REVIEW 3 cited by
Coarse Graining with Neural Operators for Simulating Chaotic Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Accurately predicting the long-term behavior of chaotic systems is crucial for various applications such as climate modeling. However, achieving such predictions typically requires iterative computations over a dense spatiotemporal grid to account for the unstable nature of chaotic systems, which is expensive and impractical in many real-world situations. An alternative approach to such a full-resolved simulation is using a coarse grid and then correcting its errors through a \textit{closure model}, which approximates the overall information from fine scales not captured in the coarse-grid simulation. Recently, ML approaches have been used for closure modeling, but they typically require a large number of training samples from expensive fully-resolved simulations (FRS). In this work, we prove an even more fundamental limitation, i.e., the standard approach to learning closure models suffers from a large approximation error for generic problems, no matter how large the model is, and it stems from the non-uniqueness of the mapping. We propose an alternative end-to-end learning approach using a physics-informed neural operator (PINO) that overcomes this limitation by not using a closure model or a coarse-grid solver. We first train the PINO model on data from a coarse-grid solver and then fine-tune it with (a small amount of) FRS and physics-based losses on a fine grid. The discretization-free nature of neural operators means that they do not suffer from the restriction of a coarse grid that closure models face, and they can provably approximate the long-term statistics of chaotic systems. In our experiments, our PINO model achieves a 330x speedup compared to FRS with a relative error $\sim 10\%$. In contrast, the closure model coupled with a coarse-grid solver is $60$x slower than PINO while having a much higher error $\sim186\%$ when the closure model is trained on the same FRS dataset.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Maximal Update Parametrization and Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfer for Fourier Neural Operators
The authors derive and test a parametrization for FNOs that keeps optimal hyperparameters stable as the number of Fourier modes grows, enabling zero-shot transfer from small proxy models to near-billion-parameter models.
-
Modeling turbulent and self-gravitating fluids with Fourier neural operators
Fourier neural operators trained on 2D projected views of 3D astrophysical simulations can forecast subsequent projected density and velocity snapshots with 5-25% RMS error, though a constant hidden magnetic field mea...
-
TensorGRaD: Tensor Gradient Robust Decomposition for Memory-Efficient Neural Operator Training
TensorGRaD compresses tensor gradients into low-rank plus sparse pieces and shows this cuts optimizer memory by up to 75% for Fourier neural operators without hurting test error.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.