutsch, I., Lewenstein, M.: Can one trust quantum simulators? Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 082401 (2012) https://doi. org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/8/082401

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/8/082401 2012

  8. [8]

    Schaetz, T., Monroe, C.R., Esslinger, T.: Focus on quantum simulation. New J. Phys. 15, 085009 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/15/8/085009

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/8/085009 2013

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    Georgescu, I.M., Ashhab, S., Nori, F.: Quantum simulation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.153

    2014 doi

  2. [10]

    Science 357, 995 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal3837 34

    Gross, C., Bloch, I.: Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices. Science 357, 995 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal3837 34

    2017 doi

  3. [11]

    Wendin, G.: Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits: A review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 106001 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ aa7e1a

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., Sciarrino, F.: Photonic quantum information pro- cessing: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 016001 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1361-6633/aad5b2

    2019

  5. [13]

    Bruzewicz, C.D., Chiaverini, J., McConnell, J., Sage, J.M.: Trapped-ion quan- tum computing: Progress and challenges. Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 021314 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5088164

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    Kjaergaard, M., Schwartz, M.E., Braum¨ uller, J., Krantz, P., Wang, J.I.-J., Gustavsson, S., Oliver, W.D.: Superconducting qubits: Current state of play. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 369 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-conmatphys-031119-050605

    2022

  7. [16]

    : Quantum simulators: Architectures and opportunities

    Altman, E., et al. : Quantum simulators: Architectures and opportunities. PRX Quantum 2, 017003 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.017003

    2021 doi

  8. [17]

    Bauer, Z. C. W. Davoudi, Klco, N., Savage, M.J.: Quantum simulation of fun- damental particles and forces. Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 420 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s42254-023-00599-8

    2023 doi

  9. [18]

    PRX Quantum 4, 027001 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.027001

    Bauer, C.W., et al.: Quantum simulation for high-energy physics. PRX Quantum 4, 027001 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.027001

    2023 doi

  10. [19]

    Ramakrishnan, R.K., Ravichandran, A.B., Mishra, A., Kaushalram, A., Hegde, G., Talabattula, S., Rohde, P.P.: Integrated photonic platforms for quantum technology: a review. ISSS J. Micro Smart Syst. 12, 83 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s41683-023-00115-1

    2023 doi

  11. [20]

    Fauseweh, B.: Quantum many-body simulations on digital quantum computers: State-of-the-art and future challenges. Nat. Commun. 15, 2123 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46402-9

    2024 doi

  12. [21]

    Feynman, R.P.: Simulating physics with computers. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21(6), 467 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02650179

    1982 doi

  13. [22]

    Toffoli, T.: Reversible computing. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 85, 632 (1980) https: //doi.org/10.1007/3-540-10003-2 104 35

    1980 doi

  14. [23]

    Benioff, P.: Quantum mechanical models of Turing machines that dissipate no energy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48(23), 1581 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.48.1581

    1982

  15. [24]

    Benioff, P.: Quantum mechanical Hamiltonian models of Turing machines. J. Stat. Phys. 29(3), 515 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01342185

    1982 doi

  16. [25]

    Deutsch, D.: Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 400, 97 (1985) https://doi.org/10. 1098/rspa.1985.0070

    1985

  17. [26]

    Deutsch, D., Ekert, A.: Quantum computation. Phys. World 11, 47 (1998) https: //doi.org/10.1088/2058-7058/11/3/31

    1998 doi

  18. [27]

    Nokkala, J., Galve, F., Roberta Zambrini, S.M., Piilo, J.: Complex quantum net- works as structured environments: engineering and probing. Sci. Rep. 6, 26861 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26861

    2016 doi

  19. [28]

    npj Quantum Inf

    Garc ´ ıa-P´ erez, G., Rossi, M.A.C., Maniscalco, S.: IBM Q experience as a versatile experimental testbed for simulating open quantum systems. npj Quantum Inf. 6, 1 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0235-y

    2020 doi

  20. [29]

    PRX Quantum 4, 040310 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.040310

    Renault, P., Nokkala, J., Roeland, G., Joly, N.Y., Zambrini, R., Maniscalco, S., Piilo, J., Treps, N., Parigi, V.: Experimental optical simulator of reconfigurable and complex quantum environment. PRX Quantum 4, 040310 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.040310

    2023 doi

  21. [30]

    Patsch, S., Maniscalco, S., Koch, C.P.: Simulation of open-quantum-system dynamics using the quantum Zeno effect. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023133 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023133

    2020 doi

  22. [31]

