Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Exploring the lifetime frontier with a beam-dump experiment at CiADS

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A beam-dump detector at CiADS could exclude dark photons at kinetic mixing an order of magnitude below current bounds.

desk verdict A transparent, well-structured sensitivity study for dark photons at CiADS and HIAF; the reach claim leans on a borrowed background estimate, but the paper is honest about it and the projections are worth taking seriously. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.09132 v2 pith:G3PKARCU submitted 2024-12-12 hep-ph hep-ex

Liangwen Chen , Mingxuan Du , Zhiyu Sun , Zeren Simon Wang , Fang Xie , Ju-Jun Xie , Lei Yang , Pei Yu
show 1 more author
Yu Zhang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords beam-dumpexperimentlong-livedparticlesdarkphotonkineticmixingprotonbremsstrahlungCiADSHIAFintensityfrontier
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes adding a small, low-cost beam-dump detector to the CiADS accelerator facility in China, where a high-intensity proton beam already has to be dumped during commissioning. It argues that this detector, placed 10 m behind an oxygen-free copper dump and run for five years, could probe dark photons in a mass range around 100 to 800 MeV with kinetic mixing as small as $10^{-9}$ to $10^{-8}$. The sensitivity comes from the huge number of protons on target and the strong forward boost of mesons and bremsstrahlung-produced dark photons. The authors show that a 2 GeV proton beam operating for five years could exclude kinetic-mixing values about one order of magnitude below the current E137 and $\nu$-Cal bounds for dark-photon masses between roughly 120 and 800 MeV. If correct, this would make CiADS-BDE one of the few experiments probing new, currently uncharted dark-photon parameter space at the intensity frontier.

What carries the argument

The engine of the proposal is the combination of a high-intensity, relatively low-energy proton beam and the forward boost of its collision products: pions and $\eta$ mesons produced in the copper dump decay to a photon plus a dark photon, and proton-copper bremsstrahlung produces dark photons directly; all of these inherit a strong forward momentum and can decay to $e^+e^-$ inside a detector placed 10 m behind the dump. The computation relies on a proton-bremsstrahlung splitting kernel valid at any beam energy and full angles (from Ref. [66]), vector-meson-dominance form factors for the off-shell proton, GEANT4-derived meson fragmentation factors per proton on target, and the standard kinetic-mixing branching ratios for $\pi^0/\eta \to \gamma\gamma'$. Backgrounds are controlled by the same lepton-energy (above 17 MeV) and opening-angle (above 15 degrees) cuts used in a similar detector proposal, whose estimated rate of $100 \pm 50$ events per year is adopted as a conservative figure.

