REVIEW 2 cited by
Wasserstein Fair Classification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We propose an approach to fair classification that enforces independence between the classifier outputs and sensitive information by minimizing Wasserstein-1 distances. The approach has desirable theoretical properties and is robust to specific choices of the threshold used to obtain class predictions from model outputs. We introduce different methods that enable hiding sensitive information at test time or have a simple and fast implementation. We show empirical performance against different fairness baselines on several benchmark fairness datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Debias-CLR: A Contrastive Learning Based Debiasing Method for Algorithmic Fairness in Healthcare Applications
Debias-CLR uses contrastive learning with class-average counterfactual examples to reduce gender and ethnicity bias in clinical text and vital-sign embeddings, as measured by a modified SC-WEAT score.
-
Fairness in Deep Learning: A Computational Perspective
A review of deep learning fairness that maps bias sources and mitigation methods across data, training, and inference stages, with a focus on interpretability-driven detection.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.