    SciPost Phys

    Magano, D., Moutinho, J., Coutinho, B.: On the quantum simulation of com- plex networks. SciPost Phys. Core 6, 058 (2023) https://doi.org/10.21468/ SciPostPhysCore.6.3.058

    2023

  23. [32]

    Contemporary Physics 44(4), 307–327 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1080/00107151031000110776 https://doi.org/10.1080/00107151031000110776

    Kempe, J.: Quantum random walks: An introductory overview. Contemporary Physics 44(4), 307–327 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1080/00107151031000110776 https://doi.org/10.1080/00107151031000110776

    2003 doi

  24. [33]

    Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    M´ ezard, M., Montanari, A.: Information, Physics, and Computation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/ 9780198570837.001.0001

    2009 doi

  25. [35]

    classical annealing in nonconvex learning problems

    Baldassi, C., Zecchina, R.: Efficiency of quantum vs. classical annealing in nonconvex learning problems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 1457 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711456115

    2018 doi

  26. [36]

    Rajak, A., Suzuki, S., Dutta, A., Chakrabarti, B.K.: Quantum annealing: An overview. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 381, 20210417 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1098/ rsta.2021.0417

    2023

  27. [37]

    https://martinuzzifrancesco.github.io/posts/ a-brief-introduction-to-reservoir-computing/ (2020)

    Martinuzzi, F.: A brief introduction to Reservoir Computing. https://martinuzzifrancesco.github.io/posts/ a-brief-introduction-to-reservoir-computing/ (2020)

    2020

  28. [38]

    Nakajima, K., Fujii, K., Negoro, M., Mitarai, K., Kitagawa, M.: Boosting com- putational power through spatial multiplexing in quantum reservoir computing. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 034021 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied. 11.034021

    2019 doi

  29. [39]

    Mujal, P., Mart ´ ınez-Pe˜ na, R., Nokkala, J., Garc ´ ıa-Beni, J., Giorgi, G.L., Soriano, M.C., Zambrini, R.: Opportunities in quantum reservoir computing and extreme learning machines. Adv. Quantum Technol. 4, 2100027 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1002/qute.202100027

    2021 doi

  30. [40]

    Mart ´ ınez-Pe˜ na, R., Nokkala, J., Giorgi, G.L., Zambrini, R., Soriano, M.C.: Infor- mation processing capacity of spin-based quantum reservoir computing systems. Cogn. Comput. 15, 1140 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-020-09772-y

    2023 doi

  31. [41]

    Com- mun

    Innocenti, L., Lorenzo, S., Palmisano, I., Ferraro, A., Paternostro, M., Palma, G.M.: Potential and limitations of quantum extreme learning machines. Com- mun. Phys. 6, 118 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-023-01233-w

    2023 doi

  32. [42]

    Suprano, A., Zia, D., Innocenti, L., Lorenzo, S., Cimini, V., Giordani, T., Palmisano, I., Polino, E., Spagnolo, N., Sciarrino, F., Palma, G.M., Ferraro, A., Paternostro, M.: Experimental property reconstruction in a photonic quan- tum extreme learning machine. Phys. Rev. Lett...

    2024 doi

  33. [43]

    npj Quantum Information 11(1) (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41534-024-00927-5

    Vetrano, M., Lo Monaco, G., Innocenti, L., Lorenzo, S., Palma, G.M.: State estimation with quantum extreme learning machines beyond the scram- bling time. npj Quantum Information 11(1) (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41534-024-00927-5

    2025

  34. [44]

    Lo Monaco, G., Bertini, M., Lorenzo, S., Palma, G.M.: Quantum extreme learn- ing of molecular potential energy surfaces and force fields. Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 5, 035014 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad6120

    2024 doi

  35. [45]

    Ac ´ ın, A., Cirac, J.I., Lewenstein, M.: Entanglement percolation in quantum networks. Nat. Phys. 3, 256 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys549 37

    2007 doi

  36. [46]

    Cuquet, M., Calsamiglia, J.: Entanglement percolation in quantum com- plex networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 240503 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.103.240503

    2009

  37. [47]

    Perseguers, S., Lewenstein, M., Ac ´ ın, A., Cirac, J.I.: Quantum random networks. Nat. Phys. 6, 539 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1665

    2010 doi

  38. [48]

    Biamonte, J., Faccin, M., De Domenico, M.: Complex networks from clas- sical to quantum. Commun. Phys. 2, 53 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s42005-019-0152-6

    2019

  39. [49]

    Sachdev, S., Ye, J.: Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum Heisenberg magnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1993 (3339) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.70.3339