What would settle it

Operate a prototype liquid-scintillator detector with the same fiducial volume and the same 17 MeV and 15-degree cuts behind the CiADS dump with the proton beam on, and count electron-positron-like events; if the measured background rate substantially exceeds about 100 events per year, the 90% C.L. contours in the paper's Fig. 4 shift upward in epsilon and the claimed exclusion below the E137 and nu-Cal bounds no longer holds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that a beam-dump experiment at CiADS, without any dedicated proton beam, can probe dark photons in a region of the $(m_{\gamma'}, \epsilon)$ plane that no current experiment excludes. Using a 2 GeV, 5 mA proton beam with $6.6 \times 10^{23}$ protons on target per year, five years of operation, and a 1 m radius liquid-scintillator detector 10 m behind a copper dump, the 90% C.L. sensitivity reaches $\epsilon$ values roughly one order of magnitude below the E137 and $\nu$-Cal bounds for dark-photon masses between about 120 MeV and 800 MeV. The new reach is driven by $\eta \to \gamma \gamma'$ decays and proton bremsstrahlung, which dominate for these masses. With a 600 MeV beam the experiment cannot beat existing bounds, and at HIAF with a 9.3 GeV beam it extends to heavier masses above 1 GeV but does not reach lower $\epsilon$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the beam-dump background at CiADS will be close to the 100 plus-or-minus-50 events per year adopted from a similar detector proposal, despite different beam energy, duty cycle, dump geometry, and shielding; if the real rate is much higher, the claimed new parameter regions shrink or vanish.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With five years of 2 GeV beam operation, CiADS-BDE can exclude dark-photon kinetic mixing $\epsilon$ down to about $10^{-9}$ to $10^{-8}$ for masses between roughly 120 MeV and 800 MeV, about an order of magnitude below the current E137 and $\nu$-Cal bounds.
  • The dominant production channels for the new reach are $\eta$ decays and proton bremsstrahlung; $\pi^0$ decays alone cannot beat existing limits at 2 GeV.
  • The 600 MeV CiADS beam, despite its high rate, does not probe new dark-photon parameter space under the conservative background assumption; it only does so if the background is negligible.
  • A similar detector behind the HIAF 9.3 GeV beam reaches heavier dark photons, above 1 GeV, with $\epsilon$ of order $10^{-8}$ to $10^{-7}$.
  • The experiment can be realized without a dedicated beam and with minimal detector instrumentation, so it is relatively inexpensive for the reach it offers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the same forward-boost geometry and 10 m baseline could be applied to other long-lived-particle signatures, such as axion-like particles, heavy neutral leptons, or millicharged particles, and the paper explicitly invites such studies.
  • Editorial extension: the sensitivity estimates scale roughly with background; if beam-on backgrounds at CiADS turn out to be dominated by neutrino interactions rather than misreconstruction, the open space between dump and detector could be used for additional shielding or veto layers to preserve the reach.
  • Editorial extension: a testable extension would be to scan the detector distance and radius, since the acceptance formula shows a trade-off between solid angle and decay probability; a closer or larger detector might push the reach to smaller $\epsilon$ at the cost of higher background.
  • Editorial extension: because the paper's background estimate is imported from a different facility, the first physics run should be treated as a background-measurement campaign before claiming exclusions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a beam-dump experiment at the China initiative Accelerator Driven System (CiADS-BDE), located at an existing high-power beam dump, and studies its sensitivity to long-lived dark photons produced in meson decays and proton bremsstrahlung. The detector is a cylindrical liquid-scintillator volume placed 10 m behind the dump, with radius 0.1 m or 1 m and length 1 m. For a 5-year operation with 2 GeV protons, the paper claims that the experiment can exclude kinetic mixing values about an order of magnitude below current E137 and ν-Cal bounds for dark-photon masses between roughly 120 MeV and 800 MeV, and that a similar setup at HIAF could probe masses beyond 1 GeV. The signal calculations use published branching-ratio formulas, GEANT4-based meson fragmentation factors, and a recently proposed proton-bremsstrahlung splitting kernel.

