Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Vision-Based Anti Unmanned Aerial Technology: Opportunities and Challenges

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review compiles vision-based anti-UAV detection and tracking work into a dataset index, method families, and seven open research directions.

desk verdict Useful survey scaffolding, shaky dataset index: fix the stats and links before relying on it. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.10006 v1 pith:GCKBBLZ7 submitted 2025-07-14 cs.CV

Guanghai Ding , Yihua Ren , Yuting Liu , Qijun Zhao , Shuiwang Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords anti-UAVUAVdetectiontrackinginfraredsmalltargetdatasetsurveyYOLOdetectorsSiamesetrackersmultimodalfusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is a review of computer-vision methods for detecting and tracking unauthorized drones (UAVs). It assembles publicly available RGB, infrared, and multimodal datasets used to train and test such systems, gives their access links, and organizes recent detection and tracking algorithms into families with reported performance figures. The intended service to the field is an index: a researcher facing the anti-UAV problem can use this paper to pick a dataset, choose a method baseline, and see where the open difficulties lie. The paper also defines the evaluation metrics used by these methods and closes by proposing seven future research directions. Its value therefore rests on whether the compiled dataset statistics, links, and method summaries are accurate and representative.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing organizational device is a two-part dataset index: Table I lists each dataset's scene, type and total size, modality, complexity, UAV type, and whether it is multimodal, while Table II lists its source, public link, and access date. On the method side, the organizing device is a four-family taxonomy of detection and tracking approaches, with Table III linking each method to the datasets it was tested on and the results it reports. The review also turns evaluation practice into a shared vocabulary by giving formulas for state accuracy, tracking accuracy, MOTA, AP, mAP, precision, recall, F1, FPS, and target coverage rate. These devices carry the argument because the paper's contribution is precisely the structured assembly of scattered datasets and methods.

What would settle it

Visit the listed repositories and compare each row of Table I and Table II with the primary source: the DUT Anti-UAV row is a concrete test, since Section III says the detection subset contains 10,000 images while Table I lists 1,000, and the printed URL for the Anti2 dataset in Table II contains an embedded space that would break navigation. If several such mismatches or dead links appear, the paper's central claim of providing effective dataset links and reliable statistics fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is organizational: the current state of vision-based anti-UAV detection and tracking can be captured by a structured dataset index and a method taxonomy. Table I and Table II list twenty public datasets with their scene types, modalities, sizes, UAV types, and access links, while the accompanying text notes the strengths and limits of each dataset. The method section groups recent work into UAV-based detection, mostly YOLO-family detectors modified with attention mechanisms, lightweight heads, and small-target losses, and UAV-based tracking, divided into Siamese, self-attention or Transformer, and vision-fusion approaches. For each method the paper reports the performance claimed on one or more of these datasets, and it defines the evaluation metrics, including a state accuracy formula for trackers that must handle target disappearance. It then names seven future directions, from balancing real-time operation with accuracy to legal and privacy constraints on anti-UAV systems.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's usefulness as an index depends on the compiled dataset statistics, method summaries, and public links being accurate and accessible.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A researcher can use the dataset table as a launch point for benchmarking, with each dataset tied to its scene type, modality, and stated difficulty.
  • New detection papers can be positioned against the YOLO-family improvements the paper summarizes, such as attention modules, small-object detection heads, and lightweight backbones, using the reported mAP and AP values as baselines.
  • Trackers are separated into Siamese, self-attention, and vision-fusion families, which makes it easier to see which architectural choices address which failure modes, such as occlusion, target disappearance, and small-target drift.
  • The evaluation metrics section gives a common language for comparing trackers that must report not only localization but also whether the target is absent, a central requirement for realistic anti-UAV scenarios.
  • The seven proposed directions, including real-time and accuracy balance, multimodal fusion, multi-UAV confusion, deformation modeling, and legal constraints, form a concrete agenda for the next wave of work.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • As an editorial extension, the same index could evolve into a live benchmark resource that tracks dataset versions, license terms, and link status, since several listed datasets live on institutional pages that may move or change over time.
  • As an editorial inference, the reported method results come from different training splits and evaluation protocols, so direct cross-method comparison from the tables is unsafe without recalibration on shared subsets; a standardized evaluation protocol would make the survey more actionable.
  • As an editorial extension, the paper's list of failure modes suggests a convergent design, in which future anti-UAV trackers combine a lightweight detector, a Siamese or attention-based tracker, and a global re-detection module, with each component addressing a different listed weakness.
  • As an editorial inference, the legal and ethical research direction implies that deployed systems will be evaluated by privacy compliance and authorization rules as much as by detection accuracy, a consequence the paper names but does not develop.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a survey of vision-based Anti-UAV detection and tracking. It reviews threat categories and sensing modalities, compiles nineteen datasets with descriptions in Table I and public links in Table II, categorizes recent methods into UAV-based detection (mainly YOLO variants) and three tracking families (Siamese, self-attention, vision fusion), reports representative results in Table III, defines evaluation metrics, discusses dataset and method limitations, and proposes seven future research directions. The paper's central value is as a compiled index of datasets, methods, and benchmark numbers.

Significance. If the compilation were reliable, the paper would serve as a convenient entry point for researchers: it gathers recent 2020--2025 datasets, links them, summarizes representative detection and tracking methods, and names concrete future directions such as multimodal fusion and deformation-aware tracking. The paper contains no new experiments or derivations, so its contribution rests on the accuracy and completeness of its tables and citations. That load-bearing premise is currently weakened by several internal inconsistencies in the dataset statistics, URLs, and method attributions. The inconsistencies are correctable, and the underlying taxonomy and future-direction discussion are reasonable; I therefore evaluate this as a fixable manuscript rather than one with a fundamentally flawed central idea.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section III vs. Table I] The DUT Anti-UAV entry is inconsistent: the text states the detection subset consists of 10,000 images with a 5,200/2,600/2,200 train/val/test split, while Table I reports 'Image 1,000' and omits the split. These cannot both be correct. Since Table I is the paper's dataset index, the authors must verify the count against the original source and correct one entry, or explain the discrepancy.
  2. [Section IV.A and reference [96]] The text attributes ISTD-DETR to 'Yuan et al. [96]', but reference [96] is authored by Yang, Wang, Bo, and Wang (Neurocomputing, 2025). The in-text attribution or the reference entry must be corrected. This matters because the paper's contribution is a reliable summary of recent methods, and an author-name mismatch undermines that reliability.
  3. [Section IV.A and Table III] The RF-vision fusion method of Xie et al. [80] is described in the text without a model name, but Table III lists an 'ISD-UNet' row under the tracking section with TCR and AP results attributed to [80]. Please clarify whether ISD-UNet is the proposed method name, whether it belongs in the detection or tracking category, and align the text and table so the mapping from method to result is unambiguous.
  4. [Section IV.C, Eq. (1)] The text before Eq. (1) says 'a comprehensive evaluation index State Accuracy (SA) is proposed in this paper,' but the equation is explicitly cited to [17] and the surrounding text also cites [17] for the same metric. This is an internal attribution conflict: either remove the local-proposal claim or provide a genuinely new definition. As written, the paper claims novelty for a borrowed metric.
  5. [Section IV.B.1] The paragraph describing SiamDT states 'Author proposed a Anti-UA V tracking algorithm named SiamDT' without naming the authors. In a survey whose contribution is method attribution, an unresolved placeholder is not acceptable; replace it with the actual authors or a proper citation (Table III currently attributes the method to [17]).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table II] The table header 'Access Data' should be 'Access Date', and several URLs contain embedded spaces that likely break the links, e.g., github.com/gdpinntit/-anti-interference-and-anti-UA V-dataset and github.com/UA V DetectionThesis/UA V -detection-dataset. The authors should re-check the exact URLs and verify that they resolve.
  2. [Section III and Table I] There are several typos in the dataset entries: 'he detection subset' should be 'The detection subset', 'ICG-Dron' should be 'ICG-Drone', and 'DJl' appears multiple times where 'DJI' is intended.
  3. [Table III] The dataset label 'Real ward [43]' in the YOLOv8-E row should be 'Real World [43]' to match Table I and the text.
  4. [Section IV.C, Eqs. (4)--(5)] Eq. (4) defines Accuracy, but the sentence introducing Eq. (5) refers to 'The accuracy measure [127]' while Eq. (5) is the standard Precision formula. Please re-label the equations and their introductory sentences so Accuracy and Precision are not conflated.
  5. [Section II.B and Section IV] The categories 'UA V-based Detection methods' and 'UA V-based Tracking methods' are confusing because the methods are vision-based, not UAV-based. Consider renaming them 'Vision-based detection' and 'Vision-based tracking' to match the paper's own framing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reasoning: the paper is a survey with externally sourced dataset statistics, method summaries, and metric definitions; internal inconsistencies are accuracy issues, not circularity.

