Black bounces to traversable wormholes from pure gravity in four and higher dimensions

Jacopo Mazza

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 121 references

Black bounces to traversable wormholes from pure gravity in four and higher dimensions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that almost any static, spherically symmetric wormhole or black-bounce metric—the Simpson–Visser metric among them—can be made the unique vacuum solution of a higher-dimensional pure-metric gravity theory by…

desk verdict Genuine extension of the 2D integrable-Horndeski reverse-engineering to two-function metrics, with an honestly flagged throat caveat; refereeing should focus on extending solutions through the throat and displaying the 4D uplift. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02771 v1 pith:G63WNV6X submitted 2026-08-03 gr-qc

Jacopo Mazza This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qc

keywords wormholesblackbouncesHorndeskitheoryquasi-topologicalgravityreverseengineeringSimpson-VissermetricBirkhofftheoremVaidyaspacetimes

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Vacuum solutions of modified gravity are usually found by choosing a theory and solving for the metric; this paper reverses the direction. It extends the effective two-dimensional description of spherically symmetric gravity to metrics that depend on two independent functions, rather than one, and shows that for almost any static spherical wormhole or black-bounce metric a higher-dimensional pure-metric theory exists for which that metric is the unique vacuum solution. The construction works whenever the parameter to be interpreted as mass appears in only one of the two metric components; the metric's other parameters become coupling constants of the theory. The paper demonstrates the method on the Simpson–Visser black bounce, a singular deformation, and the Damour–Solodukhin wormhole, and couples the theory to null dust to obtain time-dependent solutions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the closure condition $d\omega=0$ for the field-space one-form $\omega=\alpha\,\eta\,d\phi+\beta\,\eta\,d\chi$. Closure implies the existence of a potential $\Omega(\phi,\chi)$ such that $\alpha=\Omega_\phi/\eta$ and $\beta=\Omega_\chi/\eta$, which turns the two-dimensional field equations into the algebraic constraints $h(r)=\eta(r)$ and $\Omega(r,\chi(r))=4M$. The second half of the machinery is the uplift: a prescription that rewrites any two-dimensional Horndeski action as the symmetric reduction of a $D\geq 4$ action built only from the metric, the Riemann tensor, and covariant derivatives, so that solutions of the two-dimensional theory become vacuum solutions in higher dimensions.

What would settle it

Take the reverse-engineered Simpson–Visser theory and ask whether the metric satisfies the full four-dimensional field equations in a neighbourhood that includes the throat $r=\ell$, using coordinates that are regular there. If the divergent field-space Lagrangian forces a distributional source or a discontinuity in derivatives at the throat, the black bounce is only a local vacuum solution, not a global one.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the class of 'integrable' two-dimensional Horndeski theories, which previously produced metrics described by a single function, extends to metrics described by two functions $h(r)$ and $f(r)$. Starting with arbitrary functions $\Omega(\phi,\chi)$ and $\eta(\phi)$, the equations of motion reduce to $h(r)=\eta(r)$ and $\Omega(r,\chi(r))=4M$, so the solution is fixed by one integration constant $M$; the associated Horndeski theory has $\alpha=\Omega_\phi/\eta$ and $\beta=\Omega_\chi/\eta$. Uplifting such two-dimensional theories to $D\geq 4$ dimensions gives purely metric higher-curvature gravities whose symmetric reductions reproduce them, so the same construction yields a $D$-dimensional action for which the prescribed wormhole or black-bounce metric is an exact vacuum solution. The paper states this rigorously in adapted coordinates that are valid on either side of the throat, noting that the throat itself is not covered and the Lagrangian diverges on the surface $\phi=\ell$.

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes the adapted coordinates with $\phi=r$ are available, but at a wormhole throat $\nabla\phi=0$, so the field equations are derived only on patches away from the throat; if the reverse-engineered solution cannot be extended through the throat, the wormhole is not a global vacuum solution.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Any static spherical wormhole or black-bounce metric whose mass parameter appears only in $f(r)$ can be embedded as the unique vacuum solution of a well-defined higher-dimensional metric theory of gravity.
The reverse-engineered theories automatically satisfy a Birkhoff–Jebsen theorem: their vacuum solutions are static, and the only primary hair is the integration constant $M$.
The throat radius $\ell$ of a wormhole is necessarily a coupling constant of the action, so it cannot be changed by dynamics or generated during collapse.
The Damour–Solodukhin wormhole escapes the construction without fine tuning because both $M$ and $\lambda$ enter both metric components.
Coupling to a Vaidya-like null-dust source yields time-dependent solutions, including a Simpson–Visser metric with $M\to M(v)$, which can interpolate between traversable-wormhole and black-bounce configurations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Inference: if no smooth analytic extension through the throat exists, the construction should be read as showing local patch solutions rather than global wormhole spacetimes; a junction-condition analysis would settle whether the throat hosts a shell.
Inference: the reverse-engineering map from metrics to Lagrangians suggests a classification of phenomenological wormhole and black-bounce metrics according to whether the mass parameter enters $f$ alone, and could be used to screen candidate black-hole mimickers.
Inference: because $\ell$ is frozen, accretion or evaporation can only move the apparent horizon $2M(v)$ relative to a fixed throat; observing a shift of the throat radius in such a solution would falsify this class of theories.
Inference: the two deformations—changing $\eta$ at fixed $\Omega$, or changing $h$ at fixed $f$—give an explicit dictionary between metric changes and action changes that could be used to study stability of these solutions under perturbations.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Read this one if you work on quasi-topological gravity or on embedding wormholes in pure gravity. The paper does something real: it extends the 2D Horndeski reverse-engineering formalism from h=1 to a second metric function h(r)=eta(phi), gives the extended integrability condition (eq. 30), and shows the construction lifts to D>=4 pure-metric theories. That closes a genuine gap, because single-function metrics cannot describe vacuum wormholes. The Simpson–Visser example is worked out explicitly in 2D, with the singular deformation and the Damour–Solodukhin case as instructive boundary cases. The Vaidya extension is a straightforward but useful bonus.

