Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 55 references

In search of novel ductile superconductors

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper predicts that three Heusler-type compounds—HfPd2Al, TiRuSb, and ZrNi2Ga—are simultaneously ductile and superconducting, with predicted isotropic critical temperatures of 6.80 K, 12.88 K, and 8.23 K.

desk verdict Solid screening workflow, but the ductile-superconductor claim is undercut by an uncalibrated Rice-ratio threshold that the paper's own benchmarks would place on the brittle side. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04789 v2 pith:G4IUUU5U submitted 2026-08-05 cond-mat.supr-con

Yiming Zhang , Samuel Poncé This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con PACS 74.25.Ld74.70.-b
keywords ductilesuperconductorshigh-throughputscreeninggeneralizedstackingfaultenergyRice'sratioPugh'sPettifor'sHeuslercompoundsfirst-principleselasticity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to find superconductors that are also ductile, so they can be bent, drawn, or wound into coils without cracking—a combination many practical superconducting devices need. The authors screen 250 experimentally known superconductors from an existing first-principles database, first computing elastic stiffness, Pugh's ratio, and Pettifor's ratio, then computing generalized stacking-fault energies and surface energies for the most promising cubic candidates to estimate Rice's ratio, the microscopic competition between dislocation slip and crack opening. They conclude that three Heusler-type compounds—HfPd2Al, TiRuSb, and ZrNi2Ga—are on the ductile side of this criterion while retaining predicted isotropic superconducting transition temperatures of 6.80 K, 12.88 K, and 8.23 K. If the criterion transfers to these intermetallics, the paper supplies concrete compounds to test for fracture-resistant superconductors.

What carries the argument

The central object is Rice's ratio, $r_{\mathrm{Rice}} = \gamma_{\mathrm{USFE}}/\gamma_{\mathrm{surface}}$, the ratio of the unstable stacking-fault energy to the surface energy on the (1-10) slip plane; a lower value means the crystal prefers to emit dislocations rather than open a crack. The unstable stacking-fault energy comes from a generalized stacking-fault energy (GSFE) curve, the energy cost of rigidly shearing one half of the crystal along the slip plane, fitted to a Fourier series with out-of-plane relaxation. The workflow combines this microscopic indicator with Pugh's ratio $G/B$, Pettifor's ratio $(C_{12}-C_{44})/B$, and a proposed combined score $c^* = c - r_{\mathrm{Rice}}/r_{\mathrm{Rice,avg}}$ to rank superconducting candidates by ductility.

What would settle it

Grow polycrystalline samples of HfPd2Al, TiRuSb, and ZrNi2Ga and deform them in tension or bending: if they fracture before showing measurable plastic strain, or if crack-tip observations show cleavage instead of dislocation emission, the predicted ductility is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that ductility and phonon-mediated superconductivity can coexist in specific intermetallic compounds, and that a first-principles workflow can identify them before synthesis. Starting from 250 experimentally known superconductors with predicted critical temperatures, the paper computes elastic tensors by the finite-displacement method and derives Pugh's and Pettifor's ratios. For seven half- and full-Heusler candidates it then computes relaxed unstable stacking-fault energies and surface energies on the (1-10) slip plane. Three compounds—HfPd2Al, TiRuSb, and ZrNi2Ga—emerge with Rice ratios of 0.44, 0.47, and 0.55 and predicted isotropic critical temperatures of 6.80 K, 12.88 K, and 8.23 K, and the paper's combined ductility-superconductivity score ranks them above the other screened materials.