Significance. If the sensitivity projections are correct, the CiADS-BDE would provide a low-cost probe of a currently unexplored dark-photon parameter region, complementing higher-energy proposals such as SHiP. The paper's signal calculation is generally careful: the meson-decay channel is documented with explicit formulas and Monte Carlo acceptances, the proton-bremsstrahlung channel uses a published kernel that is appropriate at low beam energies, and the comparison of two detector radii and three beam energies is informative. The authors also transparently identify the background estimate and the physics-list dependence as the main uncertainties. However, the central reach claim currently rests on an externally transferred background estimate from SHiNESS and on an acknowledged but unpropagated 50% systematic in meson multiplicities; these prevent the main conclusion from being fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2 (background estimate)] The central reach claim in Fig. 4 (upper right panel) relies on transferring the SHiNESS background estimate of 61±31 events/year to the CiADS-BDE, rounded to 100±50 events/year and integrated over 5 years to set a 90% C.L. limit corresponding to about 184 signal events. However, the CiADS-BDE differs from SHiNESS in beam energy (600 MeV or 2 GeV), dump material (oxygen-free copper versus tungsten), duty cycle, shielding geometry (about 7 m of concrete), and detector placement. The background sources named in Sec. 2 (cosmic rays, neutrino charged-current and neutral-current interactions, and the beam anti-neutrino component) depend on the neutrino flux and angular distribution, which scale nontrivially with beam energy and dump composition. The paper mentions preliminary GEANT4 simulations showing no large discrepancy in the misreconstruction rate, but no simulation results or quantitative comparisons are presented. If the actual background rate at CiADS-BDE is substantially above 100 events/year, the 90% C.L. contours shift upward in epsilon and the claimed new parameter regions between about 120 MeV and 800 MeV could disappear. A dedicated background simulation for the proposed geometry and beam parameters, or a conservative propagation of the background uncertainty into the sensitivity contours, is needed before this claim can be supported.
  2. [Sec. 4.1, Table 2] The fragmentation factors f_pi0 and f_eta are derived from GEANT4 simulations with the QGSP_BIC_HP physics list, and the authors state that the choice of physics list affects the meson production rates by up to about 50% but do not take this uncertainty into account in the computation. Because the signal-event number in Eq. (4.1) is linear in f_pi0/eta, a 50% uncertainty translates into an approximately 22% shift in the excluded value of epsilon (since signals scale as epsilon^2). This systematic is comparable to the width of the claimed new parameter band in Fig. 4 and should be propagated or shown to be negligible for the conclusion.
  3. [Sec. 3.1.2, Eq. (3.6)] The off-shell form factor F* in Eq. (3.6) contains a hard cutoff Lambda fixed at 1.5 GeV following Ref. [64], but the paper does not examine the sensitivity of the proton-bremsstrahlung reach to this choice. Since PB is one of the two channels responsible for the claimed new sensitivity above approximately 400 MeV (Sec. 5), a variation of Lambda (e.g., 1–2 GeV) could materially change the PB signal rate and hence the exclusion contours in Fig. 4. A simple scan over Lambda would suffice to establish robustness.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 1] The facility name 'China initiative Accelerator Driven System' should be 'China Initiative Accelerator Driven System' with a capital 'I' in 'Initiative'.
  2. [Table 1] The entry '500/600 MeV @ 0.5 mA' and '500/600 MeV @ 5 mA' is ambiguous; the text focuses on 600 MeV. Please clarify whether 500 MeV is a separate configuration or an alternative design.
  3. [Sec. 4.1] The symbol epsilon is used both for the kinetic-mixing parameter in Eq. (3.1) and for the acceptance efficiencies in Eqs. (4.2)–(4.4). This double use is confusing; consider using a different symbol (e.g., a) for the efficiencies.
  4. [Sec. 5] The phrase 'a smaller corner extruding the present bounds' should likely be 'protruding' or 'exceeding'.
  5. [References] References [24] and [25] lack titles and journal information; they should be completed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the PB splitting kernel from Ref. [66] is a parameter-free published input, not fitted to the sensitivity target, and the background transfer from SHiNESS is an external assumption rather than a reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Meson-decay production uses standard branching-ratio formulas (Eqs. 3.2-3.3), fragmentation factors fπ0/fη from independent GEANT4 simulations (Sec. 4.1), and Monte-Carlo acceptance/decay probabilities (Eqs. 4.2-4.4). Proton-bremsstrahlung production uses the published splitting kernel of Ref. [66] (Eq. 3.7), with vector-meson-dominance form factors from Ref. [68] and an off-shell form factor from Refs. [64,69]; no parameter is fitted to the dark-photon sensitivity reach. The decay widths are standard (Eqs. 3.9-3.10). The background level is imported from SHiNESS (Ref. [54]) and enlarged to a conservative 100±50/yr; this is a projective external assumption and a correctness risk given different beam energies and geometry, but it is not equivalent to the signal prediction by construction. The only self-citation, Ref. [66] for the PB kernel, involves co-author M. Du, but that work is a general parameter-free method for proton-bremsstrahlung emission and is not a self-referential ansatz adopted solely to force the CiADS-BDE sensitivity; therefore it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces; the dark photon is a standard BSM benchmark. The central calculation rests on simulation-derived meson multiplicities, a published proton-bremsstrahlung kernel (partly by a co-author), and a borrowed background rate. These are assumptions rather than circular fits, but the background rate and the 50% simulation systematic are the least externally anchored inputs.