Credit where due: the algebra in Sections 2–3 is coherent, the three examples do what they claim, and the author is unusually upfront about the construction's limits. The reverse engineering is by construction, and the paper says so; I do not count that as a flaw, provided the reader understands this is an embedding argument, not a prediction. The citation pattern is fine.

The soft spots are real, and the main one is the throat. The adapted-coordinate construction needs grad phi != 0, the throat is exactly where grad phi = 0, and h(r) diverges there; for Simpson–Visser the Lagrangian diverges at phi = ell. The paper concedes in Section 7 that strictly speaking the metrics are solutions only away from the throat and that analytic continuation is 'not quite straightforward'. That matters: a wormhole is defined by its throat, and without a junction condition, a distributional argument, or a genuine extension through the throat, the advertised global vacuum wormhole or black bounce is not established. The author flags this, so it is an honest gap in the central claim rather than a hidden one. A second, smaller issue: the title says four and higher dimensions, but the explicit 4D uplift for the main example is omitted. I would ask for it, or for a supplementary file, before publication; otherwise the D>=4 part rests entirely on the cited uplift theorems. The Damour–Solodukhin discussion is fine and correctly shows when the method fails.

My bottom line: this is a solid, useful construction paper with one load-bearing caveat that is disclosed. The right referee report would ask for a throat treatment, such as junction conditions or an explicit statement that the result is local, and for the 4D action of the Simpson–Visser example. I would send it to peer review, and I would probably cite the method if I were working on wormhole embeddings.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper extends the dimensional-reduction framework of quasi-topological gravities to reverse-engineer a 2D Horndeski theory for static, spherically symmetric metrics described by two functions, h(r) and f(r;M), rather than a single function. The central construction, eqs. (26)-(28), defines α and β from a potential Ω and a function η, so that solutions satisfy h(r)=η(r) and Ω(r,χ(r))=4M; this is then uplifted to D≥4 pure-metric theories using results of [55-57]. The method is applied to the Simpson-Visser black bounce, a singular deformation of Schwarzschild, and the Damour-Solodukhin wormhole, and to a Vaidya-like extension in Sect. 6. The paper explicitly acknowledges that the adapted coordinates fail at the throat and that the wormhole metrics are solutions only away from it.

Significance. If the throat-extension gap can be closed, the paper provides a valuable existence result: a large class of wormhole and black-bounce metrics, including Simpson-Visser, are vacuum solutions of higher-dimensional pure-metric theories, with the throat scale ℓ as a coupling constant. The 2D algebraic construction is coherent, the reverse engineering is checked against three examples, and the paper is unusually candid about its limitations. The main contribution is the extension of the integrability condition to two independent metric functions, which is a genuine generalization of prior work. However, as it stands, the advertised global wormhole/black-bounce vacuum solutions are only proven on patches away from the throat, which bears directly on the paper's central claim.

major comments (3)

[Sect. 5.1 and Sect. 7] The Simpson-Visser metric is shown to satisfy the field equations only on the two patches r>ℓ and r<ℓ, not on a neighbourhood of the throat. The adapted coordinates of Sect. 2.2 require ∇φ≠0, which fails exactly at the throat φ=ℓ, and the theory functions η_SV, α_SV, β_SV in eqs. (55)-(58) diverge at φ=ℓ. The author concedes in Sect. 7 that, strictly speaking, the metrics are solutions only away from the throat and that analytic continuation is 'not quite straightforward'. Since the throat is the defining feature of a wormhole or black bounce, the central claim that these spacetimes are vacuum solutions of the constructed theory is not established. The manuscript should either supply a junction or distributional extension across the throat, or explicitly restrict all claims in the abstract and title to local solutions away from the throat.
[Sect. 3.1, eqs. (26)-(28)] The reverse-engineering result is by construction: α and β are defined from Ω and η, so the field equations become identities for any metric of the form h(r)=η(r) with Ω(r,χ(r))=4M. This should be framed explicitly as an existence theorem, not as a derivation of wormholes from a fundamental theory. More importantly, the uniqueness statement following eq. (28) ('unique solution') is only proven within a single adapted-coordinate patch. For a wormhole manifold consisting of two patches joined at the throat, the matching conditions at the throat are not analyzed, so uniqueness of the global solution is not established. This is a separate aspect of the throat problem that deserves a clear statement.
[Sect. 4 and Sect. 5.1] The abstract claims pure-gravity vacua in four and higher dimensions, but for the Simpson-Visser example no explicit D-dimensional uplift is constructed. The paper states that α_SV and β_SV cannot be written in the form of eqs. (44)-(45), so the uplift necessarily involves derivatives of the Riemann tensor, and refers to [55-57] for the general uplift formula. A reader cannot verify from the manuscript that the uplifted action is well-defined on a domain including the relevant field-space points, nor whether the divergence at φ=ℓ persists in D dimensions. The higher-dimensional claim would be supported by providing the explicit uplifted action for at least one example, or by a precise statement of the domain of validity of the general theorem in [55-57] for the extended integrable class.

minor comments (5)

[Sect. 6] There is a typo: 'Simposon-Visser' should be 'Simpson-Visser' in the paragraph following eq. (82).
[Sect. 4, eq. (41)] The notation 'the I I' in the text after eq. (41) is unclear; the collection of operators Iϕ, Iχ, I□ϕ, I∇a∇bϕ, IR should be defined explicitly.
[Sect. 2.2] The statement that h_0(v) can be set to one without loss of generality via a redefinition of v should mention that this assumes h_0(v) is nonvanishing; the wormhole patches have h≠0 but this is a minor regularity condition worth stating.
[Sect. 5.3] The use of both M and M̃ in eqs. (66)-(69) is potentially confusing; a sentence emphasizing that M̃ is the integration constant while M is a coupling constant of the theory would improve readability.
[Sect. 3.2] The term 'extended integrability' may clash with other uses of 'integrability' in the modified-gravity literature; adding a brief remark distinguishing the notion used here from, e.g., complete integrability of the equations of motion would be helpful.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The wormhole/black-bounce 'derivations' are reverse-engineering identities: the action is built from the target metric via Eqs. (26)-(28), so the solution is an input by construction. The paper is explicit about this, and the construction has real mathematical content, but the central examples are not independent predictions.

self definitional [Sect. 3.1, Eqs. (26)-(28) and the reverse-engineering paragraph after Eq. (28)]
"To summarise: for any choice of functions Ω(φ,χ) and η(φ), there exists a two-dimensional Horndeski theory, specified by α and β as per eq. (26), whose unique solution has h(r)=η(r) and Ω(r,χ(r))=4M. ... given a metric specified by a function f(r;M) ... one can reverse engineer a two-dimensional Horndeski theory of which the metric is the unique solution. To achieve this goal, one may simply invert the relation between f and M to write M(r,f); the theory is then specified by Ω(ϕ,χ)=4M(ϕ,h^2(ϕ)χ) and η(ϕ)=h(ϕ)."