Load-bearing premise

The ductile-superconductor identification rests on Rice's ratio being a valid predictor for Heusler intermetallics, but the paper sets no numerical ductile threshold and does not calibrate the criterion against experimentally known ductile or brittle superconductors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the predictions hold, HfPd2Al, TiRuSb, and ZrNi2Ga become concrete test targets for ductile superconducting wire or film, with predicted isotropic critical temperatures of 6.80 K, 12.88 K, and 8.23 K.
  • The same workflow can be applied to newly synthesized superconductors, since it starts from elastic tensors and stacking-fault energies rather than from synthesis or melting data.
  • The combined score gives a single ranking number that balances critical temperature, Pugh's ratio, Pettifor's ratio, and Rice's ratio, allowing future screens to compare candidates quantitatively.
  • Out-of-plane relaxation is essential: it reduces the unstable stacking-fault energy by about 50% for these Heusler compounds, so rigidity-based criteria alone can misclassify ductility.
  • Because the predicted critical temperature and the elastic ductility indicators are not correlated in the screened set, the two properties can likely be optimized separately in materials design.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct experimental test of the workflow would be to measure stacking-fault energies in one of the three compounds by transmission electron microscopy of partial dislocation separations, comparing those measurements with the calculated 674–911 mJ/m2 range.
  • Extending the Rice-ratio screen to the hexagonal and layered candidates in the database could reveal additional ductile superconductors, but would require handling their multiple competing slip systems, which the paper sets aside as computationally prohibitive.
  • If synthesis confirms the predictions, neighboring Heusler compositions could be tuned to raise the critical temperature while keeping a low Rice's ratio, turning the screening into a design loop instead of a one-off selection.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript builds a first-principles high-throughput workflow combining elastic-constant calculations (Born expansion vs. finite displacements) and generalized stacking fault energy/surface energy calculations to screen the supercond-EPW database for ductile, phonon-mediated superconductors. After computing Pugh and Pettifor ratios for 250 materials, the authors calculate Rice ratios for seven half- and full-Heusler candidates and identify HfPd2Al, TiRuSb, and ZrNi2Ga as the most promising ductile superconductors, with predicted isotropic Tc values of 6.80 K, 12.88 K, and 8.23 K. The paper also introduces composite ductility indicators c and c* and an approximate Pugh-Pettifor relation for anisotropic hexagonal/trigonal materials.

Significance. If the ductility classification is validated, the paper would be a valuable contribution: it provides an open AiiDA workflow (aiida-mechanical), carefully benchmarks the finite-displacement elastic tensors and GSFE calculations against literature values, and demonstrates the need to go beyond linear elastic indicators for screening. The honest discussion of the limitations of Pugh and Pettifor criteria for anisotropic structures is a strength. However, the central claim that the three Heusler compounds are ductile superconductors rests entirely on Rice-ratio values (0.44-0.55) that are presented without a calibrated ductile/brittle threshold and that lie above the paper's own reference values for ductile BCC metals (0.16-0.33) and FCC metals (0.09-0.21).