    1993

  40. [50]

    in Pro- ceedings of KITP, University of California, Santa Barbara, 2015

    Kitaev, A.Y.: Entanglement in strongly correlated quantum matter. in Pro- ceedings of KITP, University of California, Santa Barbara, 2015. Available at: https://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/ and https://online. kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev2/ (2015)

    2015

  41. [51]

    Rosenhaus, V.: An introduction to the SYK model. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52, 323001 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ab2ce1

    2019 doi

  42. [52]

    Chowdhury, D., Georges, A., Parcollet, O., Sachdev, S.: Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev mod- els and beyond: Window into non-Fermi liquids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 035004 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.035004

    2022 doi

  43. [53]

    Sachdev, S.: Quantum statistical mechanics of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model and charged black holes. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 38, 2430003 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1142/S0217979224300032

    2024 doi

  44. [54]

    Garc ´ ıa-´Alvarez, L., Egusquiza, I.L., Lamata, L., Campo, A., Sonner, J., Solano, E.: Digital quantum simulation of minimal AdS/CFT. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 040501 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.040501

    2017 doi

  45. [55]

    Danshita, I., Hanada, M., Tezuka, M.: Creating and probing the Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev model with ultracold gases: Towards experimental stud- ies of quantum gravity. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2017, 083101 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptx108

    2017 doi

  46. [56]

    Wei, C., Sedrakyan, T.A.: Optical lattice platform for the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model. Phys. Rev. A 103, 013323 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA. 103.013323

    2021 doi

  47. [57]

    Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11343 (2023) 38

    Uhrich, P., Bandyopadhyay, S., Sauerwein, N., Sonner, J., Brantut, J.-P., Hauke, P.: A cavity quantum electrodynamics implementation of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11343 (2023) 38

    2023 arXiv

  48. [58]

    Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.17802 (2024)

    Baumgartner, R., Pelliconi, P., Bandyopadhyay, S., Orsi, F., Sauerwein, N., Hauke, P., Brantut, J.-P., Sonner, J.: Quantum simulation of the Sachdev-Ye- Kitaev model using time-dependent disorder in optical cavities. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.17802 (2024)

    2024

  49. [59]

    Pikulin, D.I., Franz, M.: Black hole on a chip: Proposal for a physical realization of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model in a solid-state system. Phys. Rev. X 7, 031006 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031006

    2017 doi

  50. [60]

    Chew, A., Essin, A., Alicea, J.: Approximating the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model with Majorana wires. Phys. Rev. B 96, 121119 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.96.121119

    2017

  51. [61]

    Chen, A., Ilan, R., Juan, F., Pikulin, D.I., Franz, M.: Quantum holography in a graphene flake with an irregular boundary. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 036403 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.036403

    2018 doi

  52. [62]

    Brzezi´ nska, M., Guan, Y., Yazyev, O.V., Sachdev, S., Kruchkov, A.: Engineering SYK interactions in disordered graphene flakes under realistic experimen- tal conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 036503 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.131.036503

    2023

  53. [63]

    npj Quantum Inf

    Luo, Z., You, Y.-Z., Li, J., Jian, C.-M., Lu, D., Xu, C., Zeng, B., Laflamme, R.: Quantum simulation of the non-fermi-liquid state of Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model. npj Quantum Inf. 5, 53 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0166-7

    2019 doi

  54. [64]

    Babbush, R., Berry, D.W., Neven, H.: Quantum simulation of the Sachdev- Ye-Kitaev model by asymmetric qubitization. Phys. Rev. A 99, 040301 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.040301

    2019 doi

  55. [65]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Giuliani, G., Vignale, G.: Quantum Theory of the Electron Liquid. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511619915

    2005

  56. [66]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Altland, A., Simons, B.D.: Condensed Matter Field Theory, 2nd Ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511789984

    2010

  57. [67]

    Fu, W., Sachdev, S.: Numerical study of fermion and boson models with infinite- range random interactions. Phys. Rev. B 94, 035135 (2016) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.94.035135

    2016

  58. [68]

    Eisert, J., Cramer, M., Plenio, M.B.: Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy. Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 277 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys. 82.277

    2010 doi

  59. [69]

    Maldacena, J., Shenker, S.H., Stanford, D.: A bound on chaos. J. High Energ. 39 Phys. 2016, 106 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2016)106

    2016 doi

  60. [70]

    Larkin, A., Ovchinnikov, Y.N.: Quasiclassical method in the theory of supercon- ductivity. Sov. Phys. JETP 28, 1200 (1969)