full rationale

This manuscript is a literature review and compilation, not a derivation. It does not fit parameters, derive predictions from assumptions, or invoke a uniqueness theorem. The dataset descriptions, method summaries, and performance numbers are presented as collected from external papers and benchmarks. The seven future research directions are prose suggestions rather than results derived from the paper's own premises. The only passage that could superficially resemble circularity is the claim that the State Accuracy (SA) metric is 'proposed in this paper' immediately followed by citation [17]; however, Eq. (1) is simply quoted as an external evaluation metric, and the surrounding text attributes it to the cited benchmark. This is an attribution inconsistency, not a circular derivation, because the metric is not derived from anything in the present paper. The noted internal contradictions (e.g., DUT Anti-UAV image counts differing between Section III and Table I, and URLs with embedded spaces in Table II) and the apparent mismatch between the text's attribution of ISTD-DETR to Yuan et al. and reference [96] listing Yang et al. are substantive correctness and quality concerns for a survey whose value depends on accurate indexing, but they are not circularity under the defined patterns. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own input, so the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted: the paper is a review without numerical derivations. The axioms are the background assumptions any secondary survey makes: fidelity to cited sources, accessible links, and representative selection. No new entities (particles, mechanisms, etc.) are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The descriptions and performance numbers of cited methods and datasets are faithful transcriptions of the original papers.
    The review's value as a secondary source depends on accurate reporting; Section III and Table III reproduce third-party statistics.
  • domain assumption The public dataset URLs in Table II are usable and stable as listed.
    The paper's stated contribution of helping researchers access datasets requires working links; several URLs in Table II appear with embedded spaces.
  • domain assumption The chosen datasets and methods are representative of the field.
    No explicit inclusion or exclusion criteria are stated for dataset and method selection, so the review assumes its selection covers the important work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Vision-Based Anti Unmanned Aerial Technology: Opportunities and Challenges." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GCKBBLZ7

@misc{pith2026250710006,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Vision-Based Anti Unmanned Aerial Technology: Opportunities and Challenges},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GCKBBLZ7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.10006}
}
read the original abstract

With the rapid advancement of UAV technology and its extensive application in various fields such as military reconnaissance, environmental monitoring, and logistics, achieving efficient and accurate Anti-UAV tracking has become essential. The importance of Anti-UAV tracking is increasingly prominent, especially in scenarios such as public safety, border patrol, search and rescue, and agricultural monitoring, where operations in complex environments can provide enhanced security. Current mainstream Anti-UAV tracking technologies are primarily centered around computer vision techniques, particularly those that integrate multi-sensor data fusion with advanced detection and tracking algorithms. This paper first reviews the characteristics and current challenges of Anti-UAV detection and tracking technologies. Next, it investigates and compiles several publicly available datasets, providing accessible links to support researchers in efficiently addressing related challenges. Furthermore, the paper analyzes the major vision-based and vision-fusion-based Anti-UAV detection and tracking algorithms proposed in recent years. Finally, based on the above research, this paper outlines future research directions, aiming to provide valuable insights for advancing the field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.10006 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Major categories of UAV threats:Airspace Interference, Espionage Threats, Security Threats, Public Safety. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Some characteristics of UAV detection and tracking, with the Chinese [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Some example images from the aforementioned datasets. The Chinese characters in the image represent the time and location of the shooting of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A General Review of Anti-UAV Detection and Tracking Methods in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SkyEV: RGB-Event UAV detection and tracking dataset and baseline

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper introduces SkyEV, a 2.17-hour RGB-event drone detection dataset with ego-motion and varied optics, plus a SAST+YOLOX fusion baseline.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

147 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [17]

    Anti-uav410: A thermal infrared benchmark and customized scheme for tracking drones in the wild,

    B. Huang, J. Li, J. Chen, G. Wang, J. Zhao, and T. Xu, “Anti-uav410: A thermal infrared benchmark and customized scheme for tracking drones in the wild,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 2852–2865, 2023

    2023

  2. [96]

    Istd-detr: A deep learning algorithm based on detr and super-resolution for infrared small target detection,

    H. Yang, J. Wang, Y . Bo, and J. Wang, “Istd-detr: A deep learning algorithm based on detr and super-resolution for infrared small target detection,” Neurocomputing, vol. 621, p. 129289, 2025

    work page 2025

  3. [80]

    A rf-visual di- rectional fusion framework for precise uav positioning,

    W. Xie, Y . Wan, G. Wu, Y . Li, F. Zhou, and Q. Wu, “A rf-visual di- rectional fusion framework for precise uav positioning,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [1]

    Public perception of remotely piloted aircraft systems in canada,

    N. Tepylo, L. Debelle, and J. Laliberte, “Public perception of remotely piloted aircraft systems in canada,” Technology in Society , vol. 73, p. 102242, 2023

    2023

  5. [2]

    Unsupervised aerial– ground re-identification from pedestrian to group for uav-based surveil- lance,

    L. Mei, Y . Cheng, H. Chen, L. Jia, and Y . Yu, “Unsupervised aerial– ground re-identification from pedestrian to group for uav-based surveil- lance,” Drones, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 244, 2025. 16

    2025

  6. [3]

    A secure and intelligent data sharing scheme for uav-assisted disaster rescue,

    Y . Wang, Z. Su, Q. Xu, R. Li, T. H. Luan, and P. Wang, “A secure and intelligent data sharing scheme for uav-assisted disaster rescue,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 2422–2438, 2023

    2023

  7. [4]

    Wheatnet: A lightweight convolutional neural network for high-throughput image-based wheat head detection and counting,