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (22)-(23), Table 4] The ductility classification is not calibrated. No value of rRice is stated as separating ductile from brittle behavior, and no validation is provided on experimentally known ductile or brittle C1b/L21 intermetallics. More importantly, the paper's own benchmark data contradict the ductile assignment: the ductile BCC metals in Table 3 have rRice = 0.157 (Li), 0.239 (Na), 0.287 (V), and 0.330 (Nb), and the FCC metals in Table 2 have rRice between roughly 0.09 and 0.21, while the three headline candidates have rRice = 0.44, 0.47, and 0.55. If rRice is a monotonic ductility indicator, these values place the candidates on the brittle side of the same scale; if the criterion is not transferable to ordered intermetallics, that transferability must be demonstrated. As written, statements such as 'the most favorable rRice=0.44' are relative comparisons, not evidence of ductility, and the central conclusion is not supported.
  2. [Section 2, Eq. (19) and Eq. (23), Table 1] The composite indicators c and c* are constructed from dataset averages and used to rank and select candidates, but the text does not discuss how robust the ranking is to this normalization or to the inclusion of anisotropic materials for which the authors explicitly state that Pugh and Pettifor criteria are unreliable. Because the top-39 list contains many layered/hexagonal materials, the screen should be presented as a heuristic pre-filter rather than a quantitative ductility measure, and the dependence of the final shortlist on the dataset composition should be checked or at least discussed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2 and surrounding text] The empirical slope of -0.74 for all 250 materials and the analytical slope of -5/3 for isotropic cubic materials are distinguished, but the text could clarify that Eq. (10) and (11) apply only to cubic systems and that the dashed green line is a global fit.
  2. [Abstract and Conclusion] The term 'high-Tc' is used for predicted Tc values of 6.8-12.9 K; this may be misleading and should be reworded to 'promising' or 'moderately high' predicted Tc, particularly because the paper is aimed at practical superconductors.
  3. [Table 3 and Table 4] Adding the derived rRice values directly in the tables (or in a supplementary table) would make the calibration issue transparent and help readers evaluate the ductility claim.
  4. [Eq. (18)] The approximate relation for hexagonal/trigonal materials would benefit from a statement of how many materials in the database actually satisfy assumptions (C11,C12,C66 >> C33,C13,C44 and C12/C11 ~ 0.3), since Fig. 2 shows the line but not the goodness of fit.
  5. [Throughout] There are minor typographical issues, including 'V oigt' (Voigt), 'Allen-Dyne' (Allen-Dynes), and inconsistent capitalization of 'Pettifor's criterion'; these should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the mechanical screening is computed from first principles, and the only self-citation (the Tc database) is independent prior work.

full rationale

The paper's central ductility claim rests on Rice's ratio (Eq. 22), computed from first-principles GSFE and surface energies (Eqs. 20-21) for the three candidate Heuslers (Table 4). Nothing in these calculations is fitted to the conclusion that HfPd2Al, TiRuSb, and ZrNi2Ga are ductile; the USFE and surface energies are independent DFT outputs, and the workflows are benchmarked against literature values for FCC/BCC/B1 systems (Tables 2-3). The composite indicators c (Eq. 19) and c* (Eq. 23) are transparently presented as ranking scores defined from Tc, rPett, rPugh, and rRice, so calling the top scorers 'most promising' is a definitional screening statement, not a hidden reduction of a prediction to a fit. The predicted superconducting Tc values are taken from the authors' own supercond-EPW database (Ref. [6]); although this is self-citation, the database is published, code-reproduced, parameter-free at the stated PBE level, and does not contain the ductility result, so it provides independent support rather than circular grounding. The paper itself flags the limited reliability of Pugh/Pettifor for anisotropic materials and therefore restricts the Rice analysis to cubic systems; this is a correctness limitation, not a circularity. The skeptic's concern that the Rice ratio threshold (e.g., 0.44-0.55 for the candidates vs. 0.16-0.33 for ductile BCC metals) is uncalibrated is a potential validity gap for the qualitative ductile/brittle verdict, but it does not make the derivation circular. No equation reduces by construction to the reported candidates, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Score 1 reflects only the minor self-citation of the Tc database.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard DFT methodologies (axioms 1-2), on a choice of slip system (3), on Rice's criterion (4), and on the prior database's T_c predictions (5). The only fitted or ad hoc elements are the approximate intercept in Eq. (18) and the dataset-dependent averages in the composite indicator c. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Approximate intercept in Eq. (18) = 3.1
    Derived by assuming C12/C11 approximately 0.3 for layered hexagonal and trigonal materials; used to draw an approximate Pugh-Pettifor boundary for anisotropic materials, not for the final Heusler candidates.
  • Averages in ductility indicator c (Eq. 19) = not reported (computed over 250 materials)
    T_c_iso_avg, r_Pett_avg, and r_Pugh_avg are averages over the screening set; they define the composite ductility score, so the ranking is relative to the database composition.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption PBE DFT with norm-conserving PseudoDojo pseudopotentials gives accurate elastic constants and stacking fault energies for the screened compounds.
    All elastic and GSFE results are computed at this level; no experimental verification is provided for the final candidates.
  • domain assumption Finite-displacement elastic constants with strains of +/-0.0025 and +/-0.0075 capture the linear elastic response for all 250 materials.
    Section S2 reports small RMS fit errors, but the strain range is not explicitly verified per material.
  • domain assumption The (1-10) slip plane is the operative slip plane for the half- and full-Heusler candidates.
    The paper states (1-10) is the easiest compared with (100) and (111) for the seven studied materials, but only this plane is used for the Rice ratios.
  • domain assumption Rice's ratio (gamma_USFE divided by gamma_surface) is a valid indicator of ductility.
    Used to rank candidates; no threshold or experimental calibration is given.
  • domain assumption The superconducting transition temperatures from the supercond-EPW database are reliable predictions.
    T_c values are taken from Ref. [6] without recomputation; Ref. [6] overlaps in authorship with this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The approximate analytic relation for anisotropic hexagonal and trigonal materials assumes C11, C12, C66 much larger than C33, C13, C44 and C12/C11 approximately 0.3.
    Used to derive Eq. (18) for the Pugh-Pettifor boundary of layered materials; the ratio 0.3 is a rough assumption stated without statistical support.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of In search of novel ductile superconductors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G4IUUU5U