Eq. (28) defines the solution for the theory built from η and Ω; it is not a consequence of an independently fixed action. The reverse-engineering recipe then chooses η(φ)=h(φ) and Ω(φ,χ)=4M(φ,h^2(φ)χ), so the target metric components are literally substituted into the action. The equations of motion then return the same metric. This is self-definitional: the target solution is an input, not an output.
self definitional [Sect. 5.1, Eqs. (54)-(59)]
"Applying the strategy outlined in sect. 3.1, it is straightforward to see that such a theory must have η(ϕ)=η_SV(ϕ):= ϕ/√(ϕ^2−ℓ^2), Ω(ϕ,χ)=Ω_SV(ϕ,χ):=2ϕ(1−χ ϕ^2/(ϕ^2−ℓ^2)). ... Therefore, a two-dimensional Lagrangian whose unique solution is the Simpson–Visser metric is [eq. (59)]."

η_SV and Ω_SV are read off from the Simpson–Visser metric (54) using the reverse-engineering prescription of Sect. 3.1. The statement that the Lagrangian (59) has the Simpson–Visser metric as its unique solution is therefore true by construction: the action was designed so that Eq. (28) holds on that metric. No independent dynamical principle selects the Simpson–Visser form over other metrics; the subsequent field-equation check verifies an identity.

full rationale

The paper is candid that it is reverse engineering: the abstract says one can 'reverse engineer a well-defined higher-dimensional theory having such a metric as solution', and Sect. 3.1 explicitly builds Ω and η from the desired metric. If the claim were merely existence of a pure-metric theory for each metric, the construction would be legitimate and not circular. However, the abstract and conclusions phrase the results as deriving wormholes and black bounces as vacuum solutions of pure gravity, and the mechanism is to define the action from the target metric. Under the stated rubric, Eqs. (26)-(28) and their application to Simpson–Visser are a reduction-by-construction: the 'predicted' metric is the input used to define the theory. I therefore assign a partial-circularity score of 6 rather than 0. The score is not higher because the paper explicitly discloses the reverse engineering, and it contains independent mathematical content: the extended integrability condition, the two-function generalization, the uplift discussion, and the honest failure analysis for the Damour–Solodukhin example. The throat-patch limitation discussed in Sect. 5 and Sect. 7 is a genuine technical gap but is not itself a circularity; it concerns whether the constructed solution extends across the throat, not whether the input was relabeled as output. No load-bearing self-citation chain was found: the uplift results [55-57] are cited from prior work by others, and the paper's own reverse-engineering content is what carries the construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result is a reverse-engineering existence statement, so it carries no observational constraints. The builder's freedom is large: for any target metric, Ω and η are chosen so that the metric is the unique solution, and the uplift to D>=4 relies on existence theorems from [55-57]. The throat scale ℓ is a coupling constant inserted by hand for the Simpson-Visser example. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced; the function η(φ) is a bookkeeping device that records the off-diagonal metric component, not an entity.

free parameters (3)

throat scale ℓ = free coupling constant, e.g. ℓ>2M for a traversable wormhole
Appears in η_SV and Ω_SV, eqs. (55)-(56), and sets the wormhole or black-bounce throat size. The paper explicitly treats ℓ as a coupling constant, not an integration constant.
function η(φ), equivalently h(r) = η(φ)=h(φ), chosen to match the target metric
Introduced in eq. (22) and used to encode the off-diagonal metric component h(r). This is the new functional freedom that goes beyond the h=1 literature.
potential Ω(φ,χ) = Ω chosen so that Ω(r,h²χ)=4M(r,f)
Encodes the diagonal metric component f(r) through eq. (26). This is an arbitrary function of the theory, selected by hand so that the desired metric is the unique solution.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The symmetry-reduced effective action of any metric-only D-dimensional gravity theory with second-order equations of motion is a 2D Horndeski theory (eq. 1).
Used throughout the paper; relies on [66,67] and the dimensional-reduction argument in [41].
domain assumption The principle of symmetric criticality holds, so solutions of the reduced 2D equations are also solutions of the D-dimensional equations.
Invoked in Sect. 4 with citations [85-87]; needed to justify the uplift to D>=4.
domain assumption Every 2D Horndeski theory of the stated form can be uplifted to a D>=4 metric theory using the I-scalars of [55-57].
The paper writes the uplift action (41), but explicit realizations of the I-scalars are borrowed from earlier works; for Simpson-Visser the uplift involves derivatives of the Riemann tensor and is not displayed.
domain assumption The scalar field has nonvanishing gradient (∇φ≠0) and β≠0, so the adapted gauge and the division by β are valid.
Assumed in Sects. 2.2 and 3.1; ∇φ=0 exactly at a wormhole throat, which is why the construction only covers patches away from the throat.
ad hoc to paper The target metric is static and has exactly one integration constant M appearing only in f(r), not in h(r).
Required by the reverse-engineering procedure; violated by the Damour-Solodukhin metric, a limitation the paper discusses in Sect. 5.3.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Black bounces to traversable wormholes from pure gravity in four and higher dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G63WNV6X

@misc{pith2026260802771,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Black bounces to traversable wormholes from pure gravity in four and higher dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G63WNV6X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02771}
}

read the original abstract

This article derives static and spherically symmetric wormhole and black bounce spacetimes as vacuum solutions of metric gravitational theories in four and higher dimensions. To this end, I extend previous results on quasi-topological gravities to encompass cases in which the metric depends on two arbitrary functions of one variable --- instead of the usual single function. I then explain how, given (almost) any spherically symmetric metric, one can reverse engineer a well-defined higher-dimensional theory having such a metric as solution. I apply these results to three paradigmatic examples, including the Simpson--Visser black bounce, to showcase the versatility of this method, as well as its limitations. Moreover, I consider the coupling to a Vaidya-like matter source, so as to generate time-varying solutions and investigate what kind of dynamical evolution these theories can account for.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