    1969

  61. [71]

    Cotler, J.S., Ding, D., Penington, G.R.: Out-of-time-order operators and the butterfly effect. Ann. Phys. 396, 318 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2018. 07.020

    2018 doi

  62. [72]

    Roberts, D.A., Stanford, D., Streicher, A.: Operator growth in the SYK model. J. High Energ. Phys. 2018, 122 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2018)122

    2018 doi

  63. [73]

    Kobrin, B., Yang, Z., Kahanamoku-Meyer, G.D., Olund, C.T., Moore, J.E., Stanford, D., Yao, N.Y.: Many-body chaos in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 030602 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126. 030602

    2021 doi

  64. [74]

    Quach, J.Q., Cerullo, G., Virgili, T.: Quantum batteries: The future of energy storage? Joule 7, 2195 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2023.09.003

    2023 doi

  65. [75]

    Alicki, R., Fannes, M.: Entanglement boost for extractable work from ensembles of quantum batteries. Phys. Rev. E 87, 042123 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevE.87.042123

    2013

  66. [76]

    Hovhannisyan, K.V., Perarnau-Llobet, M., Huber, M., Ac ´ ın, A.: Entanglement generation is not necessary for optimal work extraction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240401 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.240401

    2013 doi

  67. [77]

    Europhys

    Allahverdyan, A.E., Balian, R., Nieuwenhuizen, T.M.: Maximal work extraction from finite quantum systems. Europhys. Lett. 67, 565 (2004) https://doi.org/ 10.1209/epl/i2004-10101-2

    2004 doi

  68. [78]

    Campaioli, F., Gherardini, S., Quach, J.Q., Polini, M., Andolina, G.M.: Collo- quium: Quantum batteries. Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 031001 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/RevModPhys.96.031001

    2024 doi

  69. [79]

    Ferraro, D., Campisi, M., Andolina, G.M., Pellegrini, V., Polini, M.: High-power collective charging of a solid-state quantum battery. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 117702 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.117702

    2018 doi

  70. [80]

    Juli` a-Farr´ e, S., Salamon, T., Riera, A., Bera, M.N., Lewenstein, M.: Bounds on the capacity and power of quantum batteries. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023113 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023113

    2020 doi

  71. [82]

    Rosa, D., Rossini, D., Andolina, G.M., Polini, M., Carrega, M.: Ultra stable charging of fast-scrambling SYK quantum batteries. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 67 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2020)067

    2020 doi

  72. [83]

    Nature549, 203 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23458

    Harrow, A.W., Montanaro, A.: Quantum computational supremacy. Nature549, 203 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23458

    2017 doi

  73. [84]

    Nature607, 667 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04940-6

    Daley, A.J., Bloch, I., Kokail, C., Flannigan, S., Pearson, N., Troyer, M., Zoller, P.: Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation. Nature607, 667 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04940-6

    2022 doi

  74. [85]

    Fortschr

    DiVincenzo, D.: The physical implementation of quantum computation. Fortschr. Phys. 48, 771 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3978(200009)48: 9/11⟨771::AID-PROP771⟩3.0.CO;2-E

    2000 doi

  75. [86]

    Monroe, C., Meekhof, D.M., King, B.E., Itano, W.M., Wineland, D.J.: Demon- stration of a fundamental quantum logic gate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4714 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4714

    1995 doi

  76. [87]

    Jones, J.A., Mosca, M.: Implementation of a quantum algorithm on a nuclear magnetic resonance quantum computer. J. Chem. Phys. 109, 1648 (1998) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.476739

    1998 doi

  77. [88]

    Cirac, J.I., Zoller, P.: Quantum computations with cold trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4091

    1995 doi

  78. [89]

    Los Alamos Science 27, 264 (2002)

    Holzscheiter, M.H.: Ion-trap quantum computation. Los Alamos Science 27, 264 (2002)

    2002

  79. [90]

    Nature 627, 510 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-024-07111-x

    Jain, S., S¨ agesser, T., Hrmo, P., Torkzaban, C., Stadler, M., Oswald, R., Axline, C., Bautista-Salvador, A., Ospelkaus, C., Kienzler, D., Home, J.: Penning micro- trap for quantum computing. Nature 627, 510 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-024-07111-x

    2024

  80. [91]

    Science 351, 1068 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad948

    Monz, T., Nigg, D., Martinez, E.A., Brandl, M.F., Schindler, P., Rines, R., Wang, S.X., Chuang, I.L., Blatt, R.: Realization of a scalable Shor algorithm. Science 351, 1068 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad948