@misc{pith2026260804789,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: In search of novel ductile superconductors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G4IUUU5U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04789}
}
abstract

We performed a first-principles high-throughput screening of the mechanical properties of phonon-mediated superconductors selected from the recent experimentally synthesized superconducting materials database PRX Energy 4, 033012 (2025). We developed the workflows that combine first-principles calculations of elastic constants and generalized stacking fault energies to assess the ductility of superconducting candidates. Starting from the 250 materials identified with promising superconducting critical temperatures, we computed their elastic tensors to evaluate bulk and shear moduli, Pugh's ratio, and Pettifor's ratio from first principles. To further characterize their plastic deformation behavior, we calculated the stacking fault energy and surface energy for selected materials and slip directions, allowing the estimation of Rice's ratio and ductility indicators. We found that several new materials simultaneously exhibit high-T$_c$ and ductility including HfPd$_2$Al, TiRuSb, and ZrNi$_2$Ga with predicted isotropic T$_c$= 6.80K, 12.88K, and 8.23K, respectively. This work offers a quantitative mapping of mechanical performance across a wide range of superconductors and provides a reference to identify new mechanically promising superconductors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04789 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of (a) r Pugh= G B and (b) r Pett= C12−C44 B for 250 pre￾dicted superconductors, obtained from the Born expansion and from finite￾displacement (FD) calculations using the same computational parameters as Ref. [6]. Panels (c) and (d) show the same quantities as (a, b) after densifying the q-mesh and increasing the smearing from 20 mRy to 40 mRy for 8 selected outliers highlighted with red dots in (a,b). Th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Correlation between r Pugh and r Pett. Ductile materials have r Pugh < 0.57 and r Pett > 0. The isotropic Migdal-Eliashberg superconductivity T iso c (K) is shown with color and the crystal structure family with symbols. using a converged q-point aligns with FD calculations, as illus￾trated in Sec. ??. We selected eight materials with large dis￾crepancies (highlighted as red dots in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Generalized stacking fault energy γ GSFE for the L21-type full￾Heusler material HfPd2Al on the (110) plane. The slip directions [110], [112], ¯ [001] are compared. that GSFE calculations are necessary as an additional screening beyond elastic descriptors. 3. Conclusion In this work, we studied the mechanical properties of 250 potential superconductors identified through high-throughput electron-phonon coupling calcu… view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bray, Superconductors in Applications; Some Practical Aspects, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductiv- ity 19 (2009) 2533–2539

    J. Bray, Superconductors in Applications; Some Practical Aspects, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductiv- ity 19 (2009) 2533–2539. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1109/TASC.2009.2019287

    arXiv 2009

  2. [2]