[1]

Einstein and N

A. Einstein and N. Rosen,The Particle Problem in the General Theory of Relativity, Physical Review48(1935) 73

1935
[2]

Flamm,Beitr¨ age zur Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie,Physikalische Zeitschrift XVII(1916) 448

L. Flamm,Beitr¨ age zur Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie,Physikalische Zeitschrift XVII(1916) 448

1916
[3]

Flamm,Republication of: Contributions to Einstein’s theory of gravitation,General Relativity and Gravitation47(2015) 72

L. Flamm,Republication of: Contributions to Einstein’s theory of gravitation,General Relativity and Gravitation47(2015) 72

2015
[4]

Gibbons,Editorial note to: Ludwig Flamm, Contributions to Einstein’s theory of gravitation,General Relativity and Gravitation47(2015) 71

G.W. Gibbons,Editorial note to: Ludwig Flamm, Contributions to Einstein’s theory of gravitation,General Relativity and Gravitation47(2015) 71

2015
[5]

Morris and K.S

M.S. Morris and K.S. Thorne,Wormholes in spacetime and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity,American Journal of Physics56(1988) 395

1988
[6]

Visser,Lorentzian Wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking, American Institute of Physics (1996)

M. Visser,Lorentzian Wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking, American Institute of Physics (1996)

1996
[7]

Lobo,Exotic solutions in General Relativity: Traversable wormholes and ’warp drive’ spacetimes, inClassical and Quantum Gravity Research Progress, pp

F.S.N. Lobo,Exotic solutions in General Relativity: Traversable wormholes and ’warp drive’ spacetimes, inClassical and Quantum Gravity Research Progress, pp. 1–78, arXiv (2007), DOI [0710.4474]

arXiv 2007
[8]

Lobo, ed.,Wormholes, Warp Drives and Energy Conditions, vol

F.S.N. Lobo, ed.,Wormholes, Warp Drives and Energy Conditions, vol. 189 of Fundamental Theories of Physics, Springer (2017), 10.1007/978-3-319-55182-1

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55182-1 2017

Show all 121 references

[9]

Bambi and D

C. Bambi and D. Stojkovic,Astrophysical Wormholes,Universe7(2021) 136 [2105.00881]. 21

2021 arXiv
[10]

Carballo-Rubio, F.D

R. Carballo-Rubio, F.D. Filippo, S. Liberati, M. Visser, J. Arrechea, C. Barcel´ o et al., Towards a Non-singular Paradigm of Black Hole Physics,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2025(2025) 003 [2501.05505]

2025 arXiv
[11]

Carballo-Rubio, F

R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati and M. Visser,Opening the Pandora’s box at the core of black holes,Classical and Quantum Gravity37(2020) 145005 [1908.03261]

2020 arXiv
[12]

Carballo-Rubio, F

R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati and M. Visser,Geodesically complete black holes,Physical Review D101(2020) 084047 [1911.11200]

2020 arXiv
[13]

Barcelo and M

C. Barcelo and M. Visser,Scalar fields, energy conditions, and traversable wormholes, Classical and Quantum Gravity17(2000) 3843 [gr-qc/0003025]

2000 arXiv
[14]

Barcelo and M

C. Barcelo and M. Visser,Twilight for the energy conditions?,International Journal of Modern Physics D11(2002) 1553 [gr-qc/0205066]

2002 arXiv
[15]

Huang and J

H. Huang and J. Yang,Charged Ellis Wormhole and Black Bounce,Physical Review D 100(2019) 124063 [1909.04603]

2019 arXiv
[16]

Bronnikov and R.K

K.A. Bronnikov and R.K. Walia,Field sources for Simpson-Visser spacetimes,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 044039 [2112.13198]

2022 arXiv
[17]

Bronnikov,On black bounces, wormholes and partly phantom scalar fields,Physical Review D106(2022) 064029 [2206.09227]

K.A. Bronnikov,On black bounces, wormholes and partly phantom scalar fields,Physical Review D106(2022) 064029 [2206.09227]

2022 arXiv
[18]

Rodrigues and M.V.d.S

M.E. Rodrigues and M.V.d.S. Silva,Source of black bounces in general relativity, Physical Review D107(2023) 044064 [2302.10772]

2023 arXiv
[19]

Alencar, K.A

G. Alencar, K.A. Bronnikov, M.E. Rodrigues, D.S.-C. G´ omez and M.V.d.S. Silva,On black bounce space-times in non-linear electrodynamics,The European Physical Journal C84(2024) 745 [2403.12897]

2024 arXiv
[20]

Alencar, A

G. Alencar, A. Duran-Cabac´ es, D. Rubiera-Garcia and D. S´ aez-Chill´ on G´ omez,General spherically symmetric black bounces within nonlinear electrodynamics,Physical Review D 111(2025) 104020 [2501.03909]

2025 arXiv
[21]

Pereira, D

C.F.S. Pereira, D. C. Rodrigues, J.C. Fabris and M.E. Rodrigues,Black-bounce solution in k-essence theories,Physical Review D109(2024) 044011 [2309.10963]

2024 arXiv
[22]

Pereira, D

C.F.S. Pereira, D. C. Rodrigues, ´E.L. Martins, J.C. Fabris and M.E. Rodrigues,New sources of ghost fields in k-essence theories for black-bounce solutions,Classical and Quantum Gravity42(2025) 015001 [2405.07455]

2025 arXiv
[23]

Silva, T.M

M.V.d.S. Silva, T.M. Crispim, G. Alencar, R.R. Landim and M.E. Rodrigues, Generalized black-bounces solutions in f(R) gravity and their field sources,Classical and Quantum Gravity43(2026) 015005 [2502.19186]

2026
[24]

Horowitz, D

G.T. Horowitz, D. Marolf, J.E. Santos and D. Wang,Creating a Traversable Wormhole, Classical and Quantum Gravity36(2019) 205011 [1904.02187]

