Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-06T04:59:42.827986Z
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Large Language Models for Automated Assessment of Student Essays in Higher Education
As of 22 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 1 of 1 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2508.02442.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-04T21:00:08.185248Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-07-03T13:18:12.136780Z
Reference resolution
1 of 1 outbound references displayed
- verified exact1
- verified fuzzy0
- unresolved0
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
Observation 3aec5209-797b-479a-8b30-7188f4d40b81 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Large Language Models for Automated Assessment of Student Essays in Higher Education Unresolved cited work
Reference 1
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-08-06T04:59:43.245886Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.
Pith citing papers
Observation 3f58cb42-3c45-462e-8753-c3cd3597d5b1 · inbound
Automated grading of Linux/bash examinations using large language models: a four-level cognitive taxonomy approach cites this paper.
Automated grading of Linux/bash examinations using large language models: a four-level cognitive taxonomy approach Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Large Language Models for Automated Assessment of Student Essays in Higher Education
Reference 11
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-03T13:18:12.138405Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00.
Observation cc89e189-7f0e-4dfe-958a-090eee4a3e8d · inbound
Comparative Validation of GPT-4o-mini and Teacher Mean Scores for Automated Scoring of Music Analysis Responses: Single-Pass Deployment, Repeatability, and Strategy-Specific Bias cites this paper.
Comparative Validation of GPT-4o-mini and Teacher Mean Scores for Automated Scoring of Music Analysis Responses: Single-Pass Deployment, Repeatability, and Strategy-Specific Bias Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Large Language Models for Automated Assessment of Student Essays in Higher Education
Reference 7
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-04T21:00:08.185248Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.