    D. J. Scalapino, A common thread: The pairing inter- action for unconventional superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 1383–1417. https://link.aps.org/DOI/10.1103/ RevModPhys.84.1383

    2012

  3. [3]

    Q. Chen, Z. Wang, R. Boyack, S. Yang, K. Levin, When superconductivity crosses over: From BCS to BEC, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96 (2024) 025002. https://link.aps.org/DOI/10.1103/ RevModPhys.96.025002

    2024

  4. [4]

    J.-j. Shi, C. Tian, Y . He, S.-m. Liu, Y .-h. Zhu, J. Du, H.- x. Zhong, X. Wang, A new perspective on ductile high-Tc superconductors under ambient pressure: few-hydrogen metal-bonded hydrides, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 36 (2024) 441501. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ad68b3

    doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ad68b3 2024

  5. [5]

    Bardeen, L

    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of su- perconductivity, Physical Review 108 (1957) 1175–1204. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1103/PhysRev.108.1175

    doi:10.1103/physrev.108.1175 1957

  6. [6]

    Bercx, S

    M. Bercx, S. Poncé, Y . Zhang, G. Trezza, A. G. Ghezel- jehmeidan, L. Bastonero, J. Qiao, F. O. von Rohr, G. Pizzi, E. Chiavazzo, N. Marzari, Charting the Landscape of Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer Superconductors in Experi- mentally Known Compounds, PRX Energy 4 (2025) 033012. https://doi.org/10.1103/sb28-fjc9

    doi:10.1103/sb28-fjc9 2025

  7. [7]

    E. R. Margine, F. Giustino, Anisotropic Migdal- Eliashberg theory using Wannier functions, Physical Review B 87 (2013) 024505. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87. 024505

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.87 2013

  8. [8]

    H. Mori, T. Nomoto, R. Arita, E. R. Margine, Efficient anisotropic migdal-eliashberg calculations with an inter- mediate representation basis and wannier interpolation, Physical Review B 110 (2024) 064505. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110. 064505

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.110 2024

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    S. Tian, K. Zhou, C.-Q. Huang, C. Qian, Z. Gao, Y . Liu, Investigation and understanding of the mechanical prop- erties of MXene by high-throughput computations and in- terpretable machine learning, Extreme Mechanics Letters 57 (2022) 101921. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1016/j.eml.20...

    2022

  2. [10]

    X. Diao, Y . Diao, Y . Tang, G. Zhao, Q. Gu, Y . Xie, Y . Shi, P. Zhu, L. Zhang, High-throughput screening of stable and efficient double inorganic halide perovskite materials by DFT, Scientific Reports 12 (2022) 12633. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1038/ s41598-022-16221-3

    2022

  3. [11]

    H. Xiao, T. Fan, Z. Wang, T. Hu, X. Tang, L. Ma, P. Tang, High-throughput first-principle calculations of the structural, mechanical, and electronic properties of cubic XTiO3 (X=Ca, Sr, Ba, Pb) ceramics under high pressure, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 120 (2020)...

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    Pugh, XCII

    S. Pugh, XCII. Relations between the elastic moduli and the plastic properties of polycrystalline pure metals, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 45 (1954) 823–843. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1080/14786440808520496

    1954 doi

  5. [13]

    D. G. Pettifor, Theoretical predictions of structure and re- lated properties of intermetallics, Materials Science and Technology 8 (1992) 345–349. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1179/mst.1992.8.4.345

    1992 doi

  6. [14]

    Q. Long, X. Nie, S.-L. Shang, J. Wang, Y . Du, Z. Jin, Z.-K. Liu, C15 nbcr2 laves phase with mechanical prop- erties beyond pugh’s criterion, Computational Materials Science 121 (2016) 167–173. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016. 04.042