    S. Khaki, N. Safaei, H. Pham, and L. Wang, “Wheatnet: A lightweight convolutional neural network for high-throughput image-based wheat head detection and counting,” Neurocomputing, vol. 489, pp. 78–89, 2022

    2022

  8. [5]

    Security challenges for drone communications: Possible threats, attacks and countermeasures,

    M. Krichen, W. Y . H. Adoni, A. Mihoub, M. Y . Alzahrani, and T. Nah- hal, “Security challenges for drone communications: Possible threats, attacks and countermeasures,” in 2022 2nd International conference of smart systems and emerging technologies (SMARTTECH) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 184–189

    2022

Show all 147 references
  1. [6]

    Vision-based drone detection in complex environments: A survey,

    Z. Liu, P. An, Y . Yang, S. Qiu, Q. Liu, and X. Xu, “Vision-based drone detection in complex environments: A survey,” Drones, vol. 8, no. 11, p. 643, 2024

    2024

  2. [7]

    Deep learning for unmanned aerial vehicles detection: A review,

    N. Al-lQubaydhi, A. Alenezi, T. Alanazi, A. Senyor, N. Alanezi, B. Alotaibi, M. Alotaibi, A. Razaque, and S. Hariri, “Deep learning for unmanned aerial vehicles detection: A review,” Computer Science Review, vol. 51, p. 100614, 2024

    2024

  3. [8]

    Machine learning model for leak detection using water pipeline vibration sensor,

    S. Lee and B. Kim, “Machine learning model for leak detection using water pipeline vibration sensor,”Sensors, vol. 23, no. 21, p. 8935, 2023

    2023

  4. [9]

    Perdet: machine-learning-based uav gps spoofing detection using perception data,

    X. Wei, Y . Wang, and C. Sun, “Perdet: machine-learning-based uav gps spoofing detection using perception data,” Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no. 19, p. 4925, 2022

    2022

  5. [10]

    Biomimetic swarm fission driven algorithm with preassigned target subgroup size,

    H. Cai, H. Wang, Z. Bei, D. Zhou, and H. Gao, “Biomimetic swarm fission driven algorithm with preassigned target subgroup size,” Bioin- spiration & Biomimetics , 2025

    2025

  6. [11]

    A survey on security of unmanned aerial vehicle systems: Attacks and countermeasures,

    X. Wei, J. Ma, and C. Sun, “A survey on security of unmanned aerial vehicle systems: Attacks and countermeasures,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , 2024

    2024

  7. [12]

    Thinking about anti-drone strategies,

    L. Wang, J. Luo, Z. Li, M. Wang, R. Li, W. Xu, F. He, and B. Xu, “Thinking about anti-drone strategies,” in2024 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things and Cloud Computing Technology (AIoTC). IEEE, 2024, pp. 53–56

    2024

  8. [13]

    Drone detection and tracking in real-time by fusion of different sensing modalities,

    F. Svanstr ¨om, F. Alonso-Fernandez, and C. Englund, “Drone detection and tracking in real-time by fusion of different sensing modalities,” Drones, vol. 6, no. 11, p. 317, 2022

    2022

  9. [14]

    Object detection methods for improving uav autonomy and remote sensing applications,

    P. Aposporis, “Object detection methods for improving uav autonomy and remote sensing applications,” in 2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). IEEE, 2020, pp. 845–853

    2020

  10. [15]

    Radar-based uav swarm surveillance based on a two-stage wave path difference estimation method,

    Y . Li, M. Fu, H. Sun, Z. Deng, and Y . Zhang, “Radar-based uav swarm surveillance based on a two-stage wave path difference estimation method,” IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 4268–4280, 2022

    2022

  11. [16]

    Deep learning-based drone acoustic event detection system for microphone arrays,

    Y . Sun, J. Li, L. Wang, J. Xv, and Y . Liu, “Deep learning-based drone acoustic event detection system for microphone arrays,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 83, no. 16, pp. 47 865–47 887, 2024

    2024

  12. [18]

    Thermal infrared target tracking: A comprehensive review,

    D. Yuan, H. Zhang, X. Shu, Q. Liu, X. Chang, Z. He, and G. Shi, “Thermal infrared target tracking: A comprehensive review,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , vol. 73, pp. 1–19, 2023

    2023

  13. [19]

    Deep learning for visual tracking: A comprehensive survey,

    S. M. Marvasti-Zadeh, L. Cheng, H. Ghanei-Yakhdan, and S. Kasaei, “Deep learning for visual tracking: A comprehensive survey,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 3943–3968, 2021

    2021

  14. [20]

    Drone based rgbt tracking with dual-feature aggregation network,

    Z. Gao, D. Li, G. Wen, Y . Kuai, and R. Chen, “Drone based rgbt tracking with dual-feature aggregation network,” Drones, vol. 7, no. 9, p. 585, 2023

    2023

  15. [21]

    Correlation filter based single object tracking: A review,

    A. Kumar, R. V ohra, R. Jain, M. Li, C. Gan, and D. K. Jain, “Correlation filter based single object tracking: A review,” Information Fusion, p. 102562, 2024

    2024

  16. [22]

    Robust small infrared target detection using weighted adaptive ring top-hat transformation,

    Y . Li, Z. Li, J. Li, J. Yang, and A. Siddique, “Robust small infrared target detection using weighted adaptive ring top-hat transformation,” Signal Processing, vol. 217, p. 109339, 2024

    2024

  17. [23]

    Detection and classification of multirotor drones in radar sensor networks: A review,

    A. Coluccia, G. Parisi, and A. Fascista, “Detection and classification of multirotor drones in radar sensor networks: A review,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 15, p. 4172, 2020

    2020

  18. [24]

    Diat-radsatnet—a novel lightweight dcnn architecture for micro-doppler-based small unmanned aerial vehicle (suav) targets’ detection and classification,

    H. C. Kumawat, M. Chakraborty, and A. A. B. Raj, “Diat-radsatnet—a novel lightweight dcnn architecture for micro-doppler-based small unmanned aerial vehicle (suav) targets’ detection and classification,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , vol. 71, pp. 1–11, 2022

    2022

  19. [25]

    Deep learning-based uav detection in pulse-doppler radar,

    C. Wang, J. Tian, J. Cao, and X. Wang, “Deep learning-based uav detection in pulse-doppler radar,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 60, pp. 1–12, 2021

    2021

  20. [26]

    Survey of infrared dim small target detection algorithm based on deep learning,

    H.-h. Wang, D. Cao, Y . Zhao, and Y . Yang, “Survey of infrared dim small target detection algorithm based on deep learning,” Laser Infrared, vol. 9, pp. 1275–1279, 2022

    2022

  21. [27]

    Yolo-drone: an optimized yolov8 network for tiny uav object detection,

    X. Zhai, Z. Huang, T. Li, H. Liu, and S. Wang, “Yolo-drone: an optimized yolov8 network for tiny uav object detection,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 17, p. 3664, 2023

    2023

  22. [28]

    Anti-drone detection in aerial multispectral images,

    F. Xu, Z. Lin, C. Chen, R. Yang, and H. Zhai, “Anti-drone detection in aerial multispectral images,” in IGARSS 2024-2024 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium . IEEE, 2024, pp. 9388– 9391