free parameters (3)
  • Background event rate N_bkg = 100 +/- 50 per year
    Assumed conservatively from SHiNESS (Ref [54]) instead of measuring the CiADS environment; directly sets the 90% C.L. exclusion threshold of about 184 signal events over 5 years.
  • Hard cutoff Lambda in off-shell form factor = 1.5 GeV
    Adopted from Ref [64]; scales the proton-bremsstrahlung cross section and affects the PB sensitivity reach.
  • Meson fragmentation factors f_pi0, f_eta = See Table 2 (e.g., f_pi0 = 0.034, 0.713, 3.76 for 0.6, 2, 9.3 GeV; f_eta = 0, 0.023, 0.129)
    Simulation-derived inputs from GEANT4 that determine the meson-decay signal yield; the physics-list choice introduces a 50% systematic uncertainty that is not propagated.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The SHiNESS background estimate and suppression cuts transfer to CiADS-BDE and HIAF-BDE despite different beam energy, duty factor, and shielding geometry.
    Stated in Sec. 2; no dedicated background simulation for the proposed site is presented.
  • standard math The proton-bremsstrahlung splitting kernel of Ref [66] is valid for low-energy proton beams and full angles.
    Imported as Eq. (3.7); the authors argue it improves on the Fermi-Weizsacker-Williams approximation.
  • domain assumption Only pi0 and eta decays plus proton bremsstrahlung contribute significantly; vector-meson mixing, Drell-Yan, and electromagnetic cascade contributions are negligible or already excluded in the parameter range of interest.
    Footnote in Sec. 3.1.1; this selection defines the signal model for the sensitivity evaluation.
  • domain assumption GEANT4 with physics list QGSP_BIC_HP accurately models pion and eta production in the copper target.
    Sec. 4.1; the authors note up to 50% variation with alternative physics lists, which is not propagated into the results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring the lifetime frontier with a beam-dump experiment at CiADS." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G3PKARCU

@misc{pith2026241209132,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring the lifetime frontier with a beam-dump experiment at CiADS},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G3PKARCU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.09132}
}
abstract

We propose a beam-dump experiment (BDE) at the upcoming facility of China initiative Accelerator Driven System (CiADS), called CiADS-BDE, in order to search for long-lived particles (LLPs) predicted in various beyond-the-Standard-Model (BSM) theories. The experiment is to be located in the forward direction of the incoming low-energy proton beam at CiADS, leveraging the strong forward boost of the produced particles at the beam dump in general. The space between the dump and the detector is largely available, allowing for installation of shielding and veto materials and hence low levels of background events. We elaborate on the detector setup, and choose dark photon as a benchmark model for sensitivity study. We restrict ourselves to the signature of an electron-positron pair and perform detailed background estimates. We find that with 5 years' operation, unique, currently unexcluded parts of the parameter space for $\mathcal{O}(100)$~MeV dark-photon masses and $\mathcal{O}(10^{-9}\text{--}10^{-8})$ kinetic mixing can be probed at the CiADS-BDE. Furthermore, considering that there is no need to set up a proton beam specifically for this experiment and that the detector system requires minimal instrumentation, the experiment is supposed to be relatively cost-effective. Therefore, we intend this work to promote studies on the sensitivity reach of the proposed experiment to additional LLP scenarios, and in the end, the realization of the experiment. Incidentally, we study the sensitivity of the same BDE setups at the High Intensity Heavy-ion Accelerator Facility (HIAF), presently in operation near the CiADS program site, and conclude that HIAF-BDE could probe new parameter regions, too.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Searching for long-lived particles from stopped pions and muons at the CiADS-BDE

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Projected 5-year sensitivity of the proposed CiADS-BDE shows reach beyond current bounds for HNLs, electrophilic and LFV ALPs, and RPV light binos.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [54]

    SHiNESS Collaboration, S. R. Soleti, P. Coloma, J. J. G´ omez Cadenas, and A. Cabrera, Search for hidden neutrinos at the European Spallation Source: the SHiNESS experiment, JHEP 03 (2024) 148, [ arXiv:2311.18509]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [64]

    Foroughi-Abari and A

    S. Foroughi-Abari and A. Ritz, Dark sector production via proton bremsstrahlung , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 9 095045, [ arXiv:2108.05900]

    arXiv 2022

  3. [1]

    Liu, Z.-J

    S.-H. Liu, Z.-J. Wang, H. Jia, Y. He, W.-P. Dou, Y.-S. Qin, W.-L. Chen, and F. Yan, Physics design of the ciads 25 mev demo facility , Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 843 (2017) 11–17

    work page 2017

  4. [2]