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    Kelly, W

    A. Kelly, W. R. Tyson, A. H. Cottrell, Ductile and brit- tle crystals, The Philosophical Magazine: A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics 15 (1967) 567–586. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1080/14786436708220903

    1967 doi

  8. [16]

    Yan, C.-Y

    J.-A. Yan, C.-Y . Wang, S.-Y . Wang, Generalized- stacking-fault energy and dislocation properties in bcc Fe: A first-principles study, Physical Review B 70 (2004) 174105. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.70. 174105

    2004 doi

  9. [17]

    Woodward, D

    C. Woodward, D. R. Trinkle, L. G. Hector, D. L. Olmsted, Prediction of Dislocation Cores in Aluminum from Density Functional Theory, Physical Review Letters 100 (2008) 045507. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100. 045507

    2008 doi

  10. [18]

    C. H. Henager, R. G. Hoagland, Dislocation and stacking fault core fields in fcc metals, Philosophical Magazine 85 (2005) 4477–4508. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1080/14786430500300181

    2005 doi

  11. [19]

    Vitek, Core structure of screw dislocations in body-centred cubic metals: relation to symmetry and interatomic bonding, Philosophical Magazine 84 (2004) 415–428

    V . Vitek, Core structure of screw dislocations in body-centred cubic metals: relation to symmetry and interatomic bonding, Philosophical Magazine 84 (2004) 415–428. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1080/ 14786430310001611644

    2004

  12. [20]

    P. Tu, Y . Zheng, C. Zhuang, X. Zeng, H. Zhu, A high-throughput computation framework for generalized stacking fault energies of pure metals, Computational Materials Science 159 (2019) 357–364. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018. 12.013

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    Rodney, L

    D. Rodney, L. Ventelon, E. Clouet, L. Pizzagalli, F. Willaime, Ab initio modeling of dislocation core properties in metals and semiconductors, Acta Materialia 124 (2017) 633–659. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016. 09.049

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    G. Lu, N. Kioussis, V . V . Bulatov, E. Kaxiras, Dislocation core properties of aluminum: a first-principles study, Materials Science and Engineering: A 309–310 (2001) 142–147. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00) 01711-1

    2001 doi

  15. [23]

    Vamsi, M

    K. Vamsi, M. Charpagne, T. Pollock, High-throughput approach for estimation of intrinsic barriers in FCC structures for alloy design, Scripta Materialia 204 (2021) 114126. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat. 2021.114126

    2021

  16. [24]

    D. J. Siegel, Generalized stacking fault energies, ductili- ties, and twinnabilities of Ni and selected Ni alloys, Ap- plied Physics Letters 87 (2005) 121901. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1063/1.2051793

    2005 doi

  17. [25]

    Gao, T.-R

    Z. Gao, T.-R. Wei, T. Deng, P. Qiu, W. Xu, Y . Wang, L. Chen, X. Shi, High-throughput screening of 2D van der Waals crystals with plastic deformability, Nature Communications 13 (2022) 7491. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1038/ s41467-022-35229-x

    2022

  18. [26]

    Zhang, Y

    S. Zhang, Y . Li, S. Suzuki, A. Nakamura, S. Ogata, Neural network potential for dislocation plasticity in ceramics, npj Computational Materials 10 (2024) 266. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1038/ s41524-024-01456-7

    2024

  19. [27]

    Koutná, A

    N. Koutná, A. Brenner, D. Holec, P. H. Mayrhofer, High-throughput first-principles search for ceramic super- lattices with improved ductility and fracture resistance, Acta Materialia 206 (2021) 116615. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020. 116615

    2021 doi

  20. [28]

    J. R. Rice, R. Thomson, Ductile versus brittle behaviour of crystals, The Philosophical Magazine: A Journal of The- oretical Experimental and Applied Physics 29 (1974) 73– 97. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1080/14786437408213555

    1974 doi

  21. [29]