    2024

  23. [29]

    Advanced wavelet transform-based automated system for drone state identification using radio-frequency signal,

    R. R. Sharma, K. Gurjar, B. Bhagat, and A. Pramod, “Advanced wavelet transform-based automated system for drone state identification using radio-frequency signal,” Journal of Aerospace Information Systems , vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 951–957, 2024

    2024

  24. [30]

    Rf-enabled deep-learning-assisted drone detection and identification: An end-to-end approach,

    S. S. Alam, A. Chakma, M. H. Rahman, R. Bin Mofidul, M. M. Alam, I. B. K. Y . Utama, and Y . M. Jang, “Rf-enabled deep-learning-assisted drone detection and identification: An end-to-end approach,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 9, p. 4202, 2023

    2023

  25. [31]

    A review of rf based drone detection, direction of arrival and identification techniques,

    Y . N. Jurn, Z. T. Ibraheem, and N. D. Zaki, “A review of rf based drone detection, direction of arrival and identification techniques,” in 2024 IEEE 14th International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 162–167

    2024

  26. [32]

    Practical study of recurrent neural networks for efficient real-time drone sound detection: a review. drones 7 (1), 26 (2023)

    D. Utebayeva, L. Ilipbayeva, and E. Matson, “Practical study of recurrent neural networks for efficient real-time drone sound detection: a review. drones 7 (1), 26 (2023).”

    2023

  27. [33]

    Drone sound detection system based on feature result-level fusion using deep learning,

    Q. Dong, Y . Liu, and X. Liu, “Drone sound detection system based on feature result-level fusion using deep learning,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 149–171, 2023

    2023

  28. [34]

    The sound of surveillance: Enhancing machine learning- driven drone detection with advanced acoustic augmentation,

    S. K ¨ummritz, “The sound of surveillance: Enhancing machine learning- driven drone detection with advanced acoustic augmentation,” Drones, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 105, 2024

    2024

  29. [35]

    Review of infrared object detection al- gorithms for low-light background,

    J. Wei, Y . Qu, and Y . Ma, “Review of infrared object detection al- gorithms for low-light background,” in Third International Conference on Image Processing and Intelligent Control (IPIC 2023) , vol. 12782. SPIE, 2023, pp. 212–222

    2023

  30. [36]

    Uav countermeasures: status quo, breakthroughs, challenges, and future prospects,

    Z. Wei and W. Liu, “Uav countermeasures: status quo, breakthroughs, challenges, and future prospects,” in Fifth International Conference on Physics and Engineering Mathematics (ICPEM 2024) , vol. 13554. SPIE, 2025, pp. 107–113

    2024

  31. [37]

    Nation’s defense: A comprehensive review of anti-drone systems and strategies,

    D. Chauhan, H. Kagathara, H. Mewada, S. Patel, S. Kavaiya, and G. Barb, “Nation’s defense: A comprehensive review of anti-drone systems and strategies,” IEEE Access, 2025

    2025

  32. [38]

    A unified approach for tracking uavs in infrared

    J. Zhao, X. Zhang, and P. Zhang, “A unified approach for tracking uavs in infrared.” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , 2021, pp. 1213–1222

    2021

  33. [39]

    Semi-automatic annotation for visual object tracking,

    K. G. Ince, A. Koksal, A. Fazla, and A. A. Alatan, “Semi-automatic annotation for visual object tracking,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , 2021, pp. 1233–1239

    2021

  34. [40]

    Effect of annotation errors on drone detection with yolov3,

    A. Koksal, K. G. Ince, and A. Alatan, “Effect of annotation errors on drone detection with yolov3,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops , 2020, pp. 1030–1031

    2020

  35. [41]

    Ipg-net: Image pyramid guidance network for small object detection,

    Z. Liu, G. Gao, L. Sun, and L. Fang, “Ipg-net: Image pyramid guidance network for small object detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops , 2020, pp. 1026–1027

    2020

  36. [42]

    A real-time robust approach for tracking uavs in infrared videos,

    H. Wu, W. Li, W. Li, and G. Liu, “A real-time robust approach for tracking uavs in infrared videos,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops , 2020, pp. 1032–1033

    2020

  37. [43]

    Real world object detection dataset for quadcopter unmanned aerial vehicle detection,

    M. Pawełczyk and M. Wojtyra, “Real world object detection dataset for quadcopter unmanned aerial vehicle detection,” IEEE Access , vol. 8, pp. 174 394–174 409, 2020

    2020

  38. [44]

    A novel robust tracking algorithm for anti-uav based on dynamic similarity scale estimation and adaptive occlusion-aware,

    H. Zhang, Z. Liu, M. Ji, K. Li, and Y . Yu, “A novel robust tracking algorithm for anti-uav based on dynamic similarity scale estimation and adaptive occlusion-aware,” Physica Scripta, 2025

    2025

  39. [45]

    Unmanned aerial vehicle visual detection and tracking using deep neural networks: A performance benchmark,

    B. K. Isaac-Medina, M. Poyser, D. Organisciak, C. G. Willcocks, T. P. Breckon, and H. P. Shum, “Unmanned aerial vehicle visual detection and tracking using deep neural networks: A performance benchmark,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Visio...

    2021

  40. [46]

    A real-time anti-distractor infrared uav tracker with channel feature refinement 17 module,

    H. Fang, X. Wang, Z. Liao, Y . Chang, and L. Yan, “A real-time anti-distractor infrared uav tracker with channel feature refinement 17 module,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , 2021, pp. 1240–1248

    2021

  41. [47]

    Infrared small target detection with total variation and reweighted ℓ1 regularization,

    H. Fang, M. Chen, X. Liu, and S. Yao, “Infrared small target detection with total variation and reweighted ℓ1 regularization,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering , vol. 2020, no. 1, p. 1529704, 2020

    2020

  42. [48]

    Anti-uav: A large-scale benchmark for vision- based uav tracking,

    N. Jiang, K. Wang, X. Peng, X. Yu, Q. Wang, J. Xing, G. Li, G. Guo, Q. Ye, J. Jiao et al. , “Anti-uav: A large-scale benchmark for vision- based uav tracking,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia , vol. 25, pp. 486–500, 2021

    2021

  43. [49]

    A comparative study of unauthorized drone detection techniques,

    C. Koulouris, P. Dimitrios, I. Al-Darraji, G. Tsaramirsis, and H. Tamimi, “A comparative study of unauthorized drone detection techniques,” in 2023 9th International Conference on Information Technology Trends (ITT). IEEE, 2023, pp. 32–37

    2023

  44. [50]

    A benchmark with multi-sensor fusion for uav detection and distance estimation,

    H. Chen, “A benchmark with multi-sensor fusion for uav detection and distance estimation,” Master’s thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo, 2022

    2022

  45. [51]

    Strong baseline: Multi-uav tracking via yolov12 with bot- sort-reid,

    Y .-H. Chen, “Strong baseline: Multi-uav tracking via yolov12 with bot- sort-reid,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.17237 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  46. [52]

    F-yolov7: fast and robust real-time uav detection,

    Y . Du, T. Wu, Z. Dai, H. Xie, C. Hu, and S. Wei, “F-yolov7: fast and robust real-time uav detection,” Computing, vol. 107, no. 1, p. 50, 2025