2019 arXiv
[25]

D.-C. Dai, D. Minic and D. Stojkovic,How to form a wormhole,The European Physical Journal C80(2020) 1103 [2010.03947]

2020 arXiv
[26]

Chakrabarti and S

S. Chakrabarti and S. Kar,A wormhole geometry from gravitational collapse,Physical Review D104(2021) 024071 [2106.14761]. 22

2021 arXiv
[27]

Franciolini, L

G. Franciolini, L. Hui, R. Penco, L. Santoni and E. Trincherini,Stable wormholes in scalar-tensor theories,Journal of High Energy Physics2019(2019) 221 [1811.05481]

2019 arXiv
[28]

Hayward, S.-W

S.A. Hayward, S.-W. Kim and H. Lee,Dilatonic wormholes: Construction, operation, maintenance and collapse to black holes,Physical Review D65(2002) 064003 [gr-qc/0110080]

2002 arXiv
[29]

Dotti, J

G. Dotti, J. Oliva and R. Troncoso,Static wormhole solution for higher-dimensional gravity in vacuum,Physical Review D75(2007) 024002 [hep-th/0607062]

2007 arXiv
[30]

Korolev, F.S.N

R. Korolev, F.S.N. Lobo and S.V. Sushkov,Kinetic gravity braiding wormhole geometries,Physical Review D102(2020) 104016 [2009.04829]

2020 arXiv
[31]

Bakopoulos, C

A. Bakopoulos, C. Charmousis and P. Kanti,Traversable wormholes in beyond Horndeski theories,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2022(2022) 022 [2111.09857]

2022 arXiv
[32]

De Falco and S

V. De Falco and S. Capozziello,Static and spherically symmetric wormholes in metric-affine theories of gravity,Physical Review D108(2023) 104030 [2308.05440]

2023 arXiv
[33]

Radhakrishnan, P

R. Radhakrishnan, P. Brown, J. Mutulevich, E. Davis, D. Mirfendereski and G. Cleaver, A Review of Stable, Traversable Wormholes in f(R) Gravity Theories,Symmetry16 (2024) 1007 [2405.05476]

2024 arXiv
[34]

Kumar, S.K

J. Kumar, S.K. Maurya, S. Kiroriwal and S. Chaudhary,Developing a framework for understanding wormholes in modified gravity: A comprehensive review,New Astronomy Reviews98(2024) 101695

2024
[35]

Ziprick and G

J. Ziprick and G. Kunstatter,Quantum Corrected Spherical Collapse: A Phenomenological Framework,Physical Review D82(2010) 044031 [1004.0525]

2010 arXiv
[36]

Louis-Martinez and G

D. Louis-Martinez and G. Kunstatter,Birkhoff’s theorem in two-dimensional dilaton gravity,Physical Review D49(1994) 5227

1994
[37]

Taves and G

T. Taves and G. Kunstatter,Modelling the Evaporation of Non-singular Black Holes, Physical Review D90(2014) 124062 [1408.1444]

2014 arXiv
[38]

Kunstatter, H

G. Kunstatter, H. Maeda and T. Taves,New 2D dilaton gravity for nonsingular black holes,Classical and Quantum Gravity33(2016) 105005 [1509.06746]

2016 arXiv
[39]

Barenboim, A.V

J. Barenboim, A.V. Frolov and G. Kunstatter,No drama in two-dimensional black hole evaporation,Physical Review Research6(2024) L032055 [2405.13373]

2024 arXiv
[40]

Barenboim, A.V

J. Barenboim, A.V. Frolov and G. Kunstatter,Evaporation of regular black holes in 2D dilaton gravity,Physical Review D111(2025) 104068 [2503.03191]

2025 arXiv
[41]

Carballo-Rubio,Master field equations for spherically symmetric gravitational fields beyond general relativity,Nature Communications17(2026) 1399 [2507.15920]

R. Carballo-Rubio,Master field equations for spherically symmetric gravitational fields beyond general relativity,Nature Communications17(2026) 1399 [2507.15920]

2026
[42]

Bueno, P.A

P. Bueno, P.A. Cano, R.A. Hennigar and ´A.J. Murcia,Dynamical Formation of Regular Black Holes,Physical Review Letters134(2025) 181401 [2412.02742]

2025 arXiv
[43]

Bueno, P.A

P. Bueno, P.A. Cano, R.A. Hennigar and ´A.J. Murcia,Regular black holes from thin-shell collapse,Physical Review D111(2025) 104009 [2412.02740]

2025 arXiv
[44]

Frolov, A

V.P. Frolov, A. Koek, J.P. Soto and A. Zelnikov,Regular black holes inspired by quasi-topological gravity,Physical Review D111(2025) 044034 [2411.16050]. 23

2025 arXiv
[45]

Frolov and A

V.P. Frolov and A. Zelnikov,Regular black holes in quasitopological gravity: Null shells and mass inflation,Physical Review D113(2026) 084007 [2601.01861]

2026 arXiv
[46]

Bueno, R.A

P. Bueno, R.A. Hennigar, ´A.J. Murcia and A. Vicente-Cano,Regular Geometries from Singular Matter in Quasi-Topological Gravity, Mar., 2026. 10.48550/arXiv.2603.10110

2026 doi
[47]

Konoplya,Quasinormal modes of four-dimensional regular black holes in quasi-topological gravity: Overtones’ outburst via WKB method,Physics Letters B876 (2026) 140386 [2603.03189]

R.A. Konoplya,Quasinormal modes of four-dimensional regular black holes in quasi-topological gravity: Overtones’ outburst via WKB method,Physics Letters B876 (2026) 140386 [2603.03189]

2026
[48]

Dubinsky,Scattering of a scalar field in the four-dimensional quasi-topological gravity, International Journal of Gravitation and Theoretical Physics2(2026) 6 [2603.17644]

A. Dubinsky,Scattering of a scalar field in the four-dimensional quasi-topological gravity, International Journal of Gravitation and Theoretical Physics2(2026) 6 [2603.17644]

2026
[49]