    S. Liu, W. Chen, W. Dou, Y. He, H. Jia, Y. Qin, Z. Wang, and H. Zhao, Commissioning of China ADS Demo Linac and Baseline Design of CiADS Project ,

    work page

  5. [3]

    Z. Wang, Y. He, G. Huang, S. Liu, T. Tan, Y. Wan, F. Wang, and W. Yue, The Status of CiADS Superconducting LINAC , in 10th International Particle Accelerator Conference, p. MOPTS059, 2019

    work page 2019

  6. [4]

    Liu et al., Physics design of the superconducting section of the CiADS linac , Int

    S. Liu et al., Physics design of the superconducting section of the CiADS linac , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34 (2019), no. 29 1950178

    work page 2019

  7. [5]

    Y. He, H. Jia, H.-J. Cai, Z. Wang, W. Dou, J. Wu, Y. Chen, G. Huang, C. Y. J. Wong, and H. Zhao, Accelerator driven system – a solution to multiple problems of society, JACoW IP AC2023(2023) FRYG2. – 17 –

    work page 2023

  8. [6]

    Cai et al., Towards a high-intensity muon source , Phys

    H.-J. Cai et al., Towards a high-intensity muon source , Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 27 (2024), no. 2 023403, [ arXiv:2309.01520]

    arXiv 2024

Show all 75 references
  1. [7]

    Wang et al., Beam physics design of a superconducting linac , Phys

    Z.-J. Wang et al., Beam physics design of a superconducting linac , Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 27 (2024), no. 1 010101

    2024

  2. [8]

    Alimena et al., Searching for long-lived particles beyond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider , J

    J. Alimena et al., Searching for long-lived particles beyond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider , J. Phys. G 47 (2020), no. 9 090501, [ arXiv:1903.04497]

    2020

  3. [9]

    L. Lee, C. Ohm, A. Soffer, and T.-T. Yu, Collider Searches for Long-Lived Particles Beyond the Standard Model , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 106 (2019) 210–255, [arXiv:1810.12602]. [Erratum: Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys. 122, 103912 (2022)]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Curtin et al., Long-Lived Particles at the Energy Frontier: The MATHUSLA Physics Case , Rept

    D. Curtin et al., Long-Lived Particles at the Energy Frontier: The MATHUSLA Physics Case , Rept. Prog. Phys. 82 (2019), no. 11 116201, [ arXiv:1806.07396]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Beacham et al., Physics Beyond Colliders at CERN: Beyond the Standard Model Working Group Report, J

    J. Beacham et al., Physics Beyond Colliders at CERN: Beyond the Standard Model Working Group Report, J. Phys. G 47 (2020), no. 1 010501, [ arXiv:1901.09966]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [12]

    J. L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling, and S. Trojanowski, ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 3 035001, [ arXiv:1708.09389]

    2018 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Ariga et al., F ASER’s physics reach for long-lived particles, Phys

    F ASERCollaboration, A. Ariga et al., F ASER’s physics reach for long-lived particles, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 9 095011, [ arXiv:1811.12522]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Cerci et al., F ACET: A new long-lived particle detector in the very forward region of the CMS experiment , JHEP 06 (2022) 110, [ arXiv:2201.00019]

    S. Cerci et al., F ACET: A new long-lived particle detector in the very forward region of the CMS experiment , JHEP 06 (2022) 110, [ arXiv:2201.00019]

    2022

  9. [15]

    Anelli et al., A facility to Search for Hidden Particles (SHiP) at the CERN SPS , arXiv:1504.04956

    SHiP Collaboration, M. Anelli et al., A facility to Search for Hidden Particles (SHiP) at the CERN SPS , arXiv:1504.04956

    arXiv

  10. [16]

    Alekhin et al., A facility to Search for Hidden Particles at the CERN SPS: the SHiP physics case , Rept

    S. Alekhin et al., A facility to Search for Hidden Particles at the CERN SPS: the SHiP physics case , Rept. Prog. Phys. 79 (2016), no. 12 124201, [ arXiv:1504.04855]