    2025

  47. [53]

    Yolo-gcof: A lightweight low-altitude drone detection model,

    W. Yu and K. Mo, “Yolo-gcof: A lightweight low-altitude drone detection model,” IEEE Access, 2025

    2025

  48. [54]

    Nnakf: A neural network adapted kalman filter for target tracking,

    S. Jouaber, S. Bonnabel, S. Velasco-Forero, and M. Pilte, “Nnakf: A neural network adapted kalman filter for target tracking,” in ICASSP 2021-2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 4075–4079

    2021

  49. [55]

    Anti-UA V Organization

    (2025) 4th anti-uav dataset and challenge. Anti-UA V Organization. [Online]. Available: https://anti-uav.github.io/

    2025

  50. [56]

    A novel dataset and detection method for unmanned aerial vehicles using an improved yolov9 algorithm,

    D. Gao, J. Tang, H. Li, B. Wang, J. Qiu, S. Chen, and X. Mei, “A novel dataset and detection method for unmanned aerial vehicles using an improved yolov9 algorithm,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 23, p. 7512, 2024

    2024

  51. [57]

    Mmfw-uav dataset: multi-sensor and multi-view fixed-wing uav dataset for air-to-air vision tasks,

    Y . Liu, Z. Sun, L. Xi, L. Zhang, W. Dong, C. Chen, M. Lu, H. Fu, and F. Deng, “Mmfw-uav dataset: multi-sensor and multi-view fixed-wing uav dataset for air-to-air vision tasks,” Scientific Data, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 185, 2025

    2025

  52. [58]

    Learning adaptive detection and tracking collaborations with augmented uav synthesis for accurate anti-uav system,

    S. Liu, T. Xu, X.-F. Zhu, X.-J. Wu, and J. Kittler, “Learning adaptive detection and tracking collaborations with augmented uav synthesis for accurate anti-uav system,”Expert Systems with Applications, p. 127679, 2025

    2025

  53. [59]

    Syndronevi- sion: A synthetic dataset for image-based drone detection,

    T. R. Lenhard, A. Weinmann, K. Franke, and T. Koch, “Syndronevi- sion: A synthetic dataset for image-based drone detection,” in 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). IEEE, 2025, pp. 7637–7647

    2025

  54. [60]

    Wrn-yolo: An improved yolo for drone detection using wide resnet,

    Y . J. Wong, W. V oon, M.-L. Tham, B.-H. Kwan, Y . C. Chang, and Y . C. Hum, “Wrn-yolo: An improved yolo for drone detection using wide resnet,” Authorea Preprints, 2025

    2025

  55. [61]

    Mmaud: A comprehensive multi-modal anti-uav dataset for modern miniature drone threats,

    S. Yuan, Y . Yang, T. H. Nguyen, T.-M. Nguyen, J. Yang, F. Liu, J. Li, H. Wang, and L. Xie, “Mmaud: A comprehensive multi-modal anti-uav dataset for modern miniature drone threats,” in2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 2745–2751

    2024

  56. [62]

    Global-local mav detection under challenging conditions based on appearance and motion,

    H. Guo, Y . Zheng, Y . Zhang, Z. Gao, and S. Zhao, “Global-local mav detection under challenging conditions based on appearance and motion,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 2024

    2024

  57. [63]

    Real-time multi-drone de- tection and tracking for pursuit-evasion with parameter search,

    J. Xiao, J. H. Chee, and M. Feroskhan, “Real-time multi-drone de- tection and tracking for pursuit-evasion with parameter search,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2024

    2024

  58. [64]

    Irsdd-yolov5: Focusing on the infrared detection of small drones,

    S. Yuan, B. Sun, Z. Zuo, H. Huang, P. Wu, C. Li, Z. Dang, and Z. Zhao, “Irsdd-yolov5: Focusing on the infrared detection of small drones,” Drones, vol. 7, no. 6, p. 393, 2023

    2023

  59. [65]

    Vision-based anti-uav de- tection and tracking,

    J. Zhao, J. Zhang, D. Li, and D. Wang, “Vision-based anti-uav de- tection and tracking,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 25 323–25 334, 2022

    2022

  60. [66]

    One-stage cascade refinement networks for infrared small target detection,

    Y . Dai, X. Li, F. Zhou, Y . Qian, Y . Chen, and J. Yang, “One-stage cascade refinement networks for infrared small target detection,” IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol. 61, pp. 1–17, 2023

    2023

  61. [67]

    A dataset for multi-sensor drone detection,

    F. Svanstr ¨om, F. Alonso-Fernandez, and C. Englund, “A dataset for multi-sensor drone detection,” Data in Brief, vol. 39, p. 107521, 2021

    2021

  62. [68]

    Reconstruction of 3d flight trajectories from ad-hoc camera networks,

    J. Li, J. Murray, D. Ismaili, K. Schindler, and C. Albl, “Reconstruction of 3d flight trajectories from ad-hoc camera networks,” in 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2020, pp. 1621–1628

    2020

  63. [69]

    Air-to-air visual detection of micro-uavs: An experimental evaluation of deep learning,

    Y . Zheng, Z. Chen, D. Lv, Z. Li, Z. Lan, and S. Zhao, “Air-to-air visual detection of micro-uavs: An experimental evaluation of deep learning,” IEEE Robotics and automation letters , vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1020–1027, 2021

    2021

  64. [70]

    On training datasets for machine learning-based visual relative localization of micro-scale uavs,

    V . Walter, M. Vrba, and M. Saska, “On training datasets for machine learning-based visual relative localization of micro-scale uavs,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 10 674–10 680

    2020

  65. [71]

    Tib-net: Drone detection network with tiny iterative backbone,

    H. Sun, J. Yang, J. Shen, D. Liang, L. Ning-Zhong, and H. Zhou, “Tib-net: Drone detection network with tiny iterative backbone,” Ieee Access, vol. 8, pp. 130 697–130 707, 2020

    2020

  66. [72]

    Asymmetric contextual modulation for infrared small target detection,

    Y . Dai, Y . Wu, F. Zhou, and K. Barnard, “Asymmetric contextual modulation for infrared small target detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, 2021, pp. 950–959

    2021

  67. [73]

    Spatiotemporal bundle adjustment for dynamic 3d reconstruction,

    M. V o, S. G. Narasimhan, and Y . Sheikh, “Spatiotemporal bundle adjustment for dynamic 3d reconstruction,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2016, pp. 1710–1718

    2016

  68. [74]

    A method for improving efficiency of anti-uav radar based on fmcw,

    S. Ma, Y . Zhang, D. Zhu, and X. Huang, “A method for improving efficiency of anti-uav radar based on fmcw,” in 2021 IEEE 15th International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments (ICEMI). IEEE, 2021, pp. 109–113

    2021

  69. [75]

    Unmanned aerial vehicle hub detection using software-defined radio,

    X. Huang, K. Yan, H.-C. Wu, and Y . Wu, “Unmanned aerial vehicle hub detection using software-defined radio,” in 2019 IEEE Interna- tional Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB). IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–6

    2019

  70. [76]

    Acoustic source localization for anti-uav based on machine learning in wireless sensor networks,

    H. Liu, K. Fan, and B. He, “Acoustic source localization for anti-uav based on machine learning in wireless sensor networks,” in 2020 15th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 1142–1147

    2020

  71. [77]

    Slow-moving micro-uav detection with a small scale digital array radar,

    A. Aldowesh, T. Alnuaim, and A. Alzogaiby, “Slow-moving micro-uav detection with a small scale digital array radar,” in 2019 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf). IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–5

    2019

  72. [78]

    Detection and tracking of drones using advanced acoustic cameras,

    J. Busset, F. Perrodin, P. Wellig, B. Ott, K. Heutschi, T. R ¨uhl, and T. Nussbaumer, “Detection and tracking of drones using advanced acoustic cameras,” in Unmanned/Unattended Sensors and Sensor Net- works XI; and Advanced Free-Space Optical Communication Tech- niques and App...

