REVIEW 2 cited by
Taking Advantage of Sparsity in Multi-Task Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We study the problem of estimating multiple linear regression equations for the purpose of both prediction and variable selection. Following recent work on multi-task learning Argyriou et al. [2008], we assume that the regression vectors share the same sparsity pattern. This means that the set of relevant predictor variables is the same across the different equations. This assumption leads us to consider the Group Lasso as a candidate estimation method. We show that this estimator enjoys nice sparsity oracle inequalities and variable selection properties. The results hold under a certain restricted eigenvalue condition and a coherence condition on the design matrix, which naturally extend recent work in Bickel et al. [2007], Lounici [2008]. In particular, in the multi-task learning scenario, in which the number of tasks can grow, we are able to remove completely the effect of the number of predictor variables in the bounds. Finally, we show how our results can be extended to more general noise distributions, of which we only require the variance to be finite.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Deep Multitask Learning for Mixed-Type Outcomes with Shared Sparsity
A multitask deep NN with shared sparsity and rank-based criterion for mixed-type outcomes establishes nonasymptotic excess-risk bounds and variable-selection consistency, with applications to gene-expression data.
-
Quadratic Surface Support Vector Machine with L1 Norm Regularization
L1-regularized quadratic-surface SVMs are convex with unique generic solutions and provably reduce to standard SVMs on linearly separable data, but their advertised sparse-pattern recovery is not rigorously established.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.