Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Workload Assessment of Human-Machine Interface: A Simulator Study with Psychophysiological Measures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.09603 v1 pith:G3TH6P75 submitted 2024-06-13 cs.HC cs.RO

Workload Assessment of Human-Machine Interface: A Simulator Study with Psychophysiological Measures

classification cs.HC cs.RO
keywords workloadassessmentdesignsfirstmeasuresmethodobjectiveused
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Human-machine Interface (HMI) is critical for safety during automated driving, as it serves as the only media between the automated system and human users. To enable a transparent HMI, we first need to know how to evaluate it. However, most of the assessment methods used for HMI designs are subjective and thus not efficient. To bridge the gap, an objective and standardized HMI assessment method is needed, and the first step is to find an objective method for workload measurement for this context. In this study, two psychophysiological measures, electrocardiography (ECG) and electrodermal activity (EDA), were evaluated for their effectiveness in finding differences in mental workload among different HMI designs in a simulator study. Three HMI designs were developed and used. Results showed that both workload measures were able to identify significant differences in objective mental workload when interacting with in-vehicle HMIs. As a first step toward a standardized assessment method, the results could be used as a firm ground for future studies. Marie Sk{\l}odowska-Curie Actions; Innovative Training Network (ITN); SHAPE-IT; Grant number 860410; Publication date: [29 Sep 2023]; DOI: [10.54941/ahfe1004172]

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.