Bueno, P.A

P. Bueno, P.A. Cano, R.A. Hennigar and ´A.J. Murcia,Regular black hole formation in four-dimensional non-polynomial gravities,Physical Review D113(2026) 024019 [2509.19016]

2026
[50]

Bueno, P.A

P. Bueno, P.A. Cano, R.A. Hennigar and ´A.J. Murcia,Regular Black Holes in Nonlocal Quasitopological Gravity, July, 2026. 10.48550/arXiv.2607.07790

2026 doi arXiv
[51]

Frolov, C.-M

V.P. Frolov, C.-M. Yoo and A. Zelnikov,Vaidya-Type Solutions of Quasitopological Gravity Interacting with Nonlinear Electrodynamics, July, 2026. 10.48550/arXiv.2607.22856

2026 doi arXiv
[52]

Boyanov and R

V. Boyanov and R. Carballo-Rubio,Regular Vaidya solutions of effective gravitational theories,Physical Review Letters136(2026) 171403 [2506.14875]

2026 arXiv
[53]

Alonso-Bardaji and D

A. Alonso-Bardaji and D. Brizuela,Spacetime geometry from canonical spherical gravity, Physical Review D109(2024) 044065 [2310.12951]

2024 arXiv
[54]

Alonso-Bardaji and D

A. Alonso-Bardaji and D. Brizuela,Dynamical theory for spherical black holes in modified gravity,Physical Review D112(2025) 104036 [2507.19380]

2025
[55]

Borissova and R

J. Borissova and R. Carballo-Rubio,Effective geometrodynamics for renormalization-group improved black-hole spacetimes in spherical symmetry,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2026(2026) 023 [2601.17115]

2026 arXiv
[56]

Borissova and R

J. Borissova and R. Carballo-Rubio,Regular black holes from pure gravity in four dimensions,Physical Review D113(2026) 124004 [2602.16773]

2026 arXiv
[57]

Borissova,All2dgeneralised dilaton theories fromd≥4gravities,Physical Review D 113(2026) 124088 [2603.06786]

J. Borissova,All2dgeneralised dilaton theories fromd≥4gravities,Physical Review D 113(2026) 124088 [2603.06786]

2026 arXiv
[58]

Borissova and J

J. Borissova and J. Magueijo,Modified Friedmann equations and non-singular cosmologies ind= 4non-polynomial quasi-topological gravities, Mar., 2026. 10.48550/arXiv.2603.17654

2026 doi arXiv
[59]

Borissova,g ttgrr =−1black hole thermodynamics in extended quasi-topological gravity, Apr., 2026

J. Borissova,g ttgrr =−1black hole thermodynamics in extended quasi-topological gravity, Apr., 2026. 10.48550/arXiv.2604.24101

2026 doi arXiv
[60]

Arrechea, R

J. Arrechea, R. Carballo-Rubio and M. Visser,Effective geometrostatics of spherical stars beyond general relativity, Mar., 2026. 10.48550/arXiv.2603.24269

2026 doi arXiv
[61]

Carballo-Rubio, C

R. Carballo-Rubio, C. Coviello and V. Vellucci,Charging up regular black holes, July,
[62]

Carballo-Rubio and J

R. Carballo-Rubio and J. Mazza, in preparation. 24
[63]

Li and Y.-Q

G. Li and Y.-Q. Wang,Ellis–Bronnikov wormhole in Quasi-topological Gravity, Feb.,
[64]

Simpson and M

A. Simpson and M. Visser,Black-bounce to traversable wormhole,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2019(2019) 042 [1812.07114]

2019 arXiv
[65]

10.48550/arXiv.2602.01029

doi
[66]

Horndeski,Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space, International Journal of Theoretical Physics10(1974) 363

G.W. Horndeski,Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space, International Journal of Theoretical Physics10(1974) 363

1974
[67]

Damour and S.N

T. Damour and S.N. Solodukhin,Wormholes as black hole foils,Physical Review D76 (2007) 024016 [0704.2667]

2007 arXiv
[68]

Lovelock,Dimensionally dependent identities,Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society68(1970) 345

D. Lovelock,Dimensionally dependent identities,Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society68(1970) 345

1970
[69]

Kobayashi,Horndeski theory and beyond: A review,Reports on Progress in Physics 82(2019) 086901

T. Kobayashi,Horndeski theory and beyond: A review,Reports on Progress in Physics 82(2019) 086901

2019
[70]

Takahashi and T

K. Takahashi and T. Kobayashi,Generalized 2D dilaton gravity and KGB,Classical and Quantum Gravity36(2019) 095003 [1812.08847]

2019 arXiv
[71]

Colleaux,Regular black hole and cosmological spacetimes in Non-Polynomial Gravity theories, Ph.D

A. Colleaux,Regular black hole and cosmological spacetimes in Non-Polynomial Gravity theories, Ph.D. thesis, Trento U., 6, 2019

2019
[72]

Deffayet, O

C. Deffayet, O. Pujolas, I. Sawicki and A. Vikman,Imperfect Dark Energy from Kinetic Gravity Braiding,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2010(2010) 026 [1008.0048]

2010 arXiv
[73]

Shams Nejati and M.H

M. Shams Nejati and M.H. Vahidinia,Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity generates Horndeski via disformal transformations,Physics Letters B850(2024) 138499

2024
[74]

Piazza and F

F. Piazza and F. Vernizzi,Effective Field Theory of Cosmological Perturbations, Classical and Quantum Gravity30(2013) 214007 [1307.4350]

2013 arXiv
[75]

Cheung, P

C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and L. Senatore,The Effective Field Theory of Inflation,Journal of High Energy Physics2008(2008) 014 [0709.0293]

2008 arXiv
[76]

Mukohyama, E

S. Mukohyama, E. Seraille, K. Takahashi and V. Yingcharoenrat,Effective field theory of perturbations on arbitrary black hole backgrounds with spacelike scalar profile,Journal of High Energy Physics10(2025) 128 [2507.02066]

2025
[77]

Franciolini, L

G. Franciolini, L. Hui, R. Penco, L. Santoni and E. Trincherini,Effective field theory of black hole quasinormal modes in scalar-tensor theories,Journal of High Energy Physics 2019(2019) 127

2019
[78]

Birkhoff and R.E

G.D. Birkhoff and R.E. Langer,Relativity and Modern Physics, Harvard University Press (1923)

