REVIEW 2 cited by
Intrinsic dimension of data representations in deep neural networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep neural networks progressively transform their inputs across multiple processing layers. What are the geometrical properties of the representations learned by these networks? Here we study the intrinsic dimensionality (ID) of data-representations, i.e. the minimal number of parameters needed to describe a representation. We find that, in a trained network, the ID is orders of magnitude smaller than the number of units in each layer. Across layers, the ID first increases and then progressively decreases in the final layers. Remarkably, the ID of the last hidden layer predicts classification accuracy on the test set. These results can neither be found by linear dimensionality estimates (e.g., with principal component analysis), nor in representations that had been artificially linearized. They are neither found in untrained networks, nor in networks that are trained on randomized labels. This suggests that neural networks that can generalize are those that transform the data into low-dimensional, but not necessarily flat manifolds.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Redundancy, Isotropy, and Intrinsic Dimensionality of Prompt-based Text Embeddings
Prompt-based text embeddings can be truncated to a small fraction of their dimensions with little performance loss on classification and clustering, but retrieval and STS degrade faster; the difference tracks lower in...
-
Isotropy Cliffs: The Geometric Signature of Decision-Making in Large Language Models
Across five LLMs, a sharp decrease in embedding isotropy at a critical layer predicts multiple-choice accuracy, with Spearman correlations up to -0.92.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.