    2016 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Ahdida et al., The SHiP experiment at the proposed CERN SPS Beam Dump Facility , Eur

    SHiP Collaboration, C. Ahdida et al., The SHiP experiment at the proposed CERN SPS Beam Dump Facility , Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022), no. 5 486, [arXiv:2112.01487]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Albanese et al., BDF/SHiP at the ECN3 high-intensity beam facility, tech

    SHiP Collaboration, R. Albanese et al., BDF/SHiP at the ECN3 high-intensity beam facility, tech. rep., CERN, Geneva, 2023, CERN-SPSC-2023-033, SPSC-P-369

    2023

  13. [19]

    L. B. Okun, LIMITS OF ELECTRODYNAMICS: PARAPHOTONS? , Sov. Phys. JETP 56 (1982) 502

    1982

  14. [20]

    Galison and A

    P. Galison and A. Manohar, TWO Z’s OR NOT TWO Z’s? , Phys. Lett. B 136 (1984) 279–283

    1984

  15. [21]

    Holdom, Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts , Phys

    B. Holdom, Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts , Phys. Lett. B 166 (1986) 196–198

    1986

  16. [22]

    Boehm and P

    C. Boehm and P. Fayet, Scalar dark matter candidates , Nucl. Phys. B 683 (2004) 219–263, [hep-ph/0305261]

    2004 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Pospelov, Secluded U(1) below the weak scale , Phys

    M. Pospelov, Secluded U(1) below the weak scale , Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 095002, [arXiv:0811.1030]. – 18 –

    2009 arXiv

  18. [24]

    CMS Collaboration, A search for pair production of new light bosons decaying into muons at sqrt(s)=13 TeV ,

  19. [25]

    CMS Collaboration, Search sensitivity for dark photons decaying to displaced muons with CMS at the high-luminosity LHC ,

  20. [26]

    Aad et al., A search for prompt lepton-jets in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 02 (2016) 062, [arXiv:1511.05542]

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al., A search for prompt lepton-jets in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 02 (2016) 062, [arXiv:1511.05542]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [27]

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for long-lived neutral particles decaying into lepton jets in proton-proton collisions at √s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 11 (2014) 088, [ arXiv:1409.0746]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [28]

    A TLASCollaboration, Search for long-lived neutral particles decaying into displaced lepton jets in proton–proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector ,

  23. [29]

    Aaij et al., Search for Dark Photons Produced in 13 TeV pp Collisions, Phys

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Search for Dark Photons Produced in 13 TeV pp Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018), no. 6 061801, [ arXiv:1710.02867]

    2018 arXiv

  24. [30]

    BaBar Collaboration, J. P. Lees et al., Search for a Dark Photon in e+e− Collisions at BaBar , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014), no. 20 201801, [ arXiv:1406.2980]

    2014 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Aaij et al., Search for A′ → µ+µ− Decays, Phys

    LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Search for A′ → µ+µ− Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020), no. 4 041801, [ arXiv:1910.06926]

    2020

  26. [32]

    E. M. Riordan et al., A Search for Short Lived Axions in an Electron Beam Dump Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 755

    1987

  27. [33]

    Bross, M

    A. Bross, M. Crisler, S. H. Pordes, J. Volk, S. Errede, and J. Wrbanek, A Search for Shortlived Particles Produced in an Electron Beam Dump , Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 2942–2945

    1991

  28. [34]

    Davier and H

    M. Davier and H. Nguyen Ngoc, An Unambiguous Search for a Light Higgs Boson , Phys. Lett. B 229 (1989) 150–155

    1989

  29. [35]

    NA48/2 Collaboration, J. R. Batley et al., Search for the dark photon in π0 decays, Phys. Lett. B 746 (2015) 178–185, [ arXiv:1504.00607]

    2015 arXiv

  30. [36]

    J. D. Bjorken, S. Ecklund, W. R. Nelson, A. Abashian, C. Church, B. Lu, L. W. Mo, T. A. Nunamaker, and P. Rassmann, Search for Neutral Metastable Penetrating Particles Produced in the SLAC Beam Dump , Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988) 3375

    1988

  31. [37]