1923
[79]

Jebsen,On the general spherically symmetric solutions of Einstein’s gravitational equations in vacuo,General Relativity and Gravitation37(2005) 2253

J.T. Jebsen,On the general spherically symmetric solutions of Einstein’s gravitational equations in vacuo,General Relativity and Gravitation37(2005) 2253

2005
[80]

Voje Johansen and F

N. Voje Johansen and F. Ravndal,On the discovery of Birkhoff’s theorem,General Relativity and Gravitation38(2006) 537 [physics/0508163]. 25

2006 arXiv
[81]

Deser,Introduction to Jebsen’s paper,General Relativity and Gravitation37(2005) 2251

S. Deser,Introduction to Jebsen’s paper,General Relativity and Gravitation37(2005) 2251

2005
[82]

Frolov and G.A

V.P. Frolov and G.A. Vilkovisky,Spherically symmetric collapse in quantum gravity, Physics Letters B106(1981) 307

1981
[83]

Bardeen,Non-singular general relativistic gravitational collapse, inProceedings of the International Conference GR5, (Tblisi, Georgia), Tbilisi University Press, 1968

J.M. Bardeen,Non-singular general relativistic gravitational collapse, inProceedings of the International Conference GR5, (Tblisi, Georgia), Tbilisi University Press, 1968

1968
[84]

Hayward,Formation and evaporation of non-singular black holes,Physical Review Letters96(2006) 031103 [gr-qc/0506126]

S.A. Hayward,Formation and evaporation of non-singular black holes,Physical Review Letters96(2006) 031103 [gr-qc/0506126]

2006 arXiv
[85]

Dymnikova,Vacuum nonsingular black hole,General Relativity and Gravitation24 (1992) 235

I. Dymnikova,Vacuum nonsingular black hole,General Relativity and Gravitation24 (1992) 235

1992
[86]

Fels and C.G

M.E. Fels and C.G. Torre,The Principle of Symmetric Criticality in General Relativity, Classical and Quantum Gravity19(2002) 641 [gr-qc/0108033]

2002 arXiv
[87]

Palais,The principle of symmetric criticality,Communications in Mathematical Physics69(1979) 19

R.S. Palais,The principle of symmetric criticality,Communications in Mathematical Physics69(1979) 19

1979
[88]

Hochberg and M

D. Hochberg and M. Visser,Geometric structure of the generic static traversable wormhole throat,Physical Review D56(1997) 4745 [gr-qc/9704082]

1997 arXiv
[89]

Deser and B

S. Deser and B. Tekin,Shortcuts to high symmetry solutions in gravitational theories, Classical and Quantum Gravity20(2003) 4877 [gr-qc/0306114]

2003 arXiv
[90]

Simpson, P

A. Simpson, P. Martin-Moruno and M. Visser,Vaidya spacetimes, black-bounces, and traversable wormholes,Classical and Quantum Gravity36(2019) 145007 [1902.04232]

2019 arXiv
[91]

McNutt, W

D.D. McNutt, W. Julius, M. Gorban, B. Mattingly, P. Brown and G. Cleaver,Geometric surfaces: An invariant characterization of spherically symmetric black hole horizons and wormhole throats,Physical Review D103(2021) 124024 [2104.08935]

2021 arXiv
[92]

Shaikh, K

R. Shaikh, K. Pal, K. Pal and T. Sarkar,Constraining alternatives to the Kerr black hole,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society506(2021) 1229 [2102.04299]

2021 arXiv
[93]

Mazza, E

J. Mazza, E. Franzin and S. Liberati,A novel family of rotating black hole mimickers, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2021(2021) 082 [2102.01105]

2021 arXiv
[94]

Lobo, M.E

F.S.N. Lobo, M.E. Rodrigues, M.V.d.S. Silva, A. Simpson and M. Visser,Novel black-bounce spacetimes: Wormholes, regularity, energy conditions, and causal structure, Physical Review D103(2021) 084052 [2009.12057]

2021 arXiv
[95]

Franzin, S

E. Franzin, S. Liberati, J. Mazza, A. Simpson and M. Visser,Charged black-bounce spacetimes,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2021(2021) 036 [2104.11376]

2021 arXiv
[96]

Bronnikov, H

K.A. Bronnikov, H. Dehnen and V.N. Melnikov,Regular black holes and black universes, General Relativity and Gravitation39(2007) 973 [gr-qc/0611022]

2007 arXiv
[97]

Bronnikov and J.C

K.A. Bronnikov and J.C. Fabris,Regular phantom black holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 251101 [gr-qc/0511109]

2006 arXiv
[98]

Ellis,Ether flow through a drainhole: A particle model in general relativity,Journal of Mathematical Physics14(1973) 104

H.G. Ellis,Ether flow through a drainhole: A particle model in general relativity,Journal of Mathematical Physics14(1973) 104. 26

1973
[99]

Bronnikov and E.V

K.A. Bronnikov and E.V. Donskoy,Black universes with trapped ghosts,Gravitation and Cosmology17(2011) 176 [1110.6030]

2011 arXiv
[100]

Mazza,Into the Heart of Darkness: Theory and Phenomenology of Regular Black Holes, Ph.D

J. Mazza,Into the Heart of Darkness: Theory and Phenomenology of Regular Black Holes, Ph.D. thesis, Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (SISSA), Trieste, Sept., 2023

2023
[101]

Bronnikov,Scalar-tensor theory and scalar charge,Acta Phys

K.A. Bronnikov,Scalar-tensor theory and scalar charge,Acta Phys. Polon. B4(1973) 251

1973
[102]

Bronnikov,Regular Magnetic Black Holes and Monopoles from Nonlinear Electrodynamics,Physical Review D63(2001) 044005 [gr-qc/0006014]

K.A. Bronnikov,Regular Magnetic Black Holes and Monopoles from Nonlinear Electrodynamics,Physical Review D63(2001) 044005 [gr-qc/0006014]

2001 arXiv
[103]

Ay´ on-Beato and A

E. Ay´ on-Beato and A. Garc´ ıa,The Bardeen Model as a Nonlinear Magnetic Monopole, Physics Letters B493(2000) 149 [gr-qc/0009077]