    C. Lin, S. Poncé, F. Macheda, F. Mauri, N. Marzari, Elastic Constants and Bending Rigidities from Long- Wavelength Perturbation Expansions, PRX Energy 5 (2026) 013012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/hc53-g1p3

    2026 doi

  22. [30]

    Dal Corso, Clean Ir(111) and Pt(111) electronic surface states: A first-principle fully relativistic investiga- tion, Surface Science 637–638 (2015) 106–115

    A. Dal Corso, Clean Ir(111) and Pt(111) electronic surface states: A first-principle fully relativistic investiga- tion, Surface Science 637–638 (2015) 106–115. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1016/j.susc.2015.03. 013 16

    2015 doi

  23. [31]

    Dal Corso, Elastic constants of beryllium: a first- principles investigation, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 28 (2016) 075401

    A. Dal Corso, Elastic constants of beryllium: a first- principles investigation, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 28 (2016) 075401. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1088/0953-8984/28/7/ 075401

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    Gonze, C

    X. Gonze, C. Lee, Dynamical matrices, Born effective charges, dielectric permittivity tensors, and interatomic force constants from density-functional perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. B 55 (1997) 10355–10368. https://link.aps.org/DOI/10.1103/PhysRevB. 55.10355

    1997 doi

  25. [33]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, P. Giannozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density- functional perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 (2001) 515–562. https://link.aps.org/DOI/10.1103/ RevModPhys.73.515

    2001

  26. [34]

    Petretto, S

    G. Petretto, S. Dwaraknath, H. P.C. Miranda, D. Win- ston, M. Giantomassi, M. J. van Setten, X. Gonze, K. A. Persson, G. Hautier, G.-M. Rignanese, High-throughput density-functional perturbation theory phonons for inor- ganic materials, Scientific Data 5 (2018) 180065. http://...

    2018 doi

  27. [35]

    S. P. Huber, S. Zoupanos, M. Uhrin, L. Talirz, L. Kahle, R. Häuselmann, D. Gresch, T. Müller, A. V . Yakutovich, C. W. Andersen, F. F. Ramirez, C. S. Adorf, F. Gargiulo, S. Kumbhar, E. Passaro, C. Johnston, A. Merkys, A. Ce- pellotti, N. Mounet, N. Marzari, B. Kozinsky, G. Piz...

    2020

  28. [36]

    Uhrin, S

    M. Uhrin, S. P. Huber, J. Yu, N. Marzari, G. Pizzi, Workflows in AiiDA: Engineering a high-throughput, event-based engine for robust and modular computational workflows, Computational Materials Science 187 (2021) 110086. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020. 110086

    2021 doi

  29. [37]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. D. Jr, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerst-...

    2017

  30. [38]

    Poncé, E

    S. Poncé, E. Margine, C. Verdi, F. Giustino, EPW: Electron–phonon coupling, transport and superconducting properties using maximally localized Wannier functions, Computer Physics Communications 209 (2016) 116–133. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2016.07.028

    2016 doi

  31. [39]

    H. Lee, S. Poncé, K. Bushick, S. Hajinazar, J. Lafuente- Bartolome, J. Leveillee, C. Lian, J.-M. Lihm, F. Macheda, H. Mori, H. Paudyal, W. H. Sio, S. Tiwari, M. Zacharias, X. Zhang, N. Bonini, E. Kioupakis, E. R. Margine, F. Giustino, Electron–phonon physics from first princi-...

    2023

  32. [40]

    van Setten, M

    M. van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. Ver- straete, D. Hamann, X. Gonze, G.-M. Rignanese, The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 element opti- mized norm-conserving pseudopotential table, Computer Physics Communications 226 (2018) 39–54. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1016/j...