    Batell, R

    B. Batell, R. Essig, and Z. Surujon, Strong Constraints on Sub-GeV Dark Sectors from SLAC Beam Dump E137 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014), no. 17 171802, [arXiv:1406.2698]

    2014 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Marsicano, M

    L. Marsicano, M. Battaglieri, M. Bondi’, C. D. R. Carvajal, A. Celentano, M. De Napoli, R. De Vita, E. Nardi, M. Raggi, and P. Valente, Dark photon production through positron annihilation in beam-dump experiments , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 1 015031, [ arXiv:1802.03794]. – 19 –

    2018 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Blumlein and J

    J. Blumlein and J. Brunner, New Exclusion Limits for Dark Gauge Forces from Beam-Dump Data, Phys. Lett. B 701 (2011) 155–159, [ arXiv:1104.2747]

    2011 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Bl¨ umlein and J

    J. Bl¨ umlein and J. Brunner,New Exclusion Limits on Dark Gauge Forces from Proton Bremsstrahlung in Beam-Dump Data , Phys. Lett. B 731 (2014) 320–326, [arXiv:1311.3870]

    2014 arXiv

  35. [41]

    S. N. Gninenko, Constraints on sub-GeV hidden sector gauge bosons from a search for heavy neutrino decays , Phys. Lett. B 713 (2012) 244–248, [ arXiv:1204.3583]

    2012 arXiv

  36. [42]

    J. B. Dent, F. Ferrer, and L. M. Krauss, Constraints on Light Hidden Sector Gauge Bosons from Supernova Cooling , arXiv:1201.2683

    arXiv

  37. [43]

    H. K. Dreiner, J.-F. Fortin, C. Hanhart, and L. Ubaldi, Supernova constraints on MeV dark sectors from e+e− annihilations, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014), no. 10 105015, [arXiv:1310.3826]

    2014 arXiv

  38. [44]

    J. H. Chang, R. Essig, and S. D. McDermott, Revisiting Supernova 1987A Constraints on Dark Photons , JHEP 01 (2017) 107, [ arXiv:1611.03864]

    2017 arXiv

  39. [45]

    Hardy and R

    E. Hardy and R. Lasenby, Stellar cooling bounds on new light particles: plasma mixing effects, JHEP 02 (2017) 033, [ arXiv:1611.05852]

    2017 arXiv

  40. [46]

    Bottaro, A

    S. Bottaro, A. Caputo, G. Raffelt, and E. Vitagliano, Stellar limits on scalars from electron-nucleus bremsstrahlung, JCAP 07 (2023) 071, [ arXiv:2303.00778]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [47]

    Fradette, M

    A. Fradette, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, and A. Ritz, Cosmological Constraints on Very Dark Photons , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014), no. 3 035022, [ arXiv:1407.0993]

    2014 arXiv

  42. [48]

    Ilten, Y

    P. Ilten, Y. Soreq, M. Williams, and W. Xue, Serendipity in dark photon searches , JHEP 06 (2018) 004, [ arXiv:1801.04847]

    2018 arXiv

  43. [49]

    J. C. Yang et al., High Intensity heavy ion Accelerator Facility (HIAF) in China , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 317 (2013) 263–265

    2013

  44. [50]

    Zhou and J

    HIAF project T eamCollaboration, X. Zhou and J. Yang, Status of the high-intensity heavy-ion accelerator facility in China , AAPPS Bull. 32 (2022), no. 1 35

    2022

  45. [51]

    J. Yang, L. Sun, and Y. Yuan, Status of the HIAF Accelerator Facility in China , JACoW CYCLOTRONS2022 (2023) MOAI01

    2023

  46. [52]

    Chen et al., A plan for a super η factory at Huizhou accelerator complex , arXiv:2407.00874

    X.-R. Chen et al., A plan for a super η factory at Huizhou accelerator complex , arXiv:2407.00874

    arXiv

  47. [53]

    Y. Liu, R. Wang, Z. Mushtaq, Y. Tian, X. He, H. Qiu, and X. Chen, Simulation of dark scalar particle sensitivity in η rare decay channels at HIAF, arXiv:2412.03196

    arXiv

  48. [55]