2000 arXiv
[104]

Fan and X

Z.-Y. Fan and X. Wang,Construction of Regular Black Holes in General Relativity, Physical Review D94(2016) 124027 [1610.02636]

2016 arXiv
[105]

Balart and E.C

L. Balart and E.C. Vagenas,Regular black holes with a nonlinear electrodynamics source, Physical Review D90(2014) 124045 [1408.0306]

2014 arXiv
[106]

Bronnikov,Regular Black Holes Sourced by Nonlinear Electrodynamics, inRegular Black Holes: Towards a New Paradigm of Gravitational Collapse, C

K.A. Bronnikov,Regular Black Holes Sourced by Nonlinear Electrodynamics, inRegular Black Holes: Towards a New Paradigm of Gravitational Collapse, C. Bambi, ed., Springer Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology, (Singapore), pp. 37–67, Springer Nature (2023), DOI

2023
[107]

Bronnikov,Nonlinear electrodynamics, regular black holes and wormholes, International Journal of Modern Physics D27(2018) 1841005 [1711.00087]

K.A. Bronnikov,Nonlinear electrodynamics, regular black holes and wormholes, International Journal of Modern Physics D27(2018) 1841005 [1711.00087]

2018 arXiv
[108]

Vaidya,The external field of a radiating star in general relativity,Current Science 12(1943) 183

P.C. Vaidya,The external field of a radiating star in general relativity,Current Science 12(1943) 183

1943
[109]

Jacobson,Initial value constraints with tensor matter,Class

T. Jacobson,Initial value constraints with tensor matter,Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 245011 [1108.1496]

2011 arXiv
[110]

Vaidya,The Gravitational Field of a Radiating Star,Proc

P.C. Vaidya,The Gravitational Field of a Radiating Star,Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India A 33(1951) 264

1951
[111]

Vaidya,The External Field of a Radiating Star in General Relativity,General Relativity and Gravitation31(1999) 119

P.C. Vaidya,The External Field of a Radiating Star in General Relativity,General Relativity and Gravitation31(1999) 119

1999
[112]

Vaidya,Nonstatic Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations for Spheres of Fluids Radiating Energy,Physical Review83(1951) 10

P.C. Vaidya,Nonstatic Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations for Spheres of Fluids Radiating Energy,Physical Review83(1951) 10

1951
[113]

Vaidya,The Gravitational Field of a Radiating Star,General Relativity and Gravitation31(1999) 121

P.C. Vaidya,The Gravitational Field of a Radiating Star,General Relativity and Gravitation31(1999) 121

1999
[114]

Iyer and C.V

B.R. Iyer and C.V. Vishveshwara,The Vaidya solution in higher dimensions,Pramana 32(1989) 749

1989
[115]

Wang and Y

A. Wang and Y. Wu,Generalized Vaidya Solutions,General Relativity and Gravitation 31(1999) 107 [gr-qc/9803038]

1999 arXiv
[116]

Hochberg and M

D. Hochberg and M. Visser,Dynamic wormholes, anti-trapped surfaces, and energy conditions,Physical Review D58(1998) 044021 [gr-qc/9802046]. 27

1998 arXiv
[117]

Hayward,Dynamic wormholes,International Journal of Modern Physics D08 (1999) 373 [gr-qc/9805019]

S.A. Hayward,Dynamic wormholes,International Journal of Modern Physics D08 (1999) 373 [gr-qc/9805019]

1999 arXiv
[118]

Tomikawa, K

Y. Tomikawa, K. Izumi and T. Shiromizu,New definition of wormhole throat,Physical Review D91(2015) 104008

2015
[119]

Hochberg and M

D. Hochberg and M. Visser,The Null energy condition in dynamic wormholes,Physical Review Letters81(1998) 746 [gr-qc/9802048]

1998 arXiv
[121]

Filippo, D

F.D. Filippo, D. Kubiznak and A. Srinivasan,On mass inflation and thin shells in quasi-topological gravity, Apr., 2026. 10.48550/arXiv.2604.27980. 28

2026 doi arXiv
[2026]

10.48550/arXiv.2607.07831

doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Einstein and N

A. Einstein and N. Rosen,The Particle Problem in the General Theory of Relativity, Physical Review48(1935) 73

1935

[2] [2]

Flamm,Beitr¨ age zur Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie,Physikalische Zeitschrift XVII(1916) 448

L. Flamm,Beitr¨ age zur Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie,Physikalische Zeitschrift XVII(1916) 448

1916

[3] [3]

Flamm,Republication of: Contributions to Einstein’s theory of gravitation,General Relativity and Gravitation47(2015) 72

L. Flamm,Republication of: Contributions to Einstein’s theory of gravitation,General Relativity and Gravitation47(2015) 72

2015

[4] [4]

Gibbons,Editorial note to: Ludwig Flamm, Contributions to Einstein’s theory of gravitation,General Relativity and Gravitation47(2015) 71

G.W. Gibbons,Editorial note to: Ludwig Flamm, Contributions to Einstein’s theory of gravitation,General Relativity and Gravitation47(2015) 71

2015

[5] [5]

Morris and K.S

M.S. Morris and K.S. Thorne,Wormholes in spacetime and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity,American Journal of Physics56(1988) 395

1988

[6] [6]

Visser,Lorentzian Wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking, American Institute of Physics (1996)

M. Visser,Lorentzian Wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking, American Institute of Physics (1996)

1996

[7] [7]

Lobo,Exotic solutions in General Relativity: Traversable wormholes and ’warp drive’ spacetimes, inClassical and Quantum Gravity Research Progress, pp

F.S.N. Lobo,Exotic solutions in General Relativity: Traversable wormholes and ’warp drive’ spacetimes, inClassical and Quantum Gravity Research Progress, pp. 1–78, arXiv (2007), DOI [0710.4474]

arXiv 2007

[8] [8]

Lobo, ed.,Wormholes, Warp Drives and Energy Conditions, vol

F.S.N. Lobo, ed.,Wormholes, Warp Drives and Energy Conditions, vol. 189 of Fundamental Theories of Physics, Springer (2017), 10.1007/978-3-319-55182-1

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55182-1 2017