REVIEW 1 cited by
Instruction-tuned Large Language Models for Machine Translation in the Medical Domain
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising results on machine translation for high resource language pairs and domains. However, in specialised domains (e.g. medical) LLMs have shown lower performance compared to standard neural machine translation models. The consistency in the machine translation of terminology is crucial for users, researchers, and translators in specialised domains. In this study, we compare the performance between baseline LLMs and instruction-tuned LLMs in the medical domain. In addition, we introduce terminology from specialised medical dictionaries into the instruction formatted datasets for fine-tuning LLMs. The instruction-tuned LLMs significantly outperform the baseline models with automatic metrics.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Comparing Large Language Models and Traditional Machine Translation Tools for Translating Medical Consultation Summaries: A Pilot Study
In a 34-translation pilot, Google Translate, Bing, and DeepL generally beat GPT-4o, LLAMA-3.1, and GEMMA-2 on BLEU, CHR-F, and METEOR for medical consultation summaries, with LLMs strongest for Vietnamese and Chinese ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.