    Agostinelli et al., GEANT4–a simulation toolkit , Nucl

    GEANT4 Collaboration, S. Agostinelli et al., GEANT4–a simulation toolkit , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506 (2003) 250–303. – 20 –

    2003

  49. [56]

    Kyselov and M

    Y. Kyselov and M. Ovchynnikov, Searches for long-lived dark photons at proton accelerator experiments, arXiv:2409.11096

    arXiv

  50. [57]

    Blinov, P

    N. Blinov, P. J. Fox, K. J. Kelly, P. A. N. Machado, and R. Plestid, Dark fluxes from electromagnetic cascades, JHEP 07 (2024) 022, [ arXiv:2401.06843]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [58]

    T. Zhou, R. Plestid, K. J. Kelly, N. Blinov, and P. J. Fox, Long-lived vectors from electromagnetic cascades at SHiP , arXiv:2412.01880

    arXiv

  52. [59]

    Gorbunov, A

    D. Gorbunov, A. Makarov, and I. Timiryasov, Decaying light particles in the SHiP experiment: Signal rate estimates for hidden photons , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015), no. 3 035027, [arXiv:1411.4007]

    2015 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Batell, M

    B. Batell, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, Exploring Portals to a Hidden Sector Through Fixed Targets, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 095024, [ arXiv:0906.5614]

    2009 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Navas et al., Review of particle physics , Phys

    Particle Data GroupCollaboration, S. Navas et al., Review of particle physics , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 3 030001

    2024

  55. [62]

    deNiverville, C.-Y

    P. deNiverville, C.-Y. Chen, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, Light dark matter in neutrino beams: production modelling and scattering signatures at MiniBooNE, T2K and SHiP , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017), no. 3 035006, [ arXiv:1609.01770]

    2017 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Y.-D. Tsai, P. deNiverville, and M. X. Liu, Dark Photon and Muon g − 2 Inspired Inelastic Dark Matter Models at the High-Energy Intensity Frontier , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021), no. 18 181801, [ arXiv:1908.07525]

    2021 arXiv

  57. [65]

    M. Du, R. Fang, Z. Liu, and V. Q. Tran, Enhanced long-lived dark photon signals at lifetime frontier detectors , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 5 055012, [arXiv:2111.15503]

    2022 arXiv

  58. [66]

    M. Du, R. Fang, and Z. Liu, Millicharged particles from proton bremsstrahlung in the atmosphere, JHEP 08 (2024) 174, [ arXiv:2211.11469]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    M. Du, R. Fang, Z. Liu, W. Lu, and Z. Ye, Probing invisible dark photon models via atmospheric collisions , arXiv:2308.05607

    arXiv

  60. [68]

    Faessler, M

    A. Faessler, M. I. Krivoruchenko, and B. V. Martemyanov, Once more on electromagnetic form factors of nucleons in extended vector meson dominance model , Phys. Rev. C 82 (2010) 038201, [ arXiv:0910.5589]

    2010 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Feuster and U

    T. Feuster and U. Mosel, Photon and meson induced reactions on the nucleon , Phys. Rev. C 59 (1999) 460–491, [ nucl-th/9803057]

    1999 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Fermi, On the Theory of the impact between atoms and electrically charged particles, Z

    E. Fermi, On the Theory of the impact between atoms and electrically charged particles, Z. Phys. 29 (1924) 315–327

    1924

  63. [71]

    E. J. Williams, Nature of the high-energy particles of penetrating radiation and status of ionization and radiation formulae , Phys. Rev. 45 (1934) 729–730. – 21 –

    1934

  64. [72]

    C. F. von Weizsacker, Radiation emitted in collisions of very fast electrons , Z. Phys. 88 (1934) 612–625

    1934

  65. [73]

    Bauer, P

    M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer, and J. Jaeckel, Hunting All the Hidden Photons , JHEP 07 (2018) 094, [ arXiv:1803.05466]

    2018 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Batell, M

    B. Batell, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, Probing a Secluded U(1) at B-factories , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 115008, [ arXiv:0903.0363]

    2009 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Fabbrichesi, E

    M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and G. Lanfranchi, The Dark Photon , arXiv:2005.01515. – 22 –

    2005 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.