    2016 doi

  81. [92]

    : A race-track trapped-ion quantum processor

    Moses, S.A., et al. : A race-track trapped-ion quantum processor. Phys. Rev. X 13, 041052 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041052

    2023 doi

  82. [93]

    Nature 534, 516 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18318

    Martinez, E.A., Muschik, C.A., Schindler, P., Nigg, D., Erhard, A., Heyl, M., Hauke, P., Dalmonte, M., Monz, T., Zoller, P., Blatt, R.: Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer. Nature 534, 516 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18318

    2016 doi

  83. [94]

    Il Nuovo Saggiatore 32, 37 (2016) 41

    Morsch, O.: Rydberg renaissance. Il Nuovo Saggiatore 32, 37 (2016) 41

    2016

  84. [95]

    Europhys

    Lahaye, T., Barredo, D.: Quantum simulation and computing with arrays of single Rydberg atoms. Europhys. News 53, 28 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1051/ epn/2022406

    2022

  85. [96]

    Pesce, G., Jones, P.H., Marag` o, O.M., Volpe, G.: Optical tweezers: theory and practice. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 153, 949 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/ s13360-020-00843-5

    2020 doi

  86. [97]

    A VS Quantum Sci.3, 023501 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1116/ 5.0036562

    Morgado, M., Whitlock, S.: Quantum simulation and computing with Rydberg- interacting qubits. A VS Quantum Sci.3, 023501 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1116/ 5.0036562

    2021

  87. [98]

    Science 374, 1242 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi8794

    Semeghini, G., Levine, H., Keesling, A., Ebadi, S., Wang, T.T., Bluvstein, D., Verresen, R., Pichler, H., Kalinowski, M., Samajdar, R., Omran, A., Sachdev, S., Vishwanath, A., Greiner, M., Vuletic, V., Lukin, M.D.: Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum sim...

    2021 doi

  88. [99]

    Krantz, P., Kjaergaard, M., Yan, F., Orlando, T.P., Gustavsson, S., Oliver, W.D.: A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits. Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 021318 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5089550

    2019 doi

  89. [100]

    https://quantum.ibm.com/

  90. [101]

    Xu, K., Sun, Z.-H., Liu, W., Zhang, Y.-R., Li, H., Dong, H., Ren, W., Zhang, P., Nori, F., Zheng, D., Fan, H., Wang, H.: Probing dynamical phase transitions with a superconducting quantum simulator. Sci. Adv. 6, 4935 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba4935

    2020 doi

  91. [102]

    : Strongly correlated quantum walks with a 12-qubit super- conducting processor

    Yan, Z., et al. : Strongly correlated quantum walks with a 12-qubit super- conducting processor. Science 364, 753 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1126/science. aaw1611

    2019 doi

  92. [103]

    : Phase transitions in a programmable quantum spin glass simulator

    Harris, R., et al. : Phase transitions in a programmable quantum spin glass simulator. Science 361, 162 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat2025

    2018 doi

  93. [104]

    : Observation of topological phenomena in a programmable lattice of 1,800 qubits

    King, A.D., et al. : Observation of topological phenomena in a programmable lattice of 1,800 qubits. Nature 560, 456 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-018-0410-x

    2018

  94. [105]

    Couteau, C., Barz, S., Durt, T., Gerrits, T., Huwer, J., Prevedel, R., Rarity, J., Shields, A., Weihs, G.: Applications of single photons to quantum communi- cation and computing. Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 326 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s42254-023-00583-2

    2023

  95. [106]

    Nature 409, 46 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1038/ 42 35051009

    Knill, E., Laflamme, R., Milburn, G.J.: A scheme for efficient quantum com- putation with linear optics. Nature 409, 46 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1038/ 42 35051009

    2001

  96. [107]

    Childs, A.M.: Universal computation by quantum walk. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 180501 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.180501

    2009 doi

  97. [108]

    Bromberg, Y., Lahini, Y., Morandotti, R., Silberberg, Y.: Quantum and classical correlations in waveguide lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 253904 (2009) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.253904

    2009 doi

  98. [109]

    Nature 638, 872 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ d41586-025-00527-z

    Castelvecchi, D.: Microsoft claims quantum-computing breakthrough — but some physicists are sceptical. Nature 638, 872 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ d41586-025-00527-z

    2025

  99. [110]

    Nature 638, 651 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-024-08445-2 43

    Microsoft Azure Quantum: Interferometric single-shot parity measurement in inas–al hybrid devices. Nature 638, 651 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-024-08445-2 43

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.