    2015

  73. [79]

    Anchor-free multi- uav detection and classification using spectrogram,

    R. Zhao, T. Li, Y . Li, Y . Ruan, and R. Zhang, “Anchor-free multi- uav detection and classification using spectrogram,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 5259–5272, 2023

    2023

  74. [81]

    Uav detection and identification based on wifi signal and rf fingerprint,

    W. Nie, Z.-C. Han, M. Zhou, L.-B. Xie, and Q. Jiang, “Uav detection and identification based on wifi signal and rf fingerprint,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 13 540–13 550, 2021

    2021

  75. [82]

    Radar detection of low-slow-small uavs in complex environments,

    S. Shao, W. Zhu, and Y . Li, “Radar detection of low-slow-small uavs in complex environments,” in 2022 IEEE 10th joint international information technology and artificial intelligence conference (ITAIC) , vol. 10. IEEE, 2022, pp. 1153–1157

    2022

  76. [83]

    Real-time drone detection and tracking with visible, thermal and acoustic sensors,

    F. Svanstr ¨om, C. Englund, and F. Alonso-Fernandez, “Real-time drone detection and tracking with visible, thermal and acoustic sensors,” in 2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 7265–7272

    2020

  77. [84]

    Real-time small drones detection based on pruned yolov4,

    H. Liu, K. Fan, Q. Ouyang, and N. Li, “Real-time small drones detection based on pruned yolov4,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 10, p. 3374, 2021

    2021

  78. [85]

    Tph-yolov5: Improved yolov5 based on transformer prediction head for object detection on drone- captured scenarios,

    X. Zhu, S. Lyu, X. Wang, and Q. Zhao, “Tph-yolov5: Improved yolov5 based on transformer prediction head for object detection on drone- captured scenarios,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , 2021, pp. 2778–2788

    2021

  79. [86]

    Uav detection and tracking in urban environments using passive sensors: A survey,

    X. Yan, T. Fu, H. Lin, F. Xuan, Y . Huang, Y . Cao, H. Hu, and P. Liu, “Uav detection and tracking in urban environments using passive sensors: A survey,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 20, p. 11320, 2023

    2023

  80. [87]

    You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection,

    J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick, and A. Farhadi, “You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016, pp. 779– 788

    2016

  81. [88]

    Fast and accurate detection of uav objects based on mobile-yolo network,

    J. Wang, W. Hongjun, J. Liu, R. Zhou, C. Chen, and C. Liu, “Fast and accurate detection of uav objects based on mobile-yolo network,” in 2022 14th International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 01–05

    2022

  82. [89]

    A fine-grained detector of face mask wearing status based on improved yolox,

    H. Xiao, B. Wang, J. Zheng, L. Liu, and C. P. Chen, “A fine-grained detector of face mask wearing status based on improved yolox,” IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1816–1830, 2023. 18

    2023

  83. [90]

    Anti-uav detection method based on local-global feature focusing module,

    Q. Cheng, J. Li, J. Du, and S. Li, “Anti-uav detection method based on local-global feature focusing module,” in 2024 IEEE 7th Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC), vol. 7. IEEE, 2024, pp. 1413–1418

    2024

  84. [91]

    A global-local tracking framework driven by both motion and appearance for infrared anti-uav,

    Y . Li, D. Yuan, M. Sun, H. Wang, X. Liu, and J. Liu, “A global-local tracking framework driven by both motion and appearance for infrared anti-uav,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2023, pp. 3026–3035

    2023

  85. [92]

    A lightweight anti-unmanned aerial vehicle detection method based on improved yolov11,

    Y . Gao, Y . Xin, H. Yang, and Y . Wang, “A lightweight anti-unmanned aerial vehicle detection method based on improved yolov11,” Drones, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 11, 2024

    2024

  86. [93]

    Nfe-yolo: A lightweight and efficient detection network for low, slow, and small drones,

    D. Tian, C. Wang, D. Zhou, X. Yan, and L. Zeng, “Nfe-yolo: A lightweight and efficient detection network for low, slow, and small drones,” IEEE Access, 2024

    2024

  87. [94]

    Ldhd-net: A lightweight network with double branch head for feature enhancement of uav targets in complex scenes,

    C. Zhang, Q. Gao, R. Shi, and M. Yue, “Ldhd-net: A lightweight network with double branch head for feature enhancement of uav targets in complex scenes,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 2024, no. 1, p. 7259029, 2024

    2024

  88. [95]

    Bra-yolov10: Uav small target detection based on yolov10,

    Q. Zhang, X. Wang, H. Shi, K. Wang, Y . Tian, Z. Xu, Y . Zhang, and G. Jia, “Bra-yolov10: Uav small target detection based on yolov10,” Drones, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 159, 2025

    2025

  89. [97]

    A lightweight drone detection method integrated into a linear attention mechanism based on improved yolov11,

    S. Zhou, L. Yang, H. Liu, C. Zhou, J. Liu, S. Zhao, and K. Wang, “A lightweight drone detection method integrated into a linear attention mechanism based on improved yolov11,” Remote Sensing , vol. 17, no. 4, p. 705, 2025

    2025

  90. [98]

    Uett4k anti-uav: A large scale 4k benchmark dataset for vision-based drone detection in high- resolution imagery,

    M. S. Awan, S. A. A. Zaidi, and J. Mir, “Uett4k anti-uav: A large scale 4k benchmark dataset for vision-based drone detection in high- resolution imagery,” IEEE Access, 2025

    2025

  91. [99]

    Yolov6 v3. 0: A full-scale reloading,

    C. Li, L. Li, Y . Geng, H. Jiang, M. Cheng, B. Zhang, Z. Ke, X. Xu, and X. Chu, “Yolov6 v3. 0: A full-scale reloading,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.05586, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Design of uav target detection network based on deep feature fusion and optimization with small targets in complex contexts,

    J. Liu, B. Wen, J. Xiao, and M. Sun, “Design of uav target detection network based on deep feature fusion and optimization with small targets in complex contexts,” Neurocomputing, vol. 639, p. 130207, 2025

    2025

  93. [101]

    Gan-uav-yolov10s: improved yolov10s network for detecting small uav targets in mountainous conditions based on infrared image data,

    N. T. Phat, N. L. Giang, and B. D. Duy, “Gan-uav-yolov10s: improved yolov10s network for detecting small uav targets in mountainous conditions based on infrared image data,” Neural Computing and Applications, pp. 1–13, 2025