    2018 doi

  33. [41]

    Dal Corso, thermo_pw.2.0.0,https://dalcorso

    A. Dal Corso, thermo_pw.2.0.0,https://dalcorso. github.io/thermo_pw/(2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Hill, The Elastic Behaviour of a Crystalline Aggregate, Proceedings of the Physical Society

    R. Hill, The Elastic Behaviour of a Crystalline Aggregate, Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A 65 (1952) 349–354. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1088/0370-1298/65/5/ 307

    1952 doi

  35. [43]

    Thompson, W

    R. Thompson, W. Clegg, Predicting whether a material is ductile or brittle, Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 22 (2018) 100–108. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2018.04. 001

    2018 doi

  36. [44]

    Niu, X.-Q

    H. Niu, X.-Q. Chen, P. Liu, W. Xing, X. Cheng, D. Li, Y . Li, Extra-electron induced covalent strengthening and generalization of intrinsic ductile-to-brittle criterion, Sci- entific Reports 2 (2012) 718. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1038/srep00718

    2012 doi

  37. [45]

    O. N. Senkov, D. B. Miracle, Generalization of intrinsic ductile-to-brittle criteria by Pugh and Pettifor for mate- rials with a cubic crystal structure, Scientific Reports 11 (2021) 4531. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1038/ s41598-021-83953-z

    2021

  38. [46]

    Zhang, S

    Y . Zhang, S. Poncé, aiida-mechanical: An AiiDA workflow for automated mechanical properties cal- culations,https://github.com/aiidaplugins/ aiida-mechanical(2026). 17

    2026

  39. [47]

    I. L. Dillamore, R. E. Smallman, The stacking-fault en- ergy of F.C.C. metals, Philosophical Magazine 12 (1965) 191–193. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1080/14786436508224959

    1965 doi

  40. [48]

    Bernstein, E

    N. Bernstein, E. Tadmor, Tight-binding calculations of stacking energies and twinnability in fcc metals, Physi- cal Review B 69 (2004) 094116. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.094116

    2004 doi

  41. [49]

    Hartford, B

    J. Hartford, B. von Sydow, G. Wahnström, B. I. Lundqvist, Peierls barriers and stresses for edge dislocations in Pd and Al calculated from first principles, Physical Review B 58 (1998) 2487–2496. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.58.2487

    1998 doi

  42. [50]

    J. A. Zimmerman, H. Gao, F. F. Abraham, Generalized stacking fault energies for embedded atom FCC metals, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engi- neering 8 (2000) 103–115. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1088/0965-0393/8/2/302

    2000 doi

  43. [51]

    Zhang, S

    X.-C. Zhang, S. Cao, L.-J. Zhang, R. Yang, Q.-M. Hu, Unstable stacking fault energy and peierls stress for eval- uating slip system competition in body-centered cubic metals, Journal of Materials Research and Technology 22 (2023) 3413–3422. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.202...

    2023 doi

  44. [52]

    L. Liu, X. Z. Wu, R. Wang, H. F. Feng, S. Wu, On the generalized stacking energy, core structure and Peierls stress of the 1 2⟨110⟩{ 110} dislocations in alkali halide, The European Physical Journal B 85 (2012) 58. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1140/epjb/ e2011-20767-7

    2012 doi

  45. [53]

    C. Lin, S. Poncé, N. Marzari, General invariance and equilibrium conditions for lattice dynamics in 1D, 2D, and 3D materials, Materials Cloud Archive 2022.111 (2022). https://DOI.org/10.24435/materialscloud: gf-3n

    2022 doi

  46. [54]

    Marazzi, S

    E. Marazzi, S. Poncé, J.-C. Charlier, G.-M. Rignanese, Importance of nonadiabatic effects in kohn anomalies in 1d metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 (2025) 256402.doi:10. 1103/x69r-8fw1. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/x69r-8fw1

    2025 doi

  47. [55]

    J. F. Devlin, Stacking-fault energies in simple metals: applications to BCC metals, Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics 11 (1981) 2497–2513. http://dx.DOI.org/10.1088/0305-4608/11/12/ 004 18

    1981 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.