    2025

  94. [102]

    Lightweight uav small target detection and perception based on improved yolov8-e,

    Y . Zhao, L. Wang, G. Lei, C. Guo, and Q. Ma, “Lightweight uav small target detection and perception based on improved yolov8-e,” Drones, vol. 8, no. 11, p. 681, 2024

    2024

  95. [103]

    Fora: Low-rank adaptation model beyond multimodal siamese network,

    W. Xie, Y . Zhang, T. Hui, J. Zhang, J. Lei, and Y . Li, “Fora: Low-rank adaptation model beyond multimodal siamese network,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16129, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Uav surveillance with deep learning using visual, thermal and acoustic sensors,

    D. Xing, “Uav surveillance with deep learning using visual, thermal and acoustic sensors,” Ph.D. dissertation, New York University Tandon School of Engineering, 2023

    2023

  97. [105]

    Leveraging transformer models for anti-jamming in heavily attacked uav environments,

    I. Elleuch, A. Pourranjbar, and G. Kaddoum, “Leveraging transformer models for anti-jamming in heavily attacked uav environments,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , 2024

    2024

  98. [106]

    Modality meets long-term tracker: A siamese dual fusion framework for tracking uav,

    Z. Zhang, L. Jin, S. Li, J. Xia, J. Wang, Z. Li, Z. Zhu, W. Yang, P. Zhang, J. Zhao et al., “Modality meets long-term tracker: A siamese dual fusion framework for tracking uav,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1975–1979

    2023

  99. [107]

    Siamrpn++: Evolution of siamese visual tracking with very deep networks,

    B. Li, W. Wu, Q. Wang, F. Zhang, J. Xing, and J. Yan, “Siamrpn++: Evolution of siamese visual tracking with very deep networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019, pp. 4282–4291

    2019

  100. [108]

    Siammask: A framework for fast online object tracking and segmentation,

    W. Hu, Q. Wang, L. Zhang, L. Bertinetto, and P. H. Torr, “Siammask: A framework for fast online object tracking and segmentation,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 3072–3089, 2023

    2023

  101. [109]

    Siamfc++: Towards robust and accurate visual tracking with target estimation guidelines,

    Y . Xu, Z. Wang, Z. Li, Y . Yuan, and G. Yu, “Siamfc++: Towards robust and accurate visual tracking with target estimation guidelines,” in Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 34, no. 07, 2020, pp. 12 549–12 556

    2020

  102. [110]

    Siam r-cnn: Visual tracking by re-detection,

    P. V oigtlaender, J. Luiten, P. H. Torr, and B. Leibe, “Siam r-cnn: Visual tracking by re-detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2020, pp. 6578–6588

    2020

  103. [111]

    Siamuf: Siamcar based small uav tracker using dense u-shape deep features in near infrared videos,

    K. Qian, J. Shen, S. Wang, Y . Wu, and G. Lu, “Siamuf: Siamcar based small uav tracker using dense u-shape deep features in near infrared videos,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering , vol. 186, p. 108825, 2025

    2025

  104. [112]

    A contrastive- augmented memory network for anti-uav tracking in tir videos,

    Z. Wang, Y . Hu, J. Yang, G. Zhou, F. Liu, and Y . Liu, “A contrastive- augmented memory network for anti-uav tracking in tir videos,”Remote Sensing, vol. 16, no. 24, p. 4775, 2024

    2024

  105. [113]

    Strongsiamtracker: A siamese tracker with dynamic global detection for robust anti-uav tracking,

    X. Cui, L. Wan, L. Kong, J. Li, C. Zhang, R. Zhao, P. Wu, and S. He, “Strongsiamtracker: A siamese tracker with dynamic global detection for robust anti-uav tracking,” in Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , 2025, pp. 6619–6629

    2025

  106. [114]

    Dlst: Dual-template co-evolution learning for robust long-term drone tracking in dynamic environments,

    J. Zhang, Y . Wei, J. Zhang, Z. Jiang, P. Yu, Y . Ma, and R. Jin, “Dlst: Dual-template co-evolution learning for robust long-term drone tracking in dynamic environments,” in Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , 2025, pp. 6641–6649

    2025

  107. [115]

    Pptracker: Tracking uav swarms with prior prompt,

    H. Q. Qin, T. Li, T. Xu, J. Xu, Y . Fang, and J. Li, “Pptracker: Tracking uav swarms with prior prompt,” in Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , 2025, pp. 6583–6590

    2025

  108. [116]

    Siamatl: Online update of siamese tracking network via attentional transfer learning,

    B. Huang, T. Xu, Z. Shen, S. Jiang, B. Zhao, and Z. Bian, “Siamatl: Online update of siamese tracking network via attentional transfer learning,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 7527– 7540, 2021

    2021

  109. [117]

    Fully-convolutional siamese networks for object tracking,

    L. Bertinetto, J. Valmadre, J. F. Henriques, A. Vedaldi, and P. H. Torr, “Fully-convolutional siamese networks for object tracking,” in Computer vision–ECCV 2016 workshops: Amsterdam, the Netherlands, October 8-10 and 15-16, 2016, proceedings, part II 14. Springer, 2016, pp. 850–865

    2016

  110. [118]

    High performance visual tracking with siamese region proposal network,

    B. Li, J. Yan, W. Wu, Z. Zhu, and X. Hu, “High performance visual tracking with siamese region proposal network,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2018, pp. 8971–8980

    2018

  111. [119]

    Distractor-aware siamese networks for visual object tracking,

    Z. Zhu, Q. Wang, B. Li, W. Wu, J. Yan, and W. Hu, “Distractor-aware siamese networks for visual object tracking,” in Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) , 2018, pp. 101–117

    2018

  112. [120]

    Siamese box adaptive network for visual tracking,

    Z. Chen, B. Zhong, G. Li, S. Zhang, and R. Ji, “Siamese box adaptive network for visual tracking,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2020, pp. 6668–6677

    2020

  113. [121]

    Siamcar: Siamese fully convolutional classification and regression for visual tracking,

    D. Guo, J. Wang, Y . Cui, Z. Wang, and S. Chen, “Siamcar: Siamese fully convolutional classification and regression for visual tracking,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020, pp. 6269–6277

    2020

  114. [122]

    Transforming model prediction for tracking,

    C. Mayer, M. Danelljan, G. Bhat, M. Paul, D. P. Paudel, F. Yu, and L. Van Gool, “Transforming model prediction for tracking,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2022, pp. 8731–8740

    2022

  115. [123]

    Aiatrack: Attention in attention for transformer visual tracking,

    S. Gao, C. Zhou, C. Ma, X. Wang, and J. Yuan, “Aiatrack: Attention in attention for transformer visual tracking,” in European conference on computer vision . Springer, 2022, pp. 146–164

    2022

  116. [124]

    Swintrack: A simple and strong baseline for transformer tracking,

    L. Lin, H. Fan, Z. Zhang, Y . Xu, and H. Ling, “Swintrack: A simple and strong baseline for transformer tracking,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 35, pp. 16 743–16 754, 2022

    2022

  117. [125]

    St- trans: Spatial-temporal transformer for infrared small target detection in sequential images,

    X. Tong, Z. Zuo, S. Su, J. Wei, X. Sun, P. Wu, and Z. Zhao, “St- trans: Spatial-temporal transformer for infrared small target detection in sequential images,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 62, pp. 1–19, 2024

    2024

  118. [126]

    Transist: Transformer based infrared small target tracking using multi-scale feature and exponential moving average learning,

    K. Qian, D. Zhu, Y . Wu, J. Shen, and S. Zhang, “Transist: Transformer based infrared small target tracking using multi-scale feature and exponential moving average learning,” Infrared Physics & Technology, vol. 145, p. 105674, 2025

    2025

  119. [127]

    A unified transformer based tracker for anti-uav tracking,

    Q. Yu, Y . Ma, J. He, D. Yang, and T. Zhang, “A unified transformer based tracker for anti-uav tracking,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2023, pp. 3036–3046

    2023

  120. [128]

    Siamsta: Spatio-temporal attention based siamese tracker for tracking uavs,

    B. Huang, J. Chen, T. Xu, Y . Wang, S. Jiang, Y . Wang, L. Wang, and J. Li, “Siamsta: Spatio-temporal attention based siamese tracker for tracking uavs,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , 2021, pp. 1204–1212

    2021

  121. [129]

    Slbaf-net: Super-lightweight bimodal adaptive fusion network for uav detection in low recognition environment,

    X. Cheng, K. Geng, Z. Wang, J. Wang, Y . Sun, and P. Ding, “Slbaf-net: Super-lightweight bimodal adaptive fusion network for uav detection in low recognition environment,” Multimedia Tools and Applications , vol. 82, no. 30, pp. 47 773–47 792, 2023

    2023

  122. [130]

    Uav detection system with multiple acoustic nodes using machine learning models,

    B. Yang, E. T. Matson, A. H. Smith, J. E. Dietz, and J. C. Gallagher, “Uav detection system with multiple acoustic nodes using machine learning models,” in 2019 Third IEEE international conference on robotic computing (IRC) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 493–498

    2019

  123. [131]

    A multi-task framework for infrared small target detection and segmentation,

    Y . Chen, L. Li, X. Liu, and X. Su, “A multi-task framework for infrared small target detection and segmentation,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 60, pp. 1–9, 2022

    2022

  124. [132]

    Asifusion: An adaptive saliency injection-based infrared and visible 19 image fusion network,

    Z. Liu, Y . Yang, K. Wu, Q. Liu, X. Xu, X. Ma, and J. Tang, “Asifusion: An adaptive saliency injection-based infrared and visible 19 image fusion network,” ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications , vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1–23, 2024

    2024

  125. [133]

    Radar/visual fusion with fuse-before-track strategy for low altitude non-cooperative sense and avoid,

    F. Vitiello, F. Causa, R. Opromolla, and G. Fasano, “Radar/visual fusion with fuse-before-track strategy for low altitude non-cooperative sense and avoid,” Aerospace Science and Technology , vol. 146, p. 108946, 2024

    2024

  126. [134]

    Rtm- uavdet: A real-time multimodal uav detector,

    G. Wang, Q. Jiang, X. Jin, M. Wozniak, and P. W. S. Yao, “Rtm- uavdet: A real-time multimodal uav detector,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems , 2024

    2024

  127. [135]

    A dataset for small infrared moving target detection under clutter background,

    X. Sun, L. Guo, W. Zhang, Z. Wang, Y . Hou, Z. Li, and X. Teng, “A dataset for small infrared moving target detection under clutter background,” Chin. Sci. Data , vol. 5, no. 6, p. 8, 2021

    2021

  128. [136]

    A dataset for infrared detection and tracking of dim-small aircraft targets under ground/air background,

    B. Hui, Z. Song, H. Fan, P. Zhong, W. Hu, X. Zhang, J. Ling, H. Su, W. Jin, Y . Zhang et al., “A dataset for infrared detection and tracking of dim-small aircraft targets under ground/air background,” China Sci. Data, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 291–302, 2020

    2020

  129. [137]

    Material based object tracking in hyperspectral videos,

    F. Xiong, J. Zhou, and Y . Qian, “Material based object tracking in hyperspectral videos,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 29, pp. 3719–3733, 2020

    2020

  130. [138]

    A dataset for infrared image dim-small aircraft target detection and tracking under ground/air background,

    B. H. B. Hui, Z. S. Z. Song, H. F. H. Fan, P. Z. P. Zhong, W. H. W. Hu, X. Z. X. Zhang, J. L. J. Lin, H. S. H. Su, W. J. W. Jin, Y . Z. Y . Zhang et al. , “A dataset for infrared image dim-small aircraft target detection and tracking under ground/air background,” Science Data ...

    2019

  131. [139]

    Advances in quantum radar and quantum lidar,

    R. G. Torrom ´e and S. Barzanjeh, “Advances in quantum radar and quantum lidar,” Progress in Quantum Electronics , vol. 93, p. 100497, 2024

    2024

  132. [140]

    Ex- ploring temporally dynamic data augmentation for video recognition,

    T. Kim, J. Kim, M. Shim, S. Yun, M. Kang, D. Wee, and S. Lee, “Ex- ploring temporally dynamic data augmentation for video recognition,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.15015 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Data augmentation as fea- ture manipulation,

    R. Shen, S. Bubeck, and S. Gunasekar, “Data augmentation as fea- ture manipulation,” in International conference on machine learning . PMLR, 2022, pp. 19 773–19 808

    2022

  134. [142]

    Efficient image super-resolution integration,

    K. Xu, X. Wang, X. Yang, S. He, Q. Zhang, B. Yin, X. Wei, and R. W. Lau, “Efficient image super-resolution integration,” The Visual Computer, vol. 34, pp. 1065–1076, 2018

    2018

  135. [143]

    Detect globally, refine locally: A novel approach to saliency detec- tion,

    T. Wang, L. Zhang, S. Wang, H. Lu, G. Yang, X. Ruan, and A. Borji, “Detect globally, refine locally: A novel approach to saliency detec- tion,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 3127–3135

    2018

  136. [144]

    Learning to teach with dynamic loss functions,

    L. Wu, F. Tian, Y . Xia, Y . Fan, T. Qin, L. Jian-Huang, and T.-Y . Liu, “Learning to teach with dynamic loss functions,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 31, 2018

    2018

  137. [145]

    A comprehensive survey of loss functions in machine learning,

    Q. Wang, Y . Ma, K. Zhao, and Y . Tian, “A comprehensive survey of loss functions in machine learning,” Annals of Data Science , vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 187–212, 2022

    2022

  138. [146]

    Dist-tracker: A small object-aware detector and tracker for uav tracking,

    W. Wang, J. Fu, J. Song, K. Li, H. Qiao, J. Liu, H. Sun, and X. Cao, “Dist-tracker: A small object-aware detector and tracker for uav tracking,” in Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2025, pp. 6601–6609. Guanghai Ding received her B.Sc. degr...

    2025

  139. [2021]

    He is currently an assistant professor in the College of Computer Science and Engineering, Guilin Univer- sity of Technology, China

    In 2015, he worked as a research assistant in the Institute of Computational and Theoretical Studies at Hong Kong Baptist University. He is currently an assistant professor in the College of Computer Science and Engineering, Guilin Univer- sity of Technology, China. His resear...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.